Obama Serves 14-State Governors With Warnings of Arrest: And why is this not front page news?

Tuesday, May 7, 2013 11:57

(Before It's News)

by Ken Larive

Barack Hussein Obama had served 14-State Governors in the United States, National Security Letters (NSLs) warning that the Governor’s actions in attempting to form “State Defense Forces” needs to be halted “immediately” or they will face arrest for the crime of treason. The employment of NSLs was authorized by the Patriot Act introduced by George W. Bush. Contained within the section related to these letters, it is forbidden for anyone receiving a NSL warning to even acknowledge the existence of said communication.

Obama is angered by the several State Governors who have reestablished “State Defense Forces.” These forces are described as: “State Defense Forces (also known as State Guards, State Military Reserves, State Militias) in the United States are military units that operate under the sole authority of a state government; they are not regulated by the National Guard Bureau nor are they part of the Army National Guard of the United States. State Defense Forces are authorized by state and federal law and are under the command of the governor of each state. State Defense Forces are distinct from their state’s National Guard in that they cannot become federal entities.”
Mr. Obama is fearful of these State Defense Forces, in that he does not have control of said forces, and with the U.S. Military stretched to near breaking from multiple deployments and theatre actions in Iraq and Afghanistan, these State military forces would be under the direct command and authority of the Governors in which states have said forces. In essence, the Governors would have “de facto control” of the United States.
The two Governors leading this move are: Tim Pawlenty, Governor of Minnesota; and Rick Perry, Governor of Texas. Both of these State Governors stated they have: “…deep fear the President is destroying their Nation.” Governor Pawlenty’s fear of Obama is that since Obama took office he has appeased America’s enemies and has shunned some of America’s strongest allies, especially Israel. Governor Perry has declared that Obama is punishing his State of Texas by dumping tens-of-thousands of illegal Mexican immigrants into the cities and small towns of Texas. Governor Perry further recently stated: “If Barack Obama’s Washington doesn’t stop being so oppressive, Texans might feel compelled to renounce their American citizenry and secede from the union.”
Obama fearing a revolution against him by the states, has moved swiftly by nationalizing nearly all National Guard Forces in multiple states; Georgia, Alabama, Kansas, Minnesota, Tennessee, Virginia, Louisiana, South Carolina – to name a few. The Governors of the Great States of Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia still have under their Command-and-Control the State Defense Forces to go against U.S. Federal forces should the need arise. Also important to note: There are NO U.S. laws prohibiting National Guard troops from also joining their State’s Defense Forces. This dilemma occurred during the Civil War with many “citizen soldiers” choosing to serve their states instead of the Federal Government.
This is a fluid and still developing situation that warrants close attention.

Source: http://itmakessenseblog.com/2013/05/07/obama-serves-14-state-governors-with-warnings-of-arrest-and-why-is-this-not-front-page-news/

Help Wanted: New Generation of Founding Fathers

By Bob Russell on Feb 26, 2013

This is an open letter to a new generation of founding fathers who I hope will stand up and “pledge their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor” to the cause of a restored Republic of the United States of America.  I am asking for leaders to lead; people with wealth, name recognition, and the trust of We the People to lead us into a revival of  the liberty once known by citizens of America.  It is time for a political party to represent the disenfranchised in both political parties and the Independents who have been disenfranchised for a very long time.
I speak to Allen West, Sarah Palin, Rand Paul, Jim DeMint, Ted Cruz, Ted Poe, Jason Chaffetz, Mike Lee, Ted Nugent, Glenn Beck, Kelsey Grammer, Bruce Willis, Jon Voight, Donald Trump, Thomas Sowell, Herman Cain, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Neil Boortz, Dr. Benjamin Carson, Pastor John Hagee, Pastor James Manning, and many others who just don’t come to mind right now.  You have the money, the name recognition, and the respect of the 67% of We the People who identify as TEA Party members or sympathizers.  I know there must be Democrats who are fed up with the Marxist tilt of their party also.
We have a plethora of people, black, white, red, yellow, and a few polka dotted ones, who are ready and willing to work to elect conservatives but are lacking in leadership. Neither political party represents the majority of, or even a plurality of, American citizens.  Both parties pander to the fringe on the left, the moochers and looters who live their lives with their hands out, and/or the military industrial complex that simply makes money off of war.
Politicians in both parties ignore the two-thirds of We the People who make this nation work.  Corruption is rampant and neither political party has any intention of changing the status quo.  They make their fortunes and live a life of luxury off of the sweat of common people who just want a chance to be successful and become wealthy also.
The founders gave everything they had to forge a nation based on freedom and personal responsibility, with a focus on helping each other when in need. Many of them came out the other side destitute but free.  There are millions of Americans just like myself who have a desire to live free yet find ourselves condemned to voting for the lesser of two evils, evils that are working together behind the scenes to subjugate and enslave us.
The Democrat Party has been full-fledged Marxist for many years now and the Republican Party is running as fast as they can to catch up with them.  John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Eric Cantor, Jeb Hensarling, John Cornyn, Orin Hatch, and the other RINO’s have not in the past, do not now, nor will they ever represent We the People who have conservative values.  They make huge promises to get our votes then spit in our faces as soon as they get in office.
I wrote a blog article not too long ago  reminding people of the promises John Boehner made in 2009/2010.  He has never fulfilled any of them, instead minimizing the influence of the TEA Party in 2010 and blaming us for the losses in 2012.  Karl Marx Rove has declared war on TEA conservatives and all but called us “enemies of the state”.  While he has been forced to grovel a bit we all know he meant what he said and will stab us in the back every chance he gets.
The New World Order globalists running both political parties despise everything our founders stood for, and so in turn despise everything I stand for as a conservative.  We the People need, not just one, but scores of heroes who will stake their fortunes on our future.  The founders did it and won a great crusade that established a freedom and a nation based on God given rights that has been the “shining city on a hill” (John Winthrop) for 237 years.
Republican governors are succumbing to the allure of millions of tax dollars to implement Obamacare in spite of the opposition of voters.  John Kasich in Ohio and Tim Scott in Florida are but  two prime examples of Republican politicians who were supported by TEA Party conservatives, got elected behind that support, and are now turning their backs on the promises they made and the people who supported and elected them.  There are more, including Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin, who publicly denounces Obamacare but works feverishly behind the scenes trying to implement it before We the People can stop it.  This duplicity is treason in my mind, and an offense that should be punished by impeachment at the very least.
During the 2012 campaign I worked with a man named John Albert Dummett Jr. who was running for president as a Republican.  John is just like me; a nobody who cares about his country and the legacy left behind by such great men as George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Samuel Adams, Thomas Paine, Nathan Hale, and countless others who risked so much for liberty.  John Dummett is in this same class but doesn’t have the national stage of those I mentioned earlier.  His platform is one that conservatives everywhere can get behind.  He is a well-educated and well-spoken man who can stand with anyone when it comes to knowledge of our Constitution and the courage to “protect, defend, and uphold” same.  He should be a part of a new creation also.
When you look at demographics you find that 40% of Americans are Republican, 40% Democrat, and 20% Independent.  The TEA Party montage makes up 67% of We the People.  If all 20% of Independents identify as TEA people there are still 47% that have to come from somewhere, namely both political parties. Two-thirds of anything is a winning proposition.
It is time for real “change we can believe in”.  The outright lies and deceit of both political parties has reached a point that cannot be ignored by anyone who loves liberty.  I am as much of a patriot as anyone, but lack the financial resources and public stage to make the kind of difference that can be made by the rich and famous among conservatives.
We the People are here; looking for encouragement, direction, and confidence in a future as great as that established 237 years ago with the defeat of Great Britain and the ratification of our founding document, The Constitution of the United States of America.
You people have the financial resources to get a party started and the fame to garner support from millions of Americans desperately seeking leaders they can believe in and count on.  If all of you and all of those other unnamed conservatives would band together with the various TEA Party factions, Freedom Works, and other organizations we could forge an unbeatable force for freedom that would rival the accomplishments of 1776.  Will you pledge “ your life, your fortune, and your sacred honor” to liberty?  I have no fortune but will pledge my life, my talents, and my sacred honor to the cause.  All I need is a direction and that isn’t available through the Republican Party.
I submit this in the name of the Most Holy Trinity, in faith, with the responsibility given to me by Almighty God to honor His work and not let it die from neglect.
Bob Russell
Claremore, Oklahoma
February 26, 2013

Nullification: The Duty and Right of the States-Pt. 1

     

 

by KrisAnne Hall http://www.KrisAnneHall.com After perceiving a long train of usurpations of power by the federal government, which culminated in legislation known as Obamacare many Americans took to the streets in protest.  They appealed to the Legislature to no avail. The legislation ultimately made its way to the Supreme Court.  We then witnessed a colossal rewriting of our founding documents in the majority opinion to the Obamacare mandate.  Justice John Roberts in a few lines pulled down the pillars of the Republic and set us on the path to totalitarianism. Nearly half of the population rightfully regards this legislation as extending far beyond the enumerated powers of the federal government.  The truth is, not only should the Sates be able to deal with their own health insurance issues, but the federal government has no legitimate authority to rule by such dictates.  Yet, many who vowed to fight it “to the end” have now acquiesced and declared that it must be submitted to as “the law of the land.”  So is this the end?  Since SCOTUS made its declaration from on high, must we now bow to an all-powerful government, from which no area of our daily life is off-limits?  Or is there a remedy yet remaining?  Can the States legitimately resist federal law or is this "treasonous" as some have suggested? To answer these questions we must first understand the nature of the Republic we call the United States.  These States are “United” in a compact, the Constitution.  This compact, or contract, made among the States not only the created the federal government but also dictated the limited and specific powers delegated to the federal government by the parties of this contract.   Secondly, since the States are the parties to the compact and the creators of the central government, then the States, naturally, are the masters of their creation.  That is to say, they are sovereign - independent of, separate from and sovereign over the federal government.  All of the powers not delegated to the federal government remain with the States and the people.  The 10th Amendment makes that very clear. "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." 10th Amendment to the US Constitution It is upon this foundation that the States have the ultimate right to stand against ANY unconstitutional law created or enforced by the federal government.  The 10th Amendment declares that the federal government is to only operate within their delegated powers.  James Madison explains those delegated powers in Federalist Paper #45: “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce…”  Federalist Paper #45 Madison then goes on to explain “the powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.”  Federalist Paper #45 Therefore, the 10th Amendment in conjunction with Madison’s explanation makes it clear that the States’ powers are numerous, the federal powers are few, and the federal government has no business interjecting itself into the powers reserved to the States. To claim the 10th amendment says anything else would make the Constitution a complete absurdity.  Since there are no areas of power that are simply floating out in the neutral zone waiting for someone to use them, if the federal government uses a power that was not Constitutionally delegated, it must steal it from the States.  When the federal government does this, it removes power from the States, rights from the people, and makes the Constitution completely meaningless.  Such overreach sets the precedent that no power is reserved to the States and that all power is open for federal taking.  This effectively nullifies the 9th and 10th Amendments, and destroys the Constitutional barriers established to contain a limited and defined federal government.  What will then be the federal government’s limitations? Nothing but its own will.  “That they will view this as seizing the rights of the States, and consolidating them in the hands of the general government, with a power assumed to bind the States, not merely in cases made federal, but in all cases whatsoever…that this would be to surrender the form of government we have chosen, and live under one deriving its powers from its own will, and not from our authority…” Thomas Jefferson, Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 This is, in essence, what Justice Roberts declared in his opinion on Obamacare, overturning the very purpose of the Constitution itself – to enumerate the powers of a limited central government and bind it under the authority of the States.  What happens when the barriers of the Constitution are completely swept away?  The federal government will now have the ability to exercise any power over the States whatsoever.  The people will be rendered completely powerless and irrelevant.  What will be the purpose of elections then?  We will no longer be a republic, but a government ruled as a Kingdom. “…for the federal government toenlarge its powers by forced construction of the constitutional charter which defines them…so as to destroy the meaning and effect of the particular enumeration which necessarily explains and limits the general phrases…the obvious tendency and inevitable result…would be, to transform the present republican system of the United States into an absolute, or, at best, a mixed monarchy.”  James Madison, Virginia Resolutions 1798 So, when the Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches of the federal government have collectively torn through the boundaries set by the Constitution, and the people have no recourse in the federal system, what is the remedy?  What is the proper course when the federal government has gone rogue?  The drafter of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson and The Father of the Constitution, James Madison speak very clearly on the position of the States as the sovereign defenders of the foundations of our Republic.  It is the founders of the Republic who must give us our remedy…  Nullification, the Duty and Right of the States-Pt. 2         by KrisAnne Hall http://www.KrisAnneHall.com   James Madison gives us this answer regarding the remedy to the states for combating federal overreach. In fact, according to our founders, it was not only the remedy but the DUTY of the states to stand in defense of the Republic. “…in the case of deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers not granted…the states…have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose, …for maintaining, within their respective limits, the authorities, rights, and liberties…” Virginia Resolutions of 1798 James Madison What is this interposition? It is what Jefferson referred to as NULLIFICATION of the unauthorized acts of the federal government.  It is the States declaring, “The federal government is NOT our master, the States and the people are the masters of the Constitution and we do not have to, nor will we comply!”  “Whenever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void and of no force.” Thomas Jefferson, Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 Nullification is legitimate act of refusing to implement unconstitutional federal directives. “That the several states who formed [the Constitution], being sovereign and independent, have the unquestionable right to judge of its infraction; and, That a nullification, by those sovereignties, of all unauthorized acts done under the color of that instrument, is the rightful remedy.”  Thomas Jefferson, Kentucky Resolutions 1799 To deny the States this right is tyrannical and is an unconstitutional doctrine. In fact our founders believed that if the States did not refuse to submit to unconstitutional use of federal power, the result would be the elimination of state powers, elimination of the rights of the people, and the complete dissolution of the Union and our Constitution.  “the doctrine which denies to the States the right of protecting their reserved powers, and which would vest in the General Government (it matters not through which department) the right of determining, exclusively and finally, the powers delegated to it, is incompatible with the sovereignty of the States, and of the Constitution itself, considered as the basis of the Federal Union.”  Fort Hill Address, John C. Calhoun July 26, 1831 If the federal government uses a power that it was not delegated, it does so unconstitutionally. The federal government exists solely because of the Constitution.  Therefore any act that is unconstitutional destroys the very legitimacy of the federal government’s actions and therefore has no effect whatsoever.  Since it has no effect, the States are merely declaring that fact, and are therefore not required to submit. An epidemic of Constitutional ignorance has made it popular in our day to declare “this is the law of the land because the Supreme Court says so,” and since SCOTUS has said “nullification is not valid,” then it is not a proper remedy, some even claim that it is treasonous.  The men who founded the nation found the assertion offensive that the Supreme Court had the ultimate authority to dictate to the States the acts of the federal government. “The idea that the general government is the exclusive judge of the extent of the powers delegated to it, stop nothing short of despotism- since the discretion of those who administer the government, and not the Constitution would be the measure of their powers.” Thomas Jefferson, Kentucky Resolution 1799  To assume that the Supreme Court has the final word on what will or will not be implemented throughout the land is to abandon all power of the states, and throw them into complete submission to a federal power. It would be like allowing a criminal to determine his own guilt or innocence.    “If the decision of the judiciary be raised above the authority of the sovereign parties to the Constitution… dangerous powers, not delegated, may not only be usurped and executed by the other departments, but that the judicial department, also, may exercise or sanction dangerous powers beyond the grant of the Constitution… consequently, that the ultimate right of the parties to the Constitution, to judge whether the compact has been dangerously violated, must extend to violations by one delegated authority as well as by another--by the judiciary as well as by the executive, or the legislature.” James Madison,Virginia Assembly Report of 1800 Even Federalist, Alexander Hamilton made clear that the Constitution is binding upon any branch of the federal government.  To suggest that the creature could overrule its creator was to our founders a complete absurdity.  "No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.  To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid." Alexander Hamilton Federalist Paper #78 It is incumbent upon the STATE REPRESENTATIVES to carry out their oath of office, “support and defend the Constitution of the United States” and be the guardians of the liberty of its citizens.  The Governors and Legislatures must draft a Resolution proclaiming the sovereignty of the state and the unconstitutionality of the federal power and asserting the state’s duty to deny said power.  That Resolution must then be transmitted by the Governor to the Senators and Representatives representing the state in Congress.  Unwilling to shrink from our representative responsibilities… It would be [deceitful] in those entrusted with the GUARDIANSHIP OF THE STATE SOVEREIGNTY, and acting under the solemn obligation of the following oath, — “I do swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States,” — not to warn you of encroachments, which, though clothed with the pretext of necessity, or disguised by arguments of expediency, may yet establish precedents which may ultimately devote a generous and unsuspicious people to all the consequences of usurped power.  Address of the General Assembly to the People of the Commonwealth of Virginia January 23, 1799 When petition fails…when Congress refuses to enforce Separation of Powers and protect the sovereignty of the States…when the Supreme Court joins in the unconstitutional use of power, we cannot admit that revolution is the only solution that remains! Revolution does not save the Constitution, it can only destroy it.  There must be another peaceful resolution; and there is: It is called Nullification. For the federal government or the States to deny this method of constitutional remedy is to say they are resolved to the destruction of the Constitution and the potential of driving its people to revolution. “…our Constitution is most worthless and tyrannical, if the usurpations of those who administer it, cannot be resisted by any means short of revolution. I have always considered the reserved powers of the States, as the only real check upon the powers of the federal government; and I have always considered it, not only the right, but the imperious duty of the States, so to apply that check, as not to dissolve the Union. And I have never been able to discover any mode of doing this, except by the positive refusal of the States to submit to usurpations…” Judge Able P. Upshur, An Exposition of the Virginia Resolutions of 1798 (No. I) The acquiescence of the states, under infractions of the federal compact, would either beget a speedy consolidation, by precipitating the state governments into impotency and contempt, or prepare the way for a revolution, by a repetition of these infractions until the people are aroused to appear in the majesty of their strength.  Address of the General Assembly to the People of the Commonwealth of Virginia, January 23, 1799 Therefore, in upholding their oath the States must stand against any legislation that serves to steal power from the state, thus destroying the Constitution.  If the States fail to stand against this tyrannical use of power by the federal government, they will consent to their own destruction, or worse, to revolution. “Let history be consulted; let the man of experience reflect; nay, let the artificers of monarchy be asked what further materials they can need for building up their favorite system.”  Address of the General Assembly to the People of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 1799

Last Chance To Save Our Constitution!

by Alan Bates, MD

It took two centuries for our Founders to finalize our Constitution and Bill of Rights,  the chief objective of which was to limit government involvement in our lives while allowing We the People to fulfill our dreams made possible by natural freedoms endowed upon us by our Divine Creator.    Every point of the Constitution was the subject of great debate until there was near unanimous majority for  the final form which found a happy medium away from the extremes of anarchy and tyranny.   This was accomplished by creation of three branches of government to ensure that no single branch could go unchecked and destroy our precious freedoms.   Over the past two hundred years America has been the beacon of freedom and free enterprise and thereby the majority of inventions ranging from homes to automobiles to electricity to appliances to airplanes and ultimately spacecraft with the ability to place a man on the moon---and the list goes on ad infinitum.  

But now we have a problem:  a treasonous president elected by fools and who is an enemy of our Constitution and the concept of a government subservient to the People ( link 1 below—‘What if’ by Judge Andrew Napolitano).  Barack Obama  and his many socialist, Marxist and communist friends do not believe in government “of the people, by the people and for the people” but rather an all-powerful government which can control every facet of our lives---tyranny.  He talks and dresses to impress the the less educated and particularly immigrants who have no background in American history and how our founding documents set a path for American exceptionalism during the past two hundred plus years.  (for more insight I recommend the book The 5000 Year Leap by Skousen).  His pathological narcissistic personality combined with his schooling in Marxism and communism has led to his sharp focus on weakening a free America until it collapses in ruin.  Why?  That gives him and his minions the maximum opportunity take total control of our lives.  How?  By dividing the People along racial, ethnic and financial lines to create strife so that We the People take our eye off the beacon of Freedom.  Want proof?  Here are four short examples amongst many:

Obama started with Obamacare which is not about affordable health care at all,  but rather about government control of our lives.  Once the government controls healthcare it can control every facet of your life,  such as where and when you can travel, and even whether or not you can live or die.  Obamacare implements a flow chart of hundreds of  bureaucracies which place the patient and physician in the lower right and left hand corners with HHS in the middle of that chart.   The end result is a collapse of the best healthcare system in the world---the comparison stats are there for all to see.

Obama took advantage of his power to violate our constitutional rights and the rule of law by confiscation of ownership rights of bondholders of the auto industry, giving the assets to the Unions who supported him---a shot in the heart of free enterprise. 

Obama and Biden have committed treason against America by purposefully divulging top-secret national security information for their own personal and political gain,  thus resulting in the loss of lives amongst our military and erosion of our nation’s security.  The examples are too numerous to list here.

Obama used hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars without approval of the Congress to accomplish his personal agenda to fund training and weaponizing ‘rebels’ in many of the Islamic countries of the Middle East and Africa,  many of whom are Al-Qaeda (our enemies); and now we see the consequences of his policies as the entire region falls into chaos  and Americans are murdered without intervention by the Obama administration.  The goal?  To place Obama’s  Islamic friends---The Muslim Brotherhood---in charge of Islamic nations no matter the cost to America in dollars and blood.   Did the Congress authorize this?  An emphatic no!  There is no debate at this point that Barack Hussein Obama is a socialist Muslim as so well described by Nonie Darwish in her recent commentary which appeared in The American Thinker (2).  Ms. Darwish grew up in Egypt and lived in  the Middle East for 30 years before coming to America and converting from Islam to Christianity.  She explains that Obama,  as a Muslim,  would not dare issue an order which might result in the deaths of  Muslim attackers (of our CIA personnel) because according to Islamic doctrine,  one Muslim cannot kill another unless it is to defend the name of  Allah.    And then there is ‘Taqiyya’---meaning Muslims may lie to others if it helps them to achieve their long term goal of the global caliphate (of Islam) worldwide.   This is how Islamists have infiltrated the continent of Europe and now more forceful push to instill Sharia law in many of those nations.   Islam idolizes Allah and socialists are atheists;  a  combination of the two is the most dangerous threat to America and the religions of Christianity and Judaism.  Obama is that combination according to Ms. Darwish.   Need more evidence?  He allows members of the Muslim Brotherhood into the White House regularly as finding ways to empower them around the world.   This is what Obama has in store for America---believe it!  

If you want freedom guaranteed by the Constitution and a republic in which the rule of law prevails to protect those freedoms,  it is time to dethrone, indict and try the America-hater in the White House and his unconstitutional Czars and accomplices in high crimes against America.  This election finds America’s very tenets on the ropes.  Should we fail to preserve what many have fought and died for during the past 200 years,  We the People will be  enslaved by an all-powerful tyrannical totalitarian regime.    Is this what we want for ourselves and our children?  

1.     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBO02pkPUmQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player

2.    http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/obamas_taqqiya_unravels.html

Copyright 11/04/2012 by Gulf1

AMBASSADOR STEVENS ‘ALLOWED TO DIE’ TO PROTECT OBAMA’S FRAUDULENT POLICIES

by Penbrook One

TREASONOUS INACTION:  Eyewitnesses in Benghazi, Libya during the attack on the US mission now say that CIA operatives twice sought permission from commanders to help Ambassador Chris Stevens and his staff, and twice were ordered to 'stand down', while a later request to regional U.S. bases for military backup was also denied.

by Dan Crosby
of The DAILY PEN 

NEW YORK, NY – As U.S. Ambassador Stevens was being murdered by Islamic terrorists during the September 11 attack on the Benghazi, Libya mission headquarters, CIA operators on duty at the mission annex less than a mile from Stevens’ location, were ordered twice to "stand down" when they attempted to help the ambassador's team after they heard shots fired at approximately 9:40 p.m., according to a report from Fox News.

The report also says at least two urgent requests from the CIA operatives for military intervention, one in the early moments of the attack on the U.S. mission, and another in subsequent attack on the annex hours later, were denied by Obama Administration officials.

Even after at least two highly trained Navy Seal operatives experienced in combat assessment and tactical operations tried to tell the command center that military intervention was required, the Obama Administration still refused claiming there was not enough information about the attack to warrant a tactical response.

However, critics among the Intelligence community and military Special Operations command say claims by the Obama administration that information was not available are a lie.  They insist an on-site assessment from tactically trained Navy Seals actively engaged on the ground during the attack is more than enough intelligence information, by itself, to conduct an QRF (Quick Reaction Force) evacuation operation “site unseen”.

"...an on-site assessment from tactically trained Navy Seals actively engaged on the ground during the attack is more than enough intelligence information, by itself, to conduct a QRF evacuation operation...'site unseen'."

Defending the Obama Administration’s failed response to the attack, Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta joined Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton saying, “…there was not enough information on the ground to safely send help.” 

However, Panetta’s testimony is contradicted by the recent disclosure of State Department emails which show that Obama, himself, as well as his staff were aware of the circumstances and extent of the attack from the moment it began.

Fox also reports that live video feeds from two separate drones in the skies over the attack were also being viewed by Obama administration officials in real time, which means they had more than enough information to assess the threat and provide help.

Also, former special operations commanders say that within moments of the beginning of the attack, a digital station-to-station “Flash Traffic” notification was sent to the U.S. operations headquarters in Tripoli, Italy telling officials there that the Ambassador was in peril.

Within the intelligence and security services forces deployed in the region, Ambassador Steven’s security detail is treated the same as those for a Chief of Staff or four-star general.  This means a “Flash Traffic” message must be immediately relayed in code form to the White House situation room explicitly stating the Ambassador is in peril and the message must be confirmed as received by the desk watch officer charged with conveying the message under standing orders to physically carry the notification directly to the White House situation room.

Africom Ops Center, the U.S. main communications network in the region, would have also been monitoring the attack in real time from Germany.  Three networks of communications are simultaneously connected through headquarters in North Africa, southern Europe and tactical placements in the Mediterranean region.  All forces remain on “strip ready” standby which means operatives are able to board aircraft and take off in minutes to engage any evacuation operation for U.S. diplomats in the region.  The nearest Evac Force was just 45 minutes from the Libyan Consulate, well within their capability to have saved Ambassador Stevens and his staff at any time during the seven hour assault.

The events as reported by Fox unfolded as follows:

“Former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods was manning the CIA annex with a small team about a mile from the U.S. Consulate where Ambassador Chris Stevens and his team came under attack. When Woods and others heard the shots fired, they informed their higher-ups at the annex to tell them what they were hearing and requested permission to go to the consulate and help out. They were told to "stand down," according to sources familiar with the exchange. Soon after, they were again told to ‘stand down.’”

The report says Woods and at least two other CIA agents ignored those orders and made their way to the Consulate which at that point was on fire.  The report suggests Woods and his team heroically violated orders and, in attempting to rescue Stevens and his staff, may have exposed something more sinister.  Woods was later joined at the scene by fellow former Navy SEAL Glen Doherty, who was sent in from Tripoli as part of a Global Response Staff or GRS that provides security to CIA case officers and provides countersurveillance and surveillance protection.

“Obviously, these brave men had a good reason for defying orders and engage the attackers in defense of Ambassador Stevens,” says former special operations commander, Lt. Col. Douglas Radcliff.

"They must have known that they would have no back up if they engaged the fight against orders.  But,they did it anyway and paid with their lives."  

"Obviously, these brave men had a good reason for defying orders and engage the attackers in defense of Ambassador Stevens..."

There is much speculation about the motives for such derelict inaction by the Obama administration’s command.  Many theorize the Obama administration may have been using Ambassador Stevens to broker a covert arms deal through Turkey to arm Syrian rebels to help overthrow the Assad regime in Damascus.  Some believe the attack was a retaliatory strike for the allegation by the Obama Administration that it killed Osama Bin Laden in May, 2011.

The Fox report continues, “The quick reaction by Woods’ team from the CIA annex evacuated those who remained at the Consulate and Sean Smith, who had been killed in the initial attack. They could not find the ambassador and returned to the CIA annex at about midnight.”

“At that point, they called again for military support and help because they were taking fire at the CIA safe house, or annex. The request was denied. There were no communications problems at the annex, according those present at the compound. The team was in constant radio contact with their headquarters. In fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours -- enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. Fox News has also learned that two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait, among them Delta Force operators.”

The Fox report continued, “A Special Operations team, or CIF which stands for Commanders in Extremis Force, operating in Central Europe had been moved to Sigonella, Italy, but they too were told to stand down. A second force that specializes in counterterrorism rescues was on hand at Sigonella, according to senior military and intelligence sources. According to those sources, they could have flown to Benghazi in less than two hours. They were the same distance to Benghazi as those that were sent from Tripoli. Specter gunships are commonly used by the Special Operations community to provide close air support.

According to sources on the ground during the attack, the special operator on the roof of the CIA annex had visual contact and a laser pointing at the Libyan mortar team that was targeting the CIA annex. The operators were calling in coordinates of where the Libyan forces were firing from.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told reporters at the Pentagon on Thursday that there was not a clear enough picture of what was occurring on the ground in Benghazi to send help.

"There's a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking going on here," Panetta said Thursday. "But the basic principle here ... is that you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on."

U.S. officials argue that there was a period of several hours when the fighting stopped before the mortars were fired at the annex, leading officials to believe the attack was over.

Fox News has learned that there were two military surveillance drones redirected to Benghazi shortly after the attack on the Consulate began. They were already in the vicinity. The second surveillance craft was sent to relieve the first drone, perhaps due to fuel issues. Both were capable of sending real time visuals back to U.S. officials in Washington, D.C. Any U.S. official or agency with the proper clearance, including the White House Situation Room, State Department, CIA, Pentagon and others, could call up that video in real time on their computers.

Tyrone Woods was later joined at the scene by fellow former Navy SEAL Glen Doherty, who was sent in from Tripoli as part of a Global Response Staff or GRS that provides security to CIA case officers and provides countersurveillance and surveillance protection. They were killed by a mortar shell at 4 a.m. Libyan time, nearly seven hours after the attack on the Consulate began -- a window that represented more than enough time for the U.S. military to send back-up from nearby bases in Europe, according to sources familiar with Special Operations. Four mortars were fired at the annex. The first one struck outside the annex. Three more hit the annex.

A motorcade of dozens of Libyan vehicles, some mounted with 50 caliber machine guns, belonging to the February 17th Brigades, a Libyan militia which is friendly to the U.S., finally showed up at the CIA annex at approximately 3 a.m. An American Quick Reaction Force sent from Tripoli had arrived at the Benghazi airport at 2 a.m. (four hours after the initial attack on the Consulate) and was delayed for 45 minutes at the airport because they could not at first get transportation, allegedly due to confusion among Libyan militias who were supposed to escort them to the annex, according to Benghazi sources.

The American special operators, Woods, Doherty and at least two others were part of the Global Response Staff, a CIA element, based at the CIA annex and were protecting CIA operators who were part of a mission to track and repurchase arms in Benghazi that had proliferated in the wake of Muammar Qaddafi's fall. Part of their mission was to find the more than 20,000 missing MANPADS, or shoulder-held missiles capable of bringing down a commercial aircraft. According to a source on the ground at the time of the attack, the team inside the CIA annex had captured three Libyan attackers and was forced to hand them over to the Libyans. U.S. officials do not know what happened to those three attackers and whether they were released by the Libyan forces.

Fox News has also learned that Stevens was in Benghazi that day to be present at the opening of an English-language school being started by the Libyan farmer who helped save an American pilot who had been shot down by pro-Qaddafi forces during the initial war to overthrow the regime. That farmer saved the life of the American pilot and the Ambassador wanted to be present to launch the Libyan rescuer's new school.”

"Could This Be Evidence of Obama Treason?"

 - The Pakistan Connection - from - The Parallax Prophecies - By Ron Ewart,
President National Association of Rural Landowners
and nationally recognized author on freedom and property rights issues.
We are helping to spread freedom and liberty around the globe.
© Copyright Sunday, September 30, 2012 - All Rights Reserved
 
Editor's Note: Re-printed with permission from Ron EWART.

This is really strange! A curious thing happened several weeks ago. We debated for some time on whether we should even tell it. We received a call from a man with a noticeable mid-eastern accent. Our caller ID said the number was "unavailable". The man called himself Amil, but we suspected that Amil was not his real name. He said he wanted a meeting and when we asked why, he was evasive but said that what he had to say was very important and could have international implications between Russia and the U. S. and might even affect the upcoming election.

We almost hung up on him, but decided to see what else he had to say. We asked why he wanted to talk to us? He responded by saying that he had read many of our articles and that the subjects we chose to write about and how we wrote them, fit right in with what he wanted to tell us. It became obvious that he had checked us out, as he mentioned that he was particularly fascinated by one of our websites, namely, "Attack Watch Spies" and our "Citizen Intelligence Network." He didn't say why, but we suspected that it was probably the word "Spies" that caught his attention. He also seemed quite interested in our ORDCA Citizen Investigator program for some reason and asked a few questions about it. As near as we could tell, what he seemed to be inferring was that he thought, if we wrote his story as a nationally known author, we would do justice to what he was about to reveal to us.

  No matter what his motives were for contacting us, it still didn't make any sense and red flags went up and alarm bells in our head started to go off. The question that came to mind next was, were we being duped? But alas, our curiosity got the best of us and we agreed to meet him, even though we had an uneasy sense of foreboding about the whole affair. It is extremely rare for us to get this kind of international attention, even though we hear from individuals from almost every country. As skeptical as we were, nevertheless our "journalistic" ears pricked up on the potential for a "scoop", as remote as it might be. We agreed that the meeting place had to be public and we chose a small, obscure restaurant in downtown Seattle. He seemed to know Seattle quite well. We asked how we would recognize him and he said it would be easy. He would be the only one dressed in an Arab headdress and white robe, sporting a heavy, greying beard. We were further intrigued by this revelation. We even thought at the time that maybe we should report this event to the authorities, but decided to wait until after the meeting. When the day came to meet him, we were very tempted to cancel the whole thing and just not show up, but again we were so curious at the prospects that any thoughts of canceling were quickly quelled.

We arrived at the restaurant around 1:30 in the afternoon and found he was already there. And he was absolutely right. We had no trouble recognizing him at all. There he was in his Arab splendor, sitting alone at a table next to the window, as if he had just rode in off the desert on a camel. For all we knew, he could have been the King of Saudi Arabia. We could see that as people walked by the window, they would suddenly stop and look in, with puzzled looks on their faces. Obviously, this was an unusual sight for the streets of Seattle. In any event, he ignored their interest in him. To us, he looked so out of place, but he seemed oblivious to the contrast he presented with the other customers and the passerby's. He sat upright and proud, drinking a cup of what we assumed was coffee. He seemed to be quite comfortable and at home in this Seattle restaurant. We walked over, pulled out a chair and took a seat at his table. As we sat down, he looked up and offered his hand. We shook hands in what could only appear to others as a very unusual meeting of two vastly different cultures.

We wondered if we were being watched? As we opened our mouth to speak and before we could get a word out, he placed his index finger over his tight-lipped mouth as a signal to say nothing. Then he started to unravel his story. His broken English was a little hard to interpret but the gist of what he said literally shook us to the core. As he spoke in hushed tones, his deep-set eyes were slowly probing the restaurant and outside the window as if he was looking to see if anyone else was watching. We couldn't help having an uneasy feeling that this meeting was not going unnoticed and we imagined inquisitive eyes looking at us from all directions. An occasional curious glance in our direction from some of the other patrons in the restaurant, confirmed that it was not our imagination.

Amil began by telling us that his brother was not only on the Partridge hunt with Barack Obama when Obama visited Pakistan in 1981, but he also attended high-level meetings with Obama and Obama's host, Muhammed Hasan Chandio, as well as other dignitaries of the Pakistani government. Representatives from other governments, most notably Russians, were also present at some of those meetings. The Chandio family, evidently, were large landowners in the region that Obama visited and appeared to have great political influence in the country. From what we learned from a few sources, one of the Chandio's is a financial consultant in New York and purportedly a donor to Obama's campaign. Some of Obama's other hosts in Pakistan included a son of a Pakistani politician, one Muhammadian Mian Soomro, who became interim President of Pakistan when Pervez Musharraf resigned in 2008. Then there was the association with Khalid Al-Mansour, senior advisor to Prince Al-Waleed Bihn Talal of Saudi Arabia. In addition to Chandio and Soomro, but outside of Pakistan, Obama was seen with a Wahid Hamid and a Vinai Thummalapally. Again, certain sources say that all of these Arabs have donated to Obama's campaign and/or acted as bundlers in collecting contributions for him. Obama seems to have a lot more Arab friends than American friends. One might question the inordinate amount of interest that Muslims seem to have in Obama, which might explain why Obama seems to be so overly sensitive and apologetic to the Middle East.

According to Amil's brother, at one such meeting in Pakistan that Amil's brother attended with Obama and the Chandio family, there were four high-level Russian military officers. Amil's brother thought he heard that one of the Russian officers was a direct envoy of then USSR General Secretary, Leonid Brezhnev. Another of the Russian officers appeared to be a high-level KGB operative. The subject at the meeting was not Partridge hunting but of a much more serious and clandestine nature. The language of this particular meeting was in Arabic and it seemed to Amil's brother that Obama had no difficulty in speaking, or understanding what was spoken. What was even more surprising, occasionally, when speaking to one of the Russian officers, Obama would break out in fluent Russian. The subject of the meeting, according to Amil's brother, was Russian operatives (spies) in America. Why Amil's brother or Obama were there at this particular meeting, was not advanced by Amil and was left to our imagination. Sidebar: This Pakistan trip by Obama may give new meaning to Obama's "hot-mike" comments to Russian President Medvedev on missile defense when Obama was in South Korea earlier this year. "On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this can be solved, but it’s important for him to give me space,” Obama said of incoming Russian President Vladi­mir Putin, who will replace Medvedev in May. Obama finished his comment with: “This is my last election. After my election, I will have more flexibility." (Oh to be a fly on the wall when Obama was talking to Medvedev or Putin on the telephone, or at high-level international meetings in private. Could he have been revealing American secrets?)

  Amil went on with his story about his brother and Obama and said his brother told him that one of the Russian officers attending this particular meeting brought out a map of the United States and Canada and laid it on table for all of the attendees to review. On the map were red and blue dots around the major cities, including Washington DC. As near as Amil's brother could tell, the red dots were active Russian spies already engaged in specific missions and the blue dots were deep cover agents with yet to be designated missions. Obama seemed particularly focused on the red and blue dots clustered around Chicago and physically put his finger on the area, according to Amil's brother. There were some names next to some of the dots but Amil told us that his brother could not get close enough to the map to read them clearly. That was all that Amil could tell us, as he hadn't seen or spoken to his brother since he vanished into thin air not long after Obama left Pakistan and Amil could never find out what happened to him even after contacting members of his family in Pakistan.

We asked him why he took so long to tell his story and he looked straight at us with his piercing eyes and didn't answer the question. We decided not to press it. Suddenly and without warning, Amil stood up and reached over to shake our hand. He then turned and walked out of the restaurant without another word, flaring his white robe on the way. As he left the restaurant, not stopping to look back, he turned left when he reached the sidewalk and disappeared into the crowd. His abrupt departure took us by surprise and was too quick for us to ask him for his telephone number or his address. We haven't seen or heard from Amil since the meeting that day at the restaurant and he hasn't tried to contact us. We decided not to alert the authorities as we couldn't prove a single thing that Amil told us, nor could we prove that Amil even existed.

Apparently, Amil and his brother are not the only ones that have suspicions of a Russian - Islamic connection. A top-level Soviet Block official that defected to the U. S., Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa, describes this connection in detail, in a recent article in the World Net Daily at this link: http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/a-brand-new-cold-war/. Ladies and gentlemen, we sit here pondering the red and blue dots on the map, purportedly produced by the Russian officer at this meeting in Pakistan in 1981, at which Obama and Amil's brother allegedly attended, especially coupled with the rumor that 20,000 Russian troops are now stationed in the U. S. What is Amil's real name? Did he even have a brother that lived in Pakistan and met with Obama? Why did Amil pick us to tell his story to and why did he wait so long to tell it? What did Obama really do when he was in Pakistan in 1981? Who funded his trip? Is Obama really a Muslim ..... or a Russian agent? Why does he have so many Arab friends and associates? Where did he learn both Arabic and Russian? Are there deep cover Russian agents in America? If so, what have they been doing since 1981? Are they working inside our government? Did Obama ever meet with any of the Russian operatives in Chicago, or any other parts of America that appeared on the Russian map? Is Obama working with the Russians or the Arabs right now? Is there a clandestine reason that Obama abruptly cancelled the missile defense shield in Poland after years of planning? Why has Obama not gone into Syria with a no-fly zone as he did in Libya? Is that because the Russians have a vested interest in Syria? And what was the hidden meaning, if any, in the "hot-mike" message Obama gave to Russian President Medvedev in South Korea earlier this year? And why did the Obama Administration not come out immediately and say the attack on our Consulate in Libya was a terrorist attack when they knew it was? What were they hiding, or was it just political correctness taken to the point of incompetence ..... or was it treason? We have no way to verify any of Amil's story, as it is virtually all hearsay.

We have no way to answer the questions we now ponder. The whole thing is comparable to what Senator Harry Reid said about Mitt Romney not paying any taxes for 10 years, with his shadowy source being "someone" who worked at Bain Capital. (Maybe Reid's shadowy figure's name was Boris.) Nevertheless, Amil appeared genuine and his story had faucets to it that seemed to jive with known facts about Obama. It is highly unlikely that we, or anyone else for that matter, will ever see or hear from Amil again, just as it is highly unlikely that the devious Senator Harry Reid will ever name his source at Bain Capital, which Harry claims knew Romney and knew that he didn't pay any taxes for 10 years. What it comes down to is that Amil's story and Reid's story are nothing but hearsay, innuendo and speculation, without a shred of evidence. However, whether Amil's story is true or not, Barack Hussein Obama is one of the least vetted Presidents of all time and a man with a tortured, shadowy past that reveals much about how he governs. He may have been born in Hawaii but the rest of his Islam-dominated life in Indonesia; his college experiences and records as a foreign student that remain covered up; the fact that no one seems to remember him from college; his highly questionable trip to Pakistan when other Americans weren't allowed to go there; his two books he allegedly wrote early in his life before he even had an adult life; his multiple social security numbers; his long-time contact with family friend Frank Marshall Davis, a known and active communist; his association with slum landlord Tony Rezko and now a felon who is in jail on fraud and bribery convictions; his association with Bill Ayers, a known and unrepentant domestic terrorist who actually killed people with bombs but got off scot-free; a 20-year association with Reverend Jeremiah Wright, a known, bitter and vicious Black Liberation Theologist who hates America; his association with known Muslims during his college years and other questionable characters, leave so many unanswered questions that Obama couldn't get a secret clearance if he went to work for a defense contractor.

With this record of what we do know about Obama, he should be on the government's no-fly list. With all these known things hanging around his neck, how then did he ever become president of the United States with his finger poised on the nuclear, the-end-of-life-as-we-know-it, button? That the mainstream news media purposely ignores these associations and questionable past can only be construed as being complicit in collusion with Obama, or his handlers, in a plot to "fundamentally transform" America to Soviet-style communism, or take over America from the inside for the purpose of implementing Sharia Law. Obama has increased his executive power exponentially in his first term. He circumvents the Congress with reckless abandon and plays dice with American lives. He shoves unconstitutional legislation down our throats. His unilateral, without Congressional approval, immigration policies only encourage more illegal aliens to cross our borders and start feeding off of American generosity. He lies more than he tells the truth. Barack Hussein Obama is, by far, the most dangerous and devious man ever to become President of the United States of America.

If he is re-elected, the damage he can do to America in the next four years could turn sinister and deadly ..... for all Americans, as well as American freedom, security and sovereignty. Obama is so evil and so without conscience that he would sell America down the river, if it suited his purposes. To re-elect him is virtual national suicide and probably will spell the end of the greatest experiment with freedom since the dawn of civilization. If you really want to know how dangerous this man is, we encourage you to watch the video put out by a Navy Seal at this link. http://www.youtube.com/v/X-Xfti7qtT0?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0 And there is more interesting information at the following link about the Obama-Islamic connection and the source appears to be Valerie Jarrett's Father-in Law, the same Valerie Jarrett that is the closest advisor to President Obama. http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2012/09/bombshell-obama-vetting-1979-newspaper-article-by-valerie-jarrett-father-in-law-reveals-start-of-arab-purchase-of-u-s-presidency-2491770.html

We can't independently verify any of this, but this damning information raises very serious questions about Obama, that should be answered. So, in closing we must ask, is any of Amil's alleged story we just revealed, evidence of Obama treason? We will probably never know. Only Obama knows what he did for those three weeks in Pakistan in 1981, but Obama isn't talking and for some inexplicable and suspicious reason, no one is investigating his Pakistan trip, or anything else about Obama and very few seem to care, in this all-important election year with just a little over 30 days to go, an election year that could mean life or death itself for America and freedom.

But the real question is, when is Mitt Romney going to come down hard on Obama with these very disturbing questions about Obama's Russian, Islamic and domestic terrorist associations and the revelations of his shadowy past? If he does not, "The Parallax Prophecies" predicts that Obama will be re-elected.

New Hampshire State Representative Charges Obama with treason!


Open letter to all Members of Congress,

"IT IS TIME TO MAKE UP YOUR MIND"
I am formally asking you to bring a commission of treason against Mr. Barack Hussein Obama.

We have a President who allows our borders to be violated by illegals of any country while we are at war. He allows them work permits, access to our services and when apprehended by law enforcement refuses to have them jailed or deported. Barack Hussein Obama has crossed the line, and under Article III, Section 3 of our Constitution is guilty of treason by giving aid and comfort to the enemy and attempting to overthrow our government from within.

Now is the time for members of Congress to finally do your Constitutional duty and hold Barack Hussein Obama accountable for his crimes against America. Mr. Obama is a fraudulent president who is selling out America.

It's time Mr. Obama is called accountable for his treasonous actions. I can only hope our members of Congress have the intestinal fortitude to do what needs to be done. It is time to make up your mind "Do you stand with this fraud and treasonous president or with the American people and our Constitution which you swore to protect and defend"?

Thank you,
Harry Accornero 603-387-9708
Representative, Laconia, NH

Why Calls for Impeachment Process Are Still on the Table

BUT HOW DO WE CONVINCE A PROPAGANDIZED POPULACE?

by Neil Turner

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.

How many people are involved in the treason of installing and maintaining Obama in the office of president when he is ineligible?

(Jul. 19, 2011) — While it is correct that proper and lawful charges of Treason against Mr. Obama (et al) have been in place for over 2 years now, with absolutely no indication that any action by those responsible to do so is about to take place, it does not appear that the Constitution mentions anything about the legitimacy of the person holding the high Office of President (the ‘candidate’ may have been ineligible and therefore illegitimate, but the fact remains that that illegitimate candidate is now ‘sitting’ in the Office, albeit unlawfully);

And while it is correct that the proper venue for prosecution of the crimes of Treason performed by Mr. Obama (et al) is in Federal Court before a JURY of his peers, it does not appear that we have any chance of getting these charges into Federal Court before a JURY of his peers, even with a massive nation-wide effort of bringing these charges of Treason before currently sitting Grand Juries, at least before the 2012 elections – by which time it will be too late. Any elections under this treasonous regime and treasonous 112th Congress will be a fraud and a sham, and the outcome will be pre-ordained.

And while it is correct that the Constitution does state that the person in the Office of President (as well as anyone elected or appointed to Federal Office – including Congress-members and Judges and SCOTUS, NOT on ‘good behaviour’ “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors“, it does not appear that their Oath of Office expires once they are in that Office (whether lawfully or not), and that any and all failures to uphold that Oath, whether by utterances or deeds or failure to perform as sworn, can now be considered ‘high Crimes’, committed while in ‘high Office’.

The Crime of actually installing the usurper in the Office of President was committed by:

Nancy Pelosi, the DNC, and the Hawaii DNC;
The 111th Congress when they accepted the unconstitutional electoral votes on Jan 8, 2009;
Dick Cheney when he tallied the unconstitutional electoral votes on Jan 8, 2009;
SCOTUS when they met privately with the accused (there was a case pending concerning Obama in their Court) just prior to the ‘inauguration’ on Jan 20, 2009;
Chief Justice John Roberts when he administered the perjured oath to the usurper on Jan 20, 2009;
G.W. Bush who, without saying a word or firing a shot, silently turned over the reins of our Constitutional Government to a known usurper;

They are the ones who should now be impeached/removed from their ‘Offices’, or, if already out of Office – tried for their heinous crimes of Treason.

And since those who would or could properly remove Mr. Obama physically from our White House and incarcerate him until his case could properly be heard before a Jury of his peers seem to have been completely intimidated into not complying with their oaths;

And since those who would or could properly initiate the Impeachment process are by now all complicit themselves (some new members of the 112th Congress may yet be salvageable and have plausible deniability – if they step forward before it is too late);

The question then is, is there anything we can do short of force to save our Constitutional Republic from certain ruin?

The only two peaceful courses of action left for us appear to be:

The IMPEACHMENT Process (initiated and performed by Congress – leading to DISCOVERY, and the public exposure of the treason), or
His physical arrest and removal by someone or some entity in authority (this seems more like voodoo – conjuring up a vision and demanding with all our hearts and minds that they show us by what authority [Quo Warranto] they installed him there).

Someone recently postulated the question: ‘But how do we convince a propagandized populace, so that they will properly intimidate their representatives to do this essential act of survival?

Some suggestions, if I may:

Since their representatives do not fear Impeachment (only they can actually impeach themselves), and they do not fear the shouts and cries of their constituents, and they do not fear Recall, I contend that they only fear losing their job at the next election!

Therefore, I believe that the fastest and most effective way for the constituents to intimidate their representatives to do this essential act of survival is to threaten them with being REPLACED from their ‘high Office’ at the next election. That would be about 468 of them in the upcoming elections.

In a recent moving article by Jim ‘The SEAL’ O’Neill, Time to Reboot America, he admonishes us to start a plethora of causes, groups, and agendas to topple the Obama regime. Everything is ‘on the table’, so to speak.

Therefore, for those who are of a mind that Impeachment is not on their agenda, I will still support and pursue their approach, whatever that may be. And for those who want to help intimidate their representatives to do the right thing and uphold their Oaths, I will support and pursue that approach, whatever it is. All we need is the right amount of ‘straws’ to break the back of this treasonous cabal. I care not a whit which one will do it.