AMBASSADOR STEVENS ‘ALLOWED TO DIE’ TO PROTECT OBAMA’S FRAUDULENT POLICIES

by Penbrook One

TREASONOUS INACTION:  Eyewitnesses in Benghazi, Libya during the attack on the US mission now say that CIA operatives twice sought permission from commanders to help Ambassador Chris Stevens and his staff, and twice were ordered to 'stand down', while a later request to regional U.S. bases for military backup was also denied.

by Dan Crosby
of The DAILY PEN 

NEW YORK, NY – As U.S. Ambassador Stevens was being murdered by Islamic terrorists during the September 11 attack on the Benghazi, Libya mission headquarters, CIA operators on duty at the mission annex less than a mile from Stevens’ location, were ordered twice to "stand down" when they attempted to help the ambassador's team after they heard shots fired at approximately 9:40 p.m., according to a report from Fox News.

The report also says at least two urgent requests from the CIA operatives for military intervention, one in the early moments of the attack on the U.S. mission, and another in subsequent attack on the annex hours later, were denied by Obama Administration officials.

Even after at least two highly trained Navy Seal operatives experienced in combat assessment and tactical operations tried to tell the command center that military intervention was required, the Obama Administration still refused claiming there was not enough information about the attack to warrant a tactical response.

However, critics among the Intelligence community and military Special Operations command say claims by the Obama administration that information was not available are a lie.  They insist an on-site assessment from tactically trained Navy Seals actively engaged on the ground during the attack is more than enough intelligence information, by itself, to conduct an QRF (Quick Reaction Force) evacuation operation “site unseen”.

"...an on-site assessment from tactically trained Navy Seals actively engaged on the ground during the attack is more than enough intelligence information, by itself, to conduct a QRF evacuation operation...'site unseen'."

Defending the Obama Administration’s failed response to the attack, Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta joined Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton saying, “…there was not enough information on the ground to safely send help.” 

However, Panetta’s testimony is contradicted by the recent disclosure of State Department emails which show that Obama, himself, as well as his staff were aware of the circumstances and extent of the attack from the moment it began.

Fox also reports that live video feeds from two separate drones in the skies over the attack were also being viewed by Obama administration officials in real time, which means they had more than enough information to assess the threat and provide help.

Also, former special operations commanders say that within moments of the beginning of the attack, a digital station-to-station “Flash Traffic” notification was sent to the U.S. operations headquarters in Tripoli, Italy telling officials there that the Ambassador was in peril.

Within the intelligence and security services forces deployed in the region, Ambassador Steven’s security detail is treated the same as those for a Chief of Staff or four-star general.  This means a “Flash Traffic” message must be immediately relayed in code form to the White House situation room explicitly stating the Ambassador is in peril and the message must be confirmed as received by the desk watch officer charged with conveying the message under standing orders to physically carry the notification directly to the White House situation room.

Africom Ops Center, the U.S. main communications network in the region, would have also been monitoring the attack in real time from Germany.  Three networks of communications are simultaneously connected through headquarters in North Africa, southern Europe and tactical placements in the Mediterranean region.  All forces remain on “strip ready” standby which means operatives are able to board aircraft and take off in minutes to engage any evacuation operation for U.S. diplomats in the region.  The nearest Evac Force was just 45 minutes from the Libyan Consulate, well within their capability to have saved Ambassador Stevens and his staff at any time during the seven hour assault.

The events as reported by Fox unfolded as follows:

“Former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods was manning the CIA annex with a small team about a mile from the U.S. Consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens and his team came under attack. When Woods and others heard the shots fired, they informed their higher-ups at the annex to tell them what they were hearing and requested permission to go to the consulate and help out. They were told to "stand down," according to sources familiar with the exchange. Soon after, they were again told to ‘stand down.’”

The report says Woods and at least two other CIA agents ignored those orders and made their way to the Consulate which at that point was on fire.  The report suggests Woods and his team heroically violated orders and, in attempting to rescue Stevens and his staff, may have exposed something more sinister.  Woods was later joined at the scene by fellow former Navy SEAL Glen Doherty, who was sent in from Tripoli as part of a Global Response Staff or GRS that provides security to CIA case officers and provides countersurveillance and surveillance protection.

“Obviously, these brave men had a good reason for defying orders and engage the attackers in defense of Ambassador Stevens,” says former special operations commander, Lt. Col. Douglas Radcliff.

"They must have known that they would have no back up if they engaged the fight against orders.  But,they did it anyway and paid with their lives."  

"Obviously, these brave men had a good reason for defying orders and engage the attackers in defense of Ambassador Stevens..."

There is much speculation about the motives for such derelict inaction by the Obama administration’s command.  Many theorize the Obama administration may have been using Ambassador Stevens to broker a covert arms deal through Turkey to arm Syrian rebels to help overthrow the Assad regime in Damascus.  Some believe the attack was a retaliatory strike for the allegation by the Obama Administration that it killed Osama Bin Laden in May, 2011.

The Fox report continues, “The quick reaction by Woods’ team from the CIA annex evacuated those who remained at the Consulate and Sean Smith, who had been killed in the initial attack. They could not find the ambassador and returned to the CIA annex at about midnight.”

“At that point, they called again for military support and help because they were taking fire at the CIA safe house, or annex. The request was denied. There were no communications problems at the annex, according those present at the compound. The team was in constant radio contact with their headquarters. In fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours -- enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. Fox News has also learned that two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait, among them Delta Force operators.”

The Fox report continued, “A Special Operations team, or CIF which stands for Commanders in Extremis Force, operating in Central Europe had been moved to Sigonella, Italy, but they too were told to stand down. A second force that specializes in counterterrorism rescues was on hand at Sigonella, according to senior military and intelligence sources. According to those sources, they could have flown to Benghazi in less than two hours. They were the same distance to Benghazi as those that were sent from Tripoli. Specter gunships are commonly used by the Special Operations community to provide close air support.

According to sources on the ground during the attack, the special operator on the roof of the CIA annex had visual contact and a laser pointing at the Libyan mortar team that was targeting the CIA annex. The operators were calling in coordinates of where the Libyan forces were firing from.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told reporters at the Pentagon on Thursday that there was not a clear enough picture of what was occurring on the ground in Benghazi to send help.

"There's a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking going on here," Panetta said Thursday. "But the basic principle here ... is that you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on."

U.S. officials argue that there was a period of several hours when the fighting stopped before the mortars were fired at the annex, leading officials to believe the attack was over.

Fox News has learned that there were two military surveillance drones redirected to Benghazi shortly after the attack on the Consulate began. They were already in the vicinity. The second surveillance craft was sent to relieve the first drone, perhaps due to fuel issues. Both were capable of sending real time visuals back to U.S. officials in Washington, D.C. Any U.S. official or agency with the proper clearance, including the White House Situation Room, State Department, CIA, Pentagon and others, could call up that video in real time on their computers.

Tyrone Woods was later joined at the scene by fellow former Navy SEAL Glen Doherty, who was sent in from Tripoli as part of a Global Response Staff or GRS that provides security to CIA case officers and provides countersurveillance and surveillance protection. They were killed by a mortar shell at 4 a.m. Libyan time, nearly seven hours after the attack on the Consulate began -- a window that represented more than enough time for the U.S. military to send back-up from nearby bases in Europe, according to sources familiar with Special Operations. Four mortars were fired at the annex. The first one struck outside the annex. Three more hit the annex.

A motorcade of dozens of Libyan vehicles, some mounted with 50 caliber machine guns, belonging to the February 17th Brigades, a Libyan militia which is friendly to the U.S., finally showed up at the CIA annex at approximately 3 a.m. An American Quick Reaction Force sent from Tripoli had arrived at the Benghazi airport at 2 a.m. (four hours after the initial attack on the Consulate) and was delayed for 45 minutes at the airport because they could not at first get transportation, allegedly due to confusion among Libyan militias who were supposed to escort them to the annex, according to Benghazi sources.

The American special operators, Woods, Doherty and at least two others were part of the Global Response Staff, a CIA element, based at the CIA annex and were protecting CIA operators who were part of a mission to track and repurchase arms in Benghazi that had proliferated in the wake of Muammar Qaddafi's fall. Part of their mission was to find the more than 20,000 missing MANPADS, or shoulder-held missiles capable of bringing down a commercial aircraft. According to a source on the ground at the time of the attack, the team inside the CIA annex had captured three Libyan attackers and was forced to hand them over to the Libyans. U.S. officials do not know what happened to those three attackers and whether they were released by the Libyan forces.

Fox News has also learned that Stevens was in Benghazi that day to be present at the opening of an English-language school being started by the Libyan farmer who helped save an American pilot who had been shot down by pro-Qaddafi forces during the initial war to overthrow the regime. That farmer saved the life of the American pilot and the Ambassador wanted to be present to launch the Libyan rescuer's new school.”

"The Little Black Box Theory and Obama!"

from - The Parallax Prophecies -

By Ron Ewart, President

National Association of Rural Landowners

and nationally recognized author on freedom and property rights issues.

We are helping to spread freedom and liberty around the globe.

© Copyright Sunday, October 28, 2012 - All Rights Reserved

 

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of Ron Ewart.

 

 

 

 

"You must remember, my dear lady, the most important rule of any successful illusion: First, the people must WANT to believe in it."        

Libba Bray, from "The Sweet Far Thing"

 

 

Several years ago and based on knowledge, experience and observations, we developed a theory about mental processes, biases and deep-seated beliefs of the general population.  We called this theory, the "Little Black Box" theory.  This theory applies across the board to almost everything we believe in and everything we do in our lives.  It is inescapable and what is in the "Little Black Box" determines, to a large margin, how our lives will turn out.  It determines our thoughts, religious beliefs, sexual proclivities, our fears, our strengths, our weaknesses, our successes or failures and even our political persuasions.  The content of the "Little Black Box" and thus a person's point of reference, begins to fill up at a very early age and the person is not aware, nor do they have any control of what is going into it, because it is determined by their early environment, along with a dash of their biological parent's genetics.   

 

SIDEBAR:  Hitler knew this so he developed youth camps to fill up young children's "Little Black Boxes", for diabolical purposes ..... to create adolescent spies to rat on the dissenters and to control the minds and behavior of an entire country.  The camps were very successful for their intended purposes.

 

People behave in direct proportion to the content of the "Little Black Box" and in most cases they are not aware that they are behaving in this manner.  To them it is perfectly normal.  In fact, what is in the "Little Black Box" defines who they are early on in their lives ..... that is, according to our "Little Black Box" theory.  Changes to the content of the "Little Black Box" rarely occur throughout a person's lifetime.  When they do occur, it is almost always the result of some revelation, a violent act or accident, overpowering new information, (true or false) or an epiphany. 

 

The theory is especially applicable to how people believe and act in the religious arena.  It follows then that, if you are born into a Catholic family, there is a high probability you will remain a Catholic for the rest of your life.  The same is true for political leanings and biases.  It is intuitive then to say that, if you are born into a Democrat family, you will most likely remain a Democrat for the rest of your life, without any regard to the substance of what is meant by being a Democrat.   It is equally true for Republicans.  We call it blind party affiliation.

 

If you are born into a poor family, you are likely to remain poor.  If you are born into a wealthy and privileged family, you are quite likely to follow the path of wealth and privilege.  There are exceptions of course.

 

For this reason, people are very selective about what they listen to, watch and read.  They virtually always listen to, watch and read about issues that are compatible and aligned with what is in their "Little Black Box".   They analyze everything they see, hear and read in the context of their "Little Black Box".  It is not a choice they make consciously.  It is pre- determined and pre- programmed for them long before the age of consent.  No matter how convincing an argument you make to another person, they will almost always yield to what is in their "Little Black Box" before all else, even if it defies principle, logic, reason and/or even common sense.   This mostly likely accounts for Obamamania.

 

The fact is, a freshly born human being is nothing more than a giant sponge that absorbs everything that it hears, sees, smells, tastes, or touches in its immediate environment and all that it absorbs is, for the most part, locked into the "Little Black Box" for the rest of their lives.  The person is a slave to it, but is not aware that they are a slave because it defines who they are.  They can be nothing else.

 

The "Little Black Box" theory explains many facets of abnormal behavior in the vast majority of humans.  It explains radical Islam.  It explains a Hitler, a Stalin, a Mao, a Mussolini, a Saddam Hussein, a Gaddafi and a Bashar Al-Asad (current brutal dictator of Syria) and it even explains an Obama.  But it also explains why we are Democrats, Republicans, Baptists, Catholics, Protestants, Muslims, Mormons, communists, socialists, Marxists and a whole host of other belief systems.  We are who we are because we have been "shaped" that way by genetics and by our immediate environmental influences.  Unfortunately, none of this content is as a result of our own personal choices.

 

Our "Little Black Box" theory was completely vindicated after we watched the Presidential debate last Monday night and then watched the reviews of the debate on Fox News and MSNBC news.  It was all so predictable.  The Fox News pundits said Romney did what he planned to do, stayed above the fray and that he looked presidential, but Obama was petulant and petty.  The MSNBC news pundits said that Obama came on strong and articulated his arguments well, but Romney seemed lackluster, offered no substance and was extremely weak on foreign policy.  It was the same debate but with two different perspectives, dictated by what was in each of the observer's "Little Black Box".  So ladies and gentlemen, we ask you, which "Little Black Box" is right?  Which one represents truth?  Which one is based on the foundation of individual freedom and liberty?  Or is there no truth, just distortions of reality, as an evil companion to propaganda, hype and lies?

 

Which brings us to our current situation, the 2012 election and the enigma that is half-white, half-black Barack Hussein Obama.  Obama's early life was shaped by his somewhat promiscuous white biological mother; a black biological father that abandoned Obama within two years of his birth; a Muslim stepfather from Indonesia where Obama lived for several years and attended Islam schools; his white grandparents that Obama lived with for quite some time because apparently, his mother didn't want him any more, or perhaps because she couldn't handle that he was black; a family friend of his grandparents, one Frank Marshall Davis, a known and active communist; several Muslim and mostly black friends while in college and those Muslims he met when he visited Pakistan in 1981; a radical, Chicago pastor, the very reverend and Black Liberation Theologist, Jeremiah Wright; a slum landlord, one Tony Rezko now in jail; and a domestic terrorist by the name of Bill Ayers who used bombs to punctuate a radical political agenda.  Who knows how many other radical influences shaped Obama's early years and young adult life, due to its fractured and convoluted nature?

 

Even differing view points can agree that Obama's time on this planet hardly represented an idyllic life with two loving parents, a stable, structured household, strong morals and personal values and a positive work ethic, that is the foundation of an American way of life under freedom.  What Obama absorbed from the day he was born was wild variances in multi-cultural life styles, double parental abandonment and vastly conflicting belief systems.   He had to cope with white vs. black, Muslim vs. Christian, America vs. Black Africa and Muslim Indonesia and freedom vs. socialism or communism.   These kinds of widely diverse conflicts in one's mind could only have produced a scrambled egg omelet for brains.  Perhaps this explains the devious nature in the way he and his administration handled (or should we say "bungled") the Benghazi terrorist attack on our consulate where 4 Americans were brutally murdered by terrorists.  That Obama and his surrogates would lie to the American people in order to cover up the event for some inexplicable reason (probably political) is a wide open window into the mixed-bag content of Obama's "Little Black Box".

 

But Obama isn't just conflicted he is dangerous.  His "Little Black Box" is so filled with garbage and radical ideas from his childhood and early adult life, that his psychological profile would contain a plethora of red flags.  That he was elected to president of the United States is largely due to the clouded and distorted "Little Black Boxes" in those that voted for him.  That he still remains a viable candidate for a second term is not a mystery.  It is the result of almost a century of progressive indoctrination and brainwashing, showered upon young, impressionable Americans by out-of-touch parents; a socialist agenda, power-driven government; public schools loaded with government propaganda; academia that dishes out a never-ending stream of liberal propaganda; the predominantly left-wing press that aids and abets the progressive ideology; and by foundations using vast sums of money to influence all aspects of American life.  It is no wonder that the "Little Black Boxes" that exist in the minds of a large segment of the American people are so blinded to the American heritage of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness under a proud flag of freedom.  It is no wonder that those dependent on government would shun self-reliance, independence and individual responsibility in the self-interest of maintaining their government handouts.  It is no wonder that those that support Obama also support dirty tricks, sleazy, attack campaign ads and intentional voter fraud to protect those handouts.  For Progressives, winning by any means is the rule, not the exception and it has been going on for at least a century.

 

"The Parallax Prophecies" predicts that if the day ever comes that those with clouded "Little Black Boxes" are greater in number than those who believe in and practice the tenets of constitutional freedom and liberty, freedom will surely die, if it isn't dead already.

 

If Obama is re-elected, the number of people with clouded "Little Black Boxes" will only grow and grow, until the day comes that they will outnumber those that cherish freedom.  Simply by their majority vote they will render the constitution, our Constitutional Republic and freedom, totally irrelevant and meaningless.  As a result, those in power will increase their power until their defined mission of absolute power is finally realized.

 

Who among you are willing to let this happen?  Who among you will condemn your children and grandchildren to the bleak future offered up by Obama and the bankrupt progressive/socialist ideology?  Who among you will get up out of your armchairs and make sure that Obama's future for America never comes to pass?  Who among you will put aside your irrational principle of not voting for the lesser of two evils. 

 

The reality is folks, it is strictly a numbers game.  Obama must go and it will take every conservative vote to send him packing because of the distorted "Little Black Boxes" that exist in millions of Americans.  However, if you want another four years of Obama, by all means, stick to your principles and don't vote for Romney.  But not voting, or voting for anyone but Romney, are just more votes for Obama.  Romney is not perfect and he is not our favorite, but he is a whole lot better than the inept, grossly negligent community organizer that has done everything in his power to destroy America and may just succeed if he gets another four years.  It is abundantly clear that the content of Obama's "Little Black Box" is not what is good for America.  

 

One could ask, how long will it be before an Obama or succeeding government forms Hitler-type youth camps to fill up young children's "Little Black Boxes", for diabolical (or political) purposes ..... to create little spies to rat on the dissenters and to control the minds and behavior of an entire country?  Could it come in the form of government-operated pre-schools, like has been proposed by the Obama Administration?   If you don't believe that this is happening, read Beverly Eakman's article entitled "Obama's Early Learning Challenge and our Failed Education System", then decide!

October 28, 2012

Deceitful Obama Administration Lies To America To Save Campaign After Willful Inaction Causes Deaths Of American Patriots

by Dr. Alan Bates, MD

Here are facts with enormous implications for the Obama Administration and the elections regarding the Benghazi attacks gathered from over 120 diplomatic cables (some of which have been reportedly leaked by someone in the State Department) and analyzed by multiple reliable sources including FOX News and Veteran Defenders of America.  Prior to September 11, 2012 there were increasingly frequent requests by CIA and diplomatic staff  in Libya for increased security at  the  U.S. consulate (which had already been attacked twice,  in April and June of this year),  the latest occurring the day of a pre-planned mortar attack by Islamic extremists on both the consulate, and five hours later the CIA annex where two SEALs were killed on the rooftop  while manning a machine gun position. The two SEALs even provided the coordinates of their attackers to a  Special Ops C-130 crew flying nearby but to no avail. 

These events raise questions in two areas.  First,  why were requests for increased security turned down for months and who was responsible?  Second,  those in the White House situation room which included the President’s national security advisor viewed the attacks in real time via two unmanned drones.  During that time urgent help was requested by Ambassador Stevens, soon followed by a request from two (now-deceased) SEALs at the nearby CIA annex that they be allowed to assist the consulate staff.   All requests were denied. Why and by whom?  Hours later, urgent help was requested at least twice by those at the CIA annex when they came under attack—and that was also turned down.  It all lasted seven hours.  Military aid was available within a half hour (F16s within 20 minutes, Apache helicopters within one hr, and a  C-130 gunship flying nearby).  This weekend, according to CIA director Petraeus,  no one in the CIA refused requests to assist the trapped Americans in Benghazi.   The protocol is for such aid to be dispatched when needed per the military or CIA  UNLESS overridden by the Commander-in-Chief.  And that is Obama.  Obama instead went to bed so he could get up the next morning to fly to a fundraiser in Las Vegas while four Americans died without the assistance they had requested. Why did Obama not approve military assistance?   Why did Obama and Hillary Clinton along with others in the Administration lie to the media, Americans and above all,  to the families of the deceased that a video clip produced on the West Coast was responsible for a ‘protest’ in which our men died, when they knew in realtime the reality of a terrorist attack and even the radical militants who claimed responsibility for that attack?  As an aside, why is that video clip producer in jail until after the election and denied access to the press?   Finally, why is the mainstream press trying to ignore these questions?   Collusion!

It is obvious to anyone with cerebral circulation that the Obama Administration had an agenda which supersedes protecting our personnel in the Middle East.  Could his motive to not provide enhanced security in Libya have been to maintain a low profile towards the locals in Libya?   Did Obama deny help to our ambassador and SEALs in order to protect his campaign myth that taking out Osama Bin Laden  extinguished much of the terrorist threat from Al-Qaeda?   What other explanation is there--incompetence? It appears that Obama and his minions propagated a cover up story to protect his political objectives at the expense of American lives and ultimately American trust (if there was any left).   These are not the actions of an honorable patriotic president.   Barack Obama appears to be a heartless coward and a liar who should pack his bags and vacate his office and take his Secretary of State with him.

Anyone who is aware of the many coverups which place Americans and our nation at risk and who would still vote for the narcissist anti-American in the White House either has no honor or has not been paying attention to them---like Fast and Furious; like the hundreds of EPA rules coming out right AFTER the elections which will drive up energy prices to unprecedented levels by slapping more regs on the energy industry which will be passed on to consumers; like ordering defense contractors who will lay off workers to defer such announcements until AFTER the election despite a law which requires at least 60 days notice; like cutbacks in Medicare by 716 billion dollars to fund Obamacare AFTER the elections.  There are many more.

The BOTTOM LINE:  This election differs from any other during my lifetime.  America is at a fork in the road between unrestrained dictatorship and a free republic.  If you choose to continue the destruction of our republic,  vote for  Barack  Obama,  the amateur, dishonest, egocentric Marxist with deep racist views, who openly disrespects American exceptionalism, our Constitutional freedoms with limited government, the rule of law,  and our military service people by imposing political correctness, disarming our troops at inopportune times, and providing classified intelligence to certain American newspapers and our enemies. Obama was elected on an empty promise for undefined ‘hope and change’ by naive uneducated voters, the Left, and those who wanted to elect the first black president without regard for his qualifications.   Our only chance to reverse the destructive course of the past four years is to vote for former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, an experienced, honest, charitable, business-savvy, pro-Constitutional, the non - racist candidate with a successful bipartisan track record, who respects American exceptionalism and the military strength to defend our freedoms. Romney is the only rational choice if America is to see security through true economic recovery, energy independence, fair trade, removal of oppressive regulations which constrain small businesses which provide the majority of jobs, and most importantly, repealing misguided destructive, bankrupting Obamacare.  Your choice is that between preservation of the American dream for our children, or the Left’s transformation of the once strongest, most prosperous country on Earth to a Marxist regime or worse.  Do not take your freedom for granted! 
Copyright 10/28/2012 by Gulf1

 A DANGEROUS AND MOMENTOUS ELECTION
IS

STRAIGHT AHEAD

October 1, 2012 TPATH
By Dwight Kehoe

Darlene Ewing- Dallas County Democrat Chairman
HYPOCRITE and LIAR

October 1, 2012 TPATH-
THREE ISSUES POINTING TO ONE BIG NIGHTMARE

1. - What you will see when you view the video linked here, is not only happening in Texas, but all across this country.  These criminals speak of "voter suppression" by the Republicans, while presenting zero proof and at the same time boldly and unabashedly lie when they say there is no evidence of people voting illegally.

After listening to this political hack, the reporter needed  to ask her these questions, of course he didn't, so I will.

1)  Miss Ewing, why would you not want the deceased to be removed from the registration roles? 
2) What dead person would be denied his/her right to vote?
3) Why would you campaign to keep those names on the list if you did not intend to use them in some illegal way?


2. - Now watch this video by Bradlee Dean and see if Ms. Ewing's comments about voter fraud are even remotely honest.



3. - The third and most scary point is made up of several parts, but explicitly tied together.  Much has been said and reported on the over 900 executive orders Obama has signed in his 4 years of destroying our country, and even though many of those were actually continuations and embellishments of previous EOs, the ones he has authored and signed, are frightening.

One after another of these executive orders give the President the authority to end every individual right afforded to us by our Constitution and with no controlling parameters.  Just his decision. This would be dangerous enough with a normal President, but in the hands of this one, it will be devastating.

And one very disturbing Executive Order he just signed, Executive Order 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of "increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis".

Can anyone deny that condition exists now, at this very moment?

Now, couple that information with the history of leftist governments and mass murder of their own citizens in order to stay in power, the Executive Orders which allow for the end of civil rights, along with reports that have been sent to TPATH that Obama and his Marxist cronies, unions such as SEIU and other leftist groups, have organized to the point where 250,000 people will claim they were denied the right to vote if Obama loses on November 6th.

Along with "international tensions, economic crisis and massive numbers of American voters being denied the right to vote, how far off would Executive Order 11051 be?

We need to stay vigilant, but it may be too late.  You need also to prepare. It could get very ugly.

Obama Incites Middle East toward Chaos and Murder
by Sher Zieve,
Posted October 3, 2012

 If you plan to vote for Obama in the 2012 elections, you have identified yourself as being in favor of ending the United States of America and of willingly accepting your position as one of Obama’s slaves.

Observation: I suppose you can aspire to being one of his House Slaves.

You will, also, be voting for the Obama syndicate’s dictatorship over you, your families and all of your yet-to-be-born (if you will even be allowed to procreate at all) progeny. For seniors, your fate is already sealed if Obama retains the Office of the Presidency of the US. He has already stolen $716 Billion from Medicare in order to finance his ObamaCare…which is designed to build his empire out of his newly-formed population of financial and religious (soon-to-be Islam only) slaves.

You didn’t think Team Obama was really planning to provide you with healthcare…did you? Heck, he has a 15-member non-healthcare/non-financially savvy Death Panel which is now poised to say who may live and who must die. Not an exaggeration, folks. Have you actually read the passed-by-the-Democrat-Congress-against-our-will ObamaCare? By the way, for you liberals/leftists in the crowd--you don’t believe that you will be saved do you? If you do, welcome to the Obama Surprise Team. Maybe they will be compassionate and allow you to choose your manner of death.

Since Obama issued his Executive Order to install Amnesty for illegal aliens the EO itself is illegal as he does not have the authority under the [now Obama-discarded] US Constitution) and now said illegals are affecting unprecedented break-ins into the homes of US citizens living close to the US-Mexico border. The rate of these break-ins (see URL for source graph below) has risen exponentially from the date that Dictator-in-Chief Obama issued his criminal Executive Order.

Recently, Obama’s foreign policy (specifically the Middle East) appears to have--by design--weakened the USA almost to its [our] breaking point. Obama hopes this will help him be re-hired, as he is counting on many to not want to switch horses in midstream if there is the chance of a war beginning. Don’t agree that he would do that? Really? Can any POTUS--let alone the Left’s “brilliant” messiah Obama--be that stupid? Well, let’s take a look!

 OBAMA
LIAR, RACIST,
 AND
ONE WHO CARES NOTHING
 FOR THE PLIGHT OF MINORITIES

October 5, 2012
By Dwight Kehoe
TPATH

October 5, 2012 TPATH- When TPATH makes accusations such as today's headline a "question mark" is sometimes added for the sake of giving the benefit of the doubt.

There is no question mark on this headline.

That is because the evidence presented here is firm, proven and undeniable.  The man sitting in our White House is indeed a liar, a racist and has used his vote as a Senator to deny aide to the victims of Katrina, for the sole purpose of political advantage.

So, by now, most of us have seen the tape of Senator Obama giving a speech to a predominately black crowd in Hampton University when he was Senator Obama.  Some, even Conservative super stars such as Glenn Beck have dismissed this video as, here we go again, "old news" and unimportant.

They have missed the most important aspect of this
very telling and revolting video.

Alright so Obama goes into a sing-song, black or southern preacher drawl, while speaking to the crowd even though his only time spent in the south was for a few golf outings. That of course was pandering and blatantly insulting to those gathered to hear him speak.  It showed a phoniness that many politicians have in their DNA.

But this performance was worse than that, much worse.

First a bit about what he said in that speech.  You can see the full video here  if you think it has been long enough since you have eaten last to keep from losing it. 

He told his audience that the US Government, which meant President Bush in particular and white people in general, do not care if blacks were suffering as a result of Katrina and then he referenced a Federal law, the Stafford Act.

This law, which requires states that receive Federal dollars to match small percentages with state funds, so that the US taxpayer would not be required to foot the entire cost.

His statement was race baiting and inflammatory enough, on it's own.

But people, hold on to your hats, that is not the half of it.  

The Stafford act has been waived several times in the case of very devastating disasters.  One case in point was after Florida was hit with several hurricanes.

Glenn Beck and others who think this speech is of no consequence, pay attention here, President Bush asked the Senate to take a vote that would waive the Stafford Act for New Orleans which would allow for the immediate federal aide of over $7 billion to be delivered to New Orleans without them being required to match funding percentages.

The Senate voted on this waiver, it passed but, but read this clearly, Senator Obama voted "NO". 

Then, just 10 days after he voted not to waive the Stafford Act, this lying, race hustler told those at the university,  white people wouldn't help "those in New Orleans", (the implied charge here is because 'those' people are black) when in fact, despite his voting to deny them funds, the money had already been transferred to New Orleans, and Obama knew it.

Ladies and gentlemen, should it not matter what party you belong to in order to be repulsed by this effort, by this man, who was soon to be President, of all the people?  To be engaged in such deceit and intentional divisiveness without being held to account by the so called journalists may well spell the doom of our Republic.

What question should next be asked concerning the motives of a Senator who would vote not to help people in desperate need?  Did he vote no, so he could continue to accuse "white people" and President Bush of racism?  You will have to decide that for yourself.

When his "no vote" failed to stop funds from flowing to New Orleans did he let that stop him from engaging in the ultimate hypocrisy when he stood there, blamed Bush for something that did not happen, even though he did all he could to make it happen?

So, it appears he was willing to let the people in New Orleans suffer and die in order to make political hay and when his vote failed to produce that calamity, he chose to show those he was speaking to just how little he thought of their intelligence by trying to incite hatred with his lies.

If anyone thinks, for even one second, that this man has changed or has the character to lead the greatest country God has ever given mankind, and if you pundits can still look at that video and determine it has no relevance to the man and what he will do if allowed to continue, there may in fact be no hope for our future.

October 5, 2012 TPATH

 US UNEMPLOYMENT DROPS
BELOW 8% ?

BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS
FOLLOWS ORDERS WELL

October 8, 2012 TPATH

October 8, 2012 TPATH - In the beginning of this year, Rush Limbaugh predicted the national unemployment number would drop below 8% this October.  All of us who love and admire Rush know he is not a world class economist.  And at the time he predicted this, there were no signs of the economy improving.  Yet, he hit it out of the park.  How did he do that?

He knew that Obama's policies were designed not to improve and grow the middle class or the economy, but to destroy it, and with the compliance of the media, blame Republicans and the free market.

What Rush is an expert on is history and leftist politicians.
Never in American politics has a sitting President been reelected with unemployment 8% or higher.  Who else knows this?  The person posing a "President of All the People", Obama.

Because the method and means the BLS use to crunch the numbers are kept under tight security, with just a few statistics revealed, they could very well have come up with any number the Obama demanded.  And they did.

Here are some facts that fly in the face of all common sense relating to this bogus report these sycophants hoisted upon the American people this week.

1. How many times during the last 4 years has the monthly unemployment number been adjusted the following month?
  Answer: Over 40 times.

2. How many times was the error in favor of Obama?
  Answer: Just about 100% of the time

3. The two top Labor Statistic people who are charged with putting out the final numbers donated the maximum amount to what candidate?
  Answer: Obama.

4. Economists agree that new jobs for any given month must total between 150,000 to 250,000 just to keep the unemployment rate from dropping.  How many new jobs were created in September?
  Answer: 114,000 (And the rate dropped to under 8%?).

5. What happens to the value of a quotient when the value of the dividend is reduced in relation to the divisor?
 Answer: The value drops ( As in from 8.2 to 7.8).

6. How many people have been removed from the equation calculating the number looking for work (the dividend) since the beginning of this year?
 Answer: 1,400,000 (that's people dropped and not counted).

7. It is a fact proven over and over again and agreed to by economists, that factory orders and production must rise in relationship to rising employment.  How much did that number increase during the period that BLS tells us employment rose?
 Answer:  It did not rise, it fell.

8. Everyone knows that "government jobs" produce no growth in the economy. Conversely, they add to the burden of the taxpayer and every dime of those new salaries has to be paid for, now or in the future, by those actually producing something.  If the government hired, let's say, 600,000 new employees over the last 3 months would that help the unemployment rate drop?
Answer: Ask the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

9. How many new government employees have been hired in the last 3 months?
 Answer: 600,000 (How convenient!)

10. What are are the chances that when the October unemployment statistics are released in November, just after the election, that the 7.2% rate for September will be adjusted to back over 8%?
 Answer: 100%

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
One more thing to ponder as we move towards November.  It is very easy to elect a Marxist, nearly impossible to vote him out.
Just ask the poor souls down in Venezuela.
Win, lose or draw, Chavez is not going anywhere.

WHAT IS OBAMA HIDING?

Opinion By:
Dwight Kehoe
TPATH

Kidnapping and Trade swap deal gone bad?

October 24, 2012 TPATH -  Late last evening FOX News broke the amazing story that has proven, beyond a doubt, that Obama and his administration knew immediately that the attack on the US Consulate in Libya was being done by armed and organized terrorists. 

The cable TV shows, thus far, are abuzz with this news but, they are asking the wrong questions.  The speculation is, that they fabricated and lied to  obscure the erroneous declarations of Obama relating to Al Qead's decimation and degradation. Ladies and gentlemen, not a chance.

Here is what we now know:
1. Just two hours into the attack on the consulate Obama and the State Department knew it was under a military style assault.

2. They had real time video being taken by drones.

3. Three brave American heroes fought off the
overwhelmingly superior forces for almost 7 hours before the compound was breached. 

4. Obama never made a move to help them when jets could have been scrambled and been there in in time to possibly scare off the attackers with a strafing run.

5. For five hours after the White House was informed, those men battled to hold the compound while Obama, reportedly went to bed.

6. Earlier in that day, the Ambassador sent emails warning of the impending danger and the White House did nothing to bring assets in to help.

So the question that needs to be asked is, why.  Why would the President allow a 7 hour siege to take place without lifting a finger to help?

Is it possible Obama knew this attack was going to take place and in fact was in cahoots with the fanatics?  It appears now that the only security that was supposed to be there were local Libyans and the three American heroes were  there just by chance.

So we are supposed to believe that Obama refused to send more security, refused to try to save the Ambassador, spent time creating a lie about some goofy video, all to cover up the fact that Al Qeada is still a threat?

There has to be more to it than that. No one, not even Obama would let 4 Americans be slaughtered and burned to death for something so trivial.

So what was it?  Until the State Department comes clean, we are left with the only option and that is to speculate.

So speculate we will.  Suppose Obama had made a deal with, oh let's say a Muslim Brotherhood leader of a Middle East country to allow our Ambassador to be kidnapped and then traded for the Blind Shiek?  Obama could be seen as a hero for getting back the Ambassador and we would be told the Sheik would be imprisoned in that country where he was transferred to.

A nice little boost in the polls just before the election.

Would that not explain why Obama did nothing for 7 hours?  The hired Libyan guards were supposed to flee their post and let the Ambassador be taken?

But three American patriots were there and gave their lives in defense of their country.

Make no mistake, the italicized paragraphs above are just speculation. But until we get one from the White House that makes more sense than hiding the viability of Al Qeada, this and other speculation will continue.

This may grow into the largest scandal ever perpetrated on the America people.  Congress needs to bring every single administration official in to answer questions until we know why 4 Americans were left to die while the President went to bed.

THE AMERICAN MEDIA
DISGRACEFUL, UNPROFESSIONAL, TRAITOROUS

October 28, 2012 TPATH - Everyday the journalist impostors of this modern day contribute further to the eventual loss of the rights given to them by our Constitution.

It is no secret that Thomas Jefferson had no loss of love for journalists and the press.  But he did understand just how important the freedoms afforded them are, and that those rights would be the key to the continued  growth, prosperity and freedom of America.

As little as he thought of them, it's quite certain, even he could not have imagined how far they would eventually sink.  And how these modern day under cover agents of the progressive agenda, posing as journalists, will have disgraced their presumed profession.

The press was afforded special rights, even beyond those of normal citizens, and it was commissioned with the important job of watching over the government and protecting us from corrupt and dishonest leaders.  All leaders, not just those with an alternate ideology.

They have forsaken that right, that privilege and that honor, and hence they have forsaken our country and our Constitution.  

As they use the rights afforded to them, not for the good of all the people, but in support of their own agenda, what they in fact are forging, is the loss of those rights, as well as the eventual collapse of our Republic as envisioned by our Founders..

It is difficult to understand the thinking and alignment with the progressive left of the American journalist .  These people are educated and schooled with the ability to read and understand history.  Yet they continue to aide and abet their own demise.

The chronicles are consistent and undeniable.  Freedom of the press, anywhere in the world and anytime in recorded history,  when leftists get control of the government,  the right of free speech disappears, and so too do the journalists themselves. 

So, where did this start?  Shall we go all the way back to the 2008 campaign when the news media refused to look into a few important questions concerning Obama?

There was no Media interest in:
1. What kind of grades did Obama get during his college years?  What did he write? Did he actually write anything?

2. How often did Obama use drugs and where did he get them?  Did he use crack, speed, cocaine, LSD?  Where did he get money to buy drugs?  Did he ever sell drugs?

3. What was Obama's relationship with the Communist terrorist Bill Ayers?  Why did Bill Ayers' Communist father help Obama pay for college?

4. Why was Obama getting special treatment from Tony Rezco a convicted criminal?  How is it that Obama got a sweetheart land deal from him?

5. Why Obama spent 20 years in Rev. Wright's church?  Wright preached racism, anti-antisemitism and hatred for America.

6. Why did Obama hide his Passport?  Does that Passport indicate something about Obama's citizenship?

7. Why did Obama veto a bill, while a Senator, not once, but 4 times, that would have forced abortion doctors to save a baby born alive after a botched  attempt at abortion?

8. Why did Obama use and is still using a Social Security number issued to someone else in a state where he never lived?

9. What effect on Obama did the Communist Frank Marshal Davis have on him as he was shaped and molded during his informative years?

This non-action on their part is not incompetence.  It was and continues to be, dereliction of duty and intentional deception.

Now, as Obama sits in the position of President and Commander and Chief, the media cover up continues.

Here are a few of the latest examples:
1. Candy Crowley, during the second debate, after having been given information by the Obama campaign, used that information to help Obama support a lie.

2. Brian Williams, while interviewing Obama asked just one question about Bengahzi.  The question was not meant to illicit new information.  It was clearly a leading question intended to help Obama cover his butt.  The question suggested  that the attack on the so called Consulate was a "spontaneous terror attack".  This of course was meant to conceal the real facts that Obama did nothing to help save the lives of those heroes that day.  If NBC had an ounce of integrity left, Brian Williams would have been fired on the spot.

3. When asked where Obama was at the time the emails came into the White House asking for immediate support because of the on going attack, reporters were told they would not get an answer.  That should in itself be big news, but not to today's journalists.

4. The MSM don't seem to care that on one occasion Obama said he ordered all the support needed to save those people and on another day he said he never new they had requested support.  This too does not seem to be important.

5. It now appears that Obama and his administration watched for over 5 hours of a 7 hour struggle, where brave Americans fought overwhelming odds to protect the Ambassador.  Not only did they not send help, but it looks like a General who tried to help, was relieved of duty.  The only one with that authority was Obama. This too has been ignored by the MSM.

6. Valarie Jarrett, a progressive Communist is the one who appears to be making decisions for Obama.  By his own words she has been behind every move he has made.  It was Jarrett who kept Obama from taking out Osama Bin Ladin for months and the reason Pannetta gave the actual order to get him while Obama was on a golf course. What hold does Jarrett have on Obama? What does she know that gives her, an un-elected person, control over the most powerful man in the world?  Inquiring minds may want to know. But not the American media.

PANNETTA                                        JARRETT

To be fair, FOX cable news is asking questions and is trying to get answers.  But they are alone.

The National news media, which includes all the major networks and newspapers, have ignored these questions and have moved on to very important issues such as Mitt Romney's employee binder.

Ask yourself this question:  Can you imagine the nightmare of fighting off hundreds of terrorists firing mortars, machine guns and rocket propelled grenades, for hours, knowing there is help just minutes away, and knowing you have sent numerous requests for support, watching, looking, hoping and praying that help will come.  But it never does.  One after another, first by fire and then by explosions, each hero expires and finally, after 7 heroic hours, and one final look for arriving help, the last hero is lost.

Then ask yourself, what is more important:  Did Obama fire a general to keep him from sending help, did Obama go to bed to rest up for the next day's campaign event while the last hero was slaughtered, or is it Mitt Romney's binder?

STATE DEPT. EMAILS SHOW OBAMA LIED ABOUT BENGHAZI TERROR ATTACK

 by Penbrook One

IMPLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY:  Two months after the deadly terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya in which four Americans were slaughtered, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, the American people still have not been told the truth about what happened by the Obama administration.  Now, overwhelming evidence shows the Obama administration knew that terrorists were actively engaged in the attack as it was happening on September 11^th.

By Dan Crosby

Of The Daily Pen

NEW YORK, NY - A series of internal State Department emails reveals that within hours of last month's deadly consulate attack in Libya national security advisors report to Obama staff that Al Qaeda-tied group Ansar al-Sharia had claimed responsibility, according to reports by Fox News.

In spite of the recently publicized emails, the fraudulently ensconced Obama administration perpetuated a misleading narrative that the attacks were not the result of terrorists, but rather caused by an obscure internet video claimed by government officials to be offensive to Islam.

The lie by the Obama administration that the video incited “spontaneous riots” has been exposed after sources in Libya and at the State Department said that there was no riot at the time of the attack.

Despite the fact that the video has since been exposed as a fraud posted months before the attacks, the video’s creator was arrested and detained after charges of a parole violation were filed against him by federal law enforcement officers.

To date, no evidence has since been produced proving the video creator is actually the individual responsible for the video or that he was in violation of any parole conditions.  His identity has been kept secret leading many to believe that he may be a straw-man concocted by the Obama administration as a scape-goat.

As reported by Fox:  “The emails provide some of the most detailed information yet about what officials knew in the initial hours after the attack. And it again raises questions about why U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice, apparently based on intelligence assessments, would claim five days after the attack that it was a "spontaneous" reaction to protests over an anti-Islam film.

Ansar al-Sharia has been declared by the State Department to be an Al Qaeda-affiliated group. A member of the group suspected of participating in the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi has been arrested and is being held in Tunisia.

The emails obtained by Fox News were sent by the State Department to a variety of national security platforms, whose addresses have been redacted, including the White House Situation Room, the Pentagon, the FBI and the Director of National Intelligence.

Fox News was told that an estimated 300 to 400 national security figures received these emails in real time almost as the raid was playing out and concluding. People who received these emails work directly under the nation’s top national security, military and diplomatic officials, Fox News was told.

The timestamps on the emails are all Eastern Time and often include the subheading SBU, which is shorthand for “Sensitive But Unclassified.”

The third email came at 6:07 p.m. ET and was sent to a different email list but still includes the White House Situation Room address and a subject line of “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack (SBU).”

“Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli," the email reads.

Earlier emails did not go into who might have been responsible for the attack.

The first email indicates that U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and other personnel were “in the compound safe haven.” Officials later discovered that Stevens and three other Americans had died in the attack.

The first email was sent at 4:05 p.m. ET with the subject line: “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack (SBU).”

“The Regional Security Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack," the email reads. "Embassy Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well. Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four COM personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia is providing security support.

"The operations Center will provide updates as available.”

The second email came at 4:54 p.m. ET, with a subject line: “Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi (SBU)"

“Embassy Tripoli reports the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared. A response team is on site attempting to locate COM personnel.”

The emails on the day of the attack further challenge not only the initial statements made by administration officials like Rice about the strike, but also recent claims that they were only basing those statements on the intelligence they had at the time.

State Department official Patrick Kennedy recently testified to Congress that anyone in Rice's position would have made the same statements about the attack being spontaneous.

However, the newly uncovered emails clearly state the involvement of a militant group whose agenda is to establish an Islamic state in eastern Libya.

Despite this, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney backed up Rice on Sept. 18. He said: "Based on information that we -- our initial information ... we saw no evidence to back up claims by others that this was a preplanned or premeditated attack; that we saw evidence that it was sparked by the reaction to this video." Carney went on to say "that is what we know" based on "concrete evidence, not supposition."