Before It's News | People Powered News

Thursday, March 31, 2011

It’s Much More Than the Birth Certificate, Mr. Trump!
Editors Note: Reprinted with permission from The Post and Email

March 31, 2011

What did the Framers mean by the term "natural born Citizen?"

Mr. Donald Trump
Trump Organization
725 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10022

Dear Mr. Trump,

Thank you for taking up the Barack Obama issue. You are the only person who has questioned publicly, “Why is the king wearing no clothes?!” All the people who one would have presumed and expected to take the lead have apparently refused to do so for reasons of political expediency, fear of being called a racist, just going along with the Party line, or because of their own complicity. They are all cowards and traitors to this country!

Let me explain. You have the birth certificate issue correct, but there is so much more to this story, Mr. Trump. Even if Obama had been born in this country (which has never been proved or even vetted), that would not in and of itself qualify him to meet the Constitution’s requirement of being a natural born Ccitizen, a child born of two American citizens and born in this country. One must be of the blood and of the soil. Obama had a father who was subject to the British Crown and so was Obama at his birth. He has openly acknowledged being born a British citizen. So, the birth certificate issue is important, but Obama’s dual-citizenship and divided allegiance are even more important.

As one who was born and raised in New York state, I want to be as blunt as maybe only we New Yorkers can be: Barack Hussein Obama is a radical socialist who, with the aiding and abetting of the Democratic Party and most likely the Republican Party, and judges from the lower levels right up to the Supreme Court, and with the complicit mainstream media providing cover, is neither qualified nor eligible to serve as President of the United States. He is a usurper! How did he get there? Who funded him? Is George Soros behind it? Has there been a conspiracy and fraud committed upon America the likes of which we have never before seen in this country? To see all the evidence that has been gathered so far (Obama’s Kenyan father, his Connecticut SSAN, phony ‘BC”, questionable Selective Service Registration, et al), and to be deprived at every legitimate quarter (Congress, the Courts, the media, etc.) for evidence substantiating who Obama really is, one would more than likely have to say, “America has been deceived.”

We Americans have been punked, lied to, marginalized and put in prison (LTC Lakin, LCDR Fitzpatrick) to protect the usurper squatting in our White House. Why has Obama been propped up and protected so vociferously? Is the answer that our Constitution, our capitalist, free-market system was overthrown in the 2008 election so that radical socialists could effect their warped ideas of redistribution, statism, and godless philosophies on an America they hate? I do not think one needs to look much further for the truth than that, only deeper.

There have been millions of us protesting and trying to get our Congressmen, the media, and the courts to vet Obama, all to no avail. And now comes Donald Trump who obviously suffers no fools and starts asking questions. And because you are a celebrity and have wealth and status, you are being listened to. What us regular Americans have been unable to do for 2-1/2 years, you are starting to do by blowing the lid off the silence. I say “starting” because I realize you have just waded into the morass and there is so much more to this story, as you are probably already discovering.

In short, Mr. Trump, you have looked at the buck-naked king and asked the obvious question. I have no doubt that you have the temerity to dig deeper, the strength of character and personality to take on Obama’s propaganda machine, and the resolve to see this issue blown wide open. You will surely be one for the history books, Mr. Trump, because out of more than 300 million Americans, you are the ONLY person who has taken on Barack Hussein Obama, the Great Pretender, the Marxist who hates America. Now let’s finish the job and save our Constitution, our American way of life and free-market system, and out the usurper and all those in the Obama conspiracy and clean house! America is behind you! Just ask for whatever information you want and I will gladly help facilitate getting it to you. My phone number is …………..and email is …………...

Gratefully yours and God Bless America!

Kathleen Gotto

© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

Friday, March 25, 2011

Lucas Smith Comes to Theresa Cao’s Defense on Obama’s Eligibility


by Sharon Rondeau

Lucas Smith and Sean Boyer have stated that Smith obtained this document from the Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya showing that Barack Hussein Obama II was born there and not in Hawaii, as he has claimed

(Mar. 25, 2011) — Theresa Cao has a new spokesman and a new ally, and they are not the same person.

Cao has told The Post & Email that Mr. Sean Boyer will be acting as her spokesperson effective today. Boyer has recently arranged for Ms. Cao to appear on several recent internet radio programs.

Cao now has reported that she will be including the Kenyan birth certificate document, a copy of which was sent to all members of the 111th Congress last year, as an addendum to the Exhibits in her Motion to Dismiss relating to her case which arose from the January 6, 2011 reading of the U.S. Constitution by the House of Representatives.

When The Post & Email asked Cao why she shouted out “Except Obama! Except Obama!” during the reading that day, she said, “Everyone in Congress already knew and they said nothing,” referring to the letter mailed by Lucas Smith to each congressman along with a copy of the alleged Kenyan birth certificate.

Cao mentioned that Mr. Boyer has contacted Donald Trump, who recently called for Obama to release his birth certificate. Trump has stated that Obama’s “family members” cannot agree on the hospital in which Obama was born and that Obama has failed to live up to his promise of being transparent.

Today, The Post & Email has learned that every member of the 112th Congress has also received the letter and copy of the alleged birth certificate sent last September. Of that development, Cao said, “Congress was forewarned before the reading of the Constitution, so they were making a big show [on January 6].”

Mr. Boyer, Cao’s new spokesperson, granted The Post & Email a detailed interview today which follows.

MRS. RONDEAU: How did you come to be involved with Lucas Smith and now Theresa Cao?

MR. BOYER: I contacted Lucas Smith over 21 months ago, almost two years ago, to bring out the birth certificate for potential authentication. I contacted him by email and told him that I would help represent him to media or to attorneys about whom we could decide might be able to help us. So after establishing a rapport with him, he agreed and authorized me to be his agent and to represent him on any number of issues regarding this.

Lucas put out a letter to 535 Congressmen and women informing them of the circumstances of how he obtained that document and also saying that he was willing to testify. He individually signed and addressed each of these letters. It wasn’t just a form letter; throughout the body of the letter, it referred to the particular congressman addressed.

Lucas did a monumental job, and you have to give him a lot of credit. There’s a patriot in the background who paid for all of that, and we have to appreciate, as Americans, the people who are working behind the scenes trying to help restore justice for our Constitution on this matter.

I have continued to work on and off with Lucas over all these months, giving him some advice and suggestions and making contacts for him. I made contacts with several attorneys who ultimately did not work out.

MRS. RONDEAU: Are you a professional spokesperson or do you have a background in the field?

MR. BOYER: No, I’m just a businessman. I’m a self-employed businessman, inventor, and a patriot. I was concerned when I originally learned about the birth certificate being sold on eBay through an article I read in WorldNetDaily. Before the election, I was also concerned about the qualifications of Obama for President of the United States.

As soon as I noticed that article, I read the sale on eBay. I had been an eBay seller and was familiar with their system, so I thought, “This looks potentially plausible.” That’s why I hung with it and finally contacted Lucas and began to try to help him.

In a similar way, and just recently, I recontacted him and I said, “Let’s give a different attorney a try,” and he agreed to that, so that is in process.

MRS. RONDEAU: A few days ago, I read that Lucas Smith had stated publicly that he would testify in front of Congress about the Kenyan birth certificate.

MR. BOYER: Yes, I believe he stated that in the letter also.

MRS. RONDEAU: What do you think about the term “birther,” especially now that Donald Trump has called upon Obama to release his birth certificate and perhaps some other records?

MR. BOYER: If I’m a “birther” and you’re on the other side, by pure logic, you must be a “deather,” and the death that you’re seeking is for our Constitution. I’m a Constitutionalist, and the term “birther” is a left-wing pejorative; it’s a smear. I don’t accept it, but with the power they have in the media, even Constitutionalists such as Theresa and Lucas refer to themselves as “birthers.”

MRS. RONDEAU: Even Greta Van Susteren used the term last night, almost three years since the news emerged that there was a problem with Obama’s eligibility and subsequent occupation of the White House.

MR. BOYER: It’s my opinion that Obama was planted there as the result of a Saul Alinsky, decades-long conspiracy to deconstruct America. There have been numerous assaults on our Constitution: taking over the health care industry, taking over the automotive industry, the student loan industry, and ceding our power to the U.N.; unilaterally decommissioning NASA and saying, “We’re going to ‘hitch a ride‘ with the Russians.” That’s Obama’s quote; always a sound byte, always looking to get in with the “cool” crowd. We are going to ‘hitch a ride’ with the Russians for $53,000,000 per astronaut…we are going to allow them to determine what cargo we put on their vessel to take into outer space? We have given away our cosmic supremacy unilaterally, without even a public debate about it! What kind of backroom deals were done for that?

MRS. RONDEAU: Then there are the questions about his order to launch Tomahawk missiles on Libya, and the military followed the orders.

MR. BOYER: They are taking their marching orders from the top down; they are concerned about their jobs and their pensions, and if you stand out like Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, God bless him, then you end up in jail where he is.

MRS. RONDEAU: Are you familiar with Walter Fitzpatrick, who filed the first criminal complaint of treason against Obama two years ago?


MRS. RONDEAU: He is quite sure that the military knows that Obama is a fraud.

MR. BOYER: I’m certain they do. The sad part about it is that Obama is a person who has been willing to allow any number of powerful forces, not only in our nation, but also abroad, to have the dirt on him, all for the power of the office. What kind of an individual puts him or herself in a situation where he knows that the opposition has all the leverage in the world to extort him and our nation? It’s a sort of individual who is very, very power-hungry and egotistical. Somehow Obama has been supported through all of that because they knew he was a tool to accomplish their ends, which is to deconstruct America, collapse the dollar, dismantle our Constitution, reconstitute some new name for the piece of land that we live on, change our government, and have it controlled under some U.N. conglomerate corporations, the same ones that are paying for all of the campaigns of every single elected official. So they’re all beholden to these unnamed powers.

Nancy Pelosi said she was "prepared to lose seats in 2010" in order to pass health care "reform," the constitutionality of which is now being debated

The point that I’d like to bring out is “Never mind who didn’t read the bill. Who wrote the bill?” No one asked that simple question. Who wrote the bill? What do you mean, “We’re going to have to pass the law, Speaker Pelosi, before we can know what’s in it?” I want to know what’s in it before it’s signed, and I want to know who wrote it, and I want to know who they’re working for. And then I want an investigation into the corporation; for instance, Senate Bill 510…are you familiar with that?


MR. BOYER: They want to prevent us from planting a garden in our back yard and from giving our neighbor a bushel of tomatoes in return for an apple pie. They want to make that illegal. That is astounding. The American people, by and large, don’t know about that.

MRS. RONDEAU: Why do you think Obama was chosen as the person to push this agenda?

MR. BOYER: He has a resonance in his voice, he has a need for power, he has the vigor for the campaign trail and the itinerary, and he has the cadence, the mesmerizing cadence, no matter what he’s saying, that seems to somehow lull people into a complacency and a willingness to blindly follow him. These are actually brainwashing techniques. He does not say anything substantive.

MRS. RONDEAU: I read that he returned from South America a bit early because of the high level of criticism he received for going when he did and authorizing action in Libya without consulting Congress. One Democrat called that an “impeachable offense.” But Theresa Cao stressed that no one in the 111th or 112th Congress has done anything about all of the evidence supporting Obama’s ineligibility for office.

MR. BOYER: Let me comment on that briefly. The patriot who paid for all of the letters, notarizations, and everything involved with the mailing, which cost about $3,000, also funded a website which is linked from Lucas Smith’s Inspector Smith YouTube channel. It is an informative site with PDFs so that the American people can download information to help gain awareness of this issue. That man has told me personally over the phone that he sent the same information to each of the new members of Congress. So they have all been notified, every single one of them. That is important to know.

MRS. RONDEAU: Do you know when that was sent to the new Congress?

MR. BOYER: Shortly after they came in; I could contact the man. Has it already been disclosed to you who this benefactor is?


MR. BOYER: I have spoken to him a number of times, and he assured me that he did inform the rest of the members of Congress. This should be publicized so that they know that they’re being held accountable and that it is public that they have all received the information.

MRS. RONDEAU: What will you be doing for Theresa in the near future?

MR. BOYER: I have set up and she has taken a couple of interviews. I set up the interview with Jim “Howie” Mandel, Jr., which went very, very well, and also with Andrea Shea King. So as we progress, I’ll continue to set up more interviews for her. At first I saw a story about Theresa, perhaps on Fox News, and of course, there were follow-up stories and videos on the internet. I saw Boehner’s response the following day, which was, of course, very disappointing. You’re aware of what I’m talking about, correct?

MRS. RONDEAU: Yes, when he said that if Hawaii said Obama was born there, “That’s good enough for me.“

MR. BOYER: Yes, it was very disappointing and lets you know that he’s just part of the big cabal. I watched the story a little bit and then I saw how Theresa had her hearing and no one showed up. That got my attention. Then there was a call by different people on the internet to please go and at least witness Theresa’s hearing, and again, no one showed up. I was stunned by that, because I thought, “OK, there must be a lot of local people in the political sea of Washington, DC.” I figured there would be fellow activists on the sidewalk who would be compelled to support her, and I was stunned when there weren’t.

First of all, I called an attorney and asked if he would be willing to travel down and defend her. There were some articles that said she had to dismiss her attorney because she didn’t feel that she was getting the communication she needed from him in order to feel confident that he was fully aware of how she felt and the facts and that he would be fighting in her best interest in a way that she agreed with. This attorney evidently wasn’t willing to give her the disclosure that she felt she needed. I personally don’t blame her. Any attorney who doesn’t freely and openly communicate with you would make you wonder whether or not they have your best interests at heart. So I thought, “I wonder if there’s any way that I can help?” I then contacted an attorney whom I consider a friend.

MRS. RONDEAU: This wasn’t the attorney from the Rutherford Institute?

MR. BOYER: That’s not the one I had contacted, no.

MRS. RONDEAU: Was it April Downs, her public defender, or some other attorney?

MR. BOYER: It’s another attorney whose advice I asked in regard to the situation with Theresa. He did give me his advice, and I contacted Theresa and related that to her. Then I thought, “Well, how could I help her?” and I thought perhaps I could set up some interviews for her so that she would be able to get her story out and perhaps, if nothing else, it might inspire individuals to come out and support her in her hearings.

So I left my phone number and Theresa called me; we spoke at length about her situation. I explained to her somewhere along the way I had also been helping Lucas Smith. At that time, she was not aware of who Lucas Smith was. That was a big piece of the puzzle that I thought could really help and be to her benefit regarding the information that he has been able to gather and the body of work he has accomplished and the fact that he has offered to testify in any court in the land on this issue for months now. He also showed up in Santa Ana, CA, at Judge David O. Carter’s courtroom in September 2009 with a signed declaration and was willing to testify then. However, he was not allowed to testify. When he got out on the sidewalk, there was a video done by William Waggoner.

MRS. RONDEAU: I’ve seen that.

MR. BOYER: He was standing right there and read his declaration. Orly Taitz was there at the time, and the document was very closely videoed at the time. Again, it was very supportive; it showed his courage to be willing to come out in public and to try to make progress with this issue. When it comes down to it, Lucas Smith has shown the tenacity and the courage to make a difference on this issue.

MRS. RONDEAU: Do you believe that the document Smith has was obtained in Kenya from the hospital?

MR. BOYER: Absolutely. I wouldn’t spend a moment trying to help at no compensation to myself all these many months if I did not believe that the evidence that he brings forward is able to be authenticated. I absolutely believe it, without a doubt. Without a doubt.

MRS. RONDEAU: Why was Lucas in Africa initially?

MR. BOYER: He was there with a Congolese national on a totally unrelated mission as an aspiring author. When he was there, the indigenous people kept referring to Obama as being a Kenyan. That’s when he switched his focus for his story and decided to investigate it. Within a few days, he had committed himself to doing whatever he could to see if he could obtain Barack Obama’s long-form birth certificate from the Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. So that is what he did.

Once he was there and embarked on this alternative mission, he hatched a plan to pay for the birth certificate and to pay to get access to the hospital. He had the additional funds wired to him. In a recent public interview, he called in and said he “wired money from himself to himself.”

When he returned to the United States, he launched into trying to bring publicity to the story. He contacted congressmen and women and had a disappointing response, and that’s when he hatched a plan of putting the document on eBay. He had had a lot of experience buying and selling on eBay, so that seemed like a natural thing for him to try to do. I think that was successful in raising attention, and that’s what got the story covered on WorldNetDaily and other news outlets.

Over the course of time, he has exhausted his funds. Personally, I would like to help him set up some sort of a fund so that he could continue doing his research. I feel the same way for Theresa Cao. These are people who, when they’re doing all this work behind the scenes, they’re not making an income. Lucas has put in a tremendous amount of time, effort and research. That’s why I think it would be only fair to set up a fund to help people working on this cause.

We want to use the work and accomplishment of Lucas Smith to defend Theresa Cao in her court case, which I think is a civil rights case. It’s also a constitutional defense case. When I contacted Theresa and learned of her situation and what she’s up against, I also took the time, and she took the time to hear, about all the progress that’s been made in regard to Lucas Smith’s evidence and the birth certificate. That’s why I have come forward as somebody who can stand back, look at what’s going on, and follow the different champions of the cause, each in their own way, and to help try to put people together so that they can synergistically benefit from each other’s efforts rather than everybody having their own little dog-and-pony show all over our nation and never really being able to get the traction to make a difference for our country.

Two years has gone by. Lt. Col. Terry Lakin is in jail right now. Our Constitution is being dismantled right now, and as far as I’m concerned, this is a crisis. I am going to take time out of my businesses, out of my life, to do whatever I can for our country.

There’s been a comment on the internet blogs referring to the situation, this constitutional crisis, where we have a usurper, a fraud, in the office of the President of the United States. In my opinion, and from what I’ve seen, he is most probably not even an American citizen, much less a natural born American Citizen. This is a crisis.

This situation has been described as a “bloodless coup.” There is no such thing as a bloodless coup; it is an oxymoron. To establish the free nation and the Constitution that we have, the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, our citizens fought and died and spilled their blood on our soil and on the soil of nations around the world for decades. They fought and died, and they spilled their blood to achieve the freedom that America represents, not only for our country, but for the whole world. So if we allow forces to insidiously work their way into our society and then to deconstruct that Constitution for which so much blood was spilled, then we are desecrating the contribution these honorable citizens have made over all these decades. I personally am not going to sit by without doing whatever I can do to stop that. That’s why I sit back, monitor the situation, identify the people who have been willing to courageously come out and put their name on the line, fight the good cause, fight for our Constitution, fight for God and country. I try to communicate with people whom I think I might be able to help; I try to show them who I am; I have a public presence; I have a Facebook page, and I show what my beliefs are. I show that I believe in God and our Constitution; I believe in freedom; I believe in protecting the lives of unborn babies.

If I think I can help someone by setting up interviews or putting them in touch with an attorney or perhaps helping with funds, I ask them if a contact is somebody they may be interested in. If they say “yes,” then I’ll go ahead and try to make that contact, and I’ll try to explain to that contact who they are, what they’re trying to achieve, and how that contact may be able to help. That’s how I operate; it’s actually very simple. It’s very time-consuming and consumes your heart.

by Bridgette, blogging at WTPOTUS

(Mar. 25, 2011) — We recently reviewed Obama’s multiple Social Security numbers that investigators uncovered in the article “Whose Identity Did Obama Steal?”. Additionally, they found that he used different social security numbers within a couple of years of each other. Investigators associated social security numbers with addresses where he lived across the United States, and where he didn’t live. His most flagrant use of a card is one that wasn’t issued to him and that he is using today. Orly Taitz has uncovered new information that adds even more evidence proving Obama’s family, history, and integrity are seriously fraudulent. Lies about family associations, friends, college, travels, and work are being exposed with rapidity. The cards in question include his social security card, selective service card, and even his student report card! Evidence is mounting that his life is one of deceit, lies, and more lies.

Recent revelations are highlighted in Orly Taitz’s First Amended Complaint that was just filed. Below are the explosive allegations that were added to her amended lawsuit as well as the evidence to back up her allegations. (The entire lawsuit is available here).

Now it appears Obama lied about his attendance at Columbia! He was only there for 9 months NOT 2 years that he has stated! Where did he go for that other year and what was he doing? Was he taking courses in person at Columbia or was he enrolled in an overseas program? If he traveled overseas what name did he use? How did he get the credits to attend Harvard with only 9 months attendance at Columbia? Was it a Freudian slip when Obama said he went to Pakistan or is that one of the only truthful statements to come out of his mouth? Below if verification of Obama’s limited attendance at Columbia. Perhaps there will be apologies made to Dr. Manning?

Both of the photos below are Exhibits in Orly’s lawsuit. One is evidence garnered from the U.S. Government’s own Social Security Verification System. Obama’s social security number that he stole and uses was entered into the database. The results show ” FAIL”! This means that the number and his name do not match! The number was not issued to him! Obama, you have a major problem! Identity fraud comes to mind.

Let’s not forget that he also used the same social security number on the forged Selective Service Application. That is two counts! Shall we go for three?

Following are excerpts from her amended lawsuit.

Emphasis is mine.


26. In this First Amended Complaint Taitz provides additional information, specifically Exhibit 1 Selective Service Application for Barack Obama, showing that he uses SSN 042-68-4425 and Exhibit 2 SSNVS Social Security number Verification System, which shows that this is not a legally obtained Social Security number for Barack Obama. This is a prima facia evidence of Social Security fraud and Identity Fraud obtained from the official records of the United States Government, which coupled with the age of 121 years old of the original applicant (date of birth 1890) justify release of at least redacted SS-5 information requested, such as gender, race and age of the SS5 applicant for SSN 042-68-4425 and the zip code, where the original SSN card was mailed by the social Security administration. Concealment of such data will constitute aiding and abetting Social Security Fraud and Identity Theft.

27. Further records from the Student Clearing House show even more shocking evidence. In his memoirs and multiple speeches Obama wrote that he studied for two years at Columbia University September 1981-May 1983. He admitted that in summer of 1981 he traveled to Pakistan to visit his friends, but repeatedly claimed that from September 1981 until May of 1983 he resided in New York and studied at Columbia University. Taitz ran a check of his years of attendance at Columbia university and found out that Columbia official records show him attending Columbia university only for nine months September 1982-till May 1983 (Exhibit 3), which means that the President of the United States lied to the whole nation about his whereabouts for a whole year September 1981 until September 1982. One year absence is the best case scenario, as he could get his university credit by reciprocity or through extern studies.

28. As there is no record of Obama residing anywhere else in the United States from September 1981-September 1982, or attending any other university, by way of simple deduction it becomes clear that his visit to Pakistan lasted not a month or two, as he claims, but over a year.

29. In 1981-1982 Pakistan was ruled by a ruthless radical Muslim leader general Zia Ul Hac, who came to power as a result of a military coup, announced himself as a Chief Martial Law Administrator and ruled the country via the system of iron fist terror. Supreme court of Pakistan, apparently afraid for their lives found such rule to be acceptable due to a “necessity” doctrine. Based on verification of Columbia university records, Taitz found that Obama spent at least a year within the regime of general Zia Ul Hac. This revelation adds urgency in processing this complaint, as it shows that we have today an individual usurping the position of the President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of the whole US military, while using a stolen social security number, not possessing a valid long form U.S. birth certificate and defrauding the nation and concealing a whole year of his whereabouts.


Evidence is mounting against Barack Hussein Obama as not only a liar and the ultimate con-man, but a person who has perpetrated the biggest fraud in the history of the United States. Obama and his fellow globalists, supporters, and associates have perpetrated these crimes against the people in our nation and have duped people throughout the world. They have played their cards, and as the evidence mounts, this House of Cards will collapse. Card after card after card. There will be no Royal Flush.
Kudos once again for Orly Taitz’s tenacity and perseverance!

Patriots — it is time to send this information to your Senators and Representatives and DEMAND that they investigate! This is a national security issue! We must put the pressure on them to act! Their email addresses are in the Header at the top of the blog!

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Who is Barack Obama? - A Terrifying Analysis

Redacted from a speech by Dinesh D'Souza, President King's College, NYC, NY

By Jerome S. Kaufman

On March 15, 2011, the Heritage Foundation sponsored a telecast featuring Dinesh D'Souza, President of King's College New York and author of the best selling book, Roots of Obama's Rage. After introducing himself, D'Souza got right into an in-depth analysis of current US President Barack Obama. Obama is the product of an unusual family history, far different from most Americans or people anywhere, for that matter. To say Obama is the product of his parentage and previous environment is a gross understatement.

D'Souza first described his own difficulty understanding Obama. Who did Obama represent, what were his ambitions, his goals, his mind set, etc.? D'Souza concluded that Obama was a different leader from previous Democrats - especially different from so-called liberals like Jimmy Carter, Michael Dukakis, Bill Clinton.

There are a host of theories trying to explain Obama. By the Right he has many different designations - a Progressive, a conventional Liberal, a Socialist, a Muslim, not born an American, an alien. But, all of these javelins bounce off Obama with no effect or just glancing blows. He continues to act in apparently mysterious ways - not easily explained. If he were truly a Socialist he would have tried to command the means of production. But, Obama did not nationalize banks but rather infused capital to them. Another inconsistency: Recently banks wanted to pay back their government loan and get off the hook with the Obama administration. But, Obama did not want to take their money. Rather he insisted that the bank undergo some sort of stress test before allowing them off the hook? Why?

There are claims that he is an environmentalist and simply acting out that role - banning vital oil drilling in America, limiting the production of coal, introducing and pouring billions into hair brain solutions like wind mills and sun energy which are far more expensive and will not supply anywhere near the energy required besides, requiring years to develop properly.

Others say he has been motivated by Al Gore's global warming theory. Gore asks for the use of less energy and a smaller carbon footprint to solve this debatable problem. However, Gore wants everyone in the world to cut back, not just the US. Obama does not care who conforms or not. Faster growing economies like China and India, far more responsible for future theoretical global warming, are ignored. Obama's thinking is thus, not that of a true environmentalist.

In addition, Obama is blocking oil drilling all over America and its coastline while, at the same time, encouraging oil drilling in Mexico. To add salt to our wounds, The US Export Import bank has given a two billion dollar loan guarantee to Brazil to do their own off shore drilling. But, the oil is not to go to us but to the Chinese!

Then, there is his inconsistent and apparently illogical approach to all our problems in the Middle East - one minute he is siding with the dictators of Egypt, Libya, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the next minute, making obligatory gestures of compassion to their long suffering populations. (Not to mention his dissing and enthusiastic participation in the dismantling of our only reliable ally in the Middle East, Israel jsk)

Other inane gestures: He somehow made the Muslims party to our space program praising them for their great contributions to its development - huh? He returned a bust of Winston Churchill given to us by the Brits that had been gratefully placed by us in the White House because of Churchill's crucial contribution to the defeat of Adolph Hitler in WWII.

D'Souza ended up concluding it was difficult accounting for all of Obama's apparent weirdness until D'Souza came to his own epiphany that Obama is not weird, foolish, inexperienced naive or any of the above. He knows exactly what he is doing and we had better stop misinterpreting and underestimating the man.

D'Sousa presented his conclusion combining these disparate facts in one impossible to refute hypothesis which negates all the previous theories we might have had. Obama is not Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton or just another American Black shake down artist. Obama has not really been raised American. His early years were in Kenya and then Indonesia. He was first thrust into American culture by his mother when he was already 10-12 years old.

Then, D'Sousa read Obama's book, Dreams from my Father. D'Sousa discovered that indeed, Obama has nothing to do with Black America. He never sat at a segregated lunch counter nor was he descended from slaves. His Dad was an educated immigrant from Kenya and his Mom was white from Kansas. His is not an American dream. He has no understanding or sympathy for American exceptionalism. In fact, he resents the concept.

So, what is Obama's dream? He tells us very explicitly that his dream is his father's dream. Obama Sr. was raised in Kenya. In his 20`s, he married a Black woman in Kezia, had two children by her, and while she was pregnant with the second, he left his family and went to Hawaii as a student. He there met Obama's Mom - Stanley Ann, married her and before Obama Jr. was age two also left her. He then went to Harvard where he took up with a third woman, took her back to Africa and had two children by her. At the same time he reunited with his first wife, from Kezia, and had two more children with her. In total he had four wives, usually two at the same time, and 8 children and with no sense of obligation and nor did he supply care for any of them.

Obama Sr. was a chronic alcoholic who had multiple driving accidents. He kills a man in one, in another hurts himself so badly his two legs have to be cut off and replaced with iron rods. Nevertheless, his courtship style remains intact. He takes up with another woman who bears his eighth child, George Obama.

In summary - he was quite an unusual role model for President Obama! Later, Obama Jr's sister took him to task and demanded how could he admire this despicable man who had abandoned all his wives and children, never gave them a dime or even paid them a visit. Obama Jr., in fact, barely knew him since his Dad had visited him only once, when he was about 10 years old. Consequently, Sr. had no direct influence upon Jr.

That influence was wielded by Obama Sr.'s first convert - Jr's mother, Stanley Ann Obama. Obama's mother was an only child. She grew up in Kansas and somehow became a bohemian rebel against her parents and her country. Despite her marriage and rapid abandonment by Obama's father, she refused to learn from her experience. She finds and marries another third world, anti-American guy, Lolo Satora, He was Indonesian and grew up under the colonial Dutch. Satora wooed Stanley Ann Obama with stories of Indonesian colonialism, married her and took her and her son, Jr. to live in Indonesia.

By a quirk of fate and bad luck for the American people, the Indonesian husband becomes more pro Western, pro American, and anti Communist. He signs up with an oil company and fights against Indonesian rebels in his own countryside. Ann then attacks him as a traitor to the greater cause and quickly sends Jr. back to Kansas to be raised by her parents and escape the pro-American thinking of the Indonesian husband. She remains in Indonesia the rest of her life.

Obama's father, Obama Sr.. was basically an anti-Colonialist - the dominant idea in the third world of the 20th Century. The simple core of this idea was that the world is divided into two - the colonizers or oppressors and the colonized or victims. The colonizers used to be Europe, Britain, France and now it is America in this line of thought. Furthermore, the rich got rich only by looting the colonized and even when they left, powerful economic forces remained in a position of exploitation. Banks, insurance and pharmaceutical companies, oil companies and anyone else that happens to make money are simply now the economic wing of colonialism still into exploitation. And, who to Barack Obama, Jr. is the lead elephant and current exploiter? Why we are, of course.

How is Obama to deal with us, the problem? First, bring us under the rod of the Federal government. Obama's father in 1965 wrote an article in an East African journal saying how this should be done. Bring down all the rich guys by the power of the state, confiscate their land, property, raise taxes as high as you want - 100% if necessary, and obtain their wealth through fiat and legislative piracy. The rationale is that the wealth is not rightfully theirs, in the first place, but had been ripped off from the poor .

That is Dinesh D'Souza's basic hypothesis. So, Obama far from being a multi-culture guy, far from being the first African American president, is actually the first anti-American, anti-colonialism president and driven by that mind-set!

Obama, like the naive would like to believe, is no buffoon, not inexperienced, not unworldly, not apolitical and not a mediocrity. He is a very clever but misdirected guy and out to do us all in. He is the most effective Democratic President since Lyndon Johnson. He has gotten more programs passed in the shortest time, by Democrat or Republican, since Reagan.

If he is to be voted out of office in 2012, Republicans will have to take the full measure of the man. They need a strong guy, perhaps a father figure, a person that appeals to the American public. It will be a very difficult election made more so by mindless, irresponsible media genuflections and the Obama useful idiots that may never see the awful danger that this man represents.

Jerome S. Kaufman, Editor

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Birthers and the 3 Card Monte
Editor: Republished with permission of The Post & Email.

by William Lolli, ©2011

(Mar. 15, 2011) — Back in 1975 I was stationed at Clark AB, Republic of the Philippines. When a new, wet-behind-the-ears Airman arrived from the States, the base had a protocol to prepare the “kids” to recognize and resist the dangers of living overseas. We received graphic briefings on the local bars, entanglements with hookers, dangerous social diseases, the black-marketing of American goods and the tricks gamblers and con-men would use to allure naive GIs.

One of those con-game schemes was the 3 Card Monte. In this game, a card shark would try to get the GI [the "Mark"] to bet on how well he can guess which of 3 shuffled cards is, say, the queen. With the use of planted assistants ["Shills"] in the fake crowd around the game, the “Mark” is made to believe that he can win. But he can’t and he doesn’t.
Efforts that Failed

In the past three years, the Birthers have come a long way. At first we started as single individuals, feeling and thinking that something about the shortcomings of information about the origins of Barack Obama was disturbing.

Time moved forward. The individual concerns grew into efforts to find the truth. Before long it became obvious that the press and politicians were not interested in Obama’s origins, much less any Constitutional eligibility issues. Across the US and still unknown to each other, the individuals began to form groups and those groups made inquiries. FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] requests were filed, representatives’ offices in state and federal governments were visited, letters were written. But the efforts yielded nothing.

When it became apparent that the stonewalling did not stop the inquiries, both the requesters and the deniers escalated the rhetoric and the actions taken: Those in the press and government that supported the denials of access to information called those seeking information “the Birthers” and labeled them as kooks. Those seeking information began to file lawsuits.

As with any movement that starts as a loose collection of individuals, the kooks did emerge, and the press took full advantage. But the message: “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” could not be shaken and took hold in the public lexicon. The public polls have shown over the past three years that numbers of people recognize that Obama was never vetted and that access to his history is still being denied.
Attempts at the Federal and State Levels

However, over the same period the “Birthers” were systematically locked out of every federal court district– not on merit– but on an expansion of the doctrine of Standing, which now through repeated precedent rulings has created a new, insurmountable barrier for citizens to hold any federal office-holder accountable for any national, Constitutional violation of law.

The efforts to obtain resolution through the various state court systems met with equal failure; but the lawsuits revealed that many states had weaknesses in their election laws that prohibited their Secretaries of State from possessing the investigative and enforcement powers necessary to uphold the Constitutional requirements of Article II, Section 1.

Thanks to the efforts of Barnett, Kreep, Keyes and others, CA Secretary of State Bowen actually won her case arguing that a writ of mandamus could not be enforced upon her [a legal order to force her do her job in validating a candidate] by citing the fact that California Election Code did not give her the power to do so. Other states’ Secretaries of State followed suit, making the same claim. Thus efforts at the state level also resulted in failure.
Other Efforts and the 2010 Change

More clever and original approaches were as equally unsuccessful, such as the Manning “trials” and the attempts to use legally arcane “presentments” to force the jurisprudential powers into action. Although valiantly destructive to his military career, the loss of Lt. Col. Lakin in courts martial was devastating in that it showed that even in a criminal case, access to evidence would be denied.

The new Republican wins in November 2010 have done little to change the situation. The political calculations have been tabulated: The government has decided that to question Obama’s credentials would be tantamount to opening Pandora’s Box—risking catastrophic political and economic damage if he is truly found ineligible.

So that leaves the movement asking the same question the public is asking: “Where’s the Birth Certificate?”
Now to the Birther 3 Card Monte:

The so-called blunder of Hawaiian Governor Abercrombie in January 2011 of publicly seeking a way to make Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate available to the public was no accident. Nor was the forced resignation of Dr. Neal Palafox, the well-respected physician Abercrombie had chosen to replace Chiyome Fukino.

Abercrombie floated a trial balloon. The press, the Birthers and WND all took the bait. The Dealer had “opened the gate” to the card game, and everybody rushed in. If there was a blunder, it was the initial appointment by Abercrombie of Palafox to the post.

It is my opinion that once Abercrombie found out that Palafax was a man of integrity, he had to go. Palafox would have ruined the game, revealing that the Dealer was a cheat. As it stands now, the entire Department of Health is left with no head, no accountability, and under the direct charge of department bureaucrats.

The setup for the 3 Card Monte is now in place for the 2012 election cycle:

As alluded earlier, Abercrombie is the Dealer. The missing card is the COLB Long Form Birth Certificate. The general public has become the Marks. And the naïve Birthers and the mainstream press are the Shills, egging-on the Dealer to flip the card over and show it to us.

And we will be shown, alright, at a time of the Dealer’s choosing in the 2012 election cycle as candidate Obama makes a big-splash, full-core press event of registering as a 2012 official candidate.

The Dealer will turn over the card and – what do you know—Obama was born in Hawaii after all.

Result: The Birthers are made to look like kooks again, the public dismisses the whole Birther story, Constitutional questions are ignored, the WND billboards come down, and Obama is up ten points in the polls.

How can this 3 Card Monte be stopped? The answer is simple: The Birther Movement must unite as quickly as possible to secure state laws requiring credential validation and investigative authority to as many states’ Secretaries of State as they can.

If the Obama crowd can, year after year, get dead people to vote in Chicago, then it is no big deal to submit as authentic a forged long form COLB.

Birthers need as many Secretaries of State as can be attained to be empowered with forensic investigative authority to determine the authenticity of any document submitted as genuine. Simply passing laws requiring a birth certificate be shown is not enough. There MUST be legal language giving power to validate the documentation in order to prevent the submission and acceptance of forged credentials.

Consider this: If laws such as these had been in place in 2008, the outcome of Keyes v Bowen would have been vastly different. CA Secretary of State Bowen would have been forced by law to do her job, and the truth would have become known about candidate Obama.

I fear this is the last stand for the Birthers. If we cannot enact these laws, then our efforts to get to the truth are finished.


William Lolli is a regular columnist for His latest columns with that publication can be found here and here. chose not to publish his series on the “Birthers” but granted permission for them to be published at The Post & Email. His bio can be found here.

Friday, March 11, 2011

The Itch That’s Destroying America
Editor: Republished with permission of The Post & Email.

by Joan Swirsky, ©2011

Is George Soros directing Obama to take over major sectors of the economy?

(Mar. 11, 2011) — It’s a funny thing about itches…the more you scratch, the more you itch. This is because scratching floods your system with histamine, which causes – itching! Oh, you can get rid of the itching with an over-the-counter medication or go to the doctor for something stronger. But people with chronic itching conditions inevitably start to believe in Hell and that itching is among the worst punishments on earth.

My title alluded to an itch – one itch – but this is really about the chronic, relentless, agitating, but also motivating itches that affect the entire left and also Obama’s putative boss, George Soros.

Barack Obama’s itch started – if any part of his biography is to be believed – with the Marxists who raised and mentored him, inculcating in him bedrock leftist doctrines that include a deep loathing of America and its natural and glorious outgrowth, individual freedom.

Obama’s anti-Western itch continued during his schooling among Muslims in Indonesia, and was further inflamed by the far-left classmates he befriended in the American colleges he attended, with the religious leader whose anti-American and anti-Semitic “theology” he imbibed for over 20 years, and in the street-agitating career he chose as a community organizer.

In all cases, these influences provided Mr. Obama with ideas and philosophies that irritated his psyche and to this day provoke and agitate him. They also spur him on to scratch those infuriating itches!


Those irritants, those itches, include:

MOST AMERICANS – by any measure, the overwhelming majority – whom Obama has labeled “bitter” folks who cling to their guns and religion. Scratch, scratch, scratch.

AMERICA’S FOUNDING FATHERS – men like Washington, Adams, Hamilton, Jefferson, Franklin, et al – whose monumental accomplishments are diminished, in the Marxist mind, to the size of a pea, but whose few (albeit serious) flaws are magnified to the size of a mountain. Scratch, scratch, scratch.

THE U.S. CONSTITUTION and BILL OF RIGHTS, which laid the foundation for the freest, most successful, most generous nation in all of recorded history, but to the Progressive’s mentality, stop short of being perfectly “fair” to every entity from the delta smelt to the illegal alien. Scratch, scratch, scratch.

CAPITALISM – that surging engine of free markets, bountiful philanthropy, redeemer of poverty and misery, and the route to worldwide comfort and security – if only the world were capable of and smart enough to embrace it – is, to Leftist thinking, the root of all evil. Not that they, themselves, don’t lust for as much money as possible, the better to engage in conspicuous consumption and all matter of nouveau-riche indulgences. But hey, this is the condescending noblesse-oblige that always redounds to tasteless, classless, finger-wagging liberals. NOTE: Go to any search engine and type in Obama’s vacations – frequency and expenses…and you’ll see what I mean.

GOD – at least the God of Christians and Jews. It’s bizarre – and inaccurate – that in his 2009 speech in Turkey he declared that America is no longer a Christian country. According to a Pew study, nearly 80 percent of Americans are Christian, 1.6 percent Jews, and 0.6 percent Muslim. When he spoke at Georgetown University, Obama demanded that the symbol of Jesus be covered in black plywood. And have you noticed that when Obama refers to the Islamic prayer book, it is always “the Holy Koran,” but he never refers to the Jewish or Christian bibles as holy? As businessman and possible presidential contender Herman Cain has said: When the president, “on purpose,” leaves out of the Pledge of Allegiance the words “endowed by their Creator” – not once but three times! – “something is wrong.” Scratch, scratch, scratch.

JEWS. Obama’s pronouncement that “Israel is suspicious of me” because his middle name is Hussein is so phony and calculated that it makes even uniformed people wince. In fact, points out the huge number of antagonists to Israel who staff Obama’s offices. Again, the short list: Samantha Power, National Security Council’s Senior Director for Multilateral Affairs and Human Rights; Robert Malley, key foreign policy adviser; Zbigniew Brzezinski, foreign policy adviser; Rosa Brooks, adviser to the undersecretary of Defense for policy; Chuck Hagel, co-chair of the Intelligence Advisory Board…the list really does go on and on. Oops…didn’t mean to omit U.S. Representative to the cesspool on First Avenue (aka The United Nations) Susan Rice, who recently, as is her wont, threw Israel under the bus, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who recently stated that all of Israel’s settlements (meaning homes built by Israelis on Israeli land) were “illegal,” not to mention her own deep ties to Saudi money and ole Bill’s deep ties to Saudi money. Astonishingly, Israel-hater Michael Scheuer calls Obama both arrogant and racist. You can get the entire sordid list in Pamela Geller’s and Robert Spencer’s blockbuster book, The Post-American Presidency. One more thing: last week Kamal al-Halbawi became the first Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood leader to visit Tehran, where he promptly pronounced: “Every night when I go to bed, I pray to wake up the next day to see Israel is wiped off the map.” Reaction from Obama and sidekicks: a deafening silence, which is not at all surprising given that Obama has appointed members of the Muslim Brotherhood to key posts in his “administration.” Claw, claw, claw.

RACISM, which Obama sees wherever he looks, even when it’s not there! But this subject is clearly the driving force of his life, and the issue he is determined not to solve but to exact revenge for what he perceives – thanks to over five decades of Marxist indoctrination – as a simple formula: whitey = bad; people of color = good. Claw, claw, claw.

Yes, every time these issues flicker across Obama’s consciousness, his rage quotient increases. It doesn’t matter how many years elapse in which progress takes place, the rage still grows, which is how leftists react whenever their unrealistic, utopian dreams are not actualized. That rage acts like an unreachable itch, the kind that makes you tear at your skin until it bleeds, but without success. The itch remains.


To understand the intractability of the left’s chronic itching condition, it’s helpful to appreciate what drives them. Leftists are utopia-driven fantasists, basically fixated children who derive their dewy-eyed inspiration from the Communist-Manifesto-embracing lyrics of John Lennon’s “Imagine” (“imagine there’s no countries…no religion too…no possessions…imagine all the people living for today.”)

When the grown-ups among us disagree with them, leftists more often than not refuse to debate the issues based on objective reality or empirical fact, but instead hurl gratuitous insults, call names, and resort to that old psychological stand-by, projection; in other words, blaming other people for the very words and actions they, themselves, say and do.

For instance, when Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords got shot in the head, the left blamed the tragedy on the “incivility” of conservatives while studiously ignoring the non-stop rudeness and crudeness emanating from their own ranks, including this gem, where a union intellectual (just kidding) threatens to break a tea-partier’s neck.

If anyone throws a paper napkin out the window or dares to suggest we drill for oil, leftists castigate them for polluting the environment, while they consistently defile every event they attend by leaving mountains of trash that costs millions to clean up; for instance, the 2008 “presidential” inauguration, their rally at the Lincoln Memorial in 2010, and now the temper-tantrum demonstrations at the State House in Wisconsin. Makes you wonder what kinds of homes these disrespectful slobs are raised in!

Syndicated columnist David Limbaugh has documented numerous examples of how Obama – the so-called post-racial “president” – uses projection (among other mechanisms) to address issues of race. We can skip Obama calling his grandmother “a typical white person” and accusing the Cambridge, MA, police department of “acting stupidly” when they arrested his pal, Harvard Professor Henry Gates..that is old news. But here is the short list:

* Appointing Eric Holder as Attorney General, a man who has accused Americans of being “a nation of cowards” when it comes to race. Holder also dismissed a case against New Black Panther Party members for voter intimidation even though it had already been won, prompting former Justice lawyer, J. Christian Adams, to say that the case was dismissed based on the Justice Department’s policy of not prosecuting such cases against blacks when they involve white victims. Holder explained his racist decisions before a House Appropriations subcommittee last week by admitting they were biased toward “my people.” And all this time I thought that the Attorney General’s “people” were all Americans and not his own hand-picked subset.
* Holder’s Justice Department – in both a racist and patronizing decision – also overruled a judgment to do away with party affiliation of candidates in local elections by the city of Kinston, N.C., insisting that black voters could not achieve civil rights without the Democrat Party.
* Just a year ago this month, the Obama regime filed a brief that supported racial preferences in university admissions. Now just how racist and patronizing and insulting can you get? How does Obama think the recipients of this largesse feel when they know their admissions have nothing to do with merit?
* Unrelated but equally if not more egregious is Holder’s Justice Department – no doubt at the behest of his boss – ignoring the rulings of two federal judges, one on the issue of offshore drilling (for which the Obama “administration” has been held in contempt), and the other on Obamacare – in essence spitting on both the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Constitution – two institutions revered by the American public but clearly reviled by the current occupant of the White House.


Hard leftists like Obama comprise a negligible percentage of our electorate, but because they’ve all studied the Marxist Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals – or what writer James Lewis calls Rules for Psychopaths – they have memorized Rule #1: Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.

Lewis writes that Alinsky “called ordinary Americans `the enemy,’” writing in his book that “radicals have contemptuously rejected the values and way of life of the middle class…stigmatized it as materialistic, decadent, bourgeois, degenerate, imperialistic, war-mongering, brutalized and corrupt…They are right…”

Hello, all you middle-class people out there who voted for Obama, the Alinsky acolyte! Now you know why gas is getting more unaffordable every day, why inflation has reduced your purchases at the supermarket to beans and pasta, why your medical care is ten times worse than it was only two years ago, why you fear that your aging parents will be death-paneled by the nightmare of Obamacare, why your quality of life has devolved steadily since 2008. (By the way, for 50 straight weeks, the majority of Americans has supported repeal of this socialized-medicine scheme).

Is it not obvious by now that it’s the middle class this cabal of Marxists is targeting for extinction?!

But what fuels the kind of rage that targets the backbone of our country, the middle-class men and women who work hard every day, sacrifice for their families, pay their bills and their sky-high taxes, believe in God, and love America?

What kind of rage motivates anyone to try to cripple and ultimately destroy the middle class, with the ultimate goal of making the entire country – except for the few oligarchs at the very top – dependent on government handouts?

It’s the rage of failure – utter, abject, measurable, decades-long failure.


Think about it. The left invented the welfare system, which, until it was overturned in 1994 by Republicans, destroyed black families, condemning generations of young people to grow up without fathers in their homes, which in turn resulted in millions of young men who might otherwise have enjoyed the bounty of the American Dream ending up uneducated, unemployed, in prison, or dead.

But liberals didn’t give up. In their unending quest to create dependency and suffocate independence – the better to maintain power and control over their straggling flock – they insisted that tax-paying citizens throw more and more and more and more money at the problems they created, as we know, to no avail.

The left also touted public education, again suggesting that the consistent, across-the-board failures it produced were products not of bad teaching or left-wing curricula but of – ta-da! – not enough money! So again they asked taxpayers to fund their failures with more and more and more and more money, but again to no avail.

In light of the crashing and tragic failures of these and other social experiments, the left thought up Affirmative Action to make the admission process for both schools and jobs “fair.” Then they thought up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to make access to home-ownership “fair.”

Black conservatives have known for decades that these community-annihilating schemes were fraudulent and immoral, but just as today, they were given little air time or print space for their views and were consistently eclipsed by a largely leftist media. Erik Rush, the author of Negrophilia: From Slave Blocks to Pedestal ~ America’s Racial Obsession, explains that “Black conservatism threatens the pre-eminence and perceptual validity of [the media’s] ideology. If the Democratic Party loses a substantial portion of the black vote, they’re done for – and they know it. When conservatives of color – black and otherwise – are unleashed, they will quickly become as ubiquitous as in other areas of endeavor. The result, however, will be a death blow to progressivism in America.”

In short, everything the left has tried to make things fairer for minority communities, to up their success quotient, has met with thundering failure, just as every leftist hero they glorify – in their Communist/Socialist/Maoist/Marxist/Leninist firmament – has failed.

That’s where their rage comes from. It’s the rage of failure. And then the unquenchable thirst – the unscratchable itch – for revenge. And that’s what we’re witnessing today, a veritable rampage of revenge on the successful middle class, on successful capitalism, on successful America.

It is these successes that the angry, vengeful left – Obama and his fulminating minions – resent and are working overtime to destroy. Instead of using the brains and energy God gave them to rethink their misguided direction, they have dug in deep, which I guess is understandable, given that a change of mind and heart would mean to them that everything they’ve believed their entire lives is dead wrong.

The problem with megalomaniacal, narcissistic, autocratic personalities is that just beneath the bluster is an eggshell-like fragility, which is why if you tap them on the shoulder, they explode. If you challenge one of their policies, they lash out. If you take legal, Constitutional steps to overturn the essentially Communistic legislation they’ve rammed through Congress, they devolve into street-fighting thugs.

The next time you see or hear a leftist holding forth, imagine the intractable, insanity-producing itching that’s going on inside of him or her. Picture the internal inflammation, the redness, the cascade of histamine that’s making the itching worse. It is this torturing condition that makes leftists so chronically dissatisfied, such doomsday addicts and incurable scratchaholics. If you itched like they do, you too would also be constantly on the borderline of insanity.


When Sarah Palin burst on the national scene in 2008, the left went into paroxysms of uncontrollable itching…even an armory of Prednisone would not have touched their out-of-control symptoms! They recognized Palin as a mortal threat and attacked her – and, to their shame, her children – relentlessly. The net result was that Palin’s popularity exploded and her influence grew exponentially as she directly influenced many of the races that resulted in the trouncing and bouncing of Democrats from Congress in the 2010 midterms.

When the Tea Party movement emerged in April 2008, the left again went into panic mode, summoning their equally-itching allies in the craven media to rail against and lie about those nervy advocates of small government and low taxes. The net result was drastic Democrat losses in the midterm elections.

When Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed the Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act (SB 1070) in April 2010, which required – according to federal law – that all illegal aliens carry registration documents, and also cracks down on those hiring or sheltering illegal aliens, the left broke their fingernails because the scratching got so bad. The net result is that Brewer won 55 percent of votes for her second term, dozens of states are seeking to emulate her actions, and she is now being mentioned for a cabinet position in a future Republican administration.

When Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker interpreted the mandate he received from the state’s voters to actually fulfill his campaign promises to rein in government spending and reduce the state’s massive deficit, the left lost it completely. So inflamed did they become that they abandoned all semblance of modesty and started scratching themselves with abandon in front of national and international cameras. The net result was that Governor Walker prevailed, thereby saving his state multimillions and starting on the road back to fiscal sanity.

When New York Congressman Peter King, Chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, instituted hearings on March 10th to explore the Islamic radicalization of American Muslims, the left bought thousands of forks so they could use them to scratch themselves silly while their fingernails grew back from the Gov. Walker itching attack. Dozens of individuals and groups citing bogus “discrimination” of Muslims came out in number, practically scratching their own eyes out in frustration. The net result is that King has remained undaunted and unintimidated, in spite of the death threats he has received. You can see his hearings on CSPAN3 or streamed live at

These are only five out of dozens if not hundreds of examples of the immensely successful push-back that Republicans, centrist Democrats, and Independents have achieved in spite of the frighteningly fascistic nature of the leftists in power.

There is no force quite as powerful as We the People of the United States of America, as our Armed Forces have proven in the wars we’ve fought and as the grassroots has proven since January 2008.

We can’t quit now! Our very country is at stake!