Before It's News | People Powered News

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Obama’s Relatives Commit Crimes Against America…Now What About Him?
by Sharon Rondeau

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.

Are there more illegal alien family members of this man in the U.S. Is he himself here legally?(Aug. 31, 2011) — In recent days, not even the mainstream media has obscured the fact that Barack Hussein Obama has an uncle who was arrested for drunk driving and had been living in the United States illegally for 19 years. “Uncle Onyango” has been “held without bail” by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency.In 2009, Onyango’s nephew in the White House had reportedly instructed ICE to “put on hold” deportations of illegals employed by U.S. companies. An article dated August 31, 2011 states that “Obama’s illegal alien uncle, now locked up on an immigration detainer, could be a beneficiary of his nephew’s new go-easy policy on foreigners facing deportation.”The organization FAIR has questioned Janet Napolitano on the “sweeping changes” advocated by her department after Congress failed to pass the DREAM Act earlier this year.The website for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement claims that “U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has a vital responsibility to enforce the law and engage in effective worksite enforcement to reduce the demand for illegal employment and protect employment opportunities for the nation’s lawful workforce. ICE employs an effective, comprehensive worksite enforcement strategy that addresses both employers who knowingly hire illegal workers as well as the workers themselves.”The Immigration Policy Center states that the Obama Department of Homeland Security had simultaneously attempted to enforce deportations in accordance with federal law and advocate for “comprehensive immigration reform” at the same time with “mixed results.”Barack Hussein Obama’s half-aunt had been an illegal alien living in government-subsidized housing in Boston, MA and was later allowed to remain in the country despite her violation of a deportation order in 2004. Zeituni Onyango had also been collecting public assistance. How can an illegal alien receive public assistance in the United States? Did she have a social security number when she applied for benefits?Who paid for the attorneys who won her grant of asylum? Does Aunt Zeituni have to return the money she received as an illegal alien to the taxpayers?Uncle Onyango had also previously been ordered deported but, like Zeituni, failed to obey the order to return to Kenya.How can illegal aliens possess “valid social security numbers?” Were the numbers they are using assigned to them, or are they valid for someone else? Were the numbers stolen? Did Zeituni and Onyango commit identity fraud? Why did they not return to their “home country” of Kenya?Does Barack Hussein Obama have any other illegal alien relatives residing in the United States? Is he an illegal alien himself?What about Obama’s half-brother, who has been accused of “mishandling donations” made to a fund in their common father’s name? The father who also was ordered deported from the country in 1964 due to his polygamy, a fact which did not emerge until earlier this year.If Obama himself was born in Kenya, as affirmed by the Kenyan ambassador to the U.S. as an “already well-known” fact and was born to a foreign father, why is he occupying the Oval Office as a “natural born Citizen?”On August 30, 2011, Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. District Court in Washington, DC dismissed a case alleging that Barack Hussein Obama isJudge Royce Lamberth issued an opinion dismissing the case "Taitz v. Astrue" stating that Obama's social security number should not be revealed due to "privacy" concerns, even though the number has already been made publicusing a stolen social security number which included the statement of a licensed private investigator asserting such. The first page of Lamberth’s opinion reads, in part:“Ever persistent, plaintiff has once again come before this Court in an effort to uncover “the biggest cover up in the history of this nation…She believes that the President is using a “fraudulently obtained” social security number and that the Social Security Administration — among other agencies — is involved in a scheme to “cover[] up social security fraud, IRS fraud, elections fraud and possibly treason” committed by the President…As her numerous filings with the Court demonstrate, plaintiff will stop at nothing to get to the bottom of this alleged conspiracy. Unfortunately for plaintiff, today is not her lucky day.”Where did Lamberth obtain his legal training? Since when is a judge’s opinion based on his perception of the “luck” or lack thereof of one of the parties to the case? Is his sarcasm enough to show that he is not impartial?Where was Lamberth when the defendants’ allotted time to respond had elapsed and the plaintiff had requested a default judgment?His biography states, in part:“Judge Lamberth is also former Chairman of the Professional Ethics Committee of the Federal Bar Association. The Federal Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct for Federal Lawyers, finally approved in October 1990, were drafted by Judge Lamberth’s Committee.”But has Lamberth acted ethically in this instance? The plaintiff, Orly Taitz, did not seek the social security number of a living person, but rather, had requested a copy of the application filed by the original holder of the number which is now reportedly being used by Obama. Private investigator Susan Daniels has stated that the number has been used by Obama since 1977 but was not assigned to him.Was Lamberth’s opinion issued in a professional and ethical manner? Is he following all of the rules of judicial ethics?Are his sarcastic tone and character judgments about the plaintiff normal procedure? Is Lamberth using Saul Alinsky tactics to dismiss a case of identity fraud committed at the highest levels of government?On page 2 of his opinion, Lamberth stated that the Social Security Administration could not release Form SS-5 because the number in question belonged to a living individual. However, Susan Daniels, the licensed private investigator whose sworn affidavit stated that the number had been assigned to a person born in 1890 from the state of Connecticut, had stated that social security numbers are never reissued and therefore Obama was using it fraudulently. Why did Lamberth ignore this evidence of a crime?When evidence of Barack Hussein Obama’s constitutional ineligibility to hold the office of president was presented to him, Judge Royce Lamberth refused to review it. While the Fifth Amendment to the Bill of Rights allows for “a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury” as evidence of a crime, Lamberth relied on the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which declared presentments “obsolete.”Do Federal Rules passed by Congress trump the Fifth Amendment? Were the rules passed to take away the people’s power over government?Have the people lost control over their government? Do they care?If no one charged with law enforcement responsibility in Tennessee will act against a judge who has broken the law there, what are the chances that a federal judge will act against Obama, who has been accused of violating the War Powers Act and is being sued by members of Congress from both parties? Which federal judge will hear the case, and what opinion will he issue?What about Obama’s knowledge of Project Gunrunner? his alias, “Barry Soetoro,” and possible other aliases? Why has the U.S. State Department refused to release information on Obama’s mother’s travel records?And, like his illegal alien relatives, why is Obama using a social security number which could not have been assigned to him? What about the birth certificate which he claims is official but has been termed a forgery by many and the media’s failure to scrutinize it?Is our government completely corrupt in refusing to act on these questions? If the government cannot be trusted to police itself, whose job is it to do so?If no one acts, are we relegated to another Third Reich, or totalitarian state?When the government is the enemy, what should the people do?
How Did Obama Obtain a Social Security Number from Connecticut? A BLOGGER’S PERSPECTIVE by Dwight Kehoe, blogging at TPATH Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email. (Aug. 24, 2011) — Susan Daniels, a private investigator with almost 2 decades of experience has come to a very compelling conclusion – President Obama is using a Social Security number, issued to someone else. This is, as is the forgery of public documents, a crime. The SS number Obama is illegally using will not be posted here, but it can be found easily enough if one wishes to verify these facts. From the age of 15 to 25, there is no record of Obama using any Social Security number. While in school in Hawaii he may well have been able to get by without one. However, once he moved to California and began university schooling in Occidental College, he would need to provide one. Conveniently, all of his college records have been sealed, so there is no way of knowing, at least for now, what SS number he used at that time. It is possible that the number he used may be at the heart of why he needed a new one. Maybe he was issued a foreign student SS number along with monetary aid for schooling. Not knowing the real reason, this of course is just the speculation of this writer, me. At this point only Obama knows why. What is known, is that the SS number Obama is now using, does not show up on any data base as being used by anyone, until 1986 even though Social Security records show it was issued in the last two weeks of March, 1977. The number was issued to a person born in 1890 who apparently applied for it at age 87. In 1935 when the Social Security System began, many people never applied because it was voluntary. This person most likely needed to get one very late in life in order to get some benefit or other. The number never shows up in data bases, so the person must have passed on very shortly after being assigned the number. This would make this number, a perfect candidate for criminal activity relating to false ID’s. Enter Bill Ayers, the communist, revolutionary, terrorist that Obama claimed was just some guy living in his neighborhood, who’s children went to school with his, even though Ayers’ children are a half generation older than Obama’s. Later it was discovered that Bill Ayers, more than likely, wrote much of Obama’s book,’ Dreams From My Father’, as well as holding one of the first Obama fundraisers in his home. Ayers has said, and proudly so, that a lot of what they did as terrorist bombers and murderers, was producing and falsifying identifications for their criminal activities. The most effective method was through the use of fraudulent Social Security numbers. A minimally used SS number issued to an 87 year old would some how seem to be a great candidate for that illegal SS number file. Even though Ayers was just a “guy in the neighborhood,” if Obama needed to dump his legal SS number, for whatever reason, Professor Ayers may have taken a break from indoctrinating our youth and reached into his false ID vault and issued him one. A few final facts about Social Security numbers. 1. No SS number is ever reused, even after the death of the user. 2. SS numbers are issued by state location. One must live in the state where it is issued. 3. Obama’s natural father, adopted father, mother or grand parents never lived in Connecticut. 4. When the SS number Obama is using was issued by Connecticut, Obama was 15 and living in Hawaii. The question here is obvious. Is there no one one in Congress or the media with the backbone to stand up and ask, – What the heck is going on in my country? Of course, there may well be a very honest and reasonable explanation for this, the forged birth certificate and the very suspicious Selective Service documents. Someone has “a lot of splainin’ to do.” Will our Congress and media ever step up to the plate and demand it? It’s looking very doubtful.
To America….The Country We Love OBAMA’S GREATEST FEAR…THE TRUTH Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email. by Robert Quinn To date, no analyst has vouched for the authenticity of this image purported to be a certified copy of Obama's birth certificate on file with the Hawaii Department of Health (Aug. 25, 2011) — On September 14, 2011, inside a Hawaiian Federal Courthouse, Barack Obama’s transparency will be severely tested due to an historic event which took place on August 8. On that date, Dr. Orly Taitz, a steadfast attorney challenging Obama’s Presidential eligibility, previously had a court-ordered subpoena issued and served upon the Hawaiian Health Department director, Loretta Fuddy, ordering the production of their copy of Obama’s original “Certificate of Live Birth,” along with other pertinent documents for examination by competent authorities as to their authenticity. The Health Department ignored the subpoena. On August 8, Dr. Taitz met with Health Department officials, who refused to release any documents for viewing or analysis, citing “privacy” concerns. Dr. Taitz was now forced to seek the assistance of a Federal Court which has now ordered the Health Department and specifically, Ms. Fuddy, to appear in Court on September 14 to justify her ignoring of the subpoena. This is an issue of monumental significance, yet the major media outlets never mentioned it to their viewers and readers. Even Fox News is guilty in this regard. Their Bill O’Reilly originally claimed he saw the original Hawaiian Birth Certificate, but, when challenged, changed his story to “my staff actually saw it” when, in fact, the only document Obama had ever shown the public at that time was a “Certification of Live Birth (COLB). Also, for Mr. O’Reilly to sarcastically say that “birthers imply Obama’s family anticipated that Baby Obama would someday seek the Presidency and therefore sought an American identity for him” insulted the intelligence of all of his viewers. In reality, the benefits of obtaining an American “naturalized” citizen status were many, including the right to seek to drive a car but not our Nation. Since Mr. O’Reilly avoids serious commentary or analysis on this issue, I suggest that when ending his weekly TV shows with his “The spin stops here,” he add “except when we continually stonewall or ridicule the Obama eligibility issue.” History in the Making…Or is it “Re-making?” A few years ago, Obama supporters posted on the Internet what is now considered by experts a fraudulent “Certification of Live Birth (COLB), claiming it to be a copy of the Hawaiian Health Department’s original birth certificate. If true, it would make the Health Department copy also a COLB. Since Presidential aspirants are required to be “natural-born” (not “naturalized) citizens, only a “Certificate of Live Birth” allows them to seek the Presidency. I believe that Obama, a Constitutional teacher, knew this and, therefore, could not allow anyone to view the Health Department copy. As to any possibility that it might actually be a “Certificate of Live Birth,” it would mean that Obama lied by saying his copy was identical and, more importantly, he would have obviously authorized an immediate release by the Health Department to satisfy challengers and not have spent over $2,000,000 to conceal it from view. Last January, Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie publicly stated that he would personally go to the Health Department and secure a copy of the true Birth Certificate and put the issue to rest. Two weeks later, the Governor was forced to admit no copy could be found, only a file with notations of some reported births, including that of a Barack Obama; no original birth certificate, not even a “Certification of Live Birth” (COLB). Deception After Deception After Deception To prevent future eligibility problems, some States are seeking laws requiring Presidential aspirants (including Obama) to provide a valid “Certificate of Live Birth” in order to have their names put on State ballots. Obama, up until then, hid behind his “Certification of Live Birth”(COLB) which, as mentioned above, he claimed was an identical copy of the hospital copy, thereby invalidating each other. Amazingly, in April 2011, he then claimed to have received an actual “Certificate of Live Birth” copy from the Hawaii Health Department which he might intend to present to each State to justify his eligibility since millions are now aware of the difference between “natural-born” and “naturalized” and he realizes he cannot use a COLB any longer to fool America again. Unbelievable — a document which no one could find and which Obama fought and paid to conceal miraculously turns up. This newly-found “Certificate” has already been declared a fake by many, and a poor one at that. If a supposed Health Department copy shows the same typewriter altering as Obama’s copy does, fraud becomes evident. In addition, here are more examples of Obama’s deception: Consider-Dr. Chiyome Fukino, former director of the Hawaii Health Department, said that she personally saw Obama’s birth certificate, which the Governor couldn’t find, and that it was half-typed and half-written, yet Obama’s April posting on a Government website is completely typed! Consider-Obama family members claimed two different birth hospitals, later reduced to one, not by either hospital but by Obama. One would think the birth hospital of the first black American President would proudly display some reference to this auspicious event, yet no Hawaiian hospital will claim that honor. Consider-Army Lt. Colonel Terrence Lakin, a decorated surgeon who, after a fruitless year of requesting assurances of Obama’s eligibility from military superiors and writing directly to Obama (with no response), found his patience rewarded first by silence, then by a court-martial, loss of all income, a dishonorable discharge and imprisonment. This was Obama’s “thank you” to one who faithfully served his country for eighteen years, including service in Afghanistan; a recipient of the Bronze Star and numerous other citations. The tragic ending to his faithful military career would have been avoided if his Commander-in-Chief(?) had simply produced a valid birth certificate….if one ever existed. Obama made time to fill out a form with the names of basketball teams he favored in an upcoming tournament and to go off on “working” vacations but took no time to respond to Lt. Col. Lakin, who, after troubling eligibility doubts surfaced, merely sought confirmation that the service and salutes which all Services rendered to their President was being received by one entitled to command their allegiance. Barack Obama, a man who repeatedly boasted of being “transparent”….until eligibility surfaced. Obama is now the only person who now owns the notorious distinction of being the only Commander-in-Chief who ever refused to produce a valid birth certificate. Please reflect on that last sentence and also remember that, to continue his deception, he sacrificed another man’s career and freedom! Consider-When Lt. Col. Lakin was court-martialed, the presiding judge would not allow him to request any records of Obama, lest “they prove embarrassing to the President.” How ironic….if they did so prove, it would have been because they would have shown that Obama was not eligible to become our President. Sadly, embarrassment won over transparency. Deception over TRUTH! Consider-Obama’s “vetting” consisted of his delayed presentation of an invalid “Certification of Live Birth,” while virtually every other document requested he refused to release. Consider-in every lawsuit his attorneys failed to present a “Certificate of Live Birth” to confirm a “natural-born” status. That document alone could have prevented many lawsuits from ever being filed, unless it was limited, fraudulent or non-existent. Consider-Globe Magazine offered $100,000 to the United Negro College Fund if Obama revealed a valid “Certificate of Live Birth.” One year later, his transparency hasn’t yet “kicked in.” He still hasn’t acknowledged their offer. Consider-When questioned as to his eligibility, Obama never answers a question directly. When asked to allow his birth certificate to be examined by reputable experts, his response was “I can’t wear it on my forehead.” No one was interested in his forehead. They wanted to see the certificate. On my e-mail list I have a Rhodes Scholar, hundreds of active and retired Military men and women, from Privates to Generals and Admirals, lawyers involved in the “eligibility” issue, Tea Party members, Senators and Representatives; people of all races and colors. These are some of the people Obama portrays (in his own words) as “carnival barkers, sideshow performers and ‘sillies,” for when he cannot defend his actions he turns to ridicule. Sadly, many elected officials, both Democrat and Republican alike, dismiss this issue casually with remarks such as “We have more important issues to consider.” Thank God (yes, “God”) our Founders did not have more “important issues” to consider than freedom when the first shots rang out. “The Only People Who Don’t Want to Disclose the Truth are Those With Something to Hide” Please reflect on the above words of Barack Obama, as reported in Newsday (L.I. Newspaper) on August 22, 2010. Destroying Lt. Col. Lakin’s career and livelihood shows how low Obama would sink to prevent any disclosure which could derail his presidency. Now let us see if America will stand tall and confront the greatest scam our country ever endured. Addendum: I have done Catholic writing for twenty years. Over two and one-half years ago I started writing of challenges to Obama’s “presumed” Presidential eligibility. He stepped into the Religious arena and said (among other things) that he had no problem with leaving a child, born after a “botched” abortion, to die if its mother so wished. The color of Obama’s skin never disturbed me, but the color of an aborted child’s skin does, whether white, black, brown, or whatever. Therefore, after the election, when more information surfaced which cast further doubt on Obama’s eligibility, the door which I thought had closed on Election Day was found ajar, giving me the opportunity to renew challenging him on the eligibility issue. That is why all my letters pertain solely to the issue of Presidential eligibility. In conclusion, I pray that all who receive this letter raise their voices to their elected officials, whether Democrat, Republican or Independent and also demand that the media start acknowledging the existence of this issue. With transparency will come Truth and Justice.

Sunday, August 14, 2011

The Real Revolution


by Jedi Pauly, ©2011

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.

Are the 50 states in the same situation as the Colonies were in 1776?

(Aug. 11, 2011) — The foregoing is an analysis of the political, legal, and historic situation regarding the current illegitimate United States Government, and the illegitimate unlawful President known as Barack Hussein Obama, which are the results of a fraudulent federal election in 2008. In this analysis, I will endeavor to describe the specific tangible injury to a specific and limited subset or political “class” of U.S. citizens, an injury that grants this particular class standing in the courts, and what I perceive as the only viable legal strategy or avenue available to successfully obtain a legal remedy that will cause the government to become lawful again and which could theoretically remove Obama from Office and restore the rights of the People.
There are Three Political Classes in the United States

The first thing we need to do is to establish an understanding of the different political classes of citizens that exist in the United States. Contrary to popular opinion, not all citizens of the United States have the same rights, nor are even entitled to the same rights. Your membership in a particular political class determines what political rights you have as a citizen of the United States.

There are essentially three political classes in the United States, which can be separated into two groups. Starting with the third class, it consists of those who have the right to be U.S. citizens but have no political rights of representation in the federal Congress nor the political right to be President. They are the citizens of federal territories and possessions who are “naturalized” U.S. citizens according to U.S. laws governing federally-held territories and possessions. The second class consists of those who are U.S. citizens who have the political right of representation in Congress but no political right to be President. They would include recent immigrants to the United States or anyone who is born or naturalized within a State of the United States and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States under the 14th Amendment; in other words, those who are born to a foreign father or foreign parents within a State of the United States. They are also called “naturalized” citizens. The first class consists of those citizens who have both the political right to representation in Congress and the political right to be President. They are the ones born to a U.S citizen father or to U.S. citizen parents who are already State citizens, and therefore are U.S. citizens, at the time of the child’s birth. They are called “natural born Citizens” in the Constitution. They are the naturally-created indigenous citizens of the U.S. who do not belong to the group of “naturalized” citizens to which the first two classes mentioned belong. They are the opposite political class group to those who are in the group of “naturalized” citizens.

The three political classes are described in the Constitution and U.S. law and are given the labels “natural born Citizen,” “Citizen of the United States” with an upper case “C,” and “citizen of the United States” with a lower case “c.” The legal and historic differences which arise out of these three terms, combined with the legal subject of “equal protection,” give rise to a great deal of confusion among those who believe that all citizens have the same rights, or that a “citizen of the United States” always means the same thing as a “Citizen of the United States.” On the contrary, they do not always mean the same thing. Equal protection of the laws applies only to each citizen equally for the members of the same political class. In other words, within your political class, each member is entitled to be treated “equally,” but equal protection does not apply across the different political classes because the members of each of the different political classes have different recognized rights from the other classes. I will now try to clarify this confusion which arises from these three different specific terms referring to citizens.

The basic historic and political legal difference between a “citizen of the United States” and a “Citizen of the United States” has to do with the subject of jurisdiction, Federal or State. Generally speaking, a “citizen of the United States” (lower case “c”), as was used in U.S. Codes and Case Law prior to the 14th Amendment (where this term first appears in the U.S. Constitution), describes a federal citizen “subject” of federal jurisdiction, and a “Citizen of the United States” (upper case “C”) does not. A “Citizen of the United States” is NOT a federal citizen “subject” of federal jurisdiction.
The Political Rights Protected in the Constitution Apply Only to Those Who are Mentioned in the Constitution

The U.S. Constitution is an agreement between the original thirteen sovereign states of the union of states and their creation, the federal government. The use of the capitalization of the word “citizen,” as in “natural born Citizen” or “Citizen of the United States,” is meant to convey in the Constitution the exclusion of federal citizen “subjects” such as citizens from the federal territories or possessions. The capitalization is meant to inform the reader that the citizens being referred to in the Constitution are a specific subset of the citizens at large; in other words, only the state citizens who are U.S. citizens by virtue of their state citizenship.

For example, a “citizen of the United States” would be a federal citizen-subject of a federal territory or possession, or a resident alien, or an immigrant while he is going through the immigration process, or a person who has not yet been declared to be a “Citizen of the United States.” Once the immigrant either completes the naturalization process of immigration or is declared, he or she would automatically graduate to the political status of “Citizen of the United States” and would no longer be a subject of federal jurisdiction; but he could never attain the status of “natural born Citizen.” This explains the Article II wording stating that only “a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption…”, can be President. The “Citizen of the United States” at the time of the adoption of the Constitution is a one-time limited exception that has now expired, intended originally for those who were neither citizens of the federal territories or possessions at the time of the Adoption, nor were natural born citizens of the states at the time of the Adoption. Rather, they were those who were essentially declared to be naturalized immigrants, declared to have completed immigration, or were declared due to their residency within the States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution or due to their military service in the American Revolution.

Likewise, a 14th Amendment “citizen of the United States” is a declared U.S. citizen at birth who is a federal citizen “subject,” who must subject himself over time to the jurisdiction of the federal government according to the language in the 14th Amendment and statutes, and also reside within a State over time; by this they then become naturalized over time and graduate to the status of “Citizen of the United States” who are no longer subject to, or must subject themselves to, federal jurisdiction. Therefore, a “natural born Citizen” is always automatically also a “Citizen of the United States,” but the opposite is not necessarily true. A “Citizen of the United States” may not necessarily be a “natural born Citizen.” Generally speaking, it is usually the case that there is no legal difference between a “citizen of the United States” and a “Citizen of the United States” as long as we are just talking about limited equal protection and legal rights that do not include jurisdictional issues, or natural, or legal, political rights differences. If one includes federal subject status jurisdictional issues and political rights issues (both natural political rights and legal political rights), then there is a huge legal difference between these three descriptions of citizens.
Previous Failures of Standing and Injury

This raises an important legal issue that one must be aware of. If you go into a court of law as a “Citizen of the United States” who by definition is not a citizen “subject” of federal jurisdiction, and you then plead for your rights to be recognized under the 14th Amendment, by that you essentially waive your equal protection rights under the Constitution as a “Citizen of the United States.” This is because you are informing the court that you are a “citizen of the United States,” a federal citizen “subject” of federal jurisdiction who is seeking equal protection under the 14th Amendment like a former slave, and you are not a sovereign state citizen who is not a federal citizen “subject” seeking equal protection of your natural sovereign political status and rights under the Constitution prior to the 14th Amendment. Federal citizen-subjects, or a “citizen of the United States,” have no inherited natural sovereign political rights recognized as protected in the Constitution. Their sovereign political rights are strictly artificially-proscribed, not inherited, and are a grant of an artificial legal privilege of U.S. law that is not even part of the Constitution at Article II.

This has grave implications regarding court standing and injury regarding Obama’s illegitimacy, because a 14th Amendment “citizen of the United States” is identical to a federal citizen-subject of a federal territory or possession in that neither one is entitled to a “natural born Citizen” President, as neither one of these classes of citizens can be President themselves and they have no substantive natural sovereign political rights recognized in the Constitution to be protected by the natural born Citizen clause of Article II. The natural born Citizen clause of Article II is only meant to protect the political rights of those Citizens of the United States who are also natural born Citizens. Only natural born Citizens have any injury to their political rights if the President is not a natural born Citizen. Therefore, unless you plead your court case by informing the court right up front that you are a natural born Citizen and therefore a Citizen of the United States, and not a “citizen of the United States,” you will have no injury due to Obama’s not being a natural born Citizen, and therefore you will have no standing.

Likewise, one cannot bring a Title 42 Section 1983 case for conspiracy to deprive one of civil rights due to Obama’s not being a natural born Citizen, since the language in Title 42 Section 1983 is meant to protect the civil rights of 14th Amendment federal citizen-subjects or “citizens of the United States.” Federal citizen-subjects such as 14th Amendment “citizens of the United States,” or citizens of the federal territories or possessions, or even those “Citizens of the United States” who are not also “natural born Citizens” have no natural political sovereign rights protected by Article II requirements since they are not entitled to a natural born Citizen President.

“Civil” rights are statutorily proscribed LEGAL rights. Natural sovereign political rights are the rights that are meant to be protected by natural born status, and they are not “civil rights” or legal rights; they are natural rights that are just declared in the Constitution (Positive Law) to be secured and protected by the Constitution (Positive Law). By asserting your rights to be defined by the 14th Amendment, which is what is implied by the use of Title 42 Section 1983, you are essentially informing the court that your status is not that of a “natural born Citizen,” and therefore you have no injury due to Obama’s not being a natural born Citizen, and you automatically lack standing. One must use Title 28, Title 18, and the appropriate sections therein in order to gain standing for the political right injuries that are occurring due to Obama’s illegitimacy. Title 42 does not apply and its use automatically waives any claim of an injury due to your claim of status before the court under Title 42, and therefore you will have no standing. You might be able to use Title 42 in some limited fashion, but you will not be able to raise the fact that Obama is illegitimate as your cause of action under Title 42.

It is not enough to just realize and allege that Obama is not a lawful President; you must show the court how this fact creates a particular concrete injury that is specific to you, or to a minority of the population who are of the same class of citizens to which you belong. This is the reason why no court cases against Obama have gained any traction and over 70 cases have been dismissed for lack of standing regarding Obama’s illegitimacy. Just examine these cases, and it can be seen that none of the pleadings in any of these 70+ cases declare that the petitioners are natural born Citizens with substantive natural political rights, rights recognized and protected by Article II which are being violated, and they fail to show a particular injury to themselves as a result of Obama’s illegitimacy that is not a general injury to the population at large. For example, read the Kerchner case and you will see that nowhere is it stated that CDR Kerchner is a natural born Citizen. In fact, it is stated that Kerchner is a “citizen of the United States,” or in other words, a federal citizen-subject of federal jurisdiction — and therefore not entitled to be guaranteed a natural born Citizen President! Then people wonder why the courts dismiss these cases for lack of standing.

In the Kerchner case, the court seemingly strategically avoided dismissing for the reasons that I have just shown here, since that would have let the cat out of the bag and shown everyone how to bring a proper suit (however, it is entirely possible that the judge is not aware of the above legal reality). Instead, the court fabricated the excuse that the probability of CDR Kerchner being recalled to active duty was so remote that it could not be considered a real injury. A similar tactic was used by the court in the Purpura v. Sebelius case, also due in part to the fact that the Plaintiffs failed to declare themselves to be natural born Citizens and identify how they are a subset minority class, and what the particular injury is that exists to that minority class, regardless of whether or not the health care bill/law applies to them. By failing to properly raise the substantive political right issues in a timely fashion and specify the specific injury caused due to Obama’s not being a natural born Citizen President, those rights are considered waived and the court does not have to recognize them. If the court is not bound to recognize rights that are not properly raised and pleaded, then you have no injury and no standing. This is essentially what is happening in all of the cases against Obama so far. Further on in this dissertation, I will endeavor to show the correct way to raise these issues and the correct injuries to be claimed.
Why Filing a Criminal Complaint, or Millions of Complaints, is Unlikely to Accomplish Anything

What about just filing a criminal complaint with the Justice Department, FBI, or presenting evidence to a Grand Jury? Wouldn’t the sheer number of criminal complaints filed make a difference as to whether or not Obama is prosecuted and held accountable for his treasonous overthrow of our Constitutional Republic? Probably not. But why?

On the face of it, one would think that since it is such an apparent obvious fact that Obama is not a “natural born” Citizen since he was not born to a citizen father, one should just go to the FBI and Federal Justice Department (Federal Prosecutor) with a criminal complaint against the usurper or present such criminal complaint and evidence to a Grand Jury. Then the government should simply obtain an indictment from a Grand Jury and a federal prosecutor should arrest the usurper Obama and try him for the crimes of High Treason and other criminal fraud and racketeering charges. It sounds good in theory, but there are very real practical issues that prevent this from being an effective approach.

First, let’s say you could get a Federal Grand Jury to even take you seriously and look at your evidence. The first thing you would probably encounter might be obstruction of justice by the prosecutor’s office or sheriff’s office as they try to prevent you from contacting the Grand Jury or from presenting your evidence to them, since they falsely believe that the Grand Jury belongs to them and not to you. Then, supposing you could overcome these obstacles, once you have presented your evidence to the Grand Jury, its members must be smart enough to comprehend and believe that your evidence is true and correct before they will even issue any criminal indictments for the prosecutor to prosecute. This is no small task, since the jury members are brainwashed already into believing that being born in Hawaii qualifies as “natural born.” They may just think your allegations are outrageous because everyone knows that a naturalized citizen has all of the same rights as a natural born citizen, right? The Supreme Court has stated this and so has the news media, etc. But let’s say you were able to overcome the practical impossibility of getting the jury to understand the legal realities of “natural born” status, and by some miracle a Federal Grand Jury hands down criminal indictments against Obama for his treason. Then, those indictments would be handed over to a federal prosecutor to prosecute, and guess what? He would probably refuse to prosecute the case, which he legitimately can say is his right because he believes it is a case he cannot win. He can then just hide behind his sovereign immunity from prosecution for his declining to prosecute because he would have realized that it would be next to impossible to ever get a conviction against Obama. Why?

In order for a prosecutor to successfully arrest, try, and convict Obama for High Treason, which is a CRIMINAL OFFENSE, there are two very important elements that must be overcome. First, in criminal matters, the prosecutor must prove that Obama knowingly intended to commit the crime of Treason, or criminal fraud, etc. Second, the prosecutor must convince a jury by the standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt.” These two bars would most likely be impossible for a prosecutor to overcome because Obama and his supporters in the 50 States’ Secretary of State’s Offices who put Obama on the ballot, the Federal Election Commission, the news media, and Congress itself have all helped to create the perfect crime due to lying for Obama to create perfect plausible deniability. By all of these parties covering for each other, they will have put so much doubt into the minds of any potential jury pool that it is very unlikely that an average prosecutor would be intelligent and knowledgeable enough to overcome all of the doubt of the jury and the plausible deniability. I believe this is why none of the criminal complaints so far have been pursued by any federal prosecutors and are unlikely to be pursued no matter how many complaints are filed. This is why they don’t even want to deal with those who try to file these complaints. They just dismiss those who file as crackpots or crazy “birthers” and, given this situation as I’ve just described, it is somewhat understandable why they might feel this way.

Let us take, for example, the element of intent. First, Obama is going to have the best lawyers in the world that money can buy. This case would be of monumental historic significance, and such unprecedented worldwide attention would be on the case that would make the coverage of the OJ Simpson trial look trivial. His attorneys would plead that Obama is not guilty because Obama totally believes that anyone who is born in the United States can be President; and since he was born in Hawaii he must qualify, and therefore he couldn’t have possibly intended to commit High Treason by overthrowing the Constitution.

So what would be his defense on this element of intent? First, he can point to the Federal Elections Commission and Congress who both gave him a pass leading up to the election. Certainly if he was not qualified, those 50 Secretaries of State, State Attorneys General, the Federal Election Commission, the Justice Department and FBI under President Bush, Congress, and the news media would have said something before the election, especially since they declared McCain to be qualified and said nothing about Obama.

Their silence regarding Obama was meant to imply that there was no issue for Obama since he was born in Hawaii. McCain was born in a foreign country, which seems to be why Congress got involved with McCain and ignored Obama, implying that the place of birth is all that matters. Then Obama can point to the CRS memo put out by the so-called legal experts for Congress which determined that the term “natural born Citizen” is not defined in the Constitution and means one born within the soil jurisdiction (both statements are inaccurate).

If it is not defined in the Constitution (a lie), then how can Obama even know how it is defined, let alone knowingly intend to commit treason according to an undefined term? One must first know how it is defined in order to determine if one is intentionally overthrowing a defined term. Then he will just point to a Supreme Court case for a definition and produce quotes that state that a naturalized citizen has all the same rights as a natural born citizen. The exception is the right to be President or Vice President, but the courts leave that part out because the court is talking about all of the same legal rights, not natural rights, and the right to be President is an inherited right which is a natural right, not a legal right. For proof that this is the case, examine this discovery made in a Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 6th edition, 1856. Just look under “N,” look up “NATURALIZED CITIZEN” and read the entry there, paying particular attention to the first sentence of point number 2. But the fact that the courts have said that naturalized citizens have all the same rights as natural born Citizens will substantiate that he believed that it does not make any difference, hence no element of intent.

John Hancock was the first to sign the Declaration of Independence from Great Britain

How will any jury believe that Obama intended to commit treason when the courts say it does not matter if you are naturalized or natural born? It would take a federal prosecutor who has all of the understanding of a natural law philosophy scholar, history professor, political science professor, and a constitutional analyst to overcome the standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt,” and, frankly, I don’t think there is a prosecutor in the entire country who understands enough about Natural Law, Positive Law, the theory of our Constitutional Republic form of government, the philosophy and history behind the Declaration of Independence and Constitution, and the subject of sovereignty, in order to be up to the immense task of teaching and convincing a jury. Heck, Jedi Pauly can’t even get Unity Theorists to understand and accept that the place of birth has no bearing whatsoever on “natural born” in the context of Article II, and those are already convinced that Obama is not legitimate. Imagine how difficult it would be to convince those who believe Obama is legitimate that the place of birth has no relevancy to Article II “natural born” status and therefore Obama is not constitutionally qualified. That is why I don’t think you will ever get a federal prosecutor or Grand Jury to indict Obama and prosecute him, no matter how many criminal complaints are filed.

I am not discouraging anyone from filing a criminal complaint, however, because who knows? It might have a political effect. I am only arguing that if you want to engage the enemy in a battle, then the enemy must be forced to engage with you. If the enemy can simply evade any engagement, which is the case with a criminal complaint filed with a federal prosecutor or FBI, then you can never win a battle that does not happen. In order to have any chance at all of winning the war against tyranny and corruption, one must engage in battles where the enemy is forced to do combat with you and lose and cannot simply evade. This is why I refuse to file a criminal complaint myself, and I prefer a legal suit strategy that forces the defendants into a court of law where they are compelled to engage in a battle with the plaintiff. To that end, I will now outline a strategy that theoretically should force the government into a combat arena to engage in a losing battle with those who file the suit which potentially can remove Obama from Office and prevent him from being on the ballot in the next election.
The Proper Suit Which No One Has Yet Brought


Remember in 1776 the complaint of “taxation without representation?” This was the major injury being suffered by a minority of the King’s subjects which led to the Colonies rebelling and waging war with England and the King in order to free themselves from involuntary servitude, which is slavery. How is our current predicament any different? It is not. A minority of the population of the U.S. citizenry is suffering the same injury under Obama today; yet not one case in the courts so far in over two years, in almost 100 cases, has even bothered to raise this issue or had the awareness to sue the correct injuring parties for this assault and injury to one’s freedom and liberty.


Here is the reality. If you meet these three criteria below, then you are a subset political class of U.S. citizens that are in the minority, who have a particular concrete injury affecting only a minority of the population and not everyone who is a citizen. A suit can be brought by an individual who meets the criteria below, or it can be a class action, since the criteria below identifies a particular “class” of citizens who are all similarly injured.

1) You did not vote for Obama, or you voted believing he was constitutionally-qualified, only to discover later that he was not a natural born Citizen and so you were defrauded in an unlawful election.

2) You are a natural born Citizen yourself, meaning you were either born to a U.S. citizen father or citizen parents, plural; either will do.

3) You are a taxpayer. This is essential to show how you are particularly injured by Obama not being a natural born Citizen (taxation without representation, which is involuntary servitude, outlawed by the Thirteenth Amendment and by most State constitutions, and illegal by the Fifth Amendment).

If you can meet the above three criteria then you have automatic standing in the courts. Here are the particulars of the injuries you are suffering.

Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution states that "No person except a natural born Citizen,...shall be eligible to the Office of President..."


The natural born Citizen clause of Article II is supposed to ensure that the President is born as a natural sovereign representative of the People so that he is a member of the same political class at birth as the number one political class, which is those who have both the right to representation in Congress and the right to be President; in other words, only other natural born Citizens. This is to secure the natural sovereignty of the Nation by guaranteeing that the only person authorized to give his consent on your behalf to the laws (bills from Congress that he signs) is a person from your political class, which is a natural non-privileged inherited class, so that we will not be ruled over by an artificially-inherited privileged class of nobility as we were before 1776.

If naturalized citizens can be President, then the situation is that they are born into a privileged class that is an artificial privilege of sovereignty bestowed by Congress with statutory authority. If Congress can bestow artificial sovereignty with a statute, and those individuals can be President and give their consent on behalf of the superior non-privileged class at birth (all men are created equal), then we are not a country but a world government, because any foreign father can just bring his pregnant wife to America and give birth on the soil and take over the government. A foreign Muslim King from Arabia can just bring his wife to America, or even have an entire harem of American citizen mothers, to give birth on our soil, and his son will be a foreign royal prince or king with a title of nobility who can also be President!

Since Obama is not lawfully qualified by the Constitution, he cannot represent your political class of those of you born to citizen fathers. The entire point of Article II is that your consent to the laws will be obtained by the government by your electing a representative from your political class who is then authorized by the Constitution (Article II natural born Citizen) to make laws on your behalf. Since no consent to any laws has lawfully been obtained for this subset political class, any demand put upon your labor (taxes) to pay for invalid laws to provide benefits for others, where no consent has been obtained from you, is, by definition, involuntary servitude (slavery) or TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION. This is a loss of your natural political LIBERTY or political rights and rights to the fruits of your labor.

Furthermore, since both the State and Federal government have abandoned their responsibility under the Constitution and laws of the land to protect your sovereign political rights and the fruits of your labor from being taken from you without due process of law, the Tenth Amendment kicks in and you now have the duty and right to take matters into your own hands in order to protect your rights from being unlawfully taken from you. This means that you cannot and must not pay your taxes. Why not?


If you voluntarily cooperate with the usurper Congress and President by cooperating with the IRS, then you are voluntarily waiving your claims of the injury of being subject to taxation without representation, and, in effect, you are saying that Obama can represent you. Thus you yourself ultimately become responsible for failing to enforce the Constitution and Article II to secure your own rights, which is now your duty and responsibility under the Tenth Amendment when the government abandons its duty and responsibility to enforce the Constitution and laws to secure your rights. If you now voluntarily pay your taxes, you voluntarily throw away your own political freedom and rights and become a voluntary slave to a dictator government and are guilty of supporting tyranny against your fellow Americans, making you a traitor to them. You cannot claim an injury due to Obama’s illegitimacy, and you have no one to blame but yourself. You rightfully earn the wrath and hatred of your fellow American citizens, to say nothing of those who have fought and died for these freedoms that you are so willing to just throw away. You will be viewed by others as a contemptible loyalist.

But by withholding your taxes in order to secure your sovereign political rights in order to prevent yourself from being placed into involuntary servitude, you now are going to be penalized by the IRS and potentially put in jail and lose your physical liberty just for asserting your lawful sovereign political authority that you have the right to assert now under the Tenth Amendment and which you have no choice but to assert in order to prevent your enslavement. This condition has been foisted unlawfully upon you by Obama, the Congress, the Justice Department, the Federal Elections Commission, and the 50 States’ Secretaries of State who put Obama on the ballot in the federal election, and it is not your fault or due to your actions. You have been injured and placed in this jeopardy by their self-serving fraudulent actions.

Then, your sovereign political rights, consent to the laws, right to representation, right to the fruits of your labor, and right to your physical liberty are all taken from you unlawfully by the IRS’s demand that you pay taxes (provide labor) to a non-representative government which cannot lawfully obtain your consent as long as the President is not a natural born Citizen capable of lawfully representing your political class, as is guaranteed by Article II and the Tenth Amendment.

These are the particular specific concrete injuries that are being suffered by the minority political class of U.S. citizens which we have identified above. This grants standing, and the courts cannot argue against it with any valid reasoning or laws.

The writing of the U.S. Constitution was completed on September 17, 1787
Summation of Injuries (Minimum)

1) Loss of your constitutionally-recognized and protected sovereign political status under the law.

2) Loss of your right of consent to the laws.

3) Loss of the guaranteed Republic form of government.

4) Loss of the right of due process of law.

5) Loss of the right to the fruits of your labor.

6) Loss of your voting rights to a lawful election with valid representatives.

7) Potential loss to your physical liberty if you assert your sovereign rights under the Tenth Amendment to prevent your enslavement by withholding your taxes, so that you will not be subject to taxation without representation, which is slavery.

8) Violation of your rights to be free of slavery under Thirteenth Amendment and State laws.

9) Violation of your equal protection rights due to an election where some classes of citizens have a representative President to vote for and other classes who are entitled to a representative President are denied a valid representative. This scheme permits those who are born with artificial sovereign political rights bestowed as a privileged class at birth to enslave, via an election, the superior and prior non-privileged inherited class at birth, contrary to the Thirteenth Amendment.

At a minimum:

1) The IRS

2) The Justice Department

3) The Federal Elections Commission

Subjects 2 and 3 above have worked in concert along with the News Media (might be a defendant), Congress (immune from suit), the 50 State Secretaries of State and State Attorneys General (both immune from suit), and the Democrat Parties (might be defendants). These parties and defendants have all worked together to empower the IRS to cause all of the injuries listed above. The IRS is the agency which provides the avenue for all of the injuries that are occurring. It is the IRS and its collection of taxes upon the subset political class which attaches the injury, amounting to the rubber-hitting-the-road with respect to the actual mechanism that actualizes the tyranny and loss of your rights due to the criminally-negligent abandonment of the Constitution and Rule of Law.

The above injuries allow one to seek these remedies:

1) Temporary Restraining Order against the IRS to prevent them from enforcing the collection of taxes from the above minority political class of which you are a member until such time as the matter before the court is adjudicated based on the likelihood that you will prevail in court, which is a guaranteed foregone conclusion as a matter of law, and Obama is removed from Office.

2) Declaratory Judgment striking down all laws, executive orders, and appointments passed by Obama and the Congress since his taking office after the 2008 election so that no demand for taxes or borrowing by the government will result from the illegitimate Congress and President.

3) Court Order to remove all judges and executive branch officers appointed by Obama.

4) Declaratory Judgment finding the past and future elections to be invalid regarding Obama, and a Court Order prohibiting Obama from being on any ballot in the upcoming federal election in 2012, or any future elections for President.

5) Judgment for court costs and expenses and any money damages resulting from the injuries listed above.

6) Compensatory damages for emotional stress, aggravation, loss of sleep, etc., caused due to the insults and humiliation suffered for personal attacks against your person and damage to your name and reputation by those who label you a “birther,” crazy, etc. Or, loss of relationships with friends, relatives, and with those in society in general who disagree and support Obama against you which would not have happened if it were not for his fraud and the fraud being committed by many to keep the dictator in power. Many people have suffered quite a lot in their reputation and relationships and become pariahs to common society due to the fraudulent acts of Obama and the listed defendants. I can testify that my ability to concentrate and do my artwork and earn a living has been severely affected, because every day I live in fear and worry as I watch my country being transformed into a slave gulag like Hitler’s Germany. I have suffered financial loss in my work income as a result of Obama’s treason. I haven’t slept restfully for over two years and I have nightmares that someone will pound on my door and put me in jail because I refuse to obey invalid laws passed by an invalid Congress and unlawful criminal President, Judiciary, and Justice Department, etc.

Before the census-takers came around, I experienced great emotional stress waiting for that knock on the door when I knew I was going to have a confrontation with government by refusing to cooperate and answer any questions so I would not be guilty of treason against my fellow American citizens nor waive my political rights and cooperate with a treasonous government. I had to live in fear that I would be prosecuted for failing to comply with the census because I know there is no lawful representative government, and the census is all about representation, and under this so-called government it is now a fraud. I refuse to cooperate with fraud. Next, it will be forced compliance with health care or face fines and jail, and it is not even a valid law to be obeyed. I am already suffering emotionally with worry and fear knowing that the government is going to try to force me against my will to obey an invalid statute signed by a non-representative President and Congress who have not lawfully obtained my consent to any laws. What other invalid laws are going to put me in jeopardy? When will this nightmare end?

7) Punitive damages for the egregious gross negligence and incompetence amounting to criminal negligence by people who are so educationally-deficient and self-serving that they cannot read “natural born” Citizen in the Constitution and understand that this means naturally inherited, thus created by biological birth to citizen parents plural, or at the very least a citizen father, according to worldwide common customs at the time of the Adoption, according to Natural Law. And that the place of birth is a function of Positive Law which produces only “naturalized” citizens and has nothing at all to do with Article II qualifications for President, which is why the place of birth is irrelevant and not sufficient.

King George III was the monarch against whom the Coloinsts fought the Revolution

All of the same offenses that were suffered by our Colonial forefathers in 1776 are occurring once again to U.S. citizens. History is repeating itself, and the political and legal condition of U.S. citizens is now identical in every way to what our Colonial forefathers suffered. The government is behaving like an elite privileged class of nobility lording over the people, ignoring the sovereign political rights and freedoms of the People that Nature guarantees to all mankind, and are meant to be secured to the People by the Constitutional provisions such as the Article II natural born Citizen clause and the Tenth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Thirteenth Amendment, the gold and silver money requirements of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5, and Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1, which were meant to provide us with money that is a natural right to use as a medium of exchange so that we do not invite government jurisdiction onto us for using private corporate fiat currency as a “legal tender” or a legal right, for the extinguishing of debts, which cannot actually pay a debt but just pushes us further into debt and involuntary servitude, enslaving us and future generations forever.

By ignoring Article II nbC provisions, the government has become identical to King George, refusing to recognize the natural equal sovereign authority of mankind. The government has become the master over the people, ruling over us as if we are slaves or citizen “subjects” of their authority and jurisdiction, rather than acting as our servant, subject to our authority and subordinate to our authority.

The courts refuse to recognize the sovereign political status of petitioners and decree that U.S. citizens have no standing in the King’s courts. The Congress is non-representative and incapable of making any valid laws, abandoning its legitimacy by empowering Obama to remain in Office, thereby creating invalid laws that make unlawful demands upon our labor to provide privileges and benefits for foreign powers and themselves, without our consent, all the while refusing to concede to the laws that we the People want and desire for our own benefit and well-being. They fundamentally rob us of our Republican form of governance, subjecting us to the tyranny of a dictatorship that looks more like a royal form of communism than a Republic of sovereign citizens ruled by laws and not men.

They wage war upon the American People by involving us in illegal foreign wars and false flag attacks like 9/11, killing thousands of innocent American citizens to engage us in phony occupations of other people’s countries in order to covet their natural resources (oil) to perpetuate a criminal military industrial complex that already has alternative technology that they keep secret from the American People that would render oil and the need for war to be obsolete. It just goes on and on.

All of these offenses occurred once before back in Colonial times, and all of the offenses came about through the crux of taxation without representation. That is how these offenses against the sovereign rights of the people occur. This is the avenue and vehicle of how the government’s arrogance and unlawful lordship are applied as an injury. It was the same in 1776 as it is today. This is where the rubber hits the road: through taxation without representation. Therefore, withholding your taxes and suing the IRS is the only way to fight back and secure your liberty and your political rights and reverse the relationship regarding who is the master and who is the slave. This is the only way to gain any standing in any U.S. court to address the real and tangible injuries that affect only a subset of the population at large. This is the only lawful power that any sovereign citizen has to peaceably hold government accountable and force Obama’s removal from Office, since the only other authority that is empowered to peaceably remove Obama is Congress and they do not seem interested in exercising their responsibility. This is the only suit that will hit the government where it hurts and force them to engage in combat in a fight that they cannot win. Therefore, that duty falls upon the natural born Citizen taxpayer. Any other lawsuit will fail for lack of standing and for failing to declare any tangible injury that is not general to the entire population. If you do not declare your status before the court as a natural born Citizen so that you will have an injury due to Obama’s not being a natural born Citizen and declare your injury to be taxation without representation, then there is no way you will ever advance a case in court. Virtually every case so far against Obama has been thrown out for lack of standing for no proper injury, because not one of them has attempted what I have described here in this dissertation. This is the only legal strategy that has any chance of gaining standing and removing Obama via the courts that ordinary citizens can accomplish. Other than this, only Congress can remove Obama peaceably. If you are serious about getting rid of Obama and restoring the rule of law, then you must either file your own case or a class-action lawsuit as outlined above.

Jedi Pauly

Natural Law Scholar and Constitutional Analyst

If you are serious about preventing a future Obama dictatorship and removing him and the damage he has done already to your freedoms and finances, then join with me to implement the above plan. Join the real revolution!

Paul Guthrie

Fools Rule America – For Now!


by Ron Ewart, ©2011

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.real problem,

Were those who voted for Obama and big government fools?

(Aug. 12, 2011) — This isn’t racist; it’s factual.

There is a statement, purportedly coming out of a Czech Republic newspaper a while back, that has been circulating the Internet at significant speed. It seems that many outside our country see us better than we see ourselves. The statement, more or less, goes something like this:

“The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.”

“The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.”

So who is this “citizenry” capable of entrusting a man like Obama with the Presidency? We’ll say it if no one else will. For one thing, it is a color issue. Black people in America will vote in lockstep for a black man or a Democrat over 90% of the time. Even Latinos vote in large numbers for Democrats.

You don’t have to go very far to understand why. Democrats are the great “Promisers” of “things” to the people, especially the poor, naive and uneducated ones of which there are millions, using our tax money to pay for the “things” and black people are of a mind that they deserve what they get from the government because after all they have been victims of white racism for a long, long time. Government is only too quick to promote and enhance that perceived injustice.

But before we go any further with this, we will state unequivocally that there are many successful, capable and resourceful black people in America. One was a four-star general, another was a Secretary of State and still another is running for President as we speak. There are tens of thousands more just like them. Those who are successful have thrown off their victim status and overcome the prejudices that are instilled in them from birth to death that white people are their sworn enemy. The reason there are so many poor black people in our inner cities is because they have bought the black-white myth. But what exacerbates the situation for America’s freedom and financial security, is that these people, these exploited fools, who have bought the myth ….. can vote for their own reparations, with government’s enthusiastic assistance.

We are not ignoring the fact that discrimination and racism do exist, but for many black people this is their rationale for being less than they can be and surrounding themselves with people who care so little about each other.

But discrimination is ubiquitous and comes in all forms. If you are too thin, too fat, too short, too tall, uneducated, disabled, or not too smart, you will be discriminated against. It is a fact of life that humans discriminate. If you want to see discrimination in its purest form, go to any one of a number of Asian countries and try to find a blonde head or a black skin.

Most people get over this discrimination and go on with their lives. The weak ones wear it on their sleeves and it robs them of their self-worth, ambition and courage and renders them hopelessly dependent on a government that doesn’t really care one whit about their welfare ….. only their vote.

But it isn’t just Black people with poor images of themselves that drive what ails America. The government has been so successful in buying votes with our money and the people, of any color or ethnic origin, have been so weak in accepting the handouts from government with the mistaken idea that the handouts are free and come with no strings.

Self-reliant, independent and responsible people look for solutions to their problems outside of government. Dependent people think that government is their only salvation and government is only too happy to oblige their dependency ….. in exchange for their vote.

Yes, fools do rule America. Why? Because these fools can vote. But in fact the fools are just pawns of a government that will do anything to increase its power, including exploiting the weak and poor among us as a means to achieve that power, by aggressively taxing self-reliant, independent and responsible Americans to pay for government’s promises to the fools. The more fools, poor and dependent people there are in America, the greater the government’s power, just so long as the producers in America keep forking over their hard-earned money in the form of taxes. But there is strong evidence that the taxpayers are finally putting on the brakes. Hopefully, it is not too late.

Well, now, the unsustainable promises have come home to roost in America, as they have in Europe and other socialist countries. The “Promisers” have run out of other people’s money to redistribute, along their ability to borrow any more. In fact, they have brought us to the brink of national bankruptcy. The fools and the poor have been exploited and the self-reliant, independent and responsible people have been fleeced of the fruits of their labors, by a government that has become adept at pitting both groups against each other for government’s gain. We have been played as victims of a giant Ponzi scheme, like the hapless investors of Bernie Madoff’s grand plan to infinite riches. The taxpayers are finally getting it, with the ballooning debt and expanding deficits taking center stage. But we seriously doubt that the fools and the poor will ever get it.

It may be true that the meek shall inherit the earth one day, but in the end they will get what they deserve because some government, or a small group of powerful men, will be calling the shots and the meek will just be pawns of that government or small group of men, just as they are now. As always, it will be up to the self-reliant, independent and responsible people in America to make sure that America isn’t ruled by the meek, the fools, or the poor. The Tea Party might just represent the self-reliant, independent and responsible people among us. The future of a free and prosperous America may very well depend on it.

It is only a fierce commitment to freedom by millions of Americans that will save America. The dependency of fools that can vote will, in the end, destroy her.

Monday, August 8, 2011

Obamanomics – Huge Success or Total Failure?


by JB Williams, ©2011

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.

Was Obama installed as de facto president with the purpose of entrenching the U.S. in socialism?

(Aug. 6, 2011) — Americans expecting Obama to fix the economy are beginning to lose faith in their messiah as Obama sets new historic lows in America’s economic standing in the world. For the first time in U.S. history, the most prosperous nation ever known to mankind has lost its AAA credit rating under Obamanomics – making Obama the first U.S. President in history to destroy America’s record as the world’s economic superpower.

America’s spend, borrow and print economic policies are sending economic shock waves around the globe. The nation that has provided economic aid to more than eighty-percent of the globe is now in deep economic trouble itself.

The people, who knew Obamanomics would fail, just like every Marxist wealth redistribution system ever tried on earth, have concluded that Obama is an economic nitwit and a monumental fiscal failure. But are they right?

Success is in the eye of the beholder. If you are looking for real free market economic recovery, Obamanomics is a historic failure the likes of which has never before been seen in the United States. But if your agenda is to destroy free-market economics, then Obama’s plan is a success story that communists could only dream of in the past.

For people who want freedom and free-market prosperity, Obamanomics is the abject failure they knew it would be. But for people who want Marxism, Obamanomics is a huge success story, as it threatens to force every American into a financial corner from which they will accept Marxism and socialist global governance rather than individual financial ruin.

Americans have not felt the need to fight communism since the fall of the Soviet Union. Many thought communism died when the Berlin Wall came down under Ronald Reagan. The documentary AGENDA – Grinding America Down demonstrates just how foolish those notions are and just how costly it can be to make such an enormous political blunder.

The fall of the Soviet Empire only caused communism to take a new tactic and strategy as it continued to, well yes, grind America down, or dumb America down, until citizens would accept Marxism under the guise of a more polished title, progressive.

The new tactic was to work from within America’s own government, using democratic processes to advance socialism, known today as Democratic Socialism, currently running all three branches of the Federal Government via the legislative arms of The Democratic Socialists of America, the Black Caucus and Progressive Caucus.

Today’s DNC policy talking points are coming straight from The Communist Party USA. Michigan Democrat John Conyers was a card-carrying member of the Communist Party USA when he formed the Congressional Black Caucus. Vermont Independent Bernie Sanders is a card-carrying member of the Socialist Party USA, and formed the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

Communism is alive and well in America and it is no longer in the closet, or just Hollywood. It is in charge of the Federal Government. These folks understand that America must vote for Marxism. They understand that in order to get Americans to vote for Marxism, they must force the majority of citizens into an economic disaster first, so that the citizens will choose Marxism over starvation for their families.

On this basis, Obamanomics is an enormous success, as it has bankrupted the nation, nearly every state and the vast majority of Americans in less than three years of Democratic Socialist rule in DC.

Obamanomics has accomplished all of the following in record time…

Increased the national debt by almost 50% in less than three years
Forced more than 30% of working Americans into unemployment or under-employment
Forced the economy into an extended depression
Forced banks into bankruptcy
Forced states into bankruptcy
Seized control of several key industries
Set the entire Middle East on fire
Turned old U.S. allies into new enemies
Identified all true American patriots as potential domestic terrorists
Decimated the U.S. Military and Intelligence community
Dismantled the Constitutional Republic using leftist federal courts
Crushed the Tenth Amendment Rights of the states
Turned what was left of the free press into a 24/7 leftist propaganda machine
Turned U.S. law enforcement into an S.S. style Gestapo.
Eliminated congressional oversight of the Executive and Judicial branches
Destroyed the life savings of millions of American families
Turned the Department of Homeland Security into a brown shirt operation
Turned the White House into a playpen for communists and socialists
Destroyed the value of a college education
Forced investors and employers to flee for foreign markets
I could list at least a hundred more items…

These people are not ignorant or inept, having no clue what they are doing. They are evil. They know exactly what they are doing and they are doing it with specific purpose, at break-neck speed and unparalleled precision.

For Americans who want a Constitutional Representative Republic, individual freedom and liberty and old fashioned American prosperity through individual effort and sacrifice, Obamanomics is a disaster of monumental proportions…

But if you are a useless parasite seeking to live on the toil and earnings of others, sucking the life right out of America’s most productive in order to advance your Marxist agenda of confiscating and redistributing other people’s hard earned wealth, then Obamanomics is a grand success story that is on the brink of total success, in which every American citizen will be reduced to Federal Dependents just as poor as the parasites of the world.

We can no longer afford to misinterpret the events unfolding every day in America and around the world.

Ignorance is easily fixed by introducing information, knowledge and wisdom. But there is only one fix for pure evil, and that is to cut it out like the cancer it is, before it consumes the entire body.

At this late stage, the cancer threatens the entire national body and if the people don’t take appropriate measures swiftly, the cancer will consume everything.
Obama Has Done his Job Well: USA All But Destroyed


by Sher Zieve, ©2011

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.

Where is the oversight of Congress and the courts in regard to Obama and his executive branch?

(Aug. 6, 2011) — By now, I assume everyone who isn’t comatose has heard about the Standard & Poor’s downgrading of the USA’s economic stability from AAA to AA+. Despite the White House feverishly working to spin the news for we-the-proletariat–and hinting that ‘it really means nothing’–I suspect there is much celebrating going on behind the scenes. Since ratings were established, this is the first time in History that the United States of America has been downgraded. This is unprecedented in our history. Therefore, Obama is partying hardier than ever. After his Chicago $35,000 per plate birthday bash extravaganza–largely on the US taxpayer–his latest fundraiser planned for next Thursday in New York is designed to bring in $71,600 per plate. And all of this is transpiring while he is on a bus tour–we believe illegally on the US taxpayer–campaign for 2012. Note: As our leftist courts and supplicant US Congress support his every move, no one does anything about Obama’s increasingly criminal behaviors.

The reality is that in order to establish a Marxist-Leninist or Marxist-Mao Utopian parasitic government to destroy the middle-class (who will then in their newly-imposed slavery support the elites) the host country must be utterly destroyed. Said country can then be rebuilt (i.e. “transformed”) into the image of “The One” or The Ones.” In this, I suspect Obama has far exceeded his own training and his Master’s timeframe with what he has wrought upon OUR country…and the world. Truly, he is the first leader (make that “non-leader”) of his type.

Obama is a destroyer par excellence and may, in the end and assuming we do not rid ourselves of him, end up surpassing even Adolph Hitler, Josef Stalin or Mao Zedong. We know he is already brimming with pride over his accomplishments, as we see it in his growing smile–one that is beginning to oddly resemble a Narcissistic and condescending sneer as his eyes become even more sinister.

Obama has destroyed our health care system. Obama is in the process of removing our Bill of Rights. Obama has stolen trillions of our dollars and sent them overseas…some to locations and entities that still remain secret. He has taken over our water and food distribution (shades of Stalin and every other despotic ruler here!). Obama is increasingly talking publicly about ‘the problems of democracies’. Obama’s Operation Gunwalker/Gunrunner–”Fast and Furious” was specifically designed to legally-obtained remove guns from US citizens by blaming the planned murderous outcome of the program on gun shop owners and the US citizenry at large. The Obama-Holder syndicate bosses were caught in their criminal scheme…but, they’re still continuing their plan to dissolve the Second (and therefore all) Amendment.

It has, also, now been revealed that the Obama syndicate and the Sinaloa Drug Cartel has a ‘business relationship’. In return for ‘favors”, the Obama syndicate (aka the “US Obama Government”) allowed the drug cartel to bring tons of cocaine into the USA with encouragement and without consequences. Note: Remember Obama has said his favorite movie it “The Godfather” and our Southern border still remains wide open. Still wonder why?

Now, Obama and the Marxist Democrats (remember that the Democrats took over both Houses of Congress in January 2007) have destroyed the economy…yet, they are still demanding we give them more! Nothing ever satisfies the corrupt and perverse. For the tyrannical ruler, there is never enough. There may not be enough for those who continue to demand they be allowed to suckle even when all the milk has been consumed. But, have you finally and decisively had enough from the Obama syndicate and those who support and collaborate with it? Have you? Isn’t it time that we now begin to demand ever-more-loudly resignations–or prison time–from the parasites who continue to feed off of us? Isn’t it?

“Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those who issue oppressive decrees, to deprive the poor of their rights and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people, making widows their prey and robbing the fatherless.” -Isaiah 10:1-2

“If money is wanted by Rulers who have in any manner oppressed the People, they may retain it until their grievances are redressed, and thus peaceably procure relief, without trusting to despised petitions or disturbing the public tranquility.” Journals of the Continental Congress, 1:105-113

“If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”–Winston Churchill
83% Say Time for Everyone in D.C. to Go!


by JB Williams, ©2011

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.

Have we seen the worst of the downgrading of our credit status, foreclosure crisis and unemployment? Are government policies to blame?

(Aug. 8, 2011) — Less than three years after the Obama Revolution seized control of Washington, DC, only 17% of Americans believe that Washington DC represents them. The other 83% agree that it is time for everyone in Washington, DC to find new employment outside of politics!

Following the historic international headline news that Obamanomics was a total abject failure and Obama is the first president in U.S. history to preside over a monumental loss of U.S. credit standing in the world, Americans appear finally ready to deal with the theft of their government and destruction of their once great nation.

Only 24% of Americans still support Barack Obama, down from 44% on his inauguration day less than three years ago. The overly civilized and sleepy silent majority of Americans are finally awakening to the reality that the golden boy of international socialism and messiah of the Democrat Party has run their country aground – albeit $4.4 Trillion in new debt and the loss of superpower status in the world, too late! They were a little slow in coming to the realization that Obama is either a communist usurper, or a world class disaster!

But options are thin, when considering solutions.

The Executive Branch is run by international socialist dictators
The Judicial Branch is nothing more than a Gestapo for the evil administration
Justice and Homeland Security is a joke, focused only on capturing patriotic citizens
Congress is nothing but a rubber stamp for Democratic Socialism
The press is only the fog horn of the extreme socialist left
Academia is a brain-washing machine for anti-American sentiments
And entertainment is a propaganda machine for Marxism

So, what should 83% of Americans do to right a ship they clearly believe to be off course and headed for the jagged cliffs? Although their constitution remains, it has not been adhered to in decades and like any muscle, it has dramatically atrophied into a greatly weakened state.

Our Founding Fathers gave us a system by which the people could easily protect and preserve freedom, liberty and prosperity for future generations, if we would only be forever vigilant.

Sadly, the people stopped being vigilant almost a hundred years ago and today, although most Americans don’t like what we have, few know what we are supposed to have and even fewer have a clue how to regain it.

The mechanisms put in place to protect the people from tyrannical government are not in place right now. The people cannot turn to the election booth, the court room or even state officials to regain control of their runaway government. So, what options remain on the table?

The People Seek the Solution

But, are they looking in the right places? Where are the people looking? If it’s at the next crop of corrupt, spineless and inept politicians, they are looking in the wrong place. If they are looking to the totally corrupt justice system, they are looking in the wrong place. If they are looking to their soldiers fighting for freedom and liberty abroad, they are looking in the wrong place. We are not Nicaragua or Greece… we do not have votes of no confidence or military coups in America.

To find the only solution we have, the American people must find a mirror, because the people are the solution. Of course, the people are also the problem…

24% of Americans like Obama’s form of totalitarianism – that’s a problem
Another 25% are completely unaware of their surroundings – that’s a problem
25% have no clue what to do, but believe they have all the answers – that’s a bigger problem
16% have a clue what to do, but are afraid to do it – an even larger problem
About 8% know what’s happening, what must be done to stop it, have the guts to do it, but think they can do it in a disorganized, dis-unified, unfunded and chaotic fashion, while shooting at each other – the biggest problem of all
And last but not least, about 2% know what to do – that they have to do it and that they must do it together and soon!

In other words, even though 83% of Americans have now figured out what a disaster the Obama Revolution is, only about 2% are in a position to do anything about it. Everyone else is part of the problem, in one way or another. That’s the bad news…

The good news is this – 2% is enough, if…

They come together in the right place
They prepare in the right ways
They work together in tangible organized strategies
They waste no time doing it…

2% is over six million Americans and six million decent, honest, intelligent, committed and unified Americans, can make anything they want happen in this country.

The U.S. Constitution is the solution and only millions of American citizens who still believe in the principles and values of a Constitutional Representative Republic can force the restoration of this country.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

If the time has arrived, to restore the Constitutional Republic, then the people know what they must do and they must do it while there is still an opportunity to do it peacefully.

Before the people can be mobilized in any such effort, they must first be unified and organized in one place, prepared to speak with one voice and move together in a single direction with one purpose. They must become fully informed. And they must become more committed to their common cause than to their individual agendas.

When the people are prepared to do these things, they can alter the course of history and the direction of their beloved nation. Until then, all the talking in the world isn’t going to make a difference.

If 83% of the nation wants REAL change, in the form of a return to freedom and liberty, they have the power to make it happen. When at least 2% are ready to make it happen, it will happen, and not a moment before.

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Welcome to the OSA (formerly USA), Fellow Slaves!


by Sher Zieve, ©2011

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email

Is our future that of the slaves of Medieval Europe? Is this what we have voted for?

(Aug. 2, 2011) — Today, it all changes. Everything we have known is being transformed. The Obama States of America is officially being established by the former Democrat and Republican parties. Today, we are all Obama-Stalinists and will now happily give everything we own over to the Obama government. In other words, we will embrace our slavery with smiles on our faces–or else.

Despite our efforts to stop it, both Republicans and Democrats voted to give Dictator-in-Chief Obama trillions of dollars more (which we no longer have) in this reality-show marking the end of the manufactured and phony “debt crisis.” Note: There wouldn’t be any crisis if Congress and the illegal POTUS would agree to stop spending and sending our money to their globalist friends overseas. But, they refuse.

The agreement to add additional trillions-of-dollars to our debt–which will now destroy and gut us completely–gives Obama the means to help his reelection campaign and does NOT provide any substantial cuts to spending…if any at all. Where did you think the Tyrant Obama planned to use a great deal of it?

The rumors that this was all a game between the Democrat and Republican parties to try to fool We-the-People into believing they are really working for us were and are true. Boehner and McConnell have just turned the country over to Obama, their planned super committee and Obama’s dictatorship. Neither Establishment Republicans (RINOs…Democrat plants) or the now totally Marxist-Leninist Democrats are working for us or the country. They are working for themselves, against the United States of America and we now fully work for them.

And now US Congressional members have decided–since they haven’t followed the US Constitution for decades–to put into place a “Super Congress” committee that will consist of 12 members; six Marxist-Democrats and six Go-Along-to Keep-our-jobs Republicans. As Paul Joseph Watson writes, the unconstitutional establishment this Super Congress” will command that “legislation decided on by the Super Congress would be immune from amendment and lawmakers would only be able to register an up or down vote, eliminating the ability to filibuster. The Speaker of the House would effectively lose the power to prevent unpopular bills from making it to the House floor.”

Congress now finally realizes the US electorate wants to get rid of all of those who oppose the will of US citizens and Congress members on both sides of the aisle have no intention of leaving their offices due to the votes of the “stupid little people.”

One of the first plans of the Super Congress is to dissolve or severely limit the Second Amendment. Congressional members will cede all authority over the Second Amendment–and therefore the entire Bill of Rights–to themselves and we presume the planned never-to-be-unseated Tyrant Obama. They know that what they are doing will eventually cause a real bloody American Revolution. So, now the entire US government plans to remove our ability to fight them back. Virtually everything Obama and Congress are doing, these days, is illegal.

In October 2008, I wrote the following in my column “Is the USA ready for an American Stalin?”: “After Obama is elected, all of his programs and people to keep him in power indefinitely — and to rid him of any and all opposition — will be firmly in place. You will not be able to vote him out of office. By the time he assumes the position of President of the United States it will already be too late. A democratic republic will last only so long as people of good will allow and fight for it. After they are gone — or removed — it is ended.” It appears this now, also, applies to Congress.

So, welcome to the new and revised (aka “transformed”) world of dictatorship, severe coming suppression, poverty and early death to all US citizens. The Obama syndicate tested our mettle when it commanded its TSA to sexually grope us and our children. We failed. Welcome to your and our abject slavery.

Sometimes, I really hate being prescient.

Definition of “transformed” in ObamaSpeak: The state of being destroyed.