Before It's News | People Powered News

Sunday, February 26, 2012

No to NDAA and its Enforcement and No to Forced RFID Chips in Your Body

by Dr. Laurie Roth, ©2012, Presidential Candidate

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

At the last meeting of the German Reichstag on March 23, 1933, Otto Wels was the only vocal objector to Hitler's Enabling Act, which ushered in the Nazi takeover of Germany

(Feb. 22, 2012) — History repeats itself again and again because most of us never learn how to confront evil in time to make a real difference. When we do recognize and attack evil, we forget the cost and the battle shortly thereafter. We become distracted with the pressures and diversions of life.

Evil is here and this is our chance to make a bold stand….not later.

America has been viciously assaulted and flipped off with the passing of the Obamacare bill, HR 3200, in March 2010 and the NDAA Bill signed into law Dec. 31st 2011. Both bills are completely unconstitutional, immoral, unethical, dangerous, intrusive, communistic and dictatorial. Any questions?
Obama Care – HR 3200 is unfolding its carnage now – forced RFID Chips

By March 23, 2013 we are all ordered to have RFID chips implanted into our bodies. Isn’t March 23rd an interesting day to force this by? It was March 23rd in 1933 that Hitler’s Enabling Act was voted into law, thus ending democracy and freedom in Germany. This RFID chip control scheme hides behind all the practical issues and terms….patient identification; health information to hold medical data; do patient surveys and hold records and billing information.

Do I even need to say this? Government has no right in our homes or IN our bodies. They can and do hide behind bastardized terrorist danger terms with the NDAA, health and medical records needs with forced RFID chips and invented crises as they go. It is the biggest cesspool of fantasies America has ever seen, coming at us with the Saul Alinsky gun barrels. Many of us will just take it.

Laurie, you are crazy. It is simply a national need to fight terror…wrong! It is simply a national need to organize our health care information and care…wrong! It is simply Obama’s best efforts to serve the country and solve some challenges…wrong and wrong!

Do you see it yet? Obama and his regime have activated at least 72 FEMA camps, will soon have a nation of submissive and gullible Americans submitting to forced chips in their bodies and national health care cards. Obamacare is the IRS-controlled tool to gain access and power over our bank accounts and use our health information for whatever political agenda and attack is planned at the time. Forget privacy. Forget safe and effective health care and forget timely health care. We will all be manipulated and forced to pay for abortions and care for illegal aliens. We will see forced end-of-life counseling for seniors and forced salaries for doctors.

As you are being turned into obedient, robotic widgets with your chip in your arm, the Obama ‘change’ for America will almost be complete. Smart Grid will control energy and electricity use in our homes; RFID chips will control our health, accounts and behavior; FEMA camps will attempt to control those of us who defy Obama and his minions while we are legally seized and taken there by our own military.

The battle is on. The election cycle is in our face between now and November 2012. Join me and draw a line in the sand and say NO to forced RFID chips and NO to any part of the NDAA bill or its UN-Constitutional enforcement. Keep your guns and buy more. Get to know your Sheriff and join your local Tea Party group or start one yourself. Go to: for more. Make your stand.

Join me and don’t just vote our country back, DEMAND our country and freedom back. Say no to RFID chips and no to NDAA madness.

If you agree with me, help me, a patriot – outsider to get elected as your President in November 2012. I need volunteers and donations to gain traction, get on the ballot and make this work. I will clean house, kick butt and serve America, God and our Constitution if you give me the chance.
Of Presidential Eligibility, Doubling Down and Linguistic Torts, Conclusion

by Joseph DeMaio, ©2012

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

The U.S. Congress convenes at the U.S. Capitol building, which is at the center of the legislative district of Washington, DC

(Feb. 26, 2012) — [Editor's Note: In this concluding section of Mr. DeMaio's four-part series on presidential eligibility, the meaning of "natural born Citizen" as utilized in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, and the efforts made by Atty. Jack Maskell of the Congressional Research Service (CRS) to convince his presumed readership that a jus soli birth is sufficient to qualify for the presidency, DeMaio questions whether or not an image posted on the internet meets the "Best Evidence Rule" as prima facie evidence of Obama's birth as well as Obama's reasons for withholding the original allegedly retrieved by his lawyer from Hawaii. DeMaio raises the question as to how Obama legitimately claims "undivided allegiance" to the United States when his father was born a British subject and never became a U.S. citizen following his extensive analysis of the writings of Emmerich de Vattel, whose The Law of Nations described children born of citizen "parents" as "natural born."

The Congressional Research Services states that it employs "450 policy analysts, attorneys and information professionals in a variety of disciplines working in one of five research divisions. The breadth and depth of this expertise – from law, economics and foreign affairs to defense and homeland security, public administration, education, health care, immigration, energy, environmental protection, science and technology – enables CRS to mobilize quickly, working together in flexible groups to provide integrated analyses of complex issues facing the Congress." But have these "professionals," or more specifically, Maskell and his staff, produced not one, but three, memos with the disingenuous intent of convincing members of Congress - and the public, if they were to read them - that Barack Hussein Obama is eligible to the presidency regardless of the "natural born Citizen" clause of the Constitution?]


The CRSR relies throughout its 37,000 words on the English “common law” in support of its argument that, if a person was born “in” a country and “subject to its jurisdiction,” that person was a “natural born subject” of the King of England. Ergo, the Founders must have thought the same thing when they utilized the term “natural born Citizen” in the Constitution. Case closed.

Not so fast.

If reliance on the English “common law” by the CRSR is proper with respect to questions regarding the meaning of “natural born Citizen,” similar reliance on other facets of the “common law” should be equally applicable. While the CRSR seeks to “evade” the evidentiary principle of the “Best Evidence Rule” by approving the inferior mechanism of first posting by the White House to the Internet (in June 2008) an image of Mr. Obama’s so-called “short form certificate” and then, in April 2011, similarly posting his so-called “long form birth certificate.” Both posted images have been roundly denounced by computer forensic experts as being Adobe Photo-shopped frauds, and poorly-executed ones at that. As another website interested in seeking the truth has asked: “Where’s the Birth Certificate?”

Turning to the tome relied upon by the CRSR for its expositions of the “common law” – Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England – we find in Book III, Ch. 23 at p. 368, dealing with evidentiary principles with respect to “Private Wrongs” the following:

“AGAIN; evidence in the trial by jury is of two kinds, either that which is given in proof, or that which the jury may receive by their own private knowledge. The former, or proofs, (to which in common speech the name of evidence is usually confined) are either written, or parol, that is, by word of mouth. Written proofs, or evidence, are, 1. Records, and 2. Ancient deeds of thirty years standing, which prove themselves; but 3. Modern deeds, and 4. Other writings, must be attested and verified by parol evidence of witnesses. And the one general rule that runs through all the doctrine of trials is this, that the best evidence the nature of the case will admit of shall always be required, if possible to be had; but, if not possible, then the best evidence that can be had shall be allowed. For if it be found that there is any better evidence existing than is produced, the very not producing it is a presumption that it would have detected some falsehood that at present is concealed.” (Emphasis added).

By continuing to assert that the image of a document posted to the internet and claimed to be the original of a birth certificate is all that is needed to settle the issue, the CRSR merely compounds its error and hypocrisy. That hypocrisy was unmasked here by analogy to one of the surrealist painter René Magritte’s most famous works: The Treachery of Images. Painted beneath the image of a brown pipe, in French, are the words: “Ceci n’est pas une pipe.” Translation: “This is not a pipe.” The truth is that in fact, the image is not a pipe but instead is a picture of a pipe. Magritte is reputed to have commented when asked about it: “Of course it is not a pipe. Just try filling it with tobacco.”

A fourth-grader – but apparently neither the mainstream media nor the Congressional Research Service – could see the analogy here: the electorate, the people as a whole and, indeed, the populations of the entire planet are being asked to accept… correction, told… that the Internet images of two documents purporting by their presenters to be “proof” that Mr. Obama was born “in” Honolulu, Hawaii as thus, “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States” and rendering him a “natural born Citizen” under Art. 2, Sec. 1, Cl. 5 of the Constitution, are all that is needed to confirm his constitutional eligibility and silence any opposing views.

Really? Raise your hand if you believe that you can take your laptop, iPhone or iPad down to the Passport Office, pull up an image of something you claim is your original birth certificate, and get a passport. Raise your hand if you think you can establish entitlement to Medicare or Social Security benefits in the same way.

If, in fact, two original seal-embossed original long-form birth certificates were obtained by Mr. Obama’s lawyer, Ms. Judith Corley, of the Perkins Coie law firm from the Hawaii Department of Health in April 2011, why have they not been made available for independent, forensic examination? The “press gaggle” display orchestrated by White House press flack Jay Carney and the “I-felt-the-raised-seal” assurance by NBC reporter Savannah Guthrie fall so far short of satisfying even the minimum standards of the Best Evidence Rule that, were he now alive, Sir William Blackstone would promptly die laughing.

And yet not only is the electorate lampooned for even thinking of snickering over the spectacle, Mr. Obama continues to pay his attorneys real money to resist any efforts to get a court of law to address the issue, and the Congressional Research Service continues to produce “product,” assuring everyone – and especially everyone in a position to ask really hard questions in the Congress – that there is no need for further inquiry.

Yet the questions remain:

Is the “raised seal” Ms. Guthrie assures us she “felt” from the Hawaii Department of Health, or might it be from some other Hawaiian governmental office, say, for example, the office of Governor Neil (“I ♥ Obama”) Abercrombie?
Has Governor Abercrombie (or another Hawaiian official) signed the additional certification required under 28 U.S.C. § 1739 for the purported “birth certificate” to be accorded “full faith and credit” under the Constitution, as discussed in the CRS Memo of March 18, 2010?
Do the purported “original” documents in the possession of Mr. Obama or his lawyers – there shielded by the attorney-client privilege – match the documents posted to the internet?
Was the request for the certified copies of the originals transmitted through Mr. Obama’s lawyers in order to interpose let another layer of secrecy – attorney-client confidentiality – over the documents once placed into the lawyers’ possession?
Has anyone in the federal “Office if the Inspector General” seen or examined the documents purporting to be “genuine” certified copies of the original Hawaii Department of Health birth records against the findings and recommendations of the September 2000 report of the Inspector General entitled “Birth Certificate Fraud” found here?
Does the original Hawaii Department of Health microfilm or microfiche chronological record of births taking place in 1961 explain or answer the “anomalies” present in Mr. Obama’s proffered “birth certificates” as compared to the then-contemporaneous certificates of other persons born in Honolulu that year?
If his father was a natural born British subject under the British Status of Aliens Act of 1914, and under British statutory as well as “common law” the children of such natural born British subjects, wherever born, are themselves natural born British subjects, what is the basis for Mr. Obama’s claim of the undivided allegiance to the United States required under the Constitution?
If the British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act of 1943 applied to Mr. Obama’s father, was Barack Hussein Obama’s purported Hawaiian birth ever “registered at a consulate of His Majesty” as contemplated under the Act?

The CRSR’s repeated claim that the Internet image, as opposed to the original, seal-embossed document claimed to have been supplied by Hawaii officials, suffices is absurd. The image does not satisfy either the federal law on “prima facie” evidence of a document nor does it satisfy the “Best Evidence Rule,” which (to quote one of the CRSR favorite authorities, Blackstone) has been a part of the common law since written documents were first proffered in evidence. Moreover, the CRSR reprises its misplaced reliance on Liacakos v. Kennedy, 195 F. Supp. 630 (D.D.C. 1961) (previously discussed and dismantled here, contending that “even a delayed birth certificate produced by the plaintiff, issued by the State of West Virginia 46 years after the alleged birth there, would provide prima facie evidence of “natural born citizenship.” See CRSR at 42.

Quite apart from the fact that Mr. Liacakos produced the original document and not an Internet image of the document, the decision, like the CRSR, improperly conflates and equates a “native born citizen” under the 14th Amendment to a “natural born Citizen” under Art. 2, Sec. 1, Cl. 5 of the Constitution. Accordingly, any and all discussion in the case regarding the presidential eligibility clause and/or the term “natural born Citizen” used therein is, as in Wong Kim Ark, dictum. Pure and simple.

Blackstone’s evidentiary rule is carried forward to today’s Rule 1002 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, requiring that: “To prove the content of a writing, recording or photograph, the original writing, recording or photograph is required, except as otherwise provided in these rules of by Act of Congress.” See, generally, McCormick on Evidence, § 233. Since no other evidentiary rule or act of Congress exists which would obviate the need for the original of the purported certified copy of Mr. Obama’s long-form birth certificate, including the raised certification seal, the April 27, 2011 Internet image, as well as the anemic CRSR attempt to validate it, are worthless to resolve the question. Worse, they are disingenuous efforts to camouflage the truth – whatever that truth may be – regarding all of the circumstances attending Mr. Obama’s birth.

Finally, the hypocrisy of the CRSR’s position that the Internet images should be all that is needed, because the “original” sealed certificates were obtained from the Hawaii Department of Health by Mr. Obama’s lawyers, is manifest. One need look no further than the principles of the “common law” as articulated by Blackstone above quoted: “…the one general rule that runs through all the doctrine of trials is this, that the best evidence the nature of the case will admit of shall always be required, if possible to be had.” (Emphasis added). The circumstance that the original birth certificates – if indeed they exist – are in the possession of Mr. Obama or his lawyers, but that they don’t want to disclose them, does not render them other than “possible to be had.”

More importantly to the Best Evidence Rule issue, however, are the words of Blackstone following those just quoted. “[I]f it be found that there is any better evidence existing than is produced, the very not producing it is a presumption that it would have detected some falsehood that at present is concealed.” Really? There is a potential that a “falsehood that at present is concealed” might be perpetrated by allowing into evidence something other than the genuine original of the document? Imagine that. Secreting away from evidentiary disclosure the original of a genuine document which one does not want to disclose cannot justify the substitution of a purported “copy.” Moreover, it raises the presumption that the person refusing to disclose the original in his/her possession does, in fact, have some falsehood concealed or some truth preferred kept secret.

It is important that one focus on the word “presumption,” as it has legal significance. Here, since the purported originals, certified and bearing the requisite seals, are known to be in the possession of Mr. Obama or his lawyers, it is those documents – not photocopies handed out a press conferences; not pictures of birth certificates posted to the Internet; and not parol (verbal) statements claiming to have “seen and touched the originals and the raised seal” – which alone will satisfy the Best Evidence Rule.

In any instance other than the present one, where the President of the United States of America or his lawyers were in possession of the original of a document which could, to a high degree of certainty, establish whether he/she was eligible to serve, or instead was a usurper, the mainstream media would be in 24/7 soprano apoplexy screaming for its release… especially if the President were a Republican. See, e.g., United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). Instead, the erstwhile “Fourth Estate” which has served the nation since before it was a nation seems to have come down with a terminal case of laryngitis. One wonders if there is anything in the behemoth known as “Obamacare” which might address the ailment.

Sad… very sad, indeed.

Why Now?

The nagging question of “why now?” continues to perplex. After all, if the series of prior CRS Memos, the successful marginalizing of the “birthers” by virtually all media outlets and journalists and the deepening sycophancy of Mr. Obama’s supporters have all combined to create the perception that, in fact, if you even dream of questioning Mr. Obama’s eligibility, you are a nut-case…. why is there a need now for yet another novelette on the topic, the November 14, 2011 CRSR? Stay with me, as what follows may qualify in some peoples’ eyes as “Area 51” material.

The timing of the release of the CRSR merits examination, as does the audience to which it may have been disseminated. Specifically, the release comes at a time when it is unlikely that the U.S. Supreme Court – even if otherwise inclined – would have time to accept jurisdiction over and render a decision on the constitutional eligibility issue before November 6, 2012, now less than 9 months away. Indeed, as previously noted, there is even a suggestion from sitting Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas that as to appeals drawing into question the president’s constitutional eligibility, the Court is “… evading that one.” It is interesting that Justice Thomas, in explaining why the Supreme Court has not yet taken up an “eligibility” case on the merits would select the term “evading” as opposed to “avoiding,” since the prior term suggests a conscious decision to shirk or avoid a known obligation.

In addition, however, it cannot (or should not) be ignored or forgotten that to the extent other individuals having presidential aspirations or being “rumored” as possessed of “presidential or vice-presidential timber” may also have eligibility issues impacting them – including Florida Senator Marco Rubio and/or Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal – the release of the CRSR might well have the effect, whether calculated or not is a separate question, of fortifying in those persons’ minds a belief that, in fact, they are constitutionally eligible as “natural born Citizens,” regardless of the citizenship of their parents at the times of their births. Such a scenario might also have the effect of cooling any ardor such persons might otherwise have to continue (or even begin) questioning Mr. Obama’s constitutional eligibility.

If the CRSR analysis is to be believed and accepted – as the CRSR seemingly wants the reader to do – then under the decision in Wong Kim Ark, Senator Rubio and Governor Jindal, among others, would be “deemed” eligible without the need for a Supreme Court decision or a constitutional amendment confirming same. If such a result found widespread appeal among such a persons’ supporters, it could have a significant impact on their willingness to persist in questioning Mr. Obama’s eligibility. On the other hand, if the original intent of the Founding Fathers as gleaned from sources dismissed or altogether ignored in the CRSR is found more to comport with the teachings of de Vattel and the apparent concerns of John Jay in writing to George Washington on the point, then Senator Rubio and Governor Jindal, as well as all others similarly-situated, and talented as they may be, would be ineligible, for they would not meet the definition of a “natural born Citizen,” at least as articulated by de Vattel.

Insidious and unlikely as it might seem, if one of the objectives of Mr. Obama’s supporters were to entice and tempt those in political parties other than his own – and perhaps even including Senators who might be called upon to voice any objections when the electoral college votes are tallied next January – to accept the CRSR and its reasoning in order to fortify their own proclivities or candidacies as a “natural born Citizen,” that would be an improper and unfortunate motivation. Indeed, such an objective, if the CRS were complicit, would reduce the Congressional Research Service into little more than a co-conspirator or lobbyist seeking to accomplish an objective through guile and cunning.

And that would be a bad thing…. would it not?

And so, he debate continues: is Barack Hussein Obama eligible – or ineligible and thus disqualified – to either serve as president or to be legitimately excluded from future election by virtue of the U.S. Constitution? While the person now “occupying” the White House marshals his supporters, enablers and lawyers to make sure the “response” to that question – not to be confused with an “answer” to the question – ratifies and confirms his continued residence there, substantial doubts and a growing mountain of evidence continue to accumulate indicating that, in fact and in law, not only is he ineligible under Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution,, a massive and unprecedented bamboozling of the American people, not just the electorate, has taken place. In fact, the ruse today continues to take place to ensure he stays there, including, at minimum, past November 6, 2012.

Aided and abetted by a mainstream media cabal that gives new meaning to the term “propaganda,” coupled with a somnambulant Congress seemingly more focused on individual members’ re-election than on adherence to the Constitution and rule of law, those who would have the temerity to even suggest that the issue of presidential eligibility should be examined have been relentlessly criticized, trivialized, marginalized, demonized, vilified and, finally, lampooned. And above it all wheels and dives Mr. Obama, not unlike a raptor scanning the ground – America – for more prey, his teleprompters locked and loaded. And yet, the constitutional eligibility issue remains. Why? Because one cannot rope-a-dope and dodge the public forever, because the truth will always come out. Always. In this regard, the U.S. Supreme Court may wish to revisit its not-infrequent citation to reports of the Congressional Research Service as a source of impartial and authoritative data.

The only remaining question of any relevance to the issue is whether enough of the electorate on November 6, 2012 will sip again Mr. Obama’s cocktail, a mixed adult beverage consisting of equal parts of hubris and arrogance, with a heaping dash of narcissism, and listen once more to his siren song of “hope and change” – along with another chorus of “it’s Bush’s fault” – to finally ensure that a nation once hailed as the planet’s last best hope for liberty and freedom crashes and burns like so many other failed nations of the past. Think “Yugoslavia.” Think “Greece.”

Since the judicial branch of the government – from the United States Supreme Court down to, for example, the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings – has shown approximately zero interest in addressing the issues on the merits, there is but one court remaining in which to seek redress, i.e., the Court of Public Opinion. There are times when the exigencies of a situation leave no option other than resort to the public: “we, the people.” If the Supreme Court is “evading” the issue, it is now up to the electorate to find the fortitude which apparently is lacking elsewhere.

Accordingly, assuming that these issues are not otherwise resolved before then, the final hearing on the matter will be held in that court on November 6, 2012. If you care about your country and its future, along with the future of your children, your grandchildren, and their great-great grandchildren, be in the courtroom – which is actually scattered across the nation in the form of tens of thousands of places called “voting booths” – on November 6, 2012. Unless, of course, either New Black Panther Party or SEIU “peaceful polling place monitors” intimidate you away or you actually prefer the “nation of men and not laws” that is being designed, assembled and imposed on Mr. Obama’s watch.

Yes, Virginia… it is that serious.
Obama Syndicate Plans Imminent Takeover of USA by Islam and Globalists

by Sher Zieve, ©2012

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

A "Global Caliphate Conference" is scheduled in the Vienna, Austria area for March 10, 2012

(Feb. 26, 2012) — While Congress ignores it (or secretly supports it), the US courts continue to fall one by one towards accepting and utilizing Shari’a law in place of US law and the wholly-owned-by-the-totalitarian-Left-and/or-the-Saudis (same thing) media continue their mindless and largely irrelevant programming (to continue the mesmerizing of the American people) Obama is openly supporting and assisting the Islamist takeover of the USA. I have been writing about this since prior to the Obama syndicate’s usurpation of the White House. However, it’s comforting to know that my more well-known brethren have at last gotten the message and are now, also, writing about it. In the end, we are all in this together!

Recently, Senior Fellow for European Politics at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Soeren Kern wrote in his article “Caliphate Conference” Seeks to Islamize Europe, U.S.”: “The explicit aim of the Istanbul Process — currently backed by the Obama administration — is to make it an international crime to criticize Islam. A Muslim fundamentalist group is organizing a conference focused on turning Austria and other European countries into Islamic states.

“The “Caliphate Conference 2012″ will be held on March 10 in the Austrian town of Vösendorf, situated just south of Vienna. The main theme of the event will be “The Caliphate: The State Model of the Future.”

“The conference is being organized by Hizb ut-Tahrir [Party of Liberation], a pan-Islamic extremist group that seeks to establish a global Islamic state, or caliphate, ruled by Islamic Sharia law.”

Shortly thereafter, WND published the article “Planning for Islamic Caliphate Begins” in which it exposes a December 2011 Islamist Conference held in Washington, D.C.–also with support from Obama–at which Sec. of State Hillary Clinton spoke in favor of the Islamists’ plans to stop anti-Islam speech in the USA. The “Istanbul Process” (also SURPRISE–SURPRISE is supported by the U.N.) would deny anti-Islamic speech, only, and if any anti-Muslim/Islam speech leads to said Muslims rioting and pillaging (which is what they do on a regular basis, anyway) the speaker would be held liable, jailed or worse.

The above is happening now. Source it for yourselves or take a look at the references below. This would also be an excellent campaign strategy for Obama…jailing anyone who has spoken out against the Satanic Islamic cult. That’s most–if not all–of we Constitutionalists.

So, we have a dictatorial group now ruling–not governing–us which has destroyed our jobs and is in the process of destroying the employers who provide those jobs. It is also gutting our US Treasury, taking our money and spending it on the globalists, Islam and whatever other groups wanting and working with Obama to destroy what used to be our country. This same Obama syndicate has ordered military drills (aka “urban warfare”) in many of our cities including, but not limited to, Los Angeles, Miami, Boston and Little Rock, has ensured that gasoline and energy prices are reaching unprecedented highs (how better to immobilize a population?), is beginning its takeover of raising our children (did you see the articles about the Obama Food Police checking 4-6 year olds’ lunches) and Michelle Obama has even limited how large candy bars are allowed to be. And, there’s always ObamaCare–which is much…much more than healthcare–looming darkly over us. So many more tyrannical dictates have been commanded by Obama that it would take several books to include them all.

How much more will it take, America, for us to rise up against this massive onslaught? Are we doomed to slavery, poverty and early death at the hands of the most corrupt and evil oppressors in human history or will we actually get off our collective derriéres and fight them? By the way, there is no time left. Decisions must be now or never and may the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob be with us.

“And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every
man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.”–Gen 16:12

“And at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him: and the king of the north shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over” –Daniel 11:40
What Happened to the Mavericks?

by Ron Ewart, ©2012

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

(Feb. 26, 2012) — “The kind of people I look for to fill top management spots are the eager beavers, the mavericks. These are the guys who try to do more than they’re expected to do – they always reach.” — Lee Iacocca

The other day we took in the big-screen IMAC show called “The Rocky Mountain Express.“ It told of the story of building the Canadian Pacific Railroad across the interior mountain ranges of British Columbia and finding a pass through the virtually impenetrable Rocky Mountains. While watching this documentary, the viewers were treated to a spectacular steam engine trip across the Canadian Pacific Line from Vancouver to Superior. The film described how one man, William Cornelius Van Horne, son of an Illinois dirt farmer, rose in the ranks of railroading from the tender age of 14, when his formal schooling ceased, to become superintendents and general managers of emerging railroads in America. A powerful figure of a man, this accomplished artist, violinist, and dedicated railroad engineer was asked by the Canadian Pacific Railroad Company, at the young age of 39, in the year 1882, to direct the construction of the transcontinental link from the harbor at Vancouver, British Columbia to Thunder Bay on Lake Superior.

An imposing figure with the seeming energy of five men, the mind of a true visionary and the drive to get things done no matter what lay in his path, built a railroad line across the mountainous interior of British Columbia and up and over and down the Rocky Mountains and across the southern prairies and wetlands of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontareio. Literally carved out of the sides of granite mountains, with looping tunnels, long, curving wood-frame bridges and perilous overhangs, Van Horn directed the construction of a railroad bed that most said could not be done. He finished the line in half the time he was given to complete construction. In one year he directed the laying of over 500 miles of track. That is one and a third miles per day, every day. However, in some areas of the right-of-way, the contractors and workers couldn’t average more than five feet per day. In many of those areas, the death toll was as high as five men per mile.

An excellent biography of Van Horne can be found HERE.

The writer sums up Van Horne’s biography with the following: Sir William C. Van Horne liked big things: the largest and best locomotives, the biggest salary earned by a North American railway executive, generous (sometimes double) meals, big Cuban cigars, the massive Camagüey hotel, the huge gardens and broad roof of his beloved Covenhoven, the unusually large rooms and high ceilings of his Montreal home, the size of many of his own paintings and most cherished works of art, the grandeur of the Rocky Mountains and the CPR’s hotels, his visions of world-wide systems of commercial transportation and trading, and the greatness of the British empire. This passion for bigness, complemented by a usually keen eye for detail, was matched by exceptional energy, vision, and enthusiasm which made it possible for Van Horne to achieve or obtain many of the great things he so prized. His interests were numerous and varied, but construction of the CPR was his greatest contribution to Canada. As a railway man, he had many rivals. Others were more successful as financiers, promoters, and lobbyists, but none equaled his achievement in the building and operation of integrated systems of railway transportation and economic development, first in Canada and later in Cuba.

This was a time in North America where impossible things were accomplished by visionary men, cooperative governments and willing investors, who saw the opportunities for opening up entire continents to growing populations. Telegraph lines paralleled railroad right-of-ways, extending communication across vast expanses of open territory. Messages and news flew across the land almost at the speed of light, where before it could take months by sea, or overland by pony express or horse-drawn coaches. Towns were built up around the railroad lines to exploit almost limitless agricultural, mineral and timber resources to build our growing nations. Time to cross the continent was reduced from several months to weeks or even days and a lot less dangerous.

People from the East poured into the midlands, the mountains and finally the Pacific regions by the tens of thousands, anxious to take advantage of the many brand new opportunities that awaited them. They faced terrible hardships, injury, Indians, disease and death, but still they came and they came because of the courage, determination and vision of big men with big ideas. They came because of the mavericks who would not heel to the prevailing wisdom or the doubters, mavericks that opened up corridors of transportation and communication that were absolutely necessary for an expanding nation of free men and women. These railroads and telegraph lines were the arteries that carried the blood of commerce and the nerves of communication to the heart and soul of the North American continent.

During this time in our two great nations’ history, there were mavericks in finance, steel, agricultural, construction, mining, timber, sea-going sail and steamships, merchandise and a whole host of other commodities that were carried overland by the railroads. These mavericks became immensely wealthy because of the risks they took, the grand visions they held and the extraordinary determination to see those visions become reality.

In those mid to late years of the 19th century, America and Canada were the lands of the men who COULD and DID. These were the men of “YES, WE CAN” and they did IT in spite of civil wars, recessions, strikes, declining finances, bankruptcies, fickle governments, corrupt politicians, the vagaries of ebbing and flowing markets and a myriad of other problems that plagued them as they moved forward towards the realization of the goals they set for themselves and others. Government didn’t get in the way then, like it does now. None of what was done to build Canada and America could have been done in today’s regulatory climate. It would have been impossible. We have now become a nation of “NO, WE CAN’T” because of those laws and regulations. We can’t even build a pipeline across the heart of America because of irrational environmental concerns and the corruption of party politics.

These fearless mavericks of the 1800′s were the leaders of men and others followed them because these men were going places and if you hung on tight, you might just go places too. Fortunes were made (and lost), not only by the builders of railroads, but by those that followed the railroads and set up shop along these two parallel ribbons of shiny steel that spanned a continent from sea to shining sea, steel that was forged in the great northern cities, cities that were built by other great men with vision.

Most of these mavericks were self-made and determined, if nothing else, as was William Van Horne. Many were ruthless without regard for human life and some were pure evil. They only saw their vision. They never saw the obstacles. They just rode over them because the pursuit of their vision blinded them to all of their obstacles. There was always away around the obstacles and if they couldn’t find a way, they would invent one. Many others died because of the visions of these determined men, but without those sacrifices, realizing these absolutely essential grand visions of transportation and communication corridors would probably have been impossible.

In retrospect, neither of our two nations could have grown at the pace we did, without such men. Both countries would have been stuck in a time warp, where there would have been no fortunes made, no large middle class, poverty would have been the norm and the growth of freedom would have been virtually impossible. Man is anything but free, if he must endure a perpetual hungry stomach.

There were other great men who came along in the Twentieth Century, like Henry Ford who gave us thousands of jobs and the affordable car and expanded exponentially, the mobility of the people of a growing nation to travel great distances. Other men of vision obliged with a new source of once-thought limitless fuel, pumped out of deep holes in the ground at great risk ….. crude oil! Government responded appropriately to this new mode of transportation by building an ever-expanding network of roads within cities, from city to city and farm to markets.

Great inventors like Thomas Edison and Nikola Tesla gave us the light bulb and electricity to power our homes, factories and businesses. Advances in medicine extended our life times by several decades. War machines were invented that allowed us to be victorious in two world wars and smaller battles that some say we shouldn’t have fought in the first place. These new technologies and vast raw materials allowed America to build the most powerful military machine that ever existed on this planet and it still will be if Obama can be stopped from gutting it.

Technology literally exploded in the Twentieth Century. From the telephone, to radio, to television, to microwave relays, to computers, to cell phones, to laser beams, to satellites and to GPS, life in America and across the globe took on a pace never before seen in all of human history. The planet was dramatically shrinking, literally by the day. The dreamers and visionaries in this technological expansion are too many to name here.

But some of these powerful men who made vast fortunes from building corridors of steel and those that provided the raw and finished materials and the funding for those corridors, turned their visions towards another goal. Their grand vision was the creation of greater wealth and the control of money on a global scale. Men like Vanderbilt, Rockefeller, J. P. Morgan, Davison, Vanderflip, Warburg and others decided that they could use their wealth to control nations by becoming the central banker for those nations and in 1913, several of these powerful, wealthy men, from a plan they hatched in a so-called “duck hunt on Jekyll Island“ in 1910, were successful in creating the Federal Reserve of the United States, a privately held bank owned by a whose-who of the elite, that is neither federal nor a reserve. The debate over the Federal Reserve rages on, over it being unaccountable to anyone and whether its policies work in favor of the United States, or in favor of the private owners of the Federal Reserve itself. A recent audit of the Federal Reserve leaves great, unanswered questions in this regard.

But we digress! The question raised by this column is, “What Happened to the Mavericks?” Does America still have some individuals that will cross boundaries, tame frontiers and go where other men are afraid to go? Of course. But we have conquered the continents, we have discovered the passes through the mountains, tamed the frontiers and the wild, untapped land we once were. That wild land and that frontier no longer exist. All we can do now is still fill in the gaps. Thus, the great men that were called on to open up this new land are no longer needed. The frontiers we now face are totally different. The next frontiers we will challenge won’t require the rugged individuals of by gone years. It will require a collection of individuals and a wide array of skills, new technology and new materials. There will be no quintessential, go-it-alone John Wayne, who will design, develop, build and ride his new rocket ship into the sunset ….. to explore the awaiting heavens.

Nevertheless, there is a certain kind of maverick that is needed now more than ever. He is the leader of men and women who will fearlessly rush in to tear down political fences, break up cliques, challenge the prevailing wisdom, break a few rules and drive a wedge into the domain of the powerful elites ….. in the name of freedom. His words will make the heart beat faster and when he tells those that will walk in his path to take a stand for liberty, they will not hesitate to take that stand.

Throughout history, such men have risen in times of enormous strife, to lead others against a great challenge and throughout history those great challenges have been vanquished by such men and those that will follow. During all of our wars, in small skirmishes or major battles, these men have risen out of nowhere to lead others to victory.

But the challenges we face today are totally different from the challenges of the past. We are confronted not by a vengeful enemy determined to kill us, although there are some of those, we are now challenged nationally by a cultural mindset that is embedded in the hearts of millions of the people themselves, a debilitating mindset that was put there on purpose by a government and an ideology that is wholly contradictory to and in conflict with the principles of freedom and liberty. The maverick that will rise to meet this almost silent, insidious challenge will have to possess the ability to get the people to reject this mindset that has invaded their hearts and their minds, without them knowing it. This maverick will have to be able to do what a general does in the heat of battle, when defeat is staring them in the face. This general has to convince his men to overcome their worst fears and charge into an impenetrable wall of hell fire. This ability to lead men into situations where the men’s own well-being or survival is on the line is a rare quality indeed. But these mavericks do exist.

Are there such men in America today? Sure! But we have not seen such an individual materialize out of no where as yet, an individual that has that special ability to unite a nation and lead that nation in the direction of freedom. Nevertheless, “The Parallax Prophecies” predicts that there is such a man (or woman) and he or she was born many years ago. The life of this individual has conditioned him for this moment, to suddenly arise out of no where and lead this great nation in the same direction that led those colonials who fled to a new land and a new continent across a great sea in search of freedom and away from religious persecution, almost 400 years ago.

When we least expect it, this man will raise his two outstretched arms above the multitudes and call on them to make the sacrifices necessary to preserve, protect and defend our great Republic and become a nation of “YES, WE CAN” again, so help them God! This special individual is out there. Do you see him? Can you find him in the crowd? Not likely. You won’t have to look for him though because this maverick will be looking for you and calling you to duty. The question is, how many will answer his call, will it be enough and will it be in time?

But wait a minute! As anyone can easily see, the arrival of our mythical maverick is long overdue. The accelerating methods being used by government and national and international special interests to “mold” American society and our children, are both overt and covert. They are working diligently to get into our children’s heads ….. and their stomachs, at very young ages for the purposes of indoctrination. Read about just one such overt method coming from that arrogant, out-of-control U. S. Department of Education, under their “Race to the Top” program, from the “Education Liberty Watch” website.

Ladies and gentlemen, if you have children in public schools, especially pre-school and kindergarten, you need to get off your chair and derail this program before it gets a foothold in your community.

On second thought, perhaps we don’t need a mythical maverick after all. And the situation is so dire we don’t have time to wait for him to appear anyway. Perhaps all we really need is a bunch of concerned citizens and some angry parents to take back America at the local level. Perhaps what we really need are a few million go-it-alone mavericks that will take on these bullies and give them “what for.” Perhaps you are one of those good ‘Ole American rugged individualists, like John Wayne, that will set an example for others to follow. The time is one minute before midnight. Your country needs you.

Ron Ewart, President


P. O. Box 1031, Issaquah, WA 98027

425 837-5365 or 1 800 682-7848

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

If There is NO Constitution, There is NO Fed


by JB Williams, ©2012

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Does the current federal government allow for "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?"

(Feb. 21, 2012) — Are Washington, DC politicians absolutely sure that they want to make the US Constitution null and void? If the US Constitution is null and void, then so is the union of states that it created, as that fragile union of sovereign states was very carefully ratified via a very specific and carefully crafted balance of power between the federal government and the states.

If the federal government continues to breach that compact without remedy, the union of states expires with the Constitution itself and it is every man for himself at that point. Are DC elitists ready for what comes with the decimation of the US Constitution and the union of states it created?

“We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

This is the sole purpose of the US Constitution. No constitution, no union…

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

The United States of America is a union of fifty sovereign states. That union is established by, and conditioned upon, the Law of the Land, the terms and conditions of the US Constitution. Without the US Constitution, there is no union of fifty sovereign states – there can be no United States of America. The people and the states have the right and the duty to protect and preserve liberty at all cost, and to force the Federal Government, if necessary, to live within Constitutional boundaries, or abolish this runaway government and start all over again.

Are corrupt DC elitists certain that they want to toy with the American people and the US Constitution, rendering the document nothing more than a relic from history and placing at risk the union of states it establishes?

The Federal commitment to Global Governance and UN Agenda 21 taken under the Clinton Administration in September of 2000 and followed by every administration since, is a direct violation of everything the US Constitution and fifty state constitutions stand for… it cannot be allowed to continue.

The 9th Amendment gives the people the right to reject unconstitutional acts by the Federal Government and the 10th Amendment gives the states the same power.

The notion that the Federal Government can make up the Law of the Land at will via executive, judicial or legislative fiat is insane on its face. The idea that the people are limited to the voting booth or a federal courtroom as their only remedy for a runaway federal government is equally insane.

If the 9th and 10th Amendments no longer stand, then the entire Constitution is null and void and the union of fifty sovereign states is also instantly voided. Before we dissolve this union and institute new government, laying its foundations upon that which will guarantee every citizen and state freedom and liberty, sovereignty and security, we must make every effort to save this union by re-establishing the balance of power at the foundation of the Constitution.

We shall not allow the US Constitution and the union it forms to perish without a fight.

Global Governance, my eye! The United States of America is ONE NATION, Under God, Indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for ALL. It is so, because the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights say so. Destroy that at the expense of the union itself!

Who are Bill Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama to say otherwise? Temporary residents of the people’s White House come and go. Freedom and Liberty are forever, because the American people say so and the American people are the final word on the subject.

State governments can stop the next Civil War by standing up and keeping their oath to respect, protect and preserve the US Constitution and force the Federal Government to live within the confines of that compact. They can do this by simply passing the Balance of Powers Act in their state and rejecting all “unconstitutional acts” of the federal government at the state line.

Or, they can sit on their hands, remain part of the problem and wait for the next Civil War to begin.

“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution;” – Article VI

According to Article VI of the US Constitution, every elected lawmaker and law enforcement officer in this country has the power and the duty to support, protect and defend the US Constitution and the Representative Republic it forms. No excuse from federal or state lawmakers or employees is good enough. It is time for true patriots to stand and be counted.

The Constitution prohibits any form of global governance, national or international dictatorship, or socialist experiment, be it democratically elected or not. The states must act or the people will have no peaceful alternatives.

Either way, freedom and liberty will be protected and preserved. The States can do it peacefully or the people will do it by whatever means necessary. The Second Amendment exists for just such an occasion.

Over the last 237 years, more than a million brave American men and women have fought and died for the US Constitution, our Representative Republic, freedom, liberty and justice for all. They did not die in vain.

The States can reassert proper constitutional balance of powers or the people will. It’s not a threat; it’s a prediction. Americans are the most peaceful and tolerant people on earth, until push becomes shove.

The clock is ticking…The States must act swiftly and decisively. Every patriotic American citizen must act as well, calling upon their state officials to take immediate measures to stop the runway Fed before we reach the point of no return.

Use the information linked in this column to become part of the solution. JOIN the real revolution to reinstate the US Constitution as the only Law of this Land.
Democrat Presidential Candidate Will Proceed with Eligibility Challenge Against Obama


by Sharon Rondeau

Cody Robert Judy is a Democrat Presidential candidate for 2012

(Feb. 21, 2012) — Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy has asked a Georgia court to allow him to proceed with a ballot challenge to Obama’s placement on that state’s ballot without an attorney.

Judy had been a plaintiff on a challenge filed by Atty. Orly Taitz in Farrar v. Obama, but last week, Georgia Superior Court Judge Cynthia Wright stated that Taitz would not be able to continue the case pro hac vice, meaning without the involvement of an attorney licensed in Georgia.

Judy told The Post & Email that he believes his motion contains “explosive” information which the court “will have to make a matter of record.” He also stated that as a Democrat contender for the presidential nomination, he possesses “competitive, legitimate standing” to challenge Obama’s eligibility. Judy reasons that “I’m a Democrat candidate against Obama. Republican candidates and Independent Candidates don’t even have their own parties’ nomination yet, the Court or a good lawyer would take that apart in a minute in the competitive standing argument.” A video produced by Judy about the Georgia ballot challenge is here.

Mr. Judy is a businessman and a published author who has previously run for U.S. Senate, U.S. House of Representatives, and President.

On September 3, 2008, before the presidential election, Judy had filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutional eligibility of both Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama. He was also a Friend of the Court in a case filed in federal court which was ultimately heard by Judge David O. Carter and dismissed.

On pages 5-6 of his filing with the Superior Court, Judy states, in part:

5) Mr. Judy is also the only candidate for President of the United States, in the United States of America at this time, that has a legal precedent and competitive standing in the contention of Barack Obama’s legal qualification as a natural born citizen since Mr. Judy is the only candidate who sued both Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama in 2008, as a Presidential Candidate, for not being qualified candidates under the qualification demands for President held in the vaults of the U.S. Constitution, and who has continued that contention as a candidate for President in 2012…

Judy told us that he has used the decision of a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to go forward with his ballot challenge. On May 2, Attys. Gary Kreep and Orly Taitz gave oral argument to three judges of the Ninth Circuit, who had appeared to indicate that the lawsuit was not filed at the proper time to challenge Obama’s eligibility. Obama’s attorney, David DeJute, appeared to agree when he stated, “I think a candidate can challenge the qualification of another candidate, assuming of course that candidate does so in a timely manner.”

Mr. Judy told The Post & Email that he plans to raise the matter of Senate Resolution 511, passed by the U.S. Senate on April 29, 2008, which declared John McCain a “natural born Citizen” with the assent of then-presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

An initial hearing took place in Atlanta, GA on January 26, 2012, after which Administrative Law Judge Michael Malihi ruled that the evidence presented was not “persuasive,” but a state case from Indiana which concluded that anyone simply born in the country was a “natural born Citizen” was persuasive. Malihi also opined that the evidence presented by six witnesses regarding alleged social security fraud and forgery was not persuasive. Malihi contended that his decision was “entirely based on the law.”

A challenge to Obama’s eligibility has recently been filed in Indiana. Other challenges to his candidacy have been filed in Missouri, New Hampshire, Illinois, California, New Mexico, New York, Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Texas.

In regard to his plan to move forward his eligibility challenge against Obama in Georgia, Judy stated, “I think it will be the first time a State Court has had the opportunity to consider all the evidence, with the requirements of ‘competitive standing’ and ‘political doctrine question’ answered for them, that normally get put into Federal Court.”

Friday, February 17, 2012

Breaking: U.S. Supreme Court Meeting Today on Health Care/Eligibility Challenge


by Sharon Rondeau

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Will the U.S. Supreme Court Decide to Hear Purpura v. Sebelius, which challenges Obama's eligibility to have signed the health care law?

(Feb. 17, 2012) — 11:49 a.m. ET – The Post & Email has just learned that the U.S. Supreme Court will be conferencing today to decide whether or not to hear the case of Purpura v. Sebelius, which challenges the constitutionality of the health care bill and Obama’s eligibility to hold office.

Plaintiffs Nicholas Purpura and Donald R. Laster, Jr. call their challenge the “We the People” brief.

Purpura stated that his case is “the best one” to challenge the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act passed in March 2010 by the 111th Congress and signed by Obama. He had submitted a Request for Reargument to the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the case on January 17, 2012.

Purpura has stated that “the reason they don’t want to take the case and why they’re most frightened is Count 6,” which claims that if Obama is not eligible to serve as President, the bill is null and void.

A prayer request was put out by Purpura, and today he stated that he is “getting calls from all over the country” in response to it. “People are praying at the Oklahoma Air Force base; people throughout the country…they’re even praying at the Supreme Court! They want their lawsuit heard,” he said.

A new 17-page brief with 15 pages of argument sent to the Supreme Court was dated January 27, with Purpura representing himself. “What I told them flat-out is that you have no choice but to hear this,” Purpura told The Post & Email. “Count 6 is the most important.”

Purpura also said that “Sotomayor and Kagan cannot hear this case” because of their conflict of interest, having been appointed to the court by Obama.

"Count 6" asks how Obama can "exercise the authority of the office of President" if he is not a "natural born Citizen"

Page 7 explains "Count 6," which asks if Obama is a "natural born Citizen" and therefore eligible to serve as President

Count 6 reads:

18. Count 6 Violation Article 2, Section 1, Paragraph 5; No Constitutional question before this Honorable Court surpasses the importance concerning this issue that must be adjudicated. Petitioner has never stated Mr. Obama is not a citizen of the United States. That being said, the Constitutional question exists: is Mr. Obama a “natural born Citizen”, if not; how can he exercise the authority of the office of President? Failure to address this Count would constitute a desertion from ones [sic] sworn fiduciary duty and betrayal of the United States Constitution. (See Article 6, Paragraph 2). The Court must consider during the years Mr. Obama was developing a power base and running for President Congress 8-times attempted to remove the Constitution’s requirement that a president be a “natural-born citizen,” suggesting an organized strategy…

19. Therefore, the question still exists whether Mr. Obama was eligible to sign “Act” in law, make appointments, institute regulations or hold the office of president?

Of this new development, Purpura told The Post & Email:

This is really important, because they’re disenfranchising the voters if they don’t hear it. The first three pages, which are the opening statement, will tell you everything, and so will the last page. The only count that really counts here is Count 6. As you know, there are ballot challenges throughout the country, and what I told them flat-out is, “You have no choice but to hear this because we have a constitutional crisis.” I’m believing, that if you read Count 6, because that’s the most important one in the whole brief, they’re sort-of trapped if they’re honest. Kagan and Sotomayor cannot by U.S. statute participate. So we’re in great shape in reality. But will they obey the statutes, or will they do what this administration is doing: ignoring the law that are on the books in the United States.

Purpura then read from the third page of the brief:

It is incumbent upon this Court to settle the issue of ‘eligibility’ post haste to afford those in the Democrat Party an opportunity to choose an “eligible” candidate to be on the ballot in November. To do otherwise disenfranchises all voters and continues the constitutional crisis that has been escalating since the Courts refused to address Hillary Clinton’s 2008 Presidential campaign’s challenge. To ignore this constitutional challenge will have devastating consequence which this Court bears full responsibility for failing to perform its fiduciary duty pursuant to your sworn oath taken by every Member of this Court.
Truth, Obliterated: The “Obama Conspiracy Theory” Psychological Assault Weapon
by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright © 2012 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.
This work is protected by United States Copyright Law. PLEASE REFER TO THE REPRINT/QUOTATION POLICY LINK ABOVE

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

If you appreciate the information presented at Terrible Truth, please assist me in my work by contributing $25.00 [or whatever you can afford].

America, if you've felt assaulted every time you seek the Truth about the personal history of "Barack Obama II", you haven't been over-reacting.

You have been assaulted.

Assaulted by the greatest Psychological Assault Weapon ever levied against Americans.

It's name?

The "Obama Conspiracy Theory" Psychological Assault Weapon.

Its purpose?

To personally demolish you - thereby dis-engaging you from discourse about Obama's personal history - so that whatever "Obama" Truth you're on to, gets obliterated!

The "Obama Conspiracy Theory" Psychological Assault Weapon [OCTPAW] was designed by The Obama Campaign to utterly destroy those who question the "Official Obama Narrative". Since its initial deployment in 2007, this weapon of words has been extremely effective - with ridicule, mocking, shaming, scolding, lying, accusation, word-twisting, confusion creation, threatening and intimidation embedded in its warhead.

It's precision-designed to knock us, full force, back on our heels.

Without our quite knowing what hit us. What was that massive assault on our thoughts, our beliefs, our principles, our feelings? On our very Integrity? Why oh why are we feeling so awful, just for seeking Truth? Do we really want to put ourselves 'out there' again, only to get painfully struck down once more?

Oh, what a weapon!

Like its co-inventors - "Uncle Fred" Newman and The Prince Of Lies - the "Obama Conspiracy Theory" Psychological Assault Weapon is sneaky. It's invisible. In perfect keeping with everything about the "Barack Obama II" synthetic identity, it's thoroughly deceptive.

Designed to facilitate evil, it stinks of righteousness. Crafted to effect subversion of Truth, it claims moral integrity. Dedicated to effect our destruction, it purports to love America and its founding principles.

Why, there's even a website, ready and ever-vigilant, that immediately shoots down on the web any talk of Truth about "Obama". Via posts by "Dr. Conspiracy", and a vigorous, nasty horde of attacker commenter 'identities', Obama Conspiracy Theories thrashes and trashes any person who seeks or states Truth about Obama's personal history.

Notwithstanding the skilled guidance of "Dr. Conspiracy", OCTPAW was The 2008 Obama Campaign's most highly prized weapon.

It's how they managed to defraud America.

It's how they attacked and destroyed all who reasonably questioned the personal history of "Barack Obama II", as presented by him, and his Campaign.

It's how they managed to get him elected, get him 'certified', get him sworn in, keep him in office, and to [thus far] keep him propped up, to secure his re-election.

In one brief sentence, here's how OCTPAW works:

You ask for Truth about the personal history of "Obama",

and immediately,

from multiple sources, simultaneously,

you're assaulted with humiliating accusations

and threats.

In a flash, multiple vicious invisible voices swarm about you, sniping, smacking, tearing at you, accusing you of racism, foolishness, and mental instability, while twisting and distorting your thoughts and words to make them seem preposterous.

You're caught in a vortex of ruthless attack, that spins you round and round, as you try to respond. Spins you so fast, so furiously, you're dizzy.

And totally spent.

Typical cognitive attacks include:

"Oh, so fifty years ago, two people got together to create a child, a name, and documentation, just so that he could destroy America?"

"Do you really believe that a hospital, health department, and newspapers all conspired decades ago to defraud America?"

"Are you accusing The Sitting President's dead parents of criminal fraud?!! Are you accusing him?!!"

That is - there's something REALLY WRONG with your thinking ability, to think there's something wrong with the Official Obama Narrative. A defect which will surely land you in court.

Emotional attacks assail you with charges of mental instability, fringe thinking, weirdo posturing, paranoia, shameful behavior, hate crimes, and more.

Spiritual attacks search out and destroy your sense of decency, morality, and fairness.

Professional attacks tear at your status as a valued professional person.

In every attack, with laugh-out-loud ridiculing intensity, you're insulted and degraded, kicked at, spit upon, and trounced - by a gang of attackers.

What's nastier, all attacks impart the vicious proclamation that by questioning the 'Officlal Narrative' of "Barack Obama II" you are racist.

And stupid, pathetic, ignorant, fringe, hateful, disgusting, laughable, a sicko, a loner, a loser, a flunkie, and an embarrassment to America.

It's not just ridicule that the attackers rely on.

The psychodynamics of aggressive, concerted, group attack play an important role. When OCTPAW strikes, every syllable you utter in reply is swooped down upon, caught up, and carried off in multiple attackers' evil claws; and mockingly bandied about in cyberspace. Setting off bouts of resounding, mocking laughter by voices you 'hear' in comments posted, from faces you cannot see. You don't know where the next attack will come from. You don't know what it will be. You do know this: it is you, versus many. An orchestrated, ruthless, evil-minded many with an evident thrill-of-the-kill mindset.

Aaah, what a perfect weapon OCTPAW was!

But now that The Laser Light Of Truth has shone upon it, their perfect weapon no longer can work like it used to.

And here's the ironic reality, behind the reality:

The Truth lies not far from the assaults!

The "Obama Conspiracy" is no theory.

A dastardly deed of conspiracy was effected.

Though not in the way they present it.

And not by the players hurled at us in their vicious psychological attacks.

The "Obama Conspiracy" was the brainchild of one person.

A person oh-so-close to the man who presents as "Barack Obama II".

Not Jo Ann Newman, the actual identity of "Barack Obama II's" mother.

Nor "Obama's" father, Malcolm X.


The "Obama Conspiracy" was brewed in the brain of "Uncle Fred" Newman.

Who, since the early 1960's, all these decades, worked madly to actualize his cherished vision of America: AMERICA, DEMOLISHED.

Destroyed from the inside out - just as Fred did, over and over, in his radical political activism.

Fred's winning m.o.? Infiltrate, take over, destroy.

Fred Newman not only had motive, he had great opportunity to create the "Obama Conspiracy". As a radical psychologist-therapist, radical playwright, and radical political activist working for the socialist overthrow of America, for decades Fred was 'on the ground', testing and de-bugging what would become the greatest scam in human political history - the creation, marketing, and Presidential Election of A Synthetic Identity!

A Synthetic Identity programmed to enact Fred's Socialist Revolutionary Vision.

At its inception, The "Obama Conspiracy" was principally a conspiracy of synthetic identities, contrived digital images, biographical lies, forged documents, altered records, and false family history, actualized by the man who presents as "Barack Hussein Obama II".

That is:

The original principal conspirators with"Uncle Fred"Newman and Bâri' M. Shabazz [a.k.a. "Barack Obama II"] are objects!

Objects that conspired to establish and support the synthetic identity "Barack Obama II".

Objects Fred Newman could 'trust'.

Now, Master Schemer "Uncle Fred" knew darn well, that his "Barack Obama II" synthetic identity wasn't foolproof.

He knew there was no actual birth record. No actual marriage document for the parents of "Barack Obama II". No actual divorce decree.

He knew that actual school records, actual family photos, an actual ssn application, actual passports, and other typical documentation could not be produced.

He knew that his "Barack Obama II" digital smoke and mirrors would carry him only so far. And that "RACIST" shout-outs would not do the trick forever.

If Fred Newman's Master Scheme were to endure scrutiny, he had to create an automatic, Reaganesque 'Star Wars' defense to infallibly shoot down anyone who spoke up.

And so, America, to protect and preserve Fred's "Barack Obama II" synthetic identity, the "Obama Conspiracy Theory" Psychological Assault Weapon was born!

History will attest: inventing and deploying OCTPAW was nothing short of Genius.

Evil Genius.

Evil Genius à la Fred Newman, Ph.D. - a.k.a. "Obama's" "Uncle Fred".

Now that you know what OCTPAW is, if you can stand it, here's a look inside.

A Prince Of Lies masterpiece, the "Obama Conspiracy Theory" Psychological Assault Weapon is multipronged; and psychologically lethal upon impact.

It's a weapon so dizzying, so masterful, so painfully and throughly destructive - and so impalpable - that when hit by it, we are drawn into a whirlwind vortex of confusion, pain and distress, then blown to bits.

A weapon so precision-crafted, it slays any and all advances toward Truth.

Multi-pronged with emotional, cognitive and spiritual barbs, it targets our deepest sense of positive self-regard, obliterating us - and thereby, our quest for Truth - upon impact.

Eight noxious, painful, humiliating psychological attack-modes simultaneously activate upon impact:

1. Ridiculing your intellect, your personality, your motive, your character, and your professional standing

2. Shaming you as a person and as a citizen; declaration of you as a weirdo; pronouncement of you as intrinsically BAD; identification of the innmerable 'people' who are LAUGHING AT YOU and the many more who WILL laugh at you, if you continue on in your questioning

3. Confusing you with megadose injections of crazy-making doubt - causing you to question both the validity of your information and the validity of your thinking

4. Distracting you, via cognitive-emotional overwhelm - from the topic at hand: TRUTH ABOUT "OBAMA". This attack element is critical to the success of the weapon. The assault is so powerful, so overwhelming, so concerted because it is orchestrated to destroy all of your faculties and senses simultaneously; coercing you, the target, to immediately shift into survival mode; hence you are drawn away from the subject - Truth about "Obama" - to instinctively focus upon stopping your deep, painful psychological wounding

5. Isolating you by declaring that you are ALONE in your position - except for the very few other 'lunatics' who agree with you. The isolating strategy imparts a warning: if you don't cease and desist in your questioning, everyone will think you're hopelessly cracked, a weirdo, crazy, fringe, a wacko, a nut-case, a right-wing extremist, a domestic terrorist, and oh, worst of all, an incurable 'birther' - one who repeatedly has been presented with the truth but stubbornly, without logic, refuses to accept it

6. Scolding you for having questions about the highest elected official in the land. [What are you, a moron - how could he have made it to the top if he were a fraud?!] How dare you question him?! How could you, the nobody that you are, question The Sitting President Of The United States?!!! Such blatant disrespect!!

7. Intimidating you with their FAR SUPERIOR intellectual power, moral position, and political power. And of course, legal and judicial power. You'd better quit right now, while you can. While we're nice enough to let you go, scot-free.

8. [When All Else Fails] THREATENING you with legal action.

America, if we intend to render ineffective their outrageous Attacks Against Truth, there's something fundamental we need to understand.

The "Obama Conspiracy Theory" Psychological Assault Weapon can't be deployed just anywhere.

It only functions in 'virtual' space. That is, on the internet.

It relies on the cyberworld's structure to do its dastardly deed.

With Fred-Newman-Style infiltration of public forums like blogs, chat rooms, discussion groups and newspaper comment areas.

With multiple phony 'identities' possible per attacker - to give the illusion of multiple attackers. And, to afford one attacker the opportunity to converse with himself, as if several people are chiming in, agreeing.

Visit most websites, and talk Truth about "Obama", and a swarm of attackers swoop down upon you. In rapid succession, a different 'person' swarms at you from a different direction, utilizing a different technique, to attack, destroy, and devour you.

In just a few minutes, there's nothing left of you - not even your feathers.

If you recover, and once again brave the multi-pronged, multi-'identity' attacks, back they come at you.

To ensure that you don't return, on and on they attack you, long after you depart, to warn you what will become of you should you dare return.

One particularly effective OCTPAW technique: the evil 'identities' converse with each other, raucously, endlessly mocking you!

Keep in mind that it is highly likely that only one person exists behind multiple attacker 'identities'.

As was Fred's hallmark, stealth is key. Keep in mind that OCTPAW can ONLY WORK when attackers remain invisible. The anonymity afforded to internet attackers provides them protective cover - from identification, and from prosecution.

If you're in doubt as to whether you've been hit by OCTPAW, check around at other websites. Compare the m.o. Compare the tone. Compare the language. The marks of this beast are clear. Detect them, and it is unlikely that an 'ordinary citizen' is the force you are up against.

Take heart, America! All this is soon to be swept in the toxic ash heap of "Obama" History.

The "Obama Conspiracy Theory" Psychological Assault Weapon will not hold us at bay for long!

We now know how it operates.

And we know their strategic secret:

The Obama Campaign War On Truth is successfully waged on one battleground only - the internet.

The 'flash mob' attacks of virtual voices do not emanate from the American People - though this is what they want us to believe.

The onslaught springs from a small number of "Obama" political operatives, working digitally - and invisibly, under fake identities - to continually psychologically assault Truth-seeking Americans.

Just as digital images - fake photos and fake documents - have been the means by which The Obama Campaign succeeded in defrauding the America Electorate, Digital Attacks have been the springboard of their continued Assault On Truth.

America, if you want to turn the evildoers on their heads, here's Step One.

Withdraw your quest for exposing "Obama" from the internet.

Instead, invest your energies in talking with others, in person. At dinner parties. Barbecues. Church gatherings. Go door-to-door, if it suits you.

Share your legitimate concerns the old-fashioned way - by in-person, rational, honest discussion with fellow Americans. Point to the evidence. And to "Obama's" lack thereof.

The first thing you'll notice is how quiet the discussion is.

The next thing you'll notice: these days, in the real world, there's not much resistance. Americans are finally getting that we've been 'had'.

And, in an unexpected way, so is the man who presents himself as "Barack Hussein Obama II".

Bâri' M. Shabazz must see that his narcissist "Uncle Fred" never gave a hoot about what would happen to him, once his cover was blown.

In his monstrous arrogance, and gargantuan callousness, Fred surely assured him that this day would never come.

Boy, was Fred mistaken.

And boy, was he gravely mistaken about something else.

With the activation of weapons, there's fallout.

They who activate weapons can get destroyed in the process.

For all the damage it's done to America, OCTPAW has materially damaged "Obama".

In four years of strikes against determined Truth-Seekers, the assaults have boomeranged their Database Of Deceit, dismantling - and laying bare - their "Obama Narrative" lies.

Exposed forever are the phony "Obama Family" digital images. The altered digital records. The multiple inconsistencies in what they presented as "Obama's" family history. Their heap of synthetic identity invention now lies limp and pathetic, the remains of someone despised.

Blessedly, through the rubble, the underpinning Truth has emerged.

- There is no authentic paper record of a "Barack Hussein Obama II" birth certificate. In Hawaii. Or in any other state.

- There is no authentic record - paper or otherwise - of a name change by Bâri' M. Shabazz - or any interim identity - to "Barack Hussein Obama II".

- There was no "Stanley Ann Dunham".

- There was no "Barack Hussein Obama II" born to "Stanley Ann" and Barack Sr.

America, it's not "Obama's" track record on the economy, or the prospect of an appealing Republican contender, that signals real trouble for The Obama 2012 Campaign.

That spells gloomy doom for the man who presents as "Barack Obama II".

The media, pundits, and campaign workers all have missed what's missing, this time around.


Fred is dead. Gone.

"Uncle Fred" Newman. The schemer, the dreamer, the diabolical mastermind.

The guy who for decades, all through the scam, 'had "Barack's" back'.

The guy who could always invent more evil, to defend and protect what he'd already put in place.

"Barack Obama II" knows: the scam has shattered. And Fred's not here to patch things back together.

These days, "Barack" is not just alone. He's not just lost.

These days, he's [appropriately] scared.

The Truth, Exposed For All To See, is far too terrible.

If you don't believe me, take a good long look at him. Thumb through the photos posted daily, online. Study his troubled face. His worried eyes. His chronically-grimaced mouth.

See what the photojournalists see.

Watch the reactions by Heads Of State. Watch The Secret Service - who seem to be watching him, far more than they watch the crowd.

Watch Michelle, when she thinks the camera's not watching.

I conclude with two questions.

If today at John Wayne Airport, Marine One touched down, and actor John Wayne were there, waiting, what would be his reaction to The Alias President, audaciously enroute to a re-election fundraiser?

Picture "Obama", eyeball to eyeball with The Duke.

Who would you place your bet on? The Duke? Or The Fraud?

Thursday, February 16, 2012

New Coming Holocaust – Christians and Conservatives


by Dr. Laurie Roth, ©2012, Presidential Candidate

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Dr. Laurie Roth is a an independent candidate for President

(Feb. 16, 2012) — The Coliseum is turning on the lights. Attendants have their popcorn and sodas ready. The stands are packed with distracted and thrilled onlookers awaiting ‘the battle of Gods.’ The watchers know this will be a bloodbath and a gooey entertainment fest like never before. Who are the players who will delight the crowd? First we have ‘Christians and Jews’ and those dangerous ‘Constitutionalists’ on one side. Look, they are behaving just like King Obama said - holding their Bibles and being ‘bitter clingers.’ On the other side are the leaders of Islam, Sharia law and global elitism. These are headed by their savior, King Obama.

In special, heated box seats I see the UN and Muslim leadership from the 57 Muslim countries. In another box next door, painted in streaks of bright colors, are all the unemployed movie stars and wanna-be terrorists such as William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, who obsessively stand with Palestine and anyone attacking Israel. Next to them by the pop machine are the traitorous sellout media and leftist political leaders who routinely sell out America and march her toward the new Holocaust – the control and eradication of Christians who support the Constitution and Jews who just won’t go away.

The stage has been set for our demise. 72 FEMA camps have been activated. The NDAA Bill has been voted into law, launched by Marxist posers – John McCain and Carl Levin. We all know this by now, but this gives Obama the power to seize any American using our military at any time. He can grab us without charges, without a trial and hold us indefinitely on anything he can dream up.

None of this is new. The pattern established by Hitler is simply being copied by Obama and his thugs. Remember, Obama is the teleprompter King. He copies his heroes, Saul Alinsky, Hitler and other dictators. He also obeys what his handlers tell him, global elitists and Islamic leaders.

Adolph Hitler wrenched democracy and freedom from Germany’s hands with ‘Hitler’s Enabling Act,’ voted legally into law on March 23, 1933. It was also called ‘Law for Removing the Distress of the People and the Reich.’ You may recall that Hitler had the Nazis burn down the Reichstag German Government building so they could create enough panic to get the votes for Hitler’s Enabling Act. He blamed the Communists for the deed and people believed him. That was the end of democracy and freedom in Germany.

In a similar fashion we have seen the NDAA law slaughter our Constitution and rights. It has given the putative president total power over the people and the legal ability to use military force to assault and detain us for a trumped-up reason. Responding to the signing of the NDAA Bill, Obama stated he would never abuse the power. GOP frontrunner Mitt Romney, also a supporter of this bill, said he would never abuse the power due to his character.

Listen to the words of another famous person, Adolph Hitler. Right before the vote for his Enabling Act, Hitler made a speech to the Reichstag where he pledged restraint and use of power. “The government will make use of these powers only insofar as they are essential for carrying out vitally necessary measures….The number of cases in which an internal necessity exists for having recourse to such a law is in itself a limited one.” These were the actual words of Hitler to the Reichstag.

Hitler promised a ton of lies before the vote. He promised an end to unemployment and said he would promote peace with France, Great Britain and the Soviet Union. Hitler and the Nazis were part of the ‘Green’ environmental agenda and supportive of national health care as Obama is.

We have a usurper as President whose world view is one also of transforming America into a Marxist/Communist regime. From the beginning the signs were everywhere that we had a tyrant for a President. Don’t forget that Obama and Michelle were supportive of and at flag burning events and stated publicly before Obama was elected how they hated America. In fact Michelle said she only started to love America after Obama was elected. Obama constantly has surrounded himself with Communists, anti-American and anti-Jewish colleagues and employees. His actions from day one have been against Jews, Christians, conservatives, our Constitution and against God Himself.

Obama will not willfully give up his power. He has more to finish here and abroad. I predict, as the months unfold toward Election Day 2012 that Internet, conservative journals and speech will be greatly diminished. This will be a financial attack, regulation attack and set of contrived legal attacks. Talk radio and conservative commentators will also be attacked and silenced.

Watch for contrived and invented threats to attack parts of America, while the Russians are blamed……oh, yeah, that was Hitler. I mean, while the American Christians and conservatives are blamed. George Soros has predicted riots in the streets in America. The Occupy Wall street groups did plenty of damage but it wasn’t quite the ace of destruction Obama needed to start falsely identifying dangerous people and groups. Watch out for bold attacks aimed at national Tea Party groups and leaders; Watch out for Pastors to be arrested for preaching from The Holy Bible and not editing their speech; eventually, as in the days of ancient Rome, Christians will be considered the enemy of the Government since we won’t submit to falsely turning people in, abandoning freedom of religion and speech. These assaults and threats are already happening and unfolding.

We are seeing Obama war with the Catholic Church and Christian faith. His healthcare mandate intends to force churches and religious organizations to provide abortion drugs and supportive products. They and insurance plans will also have to provide surgical sterilization. There is no place in our Constitution where insurance companies and religious groups can be forced to pay for abortion services and products. Yet, this de facto president, who hates the Constitution, just continues to ignore it as he takes bold leaps forward into his beloved new and improved Fascist America. We have a President who is demanding the nation pay for abortions regardless of our beliefs. If we let him, he will start forcing assisted suicide to all who are disabled, medically too expensive or just too old to contribute anymore. Remember, this was already done in one of the most civilized countries on earth, Germany. We are watching it unfold right before our eyes in America. History MUST NOT repeat itself.

Those of you who love our Constitution, freedoms, Judeo-Christian values and heritage, understand that you are on a growing enemy list. ‘Bitter clingers’ that you are… more guns, Bibles and ammo now. Don’t ever agree to give your guns or neighbors up. Pray hard for your country and get behind Patriot Conservatives everywhere. Boot the sold-out establishment out, whether Democrat or Republican. Don’t ever submit to forced health care and controls of the IRS anywhere near your health, life and accounts. Don’t ever submit to authorities arresting you in the middle of the night. Demand the repeal of NDAA and everything else Obama has touched and voted into law.

Join me on my show each day Let your thoughts be heard, chat and blog at
Top 12 for 2012: Questions for Barry Soetoro


by Gary Stevens

Is there a candidate who will ask Obama these 12 simple questions?

(Feb. 16, 2012) — Election time is upon us once again. For clarity of the issues facing the candidates or challenging candidates to even appear on ballots for 2012, a simple engagement (preferably on camera) of inquiry provided in the list below should reveal the most pressing Constitutional issue facing America. For every candidate these types of questions have been routine and required to be sufficiently, accurately, and honestly confirmed to receive their Party nomination, that is, until the 2008 election, when none of the questions were answered and independently confirmed for Barack Hussein Obama.

Perhaps the 2012 election will be different. The more discerning voter has reasonable doubt that the last election was legitimate because of a questionably ineligible candidate on the ballot. This suspicion can be alleviated by obtaining the answers to twelve questions which Barry Soetero, aka Barack Obama, has never PERSONALLY answered.

1. Where and when did you formally (legally) change your name from Barry Soetero to Barack H. Obama?
2. What hospital in Hawaii will/can confirm your birth record?
3. With which student status (resident, foreign, etc.) did you apply for student loans at Occidental, Columbia and Harvard?
4. Have you ever traveled to Russia?
5. Having run as the most transparent candidate, why do you block all access to past records?
6.Since your release on April 27, 2011 of your Hawaii birth record, can we the American people see the microfiche of the original since you have nothing to hide?
7. How do you respond to the computer, Adobe®, and graphics experts who have declared your “long-form birth certificate” a forgery?
8. How did you secure a Connecticut Social Security number while living in Hawaii?
9. In transparency that you consistently affirm, would you commit to an independent DNA test confirming your claimed biological ancestry?
10. Can you explain the motivation for signing Executive Order #13489 sealing all records of your identity, passports, school attendance, college records, Selective Service registration, etc.?
11. How did Bill Ayers (he only lived in the neighborhood) have authorization to pick up your kids from school?
12. As a sponsor (with Hillary Clinton) of Senate Resolution 511 confirming McCain as eligible for the office of POTUS during the 2008 election, how do you qualify as Article II, Section 1 Constitutional “natural born Citizen” with a non-citizen father?

Those running and debating for President of the United States only need to ask Barry Soetero the above short list of pertinent questions to establish legitimate law-abiding grounds on which to proceed further into the campaign. Unless the above questions are accurately and provably dealt with, there is NO election by law. There was no legal election in 2008, since the issues are unresolved and continually pending within the corruption of Congress, Department of Justice, Homeland Security (think of it, a usurper has authority over these agencies), CIA, FBI, State Department, NSA, etc.

May integrity rule where it has declined. May the new candidates be filled with humble boldness to ask penetrating, truth-seeking, and law-abiding questions, and in so doing, secure a leadership that is from the people, for the people and by the people.

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Obama Media Begin the Faking of Obama Poll Numbers


by Sher Zieve, ©2012

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Has Obama been installed as a dictator with the cooperation of Republicans and Democrats in Congress?

(Feb. 15, 2012) — In order to sway the vast majority and growing number of Americans who have finally faced up to the fact that Obama is purposefully trying to destroy the United States of America, the Obama Media have begun their side of the Obama syndicate’s overall strategy of lying to us. Polls now show 50% of voters would vote for Obama. Intelligent people–even those few on the Left– know this is a lie. But, it’s what all third-world countries have done since their inception.

This is what we said would happen, at least a year ago. This is what is happening now. The polls are being used to convince the more uninformed amongst us that there is no real hope of regaining our country and we’d better get used to submitting to the dictator already in office. Obama does not intend to leave–under any circumstances–so we may as well accept our enslavement as the good sheeple Obama plans to herd off the cliff. Obama has told us via his actions over and over again that he will decimate our country and we can do nothing about it.

Note: As there are now myriad Marxist-plants in the Republicans Party (we who have actually followed their shenanigans for years know who they are) the Marxist-Dems have pretty much all of the support they need to pass one unconstitutional bill after another. And–if by some miracle these bills do not pass–they still have Obama who will unconstitutionally and therefore illegally issue an Executive Order for anything he wants. As I’ve mentioned before, we’re already living under a dictatorship.

Today, it was announced that Obama plans to reduce our nuclear weapons to virtually nothing (an 80% reduction) and less than either China or Russia possesses. The dictator-in-chief is bent upon making the USA a target for both nukes and takeover by hostile forces as soon as possible. Our own corrupt Congress and US military leaders are currently silent…with only crickets being heard in the distance. In this, silence=concurrence.

Earlier this year, with his canceling of the (already contracted) Keystone pipeline deal with Canada and virtually forcing Canada to sell their oil to China, and his shutting down one coal mine after another, Obama has (in no uncertain terms) essentially told We-the-People “No more energy for you! It’s time for your country to die and make way for my real purpose and ascendancy. You have already learned that I can do anything I want to you and your country and no one will stop me. I AM Obama!”

We know about all too many of the other horrors Obama has already leveled upon us including (but, not limited to) ObamaCare, open borders (in order to destroy our border States), placing our enemy, the Muslim Brotherhood, in very high level security positions within the US government, allowing Iran to become nuclear-weaponized (while he guts the USA of its nukes), removing virtually all of the money in the US Treasury for his own reasons and setting up one after another “green” companies as shells for his own personal and Democrats’ slush funds and money laundering operations. Each day Obama remains in office he takes more away from us then gives it to himself and his friends. Congress and the leftist courts are smiling with him as they, too, work to instill and install as many perversities as possible and help him shred what was left of the US Constitution.

We have already been informed that if Obama seizes another term in office, he will remove the entire Bill of Rights–with the Second Amendment as his first target. Note: He has already done away with the First Amendment’s freedom of religion clause. Telling the Catholic Church (which would include other Churches and Synagogues) that they must comply with the provision of contraceptives, abortions and sterilizations is in direct conflict with the First Amendment. It is also illegal (which hasn’t stopped Obama from doing anything thus far), as the POTUS has no authority to make any decisions regarding the First Amendment–whatsoever–or any other Amendments in our Bill of Rights. It is forbidden by our now-almost-defunct Constitution. But, our elected officials seem to either stand in agreement with him or are cowering in silence at these escalating outrages. I’m sure that–after its decades of following the Marxist-Democrat line of “social justice”–the Catholic Church was shocked by Obama. They really didn’t think the Obama crocodile would try to eat them. But, it did…and may still do so.

As I have said many…many times (even talk show hosts now openly agree with me and are repeating what I’ve written) ‘if no one stops Obama, it’s as if the law no longer exists’. Sorry this cannot be more positive, folks. But, we are allowing Obama to steal everything we have, destroy our God-given rights and become our slave master. This is profoundly serious. He truly must be stopped.

As the 2012 General Election looms closer the bogus poll numbers will increase. BTW, the economy is not doing better. It‘s actually doing worse. Those numbers are also being manipulated by the Obama machine. In order to even begin to report numbers that would help Obama, the ObamaGov and the major media had to drop all essentially important data. The actual facts, as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and reiterated by Tyler Durden, are: “…the people not in the labor force exploded by an unprecedented record 1.2 million. No, that’s not a typo: 1.2 million people dropped out of the labor force in one month! So as the labor force increased from 153.9 million to 154.4 million, the non-institutional population increased by 242.3 million meaning, those not in the labor force surged from 86.7 million to 87.9 million. Which means that the civilian labor force tumbled to a fresh 30 year low of 63.7% as the BLS is seriously planning on eliminating nearly half of the available labor pool from the unemployment calculation.” The Obama government is continuing to fake employment numbers, as well as removing other detrimental to his ruling syndicate.

The major media belongs to the Obama syndicate. I suspect they actually believe the crocodile won’t eat them either. Apparently, they have short memories as to what happened to the press under the Perons, Stalin, Hitler and, most recently, Hugo Chavez. But, if we let it, we already know the crocodile is going eat us.