Before It's News | People Powered News

Monday, May 16, 2011


by Sharon Rondeau

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.

The Social Security Administration was created by an act of Congress in 1935 and employed 62,000 people as of 2007

(May 16, 2011) —Susan Daniels is a licensed private investigator who has researched the use of the social security number currently being used by Barack Hussein Obama which she has determined was issued in the state of Connecticut, where Obama has neither lived nor worked. Daniels has stated that the number had originally been assigned to a man from Connecticut born in 1890.

Daniels is president of Susan Daniels & Associates, which is located in Ohio and was incorporated in 1995. Prior to opening her own company, Daniels worked as a private investigator for Friedrick Investigations in Lakewood, OH, including in the areas of medical malpractice, background investigations, and litigation support. She was also employed as a “stringer” (correspondent) for the Cleveland Plain Dealer for 17 years, covering Board of Health meetings, trials, local county commissioners’ meetings, and performing public records research.

Author Jack Cashill has consulted with Susan Daniels on the issue of Obama’s social security number and has written a book, Deconstructing Obama, which presents Cashill’s evidence that Obama did not write his own autobiography, Dreams From My Father. Cashill believes that Bill Ayers, founder of the Weather Underground and acquaintance of Obama, actually wrote the book.

Ayers became a “Distinguished Professor of Education” at the University of Illinois but has been described as an “unrepentant domestic terrorist” who had bombed the Capitol building in 1971 and the Pentagon in 1972. Ayers and his later wife, Bernardine Dohrn, had built bombs which accidentally killed Ayers’s girlfriend at the time, Diana Oughton, in 1970. The Weather Underground had planned unsuccessfully to bomb Ft. Dix, a U.S. Army base in New Jersey and has been accused by one writer of treason.

Obama has been described as “comfortable” in the company of such former terrorists and radicals. Ayers and his wife still live in Hyde Park, where the Obamas lived before moving in to the White House in January 2009.

There is evidence that Ayers committed identity fraud, stealing birth certificate numbers from young children who had passed away. Ayers helped to launch the political career of Barack Hussein Obama in his home in Chicago in 1995 but in 2008 played down the relationship between Obama and himself. Obama and Ayers worked together on the board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which funneled millions of dollars to organizations designed to provide educational “reform.” The final report of the Challenge stated that despite the many millions spent on the project, “the Challenge had little impact on student outcomes” (page 14).

During her investigation of Obama’s use of the Connecticut social security number, Daniels also located two social security numbers associated with Michelle Obama, one of which Daniels stated does not belong to her.

On September 30, 2009, Daniels submitted a sworn affidavit of her findings for both of the Obamas which was assimilated into the Barnett v. Obama lawsuit. A second sworn affidavit was submitted on October 19, 2009. Following a dismissal by Judge David O. Carter on October 29, 2009, the case was recently granted a hearing on the merits by a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Upon request, C-Span and other major news media were allowed in the courtroom during the proceedings, which began on May 2, 2011.

In March 2011, Daniels wrote to the Social Security Administration and told them that Obama had been using a fraudulent social security number. Of the response she received, she said, “Usually if you get something back from the government, it will say, ‘You’re wrong because of Section such-and-such…’ They’ll cite something proving that you were wrong and why you were wrong. This one is a four-sentence letter, and it said, ‘After reviewing the information you provided, we disagree with your conclusion that a person’s social security number depends upon the address of residence.’ ‘We disagree!’ It’s hysterical, because they didn’t cite any reason why I wasn’t right. It’s not a question of opinion; it’s whether or not my contention was accurate.”

Letter sent by the Social Security Administration after Private Investigator Susan Daniels notified them of her finding that Obama is using a fraudulent SSN

Ms. Daniels has recently done a number of radio interviews and stated that there is more attention being focused on the matter of the social security number which Obama is using.

MRS. RONDEAU: When did you first start investigating Obama’s usage of the social security number?

MS. DANIELS: It was in August 2009. I had a client who asked that I investigate the number. When I started, I never expected to find anything. But I looked anyway. There are databases I can access that anyone else who wasn’t licensed or a member of law enforcement could not. They have really good information. I started looking at the bigger ones, and of course, nothing came up. But I found a smaller database – and there are so many out there that are available to investigators – and I put in “Barack Obama, Chicago, IL,” and up popped all these addresses with the social security number.

I was stunned. There were probably eight pages of them, and when it came up, it said, “issued in Connecticut,” and then the years 1977-79. With the help of some other people, I have now been able to pinpoint exactly when it was issued: it was March of 1977. The way I did that is that two different people had sent to me requests for social security numbers. I had found that the person who possessed the number right before Obama’s was dead, and once they’re dead, you can get the person’s information, because there is no longer any expectation of privacy. So his number ends in “25.” From Social Security, I have certified documents regarding numbers “24″ and “29.” Both of those were issued in March 1977, so I know unequivocally that if he had gotten it, that’s when it would have had to have been, and he would have had to have been living in Connecticut.

At that time, he was 15, because he wouldn’t have been 16 until August of that year, and he was presumably in Hawaii in high school. The minute I saw “Connecticut” – I’ve been licensed for 16 years now and know what I’m doing – I knew it was phony. I tell people, “If it had been California, it might have gotten my attention, but not much…” But when I saw “Connecticut,” I thought, “We have a big problem here.”

MRS. RONDEAU: It’s the farthest from Hawaii that it possibly could be, it seems.

MS. DANIELS: Yes, you can’t get any farther. What I was told is that he was being groomed to become the mayor of Chicago. Nobody ever dreamed that he’d end up as president. He started using this number in 1986, and that’s in addition to the phony Selective Service card he got. He has felonies galore. But the first time I see his use of it is 1986; that’s when it started, up to and including addresses when he was senator in DC. So he continuously used that number.

There are tons of other social security numbers attached to his name. Some were partial, some complete. But the trouble is, I and others could never document him with any of these other numbers.

MRS. RONDEAU: Where do people get the idea that there are 39 different numbers that he has used?

MS. DANIELS: They should stop asserting that, because it takes away from legitimate ones that I have found. When this is all done, I’ll tell you what my whole other theory is about him with all of these other social security numbers, and it’s a fraud, too. It’s a big scam. But regarding the one number, I knew it could not have been his.

When I first found the social security number, I put it through a database that verifies social security numbers, and it came up with his full name, middle name and everything, and said “Issued in Connecticut between 1977 and 1979.” It had his date of birth in both the foreign way, with the day, month and year, and also the way we do it, month-date-year.

Now what about the 1890 date? In 16 years, I had never seen anything like that, never, and I’ve looked at thousands of social security numbers. We know that he could not have gotten that number; he was nowhere near there. Despite the stories that people try to dream up, there is no way. I knew that Social Security did not come into effect until 1936, and it was voluntary. Lots of people never got social security numbers; my grandparents never had them. So what I figured out is that in 1977, somebody who was born in 1890 would at that point have been 87 years old. I figured they were probably sick, probably poor, and would have needed government help to get medical care. They would have had to have had a social security number, and that’s how I think that number plays into it.

Recently, I ran Obama’s addresses again, and they are still on the same database on which I found them originally. I noticed that with all these addresses is a phone number, and it occurred to me that it has to be a cell phone number because it’s at all the different addresses. It was obvious it wasn’t a land line. So I ran that, and it came up with 10-12 pages of addresses. Some of the pages had the Connecticut social security number; some don’t. However, they had the date of birth, 8/4/61, and one page jumped out, and in three places, one right after the other, for date of birth, it says “1890.”

MRS. RONDEAU: So does it appear that he took the social security number of a person who was deceased?

MS. DANIELS: Yes, that’s exactly what happened.

MRS. RONDEAU: Some researchers believe he got the birth certificate number of a child who was deceased.

MS. DANIELS: I absolutely believe that Obama stole a dead person’s social security number. I’ve spent a tremendous amount of time trying to figure out who might have had it first, but when they gave it to him, they would have removed that information. However, somewhere, there is a death certificate that has this social security number on it.

MRS. RONDEAU: Has anyone put in a FOIA request for the death certificate containing that number?

MS. DANIELS: Yes, Orly has tried repeatedly to get it, and they won’t give her anything. It won’t do any good, because the information won’t exist anymore at Social Security. They will have scrubbed it out, because Obama has had it for so long.

Jack Cashill wrote a story for WorldNetDaily not long ago; in fact, it was St. Patrick’s Day, about me, and in it, he said, “How do you think they got that number?” and I said, “His grandmother worked part-time at the Probate Court in Hawaii, and Bill Ayers used to brag about doing that kind of thing.” Well, Cashill went right to the Bill Ayers’s book and found a direct quote about how he was so good at coming up with new identities for people, and they always start with the social security number. I’ll send you the story, because Cashill has a direct quote out of Ayers’s book.

Editor’s Note: The following two paragraphs are the information which Ms. Daniels sent us quoted from Ayers’s Fugitive Dreams:

After the Baltimore fiasco, stealing ID was forbidden. Instead we began to build ID sets around documents as flimsy as a fishing license or a laminated card available in a Times Square novelty shop called “Official ID.” We soon figured out that the deepest and most foolproof ID had a government-issued Social Security card at its heart, and the best source of those were dead-baby birth certificates. I spent impious days over the next several months tramping through rural cemeteries in Iowa and Wisconsin, Illinois and North Dakota,searching for those sad little markers of people born between 1940 and 1950 who had died between 1945 and 1955. The numbers were surprising: two in one graveyard, a cluster of fourteen in another. Those poor souls had typically been issued birth certificates—available to us at any county courthouse for a couple of bucks and a simple form with information I could copy from the death announcement at the archive of the local paper—but they had never applied for a Social Security card.

Collecting those birth certificates became a small industry, and within a year we had over a hundred. For years I was a paper-made Joseph Brown, and then an Anthony Lee, remarkably durable identities. My on-paper official residences: a transient hotel in San Francisco and a warehouse in New York.


The Social Security Administration has even changed all of its documentation to say that the assignment of a number doesn’t necessarily depend on the state where you live. What they’re doing in June, and I know it’s a direct result of this Obama thing, is they’re going to start randomization, and that is going to be a nightmare for law enforcement.

MRS. RONDEAU: It reminds me of the same thing that the state of Hawaii did. They used to say that the short-form birth certificate wasn’t enough to determine if a person was of Hawaiian ancestry for the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands. In 2009, they changed their website to say that the short form was fine.

MS. DANIELS: And now they’re refusing to issue long-form birth certificates. I belong to a fabulous group of investigators, an international association. Most of the people in it are retired military, retired government workers; a lot of them have incredibly impressive credentials. Eighty countries around the world have members in it. I did a survey of the entire United States and the way each state handled the issuance of birth certificates. I probably got about 25 responses which told me exactly how the state worked it. Then I called the Department of Health in every other state and asked them, and there are only six states in the entire country which do not give out the long-form birth certificate. Hawaii is the most recent as a result of its recent announced internal decision.

Even people who live there, whose children were born there, can’t get them. Most people don’t really understand what’s going on here, what they’re hiding. The next-closest one to Hawaii was 2002 in Colorado, and the next-closest one 1994. This is not common to forbid someone from obtaining a long-form. What if a person simply wants to have it? It’s insane. For the longest time, Hawaii has been saying that Obama couldn’t get a copy of his, and I thought, “How stupid are we? ” In his position, he can do whatever he wants, and he is and does.

MRS. RONDEAU: You mentioned finding many addresses for Barack H. Obama. Do all of these residences belong to this Barack Obama, or could there be more than one?

MS. DANIELS: Oh, yes, because a lot of the cases have duplicate addresses on them, including law firm offices; the house in Chicago which he does not own, by the way. I don’t know if you read that story in WorldNetDaily or not.

MRS. RONDEAU: Yes, I did.

MS. DANIELS: Someone had contacted Jerry Corsi, and Jerry Corsi sent him to me. I helped him. He had a lot of information, and I went through different databases and verified it for him. He told me just recently that Obama has never had anything in his name. He and Michelle lived in a condo in Chicago, but I think it was hers originally. All of the addresses are legitimate for him. There was one in Massachusetts where he had all the parking tickets that didn’t get paid until 2007.

MRS. RONDEAU: Why would someone have that many addresses?

MS. DANIELS: That’s not unusual. What is unusual is if I run somebody’s social security number, a red flag will go up in my head if it shows up with, say, 20 different home addresses. This tells me that this is not a stable person. I could give you a whole profile on too many addresses. With him, they were all legitimate addresses. None of the other addresses for the other social security numbers came up. I tried to check those back and forth but couldn’t do anything with them.

Valerie Jarrett, also from Chicago, is in Washington now, and they were all friends. Daley is there, too. What a coincidence!

I knew I couldn’t get any additional information from the Social Security Administration. However, the letter I received from them is fabulous, because it says, “We got your request to look into this, and we don’t agree with you.” They support the fact that they received a request to look into it. I expected to get nothing.

I have a decent education; I have a Bachelor’s and a Master’s degree. I’m certified as a paralegal and have been since 1977. As I was sitting here I thought, “If I can find a lawsuit…” because I had heard that there were so many that had been filed against him, “maybe the attorney under discovery can request information about this social security number.” So I found Orly Taitz, and I called her. I said, “I have found a fraudulent social security number for him.” And she said, “I have that.” So I said, “OK, never mind.” But then Orly said, “I have the first five numbers,” and I answered, “I have the whole thing.” Then I filed an affidavit which had to be done within the next couple of days.

Editor’s Note: The Post & Email contacted Dr. Orly Taitz to inquire about whether or not the affidavits have been included in any of her lawsuits against Obama, and she answered, “Those affidavits are part of the case, which was presented to Judge Carter and later went to the 9th Circuit.”

People have tried to drag me into “Oh, you must be one of those birthers,” and I have said, “No, I understand what those people are doing. I’m not a party to that; I’ve never attached myself to the birth certificate issue.” When people ask me, “Well, where do you think he was born?” I say, “I have no idea, and I have no interest where he was born. My interest is the Connecticut social security number; that’s the only thing on which I focus.” To me, that’s the smart way to do it. There are a lot of other people to go after the other things. If people have called or asked me to do something, I have been more than happy to help them; I just don’t want my name associated with it because I stick with this one issue.

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

Friday, May 13, 2011

Oliver North: Releasing Raid Details Threatens US

Friday, 13 May 2011 05:42 AM

By Hiram Reisner

Lt. Col. Oliver North says releasing details of the raid that led to Osama bin Laden’s demise jeopardizes U.S. national security. The Obama administration needs to learn to keep its “mouths shut” and not gloat as part of the president’s “victory lap,” he said.

North also told Fox News’ Sean Hannity Thursday that the information gleaned shows “probably dozens of people fairly high up in their regime understood where he was.”

“The information about the intelligence treasure trove, and the discussions about the photographs, and all of the narrative that has come out from this administration, are seriously jeopardizing our efforts to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons and to make sure the Pakistanis don’t lose control of theirs,” North said. “These people in this administration have got to learn how to keep their mouths shut. Wouldn’t it be far better if the terrorists and al-Qaida . . . didn’t know what we know?”

North said he believed releasing the covert operation’s details was “necessary to the victory lap that Mr. Obama needed to take to prove that he was commander in chief of the world's most powerful military. “

“And all of this jeopardizes our goals, our national security and our ability to conduct these kinds of operations out in that part of the world in the future,” he said.

Hannity asked North what he thought of the information gathered from the numerous diaries and computers bin Laden kept in his walled Pakistani compound.

“Well, I glean from it that somebody in Pakistan — not just one but probably dozens of people fairly high up in their regime — understood where he was, what he was doing, and how he was doing it.” North said. “Those people need to be rooted out by the Pakistani government and literally locked up or sentenced to some kind of term where they cannot threaten their own government — because that’s what it was.

“Second of all, we've got to make our aid to Pakistan — military, economic, humanitarian, and intelligence — contingent upon them cooperating with us in this effort,” he said. “The Pakistani nukes get in the hands of the Islamists, or if Tehran gets the nuclear weapon that they are trying to build, we are in trouble particularly if we don't have the bases on either side of Iran.”

Read more on Oliver North: Releasing Raid Details Threatens US
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!
Research Summary on Hawaii Birth Certificate Number 151-1961-010641:


by Researcher

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.

Photo from the City of Honolulu website

(May 13, 2011) — Editor’s Note: The following report was compiled by the person who traveled to Hawaii last July and reported her findings to The Post & Email shortly thereafter.

According to the COLB posted on for Mr. Obama, his birth certificate number is 151-1961-010641. The number was allegedly assigned when his birth certificate was allegedly filed with the State Registrar on August 8, 1961. The Nordyke twins, whose original long-form birth certificates were posted on the internet, are identified as file numbers 151-1961-010637 and 151-1961-010638 respectively, and were assigned and accepted by the State Registrar on August 11, 1961. I am in possession of an email dated February 3, 2010 in which Ms. Okubo stated that the certificate numbers were assigned by the State Registrar and only in the main DoH office located on Oahu (Honolulu).
Based on this information, it is not possible that 151-1961-010641 was assigned three days earlier than were 151-1961-010637 and 151-1961-010638. The file number 010641 was likely assigned on Friday, August 11, 1961 and no later than Monday, August 14, 1961.
A small group of researchers that I work with identified an infant girl named Virginia Sunahara, born on August 4, 1961 at Wahiawa Hospital in Wahiawa, Oahu, HI. Due to complications, she was transferred to and later died at Kapiolani Women and Children’s Medical Center (most likely) on August 5, 1961. This happens to coincide with date of birth and birthplace of the Nordyke twins. Assuming that her medical records were also transferred to Kapiolani, the birth certificate likely originated at Kapiolani and was included in the group of birth certificates that contained the Nordyke twins.

a. Born the morning of August 4, 1961 at Wahiawa Hospital, Wahiawa, Oahu, HI.

b. Due to complications, the infant was transferred to hospital in Honolulu. Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children is the most likely; however, Queens Medical Center is also a possibility.

c. Died at Kapiolani the morning of August 5, 1961.

d. Death notice appears in the Honolulu Star Advertiser on August 8, 1961 and the Honolulu Star-Bulletin on August 14, 1961 for Tomiyo Sunahara; no birth announcement was published.

e. Interred at National Cemetery of the Pacific, aka Punchbowl in Sept. 1961.

f. One researcher requested verification from the Veterans Administration that Virginia Sunahara was interred in plot U-966F (Sunahara listed as buried here. See: and was informed that there were no records responsive to her request. The gravesite in question was allegedly occupied by James T. Sawamura. I visited Punchbowl on July 21, 2010 to confirm. I went into the office to obtain information about plot number U-966-F. Virginia Sunahara was not listed in the database; the clerk showed me the computer screen. The database indicates that James T. Sawamura is buried there. Born Jul 23 1926; Died Oct 14 1980.

g. The same researcher made a UIPA request from the DoH for an abbreviated, non-certified copy of the Sunahara COLB per the DoH Public Health Regulation Chapter 8B and was informed “no records exist that were responsive to her request,” which is the UIPA equivalent response that this person did or does not exist, according to the DoH. The correct response based on previous requests for other abbreviated, non-certified copies of the COLB, is “denied per HRS 338-18” since the requester “does not have a direct and tangible interest.” PHR Chapter 8B does however allow the release of such information but the DoH thus far refuses to comply.

h. I personally visited the DOH Office in Honolulu on July 21, 2010 and found Virginia Sunahara’s name in both the birth and death indexes spanning 1960-1964.

i. The research team did some footwork and determined the following: The father, Tomio Sunahara, was cremated and interred at the Mililani Memorial Gardens. Born Oct 13 1924; Died Mar 26 1968.

j. I visited the Sunahara birth address of xxxxxxxxxxxxxx. The house was in a relatively poor area, the house was unkempt and was not much more than a shack; there were discarded items and lawn bags full of pop and beer cans scattered everywhere. I approached the door where I could hear Fox News blaring in the background and knocked. A 50ish man in a pair of swim trunks, no shirt, answered the door. From what I could see, the house was extremely unkempt and had not been cleaned in years. There was stuff piled everywhere. The man at the door was Virginia’s brother, xxxxxxx.

k. I asked if xxxxxx, Virginia’s mother was home, and he asked me what the purpose of my visit was. I explained that I was researching infant deaths in 1961 and that I had attempted to visit Virginia’s gravesite at the National Cemetery but I could not locate it. He confirmed his father Tomio was buried at Mililani (which is no more than 5 miles from Wahiawa) and that Virginia was buried with him. I asked again if I could speak with the mother and he took me to a room located behind the carport and knocked on the door. The mother was asleep but awoke and came to the door. The condition of her room was the same as the inside of the house. He left me with the mother and returned to the house. I explained again that I was researching infant deaths and wanted some details regarding the death of Virginia. This is what I got:

i. Tomiyo/Virginia Sunahara was born the morning of Aug 4 1961 at Wahiawa General Hospital.

ii. She was having difficulty breathing and they transferred her to a hospital in Honolulu. Mrs. Sunahara did not remember which one but I assume it was Kapiolani since it is was more likely equipped to handle neonatal complications. She also could not recall where she was taken or who the physician was. You have to keep in mind that she is 83 years old, and this event occurred 50 years ago.

iii. Virginia survived less than a day which likely places the time of death sometime in the early AM of Aug 5 1961.

iv. I asked I could see the birth/death documentation and she said she could not remember if she even had it. Even if she did, given the condition of the house, I seriously doubt that she would have been able locate it.

v. I expressed my condolences to the mother regarding her loss, thanked her for the information and then left.

l. I called a member of the research team and asked them to find out where Mililani Gardens were located. After I left Wahiawa to head back toward Honolulu, I saw an exit for Mililani and exited. I stopped at the public library and obtained driving directions.

m. In the meantime, the research team member contacted the mortuary and confirmed that Virginia was indeed buried there with her father, Tomio as was her brother Stephen who passed away in 2002. According to mortuary, Virginia’s remains were dug up at the National Cemetery October 1968 and placed with her father’s, Tomio Sunahara.

I drove to the cemetery and stopped at the first office I came to and obtained the plot location. I explained that I was researching infant deaths from 1961 and asked if it was possible to view Virginia’s birth and death documentation (which was likely transferred to the mortuary when her remains were transferred). I was informed that I could not see the documentation due to legal and privacy concerns.
I located the gravesite. Again, by all appearances, this has been here for quite some time. There is zero evidence that this grave marker is a recent addition.
During my visit to the DoH office in Honolulu on July 20, 2010. I examined and made images of various index books:

a. The 1955-1959 birth index

b. The 1960-1964 birth index

c. The 1960-1964 death index

d. The 1960-1965 marriage index by Groom

e. The 1966-1970 marriage index by Groom

f. The 1960-1965 marriage index by Bride

All of the index books with the exception of the 1960-1964 birth index included the date range in the header on each page. My analysis is that there is a canned report the Vital Records department can run for the various indexes based on a specified date range and it is one of the parameters included when the report is printed. The fact that the 1960-1964 index lacks the date range in the header is a good indication that a custom report was generated to include Mr. Obama. His name was either somehow inserted or a report was created to include all births registered between the years of 1960-1964 and Mr. Obama. I have no doubt that the DoH has some sort of birth registration for Mr. Obama; however, his birth was likely registered sometime after 1964 or it is either a late/delayed or foreign birth registration.
During my visit I spoke with “Jesse the Vital Records Supervisor” and asked him if the birth indexes included foreign/out-of-state births, Hawaiian Births, and Late/Delayed Registration Births and I was informed no, that they included only the births that met the general birth criteria. I asked to see the aforementioned and I was told they did not exist or were not available. This is in direct conflict with the DoH Specific Records Retention Schedule items VDR-10, VDR-6, VDR-1. The Post & Email was able to obtain pages from the Certificate of Hawaiian Birth Index from Ms. Okubo, so its existence has already been confirmed. I asked if I could obtain a copy of a specific person’s index data and I was informed no, that it would contain too much information. I asked if I could obtain a redacted copy that included only information that appears in the index books (vital event, name and gender), and again, I was informed no.


The VA cemetery records were most likely computerized sometime in the late 1970’s or early 1980’s. Virginia’s data was erroneously entered into the database at that point and time.
According a fellow researcher, an audit of the burial records was to have been performed around 2003. Either Punchbowl cemetery neglected to perform the audit, or it at least failed to verify Virginia’s records. In or after 2006, Virginia’s burial record was removed from the VA database.
None of the databases that have been offered as evidence e.g. Find A Grave, Burial Internment, are the actual VA database. They are just a snapshot of what the VA had on record at a particular point and time. It is not clear how long it takes for these auxiliary databases to self-correct or if they ever do.
Also, I believe that there was no official name change from Tomiyo to Virginia. According HRS 338, death certificates must be received by the DoH within three days. The Sunaharas probably had not selected a name for the baby prior to her death. The timeframe for submittal for a birth certificate is not as stringent (seven days). By the time the birth certificate was submitted, they decided on the name Virginia and the DoH updated its records accordingly for the death certificate. It is rare the issuance of a death certificate precedes a birth registration so the DoH likely retroactively updated its death record in regard to the first name.
If Virginia’s certificate number is 151-1961-010641, it was likely processed at the DoH on the 11th and no later than the 14th, based on the Nordyke twins’ certificate numbers (010637 and 010638) and the date they were processed, which was the 11th. We know that the DoH assigns a numerically sequential certificate number when it is received and accepted/filed. In other words, it is not pre-printed on a form that is distributed to all the HI hospitals. It is only way it can control the sequential numbering of the births otherwise the certificate numbers would be all over the place.
The delay of the internment at the National Cemetery that is assumed to have occurred on Sept 28, 1961 (based on the VA database snapshots in 2006) most likely had to with how long it took the Sunaharas to obtain approval from the VA to bury Virginia’s remains there. She was either embalmed, then held in cold storage at the mortuary that handled the remains, or she was cremated and the Sunaharas held her remains until such time that she could be interned at the National Cemetery. The latter makes the most sense, and cremation is a common method of handling remains in Asian culture.

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
Update: Even High School Students Declare Obama’s Birth Certificate a Forgery!


by Sharon Rondeau

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.

Photoshop is made by Adobe Systems and is used to manipulate images, text and backgrounds in "layers"

(May 12, 2011) —[Editor's Note: The report which forms the basis for this article contains profanity not normally utilized as source material by The Post & Email in keeping with our stated policies. However, due to the significance of the findings outlined in the report and the ramifications, The Post & Email deemed it acceptable in this case.]

The San Diego Reader is reporting that several students attending a school named High Tech High has declared the long-form birth certificate image released by the White House on April 27 “a Photoshop job, and not even a particularly careful one.”

The school which the students attended had been expecting Obama to speak at its commencement, according to the report. After analyzing the image, however, the chairperson of the commencement event stated, “now we have to disinvite America’s first black president and maybe get him kicked out of office, too.” The student then suggested that Donald Trump “fill in.” The chairperson’s position result from what he described as “Our commitment to ethics really sets us apart at High Tech High.”

The students who declared Obama’s document a forgery likened the situation to that of former CBS anchor Dan Rather during the 2004 presidential election campaign, when “the fallout was enough to take down Rather, and the whole mess probably helped Bush win in ’04.” Forged documents were at the heart of the “Killian controversy” which ended Rather’s 43-year career at CBS.

One of the technical students stated that after confirming the image a forgery, they “did a little followup work” and found a child born in “the same hospital” on with a death certificate dated August 5, 1961. As the student described it, the date of birth of the child, Herbert Harrison O’Brien, was given as August 4, 1961 on the death certificate, but there was no birth certificate bearing his name. Obama’s purported birth date at Kapiolani Medical Center was August 4, 1961.

There has been speculation that the birth certificate of a deceased person was used to manufacture any documentation Obama might produce.

One television station’s website has already removed its coverage of the release of Obama’s purported long-form birth certificate.

According to Obama, he always had a copy, or the original, of his birth certificate, but he refused to release it to the public until April 27, 2011. In June 2008, an image appeared at The Daily KOS purported to be Obama’s “birth certificate,” but the April release proved that the earlier image had been a short-form “Certification” which did not contain all the details of the birth such as the name of the hospital, the doctor who delivered him, the height, weight, and official registrar’s stamp.

Other websites such as and Politifact insisted that the 2008 short-form image was Obama’s official Hawaii birth certificate even though a completed request form from Obama was never located. Politifact published the “long-form” which the White House put out on April 27, as did The Daily KOS, stating that Obama’s release of it to the public was “nothing short of brilliant.”

Politifact has periodically insisted that the controversy about Obama’s birth in Hawaii is over while continuing to post updates on the ongoing questions. The website was a Pulitzer prize winner in 2009. The writer of the Politifact articles, Amy Hollyfield, has been identified by Dr. Ron Polland as an operative working to disseminate the Obama 2008 Certification of Live Birth to The Daily KOS, Politifact, and the Obama campaign to be passed off as an authentic document.

Is Amy Hollyfield guilty of manufacturing, distributing or misrepresenting a forged document to the American people with the intent to defraud and deceive? And what about her employer, the St. Petersburg Times?

What will these organizations say now that it appears that the birth certificate of a child born on August 4, 1961 at Kapiolani Medical Center was used to create a birth record for Obama to attempt to prove that he was born in the United States so that he could continue his ruse of eligibility to occupy the White House? Are they guilty of forgery themselves? Did they invent the narrative which accompanied their reports to the public which insisted that Obama had been “Born in the U.S.A.?”

What did they know, and when did they know it?

Was there a conspiracy among the media, the Hawaii Department of Health, Hawaii elected officials, Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the lower courts to propel an ineligible, foreign-born domestic enemy into the office of president? Why did it happen? Was it intended to erode America’s sovereignty and standing in the world through foreign influence? Was it to carry out the plans of the New World Order to create a one-world government, aided by a foreigner with no allegiance to the United States?

If Obama has lied in order to ascend to the presidency illegitimately, what will happen now? Will all of the executive orders, bills he has signed, and appointments he has made be declared null and void?

What about Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, who will be returning to his home and family on Saturday, May 14, after spending five months in Ft. Leavenworth for refusing to obey orders because he questioned Obama’s legitimacy? What if Lakin was right?

Does the U.S. Congress have the same “commitment to ethics” which characterizes the students at High Tech High? When will the hearings begin? When will Obama and all of his criminal conspirators face justice for what they have done to the American people?

On January 12, 2010, Mr. John Charlton, The Post & Email’s founder, predicted that an Orange Revolution would “break out in the United States by July 2011 seeking the ousting of Barack Hussein Obama from power and sweeping his Democrat supporters in the federal government into prison.”

What did Mr. Charlton know, and how did he know it?


Update, May 13, 2011: From reader Neil Turner:

RE: High Tech High of San Diego discovers that Obama is a fraud.

This is the High School that wanted to interview those ‘racist Minutemen’ several years ago; I met two ‘reporter-esses’ at Bobby’s Restaurant for an interview to inform them that was not what we were about – it was about upholding the laws and the sovereignty of our Nation. If I remember correctly, they were a very liberal institution, but their report was as fair and balanced as one could expect from the brainwashed liberals among us.

What poetic justice it would be if they do make a major contribution to exposing the Fraud of the Centuries, AND subsequently disinvite the usurper as their commencement speaker in June, 2011 (to be replaced by Donald Trump!?!?).

It would deprive us of a great opportunity for a major sign-waving IMPEACH the IMPOSTER protest, but if it speeds up the removal of the Illegal Alien from our White House, then so be it.

Poetic justice indeed.


The website for High Tech High School in San Diego is here.

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011


by Joan Swirsky, ©2011

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.

Can Donald Trump's probing overcome Obama's use of Rules for Radicals?

(May 10, 2011) — That about sums up what has happened over the past month or so, as Trump decided to ask the simple question legions of people have been asking and legions of lawyers have been waging lawsuits about for the past almost-three years: Where’s the birth certificate?

Instantly the craven media and assorted Hollywood types who have been effectively conspiring with Team Obama to keep all aspects of his life hidden from public view mobilized to quash Trump, as usual choosing Rule #12 from the Chicago Marxist Saul Alinsky’s famous book, Rules for Radicals: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” In essence, go after your enemy personally and not his business because people are more vulnerable and hurt faster than institutions.

But whoever was responsible for the vast media blackout on the birth-certificate subject never counted on a person like Trump, who is immune to intimidation or threats. In short, they were messing with the wrong person.

Here is but a small sample of how “in the bag” the media were – even before Obama tried to come clean:

Lisa Myers from NBC-TV, introduced here by another Obama apologist David Gregory.
Candy Crowley from CNN-TV:
George Stephanopoulos from ABC-TV.
“The View” from NBC-TV.
Suzanne Malveaux from CNN-TV
Jerry Seinfeld took on Trump and Trump swatted him away like a gnat.
Robert DeNiro took on Trump and Trump swatted him away like a gnat.
Bill Cosby took on Trump and Trump swatted him away like a gnat.
Karl Rove took on Trump: Swat!
David Letterman took on Trump: Swat!
Lawrence O’Donnell took on Trump: Swat!

Those buzzing gnats – most of them surrogates for Obama – were easy-to-dismiss distractions to the mogul Trump. And when Trump followed up the birth-certificate subject by asking the exquisitely logical question that every parent with a teenager applying to college wonders – how could a not-too-bright student with so-so grades get into not one but two Ivy League schools – leftists became apoplectic, invoking, ala newsman Bob Schieffer, the main weapon they carry in their arsenal of projected character flaws: Racism!

On and on went the Obama apologists and name-callers until Obama’s team put their collective fingers in the air and realized that Trump was winning hearts and minds and they were losing. What to do? Okay, they grudgingly agreed, we’ll release the damned so-called long-form birth certificate and shut this guy up.

On Saturday, April 16, at the precise moment that Trump was giving a televised speech to a huge Tea Party crowd in Boca Raton, FL, guess who broke into that broadcast to announce his intention to release the real true authentic irrefutable can’t-be-argued-with version of his birth certificate on the Internet?

Clearly the Obama team had decided to abandon the first hoax of a birth and to release the colossal hoax and amateurish forgery of a second version, which has now been examined by forensic document examiners, critical thinkers, and those who prefer empiricism over hype. You can find some of their analyses here and here and here and here and here and here and from a leftist site here and from a graphic artist here and from Dr. Ron Polland here.
Why Release an Obvious Fake? blogger Dr. Kate asked her readers. “Why would [his handlers] expose Obama to such an obviously sloppy job of a faked document unless they wanted him and his network to go down? [Is this] clearing the way for [Hillary] Clinton?”

On the Andrea Shea King Radio Show on May 3, Charles Kerchner – a retired naval officer and the lead plaintiff (one of four) in a suit about the eligibility issue that was dismissed by the Supreme Court (read about it here) – said that the “new” Obama birth certificate is “an obvious forgery” and that it was shocking that “a forgery would emanate from a White House server.”

Kerchner’s lawyer, Mario Apuzzo, puts the entire issue in plain English: “It has never been about the birth certificate…it is about the Constitution, and the fact that under the Constitution, Obama is not a natural born citizen. He cannot be, because his father was Kenyan and a British subject.”

The U.S. Constitution requires that both parents be natural-born Americans. And the reason is clear: Anyone whose parents are not born in America raises the very real specter of divided loyalties. And we’ve already seen that from Obama, with his peculiar involvement in the rigged presidential election in 2007 of the Marxist Raila Odinga in Kenya, whose campaign he contributed to and who he campaigned for. And since the Acorn-driven election of 2008 Obama has trotted around the globe embracing other Marxists like Manuel Zelaya in Honduras and Hugo Chavez in Venezuela and Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua. This is why dual loyalty is so dangerous.

Erick Erickson of even joked about it: “As a friend noted on Facebook, Obama’s popularity is falling so fast that Kenyans are now claiming Obama was born in the United States!”

Trump was also skeptical about the second version of the birth certificate, which further fueled his popularity but seemed to plunge Obama’s ratings more deeply into the abyss – although other things contributed to those downwardly-plunging Rasmussen graphs, for instance a disastrous economy, increasing national debt, continuing high joblessness with unemployment applications that hit an eight-month high this month, escalating inflation, skyrocketing gas prices, and, in my opinion, the seditious White House/DOJ act in April of granting American citizenship to three people convicted of terrorist-related crimes.

Trump has succeeded by embodying the bedrock values that our Founders embraced:

Nose-to-the-grindstone hard work
Unstinting resilience in the face of failure
Irrepressible confidence in a better tomorrow
Bold initiatives in all pursuits
Fearlessness borne of a DNA American spirit
Embrace of free-market capitalism
An unwavering love for America
A steadfast belief in God

Can even one of these attributes describe Mr. Obama? I rest my case.

Whether it’s in mega-business deals, international beauty contests, rescuing iconic Manhattan landmarks like the Wollman skating rink, spearheading and hosting the competitive “Apprentice” and “Celebrity Apprentice” TV shows with wild success for over a decade, or philanthropic pursuits, Trump has demonstrated not only an entertaining grandiosity but also a reputation for getting things done and also a bluntness that is virtually absent from today’s debate on any subject, thanks to the contamination in our society of the leftist dogmas of political correctness and multiculturalism.

Political correctness has made once-outspoken conservative politicians tiptoe like sugarplum fairies through every serious issue. And multiculturalism – displaying the Left’s perverse egalitarianism – has dictated that everyone and everything is “equal,” contrasting, for instance, a country like Israel that makes deserts bloom, creates symphony orchestras, builds cutting-edge medical institutions, and leads the world in technology and Nobel prizes, with the “Palestinian” Authority, which gives hefty cash rewards to parents who strap suicide bombs on their three-year olds.

Clearly, Trump doesn’t subscribe to this leftist hogwash, which would ordinarily make him a welcomed contender with Republican shakers and movers. But since Trump dared to question Obama’s eligibility and to demand that he produce the infamously missing birth certificate – a subject the cowardly elites on both sides of the aisle have avoided like the plague for over two years – he has become the target of their hysterical wrath.

Haven’t you wondered why all 435 members of the U.S. Congress and all 100 members of the U.S. Senate have avoided this subject like it was the Ebola virus, and why the Supreme Court has rejected over a dozen lawsuits on this issue from seasoned attorneys deeply versed in Constitutional law?

My theory is that someone, or many someones, “reached” them. The other day, a friend of mine who owns a small business and owes money to several of his vendors got a call from a functionary of one firm who told him: “I’m on the Internet and I can tell you that I know what kind of underwear your grandchildren wear, so I expect a check from you.” And that was from a low-level employee of a relatively small firm for a relatively small amount of money.

Can you imagine the “reminders” that politicians and court justices (including on the Supreme Court) have received over the past three years about the hottest “don’t go there” issue regarding a “president” in U.S. history?

And that’s not to omit conservatives who have been too faint-hearted and sissified to ask not only about the birth certificate but about other vital information, for instance the missing medical records, the multiple Social Security cards (which president Carol Taber writes revealingly about here), the questionable visa(s), the Selective Service records, why both Obamas gave up their law licenses, on and on. And look how they cower or resort to the typical liberal tactic of insulting the messenger, or in Trump’s case, the questioner.

This is because, bottom line, he scares the hell out of them!

Just like Terry Lakin scared the hell out of Obama, and look at the horrific price he has paid! While the Obama regime launched Campaign 2012, with its obscene goal of raising a billion dollars while America is going broke – look here for Pamela Geller’s listing of the foreign contributions and finance fraud of his last campaign – LTC Lakin, who is a decorated U.S. Army flight surgeon, was still languishing in Leavenworth prison, deprived of his pay and benefits and destined to be dismissed from the military merely for questioning Obama’s eligibility to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief. Here is a direct quote from LTC Lakin: “The Constitution matters. The truth matters.” (FYI:


While Trump was asking questions and swatting critics, his momentum was gaining. So much so that Obama seemed to be developing an unhealthy obsession with the man. Or, as he would snarkily call Trump, the “carnival barker.” So obsessed, in fact, that the goons who do his bidding at the company he has a hefty share in, Facebook, are now trying to convince Indianapolis 500 officials to dump him as their pace car driver in the this month’s race, while others are trying to boycott the advertisers on his TV show.

On April 30th at the White House Correspondents Dinner, Obama directed scathing comments at Trump. According to Don Fredrick, at his Obama Timeline site, “Obama takes perverted pleasure in criticizing and mocking people who have no ability to retaliate” – which he did to both Hillary Clinton and John McCain during the presidential campaign, to the Supreme Court Justices during the January 2010 State of the Union address, and to Cong. Paul Ryan during the April 13 budget-deficit speech.”

As Mychal Massie, chairman of the National Leadership Network of Black Conservatives, notes approvingly, “Trump is doing what you do to bullies. You get in their faces and tell them it’s time for a gut check – and in the case of Obama, nothing would please me more than seeing him and his sneapish smirk sent packing back to Chicago.”

Quite possible, actually, when you consider that quickly on the heels of the birth-certificate brouhaha came three threats that Team Obama wanted to make disappear.

The first was described by Pamela Geller, author with Robert Spencer of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America, in an article entitled “An illegitimate child, an illegitimate president.” Geller claims “that Barack Hussein Obama Sr.’s immigration file was the impetus for President Obama to release his “long form” birth certificate last week. If he thought that release would put the matter to rest, it has had the opposite effect. It has all raised more questions than it answered, [including] shocking revelations…”

The second took place on May 2nd in Pasadena, CA, and involved arguments in the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals by lawyer Orly Taitz and Gary Kreep of the U.S. Justice Foundation, who were granted a chance to challenge the dismissal of their separate cases by a Santa Ana federal judge two years ago – those cases being that the “president” was not a natural-born American and should be removed from office. Taitz told the court that the Obama administration had pressured the legal system to hide the truth.

The greatest and most immediate threat, however, is a book due out May 17th by Jerome Corsi, the same man who co-wrote the book, Unfit for Command – Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry, which completely and deservedly derailed Sen. Kerry’s run for the presidency.

But this time Dr. Corsi has writtenWhere’s the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President, which has already shot to #1 on several prominent bestseller lists.

Uh oh.

I can see it all now, a light bulb suggestion by an Obama advisor that they use the info Gateway Pundit says they’ve known about since last August, specifically that Osama bin Laden has been living in a so-called mansion in Pakistan, not far from a military base, for the past five years.

Aha! What a perfect time for a WE INTERRUPT THIS PROGRAM announcement! But they didn’t make the announcement last August when they ostensibly got the news, and not in any of the months that followed, and not last week or on Saturday or on Sunday morning or afternoon. Instead Obama picked Sunday night, just in time to cut in on guess whose hit television show? Can’t make this up! (Is this called stalking?)

And, of course, perfect time to orchestrate several things at one time:

1. A total eclipse of any significant coverage of the above-mentioned issues.

2. Blanket coverage of dozens of “spontaneous” gatherings in New York and D.C. (it’s just about the middle of the night, remember), where people showed up an hour before the Big Announcement waving flags and chanting pro-USA and anti-Osama mantras. Reminds me of those equally spontaneous uprisings in the Middle East, where brand new placards and perfectly-constructed tent cities magically appear overnight.

3. The appearance of Obama-approved-experts touting the mission virtually around the clock to all media outlets.

But here is an analysis by Paul Craig Roberts who describes how warped and inaccurate the media were in informing the American public about what was really happening: “The US government’s bin Laden story was so poorly crafted that it did not last 48 hours before being fundamentally altered.”

At this point we have no body, no DNA reports, no photographs, and no confirmation on audiotape or videotape that bin Laden’s daughter witnessed her father’s death. All we have are the conflicting reports of a regime that has become famous for its egregious lack of transparency and bald-faced lies, lies that are chillingly documented in Jack Cashill’s can’t-put-down book, Deconstructing Obama.

Joyce Romano, who always hits a Bullseye, sums it up best with this piece from “Usually when governments use misinformation, they use it to make themselves look good. The Obama Administration gets points for originality, insofar as it’s been using disinformation and misinformation to make itself look arbitrary, unlawful, helpless and stupid. Here is a great summary.

And here is the latest from the John Batchelor radio show. His guest, Larry Johnson of No Quarter, said Bin Laden was killed in Pakistan but his body was not taken onboard the USS Carl Vincent and dumped into the sea. Rather he was flown to Bagram AFB in Afghanistan for DNA testing and then his body was dumped from a plane somewhere over the Hindu Kush mountain range that stretches between central Afghanistan and northern Pakistan.

No wonder The Washington Times said that Team Obama “is in lockdown” on the particulars of their disposal of the most hated man in the civilized world….Sending in a SEAL team to blow off bin Laden’s head showed presidential leadership. The subsequent handling of the body and burial, however, raises serious questions about Mr. Obama’s dominant priority.” Especially when the esteemed Andrew Bostom writes that an article in The Washington Times by Anneke Green reports that the elaborate burial ceremony for bin Laden included prayers that cursed both Christians and Jews.


In the aftermath of the heroic take-down of bin Laden by the U.S. Navy’s Seal Team Six, all praise was deservedly showered on America’s venerated military heroes. But the same cannot be said for Mr. Obama.

On, a piece called On Bin Laden’s Death noted: “We arrived at 9/11 because President Clinton refused to do as much. Even so, one can’t help but notice that Obama’s statement on the death of bin Laden completely ignores the debt owed to the Bush Administration while at the same time taking a couple of oblique swipes.”

In that regard, the title of a Washington Times editorial says it all: “No Class: Obama snubs Bush, praises himself.” Or as radio host and writer Kevin McCullough titled a recent article: “Obama’s Win, Bush’s Credit.”

Interesting, isn’t it, that a new poll at Newsmax/InsiderAdvantage shows a mild boost in support for Obama but resounding credit to President Bush for the al Qaeda leader’s capture.

Congressman Peter King also weighed in, saying that the intelligence that led to bin Laden’s take-down was the result of waterboarding instituted during the Bush years, a method which Obama and the leftists who surround him vigorously protested.

And just to think it was Obama himself who said the following while running for the presidency in October of 2007: “I have been consistent in my strong belief that no Administration should allow the use of torture, including so-called ‘enhanced interrogation techniques’ like water-boarding, head-slapping, and extreme temperatures. It’s time that we had a Department of Justice that upholds the rule of law and American values, instead of finding ways to enable the President to subvert them.”

In announcing the attack to the nation, at the bizarrely-timed-near-midnight hour, Obama went out of his way to say: “We must also reaffirm that the United States is not – and never will be – at war with Islam…bin Laden was not a Muslim leader; he was a mass murderer of Muslims.”

That was a stunning surprise to Pamela Geller, who wrote on her website the following refutation:

“Pure nonsense. Whether we like it or not, Osama bin Laden was a Muslim leader…he was a beloved figure to millions in the Muslim world because of his devotion and purity to the Islamic jihad. And if he wasn’t a Muslim leader, why was he buried within 24 hours of his death `in keeping with Islamic tradition’? We washed and cleaned this monster? Outrageous…If bin Laden was not a Muslim leader, but was instead a `mass murderer of Muslims,’ why was the government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan protecting him?”

Come to think of it, what is it about Obama and dumping people’s remains in the ocean? On October 24, 2008, 11 days before the election, Obama arrived alone on a night flight to Honolulu, where his “typical white person” maternal grandmother was reported by the Obamamedia to be gravely ill, but not quite ill enough for Michelle and the granddaughters to make the trip. What was going through Obama’s mind? How could he possibly know that his ‘beloved’ grandmother would die the day before the election? What secrets about Obama’s ‘father’ did she take with her to her grave? Madalyn Dunham died ‘suddenly’ of previously-unannounced `terminal cancer’ while convalescing from a broken hip in her bungalow one day before the U.S. general election in Nov. 2008. Her remains were cremated – against her written wishes – within 12 hours after death. Mmmmm….does anyone else but me smell a rat?

As to bin Laden and his alleged burial at sea, Obama shows once again that he doesn’t have the backbone of a Trump. Obama said “no” to making the photographs public since our enemies might not like us. Puleeeze! Here are some photographs taken by a Pakistani security official who entered the compound after the early morning raid on Monday. If they inflame our enemies, so be it. And if they attack us again, a Trump, like former President George W. Bush, would let it be known that Mecca and Medina would be the next targets our SEALs would, ahem, address.

While most people, at least so far, either believe or want to believe the Obama regime’s narrative about bin Laden’s demise, there are people like Gonzalo Lira (“Sorry, I Don’t Believe This”) and Gordon Duff (“U.S. Openly Accepts bin Laden Long Dead”) and Dr. Paul Craig Roberts (“Osama bin Laden’s Second Death”) who make pretty persuasive cases that the entire operation was simply a Wag the Dog effort to boost Obama’s sagging poll numbers. In fact, Political Tiger spells out the pressure Trump used to force Obama into a classic Wag the Dog scenario.
Even if Obama hoped that his May 5th visit to Ground Zero in NY City would boost his poll numbers, he would have to contend with critics who have never forgotten or forgiven the fact that he blew off Ground Zero Memorial Services in 2009 and 2010.

And that is not to omit the cruel slap he dealt to Debra Burlingame, the sister of Charles “Chic” Burlingame (pilot of the plane that crashed into the Pentagon) when she questioned Obama about Attorney General Eric Holder’s plan to prosecute the men who interrogated Khalid Sheik Mohammed, from whom they obtained the information crucial to finding bin Laden. “As a former attorney,” she said, “I know you can’t tell the Attorney General what to do, [and] he said, ‘No, I can’t.’ But I said ‘… that shouldn’t stop you from giving your opinion. We wouldn’t be here today if they hadn’t done their jobs. Can’t you at least give them your opinion?’ And he said, ‘no I won’t,’ and he turned around and walked away.”


But all the above pales in comparison with a potentially immense scandal that could make Watergate look like a minor prank.

According to a Washington, D.C. Insider (as reported by Ulsterman), who has been leaking explosive information about the inner workings of the White House for some time, the “president” was so completely incapable of making the decision to take down bin Laden that senior military and intelligence officials ultimately took control and made the decision to take out the terrorist.

Part of this jaw-dropping report states that there was a significant push to take out bin Laden months ago, but the senior White House staff resisted, which severely strained the relationship between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Obama’s alter-ego and closest advisor – some think she’s the de facto president– Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett. [Read more about Jarrett from the Washington Insider here ].

The decision was finally made for Obama not by Obama by the Navy Seals. With 48 hours until the order was issued, the Chain of Command was told to the Administration, not requested. The Administration scrambled to abort the mission, but that order was overruled.

Photo taken in “War Room” of Administration figures watching the mission being executed. Obama still wearing his golf clothes.

Here is the detailed report from the Washington Insider: It begins by saying: “What Valerie Jarrett and the president did not know is that Leon Panetta had already initiated a program that reported to him – and only him – involving a covert on-the-ground attack against the compound.”

Q: You stated that President Obama was “overruled” by military/intelligence officials regarding the decision to send in military specialists into the Osama Bin Laden compound. Was that accurate?

A: I was told – in these exact terms, “we overruled him” (Obama). I have since followed up and received further details on exactly what that meant, as well as the specifics of how Leon Panetta worked around the president’s “persistent hesitation to act.” There appears NOT to have been an outright overruling of any specific position by President Obama, simply because there was no specific position from the president to do so. President Obama was, in this case, as in all others, working as an absentee president….There had been a push to invade the compound for several weeks if not months, primarily led by Leon Panetta, Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates, David Petraeus, and Jim Clapper. The primary opposition to this plan originated from Valerie Jarrett, and it was her opposition that was enough to create uncertainty within President Obama.

Q: What changed the president’s position and enabled the attack against Osama Bin Laden to proceed?

A: Nothing changed with the president’s opinion – he continued to avoid having one. Every time military and intelligence officials appeared to make progress in forming a position, Jarrett would intervene and the stalling would begin again…A brief meeting was held at this time with other officials, including Secretary Gates and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but Gates, like Panetta, was unable to push the president to act. It was at this time that Gates indicated to certain Pentagon officials that he may resign earlier than originally indicated – he was that frustrated. Both Panetta and Clinton convinced him to stay on and see the operation through…What happened from there is what was described by me as a “masterful manipulation” by Leon Panetta….

In my initial communication to you of these events I described what unfolded as a temporary Coup initiated by high ranking intelligence and military officials. I stand by that term. These figures worked around the uncertainty of President Obama and the repeated resistance of Valerie Jarrett.

Again, read the entire detailed report here.

No incidentally, Ulster Man reports on his Facebook page the following:

ALERT: 6/5/11 9:00 PM Radio 77 WABC report. At 19:05 and 30:05 interview with former CIA and State Dept. member Larry Johnson CONFIRMING information originally produced by Insider regarding Bin Laden operation.

It is interesting that Panetta, who is now the Director of Central Intelligence, told a PBS radio news reporter that during the assault on bin Laden’s living quarters and on the terrorist himself there was a 25-minute blackout when the live-feed cameras mounted on the helmets of the attacking U.S. Navy SEALs was cut off.

A 25-minute blackout! Ah…the memory is jogged, as I’m sure Hillary Clinton’s was jogged, seeing that she sat on the Watergate Committee in 1973 that sought to impeach Richard Nixon and heard President Nixon’s secretary, Rose Mary Woods, speak about finding an [obviously damaging] 18½ -minute gap in the audiotape of a conversation between Nixon and his Chief-of-Staff H.”Bob” Haldeman.

As an important aside, given that the entire scenario of the birth certificate release and the bin Laden take-down may have been engineered by the Clinton Machine – look at the players, Panetta heading the list – consider the following:

It’s relevant to remember that Hillary was hired by Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat and a Watergate Chief of Staff attorney who supervised Hillary Rodham on the Watergate committee. She got the job on the recommendation of Burke Marshall a former law professor and attorney for Ted Kennedy during his Mary Jo Kopechne scandal. Once the committee’s investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary, saying: “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality, who against the wishes of the Democratic leadership and the Speaker of the House, Tip O’Neill, wanted to deprive Nixon of legal counsel.” Zeifman charged Hillary with writing a fraudulent legal brief and then confiscating public documents to hide her deception. To try to simplify the issue, the brief she wrote involved any previous court rulings about whether someone had the right to legal counsel when facing impeachment. When Zeifman heard about Hillary’s plans to try to prevent Nixon from obtaining counsel, he told her about the precedent set by Supreme Court Justice William Douglas, who himself obtained legal counsel when facing an impeachment proceeding in 1970. So in an effort which would eerily repeat itself in Travelgate and FBIgate years later at the White House, Hillary cleaned out the public files of the Judiciary Committee that contained the documents related to the Douglas proceedings and locked them in her office, which was unavailable to the public. Hillary then wrote the brief stating that there was no precedent to having counsel in an impeachment proceeding, and did not cite anything from the Douglas case. Zeifman stated that he believes she would have been disbarred if a judge had seen the brief. Additionally, Zeifman stated that had Hillary been successful in her efforts, the committee would not have been able to cross-examine witnesses and actually would NOT have been able to draft the Article of Impeachment against Nixon. And who was one of her co-conspirators in this mess? Why future Clinton White House Counsel, Bernard Nussbaum, who later spoke of Hillary as being a “star attorney” during her Watergate Committee stint. The story of this sordid event by Dan Calabrese has been written about here by Rick Moran at American Thinker. NOTE: Apparently one of the smartest women in America flunked the D.C. Bar exam just before she served on the Watergate Committee.

The only difference between what happens in a banana republic and what happened last week in D.C. is that the coup wasn’t immediately followed by General Petraeus taking to the airwaves to announce that Obama had resigned and that Biden was filling the void until the Congress could determine the way forward. However the facts revealed by the Insider demonstrate that Obama has had an internal shellacking and that he now understands that he really is not in control. It also makes clear to him that he’d better not go too far in usurping the powers of his office or “steps will be taken” by the same people who left him out of the loop in the bin Laden decision.

Or, for that matter, by George Soros, who at a private meeting shortly after Obama took a self-described “shellacking” at the polls in the midterm elections last November told a group of progressives in D.C. the following: “We have just lost this election; we need to draw a line. And if this president can’t do what we need, it is time to start looking somewhere else.”


A lot of people – as in the millions – believe that Trump is striking a resonant chord, which journalist Kyle-Anne Shiver has expanded upon. “Trump does seem to realize that our Republic is genuinely on the line. He seems to understand that the affirmative-action presidency may have temporarily made Americans feel better about themselves but that it has been very destructive for our economy and for the overall safety of the entire world.”

AWR Hawkins is also enthusiastic. “Since late 2006, when Barack Obama put people “on notice” about making fun of his big ears, the majority of Republicans in Congress and the Senate have become conditioned to jump when the President says, `boo’!…when Obama says `jump’, they just ask `how high’? Of course it doesn’t have to be this way. And we know this is so because Donald Trump, an outside-the-beltway television celebrity and real estate mogul, laughed when Obama said, `boo’ and afterwards we all saw the President jump for a change. Take it from Trump, Obama is beatable.”

Trump has not only flushed a birth certificate out of Obama (phony as it is) but he Рas well as the other expos̩s I mentioned Рhas flushed out his phony pacifism by assenting to the United States Military to invade a foreign country and assassinate bin Laden. Ha Рtake that Code Pink!

In short, Trump calls it as he sees it. And when he saw what the spectacularly-unqualified-for-the-job Obama was doing to his beloved America – and to his formidable pocketbook – he went into Trump mode, which was to question and challenge the amateur “president” who clearly knows nothing – or more horrifying, cares nothing – about America or about the fuel that has made America the most successful and generous country on the face of the earth: free-market capitalism and faithful adherence to the U.S. Constitution!

It goes without saying that Trump has hit a nerve. According to the highly reliable Rasmussen polling organization, a staggering 70 percent of Americans believe the country is moving down the wrong track.

“Coach” Kevin Collins says that Obama’s incompetence, bin Laden’s death and Karl Rove will combine to elect Donald Trump, which is hard to argue, except for the fact that no one knows if Trump will run.

It’s no exaggeration to say that Trump has shaken the political tree to its roots by facing down Obama and exposing what I believe is a multi-tentacle leftist cabal to ferret a true Trojan Horse into America’s body politic. To his credit, Trump has taken on the entire “system” – from the Hollywood phonies to the politically-impotent RINOs to the faux objective-journalists of the Left to the inveterately intolerant liberals.

Does anyone doubt his ability to fix our economy and our foreign policy and put our country back on track? If nothing else, his boldness and fearlessness should put every Republican presidential candidate on alert: Step up to the plate or be slapped down by a Leftist Machine that promises lifelong Communism for our beloved Republic.

There, I’ve said it. But then again, so would Trump!


Joan Swirsky is a New York-based author and journalist. She can be reached at Her website is
Update: Internet Engineer Declares Obama’s Long-Form Birth Certificate a Forgery


by Sharon Rondeau

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.

Image released by the White House which Obama claims is his birth certificate

(May 9, 2011) — The Post & Email was able to reach Mr. James Colby, who recently performed an analysis aired on a Colorado television station of the image released on April 27, 2011 by the White House purported to be a certified copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate from Hawaii. Mr. Colby stated during that interview that the image contained as many as 50 layers.

MRS. RONDEAU: How did you determine that there were as many as 50 layers in this image?

MR. COLBY: It started when you open the birth certificate in your browser, in Adobe Acrobat. It was a friend of mine who noticed that the text on the birth certificate would flash to white in and out. The reason it was doing that was that there were different layers in the document that caused the layers to flash as it rebuilt the preview layer by layer. So those layers would flash over the top and rebuild that image in that way. From there, you can open it in Adobe Illustrator and see those layers first-hand.

MRS. RONDEAU: If the image had come from a paper document and then been scanned in and put on a computer screen, what would have happened when you opened it?

MR. COLBY: Almost all scanned images would be a single layer, so zooming in and out, there would have been nothing noticeable. Additionally, if you zoom in using Acrobat with your browser on a lot of the text, you’ll notice that it appears jagged and a single color. That’s not original. A pen doesn’t write in a single color; as you write lighter, the color is lighter; as you press harder, it’s darker than everything else. So writing in pen is not a single solid color, and when it scanned, anti-aliased, which means that the square pixels on the edges fade to make it appear smooth. Most of the text in the document including a large portion of the signatures is just a single blotch of color. The likely explanation is that someone just drew them in using a tool similar to “pencil” in Adobe Photoshop.

MRS. RONDEAU: Do you think that this came from any kind of a paper document originally?

MR. COLBY: There’s definitely a component of it that came from a paper document originally and was then edited after the fact. I can’t tell you how much of it was taken from a paper document unless the entire thing was connected. Another aspect to this is that in Illustrator, you can examine what’s called the “Clipboard.” Let’s say if you’re editing a paper document and you add another document and you are cutting fragments of other documents to paste over them to produce a final copy. The Clipboard on a computer is like all those cutouts, if you will, a kind of storage place. The clipboard for this document is still intact in its original form. It reflects the objects that have been “cut” from somewhere else and “pasted” into this document. By the way, all the things in the clipboard are rotated at 90 degrees without any explanation. Basically, there’s no computer-based explanation for that.

There are things in the clipboard that are notable; for instance, the “type of occupation outside home during pregnancy;” the “Non” in “none.” That’s in the clipboard…both the dates, “20″ and “22,” are on the clipboard. The signature of the state registrar and the April 25th date are both foreign objects.

There are explanations that people have proposed. Some have proposed OCR, which is Optical Character Recognition, and that’s when scanners are giving computers the ability to read text. But that doesn’t apply here because OCR converts things into text, not images of text. All of the information in this document is stored as an image.

MRS. RONDEAU: How long have you been involved in work with documents?

MR. COLBY: I’ve been doing graphic arts since 2004 using Version 5 of Adobe Creative Suite, but I’m also a programmer. I’m a LAMP developer with a specialty in dynamic graphics. I’ve developed quite a few notable online graphics programs myself, from scratch, including a GD image editor, a 3D dynamic graphing generator, a system to develop the entire graphic profile of a site dynamically. I’m a little bit more than a graphic artist; I’m an internet engineer.

MRS. RONDEAU: What is your work background?

MR. COLBY: I incorporated my first IT company in 2004 and have been self employed since. I’ve been self-employed since 2004. I started our current business back in 2007, and I got started in the technology field early through an internship when I was about 15 or 16. I have not stopped working since.

Image which circulated on the internet in October 2009 and again last week following the release of an image from the White House purported to be Obama's long-form birth certificate

MRS. RONDEAU: Would you say that analyzing this particular image was difficult? Did you have to look closely to find the 50 layers?

MR. COLBY: It was incredibly obvious.

The Post & Email then asked Mr. Colby if he was familiar with the “Blaine document” which had appeared on the internet as early as October 2009 but resurfaced last week following the release from the White House. We mentioned that to the untrained eye, the formatting of the two images appeared similar. Mr. Colby responded that he had not seen the Blaine image, so we sent it to him. We asked him to comment on whether or not he believed that the White House long-form image was assembled from the Blaine image, as some have suggested. Mr. Colby responded:

“I can’t find a high enough resolution sample to make any actual image based determinations. I will say the parent and attendant signatures have some appearance of being signed from the same hand, with attempt to create variation. Only one background mark seems to coincide between the two documents, while the rest are independent between – so the certificate released by the white house is not based on the “Blaine” document. Information like name, address, etc. obviously correlate but are publicly available so there is no significance.”

Mr. Colby’s final comments to us were, “One thing about documents is that it is possible to make flawless forgeries, especially with the resources of the Executive office. That’s what brings this into question; there’s no question that they have the ability to make a flawless forgery if they desire. So the question is, ‘Why was this released?’”

The Post & Email then asked him, “If you had a flawless forgery on the screen in front of you, could you detect that it was forged?” and he said, “No. If the proper resources research was were put into it, it’s would be impossible to detect it without having access to external information like original records from the issuer of the given document.”

Mr. Colby left some instructions whereby readers can discover for themselves the information he has presented about the White House image release:
Verify yourself:
In your browser (acrobat):
Visit the original certificate at Zoom in rapidly, in and out. The text flashing is your computer revealing the upper layers with a slight delay to process the preview of each.
In Adobe Illustrator:
Visit the original certificate at Go to File – “Save Page As” in your respective browser. Save the page somewhere where you may easily access it. Then, either open it by browsing to it, right clicking on it, and selecting “open with”; finally selecting Adobe Illustrator (you might have to browse to find the program), or open Adobe Illustrator, select open, and browse to the file (make sure to select *.* “Any Type” in the bottom dropdown). Once open, you may navigate the individual layers yourself and hide their visibility; additionally, if you go to Windows-Actions and select the “Links” tab, you may view the clipboard associated with the original birth certificate.

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Obama’s Clown Show Continues


by Greg Easley, ©2011

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.

Is Obama carrying on a side show rather than revealing his history?

(May 7, 2011) — “Every man’s work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man’s work of what sort it is.” 1st Corinthians 3:13

After calling Donald Trump a “carnival barker” for having the courage to bring Obama’s eligibility front and center, Obama proceeds to unleash his own combination of medicine show and circus act filled with his re-treaded menagerie of goofy clowns on the American people with all the infantile bluster and magical idiocy of a brain dead mystical Merlin on a self induced Cheech and Chong crack binge.

The news is so full of contradictory sleight of hand ups and downs that I seriously doubt anyone can make heads or tails out of anything we have witnessed the past 10 days. Lies, forgeries, mistakes, disinformation abound across the pages of every media available. Videos and news flashes that proclaim Obama and his clucks as heroes, idiots or liars all day long! I don’t know whether to throw up, yell yippee or move to another country. These people in DC are obviously lost in a cloud of something I never tried and so desperate that they just can’t grasp one ounce of reality for even a moment. Meanwhile our semi-earnest GOP led Congress and minority Senate look like shell shocked combat veterans a half hour after the Battle of The Bulge was over! At the very least those heroic vets knew what was happening and refused to surrender to the enemy. By the way, is Obama going to give up his Peace Prize after becoming a covert killer? Just wondering.

Is there any sanity left in Washington! Where is the leadership! Do we have to rely on Trump to call a “spade a spade”? Where’s Boehner, Cantor and McConnell? What are they waiting for, the “Gang Of Six” led by Chambliss, Crapo and Coburn to knife us in the back with a hidden tax trigger? Are we waiting for the GOP to cave on the Debt Ceiling hike that every economist and stock market analyst with a brain knows DOES NOT and SHOULD NOT be raised ever again. Are we waiting for someone to figure out that Paul Ryan’s courageous plan to solve the debt crisis does not go far enough while the communist led Democrats hold the GOP for ransom with threats of racism or killing grannies all across the nation? What is wrong with these people? Has the Council On Foreign Relations threatened to kill them all if they act against the utter destruction of Our Nation?

Obama lied about his Birth, can’t seem to get his facts straight on “his” killing of the “already dead Bin Laden”, invites former President Bush to join him in NY to collect his coup while insulting the real Geronimo and all his descendants. Fortunately Bush declined to be used by Obama and his clan of clucks. Obama deserves no credit for anything worthy since the day he was born, whenever that was. All Obama has done, with Bernanke and Geithner covering, is accelerate America’s economic demise while spending like a madman untold millions of dollars traveling around the world with his medicine show. The question I have for Obama is: Are you still against water boarding and Gitmo? Pathetic! Osama was already Dead and it is all a Lie (7 part video series).

Wake up America! We are being conned by committed lunatics who can’t even look you in the face and pledge; “I will save The United States or die trying”. No – they want Us dead broke, dead silent, and just plain dead. This most recent clown act is real and deliberate, launched to cloud and re-cloud every valid issue and marginalize anyone that would stand up to expose them. While this latest performance has been pathetically orchestrated by incompetents in a reactive set of blunders to keep the average American confused and to cover up each preceding step along the way, it is even more dangerous than a plan where anyone could actually follow the logic, the steps and the conclusion.

This nauseating display of witchery is bleeding us dry and the GOP seems paralyzed to stop it. Obama just called for a mileage tax, another diversion from the “Gang of Six’s” tax trigger and away from the incontestable fact that Obama is illegal and has no debt plan of his own, except to raise our taxes every way he can in order to pay for his unlimited debit card financed by the Federal Reserve Bank with your depleted fiat dollars and stolen Social Security funds. Record food prices, $7 dollar gas by Christmas, 40% loss of your home values, a crippled 401k by winter, no jobs to pay the rent and no way to make up for the losses in your lifetime. That’s his pledge to America – “Change We Will Bleed You With”!

It is not our fault that our government is broke.

Obama and his highwaymen want us to “give something back” like we are all rich. Only 50% of us pay any income tax while the rest pay nothing or live off our labor for free. I already gave them 35% of my 401k and 30% of my home equity. I give them 10% of my earned and retirement income every year, not with income taxes, but from inflation alone. Now he wants more from us and will take it one way or another – more taxes, more QE and endless wasteful spending.

I have an idea to save America. Why doesn’t Boehner and McConnell set up a meeting with the “Anointed One” and offer him two choices:

His resignation, along with all those complicit commies in DC who covered up his Treason.
These two stellar Republicans will go to their bunkers for safety and expose the whole sham.

Or how about this idea. Instead of forcing us to “pay our fair share” of the debt our government incurred on its own, we seize all the assets of the Federal Reserve, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and George Soros and pay off our debt and refund the money stolen from our Social Security “accounts”. Sounds like a more righteous solution than what Obama has planned for us. He did it for his Union thugs by giving them a share of GM; he can do the same for us. I want my share of Goldman Sachs and I want my share of George Soros vampired fortune after he is arrested for treason and sedition.

Where is the Tea Party while all this is going on? Why aren’t Americans calling for Obama’s resignation? Where is that Presidential candidate with enough clarity and courage to stop America from being bleed to death by Dr. Omega-commie and his Alpha Cling-on female road gang? What are the States and their governors going to do about any of this? Where is the retired American Army General with enough fire left in his belly to demand that the Council On Foreign Relations and the Federal Reserve be shut down and exiled into oblivion. Where is the rest of America’s Donald Trumps? We’ve seen a few courageous conservative women step forward – where are the men?

Its time for a political pole shift, hard right to starboard to get their attention. Time for Americans to demand satisfaction by slapping these silly doofs across the face with the Constitution and exposing them publicly for what they are on the field of honor, which happens to be our homeland. Bullies and cowards who ghost their way throughout the night with nothing but wickedness on their minds and evil in their hearts. America was not made for this. America is a dream for all who will honor and share her promise, not a nightmare for all who would seek to destroy her! What will you do for America today? What will you do when America is no more?

We need to wake up. Canada said NO on Monday to the Liberal takeover of their nation and for good reason. They are horrified at what has happened to us. Their debt is no where near as bad as ours and their housing market did not crash when ours did. They voted NO to a Federal Reserve style bank 50 years ago and they basically voted NO to Obama’s death star, the North American Unionization of Canada and to the new currency that you will see if we lose this battle.

To defeat this tyranny of betrayal that bears down on us with poison and death, We must reclaim the vision passed to us by our Founding Fathers. We must join together, all of us, to save our nation from the poison that attacks our children, our elderly, our veterans, the poison that attacks our history, the poison that attacks our decency. We must put aside our petty differences and our belief in entitlements. We must join together, all of us, to save our nation from the death of our heritages, our traditions, our laws, our dreams, our liberties and our Republican government.

We must join together, all of us, as Americans and unite with Conservative members in Congress and from across the land whose honor is still evident and again demand an alliance of salvation for our nation. We must do this in haste and in earnest or We will all perish. We must stand our posts and demand, “loyalty be present” amongst us, from all with the courage and the soul to join us. Again I ask, what will you do for America today! This is my America . . . the one my father fought for. He died before Obama took office, and I am thankful he did not have to witness the sins of this man who would be king, the man that despises everything we are!

“The cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it. And there is one path we shall never choose, and that is the path of surrender, or submission.” John F. Kennedy


Greg Easley is a professional Information Technology Analyst and a devout political conservative concerned about the destiny of The United States of America and the free world. He is a member of the Tea Party and publisher of his own web site The 4th Awakening. The site features his own commentaries and important political news items posted daily. Greg lives in the Atlanta, Georgia area. Please join him at:

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Is the Lack of an Embossed Seal the Key?


by Sharon Rondeau

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.

The image which the White House released identifies the name of the birth hospital

(May 5, 2011) — On April 27, 2011, Barack Hussein Obama held a press conference following the release of what he claimed is a copy of his long-form birth certificate on file with the Hawaii Department of Health in Honolulu.

The image does not appear to contain an embossed seal, just as that of the “Certification of Live Birth” released on the internet in June 2008 lacked that sign of authentication. The registration number of the short-form document had also been blacked out, which, according to the statement on the bottom of the form, “invalidated the certificate.”

Obama himself claimed that the short-form certification was his “official birth certificate,” which could not have been true, given that he released something more detailed on April 27. However, many had already labeled it a forgery.

Upon releasing the image in June 2008, the Daily KOS stated, “In any case, here is Obama’s birth certificate.” However, that claim was disproved by the more detailed long-form birth certificates released by Eleanor Nordyke, whose twin girls were born a day after Obama’s alleged birth at Kapiolani Medical Center in Honolulu.

One similarity between the Certification of Live Birth and the image posted last Wednesday is that neither bears an embossed seal. However, the birth certificates released by Mrs. Nordyke do, in the bottom-middle section between the signatures of the Director of Health and the Registrar General.

The U.S. State Department has strict requirements for those applying for U.S. passports, which the images Obama has claimed are his “birth certificates” do not meet because they lack an official seal. How, then, can these images be considered proof of anything? Why would they not have contained a seal from the state of Hawaii?

An article describing Obama’s alleged birth and early childhood in Hawaii written by Will Hoover of the Honolulu Star-Advertiser on November 9, 2008 states that “While most Obama residences can be traced, the hospital where he was born is difficult to document.” Why should anyone’s birth hospital be “difficult to document?” Hoover stated that a Kapiolani spokeswoman could not confirm Obama’s birth there due to the HIPAA law passed in 1996. He was careful to say that “according to Obama’s family and other sources, [Obama] was born at that hospital on Aug. 4, 1961.”

Perhaps that is because In 2006, the same journalist had stated that Obama had been born in Indonesia in an article comparing Obama to Tammy Duckworth, a candidate for Congress. At that time, Hoover said that Duckworth and Obama had in common that they were both born outside the country. After a barrage of emails “correcting” him, the story was changed to say that both Duckworth and Obama had attended Punahou School and that Obama had been born in Hawaii. He failed to cite sources for either of the birthplaces he listed for Obama except a “Google search” and “an editor telling me about the error.”

A journalist’s job is to research various sources to find and report the truth. Why would any good journalist change his story based on the word of an editor or a large number of emails? Where was the verification that he was born either in Indonesia or Hawaii?

It is well-known that George W. Bush was born in New Haven, CT, and no HIPAA law seems to have prevented its discussion. The law was passed in 1996 and Bush was elected president in 2000.

Obama’s purported long-form is missing the entire bottom section which the Nordyke documents contain, including the signatures and embossed seal. There is a date stamp of April 25, 2011 and a registrar’s stamp, but no official signatures. According to the State Department, the document is therefore incomplete and not a certified copy of an original birth certificate.

Even after the release of the long-form image last week, Kapiolani Medical Center refused to confirm Obama’s birth there. A long-time resident of Hawaii whose neighbor’s children were born there stated that the hospital of birth actually fills out the birth report and then sends it to the Health Department. If that is the case, then Kapiolani should have a record for Obama, based on what Obama himself has told the public.

Since Obama has officially announced that he was born at Kapiolani, why will hospital public relations staff not confirm it? They would not be breaking any privacy laws since Obama has already disseminated the information.

The “marriage” of Barack Obama Sr. and Stanley Ann Dunham might not have any validity, as Obama Sr. already had a wife in Kenya. He was a polygamist who, instead of “quitting” his studies at Harvard, was actually asked to leave because of his multiple wives and a situation which arose with another woman from the United Kingdom. Is this one of the things Obama had hoped to hide from the general public?

Barack Obama Sr. was a citizen of Great Britain, and if citizenship flows from a father to his son, Obama Jr. was also born a citizen of Great Britain, regardless of whether or not he was born in the United States.

Document which appears to be a school registration form for Barack Hussein Obama in Indonesia indicating his citizenship as "Indonesian"

Following his several alleged residences in Hawaii from birth to age 6, Obama Jr. reportedly went to live in Indonesia after his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, married Lolo Soetoro, who had been a student at the University of Hawaii’s East-West Center. It is reported that in the 1960s in Indonesia, a wife with foreign citizenship had to become an Indonesian citizen. It is possible that Obama had to do the same in order to attend school. If he ever had U.S. citizenship, how was it affected?

National Public Radio (NPR) had declared that Obama was born in Kenya, as did several African newspapers. An Indonesian newspaper said the same thing, even specifying the village of his birth. Members of the Kenyan Parliament proudly announced it on the record during a session in March 2010.

Has there ever been a person occupying the White House who had more foreign influence? Is this the very thing which the Founders had feared when they included the term “natural born Citizen” in Article II of the U.S. Constitution?

Has the extensive foreign influence from Obama’s past manifested itself in his reluctance to take out America’s enemies with a “persistent hesitation to act”? Why was he described as “an absentee president,” having been called off of the golf course to attend a national security meeting shortly before the operation to kill bin Laden was carried out by Navy SEALS?

Has faux Secretary of State Hillary Clinton been leaking Obama’s indecision about bin Laden and other matters to the press? Is the reason the State Department has tightened its requirements to issue U.S. passports that she knows Obama would not qualify for one?

And what about Obama’s regime awarding U.S. citizenship to three men convicted on charges which connected them to international terrorism? What does that say about Obama’s view of U.S. citizenship?

Does Obama even possess U.S. citizenship himself? Does an alleged birth in Hawaii automatically grant it? Did he become a citizen of Indonesia, and if so, did he ever naturalize in the United States, renouncing that foreign citizenship?

Is foreign influence the reason that Obama made himself chairman of the United Nations Security Council? Is that why Muommar Qaddafi called Obama “his son?”

How are these foreign influences affecting the U.S. military? Can they follow the orders of someone who seems to favor foreign enemies over domestic strength and victory? Is foreign influence the reason that Obama has refused to release photos of the SEAL operation to kill bin Laden, stating that the photos do not indicate “who we are as a country”?

Is Obama’s Muslim background the reason he allocated, by executive order, $20.3 million for Palestinians to relocate to the United States? Is it why he bowed to the Saudi king?

Is foreign influence and “Muslim faith” the reasons that Obama supported the Muslim Brotherhood as a force in the future Egyptian government?

Is Obama qualified to represent the United States of America? Why did Ali Mazrui, a Kenyan historian, claim that Obama is a Kenyan citizen? Ali Mazrui incorrectly stated that Obama did not suppress the use of his middle name, Hussein, during the presidential campaign, but in an essay dated July 6, 2009, he stated that Obama possessed “triple ancestral heritage” and “underplayed his his African and his Muslim ancestry.”

Why have numerous African newspapers reported that Obama is “Kenyan-born?”

Do we not deserve a real American as our president? When will the military decide that enough is enough? Will the American people?

Despite the misleading title of a Fox News article, a document examiner who attempted to defend the long-form document did not rule out the possibility that it is a forgery. If the birth documents Obama has released are forgeries, do we have a choice?

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.