"President Barack Obama's long-form birth certificate released by the White House on April 27, 2011, is suspected to be a computer-generated forgery, not a scan of an original 1961 paper document as represented by the White House when the long-form birth certificate was made public," Arizona's Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio said at a press conference today in Phoenix.

This is the major preliminary finding of a six-month ongoing Sheriff's Cold Case Posse law enforcement investigation into the authenticity of Obama's birth certificate and his eligibility to be president.

Having developed probable cause to believe the long-form birth certificate was most likely a computer-generated forgery, investigators began examining other evidence of President Obama's life history.

Investigators additionally have developed credible evidence suggesting:

• President Obama's Selective Service card was most likely a forgery, revealed by an examination of the postal date stamp on the document;

• Records of Immigration and Naturalization Service cards filled out by airplane passengers arriving on international flights originating outside the United States in the month of August 1961, examined at the National Archives in Washington, D.C., are missing records for the week of President Obama's birth, including the dates Aug. 1, 1961 through Aug. 7, 1961.

Beginning in October 2011, the Sheriff's Cold Case Posse, consisting of former law enforcement officers and lawyers with law enforcement experience, examined dozens of witnesses and hundreds of documents, as well as taking numerous sworn statements from witnesses around the world.

In August 2011, 250 members of the Surprise, Arizona, Tea Party, residents of Maricopa County, presented a signed petition asking Sheriff Arpaio to undertake the investigation.

The Tea Party members petitioned under the premise that if a forged birth certificate was utilized to obtain a position for Barack Obama on the 2012 Arizona presidential ballot, their rights as Maricopa County voters could be compromised.

The Cold Case investigators further determined that the Hawaii Department of Health has engaged in what Sheriff's investigators believe is a systematic effort to hide from public inspection whatever original 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may have in their possession.

"Officers of the Hawaii Department of Health and various elected Hawaiian public officials may have intentionally obscured 1961 birth records and procedures, to avoid having to release to public inspection and to the examination of court-authorized forensic examiners any original Obama 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may or may not have," said Mike Zullo, the lead investigator in Sheriff Arpaio's Cold Case Posse.

The Cold Case investigators have not yet determined who, when, or precisely how the long-form computer-generated birth certificate released on April 27 may have been forged, but investigators say the evidence contained in the computer-generated PDF file released by the White House as well as important deficiencies in the Hawaii process of certifying the long-form birth certificate establish probable cause that a forgery has been committed.

The Cold Case Posse investigators advised Sheriff Arpaio that the forgers most likely committed two crimes: first, in fraudulently creating a forgery that the White House characterized, knowingly or unknowingly, as an officially produced governmental birth record; and second, in fraudulently presenting to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large a forgery the White House represented as "proof positive" of President Obama's authentic 1961 Hawaii long-form birth certificate.

"A continuing investigation is needed to identify the identity of the person or persons involved in creating the alleged birth certificate forgery, and to determine who, if anyone, in the White House or the state of Hawaii may have authorized the forgery," Arpaio said.

Among the evidence released at the press conference were five videos the Cold Case Posse produced to demonstrate why the Obama long-form birth certificate is suspected to be a computer-generated forgery.

The videos consisted of step-by-step computer demonstrations using a control document.

The videos were designed to display the testing used by the investigators to examine various claims made by supporters of the April 27 document.

The videos illustrate point-by-point the investigators' conclusion that the features and anomalies observed on the Obama long-form birth certificate were inconsistent with features produced when a paper document is scanned, even if the scan of the paper document had been enhanced by Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and optimized.

Additionally, the videos demonstrated that the Hawaii Department of Health Registrar's name stamp and the Registrar's date stamp were computer-generated images imported into an electronic document, as opposed to actual rubber stamp imprints inked by hand or machine onto a paper document.

"That we were able to cast reasonable suspicions on the authenticity of the Registrar stamps was especially disturbing, since these stamp imprints are designed to provide government authentication to the document itself," Zullo said, stressing that if the Registrar stamps are forgeries, the document itself is likely a forgery.

The investigators also chronicled a series of inconsistent and misleading representations that various Hawaii government officials have made over the past five years regarding what, if any, original birth records are held by the Hawaii Department of Health.

"As I said at the beginning of the investigation," Arpaio said, "the president can put all this to rest quite easily. All he has to do is demand the Hawaii Department of Health release to the American public and to a panel of certified court-authorized forensic examiners all original 1961 paper, microfilm, and computer birth records the Hawaii Department of Health has in its possession."

Arpaio further stressed the Hawaii Department of Health needs to provide, as part of the full disclosure, evidence regarding the chain of custody of all Obama birth records, including paper, microfilm, and electronic records, in order to eliminate the possibility that a forger or forgers may have tampered with the birth records.

Arpaio went on to say the President should also authorize Kapiolani Hospital, the birth hospital listed on the Obama long-form birth certificate, to release any and all hospital patient records for Stanley Ann Dunham Obama, his mother, and for the newly born Barack Obama, in order to provide additional corroboration for the original 1961 birth records held in the Hawaii Department of Health vault.

"Absent the authentic Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other credible proof supporting the idea or belief that President Barack Obama was born in Hawaii, as he and the White House have consistently asserted," Zullo said.

"In fact, absent the authentication of Hawaii Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other proof he was born anywhere within the United States."

Arpaio concluded the press conference by suggesting a congressional investigation might be warranted and asked that any other law enforcement agency with information referencing this investigation be forwarded to his office.

No to NDAA and its Enforcement and No to Forced RFID Chips in Your Body
IS A DICTATORSHIP ALREADY UPON US?

by Dr. Laurie Roth, ©2012, Presidential Candidate

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

At the last meeting of the German Reichstag on March 23, 1933, Otto Wels was the only vocal objector to Hitler's Enabling Act, which ushered in the Nazi takeover of Germany

(Feb. 22, 2012) — History repeats itself again and again because most of us never learn how to confront evil in time to make a real difference. When we do recognize and attack evil, we forget the cost and the battle shortly thereafter. We become distracted with the pressures and diversions of life.

Evil is here and this is our chance to make a bold stand….not later.

America has been viciously assaulted and flipped off with the passing of the Obamacare bill, HR 3200, in March 2010 and the NDAA Bill signed into law Dec. 31st 2011. Both bills are completely unconstitutional, immoral, unethical, dangerous, intrusive, communistic and dictatorial. Any questions?
Obama Care – HR 3200 is unfolding its carnage now – forced RFID Chips

By March 23, 2013 we are all ordered to have RFID chips implanted into our bodies. Isn’t March 23rd an interesting day to force this by? It was March 23rd in 1933 that Hitler’s Enabling Act was voted into law, thus ending democracy and freedom in Germany. This RFID chip control scheme hides behind all the practical issues and terms….patient identification; health information to hold medical data; do patient surveys and hold records and billing information.

Do I even need to say this? Government has no right in our homes or IN our bodies. They can and do hide behind bastardized terrorist danger terms with the NDAA, health and medical records needs with forced RFID chips and invented crises as they go. It is the biggest cesspool of fantasies America has ever seen, coming at us with the Saul Alinsky gun barrels. Many of us will just take it.

Laurie, you are crazy. It is simply a national need to fight terror…wrong! It is simply a national need to organize our health care information and care…wrong! It is simply Obama’s best efforts to serve the country and solve some challenges…wrong and wrong!

Do you see it yet? Obama and his regime have activated at least 72 FEMA camps, will soon have a nation of submissive and gullible Americans submitting to forced chips in their bodies and national health care cards. Obamacare is the IRS-controlled tool to gain access and power over our bank accounts and use our health information for whatever political agenda and attack is planned at the time. Forget privacy. Forget safe and effective health care and forget timely health care. We will all be manipulated and forced to pay for abortions and care for illegal aliens. We will see forced end-of-life counseling for seniors and forced salaries for doctors.

As you are being turned into obedient, robotic widgets with your chip in your arm, the Obama ‘change’ for America will almost be complete. Smart Grid will control energy and electricity use in our homes; RFID chips will control our health, accounts and behavior; FEMA camps will attempt to control those of us who defy Obama and his minions while we are legally seized and taken there by our own military.

The battle is on. The election cycle is in our face between now and November 2012. Join me and draw a line in the sand and say NO to forced RFID chips and NO to any part of the NDAA bill or its UN-Constitutional enforcement. Keep your guns and buy more. Get to know your Sheriff and join your local Tea Party group or start one yourself. Go to: www.teaparty.org for more. Make your stand.

Join me and don’t just vote our country back, DEMAND our country and freedom back. Say no to RFID chips and no to NDAA madness.

If you agree with me, help me, a patriot – outsider to get elected as your President in November 2012. I need volunteers and donations to gain traction, get on the ballot and make this work. I will clean house, kick butt and serve America, God and our Constitution if you give me the chance. www.laurieroth2012.com www.therothshow.com

Of Presidential Eligibility, Doubling Down and Linguistic Torts, Conclusion
A NATION OF LAWS, OR MEN?

by Joseph DeMaio, ©2012

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

The U.S. Congress convenes at the U.S. Capitol building, which is at the center of the legislative district of Washington, DC

(Feb. 26, 2012) — [Editor's Note: In this concluding section of Mr. DeMaio's four-part series on presidential eligibility, the meaning of "natural born Citizen" as utilized in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, and the efforts made by Atty. Jack Maskell of the Congressional Research Service (CRS) to convince his presumed readership that a jus soli birth is sufficient to qualify for the presidency, DeMaio questions whether or not an image posted on the internet meets the "Best Evidence Rule" as prima facie evidence of Obama's birth as well as Obama's reasons for withholding the original allegedly retrieved by his lawyer from Hawaii. DeMaio raises the question as to how Obama legitimately claims "undivided allegiance" to the United States when his father was born a British subject and never became a U.S. citizen following his extensive analysis of the writings of Emmerich de Vattel, whose The Law of Nations described children born of citizen "parents" as "natural born."

The Congressional Research Services states that it employs "450 policy analysts, attorneys and information professionals in a variety of disciplines working in one of five research divisions. The breadth and depth of this expertise – from law, economics and foreign affairs to defense and homeland security, public administration, education, health care, immigration, energy, environmental protection, science and technology – enables CRS to mobilize quickly, working together in flexible groups to provide integrated analyses of complex issues facing the Congress." But have these "professionals," or more specifically, Maskell and his staff, produced not one, but three, memos with the disingenuous intent of convincing members of Congress - and the public, if they were to read them - that Barack Hussein Obama is eligible to the presidency regardless of the "natural born Citizen" clause of the Constitution?]

—————————–

The CRSR relies throughout its 37,000 words on the English “common law” in support of its argument that, if a person was born “in” a country and “subject to its jurisdiction,” that person was a “natural born subject” of the King of England. Ergo, the Founders must have thought the same thing when they utilized the term “natural born Citizen” in the Constitution. Case closed.

Not so fast.

If reliance on the English “common law” by the CRSR is proper with respect to questions regarding the meaning of “natural born Citizen,” similar reliance on other facets of the “common law” should be equally applicable. While the CRSR seeks to “evade” the evidentiary principle of the “Best Evidence Rule” by approving the inferior mechanism of first posting by the White House to the Internet (in June 2008) an image of Mr. Obama’s so-called “short form certificate” and then, in April 2011, similarly posting his so-called “long form birth certificate.” Both posted images have been roundly denounced by computer forensic experts as being Adobe Photo-shopped frauds, and poorly-executed ones at that. As another website interested in seeking the truth has asked: “Where’s the Birth Certificate?”

Turning to the tome relied upon by the CRSR for its expositions of the “common law” – Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England – we find in Book III, Ch. 23 at p. 368, dealing with evidentiary principles with respect to “Private Wrongs” the following:

“AGAIN; evidence in the trial by jury is of two kinds, either that which is given in proof, or that which the jury may receive by their own private knowledge. The former, or proofs, (to which in common speech the name of evidence is usually confined) are either written, or parol, that is, by word of mouth. Written proofs, or evidence, are, 1. Records, and 2. Ancient deeds of thirty years standing, which prove themselves; but 3. Modern deeds, and 4. Other writings, must be attested and verified by parol evidence of witnesses. And the one general rule that runs through all the doctrine of trials is this, that the best evidence the nature of the case will admit of shall always be required, if possible to be had; but, if not possible, then the best evidence that can be had shall be allowed. For if it be found that there is any better evidence existing than is produced, the very not producing it is a presumption that it would have detected some falsehood that at present is concealed.” (Emphasis added).

By continuing to assert that the image of a document posted to the internet and claimed to be the original of a birth certificate is all that is needed to settle the issue, the CRSR merely compounds its error and hypocrisy. That hypocrisy was unmasked here by analogy to one of the surrealist painter René Magritte’s most famous works: The Treachery of Images. Painted beneath the image of a brown pipe, in French, are the words: “Ceci n’est pas une pipe.” Translation: “This is not a pipe.” The truth is that in fact, the image is not a pipe but instead is a picture of a pipe. Magritte is reputed to have commented when asked about it: “Of course it is not a pipe. Just try filling it with tobacco.”

A fourth-grader – but apparently neither the mainstream media nor the Congressional Research Service – could see the analogy here: the electorate, the people as a whole and, indeed, the populations of the entire planet are being asked to accept… correction, told… that the Internet images of two documents purporting by their presenters to be “proof” that Mr. Obama was born “in” Honolulu, Hawaii as thus, “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States” and rendering him a “natural born Citizen” under Art. 2, Sec. 1, Cl. 5 of the Constitution, are all that is needed to confirm his constitutional eligibility and silence any opposing views.

Really? Raise your hand if you believe that you can take your laptop, iPhone or iPad down to the Passport Office, pull up an image of something you claim is your original birth certificate, and get a passport. Raise your hand if you think you can establish entitlement to Medicare or Social Security benefits in the same way.

If, in fact, two original seal-embossed original long-form birth certificates were obtained by Mr. Obama’s lawyer, Ms. Judith Corley, of the Perkins Coie law firm from the Hawaii Department of Health in April 2011, why have they not been made available for independent, forensic examination? The “press gaggle” display orchestrated by White House press flack Jay Carney and the “I-felt-the-raised-seal” assurance by NBC reporter Savannah Guthrie fall so far short of satisfying even the minimum standards of the Best Evidence Rule that, were he now alive, Sir William Blackstone would promptly die laughing.

And yet not only is the electorate lampooned for even thinking of snickering over the spectacle, Mr. Obama continues to pay his attorneys real money to resist any efforts to get a court of law to address the issue, and the Congressional Research Service continues to produce “product,” assuring everyone – and especially everyone in a position to ask really hard questions in the Congress – that there is no need for further inquiry.

Yet the questions remain:

Is the “raised seal” Ms. Guthrie assures us she “felt” from the Hawaii Department of Health, or might it be from some other Hawaiian governmental office, say, for example, the office of Governor Neil (“I ♥ Obama”) Abercrombie?
Has Governor Abercrombie (or another Hawaiian official) signed the additional certification required under 28 U.S.C. § 1739 for the purported “birth certificate” to be accorded “full faith and credit” under the Constitution, as discussed in the CRS Memo of March 18, 2010?
Do the purported “original” documents in the possession of Mr. Obama or his lawyers – there shielded by the attorney-client privilege – match the documents posted to the internet?
Was the request for the certified copies of the originals transmitted through Mr. Obama’s lawyers in order to interpose let another layer of secrecy – attorney-client confidentiality – over the documents once placed into the lawyers’ possession?
Has anyone in the federal “Office if the Inspector General” seen or examined the documents purporting to be “genuine” certified copies of the original Hawaii Department of Health birth records against the findings and recommendations of the September 2000 report of the Inspector General entitled “Birth Certificate Fraud” found here?
Does the original Hawaii Department of Health microfilm or microfiche chronological record of births taking place in 1961 explain or answer the “anomalies” present in Mr. Obama’s proffered “birth certificates” as compared to the then-contemporaneous certificates of other persons born in Honolulu that year?
If his father was a natural born British subject under the British Status of Aliens Act of 1914, and under British statutory as well as “common law” the children of such natural born British subjects, wherever born, are themselves natural born British subjects, what is the basis for Mr. Obama’s claim of the undivided allegiance to the United States required under the Constitution?
If the British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act of 1943 applied to Mr. Obama’s father, was Barack Hussein Obama’s purported Hawaiian birth ever “registered at a consulate of His Majesty” as contemplated under the Act?

The CRSR’s repeated claim that the Internet image, as opposed to the original, seal-embossed document claimed to have been supplied by Hawaii officials, suffices is absurd. The image does not satisfy either the federal law on “prima facie” evidence of a document nor does it satisfy the “Best Evidence Rule,” which (to quote one of the CRSR favorite authorities, Blackstone) has been a part of the common law since written documents were first proffered in evidence. Moreover, the CRSR reprises its misplaced reliance on Liacakos v. Kennedy, 195 F. Supp. 630 (D.D.C. 1961) (previously discussed and dismantled here, contending that “even a delayed birth certificate produced by the plaintiff, issued by the State of West Virginia 46 years after the alleged birth there, would provide prima facie evidence of “natural born citizenship.” See CRSR at 42.

Quite apart from the fact that Mr. Liacakos produced the original document and not an Internet image of the document, the decision, like the CRSR, improperly conflates and equates a “native born citizen” under the 14th Amendment to a “natural born Citizen” under Art. 2, Sec. 1, Cl. 5 of the Constitution. Accordingly, any and all discussion in the case regarding the presidential eligibility clause and/or the term “natural born Citizen” used therein is, as in Wong Kim Ark, dictum. Pure and simple.

Blackstone’s evidentiary rule is carried forward to today’s Rule 1002 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, requiring that: “To prove the content of a writing, recording or photograph, the original writing, recording or photograph is required, except as otherwise provided in these rules of by Act of Congress.” See, generally, McCormick on Evidence, § 233. Since no other evidentiary rule or act of Congress exists which would obviate the need for the original of the purported certified copy of Mr. Obama’s long-form birth certificate, including the raised certification seal, the April 27, 2011 Internet image, as well as the anemic CRSR attempt to validate it, are worthless to resolve the question. Worse, they are disingenuous efforts to camouflage the truth – whatever that truth may be – regarding all of the circumstances attending Mr. Obama’s birth.

Finally, the hypocrisy of the CRSR’s position that the Internet images should be all that is needed, because the “original” sealed certificates were obtained from the Hawaii Department of Health by Mr. Obama’s lawyers, is manifest. One need look no further than the principles of the “common law” as articulated by Blackstone above quoted: “…the one general rule that runs through all the doctrine of trials is this, that the best evidence the nature of the case will admit of shall always be required, if possible to be had.” (Emphasis added). The circumstance that the original birth certificates – if indeed they exist – are in the possession of Mr. Obama or his lawyers, but that they don’t want to disclose them, does not render them other than “possible to be had.”

More importantly to the Best Evidence Rule issue, however, are the words of Blackstone following those just quoted. “[I]f it be found that there is any better evidence existing than is produced, the very not producing it is a presumption that it would have detected some falsehood that at present is concealed.” Really? There is a potential that a “falsehood that at present is concealed” might be perpetrated by allowing into evidence something other than the genuine original of the document? Imagine that. Secreting away from evidentiary disclosure the original of a genuine document which one does not want to disclose cannot justify the substitution of a purported “copy.” Moreover, it raises the presumption that the person refusing to disclose the original in his/her possession does, in fact, have some falsehood concealed or some truth preferred kept secret.

It is important that one focus on the word “presumption,” as it has legal significance. Here, since the purported originals, certified and bearing the requisite seals, are known to be in the possession of Mr. Obama or his lawyers, it is those documents – not photocopies handed out a press conferences; not pictures of birth certificates posted to the Internet; and not parol (verbal) statements claiming to have “seen and touched the originals and the raised seal” – which alone will satisfy the Best Evidence Rule.

In any instance other than the present one, where the President of the United States of America or his lawyers were in possession of the original of a document which could, to a high degree of certainty, establish whether he/she was eligible to serve, or instead was a usurper, the mainstream media would be in 24/7 soprano apoplexy screaming for its release… especially if the President were a Republican. See, e.g., United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). Instead, the erstwhile “Fourth Estate” which has served the nation since before it was a nation seems to have come down with a terminal case of laryngitis. One wonders if there is anything in the behemoth known as “Obamacare” which might address the ailment.

Sad… very sad, indeed.

Why Now?

The nagging question of “why now?” continues to perplex. After all, if the series of prior CRS Memos, the successful marginalizing of the “birthers” by virtually all media outlets and journalists and the deepening sycophancy of Mr. Obama’s supporters have all combined to create the perception that, in fact, if you even dream of questioning Mr. Obama’s eligibility, you are a nut-case…. why is there a need now for yet another novelette on the topic, the November 14, 2011 CRSR? Stay with me, as what follows may qualify in some peoples’ eyes as “Area 51” material.

The timing of the release of the CRSR merits examination, as does the audience to which it may have been disseminated. Specifically, the release comes at a time when it is unlikely that the U.S. Supreme Court – even if otherwise inclined – would have time to accept jurisdiction over and render a decision on the constitutional eligibility issue before November 6, 2012, now less than 9 months away. Indeed, as previously noted, there is even a suggestion from sitting Associate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas that as to appeals drawing into question the president’s constitutional eligibility, the Court is “… evading that one.” It is interesting that Justice Thomas, in explaining why the Supreme Court has not yet taken up an “eligibility” case on the merits would select the term “evading” as opposed to “avoiding,” since the prior term suggests a conscious decision to shirk or avoid a known obligation.

In addition, however, it cannot (or should not) be ignored or forgotten that to the extent other individuals having presidential aspirations or being “rumored” as possessed of “presidential or vice-presidential timber” may also have eligibility issues impacting them – including Florida Senator Marco Rubio and/or Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal – the release of the CRSR might well have the effect, whether calculated or not is a separate question, of fortifying in those persons’ minds a belief that, in fact, they are constitutionally eligible as “natural born Citizens,” regardless of the citizenship of their parents at the times of their births. Such a scenario might also have the effect of cooling any ardor such persons might otherwise have to continue (or even begin) questioning Mr. Obama’s constitutional eligibility.

If the CRSR analysis is to be believed and accepted – as the CRSR seemingly wants the reader to do – then under the decision in Wong Kim Ark, Senator Rubio and Governor Jindal, among others, would be “deemed” eligible without the need for a Supreme Court decision or a constitutional amendment confirming same. If such a result found widespread appeal among such a persons’ supporters, it could have a significant impact on their willingness to persist in questioning Mr. Obama’s eligibility. On the other hand, if the original intent of the Founding Fathers as gleaned from sources dismissed or altogether ignored in the CRSR is found more to comport with the teachings of de Vattel and the apparent concerns of John Jay in writing to George Washington on the point, then Senator Rubio and Governor Jindal, as well as all others similarly-situated, and talented as they may be, would be ineligible, for they would not meet the definition of a “natural born Citizen,” at least as articulated by de Vattel.

Insidious and unlikely as it might seem, if one of the objectives of Mr. Obama’s supporters were to entice and tempt those in political parties other than his own – and perhaps even including Senators who might be called upon to voice any objections when the electoral college votes are tallied next January – to accept the CRSR and its reasoning in order to fortify their own proclivities or candidacies as a “natural born Citizen,” that would be an improper and unfortunate motivation. Indeed, such an objective, if the CRS were complicit, would reduce the Congressional Research Service into little more than a co-conspirator or lobbyist seeking to accomplish an objective through guile and cunning.

And that would be a bad thing…. would it not?
Conclusion

And so, he debate continues: is Barack Hussein Obama eligible – or ineligible and thus disqualified – to either serve as president or to be legitimately excluded from future election by virtue of the U.S. Constitution? While the person now “occupying” the White House marshals his supporters, enablers and lawyers to make sure the “response” to that question – not to be confused with an “answer” to the question – ratifies and confirms his continued residence there, substantial doubts and a growing mountain of evidence continue to accumulate indicating that, in fact and in law, not only is he ineligible under Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution,, a massive and unprecedented bamboozling of the American people, not just the electorate, has taken place. In fact, the ruse today continues to take place to ensure he stays there, including, at minimum, past November 6, 2012.

Aided and abetted by a mainstream media cabal that gives new meaning to the term “propaganda,” coupled with a somnambulant Congress seemingly more focused on individual members’ re-election than on adherence to the Constitution and rule of law, those who would have the temerity to even suggest that the issue of presidential eligibility should be examined have been relentlessly criticized, trivialized, marginalized, demonized, vilified and, finally, lampooned. And above it all wheels and dives Mr. Obama, not unlike a raptor scanning the ground – America – for more prey, his teleprompters locked and loaded. And yet, the constitutional eligibility issue remains. Why? Because one cannot rope-a-dope and dodge the public forever, because the truth will always come out. Always. In this regard, the U.S. Supreme Court may wish to revisit its not-infrequent citation to reports of the Congressional Research Service as a source of impartial and authoritative data.

The only remaining question of any relevance to the issue is whether enough of the electorate on November 6, 2012 will sip again Mr. Obama’s cocktail, a mixed adult beverage consisting of equal parts of hubris and arrogance, with a heaping dash of narcissism, and listen once more to his siren song of “hope and change” – along with another chorus of “it’s Bush’s fault” – to finally ensure that a nation once hailed as the planet’s last best hope for liberty and freedom crashes and burns like so many other failed nations of the past. Think “Yugoslavia.” Think “Greece.”

Since the judicial branch of the government – from the United States Supreme Court down to, for example, the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings – has shown approximately zero interest in addressing the issues on the merits, there is but one court remaining in which to seek redress, i.e., the Court of Public Opinion. There are times when the exigencies of a situation leave no option other than resort to the public: “we, the people.” If the Supreme Court is “evading” the issue, it is now up to the electorate to find the fortitude which apparently is lacking elsewhere.

Accordingly, assuming that these issues are not otherwise resolved before then, the final hearing on the matter will be held in that court on November 6, 2012. If you care about your country and its future, along with the future of your children, your grandchildren, and their great-great grandchildren, be in the courtroom – which is actually scattered across the nation in the form of tens of thousands of places called “voting booths” – on November 6, 2012. Unless, of course, either New Black Panther Party or SEIU “peaceful polling place monitors” intimidate you away or you actually prefer the “nation of men and not laws” that is being designed, assembled and imposed on Mr. Obama’s watch.

Yes, Virginia… it is that serious.

Obama Syndicate Plans Imminent Takeover of USA by Islam and Globalists
“THERE IS NO TIME LEFT”

by Sher Zieve, ©2012

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

A "Global Caliphate Conference" is scheduled in the Vienna, Austria area for March 10, 2012

(Feb. 26, 2012) — While Congress ignores it (or secretly supports it), the US courts continue to fall one by one towards accepting and utilizing Shari’a law in place of US law and the wholly-owned-by-the-totalitarian-Left-and/or-the-Saudis (same thing) media continue their mindless and largely irrelevant programming (to continue the mesmerizing of the American people) Obama is openly supporting and assisting the Islamist takeover of the USA. I have been writing about this since prior to the Obama syndicate’s usurpation of the White House. However, it’s comforting to know that my more well-known brethren have at last gotten the message and are now, also, writing about it. In the end, we are all in this together!

Recently, Senior Fellow for European Politics at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Soeren Kern wrote in his article “Caliphate Conference” Seeks to Islamize Europe, U.S.”: “The explicit aim of the Istanbul Process — currently backed by the Obama administration — is to make it an international crime to criticize Islam. A Muslim fundamentalist group is organizing a conference focused on turning Austria and other European countries into Islamic states.

“The “Caliphate Conference 2012″ will be held on March 10 in the Austrian town of Vösendorf, situated just south of Vienna. The main theme of the event will be “The Caliphate: The State Model of the Future.”

“The conference is being organized by Hizb ut-Tahrir [Party of Liberation], a pan-Islamic extremist group that seeks to establish a global Islamic state, or caliphate, ruled by Islamic Sharia law.”

Shortly thereafter, WND published the article “Planning for Islamic Caliphate Begins” in which it exposes a December 2011 Islamist Conference held in Washington, D.C.–also with support from Obama–at which Sec. of State Hillary Clinton spoke in favor of the Islamists’ plans to stop anti-Islam speech in the USA. The “Istanbul Process” (also SURPRISE–SURPRISE is supported by the U.N.) would deny anti-Islamic speech, only, and if any anti-Muslim/Islam speech leads to said Muslims rioting and pillaging (which is what they do on a regular basis, anyway) the speaker would be held liable, jailed or worse.

The above is happening now. Source it for yourselves or take a look at the references below. This would also be an excellent campaign strategy for Obama…jailing anyone who has spoken out against the Satanic Islamic cult. That’s most–if not all–of we Constitutionalists.

So, we have a dictatorial group now ruling–not governing–us which has destroyed our jobs and is in the process of destroying the employers who provide those jobs. It is also gutting our US Treasury, taking our money and spending it on the globalists, Islam and whatever other groups wanting and working with Obama to destroy what used to be our country. This same Obama syndicate has ordered military drills (aka “urban warfare”) in many of our cities including, but not limited to, Los Angeles, Miami, Boston and Little Rock, has ensured that gasoline and energy prices are reaching unprecedented highs (how better to immobilize a population?), is beginning its takeover of raising our children (did you see the articles about the Obama Food Police checking 4-6 year olds’ lunches) and Michelle Obama has even limited how large candy bars are allowed to be. And, there’s always ObamaCare–which is much…much more than healthcare–looming darkly over us. So many more tyrannical dictates have been commanded by Obama that it would take several books to include them all.

How much more will it take, America, for us to rise up against this massive onslaught? Are we doomed to slavery, poverty and early death at the hands of the most corrupt and evil oppressors in human history or will we actually get off our collective derriéres and fight them? By the way, there is no time left. Decisions must be now or never and may the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob be with us.

“And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every
man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.”–Gen 16:12

“And at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him: and the king of the north shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over” –Daniel 11:40

What Happened to the Mavericks?
AMERICA IS SUFFERING FROM A “DEBILITATING MINDSET”

by Ron Ewart, ©2012

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

(Feb. 26, 2012) — “The kind of people I look for to fill top management spots are the eager beavers, the mavericks. These are the guys who try to do more than they’re expected to do – they always reach.” — Lee Iacocca

The other day we took in the big-screen IMAC show called “The Rocky Mountain Express.“ It told of the story of building the Canadian Pacific Railroad across the interior mountain ranges of British Columbia and finding a pass through the virtually impenetrable Rocky Mountains. While watching this documentary, the viewers were treated to a spectacular steam engine trip across the Canadian Pacific Line from Vancouver to Superior. The film described how one man, William Cornelius Van Horne, son of an Illinois dirt farmer, rose in the ranks of railroading from the tender age of 14, when his formal schooling ceased, to become superintendents and general managers of emerging railroads in America. A powerful figure of a man, this accomplished artist, violinist, and dedicated railroad engineer was asked by the Canadian Pacific Railroad Company, at the young age of 39, in the year 1882, to direct the construction of the transcontinental link from the harbor at Vancouver, British Columbia to Thunder Bay on Lake Superior.

An imposing figure with the seeming energy of five men, the mind of a true visionary and the drive to get things done no matter what lay in his path, built a railroad line across the mountainous interior of British Columbia and up and over and down the Rocky Mountains and across the southern prairies and wetlands of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontareio. Literally carved out of the sides of granite mountains, with looping tunnels, long, curving wood-frame bridges and perilous overhangs, Van Horn directed the construction of a railroad bed that most said could not be done. He finished the line in half the time he was given to complete construction. In one year he directed the laying of over 500 miles of track. That is one and a third miles per day, every day. However, in some areas of the right-of-way, the contractors and workers couldn’t average more than five feet per day. In many of those areas, the death toll was as high as five men per mile.

An excellent biography of Van Horne can be found HERE.

The writer sums up Van Horne’s biography with the following: Sir William C. Van Horne liked big things: the largest and best locomotives, the biggest salary earned by a North American railway executive, generous (sometimes double) meals, big Cuban cigars, the massive Camagüey hotel, the huge gardens and broad roof of his beloved Covenhoven, the unusually large rooms and high ceilings of his Montreal home, the size of many of his own paintings and most cherished works of art, the grandeur of the Rocky Mountains and the CPR’s hotels, his visions of world-wide systems of commercial transportation and trading, and the greatness of the British empire. This passion for bigness, complemented by a usually keen eye for detail, was matched by exceptional energy, vision, and enthusiasm which made it possible for Van Horne to achieve or obtain many of the great things he so prized. His interests were numerous and varied, but construction of the CPR was his greatest contribution to Canada. As a railway man, he had many rivals. Others were more successful as financiers, promoters, and lobbyists, but none equaled his achievement in the building and operation of integrated systems of railway transportation and economic development, first in Canada and later in Cuba.

This was a time in North America where impossible things were accomplished by visionary men, cooperative governments and willing investors, who saw the opportunities for opening up entire continents to growing populations. Telegraph lines paralleled railroad right-of-ways, extending communication across vast expanses of open territory. Messages and news flew across the land almost at the speed of light, where before it could take months by sea, or overland by pony express or horse-drawn coaches. Towns were built up around the railroad lines to exploit almost limitless agricultural, mineral and timber resources to build our growing nations. Time to cross the continent was reduced from several months to weeks or even days and a lot less dangerous.

People from the East poured into the midlands, the mountains and finally the Pacific regions by the tens of thousands, anxious to take advantage of the many brand new opportunities that awaited them. They faced terrible hardships, injury, Indians, disease and death, but still they came and they came because of the courage, determination and vision of big men with big ideas. They came because of the mavericks who would not heel to the prevailing wisdom or the doubters, mavericks that opened up corridors of transportation and communication that were absolutely necessary for an expanding nation of free men and women. These railroads and telegraph lines were the arteries that carried the blood of commerce and the nerves of communication to the heart and soul of the North American continent.

During this time in our two great nations’ history, there were mavericks in finance, steel, agricultural, construction, mining, timber, sea-going sail and steamships, merchandise and a whole host of other commodities that were carried overland by the railroads. These mavericks became immensely wealthy because of the risks they took, the grand visions they held and the extraordinary determination to see those visions become reality.

In those mid to late years of the 19th century, America and Canada were the lands of the men who COULD and DID. These were the men of “YES, WE CAN” and they did IT in spite of civil wars, recessions, strikes, declining finances, bankruptcies, fickle governments, corrupt politicians, the vagaries of ebbing and flowing markets and a myriad of other problems that plagued them as they moved forward towards the realization of the goals they set for themselves and others. Government didn’t get in the way then, like it does now. None of what was done to build Canada and America could have been done in today’s regulatory climate. It would have been impossible. We have now become a nation of “NO, WE CAN’T” because of those laws and regulations. We can’t even build a pipeline across the heart of America because of irrational environmental concerns and the corruption of party politics.

These fearless mavericks of the 1800′s were the leaders of men and others followed them because these men were going places and if you hung on tight, you might just go places too. Fortunes were made (and lost), not only by the builders of railroads, but by those that followed the railroads and set up shop along these two parallel ribbons of shiny steel that spanned a continent from sea to shining sea, steel that was forged in the great northern cities, cities that were built by other great men with vision.

Most of these mavericks were self-made and determined, if nothing else, as was William Van Horne. Many were ruthless without regard for human life and some were pure evil. They only saw their vision. They never saw the obstacles. They just rode over them because the pursuit of their vision blinded them to all of their obstacles. There was always away around the obstacles and if they couldn’t find a way, they would invent one. Many others died because of the visions of these determined men, but without those sacrifices, realizing these absolutely essential grand visions of transportation and communication corridors would probably have been impossible.

In retrospect, neither of our two nations could have grown at the pace we did, without such men. Both countries would have been stuck in a time warp, where there would have been no fortunes made, no large middle class, poverty would have been the norm and the growth of freedom would have been virtually impossible. Man is anything but free, if he must endure a perpetual hungry stomach.

There were other great men who came along in the Twentieth Century, like Henry Ford who gave us thousands of jobs and the affordable car and expanded exponentially, the mobility of the people of a growing nation to travel great distances. Other men of vision obliged with a new source of once-thought limitless fuel, pumped out of deep holes in the ground at great risk ….. crude oil! Government responded appropriately to this new mode of transportation by building an ever-expanding network of roads within cities, from city to city and farm to markets.

Great inventors like Thomas Edison and Nikola Tesla gave us the light bulb and electricity to power our homes, factories and businesses. Advances in medicine extended our life times by several decades. War machines were invented that allowed us to be victorious in two world wars and smaller battles that some say we shouldn’t have fought in the first place. These new technologies and vast raw materials allowed America to build the most powerful military machine that ever existed on this planet and it still will be if Obama can be stopped from gutting it.

Technology literally exploded in the Twentieth Century. From the telephone, to radio, to television, to microwave relays, to computers, to cell phones, to laser beams, to satellites and to GPS, life in America and across the globe took on a pace never before seen in all of human history. The planet was dramatically shrinking, literally by the day. The dreamers and visionaries in this technological expansion are too many to name here.

But some of these powerful men who made vast fortunes from building corridors of steel and those that provided the raw and finished materials and the funding for those corridors, turned their visions towards another goal. Their grand vision was the creation of greater wealth and the control of money on a global scale. Men like Vanderbilt, Rockefeller, J. P. Morgan, Davison, Vanderflip, Warburg and others decided that they could use their wealth to control nations by becoming the central banker for those nations and in 1913, several of these powerful, wealthy men, from a plan they hatched in a so-called “duck hunt on Jekyll Island“ in 1910, were successful in creating the Federal Reserve of the United States, a privately held bank owned by a whose-who of the elite, that is neither federal nor a reserve. The debate over the Federal Reserve rages on, over it being unaccountable to anyone and whether its policies work in favor of the United States, or in favor of the private owners of the Federal Reserve itself. A recent audit of the Federal Reserve leaves great, unanswered questions in this regard.

But we digress! The question raised by this column is, “What Happened to the Mavericks?” Does America still have some individuals that will cross boundaries, tame frontiers and go where other men are afraid to go? Of course. But we have conquered the continents, we have discovered the passes through the mountains, tamed the frontiers and the wild, untapped land we once were. That wild land and that frontier no longer exist. All we can do now is still fill in the gaps. Thus, the great men that were called on to open up this new land are no longer needed. The frontiers we now face are totally different. The next frontiers we will challenge won’t require the rugged individuals of by gone years. It will require a collection of individuals and a wide array of skills, new technology and new materials. There will be no quintessential, go-it-alone John Wayne, who will design, develop, build and ride his new rocket ship into the sunset ….. to explore the awaiting heavens.

Nevertheless, there is a certain kind of maverick that is needed now more than ever. He is the leader of men and women who will fearlessly rush in to tear down political fences, break up cliques, challenge the prevailing wisdom, break a few rules and drive a wedge into the domain of the powerful elites ….. in the name of freedom. His words will make the heart beat faster and when he tells those that will walk in his path to take a stand for liberty, they will not hesitate to take that stand.

Throughout history, such men have risen in times of enormous strife, to lead others against a great challenge and throughout history those great challenges have been vanquished by such men and those that will follow. During all of our wars, in small skirmishes or major battles, these men have risen out of nowhere to lead others to victory.

But the challenges we face today are totally different from the challenges of the past. We are confronted not by a vengeful enemy determined to kill us, although there are some of those, we are now challenged nationally by a cultural mindset that is embedded in the hearts of millions of the people themselves, a debilitating mindset that was put there on purpose by a government and an ideology that is wholly contradictory to and in conflict with the principles of freedom and liberty. The maverick that will rise to meet this almost silent, insidious challenge will have to possess the ability to get the people to reject this mindset that has invaded their hearts and their minds, without them knowing it. This maverick will have to be able to do what a general does in the heat of battle, when defeat is staring them in the face. This general has to convince his men to overcome their worst fears and charge into an impenetrable wall of hell fire. This ability to lead men into situations where the men’s own well-being or survival is on the line is a rare quality indeed. But these mavericks do exist.

Are there such men in America today? Sure! But we have not seen such an individual materialize out of no where as yet, an individual that has that special ability to unite a nation and lead that nation in the direction of freedom. Nevertheless, “The Parallax Prophecies” predicts that there is such a man (or woman) and he or she was born many years ago. The life of this individual has conditioned him for this moment, to suddenly arise out of no where and lead this great nation in the same direction that led those colonials who fled to a new land and a new continent across a great sea in search of freedom and away from religious persecution, almost 400 years ago.

When we least expect it, this man will raise his two outstretched arms above the multitudes and call on them to make the sacrifices necessary to preserve, protect and defend our great Republic and become a nation of “YES, WE CAN” again, so help them God! This special individual is out there. Do you see him? Can you find him in the crowd? Not likely. You won’t have to look for him though because this maverick will be looking for you and calling you to duty. The question is, how many will answer his call, will it be enough and will it be in time?

But wait a minute! As anyone can easily see, the arrival of our mythical maverick is long overdue. The accelerating methods being used by government and national and international special interests to “mold” American society and our children, are both overt and covert. They are working diligently to get into our children’s heads ….. and their stomachs, at very young ages for the purposes of indoctrination. Read about just one such overt method coming from that arrogant, out-of-control U. S. Department of Education, under their “Race to the Top” program, from the “Education Liberty Watch” website.

Ladies and gentlemen, if you have children in public schools, especially pre-school and kindergarten, you need to get off your chair and derail this program before it gets a foothold in your community.

On second thought, perhaps we don’t need a mythical maverick after all. And the situation is so dire we don’t have time to wait for him to appear anyway. Perhaps all we really need is a bunch of concerned citizens and some angry parents to take back America at the local level. Perhaps what we really need are a few million go-it-alone mavericks that will take on these bullies and give them “what for.” Perhaps you are one of those good ‘Ole American rugged individualists, like John Wayne, that will set an example for others to follow. The time is one minute before midnight. Your country needs you.

Ron Ewart, President

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RURAL LANDOWNERS

P. O. Box 1031, Issaquah, WA 98027

425 837-5365 or 1 800 682-7848

If There is NO Constitution, There is NO Fed

“DERIVING THEIR JUST POWERS FROM THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED”

by JB Williams, ©2012

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Does the current federal government allow for "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?"

(Feb. 21, 2012) — Are Washington, DC politicians absolutely sure that they want to make the US Constitution null and void? If the US Constitution is null and void, then so is the union of states that it created, as that fragile union of sovereign states was very carefully ratified via a very specific and carefully crafted balance of power between the federal government and the states.

If the federal government continues to breach that compact without remedy, the union of states expires with the Constitution itself and it is every man for himself at that point. Are DC elitists ready for what comes with the decimation of the US Constitution and the union of states it created?

“We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

This is the sole purpose of the US Constitution. No constitution, no union…

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

The United States of America is a union of fifty sovereign states. That union is established by, and conditioned upon, the Law of the Land, the terms and conditions of the US Constitution. Without the US Constitution, there is no union of fifty sovereign states – there can be no United States of America. The people and the states have the right and the duty to protect and preserve liberty at all cost, and to force the Federal Government, if necessary, to live within Constitutional boundaries, or abolish this runaway government and start all over again.

Are corrupt DC elitists certain that they want to toy with the American people and the US Constitution, rendering the document nothing more than a relic from history and placing at risk the union of states it establishes?

The Federal commitment to Global Governance and UN Agenda 21 taken under the Clinton Administration in September of 2000 and followed by every administration since, is a direct violation of everything the US Constitution and fifty state constitutions stand for… it cannot be allowed to continue.

The 9th Amendment gives the people the right to reject unconstitutional acts by the Federal Government and the 10th Amendment gives the states the same power.

The notion that the Federal Government can make up the Law of the Land at will via executive, judicial or legislative fiat is insane on its face. The idea that the people are limited to the voting booth or a federal courtroom as their only remedy for a runaway federal government is equally insane.

If the 9th and 10th Amendments no longer stand, then the entire Constitution is null and void and the union of fifty sovereign states is also instantly voided. Before we dissolve this union and institute new government, laying its foundations upon that which will guarantee every citizen and state freedom and liberty, sovereignty and security, we must make every effort to save this union by re-establishing the balance of power at the foundation of the Constitution.

We shall not allow the US Constitution and the union it forms to perish without a fight.

Global Governance, my eye! The United States of America is ONE NATION, Under God, Indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for ALL. It is so, because the Declaration of Independence, the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights say so. Destroy that at the expense of the union itself!

Who are Bill Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama to say otherwise? Temporary residents of the people’s White House come and go. Freedom and Liberty are forever, because the American people say so and the American people are the final word on the subject.

State governments can stop the next Civil War by standing up and keeping their oath to respect, protect and preserve the US Constitution and force the Federal Government to live within the confines of that compact. They can do this by simply passing the Balance of Powers Act in their state and rejecting all “unconstitutional acts” of the federal government at the state line.

Or, they can sit on their hands, remain part of the problem and wait for the next Civil War to begin.

“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution;” – Article VI

According to Article VI of the US Constitution, every elected lawmaker and law enforcement officer in this country has the power and the duty to support, protect and defend the US Constitution and the Representative Republic it forms. No excuse from federal or state lawmakers or employees is good enough. It is time for true patriots to stand and be counted.

The Constitution prohibits any form of global governance, national or international dictatorship, or socialist experiment, be it democratically elected or not. The states must act or the people will have no peaceful alternatives.

Either way, freedom and liberty will be protected and preserved. The States can do it peacefully or the people will do it by whatever means necessary. The Second Amendment exists for just such an occasion.

Over the last 237 years, more than a million brave American men and women have fought and died for the US Constitution, our Representative Republic, freedom, liberty and justice for all. They did not die in vain.

The States can reassert proper constitutional balance of powers or the people will. It’s not a threat; it’s a prediction. Americans are the most peaceful and tolerant people on earth, until push becomes shove.

The clock is ticking…The States must act swiftly and decisively. Every patriotic American citizen must act as well, calling upon their state officials to take immediate measures to stop the runway Fed before we reach the point of no return.

Use the information linked in this column to become part of the solution. JOIN the real revolution to reinstate the US Constitution as the only Law of this Land.

Jb.uspu@gmail.com

Democrat Presidential Candidate Will Proceed with Eligibility Challenge Against Obama

CLAIMS “EXPLOSIVE” INFORMATION

by Sharon Rondeau

Cody Robert Judy is a Democrat Presidential candidate for 2012

(Feb. 21, 2012) — Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy has asked a Georgia court to allow him to proceed with a ballot challenge to Obama’s placement on that state’s ballot without an attorney.

Judy had been a plaintiff on a challenge filed by Atty. Orly Taitz in Farrar v. Obama, but last week, Georgia Superior Court Judge Cynthia Wright stated that Taitz would not be able to continue the case pro hac vice, meaning without the involvement of an attorney licensed in Georgia.

Judy told The Post & Email that he believes his motion contains “explosive” information which the court “will have to make a matter of record.” He also stated that as a Democrat contender for the presidential nomination, he possesses “competitive, legitimate standing” to challenge Obama’s eligibility. Judy reasons that “I’m a Democrat candidate against Obama. Republican candidates and Independent Candidates don’t even have their own parties’ nomination yet, the Court or a good lawyer would take that apart in a minute in the competitive standing argument.” A video produced by Judy about the Georgia ballot challenge is here.

Mr. Judy is a businessman and a published author who has previously run for U.S. Senate, U.S. House of Representatives, and President.

On September 3, 2008, before the presidential election, Judy had filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutional eligibility of both Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama. He was also a Friend of the Court in a case filed in federal court which was ultimately heard by Judge David O. Carter and dismissed.

On pages 5-6 of his filing with the Superior Court, Judy states, in part:

5) Mr. Judy is also the only candidate for President of the United States, in the United States of America at this time, that has a legal precedent and competitive standing in the contention of Barack Obama’s legal qualification as a natural born citizen since Mr. Judy is the only candidate who sued both Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama in 2008, as a Presidential Candidate, for not being qualified candidates under the qualification demands for President held in the vaults of the U.S. Constitution, and who has continued that contention as a candidate for President in 2012…

Judy told us that he has used the decision of a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to go forward with his ballot challenge. On May 2, Attys. Gary Kreep and Orly Taitz gave oral argument to three judges of the Ninth Circuit, who had appeared to indicate that the lawsuit was not filed at the proper time to challenge Obama’s eligibility. Obama’s attorney, David DeJute, appeared to agree when he stated, “I think a candidate can challenge the qualification of another candidate, assuming of course that candidate does so in a timely manner.”

Mr. Judy told The Post & Email that he plans to raise the matter of Senate Resolution 511, passed by the U.S. Senate on April 29, 2008, which declared John McCain a “natural born Citizen” with the assent of then-presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

An initial hearing took place in Atlanta, GA on January 26, 2012, after which Administrative Law Judge Michael Malihi ruled that the evidence presented was not “persuasive,” but a state case from Indiana which concluded that anyone simply born in the country was a “natural born Citizen” was persuasive. Malihi also opined that the evidence presented by six witnesses regarding alleged social security fraud and forgery was not persuasive. Malihi contended that his decision was “entirely based on the law.”

A challenge to Obama’s eligibility has recently been filed in Indiana. Other challenges to his candidacy have been filed in Missouri, New Hampshire, Illinois, California, New Mexico, New York, Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Texas.

In regard to his plan to move forward his eligibility challenge against Obama in Georgia, Judy stated, “I think it will be the first time a State Court has had the opportunity to consider all the evidence, with the requirements of ‘competitive standing’ and ‘political doctrine question’ answered for them, that normally get put into Federal Court.”