OMG!

What Just Happened?

November 8, 2012 TPATH
By: Dwight Kehoe

November 8, 2012 TPATH – As the dust, so to speak, settles and many of us begin to recover from the shock and disappointment over the prospect of giving Obama another full term to fundamentally changeour country, many are asking themselves, what just happened?

What shall we make of it, knowing about Obama, all that he has done and all that he could do given 4 more years of “flexibility”, compounded with report after report of an energized electorate and announcements from sea to shining sea of Republicans organized and getting out the vote like we have never seen modern times and hearing of hours long waits to vote and polling places being held open hours after the scheduled closing time to accommodate those in line, and now we are supposed to believe that Romney received 3 million less votes than did McCain in 2008? How could this be?

The reason for “What just happened” is not singular but was a result of several forces, some of which are speculation and some are as clear as a mountain spring, and just as chilling.

As you ponder these thoughts please keep in mind that there is no proof of any of these speculated scenarios except for a knowledge of history and knowing our enemy. The remarks concerning the revolting display of affection the rotund one had with Obama and Springsteen, are not speculation.

Remember what TPATH has been saying for several years now. “It's easy to elect a socialist, but impossible to un-elect one”. This of course is the basis of a quote from one of Obama's great heroes, who proclaimed “It's not who votes that counts, it's who counts the votes”.

RANDOM CONCEPTS:

1. The GOP- Yes, the Grand Old Party has once again proven that they have never learned nor will they ever learn that bringing a down pillow to an ax fight will result in very bloody feathers. The desire not to scare away independent voters has never been a concern of the Democrats and they continue to win elections. What is it about the Republican establishment that keeps them mired in unfair battles by refusing to bring all the required weapons to the conflict?
   That is not something anyone can answer except to say it is just part of their DNA and we have watched them perform this lemming act over and over again.
   TPATH has long been against even the consideration of a third party since that concept would surely secure easy victories for the the Democratic leftists. But, it may now be time to begin that consideration. If the GOP could not secure a win against an opponent with Obama's record, when will they? The answer of course, is, they never will. Any damage a third party would cause, in the short term, could be no more detrimental to America than the GOP has been, and will continue to be. More on this in a future report.
2. Almost related to the above is another very puzzling situation. Why would our Congress not object to a software company, based in Europe, who's CEO donated to Obama, be put in charge of tallying up major portions of the Presidential election vote? It is virtually impossible for a non-professional to detect software programmed to manipulate numbers, even if anyone had the backbone to suggest looking.
3. As mentioned above, how in the world could the total number of votes for Romney not be many, many more than for McCain in 2008? By all accounts, huge numbers of Christians, Conservatives, Republicans and independents who stayed home last election were reported to be all fired up to prevent Obama from another destructive term and chomping at the bitt to vote. We are now supposed to believe, at the last minute, they decided to stay home? Red flag anyone?
   Let's ask ourselves a question. Is it more difficult and possibly more dangerous to bring in illegal voters, have many people vote more than once and in more than one location than it would be to just delete votes cast? While there is an absolute certainty that some of that illegal activity has gone on, the safest, easiest and most accurate manipulation of outcome is the eraser.
   Having had more than enough time to speculate and then calculate just how many Romney votes would need to be “eliminated”, falsifying registers either by counterfeit or some other means and could have been prepared way ahead of time in various Democrat controlled districts.
   And since this would only need to be done in several locations within several battle ground states, it would require a big conspiracy, but not a huge one.
4. Then to enhance and fortify the required edge, thousands upon thousands of people will end up voting for Obama, even though they have not voted in decades. How do you get them out to vote? Well, the dirty little secret is you don't, you vote for them. TPATH has learned that hundreds of lists of registered voters, made up of those who have not voted in years have been produced. Why would poll workers create lists like that? Maybe it would explain why so many Democratic districts were hours late in reporting results. Signing the register book to match the number of votes cast when no one was in the area, is time consuming.
5. Then there was the almost ribald hug fest of the soon to be ex-governor of New Jersey as he single highhandedly did more for Obama's re-election chances than the hundreds of millions of dollars the campaign spent on ads destroying Romney.
   Don't be fooled, the rotund one is no political novice, he knew that even a minor kind word or praise from him concerning Obama's well planned performance would make headlines across the fruited plain. So on several occasions, unsolicited, his over sized body and undersized brain waddled up to any microphone he could find and proceeded to destroy any chance America had of avoiding a future with the America hating usurper at the helm.
   And to have gotten leg chills reminiscent of that fool Chris Matthews, to the point of “tearing up” when Springsteen granted him a phone call, was enough to make the entire country join in a collective vomit. If this so called Republican and rock music lover had ever been to a Springsteen concert and heard the lies and trash Bruce Boy spews about Conservatives and Republicans, those tears he so eloquently reported on may well have come from another emotion entirely.
6. Finally and probably the most disturbing reason for “What just happened”, is the fact that after decades of assault and battery on the morals and work ethic of Americans by the repugnant left, and the changing influx of immigrants from those seeking to make America and their lives a better place through hard work and a belief in God, to those seeking only what others have produced. The “takers may well out number the makers”.
   If we have indeed reached that low point, we are destined for points much lower in the ver near future.

THE EVIDENCE IS MOUNTING...

EVERYTHING POINTS TO
STOLEN VOTES

Written by:
Dave in Fla
Thursday, 08 November 2012
"Dave in Fla" runs the DiF Poll Analysis website
Posted for TPATH November 10, 2012


We are being asked to believe that Romney got close to three million fewer votes in 2012 than John McCain got in 2008.

That's not possible.

This election is a fraud.

I don't know exactly how - rigging voting machines, hacking tabulation software, whatever. What I do know is that it is totally beyond inevitability and into the realm of ridiculously absurd that Romney actually got any fewer votes than McCain in 2008, much less millions fewer.

I hate going down a conspiracy road, but yes I believe the election was stolen, and the implications of that are very bad. First of all, Obama received 10 million less votes than he did in 2008. The part that is unbelievable is that Romney received 3 million less votes than McCain. At the end of the day, Obama won in the 4 critical swing states by 500,000 votes. But it is worse than that. We can look at who voted.

By examining the number of Independents and their preference shift among actual voters, we know that 5 million Independents changed their votes from Obama to Romney. So Romney started the day 2.5 million votes ahead of where McCain was in 2008.

This means that 5.5 million Republican
voters are not accounted for.

They didn't show up at the polls, or their votes were not counted. We know now that no subgroup of the coalition decided to sit out. So the current attempts to blame the Social Conservatives are stupid. All of our groups showed up to vote at the rates they did in 2008. For this to be true, over 10% of Republicans needed to decide not to vote this year, who did vote in 2008.

Does that make any sense?

In fact, it is even worse, we know for a fact that heavy GOP counties were swamped all day. We watched all day as, e.g., Pasco County Florida was showing huge increases in GOP voters over the 2008 numbers. In Virginia, with 69% of the precincts in, Romney held a 6% lead. Yet once a small number of counties reported, that lead disappeared. If the vote drop off occurred, it occurred in a very small number of counties. It was not visible nationwide. I contend that you can not get a 10% drop off in GOP turnout without it being noticeable during the GOTV effort, measures of enthusiasm in polling, or visibly lower turnout in GOP leaning precincts.

For anyone who doesn't want to think that the Obama campaign would engage in such blatant election fraud, contemplate this.

These are the same people who ran Fast and Furious without regard for the cost in human lives, turned off their credit card verification system to allow fraudulent donations, and allowed four Americans in Libya to die because it was politically inconvenient.
Do you really think that massive election fraud is something they wouldn't do? If this is true, then we have some hard things to consider.

First of all, we are now needlessly fracturing our coalition pointing fingers at people for not voting.

Second, we are making an assumption about the make up of the American public that is not true.

We are going to modify our party and message to appeal to a group of individuals who do not represent the majority of the population.

Most difficult to believe is that we are living in Venezuela where our elections are merely for show, and the people in charge of the Governments decide who will win elections. We become wards of the State, which is the aim of those who stole this election.

So how can this be proved? I am going to start by looking at a few key counties in Florida. What I want to see is the voter registration numbers by party, and then compare them to the actual votes received. Theoretically, if this were to be done for all counties in Florida, we could see where the fraud occurred. Comparing the votes Romney received to the strike lists would show that in specific counties Romney received something like 50% of the Republican vote (picking a number out of the air) while we know that nationwide he received 95% of the Republican vote. To really get to the answer, we would need to get the registration books, which might be possible through Freedom of Information act.
Those show who actually voted, by name, and their party. The media will not pursue this. This will take citizen journalists working in every state.

This letter was sent to TPATH yesterday. It has all the points most of us have been thinking. Let's hope Dave in Florida is successful with his several county analysis.

AMERICA
IS IN DIRE NEED OF HELP!

Chris Smith

Can we count on you?

To: Representative Chris Smith
Congressman 4th Distinct, NJ
Re: 2012 Election Fraud
Date: November 12, 2012
TPATH


Dear Chris Smith,
It seems unlikely that you have missed seeing the many reports about voter fraud in various swing states during this past election. If you have, by any chance, here are just a few links to some very disturbing reports.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/was_the_2012_election_stolen.html

http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/in-florida-obama-got-over-99-in-broward.html

http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/what-luck-obama-won-dozens-of-cleveland.html

http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/fraud-in-pa-obama-got-over-99-of-vote.html

http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/breaking-st-lucie-county-florida-had.html

http://articles.philly.com/2012-11-12/news/35069785_1_romney-supporters-mitt-romney-sasha-issenberg

http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/13/in-philadelphia-and-ohio-voting-districts-romney-recieves-zero-votes/

http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/poll-watcher-sees-romney-ballots-changed/

As we all know the internet is filled with exaggerations and even flat out fabrications and as a result much care needs to be taken when regarding or believing articles. Having said that, can there be any doubt that massive fraud and felonious activity appears to have taken place all across this country?
During the past 20 years I found myself unrepresented having had my town gerrymandered into Holt's bastion of liberalism. Over the years when Holt was not ignoring me he was telling me to "shut up and sit down".

Now that this latest round of redistricting has further encroached upon the Constitution by reinforcing the reality that my old district and my new one will have representatives unanswerable to the people, you are now my Representative and it appears, by way of party affiliation, we are ideologically aligned. But are we?

Having received many "form letter" responses from Holt which clearly indicated he had no intention of even reading of my concerns nor doing anything about them, I now wonder if my new Congressman will represent me differently.

In that vain I wish to pose these several questions to you:

1. Do any of the reports referenced above disturb you?

2. Is it even remotely possible that not one person voted for Romney in over 50 districts in Philadelphia?

3. Will you request a full investigation?

4. Will you pursue felony charges against those responsible for defiling our electoral process and committing felonies?

5. Will you allow this outrageous and flagrant attack on Democracy to go unpunished which will open the door for all future elections to be assaulted as this one clearly has been?

6. Will you do anything to stop the certification of this election until there is a clear accounting of which candidate actually won?

7. Will you not represent your constituents and verify for them, that this election was not a travesty?
All of us know that the US Justice Department is corrupt and not much more than a branch of the Obama political machine and will never lift a finger to protect the integrity of our Constitution or our political process.

There is only one organization of power an authority that can initiate an investigation and work towards proving, one way or another that this election was not stolen. That organization, is the House of Representatives.

Republicans and conservatives have long witnessed spineless representation from those in our leadership. Many, many of us have just about had it. That means there may be a massive exodus from Republican registration if we feel we need to go elsewhere to find the leadership courage required to save our Republic.

The clock is ticking and it does not bode well for either our party or our country. Congress has the power to pass a resolution asking every state Attorney General in states where these outrageous vote percentages have been reported, to refuse certification until a full accounting has been done.

This process may well cause contention, a word our Republican Party has always feared, but that fear of contentiousness should be overwhelmed by the fear of losing our Republic.

Without fair elections, the future is lost. Will you be part of history that allowed that, or will you be the courageous leader who steps up and does what's right?


Thanks and I await your response.
Regards,
Dwight Kehoe


November 12, 2012 TPATH

How Did Romney Get 3 Million Fewer Votes Than McCain?

I. Chick-fil-A issues did not need Get Out the Vote marketing.
II. Title 3 USC § 15 Challenge Necessary
I. Chick-fil-A did NOT need any ‘get out the vote’ marketing.
Nor did the two key 2012 HOT BUTTON issues, 1) Obamacare, and 2) Unemployment vis-à-vis taxes.
Two-thirds of the public are polled as being against Obamacare for its effect on healthcare and jobs. Unemployment is over 9%, and upcoming taxes and the socialist policies of Obama will trigger more layoffs.
THESE ARE HOT BUTTON ISSUES THAT GOT US OUT TO VOTE IN 2012, WITHOUT THE NEED FOR BUSING OR ADVERTISING, ROBOCALLS OR KNOCKS ON OUR DOORS.
Secretaries of State in key markets had a computer patch installed that allowed ‘real-time’ tabulation from disparate voting machines. Why? WHY! Answer: So they could determine where and how many Romney votes needed deletion.
Obama had 9 million less votes than in 2008. Yet, turnout was up both in early voting and at the polls. Why then were Romney’s numbers 3 million LESS than McCain’s back in 2008 when there was NO HOT BUTTON?
Dismiss my theory, but it is pure deduction based on an indelible fact about the tabulation patch. And if true, it means the election process is permanently corrupted . . . over.
Why file fraudulent voter registrations and work to send in bogus absentee ballots when all you have to do is lose, ‘in vivo machina,’ just enough of your opponents votes.
The theory can be tested. The Ohio machines (and similar setups) must be analyzed to see if the tabulations can be altered, i.e., votes deleted.
In lieu of paper ballots, we need two counts: One at the door taken mechanically by two poll workers, and the other from the machine tabulation tallies. They must match up within a margin of error.
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9233316/Judge_throws_out_Ohio_lawsuit_over_software_on_vote_tabulation_machines
For a detailed record of the Complaint and Expert Opinion Affidavit describing the ‘patch’ by a computer engineer, see http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/Fitrakis.v.Husted.1.php
See also http://spectator.org/archives/2010/11/02/soros-vote-counters
II. Title 3 USC § 15

The electoral votes must now be counted and certified, and under Title 3 U.S.C. § 15 a simple letter signed by one Senator and one House Member can halt the proceedings to examine the following:

The 1790 Uniform Naturalization Act et seq 1855 denied a U.S. born son of a British subject U.S. citizenship. This law stood for 99 years, untilWong Kim Ark.

• Conversely, a son of a British subject born onU.S. soil was a natural born British subject, under the 1772 British Nationality Act.
• The 14th Amendment guaranteed citizenship at birth to children of ‘stateless’ freed slaves, who had no nationality jurisdiction through the father. ‘Under the Jurisdiction Thereof’ is the analog of its antecedent Act, the 1866 Civil Rights Act’s ‘Not subject to any foreign power.’ It referred to the nationality of the father, not place of birth.
• Article 1, Sec. 8 of the U.S. Constitution gave plenary power to congress,NOT the Judiciary, for the LEGISLATION of Uniform Naturalization law . . ..
• Minor vs. Happersett (U.S. Supreme Court, 1875) defined in judicial notice, i.e.,stare decisis still valid to this day, that a ‘natural born citizen’ was of twoU.S. citizen parents.
• Wong Kim Ark violated Art 1, Sec 8 by ignoring existing statutes, acts, and treaty and misinterpreted the 14th Amendment to apply to children born of aliens. Regardless,Wong Kim Ark did not, nor could not, redefine ‘natural born citizen.’
  Fact: Obama’s April 27, 2011 birth certificate is an altered, fake, and forged document. Fact: Obama’s SS# does not pass E-Verify. Fact: Obama has admitted, in his own writing and voice, that he was born a British citizen.

Can we not find one senator and one house member willing to fight for the constitution?
McCain was booed when he tried to sooth the crowd, defending Mr Obama as ‘a decent person and a person you do not have to be scared of as president of the United States.’ Minnesota, 2008
“Obama is a radical Communist. And I think it is becoming clear; that’s I told everyone in Illinois. I think everybody knows its true. He is going to destroy this country. We’re either going to stop him, or the United States of America is going to cease to exist.”
Ambassador Alan Keyes,February 19, 2009
“Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the electors . . . and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer . . . Upon such reading of [the electoral votes], the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any. Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received . . . No votes or papers from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to the votes or papers from any State shall have been finally disposed of.” 3 U.S.C. § 15 Counting electoral votes in Congress
New York Times WASHINGTON, Jan. 6 [2000] – “Congress officially ratified President Bush’s election victory on Thursday, but not before Democrats lodged a formal challenge to the electoral votes from Ohio, forcing an extraordinary two-hour debate that began the 109th Congress on a sharp note of partisan acrimony . . . a single senator – Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat who was sworn in Tuesday for a third term – joined Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Democrat of Ohio, in objecting to Ohio’s 20 electoral votes for Mr. Bush, citing voting irregularities in the state.”

About these ads

This entry was posted on November 11, 2012 at 6:28 pm

True the Vote

http://www.truethevote.org/
Doing voter registration database research so far the average I have found is about 15% dead voters out of all the names I have checked on the voter registration rolls for my district.
There is a nursing home with 47 registered voters and the home has 20 beds. Of these 47 so far I have confirmed 4 dead using SSDMF http://ssdmf.info/ and Obits http://tributes.com/ . Seven I have found at a different address entirely (that means a different voting district). I have also found one guy that is in jail on a felony child sex crime (convicted felons are not supposed to vote).
Now that the election is over I am going to go back and see if any of the dead registered voters voted or if these people voted in two different districts or if the guy in jail voted. I think it would be a good idea to go back and look at the rolls in those swing states for any discrepancies especially since they do not have voter ID laws.

Editor's Note: Also check out... DefendtheVote.com

 A DANGEROUS AND MOMENTOUS ELECTION
IS

STRAIGHT AHEAD

October 1, 2012 TPATH
By Dwight Kehoe

Darlene Ewing- Dallas County Democrat Chairman
HYPOCRITE and LIAR

October 1, 2012 TPATH-
THREE ISSUES POINTING TO ONE BIG NIGHTMARE

1. - What you will see when you view the video linked here, is not only happening in Texas, but all across this country.  These criminals speak of "voter suppression" by the Republicans, while presenting zero proof and at the same time boldly and unabashedly lie when they say there is no evidence of people voting illegally.

After listening to this political hack, the reporter needed  to ask her these questions, of course he didn't, so I will.

1)  Miss Ewing, why would you not want the deceased to be removed from the registration roles? 
2) What dead person would be denied his/her right to vote?
3) Why would you campaign to keep those names on the list if you did not intend to use them in some illegal way?


2. - Now watch this video by Bradlee Dean and see if Ms. Ewing's comments about voter fraud are even remotely honest.



3. - The third and most scary point is made up of several parts, but explicitly tied together.  Much has been said and reported on the over 900 executive orders Obama has signed in his 4 years of destroying our country, and even though many of those were actually continuations and embellishments of previous EOs, the ones he has authored and signed, are frightening.

One after another of these executive orders give the President the authority to end every individual right afforded to us by our Constitution and with no controlling parameters.  Just his decision. This would be dangerous enough with a normal President, but in the hands of this one, it will be devastating.

And one very disturbing Executive Order he just signed, Executive Order 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of "increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis".

Can anyone deny that condition exists now, at this very moment?

Now, couple that information with the history of leftist governments and mass murder of their own citizens in order to stay in power, the Executive Orders which allow for the end of civil rights, along with reports that have been sent to TPATH that Obama and his Marxist cronies, unions such as SEIU and other leftist groups, have organized to the point where 250,000 people will claim they were denied the right to vote if Obama loses on November 6th.

Along with "international tensions, economic crisis and massive numbers of American voters being denied the right to vote, how far off would Executive Order 11051 be?

We need to stay vigilant, but it may be too late.  You need also to prepare. It could get very ugly.