Before It's News | People Powered News

Friday, September 30, 2011

Republicans Cancel the Constitution


by Lawrence Sellin, ©2011

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of the Post & Email.

Will this document survive those who thirst for power, prestige and the status quo?

(Sep. 29, 2011) — Supporting and defending the Constitution and upholding the rule of law are no longer items on the Republican agenda.

According to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the Constitution and the Supreme Court binding precedent in Minor vs. Happersett (1874), Barack Hussein Obama has never been eligible to be President of the United States.

To hide his ineligibility, Obama has produced a forged Certificate of Live Birth, uses a Social Security number not issued to him and condoned the distribution of a forged Selective Service registration.

Despite being fully aware of the overwhelming evidence corroborating Obama’s guilt, the Republican leadership has ordered its Congress members to ignore constituents’ requests for investigations.

The Republican strategy is to use the Big Stall to cover up the Big Lie.

Political expediency, complicity and fear are the drivers for Republican malfeasance.

Like Democrats, Congressional Republicans consider the Constitution an inconvenient obstacle to their exercise of power. They have long wanted a “flexible” and “living” Constitution, which can be reinterpreted according to their own whims or adjusted to whatever political winds might be blowing at the moment.

For years both Democrats and Republicans have attempted through Constitutional amendments to dilute Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the Constitution, which requires candidates for President and Vice President to be natural born citizens, that is, US citizens born to citizen parents at the time of birth.

Up until 2008, all such efforts failed.

For example, on July 10, 2003, Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) proposed “an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to make eligible for the Office of President a person who has been a United States citizen for 20 years” (Senate Joint Resolution 15).

The measure was known as the Arnold Amendment because it would permit Austrian-born, naturalized citizen, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, then a rising Republican star, to become President.

A similar and ongoing example of political expediency at the expense of the Constitution is the promotion of Marco Rubio as the 2012 Republican Vice Presidential candidate. Unfortunately, like Obama and Schwarzenegger, Rubio is not eligible because he is not a natural born citizen; his parents were not US citizens at the time of his birth.

Having failed for years to amend the Constitution by legal means, the Democrats and Republicans grabbed the opportunity in 2008 to amend it through a backroom political deal.

The uncertainty about Senator John McCain’s eligibility for the Presidency was resolved in April 2008 by the bogus, non-binding Senate Resolution 511, co-sponsored by Obama, which declared McCain a natural born citizen.

The fact that Congress has no Constitutional authority to do such a thing was apparently completely irrelevant to that majestic body.

Having become complicit with the Democrats in violating the Constitution, the Republicans joined them in a deliberate campaign of disinformation and outright lies to hide their complicity, an effort which continues to this day.

It astonishes many Americans that, given the weight of evidence against Obama, none of the 535 members of Congress is willing to speak out.

Members of Congress are not leaders by any stretch of the imagination. They are frightened rabbits constantly sniffing the air for any scent of controversy that might endanger their comfortable lifestyles and lucrative pensions.

Once elected, the operative phrases are “don’t make waves” and “get along by going along.”

A “do nothing Congress” is, in fact, the status quo.

Serious issues are still decided behind closed doors by a small group of powerful and self-serving politicians owned by wealthy special interests.

The Republican leadership has already chosen the pursuit of power over upholding principles and political expediency over adhering to the Constitution.

If Obama is exposed before the 2012 election, it will not be the cowardly Republicans who do so, but the Democrats, who don’t want to go down with his sinking ship.

The country is facing the greatest Constitutional crisis since the Civil War, yet the Republicans do nothing.

If Congressional Republicans are not willing to fulfill even the most basic of public responsibilities, that is, to respect their oath of office to support and defend the Constitution, then what’s the point?

I see no reason to vote for any of them.

If the Republicans want to protect Obama and hide their complicity, while undermining the Constitution and the rule of law, then they can have him for a second term as their illegal President.

Sometimes it is better just to let a structure collapse and rebuild it, rather than try to maintain it on top of a rotten foundation.

Thursday, September 29, 2011

Don’t Ask – Obama’s Latest Costly Crisis


by JB Williams, ©2011

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Maj. Gen. Arthur St. Clair and Governor of the Northwest Territory led U.S. Army troops in a ravaging defeat by Indian and British forces. The battle is believed to have given rise to a more disciplined and effective army

(Sep. 29, 2011) — Amid the flurry of false propaganda surrounding Obama’s repeal of Clinton’s Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy concerning gay military service, the facts seem to be as distant as the solution to the crisis the policy creates within the U.S. Military.

To demonstrate the point, allow me to work backwards for a moment, beginning with the Washington Post announcement of December 18, 2010 – “The U.S. Senate voted 65-31 to repeal the Don’t Ask – Don’t Tell law, sending to Obama a bill to end the 17-year ban on gays serving openly in the military.”

First, Don’t Ask – Don’t Tell was never a law; it was a 1993 Executive Order by then-President Bill Clinton, who later called for the order to be reversed in 2003. The order did not make law, as the U.S. Constitution rests all law-making authority with Congress, not the Oval Office or some unelected federal judge.

Second, Clinton’s order did not create a 17-year ban on gays serving openly in the military. The ban on gay service in the military – open or otherwise – has existed since the establishment of our military and it still exists today, within the U.S. Code of Military Conduct, as affirmed by Congress in 1994.

Gay service is not the only conduct banned by military code. There are numerous conducts prohibited by military code and they all exist for a reason. The reasons for the ban on gay service are stated in the code under – TITLE 10 – ARMED FORCES – Subtitle A – General Military Law – PART II – PERSONNEL – CHAPTER 37 – GENERAL SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

(1) Section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the United

States commits exclusively to the Congress the powers to raise

and support armies, provide and maintain a Navy, and make rules

for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces.

(2) There is no constitutional right to serve in the armed


(5) The conduct of military operations requires members of the

armed forces to make extraordinary sacrifices, including the

ultimate sacrifice, in order to provide for the common defense.

Military life is fundamentally different from civilian life in that -

(A) the extraordinary responsibilities of the armed forces,

the unique conditions of military service, and the critical

role of unit cohesion, require that the military community,

while subject to civilian control, exist as a specialized

society; and

(B) the military society is characterized by its own laws,

rules, customs, and traditions, including numerous restrictions

on personal behavior, that would not be acceptable in civilian


(13) The prohibition against homosexual conduct is a

longstanding element of military law that continues to be

necessary in the unique circumstances of military service.

(14) The armed forces must maintain personnel policies that

exclude persons whose presence in the armed forces would create

an unacceptable risk to the armed forces’ high standards of

morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the

essence of military capability.

(15) The presence in the armed forces of persons who

demonstrate a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts

would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of

morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the

essence of military capability.

(b) Policy. – A member of the armed forces shall be separated

from the armed forces under regulations prescribed by the Secretary

of Defense if one or more of the following findings is made and

approved in accordance with procedures set forth in such


Bill Clinton’s 1993 Executive Order lacked the constitutional authority to alter U.S. Military Code. Although Don’t Ask was in practice, it was at no time in legal force. As a result, the 2010 repeal of Clinton’s order only eliminated an order which had no legal authority to begin with.

U.S. Military General Service Requirements, as defined by Military Code, remains as it has always existed – “The prohibition against homosexual conduct is a longstanding element of military law that continues to be necessary in the unique circumstances of military service.”

Military Code stands, despite all of the political wrangling over Clinton’s ill-conceived order and Obama’s repeal of that order. Nothing has changed in U.S. Military Code and only Congress has the constitutional authority to alter U.S. Military Code.

Congress has never altered official military code on the subject. They have only reversed Clinton’s Don’t Ask policy, which was never law to begin with, and was not the basis for the ban on gay service in the U.S. Military.

To make gay service in the U.S. Military legal, Congress would have to change Military Code, specifically, TITLE 10 – ARMED FORCES – Subtitle A – General Military Law – PART II – PERSONNEL – CHAPTER 37 – GENERAL SERVICE REQUIREMENTS. No such change has been made by congress.
Obama’s Latest Crisis

Clinton’s Executive Order created policy, not law. The policy did not make gay service in the military legal – it only told command not to ask and soldiers not to tell, circumventing military code with a lie by omission.

Obama’s repeal of Clinton’s order does not make gay service in the military legal – it only ended Clinton’s suggestion that soldiers lie on their application for service.

The U.S. Military is an all-volunteer defense force. As Congress pointed out in 1994, there is no constitutional right to serve in the military, therefore, there are no constitutional protections concerning race, religion or sexual preference.

When young men and women volunteered for military service, they did so under contract with the U.S. government, based on a certain specific set of standards and conditions. Clinton and Obama have violated those standards and conditions, placing the U.S. Government in direct breach of contract with every service member. Soldiers didn’t sign up for this…

If a service member objects, and refuses to serve beside homosexuals, they will NOT be Courts Martialed. They are instead being immediately discharged from service with full honors, upon request.

It is not Military Command or Congress who is causing the crisis. Two left-wing Presidents, Clinton and Obama, attempted to circumvent long-standing Military Law via Executive Orders. Neither had ever served in the military and both are known to loathe the military. Clinton dodged the draft and Obama failed to file his Selective Service papers. Both share an agenda for our military…

Both are attempting to destroy the military, turning the world’s most fearsome fighting force into some social experiment gone wrong.
A Matter of Life and Death, NOT Homophobia

The political left has labeled all opposition as a phobia of one sort or another. When you oppose Obama’s socialism, you are a racist. When you stand up for human life, you are anti-woman. When you oppose Islamic terrorism, you are an Islamophobe. And when you stand for Military Code – you are a homophobe.

But as civilian life on the college campus or Main Street USA is seldom described as an arena of life and death, homosexuals on the college campus or at your local Wal-Mart, is something very different from homosexuals in the next bunk, shower or foxhole.

Many homosexuals have served honorably and effectively in the military. This is not the issue…

The issue is Military Code and standards of conduct aimed at providing soldiers the greatest degree of safety and security, morale and cohesion while doing the nation’s dirty work, with life and limb hanging in the balance.
The Crisis

Because neither Clinton nor Obama directly addressed standing Military Code, the code remains intact, as it has existed much longer than 17 years. Homosexual service in the military is still a conduct punishable by Courts Martial, according to the manual and the UCMJ.

By trying to enforce executive political whims without altering code, they have placed both gay and heterosexual members of the military squarely in the line of fire of the UCMJ. Gays can be Courts Martialed for openly or quietly serving, and all other service members can and will be released from service with honors if they refuse to serve under the breech of Military Code and the contract they agreed to when they volunteered for service.

In typical leftist fashion, they have created another division, this time within the military.

Homosexuals represent less than 2% of service members, yet the other 98% have been forced into a position which is against standing Military Code and violates the agreement they signed when volunteering for service.

If the federal government wants to make gay service legal, they will have to change standing military code. Everything else they do is just a political tool of division, aimed at created a crisis within the armed forces.

This can’t end well… Clinton told gays to lie by omission and Obama has now reversed that order.

But until congress changes Military Code, every member of the military is caught in the crossfire of political stunts and this will not serve our soldiers well, any of them.

Last, so long as we have a usurper in the White House, illegitimate Command at the top of the Military chain of command, nothing can be legally or constitutionally altered, in the Military Code or anywhere else.


Editor’s Note: A U.S. Army memorandum dated September 20, 2011 states that the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell law is repealed” and is signed by a Sergeant Major, a General, and Secretary of the Army.

Sunday, September 25, 2011


by Miki Booth, ©2011

Front cover of Miki Booth's book due out about October 15

(Sep. 25, 2011) — Three years ago when I first heard of Barack Obama, I was pleased to know that a fellow Hawai’ian Islander was running for President. However, the more I learned about his radical connections the more I began to distrust him and soon I was outright afraid of him. But stronger than fear was my outrage at a system that would allow our Constitution, our rule of law to be trashed and put an anti-American, dual citizen of dubious background into the highest office of our country.

There were a lot of forces at play and we will never know the names of all the traitors responsible for the biggest political hoax in American history. But I know who Obama really is and my gut feelings are rarely wrong.

His roots are not of the Aloha Spirit that is Hawai’i. At his core is a mixture of Islam, atheism, communism, socialism, Marxism and every anti-American ideology that feeds his drive to destroy the greatest country in the world. To many Christians he is evil personified.

He’s a dope-smoking slacker that through his family contacts left Hawai’i for Occidental College to hook up with Marxist punks. He was recruited, along with other Muslim misfits, by CIA operatives under the auspices of Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, to go to Pakistan. His task was to facilitate the arming and funding of the mujahideen in Afghanistan to push back the Soviet invasion.

When Obama’s assignment in Pakistan concluded, Brzezinski continued to mold and nurture Obama for greater roles in the socialization and Islamization of the United States, for the ultimate goal of communism for America.

Whether Obama was given a new identity before, during or after his stint in Pakistan is anybody’s guess. But at some point he did acquire a new social security number starting with 042, the prefix for CT.

The number he had when he worked at Baskin Robbins on King Street in Honolulu, HI, which had to have had the prefix 575 or 576, (numbers reserved for Hawai’i residents) was then scrubbed from the social security databanks.

Through private investigators and skip-tracers associated with we learned about Obama’s Kenyan family members’ social security numbers issued around the same time as his. When Obama’s long-lost “Uncle Omar” was arrested for drunk driving he was exposed as an illegal alien but has a valid social security number. Digging deeper they found it was assigned in the late 1970’s as was a social security number for Obama’s half-aunt, Zeituni Onyango, who had also been issued a deportation order but was allowed to stay when she surfaced in government-subsidized housing collecting welfare in Boston, MA. Zeituni’s social security number begins with a prefix reserved for residents of Indiana but there is no evidence she ever lived or even visited the state.

Orly Taitz has brought many of the major lawsuits charging Obama’s ineligibility to serve as president since he does not meet the U.S. Constitution’s requirement of a “natural born Citizen.” In the most recent case, Federal Judge Royce Lamberth ruled against her latest attempt to get to the truth about Obama’s CT social security in the lawsuit Taitz vs. Astrue. “Today is not her lucky day,” wrote Lamberth. He concluded that there’s no real interest in determining whether the Obama Social Security Number is genuine or fraudulent, arguing that the need for privacy for the president trumps all else.

The news was devastating. Obama was above the law. I was horribly depressed and easily brought to tears. There would be no court case in Hawai’i for Loretta Fuddy, Director, Hawai’i Department of Health, to produce Obama’s birth certificate or show cause why she did not.

“Obama’s privacy trumps all else…” wrote Lamberth. I mulled over those words. “There’s no real interest in determining whether the Obama Social Security Number is genuine or fraudulent…”

How could he say,“no real interest?” I kept asking myself. That just boggled my mind. By now the number of Americans aware of Obama’s questionable social security number had grown exponentially.

On September 20, 2011, broke the story that G. Gordon Liddy, Talk-radio host and former Nixon White House operative, reported that one of his trusted informants in Hawai’i reported to him that while the document was forged recently, there may have been tampering with official Obama birth records as far back as 1978.

I knew, of course, from Dr. Jerome Corsi that his Hawai’i informants reported tampering in the Department of Health records weeks before April 27 as the forger(s) ramped up for the presentation of the fraudulent document. It was also an obvious preemptive strike against Dr. Corsi’s book, “Where’s the Birth Certificate.” But it was the date Liddy brought into focus that intrigued me 1978—The same period that Obama’s Kenyan relatives were issued their social security numbers and brought to the United States, albeit illegally.

Who can do this? It’s been clear to those of us who attended the CIA Columbia trial In Dr. James David Manning’s ATLAH church courtroom in Harlem in May 2010, that it was the CIA who “packaged” Obama, making him a U.S. citizen and “scrubbing” all mention of Barry Soetoro, Indonesian citizen, and all mention of his Kenyan birthplace.

The CIA “packaged” Obama with college credentials from Columbia and padded a résumé for him with his job at Business International Corporation, (described as ‘the left wing of the ruling class’ according to Wikipedia) and both institutions serve as CIA cover.

The ruling class is well aware of Obama’s true identity and every high ranking government and military official needs to keep the public from ever finding out the truth about them because they are all complicit in the coverup and the truth will destroy the Democrat Party and severely damage the establishment Republican Party membership.

For too long there have been those who accepted ‘slush fund’ money to keep their mouths shut and to expose their misdeeds now would ruin their elitist lifestyles and, of less importance to them, their reputations.

It is telling that when a secret meeting was held with Supreme Court Justices, Obama and Biden before the election, they did not invite Justice Samuel Anthony Alito. Perhaps we should take that to mean Alito is the only justice of the Supreme Court of the United States that cannot be bought. And what was the meeting about? Could they have been conspiring to make sure that the eligibility issue does not come before them and continue to ensure that the challenge is struck down in every lower court?

Well, we’re talking CIA and a matter of national security.

Republicans Complicit in Violation of U.S. Constitution

by Lynn Stuter, ©2011

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Will the RNC take any action against a usurper to the presidency?

(Sep. 23, 2011) — Like many of you, I recently received a “census” survey from the Republican National Committee. I learned, a long time ago, that the answers to surveys were found in the wording of the questions. In other words, survey participants are led to the wanted answer by the wording of the questions.

The survey was accompanied, of course, by the requisite request for money.

At first I was going to toss the whole thing. The RNC doesn’t really want to know what the American people think, ergo the survey set up to elicit the wanted responses, just the check enclosed – thank you very much.

Then I decided that since they had given me the opportunity to communicate with them, via a return postage-paid envelope, why should I miss the opportunity to tell them what I really think.

Thus, I wrote and sent the following letter to the RNC –

September 21, 2011

Republican National Committee

310 First Street SE

PO Box 96994

Washington, DC 20077-7556

Dear RNC,

Since you have been so gracious as to provide me the opportunity to share with you my thoughts on the current health of the United States, I have chosen to take you up on that, just not in the form of your choosing but of my choosing; surveys being so disingenuous in form and purpose.

You ask the #1 priority of the citizens of this country.

There is no greater priority, at this time, than the removal from the Oval Office of an individual who was ineligible to the office of president in the first place. Barack Hussein Obama was not eligible to the office of president when he declared his candidacy, he was not made eligible by the election of 2008, the certifying of that election by Congress in January 2009, or by his inauguration on 20 January 2009. He was, and remains, ineligible to the office of president. He is illegally, and in violation of the U.S. Constitution, remaining in that office.

Barack Hussein Obama does not meet the definition of natural born citizen as required by the U.S. Constitution, Article II, Clause 5. As affirmed by Minor vs Happersett, 88 US 162, natural born requires two American parents. This conforms with the definition of natural born upon which the Founding Fathers relied in writing this clause – Vatell’s Law of Nations, Section 212, which defines natural born as two citizen parents and born on the soil of the nation.

Whether Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii or somewhere else is, as you are all quite well aware, of no relevance. The fact that his father was a British subject, at the time of his birth, makes it very apparent that Barack Hussein Obama does not fall under the definition of natural born.

Every Republican, every Democrat, every Independent takes an oath of office to protect and defend the United States Constitution. Yet every Republican, every Democrat, and every Independent voted to certify the electoral college in January 2009, knowing full well that Obama was ineligible to the office of president, and therefore, was and remains an illegal president.

This refusal of elected officials to uphold their oaths of office, Republicans included, has resulted in a constitutional crisis in which money has been appropriated and spent, and laws have been passed and enforced, under the signature of an illegal executive officer holder.

In the same vein, American military forces have been ordered to areas of conflict and have suffered casualties as a result. As Barack Hussein Obama is not the legal president of this country, the deaths incurred as a result of his orders are nothing short of murder. Every Congressman and woman who has done nothing to address the illegal status of Obama is complicit in those murders.

The answer to constituents by Republican Congressmen and women has been a canned response, pointing the finger at the courts. And the courts have, in response, pointed the finger at Congress. And the issue of an illegal office holder in the White House and Oval Office has resulted in many Americans coming to the realization that the corruption in Washington, DC is not Democrats, Republicans or Independents; it’s everyone because this conspiracy to keep an illegally sitting official could not continue if the Republicans and Independents refused to go along with it.

It also makes a decided statement that the corruption is so deep, so widespread, so engrained in Washington, DC, that nothing short of removing every incumbent, cleaning out the den of thieves and reprobates now controlling the federal bureaucracy, repealing the last 100 years of mostly unconstitutional laws, and returning to the very limited form of government established by our United States Constitution is the only possible avenue to saving our nation from the destructive path currently being pursued by all concerned in Washington, DC.

You can call those of us who know that Obama is not the legal president of the United States whatever you want; you can scream racism at the tops of your voices; you can employ the help of the mainstream media in disseminating disinformation; you can pollute the air with volumes of irrelevant information; but none of this changes the fact that Obama is not eligible to the office of president; is not the legal president of the United States.

Under the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 10, it is the sworn duty of Congress to “define and punish … offences against the law of nations …” This makes it apparent that it is the sworn duty of the U.S. Congress to remove an ineligible, and therefore illegal, office holder from the White House and Oval Office.

Unless and until the Republicans in Congress take their oath of office seriously, there are a growing number of Americans who have no intention of returning Republican incumbents to Washington, DC.


/s/ Lynn M Stuter

It is long past time that the Republicans either uphold their oaths of office and remove an ineligible executive office holder or admit that they are just as much a part of the problem as are the Democrats, whom we already know are complicit.

Thursday, September 22, 2011

America is Being Attacked From Within


Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

September 22, 2011

Why will the media not discuss Obama's questionable eligibility for the presidency?

Dear Editor,

I do not understand how many news people and politicians in this country can claim that Obama is not disqualified to be President of the USA. It is so patently obvious that he has never been a Natural-Born American.

There are several famous personalities that are speaking out against Obama’s fraud: the star of Texas Rangers Chuck Norris, himself an honorary Texas Ranger; Gospel singer Pat Boone; and Victoria Johnson of Saturday Night live fame. Then there are the Hollywood stars such as Jane Fonda and Sean Penn on the other side of the issue. Ironically, Fonda’s brother Peter is not on Jane’s side.

It is time for Americans to step in and take action. Frankly, I can’t wait until March 2012 (the Birther Summit). I have to make some more appointments to see my Representatives in Congress and be more proactive. The harbinger signs that something was amiss in the US were evident to me many years ago. The current situation has confirmed my suspicions that America was and is being attacked from within; the infringements which have now risen to tyranny were in process in the 80s and prior to that. It was Nikita Khruschev, past Premier of the Soviet Union, who said in the 1950s that the Communists would take over America without a shot.

One of the the prime reasons that my Society for the Preservation of Democracy was established in 1987 is that I saw things happening that made it evident that corruption and betrayal were coming down the pike. Obama is a traitor to America. Obama is America’s Public enemy number one. He is a master actor and prevaricator, a Machiavellian “New World Order” player and he does not play fair. This is NO game, however. The entire world is in harm’s way.

The media should cease and desist referring to Obama as “President” Obama. Obama has not ever been President of the United States of America.

“The Emperor has no clothes” and he has been exposed.

It is only a matter of time. Obama will be brought to Justice and history WILL record Obama as a fraud and a criminal. There is NO “President” named Obama and there is NO room for the accommodation of a usurper to remain in office. The misprisioners of felony and of fraud, including Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden, who have allowed Obama to continue in Office should be ashamed. Very ashamed. They should also be arrested along with Obama and prosecuted for treason under 18 USC, Part 1, Chapter 115, Sec. 2381. Obama said today that “Dictators are on notice.” He should have been looking in a mirror when he said it and should heed his own advice.

Robert C. Laity


Editor’s Note: Pat Boone has recently stated that he believes that the birth certificate Obama presented to the public is “photoshopped.” An inaccurate article states that Boone was in Kenya “last month” and that an authentic birth certificate would have “layers.” The “Pennsylvania” link indicating an opinion piece written by Boone inaccurately links to an unrelated topic. The referenced article is here.

Mr. Laity has written several articles published at The Post & Email, one of which is entitled “There is no President Obama.”

by Nobarack08, blogging at Nobarack08′s Weblog

(Sep. 23, 2011) —
Baracka Abdallah Husein Obama, has never claimed any US Citizenship.

As the 1866 Act provides: “All persons born in the United States, and NOT SUBJECT to any foreign power, (excluding Indians not taxed,) are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States.”

quote; “NOT SUBJECT to any foreign power”

Baracka Abdallah Husein Obama has unequivocally stated that at birth he was a British subject, whose allegiance, protection, and jurisdiction was to the British Crown and WAS SUBJECT TO A FOREIGN POWER.

Obama’s statement never acknowledges any United States citizenship, allegiance, or Jurisdiction, in any part thereof, nor any other country.

Baracka Abdallah Husein Obama acknowledges only one allegaince and that is to a foreign power.

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Michelle Obama stated ‘Barack Obama a Kenyan’

Michelle Obama ‘When we visited Barack’s home country of Kenya’

A ‘citizen’ is not a ‘Natural Born Citizen’, as proven by the distinction in the Constitutional eligibility requirements in the United States Constitution.

United States Constitution Art 1, sec 2

Representitive eligibility requirement.

No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have …been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, .


United States Constitution Art 1, sec 3

Senatorial eligibility requirement.

No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have…been nine Years a Citizen of the United States


United States Constitution Art 2, sec1

Presidential requirement.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.


NOTE: ‘a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,’ the United States Constitution was adopted in 1789. ‘

Was Baracka Abdallah Husein Obama in the United States or any of the several indepedent and soverign States in 1789?

If they equated to the same definition and meaning the Founding Fathers, Framers, signers of the United States Constitution would have used the same wording.Baracka Abdallah Husein Obama was under British Law and British jurisdiction at birth and not the United States. Therefore was Baracka Abdallah Husein Obama even a citizen of the United States?

“The Supreme Court’s in Elk v. Wilkins 112U.S.94, 5 S.CT. 41, 28 L.ED. 643 (1884), the court ruled that the words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” the court held, mean “not merely subjct in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiance.” 100% jurisdiction required.

Per Tench Coxe (May 22, 1755 – July 17, 1824) was an American political economist and a delegate for Pennsylvania to the Continental Congress in 1788-1789. He wrote under the pseudonym “A Pennsylvanian.”

Written during the discussion of the United States Constitution


Quote “Our President must be matured by the experience of years, and being born among us, his character at thirty-five must be fully understood. Wisdom, virtue and active qualities of mind and body can alone make him the first servant of a free and enlightened people.”

The United States Naturalization Act of 1790 is clear; the right of citizenship did “not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States….” Citizenship was inherited exclusively through the father.

Again; the right of citizenship did “not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.

In the year 1873 the United States Attorney General ruled the word “jurisdiction” under the Fourteenth Amendment to mean:

The word “jurisdiction” must be understood to mean absolute and complete jurisdiction, such as the United States had over its citizens before the adoption of this amendment… Aliens, among whom are persons born here and naturalized abroad, dwelling or being in this country, are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States only to a limited extent. Political and military rights and duties do not pertain to them. (14 Op. Atty-Gen. 300.)

House Report No. 784, dated June 22, 1874, stated, “The United States have not recognized a double allegiance. By our law a citizen is bound to be ‘true and faithful’ alone to our government.” There is no way in the world anyone can claim “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” affirms the feudal common law doctrine of birth citizenship to aliens because such doctrine by operation creates a “double allegiance” between separate nations.

All persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together. Such is the rule of the common law. There are two exceptions, and only two, to the universality of its application. The children of ambassadors are, in theory, born in the allegiance of the powers the ambassadors represent; and slaves, in legal contemplation, are property, and not persons. The common law has made no distinction on account of race or color. Free persons of color, born within the allegiance of the United States are citizens, and have always been entitled to be so regarded.United States v.Rhodes, 1 Abb. U. iS. 28, 40; lAm.L. T. U. S. Ctt. 22.

Citizen has relative applications, which modify its sense in given cases. In its highest political sense, it signifies the persons who constitute the political society. It is not confined to persons enjoying the right of suffrage; and, on the other hand, a person may be an elector without being a citizen. And the mere fact of birth within the territorial limits of the United States does not constitute one a citizen. Opin. of Atty.-Gen. dishing, on Relation of Indiana, 7 Op. Att.-Gen. 746.

“And the mere fact of birth within the territorial limits of the United States does not constitute one a citizen.”

Birth and allegiance go together, get it.

Domicile in a foreign country does not affect the fact of citizenship, nor work a forfeiture of political rights. When the territory and government of a kingdom pass to and become merged in the territory and government of another nation, all of its subjects pass also. The tie which binds them is not bodily presence, but allegiance. Brown v. United States, 5 Ct. of CI. 571.

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4, 1982.”

By the common law, a subject travelling abroad on public or private business, with the express or implied license of his sovereign, is under that sovereign’s protection; and, consequently, both he and his children born while so travelling owe allegiance to and are citizens of the native country of their father. The length of the father’s residence abroad is not material, so that it was, in intention and in fact, temporary, not perpetual. And whether the mother was a citizen or not is unimportant: the status of the child is determined by that of the father. Ludlam v. Ludlam, 31 Barb. 486; Davis v. Hall, 1 Nott fr M. 292; Lasportas v. De la Motta, 10 Rich. Eq. 38.

Quote: “By the common law, a subject travelling abroad on public or private business, with the express or implied license of his sovereign, is under that sovereign’s protection; and, consequently, both he and his children born while so travelling owe allegiance to and are citizens of the native country of their father.”

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4, 1961, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.”

Under the act of April 14, 1802, ch. 288, 5 4, the children of persons duly naturalized under any of the laws of the United States, being under the age of twenty-one years at the time of their parents being so naturalized, are, if dwelling within the United States, to be considered as citizens of the United States. Campbell v. Gordon, 6 Crunch, 176.

Is Barack Obama naturalized as a United States citizen? NO!

Although a state, by its laws, passed since the adoption of the constitution, may put a foreigner, or any other description of persons, upon a footing with its own citizens as to all the rights and privileges enjoyed by them within its dominion and by its laws, that will not make him a citizen of the United States, nor entitle him to sue in its courts, nor to any of the privileges and immunities of a citizen in another state. Dral Scott r. Sandford, 19 How. 393.

The term citizens of a state, as used in the constitution, applies only to natural persons, members of the body politic, owing allegiance to the state, and not to artificial persons created by the legislature, and possessing only the attributes which the legislature has prescribed. Paul o.Virginia, 8 WaU. 168.

Created by the legislature equates to persons ‘naturalized’, even if Baracka Abdallah Hussein Obama was ‘naturalized’ he would be an artificial person.

Baracka Abdallah Hussein Obama born a Brit never legit, foreign and alien to the United States.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

The Liberal Defection Begins
: With the collapse of green jobs darling, Solyndra and GE's growing struggles in the alternative energy market, Obama's illegitimate presidency is manifesting with destructive consequences to leftist interests and personal welfare of former liberal media propagandists, like David Brooks of the New York Times. Now, he, and many like him in the media are seeking asylum in the graces of repentant contrition. Unfortunately, for Brooks, simply admitting he was wrong does not repair the damage done by his passive egress to Obama.

commentary by Pen Johannson
Editor of The Daily Pen

New York, NY - As hard as I try, I can’t bring myself to imagine Obama shedding a tear when he is forced to admit that he is the greatest fraud in history.

To creatures like Obama, failure to maintain a deception about his nefarious identity is simply a bump in the long ideological road upon which such a radical cause for twisted justice slowly crawls. As ghosts like Obama pass away, the evil cause is simply taken up by the next radical change agent who happens to fall in the hole left after reckless incompetence is momentarily eradicated.

Obama is nothing to those controlling this epic story. He is just one of a slew of humanity’s failed liars possessing delusions of grandeur about creating his own world upon the equity of others.

Obama's sense of entitlement to determine what is fair for all is rooted in his birth. Conceived in bi-racial illegitimacy by a wayward teenage mother and a foreign, dead-beat, alchoholic womanizer, Obama was born with an identity he did not want. Rather than beholding himself as a whole person of multicultural merit, he became entrenched in liberal radicalism and, thereby, chose to attach his worth to a false understanding about his racially half-bred, disadvantaged youth. This identity spoke a message of inferiority, not equality, to him. As a result, Obama is afraid of being seen as inferior. One only needs to examine his inflated language and over educated contempt for vintage, white American heritage.

A perfect example of this delusion is Obama's myopic insistance that the only possible way to implement fairness in taxation between the rates paid by secretaries and the millionaires who employ them is to increase the rates of those he believes don't pay their fair share. This liberal tenet exposes such a blind spot in Obama it is laughable, which is this:

Why is it that Obama's only considered option in implementing tax fairness is to RAISE the taxes of the American's he thinks are not paying their fair share. How about the novel concept of LOWERING the taxes of those he thinks pay too much?

This is what liberalism does to the human mind. It corrupts it...blinds it and then it destroys it.

Obama's inferiority complex is so deep-seated, it prompted him to disseminate the greatest lie in American political history in order to hide the truth about who he really is. The liberal media, including the New York Times, helped him tell that lie by refusing to investigate blatant evidence of Obama's deception.

Apparently, however, some of Obama’s abettors may be having a change of heart.

New York Times Op-Ed columnist and long standing Obama shill, David Brooks is coming to his moment of repentance about his support for the Chose One. Brooks, like slews of degenerate leftists who once sold their soul to the idea of a messianic Obama and his message of hope and change, is realizing what a terrible mistake he made.

In his recent op-ed on September 19, 2011, Brooks states, “I’m a sap, a specific kind of sap. I’m an Obama Sap.”

If Brooks were a thinking man, he would have researched the term “SAP” and found that one of its definitions is known to political strategists as a “Self Avoiding Polygon”. This refers to an exercise in which a single line is drawn on a multipoint lattice in a way that connects all the dots but which requires the allowance of gaps in each row and column of dots of the lattice.

The concept of "self avoiding gaps" has a significant part in Mr. Brooks' lamentations about the Fallen One, Obama.

Brooks continued, “When the president said the unemployed couldn’t wait 14 more months for help and we had to do something right away, I believed him. When administration officials called around saying that the possibility of a double-dip recession was horrifyingly real and that it would be irresponsible not to come up with a package that could pass right away, I believed them.”

Now Brooks is wondering what other lies and misinformation he may have believed about Obama without actually taking the time to investigate the truth.

Perhaps Brooks believed that Obama was actually eligible to be president. Perhaps he believed that Obama was verified as a Natural Born candidate, as required by the U.S. Constitution. Perhaps Brooks was blinded by ideology to such depth and decrepitude that not even he was able to see the teeth-gnashing reality now being wrought by such stored wrath.

Get ready. David Brooks is about to go from a ‘sap’…to an unadulterated ass.

“Yes, I’m a sap,” Brooks states, “I believed Obama when he said he wanted to move beyond the stale ideological debates that have paralyzed this country. I always believe that Obama is on the verge of breaking out of the conventional categories and embracing one of the many bipartisan reform packages that are floating around.”

Brooks, like so many leftists like him, made the initial mistake of taking for granted that Obama was a legitimately qualified candidate. They hated Obama's predecessor so much, and wanted to see him humiliated so bad, that they would have voted for Charles Manson if it was discovered the convicted mass murderer was a Democrat. Hell, they would have voted for Manson even if he was a Republican. Anyone but Bush to them was worthy. Even a deceiver like Obama.

Clearly disappointed in Obama, Brooks continues by trying to objectify his political rivals, “But remember, I’m a sap. The White House has clearly decided that in a town of intransigent Republicans and mean ideologues, it has to be mean and intransigent too. The president was stung by the liberal charge that he was outmaneuvered during the debt-ceiling fight. So the White House has moved away from the Reasonable Man approach or the centrist Clinton approach.”

I've known Mr. Brooks' work for many years. He remains obstinate about Obama's biographical testimony. Sadly, Brooks also remains perpetually locked in his absurd ideological prison, now trapped with his chosen eternity as an Obama robot.

If I might address Mr. Brooks directly, here’s the universal truth. Republicans aren’t intransigent, as you desperately wish to showcase. Republican stubborness is merely the lame hitch upon which you desperately wish to hook your excuse for Obama. You don't get off that easy. Sorry.

Republicans aren't stubborn, they are just simply right. Right about America. Right about Obama and, tragically, right about you.

Republicans didn’t have to “outmaneuver” Obama, as you believe they attempted. They were already riding the straight and narrow, albeit bumby, rut in reverse when Obama shifted into "D" and drove the country out of that rut and completely off the cliff. Yes, in his narrative about driving a car, "R" means Reverse to Obama, but reverse is a hell of lot better when your headed over the edge. Obama is shifting us into "D" and giving it gas!

Your corrupted perspective makes it seem like any divergence between Obama and his rivals must, of course, mean that there is maneuvering or erratic positioning going on. However, the tragic, hard truth for lost people like you is that appearance of divergence is just your Obama love train going off the rails into oblivion while the rest of us continue on the Express in the other direction, toward the only viable destination.

You see, David, America was not founded upon deception and lies. It became manifest by the natural consequence of the blood ransom paid by those worthier of higher positions than anyone living today can achieve. Your failure to understand this is the very same reason why you supported a radical subversive alias like Barack Obama.

Obama is the king of liars, and you believed him. Unfortunately, for many, including you, Obama must have been an effective liar. For vintage Americans, like myself, I saw Obama's lies the very moment I witnessed his announcement to run for president on that cold February day in Springfield. I was there. Where were you?

Sorry. The truth hurts. I truly hope you survive the impact. You seem like a decent fellow. However, if you don’t, I can’t feel sorry for you. We tried to tell you the truth about Obama for years and you mocked us, derided us, hated us and called us all kinds of vile names.
So, take your medicine. You deserve far worse than a broken heart over a fraud like Obama. You deserve to have Obama as your only savior…

You, Mr. Brooks, are not only a sap for Obama, you now have to face that you, and your newspaper, were also a tool used for your capacity as a dimwitted medium so lustfully willing to channel the destruction of the most fraudulent politician in world history. You availed yourself to this cause, not because of your affirmation of Obama…but because of your hatred for his predecessor. Now, that hatred has become mete with your desire for it. It has matured into a full recompense for your loyalty in nuturing it. It has become Barack Obama.

Don’t be disappointed that Obama isn’t the person you wanted him to be. Be ashamed that Obama isn’t the man he should have been when called to be so, and that you vigorously supported him in his deception. You allowed him to continue his lies, unabated, unrequited and unchallenged. Well, you wanted him. Now, you can have him.

From that plummeting perspective, being a sap might be something you should think about holding on hard as you can.
Here’s What It Will Take


by One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.
I'd vote for "One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet" for President.

The U.S. Constitution was created by the 13 original colonies to form a limited federal government

(Sep. 21, 2011) — The question is “What will it take to save the United States Constitution from becoming a discarded article, to be regulated as a document that will be remembered as ‘flawed’ in its conception of individual freedoms afforded to all?” Okay, what will it take?

Well, for those who are too blind to see that this country is about to go down the tubes, it’ll take a consensus of opinion on, first of all, what’s important. I’ve heard that the most pressing issue is jobs; no, it’s healthcare; wait, it’s Social Security, it’s the national debt, it’s an amnesty bill, it’s higher wages for teachers. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

For those of us who have been paying attention, the answer is beyond obvious. For some of the others, like Tea Partiers and Birthers, the answer may actually have no bearing on their own narrow field of expertise. I am not saying that the “stimulus” isn’t just another name for payoffs and kickbacks. After all, the Ship of State is sinking so it’s always the case for the crooks to empty the coffers. I’m not saying that the place of Obama’s birth isn’t important, because it’s very important. No, the ONLY issue is your life, and the lives of your loved ones, relatives, neighbors, the lives of all Americans, Infidels, unbelievers, dog-lovers, eaters of barbequed pulled pork sandwiches, bacon, ham, who allow women to be seen in public without a hijab, or at the beach in a bikini.

The ONLY issue is your ability to breathe your next breath and die of old age, but you know what? I’d be surprised if Americans can even get together on the importance of survival. Let’s see if I can clear it up some.

I’m not going to waste your time nor mine writing about reasons and blame. Pointing-finger time is long past; let’s deal with the here and now. Irrespective if Obama is flown down to Gitmo tonight and thrown in a cage with his Muslim buddies doesn’t change the equation. Obama pulled off what he was supposed to do in his first six months; these last two and a half years have just been gravy for his side, our enemy.

The goal is to make the United States an Islamic Caliphate, which means that the Constitution will be replaced with Sharia Law, which means “Respect Islam.” The blueprint for the takeover of the U.S. was to follow what the National Socialist Party accomplished in the 1930’s in Germany. What has occurred in England during the past twenty years will occur in the U.S. within the next ten.

Indeed, there are many fronts to this war, from destroying the value of the dollar to making our court system treat “honor killings” as something other than murder in the first degree. In many countries in Europe there are areas that have been designated as “Sharia enforcement zones.” England has at least eighty-five Sharia courts which work in conjunction with the existing court system and defer to Islamic cases.

The eroding of the American way of life has been extremely successful for our enemy by using the ACLU to force courts to rule in favor of Sharia, for example: forbidding nativity scenes on public land, abolishing prayer before a high school football game, disallowing the Pledge of Allegiance in schools and also at the opening city council meetings, by ruling in favor of those who are “offended” by the display of Old Glory. These American lawyers, judges, administrators, teachers, and law enforcement officers have all danced to the tune of Sharia, step by step. That they were “used” is obvious; what isn’t obvious is the willingness with which many of our fellow citizens have danced. The only possible answer is that a great many Americans have no concept of what freedom is and how easily lost it can be. But even worse is that they don’t even know that they are being used, even now. Just tune into any mainstream media news organization and listen while they say “President Obama” when, in fact, he is an imposter, posing as an American, ineligible, and therefore not the president. Listen to Congressman Mike Quigley apologize for America, as just one example.

If there were a candidate who does not care about being “liked,” who doesn’t care about being reelected for a second term, who isn’t afraid to call for (and make stick) the deportation of each and every illegal immigrant in America, who isn’t afraid to deport every Muslim, who isn’t afraid to kick the UN out for good, who supports the Second Amendment, who will arrest every officer of the Federal Reserve Bank for Grand Theft, who will save our dollar, who will demand that teachers teach and if Johnny can’t read, he doesn’t graduate; that this cap and trade nonsense stops right now: don’t pollute, that we don’t give any money to our enemies, that we go in and totally destroy Iran’s nuclear program, that we support Israel 110% 24/7, if we can find a person who knows about the military firsthand who isn’t a “politician” but a United States citizen who took an Oath to the United States Constitution, if we can find someone like that, we’ll have one heck of a good chance. If not, we’ll have to take our guns to the streets.

Monday, September 19, 2011

Meet Malik! Obama’s Oldest Brother


by WTPOTUS, ©2011, blogging at WTPOTUS

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

(Sep. 19, 2011) — A recent story at WorldNetDaily documented some shady business concerning the eldest brother of Barack Hussein Obama II. Malik Obama’s charity foundation, which he named after their father, received an unexplained retroactive reprieve by the IRS, no doubt courtesy of his declared half-brother Barack. But before we get into that story, let’s examine some of what we here at WTPOTUS have learned over the years about Abon’go Malik Obama (aka Roy Obama, aka Abdul Malik Hussein Obama, aka Al-Malik Hussein Obama).

O Brother, who art thou?


Malik was born March 15, 1958, to Barack Hussein Obama (BHO Sr., aka Barry Wuod Akumu Nyanjoga Obama) and his first wife Kezia (or Keziah) Aoko “Grace” Nyandega.


Not long afterward, his father departed for the United States, to study at the University of Hawaii Manoa, where he allegedly met and married Stanley Ann Dunham, the purported mother of the current president of the United States. The family told reporters in 2004 that BHO Sr. left for the US in 1959, where he worked for an oil company, studied at the U of Hawaii, and met and married a white woman named Anna Toot.

Malik and his mother, it’s said, remained behind in Kenya. At the time of BHO Sr.’s departure, Kezia was pregnant with their daughter, Auma Marie “Rita” Obama (aka Dr. Rita Obama, aka Auma Saidi), who was born in January 1960. See our O Timeline for details and links to sources. In 1962, on immigration paperwork, BHO Sr. stated that he had only one child, Roy (Malik).

Malik attended elementary school in Alego Kogelo, at what is now the Senator Barack Obama Primary School, renamed in 2006. About 1967, Malik and his sister Auma moved into the large Woodley Estates home, in Nairobi, where BHO Sr. lived with his second American wife, Ruth Beatrice Baker Obama Ndesandjo. Malik and Auma attended private schools. Malik’s mother Kezia worked as a waitress and lived elsewhere, Alego or perhaps Shauri Moyo in Nairobi. Various other members of the extended Obama family came and went at the relatively posh home–certainly posh compared to conditions in the Obama ancestral village.

Ruth Beatrice Baker

According to the Sally Jacobs biography of Barack Sr. (p. 232), in 1973 Malik was attending the prestigious Lenana high school, a boarding school in Nairobi(formerly known as the Duke of York school). Malik is not listed by Wikipedia as being among Lenana’s distinguished alumnae. Jacobs reports that BHO Sr.’s wife Ruth (who reportedly came from a prominent New England family) paid Malik’s tuition. Jacobs also averred that Ruth was the only real “mummy” that Malik and Auma ever knew.

Malik remained in Kenya at least until 1977, where he was spotted visiting his father at his apartment, after BHO Sr.’s separation from Ruth.

Sometime before his death, allegedly in 1984, David Opiyo Obama Ndesandjo, second son of Ruth and BHO Sr., ran away from home. It was on the streets that Malik is said to have found David and took him under his wing, becoming his refuge and mentor in the ways of pan-Africanism and possibly Islam. Before Malik moved to the US, he studied at a “madrasah in Nairobi.” In his admittedly semi-fictional memoir, Dreams from My Father (p. 265), Barack stated that Malik got a degree in accounting from the University of Nairobi.

Auma Obama

It’s said that David Opiyo died in a motorcycle accident, but the year changes, depending upon the source. To date we’ve seen no independent confirmation of this event–no news story, no photo of his grave. Why was he not buried next to his father and grandfather, especially because he embraced his African roots? In some versions of the story, Ruth’s family blamed Malik for David’s death, because Malik and David had been out on the town together that fateful evening. Malik was drinking and carousing, and ended up being arrested. David borrowed his motorbike to get home, according to Barack’s book. Not long afterward, Malik left Kenya for the USA.

Coming to America

By 1985, Malik was in the USA, because Barack, who at the time worked in Chicago as a community organizer, traveled to Washington, DC, to visit him. Malik admitted meeting Barack in the USA, ”for the first time” in 1985. WND tells us that

A private investigative report … shows that Roy Obama has been identified since 1988 with 22 different rental addresses in the Washington, D.C., area, including addresses in Prince Georges County and Montgomery County, Md.

Malik’s mother, Kezia, says she first met Barack in Kenya, when he visited in 1985. But an African news article stated that Barack first went to Kenya in 1983, “to mourn his late father,” who died the year before.
Did Malik return to the USA with Barack in 1983? Or did they travel together to Kenya to meet the family in 1985?

Why did Malik come to the USA? What drew him? Was it the presence of his long “lost” illegal alien Uncle Omar?

Aunt Zeituni

But Malik lived in Maryland, while Omar lived in Massachusetts from the time he arrived around 1963. Omar (aka Obama Onyango) was in Cambridge in 1971; he was still there in 1987, according to an IRS lien against him for non-payment of taxes. Aunt Zeituni Onyango came and went, too, but she also lived in Massachusetts.

What exactly did Malik do for a living in Washington, DC, from 1985 until he returned to Kenya? Did he work as an accountant, as one story implied? Where did he work?

Was Malik sponsored by his brother Barack who, despite official accounts, may have met Malik and the rest of the Kenyan family in Kenya, after the death of their father? Or was Malik here illegally, too, like Uncle Omar and Aunt Zeituni?

When Barack first traveled to Kenya and met his African relatives is unknown. It all depends upon what source you read! Again, refer to the O Timeline for details. (See the convenient tab at the top of the blog.)

How old does he look there? 22? Certainly a very young man. This in-depth story seems to indicate that Barack did go to Kenya shortly after his father’s death:

Jane Obonyo, Keziah’s sister, was the woman who telephoned the future US president to inform him about his father’s death. … It was Keziah Obama’s daughter, Auma Obama, who picked him up from Jomo Kenyatta International Airport. She took him to Jane’s residence in Kariokor flats where Keziah Obama also lived. … During this visit the future president also lived with Auma (Keziah’s daughter) at her residence in the plush suburb of Kileleshwa in Nairobi. … Keziah had started living in the Kariokor flats with her sister Jane shortly after the burial of Dr. Obama in 1982. … Her biological son, Abongo Obama travelled to the US. … Abo and Ben Obama, the younger sons of Keziah were teens at the time and … Auma Obama was studying at a German university where she later earned a doctoral degree.

Another story from an African journal flat out states that Barack was in Kenya in 1982 for the funeral. So it seems that Barack visited Kenya before Malik moved to the USA. Some speculate that there was a dual purpose to this trip, which hints at the reason for the obfuscation: In order to keep his Kenyan citizenship, Barack would have had to travel to Kenya to swear an oath of allegiance upon reaching the age of majority. Only then could he keep his Kenyan passport (if he had one, that is). Nobody knows (who’s telling) what nation’s passport Barack used on his many overseas trips to Pakistan, Indonesia, Kenya, and Japan, among other destinations.

Public records shed more light on Malik’s life here in America. A private investigator learned that Malik has a Social Security number and that it was issued between 1985 and 1987. But then, again, so did Aunt Zeituni and Uncle Omar–both illegally in the United States.

In March of 1988, Montgomery General Hospital filed a complaint in the District Court of Montgomery County, Maryland, against defendant Roy A. Obama of 8623 Flower Ave, Takoma Park, MD.

An American Wife?

In July of 1990, Roy Abon Go Obama of 7244 Landover Road #C, Landover, MD 20785, filed for divorce in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, MD. The respondent/defendant was Mary K. Cole of 5200 Silver Hill Road, Forestville, MD 20747. The case number was CAD90-16597, Obama vs Cole. The divorce was uncontested and granted by Judge Ernest Loveless on October 10, 1990. Records do not show the date of marriage.

Was Mary K. Cole a U.S. citizen? It seems likely, given her surname. Did they have children? Not mentioned in the court records that are available online. This story says that when Barack met Malik, he was married to an “American Peace Corps worker.” Mary was likely that particular wife, unless Malik was married to more than one American woman at the same time.

Which begs these questions: Did Malik meet Mary through her work for the Peace Corps? Did their marriage give him a ticket to the promised land of America? Did their marriage allow him to become a citizen of the USA, if he is a citizen?

A Name Change

In November of 1991, Malik filed in Prince George’s County, Maryland, to officially change his name from Roy Abon Go Obama (aka Abon Go Malik Obama) to Abon’go Malik Obama. Malik still lived at 7244 Landover Rd, #C, in Landover, MD. On March 7, 1992, Judge Ahalt granted his request. The case number was CAE91-22380.

The next year, Malik served as best man at his half-brother Barack’s wedding, in Chicago, to Michelle Robinson. They married October 3, 1992, at Trinity United Church of Christ, the congregation of Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Malik wore traditional African clothing. Which of his wives attended, if any, is unknown.

Another American Wife? In March of 1996, Sheree A. Obama (dob 6/2/59) of 7978 Lakecrest Drive, Greenbelt, MD 20770, filed for divorce in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, MD. The respondent/defendant was Abongo M Obama of Nyangema [Nyang'oma] Kogelo Primary School, Ngiya Slaya [Siaya, Nyanza] Kenya. The case number was CAD96-04351, Obama vs Obama. The divorce was uncontested and granted by Judge Martin on July 11, 1997.

Sheree is also listed on public records as Sheree Wood Obama. Exactly when they married and whether they had any children is not mentioned in the available court records. It seems likely that Sheree was also a U.S. citizen, going by her name. Malik stated that Barack was best man at one of his marriages. Which marriage and where the wedding took place is unknown at this time–Malik has had many wives on more than one continent. Although unemployed, Sheree appears to have generously donated $500 and then later another $250 to her former half-brother-in-law’s election campaign in 2008.

In 2003, Malik married a young woman who, when they first met in 2000, was still in Muslim secondary school in Kisumu. Her name is Hafsa Abwanda; she is now about 33 years old. On video, Hafsa tells how she didn’t like her role as a “co-wife”, how Malik had more wives than the four Islam allows, and how she “escaped” the marriage after five years because Malik beat Hafsa (and his other wives). Hafsa shows a photo of Malik with several women and children, and she names the wives. Malik denied to the TV reporter that he had more than the allowed number of wives, but the caption beneath the video says,

NTV has reliably learnt the teenager could be the twelfth woman to live with Malik as husband and wife.

Malik has joked that he won’t discuss how many wives he has. Malik and Hafsa had a son before she fled the marriage. Below is the photo of Malik, some of his wives, and some of his children, as identified by Hafsa on the video.

In August of 2004, Malik was in Kenya, living with an African wife named Fauziah Anyango. Malik remained a “frequent visitor to the USA,” but the report does not explain how his frequent trips were financed. In October of 2004, he ran an electronics shop and occasionally worked as a “consultant” in Washington DC.

A video on You Tube that was posted during the campaign of 2008 features Malik. He talks about his worry that too many people in Kenya are cashing in on Barack’s new-found fame. Malik wanted to “pursue it,” leaving the impression that Malik was worried about the commercialization of his brother’s name only because whatever these Kenyan entrepreneurs made was cash not flowing into Malik’s pockets. Or, to be charitable, into his charity’s pockets. Several reporters appeared to agree:

But the foundation seems to be capitalizing on the Obama name. A California-based company is selling T-shirts with the president’s image and the phrase “Yes We Cannabis.” It promises half of the proceeds will go to the Barack H. Obama Foundation.

What a wonderful example to set for the youth of the world!

On the video, Malik stressed that he wanted to set the record straight: He’s Barack’s brother, not his uncle, an error that he said was too frequently made in media reports. Malik had an interesting take on Barack’s election, stating,

My brother rules now.

Which foundation were they talking about? That would be Malik’s charitable foundation.

Alton Baysden

In 2008, the Barack H. Obama Foundation, a supposed tax-exempt charity, was founded in the home of Alton Raymond Baysden, who formerly worked for the US State Department and later for the UN in Haiti.

Last May, Baysden admitted to reporters that they had not registered as a charity before soliciting for and collecting donations, which for ordinary people would constitute fraud. Ordinary people being anyone not related to Barack Obama. As with other instances of questionable issues involving members of the extended Obama family, the White House had no comment. More about Baysden here.

Investor’s Business Daily carried an editorial in January of 2008 that expressed some concern over Malik’s influence on soon-to-be President Barack Obama:

The candidate [Barack Obama] already has heeded his church’s “nonnegotiable commitment to Africa,” spending an inordinate amount of his campaign time on the Kenyan crisis, for one. Obama has close family ties to Kenya, and even founded a school in his ancestral village — the Senator Obama School.

In the bloody conflict there, which already has claimed some 700 lives, Obama appears to have sided with opposition leader Raila Odinga, head of the same Luo tribe to which Obama’s late Muslim father belonged. [Raila claims to be Barack's cousin.]

Obama’s older brother still lives there. Abongo “Roy” Obama is a Luo activist and a militant Muslim who argues that the black man must “liberate himself from the poisoning influences of European culture.” He urges his younger brother to embrace his African heritage.

Beyond family politics, these ties have potential foreign policy, even national security, implications.

Odinga is a Marxist who reportedly has made a pact with a hard-line Islamic group in Kenya to establish Shariah courts throughout the country. He has also vowed to ban booze and pork and impose Muslim dress codes on women — moves favored by Obama’s brother.

In 2009, visitors arrived in Kogelo:

A group of Missouri State college students who visited the Obama family village … and who met the president’s half-brother [Malik], felt something was amiss. They sensed he was an “operator” and decided to give their donation of 400 pounds of medical supplies directly to a local clinic.

“We didn’t know what he was going to do with them,” said Ken Rutherford, a former Missouri State professor who led the trip and who shared in the 1997 Nobel Peace Prize for his work to ban landmines.

Rutherford said the Obamas’ relatives are the only Muslims in a village of 4,000 Christians and that Malik has a private mosque on his property.

In January of 2009, Malik was spotted aboard a plane departing from DC, headed for Doha, Qatar. At that time, Malik said he owned a company called RockStone of Afrika Siaya Electricals. A search on that name turned up a rather unimpressive blog. Malik took a pilgrimage to Mecca around the same time, and started a family feud with step-grandmother Sarah Ogwel Onyango:

Malik Obama the President Obama’s step brother allegedly tried to assault Mama Sarah Obama and other family members forcing … police intervention … after … brief fist skirmishes.

The discontent in the Obama family came to the surface recently emerging from a long standing dispute between Mama Sara Obama and her step grand son Malik Obama aged 50 who recently returned from a pilgrimage in Mecca, Saudi Arabia.

Malik who is a step grand son according to Sara put his own homestead on Mama Sara Obama’s parcel of land. He left the homestead secretly in the absence of Mama Sara who had traveled to Karachuonyo to see other members of the family. It is mama Sara who had the land title deed registered in her own name and … tradition … and virtue required Malik to [seek] her permission first before constructing any structures.

But Mama Sara says Malik … who is the first child of the late Barrack Obama Snr and his first wife Kezia… forcefully constructed his own home,and fenced it off and is alleged and rumoured to have sought for cash donations from some Arab Moslem countries to enable him construct a Mosque on the same land without Sarah Obama’s permission.

Upon his return Malik is said to have … started the foundation of the proposed mosque without Mama Sara’s permission. But she … was only prevailed upon not to take legal action against Malik by the immediate members of the family during BARRACK Obama Jnr Presidential campaign in the US since the publicity could have impacted to it negatively. But she said plans are underway of evicting Malik out of the land in the near future.

Malik and others of the extended Obama family were invited to the White House for the Inauguration.

Malik on the far left. On the far right, Joseph Ndesandjo, son of Ruth Obama Ndesandjo and her second husband. Second from right, Mark Ndesandjo, half-brother of Barack on their father’s side and half-brother of Joseph Ndesandjo on their mother’s side.
In February, 2010, Al-Riyadh reported that “Al-Malik Hussein Obama, the brother of U.S. President Barack Obama, participated in a Khartoum conference of the trustees of the Organization of Islamic Da’wa.”

The following June, a rift developed between factions of the Obama family in Alego Kogelo, centered around the construction of the Obama cultural center. Allegations were that Sarah Obama was fostering questionable ties with Libya and “Islamic Arabian states” and that Dr. Rita Auma Obama’s “real brother” Malik Obama had “established many Arabian contacts in his dealings and investments.” The situation threatened to embarrass the Obama administration, causing then US Ambassador to Kenya, Michael E. Ranneberger, to intervene. It seemed to boil down to a power struggle between Sarah Obama and Malik Abongo Obama over who was the true spokesperson and decision-maker for the Obama family. Hard to say who won that battle.

The following October, Malik made news again, when it was reported that he had married for the “third time.” This time the bride was a 19-year-old named Sheila Anyango, 30 years younger than he. Sheila’s mother, Mary Aoko Ouma, was not amused that Sheila had dropped out of school to marry Malik. Mary wished never again to see her daughter, because she married against her wishes, without her permission, and also set a bad example for her siblings. Malik denied that he did not have Mary’s permission.

In December 2010, Malik was featured in the Saudi Gazette:

Speaking to Okaz/Saudi Gazette, Abdul Malik Obama said the family is a perfect example of this mindset [of tolerance] because the US president has embraced Christianity while the rest of the family are Muslims and are leading Da’wa work, the religious call, in Africa.

Abdul Malik Hussein Obama is spending most of his time in serving about 10 million Kenyan Muslims, who represent 35 percent of the country’s population, through Islamic centers and charitable societies he supervises.

He is also working as the executive secretary of the Islamic Da’wa Organization in Kenya.

Despite the circumstances of his work, he has been in contact with his brother, President Obama, and maintains a private office in the USA, where he manages his private business, along with three offices in Kenya.

Dr. Ali Al-Malki, adviser, religious caller and member of the Reconciliation Committee, said he met Abdul Malik Obama earlier this year in Sana’a, Yemen, during the deliberations of a forum to help orphans.
Al-Malki said he has coordinated with Abdul Malik Obama to visit Kenya and learn about the work of the charitable and Islamic societies there and the cooperation among them.

Dr. Ali Al-Malki (or Maliki) is a member of something called the “Reconciliation Committee”, which appears to be a Saudi NGO (Islamic/Shariah law) that helps resolve religious disputes and criminal cases.

These days, Malik lives in Kenya next to step-grandmother Sarah, serving as the self-appointed “president” of the village of Nyangoma-Kogelo, helping to keep reporters away from Sarah, who appears to be almost under house arrest because nobody can visit her without permission from the “district commissioner”, who won’t give permission on orders, it appears, from the Kenyan government.

Which brings us back to the WND story about the special treatment Malik’s foundation received from our federal government:

This week, the IRS confirmed to WND that the Barack H. Obama Foundation received a determination letter in June, awarding the group tax-exempt 501(c)3 status, retroactively to 2008. …

The concern of the National Legal and Policy Center was that the foundation may have violated federal and/or state postal and tax laws by soliciting via the Internet and U.S. mail tax-deductible contributions without having made required filings and without having received necessary IRS tax-exempt determinations.

The Form 990 listed Samuel Andika Obiero of Arlington, Va., and Andrew Mboya of Hackensack, N.J., as directors, in addition to Abongo Malik Obama.

The Form 990 … did not list Baysden as a director.

We have not yet tracked down the identities of the other two directors of Malik’s Foundation: Andrew Mboya and Samuel Andika Obiero. But we’ve learned through experience not to believe in coincidences when analyzing the Obama family connections. BHO Sr. was a friend of Tom Mboya. Was, in fact, a witness to his assassination in Kenya. BHO Sr. was also a friend of a postal worker by the name of Adede Abiero (a variant of the Luo name Obiero). Abiero was killed when BHO Sr., driving drunk, crashed his Fiat into another car. Abiero was in the passenger seat.

It should come as no surprise to anyone that Sally Jacobs reports in her book (p. 6) that Malik intends to write the “definitive biography of his father.” No surprise at all! There’s hardly an Obama or an Obama relative who hasn’t written a book or, as is the preferred method, a semi-factual “memoir” with composite characters and fictitious timelines. Likely most of them have ghostwriters. Barack Obama, Mark Ndesandjo, Auma Obama, George Obama, Michelle Obama, Maya Soetoro-Ng. Now Malik.

From the “you can’t make this up category”, a June 2011 video, from a gathering in Washington DC, features a speech by Malik Obama about “character education.” Malik’s speech was long, slow, full of platitudes, and lacking much of substance. Although he’s a devout Muslim, Malik said he finds the goals of The Peaceful Solution Character Education Program to be in line with his own beliefs. Certainly Malik has one thing in common with the founder of that organization, Yisrayl Hawkins: Many wives.

Yisrayl is alleged to have 30, so Malik has some catching up to do.

In his speech, Malik stressed what he considers to be major problems facing today’s world: lack of self-control, selfishness, self-centeredness, fear, and poor leadership.

Dare we hope that Malik has changed?

Sunday, September 18, 2011

Orly Taitz: Update on Hawaii Cases and Her Upcoming Visit to Washington, DC
by Sharon Rondeau

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Orly Taitz speaking with Dr. Robert Newman of Christian Coalition at the California Republican Convention on September 17, 2011. Photo credit: George Miller, Ventura County Tea Party

(Sep. 18, 2011) — While en route to the California Republican Convention, Dr. Orly Taitz contacted The Post & Email to provide an update on her two lawsuits filed in Hawaii. One is a state case with a hearing date scheduled for October 12, while the other is federal and has a hearing scheduled for November 21, 2011.

In the latter case, Hawaii Department of Health Director Loretta Fuddy had been under subpoena from the U.S. District Court in Honolulu to make available for inspection the original birth record of Barack Hussein Obama by August 8, 2011. Taitz has gathered evidence from several private investigators indicating that Obama is using a social security number issued in the state of Connecticut when he never worked nor lived there, resulting in her lawsuit, Taitz v. Astrue filed in February 2011.

Taitz and two document examiners flew to Honolulu in advance of the August 8 deadline to inspect the birth record. However, Fuddy did not appear, and instead, a letter was presented to Taitz explaining that Obama’s original birth record could not be produced for inspection due to “privacy concerns.” Taitz has stated that Fuddy “broke federal law” by refusing to produce the records under subpoena.

The image presented to the public on April 27, 2011 purported to be a certified copy of Obama’s original birth certificate has been called “a bad forgery.”

Last year, former White House spokesman Robert Gibbs failed to address a reporter’s question about Obama’s Connecticut social security number, but rather, laughed nervously, stuttered, and mocked “faithful readers” of WorldNetDaily who were still questioning “the president’s birth certificate.” Gibbs also claimed that he “put it [the birth certificate] on the internet.”

It is unknown where Fuddy was on August 8, and the Hawaii Department of Health has refused to release her work schedule to The Post & Email after we filed a request for it under Hawaii’s UIPA, or open records, law. After filing an appeal to the Office of Information Practices, Attorney Linden Joesting supported the DOH’s contention that Fuddy’s work schedule could be kept confidential because Fuddy “keeps her work and personal appointments in one place and shares it only as needed with her personal secretary.” The Post & Email will be publishing a full report on this development in the near future.

Taitz has submitted a reply to the government’s opposition to the subpoena commanding her to produce the birth certificate and is represented by Hawaii Assistant Attorney General Jill T. Nagamine. “They’re claiming privacy, and I provided information questioning ‘what privacy,’ as Obama has posted this document on, but he also posted it on mugs and T-shirts that are being sold by the Democratic National Committee. The man is a criminal. He’s using a forged document, and he’s bragging with the forgery; he is flaunting this forgery in front of the whole nation. It’s shocking that our federal judges, our congressmen and senators are allowing this to go on. This is criminal. There is no privacy; it was specifically made public. The interest of the country not to have a criminal in the White House supersedes all notion of privacy which was waived a long time ago.”

Obama’s campaign website is also selling the merchandise. In regard to the questions about Obama’s birthplace, Obama’s deputy campaign manager, Julianna Smoot, reportedly said that “There’s really no way to make this stuff completely go away. The only thing we can do is laugh at it — and make sure as many other people as possible are in on the joke.”

Obama’s birthplace may be irrelevant to his constitutional eligibility to serve as president, as his father was a foreigner and never a U.S. citizen. Some researchers have contended that the citizenship of the father or both parents is a factor in whether or not a child is considered a “natural born Citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Taitz is seeking the original birth record, if there is one, because of “information showing that Obama’s birth certificate was fraudulently obtained” and “We already have paperwork from SSA saying that this number was never assigned.”

After Judge Royce Lamberth granted the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgement on August 30, Taitz filed a Motion for Reconsideration. Taitz included as new evidence Obama’s 2009 tax returns which show the social security number that he is using begins with the digits “042.” “They forgot to flatten the PDF files that they worked on in Adobe Illustrator, and Obama’s full social security number was right there. I provided that to the judge. They posted his whole social security number. It starts with ’042,’ which is the state of Connecticut where Obama was never a resident. That’s evidence of fraud right there,” Taitz said.

Lamberth had contended that Selective Service documents can be used to check only one’s own Selective Service registration. To that, Taitz said, “That’s not the case. I also showed that I used the same Social Security number in conjunction with Selective Service. You can check anyone’s Selective Service registration as long as you provide his name, date of birth and his social. I provided Obama’s name, date of birth and social that he himself signed for his tax return, and he showed that he’s been using this number on his Selective Service registration as well. I provided E-Verify, showing that this number was never assigned to him. This is a crime. It is outrageous criminal behavior for which he should have been handcuffed and moved from the White House to the Big House, and only because we have corrupt judges and congressmen is this going on.”

Taitz stated that if the federal case is dismissed, the unrelated state case will continue. The latter is based on the state UIPA statute, while the federal case is based on the federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

When The Post & Email asked Taitz if the attorneys for the Department of Health have any other strategy other than claiming “privacy,” she answered, “Their strategy is that all of our judges are equally corrupt. There is nothing else aside from utter corruption that is working in Obama’s favor. The only reason he is being protected and is able to get away with the crime of the century for two and a half years is because of corrupt judges.”

Taitz also said that the United States’ economic climate is deteriorating and that “there is serious discontent with his policies on both sides of the aisle.” Citing foreclosures and increasing numbers of people sinking into poverty, she stated she is hoping that one judge will say, “I’m not afraid of persecution; I’m not afraid that they’re going to go after me; I’m going to do the right thing; I will follow the law and the Constitution.”

Recently singer Pat Boone stated publicly that he believes that Obama was born in Kenya and that the image released on April 27 is “created.” Boone stated that he has visited Kenya “about a year and a half ago” and that “everybody there says, ‘You know, your president was born here.’” Boone described the birth certificate as “a photoshopped fraud.”

Taitz confirmed that she will be meeting with key people in Congress on Thursday, September 22, 2011, but was unable to give details at this time.

She is asking that people call their representatives in Congress to arrange meetings with them. “I’m trying to see as many congressmen and senators as possible. I’m asking supporters to call; don’t write. I’m looking for people to visit the Washington offices of their congressmen and senators if they happen to be in Washington, DC. If they’re not in Washington, DC, call and be persistent. Stay on the line and provide information that we have clear evidence of treason committed; we have a person with a stolen social security number sitting in the White House; we have his tax returns which he signed himself showing a Connecticut social security number even though he was never a resident of Connecticut. E-Verify shows that this number was never assigned to him. It is extremely important for people call and stay on the line until they can get me an appointment with their congressman or senator, and let those congressmen and senators know that if they refuse to cooperate and prosecute this crime of the century, this clear evidence of treason, social security fraud and election fraud, then sooner or later, they will be prosecuted together with Obama and others.”
What Will It Take?


by One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Two U.S. embassies were bombed on August 7, 1998 in Tanzania and Kenya, respectively, believed to have been carried out by the group Egyptian Islamic Jihad.

(Sep. 18, 2011) — No, seriously, what will it take? We’ve been through the Marine barracks suicide bombing in Lebanon, the Lockerbie plane crash, the embassies in Africa blown to bits, the World Trade Center in 1993, planes flying into things in 2001, Fort Hood and so forth, yet Americans see nothing to be concerned about the Muslims amongst us as more and more arrive daily, some via planes, others sneaking over borders. Americans turn a blind eye to the fact that that our prison system is nothing more than Muslim recruitment centers and remain complete oblivious to the mortal danger that we are putting ourselves in.

From Michael Savage on the West Coast and James David Manning on the East, and from people like me in the middle of America, explaining, telling, cajoling fellow Americans to please pay attention, business isn’t business as usual, politics isn’t politics as usual, and the news isn’t the news as usual: America, in fact, is in the unusual condition of having our enemy in every facet of America, from the head of government, to the cashier at our local Target store.

Thus far, it hasn’t done any good pointing out that the dumbing-down of Americans has directly resulted in electing a Muslim president and of electing members of Congress who have turned their backs on the Constitution. Stating facts has been a complete waste of time: “Oh, he showed his birth certificate; it was posted on the web.” Some Obama supporter did post Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth on the web; the only trouble was that it was proven to be a fake. Too difficult? Well, then, how does one explain away the false Social Security number the clown in the White House is using? Can one explain Obama’s multiple aliases, addresses, and Social Security numbers?

But this Obama clown isn’t funny, not by a long shot. He has been backed by billions of dollars to make the United States Constitution nothing more than an asterisk in some future publication which some sensor missed, because if the Muslims take over, our libraries will be decimated, our advancements in Civil Rights will be for naught, and all of the deaths to protect liberty and freedom will have been in vain. But try telling that to the hostesses on The View, for instance.

There will be no prizes awarded to anyone who finally understands, after Sharia becomes the law of the land, that it will be too late to save our country. How many women will have to be “honor killed” before they all understand that wearing the hijab is not optional? How many fingernails will have to be pulled out by a pair of pliers before women stop using fingernail polish? How many members of NOW are just as in the dark as the majority of American Jews? How many? Thousands? Millions?

We plead: we offer facts, not opinion. It is not my opinion that Islam is our enemy. It’s not my opinion that the Muslims in the United States are not here for the freedom to wear a miniskirt or go to a local microbrewery or to assimilate the American dream. It’s not my opinion that the educational system in America is graduating people with LESS knowledge than ten, twenty, or even thirty years ago, and it’s not my opinion that the Main Stream Media do not report the news, but rather the garbage that the Obama regime wants you to believe. Facts are not opinion. So what will it take to convince people of the truth when they refuse to believe in Truth? To believe that Obama is nothing more than a cheap lie? What will it take? Yet another tall building rammed with innocents? Another Fort Hood? When we finally wake up and realize it’s too late, is that what it’ll take?

Saturday, September 17, 2011

The Three Most Significant Obama Eligibility Hurdles


by Sharon Rondeau

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Is his birth certificate authentic? Does his birthplace matter?

(Sep. 15, 2011) — The three major reasons why Barack Hussein Obama is not eligible to the U.S. presidency are:

1. Obama’s father was a foreign national and not a U.S. citizen. Extensive research has shown that the citizenship of the parents, or at least the father, is vital to the child’s being a “natural born Citizen,” as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

This historical fact has been obscured and obliterated by those who support Obama’s faux presidency, perhaps purposely confusing “native born,” or born within the physical boundaries of the United States, with “natural born,” which means owing no allegiance to any other country. John Jay, one of the founding fathers, had been particularly concerned with foreign influence on the offices of the president and vice president. In order to be “natural born,” a person must have descended from parents, or at least a father, who was a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth. The parents’ citizenship could have come about by their having been natural born Citizens themselves or having come legally to the United States and gone through the naturalization process legislated by Congress.

Obama himself has stated that he was born a British subject, as the British Nationality Act of 1948 dictated.

The issue of parental citizenship was raised in 1916 by Breckinridge Long, a lifelong Democrat and member of the Wilson administration, who contended that Wilson’s opponent in the 1916 election was not a “natural born Citizen” by virtue of his foreign-citizen parents. The contender, Charles Evans Hughes, had been born on U.S. soil.

Chester Arthur, who became president after President James Garfield was assassinated, is reported to have concealed the fact that his father was not a naturalized U.S. citizen at the time of his birth. If that was a requirement, then Arthur was eligible for neither the presidency nor the vice presidency, an issue which was raised by Atty. Arthur P. Hinman at the time. There is evidence that Chester Arthur was not a U.S. citizen at all, but rather, a subject of Great Britain.

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) memos issued by Atty. Jack Maskell to assist members of Congress in responding to their constituents’ demand for proof of Obama’s eligibility and that of Sen. John McCain asserted that Obama was eligible because of his purported birth in Hawaii and that McCain was eligible because he had two U.S.-citizen parents, thereby utilizing a double standard. The initial CRS memo falsely states that the U.S. Supreme Court had “explained…over the course of a number of years” that a person’s birth within the U.S. determined his “natural born” status; rather, the case cited, Wong Kim Ark, actually decided on the issue of “citizenship” and not “natural born” citizenship.

2. Having used his birthplace as the basis for his claim of eligibility, there exists a plethora of evidence that even that contention is false. If it is true that Obama was born outside the country, then even his “native born” citizenship status, which would not qualify him for the presidency, is at issue. There is also a question of why Obama appears to be using a stolen Social Security number issued in the state of Connecticut where he never worked, lived, nor attended school and which has been flagged by the federal E-Verify system as “likely fraudulent.” If Obama were a “natural born Citizen,” why are there questions about his social security number?

3. The first CRS memo contended that the Certification of Live Birth which appeared on the internet in June 2008 was sufficient to prove Obama’s birth in Hawaii, yet another image was presented on April 27, 2011. If the latest birth certificate presented to the public by Obama is a forgery as many experts have claimed and which was predicted, then he is guilty of fraud, forgery, and possibly multiple felonies. While the Constitution does not specifically prohibit a person from serving as president if he is accused or even convicted of a crime, President Richard Nixon was forced to resign or face possible prison time following the revelations of his role in the Watergate scandal. Obama has been accused of treason by thousands of American citizens but refused to address the charge.