Tuesday, November 13, 2012
prediction based on extensive research...
click on link to view video ... to see why:
(or copy and paste into browser, if link doesn't work)
http://pro.stansberryresearch.com/1210THIRDLIA/LPSINB64/
Sunday, October 28, 2012
October 28, 2012
Deceitful Obama Administration Lies To America To Save Campaign After Willful Inaction Causes Deaths Of American Patriots
Here are facts with enormous implications for the Obama Administration and the elections regarding the Benghazi attacks gathered from over 120 diplomatic cables (some of which have been reportedly leaked by someone in the State Department) and analyzed by multiple reliable sources including FOX News and Veteran Defenders of America. Prior to September 11, 2012 there were increasingly frequent requests by CIA and diplomatic staff in Libya for increased security at the U.S. consulate (which had already been attacked twice, in April and June of this year), the latest occurring the day of a pre-planned mortar attack by Islamic extremists on both the consulate, and five hours later the CIA annex where two SEALs were killed on the rooftop while manning a machine gun position. The two SEALs even provided the coordinates of their attackers to a Special Ops C-130 crew flying nearby but to no avail.
These events raise questions in two areas. First, why were requests for increased security turned down for months and who was responsible? Second, those in the White House situation room which included the President’s national security advisor viewed the attacks in real time via two unmanned drones. During that time urgent help was requested by Ambassador Stevens, soon followed by a request from two (now-deceased) SEALs at the nearby CIA annex that they be allowed to assist the consulate staff. All requests were denied. Why and by whom? Hours later, urgent help was requested at least twice by those at the CIA annex when they came under attack—and that was also turned down. It all lasted seven hours. Military aid was available within a half hour (F16s within 20 minutes, Apache helicopters within one hr, and a C-130 gunship flying nearby). This weekend, according to CIA director Petraeus, no one in the CIA refused requests to assist the trapped Americans in Benghazi. The protocol is for such aid to be dispatched when needed per the military or CIA UNLESS overridden by the Commander-in-Chief. And that is Obama. Obama instead went to bed so he could get up the next morning to fly to a fundraiser in Las Vegas while four Americans died without the assistance they had requested. Why did Obama not approve military assistance? Why did Obama and Hillary Clinton along with others in the Administration lie to the media, Americans and above all, to the families of the deceased that a video clip produced on the West Coast was responsible for a ‘protest’ in which our men died, when they knew in realtime the reality of a terrorist attack and even the radical militants who claimed responsibility for that attack? As an aside, why is that video clip producer in jail until after the election and denied access to the press? Finally, why is the mainstream press trying to ignore these questions? Collusion!
It is obvious to anyone with cerebral circulation that the Obama Administration had an agenda which supersedes protecting our personnel in the Middle East. Could his motive to not provide enhanced security in Libya have been to maintain a low profile towards the locals in Libya? Did Obama deny help to our ambassador and SEALs in order to protect his campaign myth that taking out Osama Bin Laden extinguished much of the terrorist threat from Al-Qaeda? What other explanation is there--incompetence? It appears that Obama and his minions propagated a cover up story to protect his political objectives at the expense of American lives and ultimately American trust (if there was any left). These are not the actions of an honorable patriotic president. Barack Obama appears to be a heartless coward and a liar who should pack his bags and vacate his office and take his Secretary of State with him.
Anyone who is aware of the many coverups which place Americans and our nation at risk and who would still vote for the narcissist anti-American in the White House either has no honor or has not been paying attention to them---like Fast and Furious; like the hundreds of EPA rules coming out right AFTER the elections which will drive up energy prices to unprecedented levels by slapping more regs on the energy industry which will be passed on to consumers; like ordering defense contractors who will lay off workers to defer such announcements until AFTER the election despite a law which requires at least 60 days notice; like cutbacks in Medicare by 716 billion dollars to fund Obamacare AFTER the elections. There are many more.
The BOTTOM LINE: This election differs from any other during my lifetime. America is at a fork in the road between unrestrained dictatorship and a free republic. If you choose to continue the destruction of our republic, vote for Barack Obama, the amateur, dishonest, egocentric Marxist with deep racist views, who openly disrespects American exceptionalism, our Constitutional freedoms with limited government, the rule of law, and our military service people by imposing political correctness, disarming our troops at inopportune times, and providing classified intelligence to certain American newspapers and our enemies. Obama was elected on an empty promise for undefined ‘hope and change’ by naive uneducated voters, the Left, and those who wanted to elect the first black president without regard for his qualifications. Our only chance to reverse the destructive course of the past four years is to vote for former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, an experienced, honest, charitable, business-savvy, pro-Constitutional, the non - racist candidate with a successful bipartisan track record, who respects American exceptionalism and the military strength to defend our freedoms. Romney is the only rational choice if America is to see security through true economic recovery, energy independence, fair trade, removal of oppressive regulations which constrain small businesses which provide the majority of jobs, and most importantly, repealing misguided destructive, bankrupting Obamacare. Your choice is that between preservation of the American dream for our children, or the Left’s transformation of the once strongest, most prosperous country on Earth to a Marxist regime or worse. Do not take your freedom for granted!
Copyright 10/28/2012 by Gulf1
October 1, 2012 TPATH
By Dwight Kehoe
HYPOCRITE and LIAR
THREE ISSUES POINTING TO ONE BIG NIGHTMARE
1. - What you will see when you view the video linked here, is not only happening in Texas, but all across this country. These criminals speak of "voter suppression" by the Republicans, while presenting zero proof and at the same time boldly and unabashedly lie when they say there is no evidence of people voting illegally.
After listening to this political hack, the reporter needed to ask her these questions, of course he didn't, so I will.
1) Miss Ewing, why would you not want the deceased to be removed from the registration roles?
2) What dead person would be denied his/her right to vote?
3) Why would you campaign to keep those names on the list if you did not intend to use them in some illegal way?
2. - Now watch this video by Bradlee Dean and see if Ms. Ewing's comments about voter fraud are even remotely honest.

3. - The third and most scary point is made up of several parts, but explicitly tied together. Much has been said and reported on the over 900 executive orders Obama has signed in his 4 years of destroying our country, and even though many of those were actually continuations and embellishments of previous EOs, the ones he has authored and signed, are frightening.
One after another of these executive orders give the President the authority to end every individual right afforded to us by our Constitution and with no controlling parameters. Just his decision. This would be dangerous enough with a normal President, but in the hands of this one, it will be devastating.
And one very disturbing Executive Order he just signed, Executive Order 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of "increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis".
Can anyone deny that condition exists now, at this very moment?
Now, couple that information with the history of leftist governments and mass murder of their own citizens in order to stay in power, the Executive Orders which allow for the end of civil rights, along with reports that have been sent to TPATH that Obama and his Marxist cronies, unions such as SEIU and other leftist groups, have organized to the point where 250,000 people will claim they were denied the right to vote if Obama loses on November 6th.
Along with "international tensions, economic crisis and massive numbers of American voters being denied the right to vote, how far off would Executive Order 11051 be?
We need to stay vigilant, but it may be too late. You need also to prepare. It could get very ugly.
by Sher Zieve,
Posted October 3, 2012
If you plan to vote for Obama in the 2012 elections, you have identified yourself as being in favor of ending the United States of America and of willingly accepting your position as one of Obama’s slaves.
Observation: I suppose you can aspire to being one of his House Slaves.
You will, also, be voting for the Obama syndicate’s dictatorship over you, your families and all of your yet-to-be-born (if you will even be allowed to procreate at all) progeny. For seniors, your fate is already sealed if Obama retains the Office of the Presidency of the US. He has already stolen $716 Billion from Medicare in order to finance his ObamaCare…which is designed to build his empire out of his newly-formed population of financial and religious (soon-to-be Islam only) slaves.
You didn’t think Team Obama was really planning to provide you with healthcare…did you? Heck, he has a 15-member non-healthcare/non-financially savvy Death Panel which is now poised to say who may live and who must die. Not an exaggeration, folks. Have you actually read the passed-by-the-Democrat-Congress-against-our-will ObamaCare? By the way, for you liberals/leftists in the crowd--you don’t believe that you will be saved do you? If you do, welcome to the Obama Surprise Team. Maybe they will be compassionate and allow you to choose your manner of death.
Since Obama issued his Executive Order to install Amnesty for illegal aliens the EO itself is illegal as he does not have the authority under the [now Obama-discarded] US Constitution) and now said illegals are affecting unprecedented break-ins into the homes of US citizens living close to the US-Mexico border. The rate of these break-ins (see URL for source graph below) has risen exponentially from the date that Dictator-in-Chief Obama issued his criminal Executive Order.
Recently, Obama’s foreign policy (specifically the Middle East) appears to have--by design--weakened the USA almost to its [our] breaking point. Obama hopes this will help him be re-hired, as he is counting on many to not want to switch horses in midstream if there is the chance of a war beginning. Don’t agree that he would do that? Really? Can any POTUS--let alone the Left’s “brilliant” messiah Obama--be that stupid? Well, let’s take a look!
Sunday, October 21, 2012
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Still Don’t Know Who To Vote For? Then Read This
October 15, 2012
There are actually some voters who are still ‘undecided’. Imagine that! There are two reasons for this: either they have been brainwashed by the Leftwing media networks such as CNN and MSNBC which distort reality and thrive on dishonest reporting, or they have no understanding of world history as it relates to the likes of Hitler (and other murderous dictators) or the freedom-crushing ideologies of Communism and Marxism, both of which are alive and well today.
To sum it up, you can vote for a ticket which will defend our Constitutional principles and American free enterprise whereby We the People control our government, OR you can vote for a Marxist ticket rife with corruption which despises American exceptionalism (in the areas of liberty and free enterprise) and believes We the People should be subservient to Fedzilla. It is that simple, folks! Reread this til you get it!
Here are some significant events since my last commentary:
*As if the Administration’s Fast and Furious scandal was not enough, they have now unsuccessfully engaged in a coverup of lax security at the consulate in Benghazi, Libya which resulted in at least four American deaths, despite numerous requests by the diplomatic staff to provide greater protection due to recent Al-Qaeda attacks and known threats to the consulate, even as late as the day before that fateful anniversary of September 11. The Obama administration’s goal was to bury the facts of this debacle in order to preserve the myth confabulated by his election campaign that Al-Qaeda went away after Obama killed Bin Laden. But Al-Qaeda is still a huge force to be reckoned with, and that was clearly demonstrated at a most inconvenient time for the Obama campaign.
Upon further dissection, we note that Obama had but two ‘accomplishments’ during his four years as Criminal-in-chief---the salvage of General Motors (by use of taxpayer stimulus funding for his union cronies and illegally cancelling claims of bondholders) and his killing of Osama bin Laden, the plan for which was already in the works by the Bush Administration when Obama took office, and which narcissist Obama jealously took credit for as a symbol that Al-Qaeda would no longer be a threat without Bin Laden. The campaign’s intent was to milk the death of Bin Laden as cover for lack of any other achievements. To carry this a bit further, Muslim Barry Soetoro Obama has a cozy relationship with The Muslim Brotherhood whose objective is to infiltrate the Free World with Islamic doctrine and Sharia Law. They are well on their way to that goal in parts of Europe but have been rebuffed by Australia. The Obama Administration financially supported them with taxpayer dollars in their quest to become the new ruling party in Egypt as part of the ‘Arab Spring’. Don’t forget that as an Indonesian child, Barry Soetoro was schooled in Muslim doctrine, before his ideology ventured into Lenin’s doctrine of Marxism and Alinsky’s rules for radicals to achieve the Marxist goals to which he clings today (while labeling American patriots as potential terrorists and accusing us of clinging to our Bibles and our guns!). So in an attempt to preserve Obama’s claim to fame, the Admininstration at all levels falsely and wilfully blamed the attack and murder of our consultate officials on an irrelevant 13 minute video for more than one week, until that myth was debunked at Congressional hearings last week by chief military and intelligence officials to whom the Obama Administration is now trying to shift the blame. Even during his VP debate, Joe ‘Bully’ Biden stated that neither he nor Obama had any idea that Al-Qaeda was responsible for the attack, when in fact they either did and lied about it, OR did not because they were missing about 40 percent of the daily national security briefings (a known fact).
* What other coverups by this Administration are lurking out there, hidden from the eyes of Americans?
Can you spell FRAUD? According to The Daily Caller, RNC Chairman Priebus has demanded an immediate investigation into Obama campaign donations in regards to Obama's massive foreign campaign donations, the Secret Service concerning apparent overseas money laundering, and credit card fraud in connection with a third party campaign site, Obama.com, a website owned by Obama bundler Robert Roche, a U.S. citizen living in Shanghai, China who also happens to be Chairman of ACORN International (we all know about ACORN’s massive election fraud tactics). Did I not warn you about the necessity for fraud if Obama is to be reelected? Obama's overseas fund-raising scheme appears to violate Patriot Act laws concerning international money laundering. The Government Accountability Institute issued a 108 page report concerning massive Obama campaign fund-raising irregularities. And don’t forget the number of requests by our military for absentee ballots is only ten percent of that in the last election. It appears the Obama Administration not only opposes voter ID but is trying to block our military men and women from their right to vote.
*The VP debate has received a lot of press when in fact it was no debate at all, but simply a perfect display of VP Joe ‘Bully’ Biden’s liberal mental disorder pathology--and bad teeth. Paul Ryan and the audience of normal Americans saw his pathology immediately and Ryan conducted himself quite well under those circumstances. Biden engaged in repetitive lies in an attempt to run cover for the Obama Administration’s failures such as the Libyan consultate disaster amongst others. As expected, he displayed the classic tactics of Saul Alinsky through nonstop interruptions, incessant talking over his opponent, denial of facts, changing the subject when put on the spot, outright lying, and emotional displays to bury the reality of the moment. And the Dems actually think he set a good example for Obama’s style in his next debate! No one (especially women) likes bullies or dishonest politicians like Biden (except the leftwing media and socialists).
Undecided voters must look past the Leftwing’s misrepresentations of the Romney-Ryan ticket designed to divert attention away from the abysmal failure and willful destruction of this Marxist president. It is categorically false that Romney does not care about women or the middle class (a label which was invented by Marxists as they created various classes of society). In contrast, the DNC is adverse to Christian and Jewish women by removing any reference to God from their platform, by preventing Christians but NOT Muslims from handing out literature outside the Charlotte Convention center, and by trying to make contraception a tax-payer funded mandate as a ploy to secure the vote of naive younger women. With regards to the ‘middle class’, Biden stated it best through his gaffe a few weeks ago that the middle class has been buried during the past four years---TRUE! They have suffered during the longest recession since the Great Depression with high unemployment due to Obama’s policies of rewarding cronies with stimulus money instead of reducing burdensome regulations and taxes on small businesses which are responsible for the majority of jobs in America. We must make a change before the Left drives all of us off the cliff. Vote accordingly if not for your children’s sake to save the American dream!
Copyright 10/15/2012 by Gulf1
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
from The Betrayal by David-Crockett
The Post & Email
THERE IS MUCH EVIDENCE TO SHOW THAT AN AGREEMENT WAS MADE TO PUSH OBAMA AND IGNORE THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN REQUIREMENT
By Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. , Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff , Kerchner v Obama & Congress
© 2009/2010
I Believe The Fix Was In for the 2008 Election and The Cover Up is Still Going Strong!
Constitution(Jan. 24, 2010) — I believe that the RNC and DNC at the highest levels in 2008 were both complicit in shutting down all discussion of Obama’s eligibility issue in the Congress, Main Stream Media, Print Press, and in the leading conservative Talk Show radio stations. I believe that the RNC and the DNC were complicit in subverting Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of our Constitution as to the eligibility requirements for the Office of the President, i.e., the person eligible for that office must be a “natural born Citizen“, i.e., one born in the country to parents who are both citizens of the country such that the child born has singular and sole allegiance at birth to the USA and no citizenship at birth with any other country via his parents or due to the place or location of birth.
A natural born Citizen needs no law or resolution of Congress to give or clarify citizenship status. Natural born Citizenship status can only be obtained by the facts of nature at the child’s birth. This is natural law. This is what the founders and framers of our Constitution required for the singular and most powerful office of the President and Commander in Chief of the military.
John Jay and George Washington put that requirement into the Constitution for exactly the reason that the person serving in that office would have no foreign influences on him/her at birth due to the facts and circumstances of his/her citizenship at birth. Only “natural born Citizenship” in the USA per natural law guarantees no other allegiance or citizenship claims by an another country at birth. If you are born on the U.S. soil of parents who are both citizens, no other country can claim you as a Citizen of their country and you are only governed by the laws of the USA at your birth.
This is natural law as written by Vattel in 1758 in his legal book, “The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law“. The 1775 edition of this legal book was used as a reference by Benjamin Franklin and other founders to set up our new nation in 1776 in the writing of the Declaration of Independence and also in drafting the new form of federal government in 1789 and the writing of our Constitution, the fundamental law of our nation. Obama was born British. How can a person be born a British Subject be considered to be a “natural born Citizen” of the USA, to constitutional standards? He cannot. Our founders must be rolling over in their graves witnessing what transpired in the 2008 election cycle.
Both parties put up questionable candidates in 2008 as to their birth citizenship, Obama was born as a British Subject and McCain was born in Panama, and then they proceeded to cover up for each other and helped shut down the media and talk radio totally via their respective high contacts in the media industry and elected officials within the sitting Bush administration and in Congress as well as within their own respective presidential campaign organizations. No one in either political party wanted a free and open debate in the media as to the true historical, constitutional, and Supreme Court common law cases mentioning Vattel and his words on the meaning of “natural born Citizen”. No one in either political party wanted a full Congressional hearing about the true meaning of Article II of the U.S. Constitution concerning and who is eligible to be President and Commander in Chief of the military, especially in the case of Obama whose father was not even an immigrant to this country, let alone a citizen.
We are a nation of immigrants. But Obama’s father was never one. The political parties and powers in DC wanted to hide this issue from the American people for the political ambition and power of both political parties to run the candidate of their choice irrespective of Constitutional issues. They did not want to hear from the People about this. So the cover up began to squelch all discussion of it to keep as many people in the dark as possible. “Thou shalt not talk about the presidential constitutional Article II eligibility issues ” was the word put out by all the powers to be in Washington DC and the USA media. It was reported that even outright threats were made to certain conservative talk show radio hosts in the last quarter of 2008.
And it continues to this day, imo, and is most obvious with the stone silence and “cone of silence” and occasional mocking comments made by the talk show hosts about the eligibility issue questions if mentioned briefly by a guest now and then on Fox News. The approach on Fox News is to ban the topic.
Other networks such as MSNBC simply mock the movement continually using Saul Alinsky’s tactics from Rules for Radicals rule number 5, ridicule, to stifle all open, serious, and public debate on the issue and to scare off any one in political power from broaching the subject. Anyone even just mentioning this issue is pounced on for the ridicule treatment by the press.
This shut down of a free and full “on air” debate of the Obama eligibility issue with serious scholars and legal experts representing each side (such as my attorney, Mario Apuzzo) being allowed on the air together with someone from the Obot side to debate this issue openly is being orchestrated at the highest levels of the RNC and DNC and their elected official type contacts in various powerful positions both today and back in Dec 2008 and early Jan 2009. Whispers in the hallways allude to grave consequences if one breaches this subject seriously on the air ways.
The RNC silenced opposition in the conservative talk show radio and elsewhere in late 2008 which has enabled Obama to take power virtually unopposed as to addressing his constitutional eligibility in any serious manner in public debate via the national media. The leadership of the RNC at the highest levels, imo, shut down members of their own political party in Congress and via using their contacts in the highest levels of government, they helped shut down conservative talk radio and TV hosts with innuendos and and whispers of the consequences if this subject surfaced for discussion in a major way on their shows. They were told to keep the eligibility issue and the so called “Birthers” banned on their callers list with special instructions to the call screeners to keep them off the air. The RNC powers to be and their political connections used their power to do this to cover up their own subverting of Article II of the Constitution via putting up a candidate of their own with questionable natural born Citizenship status as their candidate for President. The big liberal media anointed Obama (a hard core progressive and Socialist) and then anointed McCain (a progressive light) because they knew McCain had a citizenship issue of his own and thus would keep him silent about Obama’s. And it worked. A “cone of silence” was dropped on the eligibility issue in the DC media and Congress and elsewhere in American to cover up for what both parties were doing, subverting Article II of the U.S. Constitution in the 2008 election. Listen to this radio show interview for more details.
Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner on Andrea Shea King Radio Show hosted by Andrea Shea King – Friday, 22 Jan 2010, 9 p.m. EST: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/askshow/2010/01/23/the-andrea-shea-king-show
Imo, when this subversion of our Constitution in the 2008 election cycle and the massive cover up by people in the highest levels of the RNC and DNC and their elected official contacts, and our government is exposed, this will be a far worse scandal than Watergate. It will be the worst scandal & political crisis and constitutional crisis in America since the Civil War. Who will win the Pulitzer Prize for exposing this travesty to the Constitution, liberty, and justice in America.
I believe this is what has happened in America and the reason for the cone of silence about Obama’s citizenship issues since the start of the 2008 election cycle and it continues to this day. It is a national disgrace and a threat to our freedom and liberty and the survival of our Constitution and Republic. We do not know Obama’s true legal identity. He has hidden and sealed all his early life records. What is he hiding? How can we trust this man usurping the Oval Office to protect America from foreign influence at the highest levels. He bows to Saudi Kings! He backs far-left dictators in Central America like Castro and Hugo Chavez in stifling freedom and Constitutional government in Honduras. Maybe he saw what could happen to him in the Constitutional crisis down there. Who is Obama loyal too? We do not know who he really is. The eligibility issue must be fully and openly discussed in the Main Stream Media, the Congress, and in our Courts. Our liberty and freedom is in the balance.
God bless and protect America in the coming test this year of our fundamental core constitutional rights and our very freedom as this cover up is further exposed.
Signed,
Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. , Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff , Kerchner v Obama & Congress
For more information on the lawsuit: http://puzo1.blogspot.com
To help the cause, please visit: http://protectourliberty.org
© 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified.
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
from The Betrayal by David-Crockett
Also see:
* PRAISE THE LORD: The Scott heard ’round the world
* Brown’s Victory will signal Second American Revolution
* Scott Brown WON!!! - Thanks Pamela Geller
Atlas Shrugs
image
image
As prepared for delivery (hat tip KLO)
Thank you very much. I’ll bet they can hear all this cheering down in Washington, D.C.
And I hope they’re paying close attention, because tonight the independent voice of Massachusetts has spoken.
From the Berkshires to Boston, from Springfield to Cape Cod, the voters of this Commonwealth defied the odds and the experts. And tonight, the independent majority has delivered a great victory.
I thank the people of Massachusetts for electing me as your next United States senator.
Every day I hold this office, I will give all that is in me to serve you well and make you proud.
Most of all, I will remember that while the honor is mine, this Senate seat belongs to no one person and no political party - and as I have said before, and you said loud and clear today, it is the people’s seat.
Interim Senator Paul Kirk has completed his work as a senator by appointment of the governor, and for the work he has done, I thank him. The people, by their votes, have now filled the office themselves, and I am ready to go to Washington without delay.
I also want to thank Martha Coakley for her call of congratulations. A hard contest is now behind us, and now we must come together as a Commonwealth.
This special election came about because we lost someone very dear to Massachusetts, and to America. Senator Ted Kennedy was a tireless and big-hearted public servant, and for most of my lifetime was a force like no other in this state. His name will always command the affection and respect by the people of Massachusetts, and the same goes for his wife Vicki. There’s no replacing a man like that, but tonight I honor his memory, and I pledge my very best to be a worthy successor.
I said at the very beginning, when I sat down at the dinner table with my family, that win or lose we would run a race which would make us all proud. I kept my word and we ran a clean, issues oriented, upbeat campaign - and I wouldn’t trade that for anything.
When I first started running, I asked for a lot of help, because I knew it was going to be me against the machine. I was wrong, it was all of us against the machine. And after tonight we have shown everyone that - now - you are the machine.
I’m glad my mom and dad, brothers, sisters, and so many family members are here tonight.
Once again, before I go any further, I want to introduce somebody very special… That is my wife, Gail.
And as you know, my wife Gail couldn’t join me on the campaign trail because of her work as a Boston TV journalist. But I will let you in on a little secret. She didn’t stay neutral today, and she voted for the winner. I rely as always, on Gail’s love and support and that of our beautiful daughters.
Arianna will be returning a day or two late to her pre-med studies at Syracuse, because she’s been giving her all to this campaign. As always, Arianna and her sister Ayla have been a joy to Gail and me, and we’re so grateful to them both. Even before her campaign performances, millions of Americans had already heard Ayla’s amazing voice on “American Idol.” As Boston College basketball fans know, she’s also pretty good on the court.
If the President thinks they’ve got basketball talent at the White House, I ask him to pick his best teammate and find some time to play two-on-two with Ayla and me.
I’m grateful to all those from across Massachusetts who came through for me even when I was a long shot. I especially thank a friend who was there with encouragement from the very beginning, and helped show us the way to victory - former Governor Mitt Romney.
I’ll never forget the help of another man who took the time to meet with me months ago - who told me I could win, and gave me confidence for the fight. It was all so characteristic of a truly great and heroic American, and tonight I thank my new colleague, Senator John McCain.
On a night like this, when so many people mark your name on a statewide ballot, you think back to the first people who gave you a chance and believed. For the trust they placed in me, and for all they have taught me, I thank my neighbors and friends in my Senate district and especially my hometown of Wrentham. The cause and victory that all America has seen tonight started right there with all of you.
Let me tell you when I first got the feeling something big was happening in this campaign. It was when I was driving along and spotted a handmade, Scott Brown yard sign that I hadn’t actually put there myself.
This little campaign of ours was destined for greater things than any of us knew, and the message went far beyond the name on the sign.
It all started with me, my truck, and a few dedicated volunteers. It ended with Air Force One making an emergency run to Logan. I didn’t mind when President Obama came here and criticized me - that happens in campaigns. But when he criticized my truck, that’s where I draw the line.
We had the machine scared and scrambling, and for them it is just the beginning of an election year filled with surprises. They will be challenged again and again across this country. When there’s trouble in Massachusetts, there’s trouble everywhere - and now they know it.
In every corner of our state, I met with people, looked them in the eye, shook their hand, and asked them for their vote. I didn’t worry about their party affiliation, and they didn’t worry about mine. It was simply shared conviction that brought us all together.
One thing is clear, voters do not want the trillion-dollar health care bill that is being forced on the American people.
This bill is not being debated openly and fairly. It will raise taxes, hurt Medicare, destroy jobs, and run our nation deeper into debt. It is not in the interest of our state or country - we can do better.
When in Washington, I will work in the Senate with Democrats and Republicans to reform health care in an open and honest way. No more closed-door meetings or back room deals by an out of touch party leadership. No more hiding costs, concealing taxes, collaborating with special interests, and leaving more trillions in debt for our children to pay.
In health care, we need to start fresh, work together, and do the job right. Once again, we can do better.
I will work in the Senate to put government back on the side of people who create jobs, and the millions of people who need jobs - and as President John F. Kennedy taught us, that starts with an across the board tax cut for individuals and businesses that will create jobs and stimulate the economy. It’s that simple!
I will work in the Senate to defend our nation’s interests and to keep our military second to none. As a lieutenant colonel and 30-year member of the Army National Guard, I will keep faith with all who serve, and get our veterans all the benefits they deserve.
And let me say this, with respect to those who wish to harm us, I believe that our Constitution and laws exist to protect this nation - they do not grant rights and privileges to enemies in wartime. In dealing with terrorists, our tax dollars should pay for weapons to stop them, not lawyers to defend them.
Raising taxes, taking over our health care, and giving new rights to terrorists is the wrong agenda for our country. What I’ve heard again and again on the campaign trail, is that our political leaders have grown aloof from the people, impatient with dissent, and comfortable in the back room making deals. And we can do better.
They thought you were on board with all of their ambitions. They thought they owned your vote. They thought they couldn’t lose. But tonight, you and you and you have set them straight.
Across this country, we are united by basic convictions that need only to be clearly stated to win a majority. If anyone still doubts that, in the election season just beginning, let them look to Massachusetts.
Fellow citizens, what happened in this election can happen all over America. We are witnesses, you and I, to the truth that ideals, hard work, and strength of heart can overcome any political machine. We ran a campaign never to be forgotten, and led a cause that deserved and received all that we could give it.
And now, because of your independence, and your trust, I will hold for a time the seat once filled by patriots from John Quincy Adams to John F. Kennedy and his brother Ted. As I proudly take up the duty you have given me, I promise to do my best for Massachusetts and America every time the roll is called.
I go to Washington as the representative of no faction or interest, answering only to my conscience and to the people. I’ve got a lot to learn in the Senate, but I know who I am and I know who I serve.
I’m Scott Brown,
I’m from Wrentham,
I drive a truck, and I am nobody’s senator but yours.
Thank you very much.
Sunday, January 3, 2010
In South Carolina, the Democratic Party’s Carol Fowler broad brushed that:
“The South Carolina Democratic Party certifies that each candidate meets, OR WILL MEET BY THE TIME OF THE GENERAL ELECTION, or as otherwise required by law, the qualifications for the office for which he/she has filed.” (emphasis mine -- see page 2 of the pdf, dated August 14, 2008, and received 11:43 AM by the South Carolina Election Commission on August 15, 2008.)
http://moniquemonicat.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/obama-south-carolina-sec-of-state-respons.pdf
Fowler, it seems to me, went on promises and lies from Democratic Party Leaders and top Obama Campaign handlers, instead of having before her a de facto legal documentation. The "we'll have it for you later" excuse. To me, that either equals fraud or the possible intent to defraud.
Connecticut’s Secretary of State, claimed they had NO right to even ask Obama for verification to prove he was eligible to run!
http://moniquemonicat.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/obama-sec-of-state-connecticuit-fax-name-removed.pdf
"As Secretary of the State of Connecticut, I do not have the statutory authority to remove a candidate from the ballot unless that candidate officially withdraws...Likewise, neither the Connecticut General Statutes nor the Constitution of the State of Connecticut authorizes me to investigate a Presidential candidate's eligibility to run for the office of President of the United States." Secretary of State, Susan Bysicwicz (Connecticut).
She further went on to say that Attorney General Richard Blumenthal presented the Connecticut State Supreme Court Justice, Chase T. Rogers, that he made a phone call to Hawaii's Department of Health and was told to the effect, "Yeah, we got A birth certificate on Barack Obama".
When asked if Obama was born there, the answer was to the effect of "Yeah". No details as to where.
The Attorney General never asked if or not Barack was a "Natural Born Citizen", nor inquired to his parents, and if any Treaty with another nation had claim on Barack. How do we know Barack was born in Hawaii...by official documentation? No. The heresay of what someone in Connecticut said another person on the phone told him. This is legally inadmissable in the context it was presented as, and the Chief Justice of Connecticut accepted the here-say contrary to the rules of admissability and evidence as the prima facie for what can or cannot throw out a case.
The Court received no photo-copy of the original, and hence, there were NO documents that could be requested under the Freedom of Information Act.
Chief Justice Rogers should be censured for his misconduct, at the very least.
For the Election of 2008, Barack never submitted any crucial proof citizen documents for review, even to the Courts, in order to run for President.
Not one Secretary of State has ever come forth in the Birth Certificate controversy and ever said..."we have seen his Birth Certificate".
Is the Media totally aslep on that? Barack should have submitted his proof to run when he first announced that he would run in 2007, and before he received his Secret Service protection detail.
Never did Barack show proof that he was even qualified under Constitutional Article 2.1.5. as a child born on US soil to two US Citizen parents. He could not then, and he cannot ever do so; because his biological father was never a US Citizen, and he himself tells us this in his own auto-biographical book, published over a decade before his announcement to run for the US Presidency.
In 2008, Obama's Campaign chose to bypass taking Federal Tax Dollars and be non-accountable to the Federal Elections Commission in campaign laws governing the FEC's right of inquiry as to his qualifications to hold the office of the Presidency (in regards to his NBC status or the lack thereof).
The FEC appears to have claimed to have NO AUTHORITY TO ASK, and passed the responsibility of vetting Obama’s “Citizen and Qualification Status” off to the State of Illinois, when it was governed by a Governor whom the State of Illinois itself called corrupt and later saw dismissed.
Sunday, October 18, 2009
America at RISK
Congress and the Media Have Placed America at Risk of Being Attacked from Within
A Place to Ask Questions To Get the Right Answers published
An election for President and Commander in Chief of the Military must strive to be above reproach. Our public institutions must give the public confidence that a presidential candidate has complied with the election process that is prescribed by our Constitution and laws. It is only after a presidential candidate satisfies the rules of such a process that he/she can expect members of the public, regardless of their party affiliations, to give him/her the respect that the Office of President so much deserves.
All those who have been following the Obama eligibility issue well know that Article II, Section 1, clause 5 provides that “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President. . .” At this blog, I have already explained the importance of the “natural born Citizen” clause. See my essay entitled, Why the “Natural Born Citizen” Clause of Our Constitution Is Important and Worth Preserving, located at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/why-natural-born-citizen-clause-is.html. In order for Obama to prove that he is an Article II “natural born Citizen,” he must conclusively demonstrate that he was born in the United States to a United States citizen mother and father. For legal support for this definition of what an Article II “natural born Citizen” is, see, among others, my articles at this blog entitled, The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth, located at
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-born-citizen-clause-requires.html;
Article II “Natural Born Citizen” Means Unity of Citizenship At Birth, located at
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/article-ii-natural-born-citizen-means.html;
and ‘The Law of Nations or Principles of Natural Law’ as U.S. Federal Common Law Not English Common Law Define What an Article II Natural Born Citizen Is, located at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/08/law-of-nations-and-not-english-common.html.
At present, there is much controversy regarding where Obama was born. We have seen much contradictory information regarding this issue. Obama maintains he was born in Hawaii at Kapi’olani Medical Center and as his best evidence he has posted on the internet a computer-imaged Certification of Live Birth (COLB, which is a summary of his alleged long-from hospital-generated birth certificate) to prove that fact. According to the laws of Hawaii, this summary document, which does not contain information as to which hospital he was born in or what doctor delivered him, is only prima facie evidence of a birth in Hawaii. On the other hand, there exists evidence that Obama was born in Kenya. For a presentation of this evidence, see my essay on this blog entitled,
Obama Has Not Met His Burden Of Proving He Was Born In Hawaii, located at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/obama-has-not-met-his-burden-of-proving.html. Additionally, just over the last few days, we have seen surface on the internet old newspaper articles that were written in African newspapers in 2004 stating that Obama was born in Kenya. http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/video-documents-discovery-of-ap-story-declaring-obama-kenyan-born/; http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/2-more-african-news-agencies-declare-obama-kenyan-born/; http://thepmnews.com/2008/11/25/two-nigerians-tipped-as-potential-%E2%80%98british-obama%E2%80%99. Because of this conflicting information, the prima facie validity of the COLB must fail. Hence, Obama should present evidence that corroborates his and the State of Hawaii’s position that he was born in Hawaii and that he is a “natural born Citizen. He has without good reason refused to provide this evidence.
It has been reported how past Hawaiian State practices with its birth certificate procedures have presented opportunities for birth certificate fraud. An example of such fraud is that of Chinese native, Sun Yat Sen, one of the founders of the Republic of China, who was born in China but was able to obtain a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth in 1904 based on his fraudulent affidavit and evidence submitted by witnesses to the Hawaiian authorities stating that he was born in Hawaii on November 24, 1870. http://www.scribd.com/doc/9830547/Sun-Yatsen-Certification-of-Live-Birth-in-Hawaii. See also the September 2000 report of the Office of Inspector General, entitled “Birth Certificate Fraud,” which provides an update on the nature and extent of birth certificate fraud, found at http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-07-99-00570.pdf. Because of critical importance of knowing for sure who the President is, the potential for birth certificate fraud, and since Obama’s original long-form birth certificate housed in the offices of the Hawaii Department of Health can be some type of certificate (even a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth) that is based on some family member’s affidavit of personal knowledge but which includes no documentary evidence of an actual birth in Hawaii, it becomes crucial to confirm whether there exists any corroborating evidence of Obama actually being born in Hawaii. Consequently, various members of the public have tried to obtain information that would adequately confirm Obama’s and the State of Hawaii’s statements that he was born in Hawaii. These concerned citizens have made requests to the State of Hawaii and to various hospitals there for such information. The State of Hawaii, Kapi’olani Medical Center, and Queens Medical Center (originally claimed by Obama’s sister to by his birth place) have publicly stated that they cannot release the needed details of Obama’s birth, including whether his deceased mother was even a maternity patient in any of those hospitals, because of Obama’s state and federal privacy rights. Not being successful, some of these concerned citizens, feeling duty bound to the Constitution and our country, have filed law suits and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) actions against Obama and others to obtain this information.
Given that Obama and/or his agents have already publicly released some information regarding his place of birth, one commentator, William, has asked me on my blog ( http://puzo1.blogspot.com/. ) whether Obama has waived his privacy rights to such birth information. At least two arguments can be advance that Obama has waived any privacy right that he might have in his birth information located in the State of Hawaii and in its hospitals. One is that he has waived his privacy rights to his alleged long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate by posting his COLB on the internet for the world to see. A problem with this argument is that the COLB does not disclose all his private information (name of hospital, doctors, etc.) and he can argue that his waiver is only as to the information contained on the COLB and no more. As a response, it can be argued that Obama waived his privacy right as to the identity of the hospital in which he was born given that he allegedly wrote a letter dated January 24, 2009 to Kapi’olani Medical Center in which he acknowledge being born there and which letter the hospital posted on its web page (suspiciously posting not a scan of an actual paper letter but only a computer-generated image created with HTML code) for the world to see. For more details, see the WND story on the letter at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=104146. I have grave doubts whether this letter is authentic given that both Obama and U.S. Rep. Neil Abercrombie D-Hawaii, who allegedly gave the letter to the hospital and publicly read the letter during the hospital’s centennial celebration, refuse to confirm whether this letter is real.
The second argument is more powerful and convincing. Under Article II, a would-be President must be a “natural born Citizen” to be eligible for the Presidency. Hence, any candidate knows that such “natural born Citizen” status is required to hold the public Office of President. No one winning an election and wanting to fill that public office has a reasonable expectation of privacy as to where he/she was born given that job’s eligibility requirement that one must be a “natural born Citizen.” See my article on this blog entitled, Obama’s Personal Right To Privacy Cannot Trump The Right Of The People To Know Who Their President Is, at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2008/12/obamas-personal-right-to-privacy-cannot.html. Of course, that person’s obligation to prove his/her “natural born Citizen” status includes providing credible, competent, and sufficient documentary and other evidence of, among other things, place of birth. Clearly and without doubt, the public interest in knowing that the President-elect is eligible for the office he/she seeks to fill by far out weighs any privacy interest that the person may have in his/her birth documents. It is also clear that knowing who the person is who will occupy the Office of President and Commander in Chief concerns national security and the safety of the United States and the whole world. It is not reasonable to believe that such a person’s privacy interest would out weigh the People’s need to safeguard national security and for self-preservation. Simply put, it would be beyond absurdity to honestly contend that such a person has a right to shield from the same People that he/she is constitutionally duty bound to serve and protect information that he/she must provide to them to show that he/she is qualified for that singular and all-powerful public position which would vest him/her with great power to affect every aspect of the People’s lives.
But underneath the privacy rights question lurks a much more serious concern. We can see the absurdity of Obama sitting on privacy rights to conceal his long-form birth certificate from the public. It is downright despicable for our media and Congress and others to apologize for Obama and let him get away with it. They know full well that he has no such privacy rights. The birth information and documents that Obama refuses to reveal to the public surely are revealing of whether his is eligible to hold the Office of President. Why has the media not filed any legal actions against Obama, the State of Hawaii, and other parties, seeking to legally lift any privacy barriers to Obama’s birth information as it has so many times in the past filed actions against others running for public office who sought to prevent the public from learning details of some aspect of their private lives? What is a travesty of justice is that Obama was probably able to win his U.S. Senate seat because the media (Chicago Tribune) filed a legal action against rival Republican Jack Ryan in which it was successful in getting the “kinky sex” details of his divorce released to the public. Why the media in our country would believe what type of sex two consenting married adults practice is more important than making sure that the national security of our country is protected is beyond comprehension and represents the quintessence of warped priorities. I do not believe that anyone who truly cares about our country and Constitution can express enough in words the outrage that he/she feels about how cowardly our political leaders and media have acted with Obama on the question of his place of birth.
Congress has abdicated its constitutional oath and the media, the so-called fourth branch of our government, has failed to perform its journalistic duty to the People of the United States to assure them that Obama’s election to the highest and most powerful office in the land adhered to our Constitution and laws. Congress has been given a chance to correct its failings and still it refuses to perform its constitutional obligation. With the assistance of its media cronies and others, they all ridicule and suppress the efforts of those who are fighting to make sure that our Constitution has been respected in the last Presidential election and that our nation is safe with Obama currently occupying the Presidency and being the Commander in Chief of our military might.
We must then ask ourselves why Congress and the media have not pressed Obama for the necessary and relevant birth information for at least the sake of the integrity of the Presidential election process and the safety of our nation? Moreover, Obama cannot be an Article II “natural born Citizen” because under the British Nationality Act of 1948 when Obama was born in 1961 his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was born a British subject/citizen. See Obama, the Putative President of the U.S., Is Currently Also a British Citizen, located at http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_29.html. Like a naturalized citizen who is not eligible to be President, Obama was born with an allegiance to a foreign power and is therefore not eligible to be President and more so not eligible to be the leader of our military men and women. To allow Obama to hide his birth information and to not challenge him for not being an Article II “natural born Citizen” is nothing more than at best, politicians and those in their coterie allowing corrupt party politics, self-interest, and/or cowardice to blind their constitutional duty to protect and defend our country and Constitution, at worst, part of someone’s plot to attack and destroy the United States from within, or both. Given that any attack on the United States will most likely come from within, these latter two scenarios must be given serious consideration and ruled out only after sufficient evidence exists to so rule them out. Hence, the deliberate or reckless failing by those who are supposed to protect and defend our country and Constitution is tantamount to treason.
All members of Congress that have allowed and continue to allow the raping of our Constitution and the placing of our nation at risk to being attacked from within need to be removed from Congress, without any exceptions. As to what to do with those members of the media and others who have failed and continue to fail to do their job to adequately protect and defend our Constitutional Republic, that is a question for another day.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
185 Gatzmer Avenue
Jamesburg, New Jersey 08831
October 18, 2009