Before It's News | People Powered News
Showing posts with label obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label obama. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Bâri′, Barry, Barack
by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.


White House Press Corps: may I inquire? Were any of you invited to the birthday party Friday?

If not, don’t feel miffed.

After all, it’s long been a family secret.

Anyway, here’s the scoop: Friday was Bâri′’s birthday.

Bâri′ M. Shabazz - Barack Obama’s identity at birth.

Yes, 28 October was the day, in 1959, in New York City, that the man who presents himself as Barack Hussein Obama was born Bâri′ M. Shabazz.

A baby thrice bestowed with names sacred to Malcolm X: Bâri′, Malik, and Shabazz.

Oh so happily bestowed by his mother, who truly-and-forever loved Malcolm.

It wasn’t just the sacred nature of these names that so delighted his proud parents.

It was what the names signified.

Bâri′ - Muslim name meaning “Of Allah”. According to Islam, God as al-Bâri′ is the creator of all: http://www.harunyahya.com/isim_sunum/bari.html “al-Bâri′: The Maker, The Producer, The Evolver, The Maker From Nothing … Bâri′ denotes the way the One [my emphasis] works with substances, often creating from existing matter, making and evolving that which is free and clear of any other thing, free and clear of imperfections.” http://wahiduddin.net/words/99_pages/bari_12.htm

Note the reference to “The One”, a popular attribution to Barack Obama during the campaign.

Malik / Malachi – Names most sacred to Malcolm. “Lord”, “Master”, ‘Sovereign”, “King” … Malik is Arabic for Malachi [Messenger of God]. In 1952, Malcolm requested permission from The Honorable Elijah Muhammad [his Nation Of Islam spiritual director] to assume the name Malachi Shabazz – approval that was denied him. In spring 1964, after Malcolm left Nation Of Islam, he assumed the identity El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/08/books/malcolm-x-a-life-of-reinvention-by-manning-marable-review.html?pagewanted=all

Shabazz - Malcolm’s chosen Muslim last name. It’s the Muslim name his wife Betty also chose. The name they bestowed upon all six children.

Among the Malcolm X aliases certified by the F.B.I. are Malachi Shabazz, Malcolm Shabazz and Malik El-Shabazz.

Bâri′, Barry, Barack ….. Sort of has a cadence to it, doesn’t it? Reminds me of the days I studied Greek and Latin. Studied the conjugation of verbs. Bâri′, Barry, Barack. His past [imperfect] tense, his present tense, his future tense.

Bâri′, Barry, Barack: he was, he is, he will be.

So it was for high school Barry. His past collides with his future. Barry, discovering his birth certificate amongst sequestered documents. Discovering his Muslim identity – and the name of his biological father.

And in that discovery, recognizing “I occupied the space where their [his parents’] dreams had been”. A stunning realization.

A future must be created!

Politics, yes, this is the proper path. National politics.

The very same path that daddy Malcolm had his yearning eye upon.

His son would go one better, though. His eye would firmly fix upon The White House!

But wait. Who would elect to The United States Presidency the illegitimate son of a black, Muslim revolutionary? A man who advocated overthrow of The United States Government? Who openly spoke of his hatred of whites?

His past as Bâri′ would never do.

Not to worry! Bâri′ is destined for great things. His genes, his birth names said so. He will create an identity “free and clear” of Malcolm’s political liabilities.

A ‘tweak’ of his name’s second syllable, and voilá! Bâri′ and Barry become “Barack”.

The synthetic ”son” of Malcolm’s African friend, Kenyan exchange student Barack Obama.

The synthetic ”grandson” of Malcolm’s hero.

[For those of you unfamiliar, Barack Obama was the son of Mau Mau Kenyan Revolution Hero, Hussein Onyango Obama. In the early 1950's, Malcolm was publicly singing HOO's praises in Harlem - years before his son, Barack Obama, arrived in America.]

And so, a future was created.

An identity was born: “Barack Obama II” – a.k.a. “Barack Obama Jr. “

Such creative genius! A simple ‘tweak’, and Bâri′ M. Shabazz gets his new identity – and an unencumbered, bright political future!

With a birth narrative boasting exotic, tropical settings, to boot!

But back to young Bâri′, shall we? After all, it is his birthday we’re discussing.

And back to Barry.

How much closer in sound can two names get?

Perhaps you recall Michelle Obama’s statement during the campaign, when asked about Barack’s nickname, Barry? She stated that its origin was a cute Muslim name, anglicized to “Barry”. If you don’t recall her statement, please, don’t waste your time looking for it online. The clip was long ago scrubbed.

Perhaps you recall that at Occidental College – coincident with his grand political plan to fulfill Malcolm’s Dreams – “Barack Obama” insisted that “Barry” be ditched for Barack? A brilliant strategic move indeed. Barry sounds far too close to Bâri′. What if somebody, anybody, from his past, or from the present, or worst of all, in the future, caught on?

But oh, how Truth endures. Thank goodness, amidst all the deceit, the words of half-sister Maya expose it: around the house, she stated, we called him “Bar”.

Bâri′, Barry, Barack ….. Now, who is who, and what is what? “Barack Obama”, we all know. “Barry Soetoro”, ditto. But what do we know of Bâri′ M. Shabazz?

We know this: Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.

[Wait. Wasn't there discussion of an SSN issued earlier than 1977? Sometime around the summer "Barack Obama" was 14? Let's see. Summer 1974 minus October 1959 equals ... yes, that's right, 14. Hmmm.]

But let’s not let “Barack Obama” distract us again. Back to his past [imperfect] tense.

Quite naturally, you may wonder, as did I: whatever happened to sweet baby Bâri′?

I’ve got tragic news to report, on this All Souls Day: in August 1994, at the prime-of-life age of 34, five years younger than was his father Malcolm at his untimely death, Bâri′ M. Shabazz was reported to have died.

From the Social Security Death Index database:

SHABAZZ, B M 28 Oct 1959 Aug 1994 (V) 34 (PE) (none specified) New York 084-54-5926

Hmmm ….. August 1994: Bâri′ M. Shabazz has passed on.

Oh dear. Whatever will become of all those Dreams Bâri′ was conceived to carry forth?

Not to worry. He didn’t really die. His birth identity ‘had’ to die.

Why?

Let’s see. 1994. 1994. Oh! That’s right! On 21 August 1994, the Illinois State Senate seat ‘officially’ opened up! Its occupant, Alice Palmer – for whom “Barack Obama” was working – could now set her sights on indicted Mel Reynolds’ Congressional seat.

“Barack Obama” was prepping to step out as a political candidate!!

“Congressman Mel Reynolds, the Democrat convicted of 12 charges, including sex with 16-year-old Beverly Heard and asking her to take pornographic photographs of a 15-year old, was indicted on August 21, 1994.”

http://newsbusters.org/node/8110#ixzz1OM9ilHH9

What with his prodigious plans, “Barack Obama” certainly couldn’t risk having Bâri′ M. Shabazz walking around, now, could he?!

A simple report was all that was needed.

The SSDI record states that the death information for Bâri′ M. Shabazz was coded “V”.

V signifies: “Verified: Report verified with a family member or someone acting on behalf of a family member.”

The report is not coded “P“.

P signifies: “(Proof): Death Certificate Observed”.

This distinction is critical. Notice of death was made by an informant who did not present verification of his/her reporting, that is, no death certificate was presented with the notification of death.

“SSA receives reports of death from a variety of sources, including friends and relatives of deceased individuals, funeral homes, postal authorities, financial institutions, and Federal and State agencies. Friends, relatives, and funeral homes report about 90 percent of deaths. Postal authorities and financial institutions report another 5 percent of deaths.”

Once in the federal system, the record was flagged as ‘PE’, meaning that an inconsistency exists between what was reported and what was recorded in the government’s files.

Oooops.

Complications.

And now, since you’ve had the forbearance to read along this far, I offer you comic relief.

The first listed address for Bâri′ M. Shabazz is: guess where?

One street over from Malcolm X’s house!

From baby’s conception in 1959 through shortly before Malcolm’s death in 1965, Malcolm lived just one street over from Bâri′ M. Shabazz’s first address in East Elmhurst, New York.

The first address listed for Bâri′ M. Shabazz is 32-26 98th Street, Apt.1, East Elmhurst, New York.

Malcolm’s 1959 address was 25-46 99th Street, East Elmhurst, New York.

Malcolm and his family resided at 23-11 97th St. East Elmhurst, New York, from July 1960 through February 18, 1965, three days before his death.

BM Shabazz (Bari M Shabazz)

B 10/28/59
D 8/94
SSN 084545926

Residences
Street Address City Name on phone Phone #

1 3226 98TH ST APT 1 EAST ELMHURST, NY 11369

2 32 98 EAST ELMHURST, NY 11369

3 HQCO SUC BN QUANTICO, VA

4 1 HQ CO MCDEC QUANTICO, VA

5 HQ CO SERV BN QUANTICO, VA

6 99999 MILITARY APT QUANTICO, VA 22134

7 HQCO HQSVCBN MCDEC QUANTICO, VA 22134

8 HQCO SERV BN QUANTICO, VA

9 99999 MILITARY APT QUANTICO, VA 22134

Source: Intellius.

Speaking of addresses, don’t you love poor ‘dead’ Bâri′s Virginia addresses?! Fake military addresses – that’ll fool the snoops, eh! Military addresses clearly ‘created’ by someone who didn’t know diddly about the military.

My, how we’ve digressed! I wonder how the birthday party went. White House Press Corp, please, tell me: Was there a cake? With 52 gleaming candles? In their private quarters, sequestered safely away from The Secret Service, did any of you happen to hear “The Obamas” sing Happy Birthday?

2 November 2011, The Commemoration Of All Souls
Published: November 2, 2011
Filed Under: Dreams From My Father, Malcolm X and Stanley Ann, Obama Paternity, The Grand Scheme
Tags: Alice Palmer : All Souls Day : Barack Obama : Bari M. Shabazz : Illinois State Senate : Malcolm X : Martha Trowbridge : Mel Reynolds : Obama birth certificate : Obama birth identity : Obama paternity : politics : SSDI : Stanley Ann Dunham : Terrible Truth : Truth : White House Press Corps

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

WHAT CAN WE THE PEOPLE DO TO MAKE SURE THAT TRUMP’S TRUMPETING ABOUT OBAMA’S HIDDEN PAST IS NOT FOR NAUGHT?

by Neil Turner

Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.

Will Donald Trump continue to call for Obama to open his hidden medical, college, birth and school records?

(Apr. 11, 2011) — Recently Donald Trump has helped to revive and revitalize the oft-asked question: ‘Where’s The Birth Certificate?’

And recently, the Arizona State Assembly has introduced an ‘Eligibility Bill’, requiring that anyone’s name to be placed on the Arizona ballot for President must show proof that they meet the Article II requirements of being a ‘natural born Citizen’. It sounds like a ‘no-brainer’, I know, but believe it or not, there is strong resistance to any State passing any Law that requires strict adherence to the Constitution, especially in this area of fundamental national security – that no one, without absolute and unassailable allegiance to this country, be elected to the Office of President and Commander in Chief.

Mr. Carl Seel, Arizona State Representative, is a co-sponsor of that bill, now coming up for a critical vote in the Arizona State Legislature. He felt that an endorsement by Mr. Trump, considering his recent involvement in the issue, would be a great help in securing its passage. So he contacted Mr. Trump’s office to ask if he (Mr. Trump) might visit Arizona before the vote scheduled sometime in April, 2011, and was himself invited to come to New York for a brief meeting concerning this matter.

Consequently, Mr. Seel, together with several of his constituents who had been pushing for this kind of legislation for the last two years, Mr. Jeff Lichter and Ms. Kelly Townsend, flew to New York and met with Mr. Trump and his attorney, Michael D. Cohen, on Friday, 8 April, 2011.

Some of the results of this ‘very positive and informative’ meeting were presented to over a dozen members of the mainstream media (press and TV) in the lobby right afterward (they were excluded from the meeting), but their failure to report on it should indicate to us not only just how complicit they are in this massive cover-up of the seating of an ineligible person as President, but also how afraid they are that the truth is about to be revealed. Their actions lend new meaning to their most fitting name: ‘Enemedia’.

The Arizona contingent left with a Trump promise to address their issues, his full endorsement of the Arizona eligibility bill, and a ‘homework’ assignment for the ‘contingent’ to get back to him within ten days with a list of the most salient issues concerning the size and depth of the ‘cover-up’ of Obama’s ineligibility.

AN INUNDATION of FACTS and FIGURES and ISSUES

Mr. Trump has been so inundated by facts and figures from patriots (as well as Obama supporters and ‘cover-up’ artists) from all across the Nation, it has now become non-productive to the cause of ousting the usurper. It has, however, made him – and the Enemedia – aware of the size and depth of the wave of anger engulfing this issue.

First of all, let me assure you that the ‘Arizona contingent’ is now receiving the best of information from the best of the best – to put into a cogent, realistic, and easily understood and absorbable packet to be presented to Mr. Trump within the next 7-10 days. It will be addressing:

* The political imprisonment of LTC Terry Lakin in Leavenworth – for asking the very same question that Mr. Trump has been asking!
* The real Supreme Court adjudicated meaning of ‘natural born Citizen’, and why the posted COLB is meaningless and unacceptable. Also, that being born of a U.S. citizen mother only – does not a ‘natural born Citizen’ make.
* How the two Hawaiian newspaper announcements of Obama/Soetoro’s birth could get posted in 1961 – without him being born in Hawaii;
* The details behind the CT Social Security number he used for his purported Selective Service Registration;
* The how and why of Obama’s forged and fraudulent Selective Service Registration using the stolen CT Social Security number that he now uses;
* The findings of ‘guilty on all counts’ of the C.I.A. COLUMBIA OBAMA Sedition & Treason TRIAL (see www.CRS-Reports.org), and his failure to attend Columbia University at all (despite recently posted documents showing that he attended for 9 months in 1983 – fraudulent records produced AFTER the Trial held on May 14-18, 2011, in order to obfuscate and confuse);
* The rejection of multiple lawsuits by the judiciary on the grounds that the plaintiffs, like Mr. Trump, have ‘no standing under the Constitution’.

The executive summary for each of these issues, and more, will be backed by a packet of information and references supplied by each of the experts in these matters.

SO WHAT CAN ‘WE THE PEOPLE’ DO? (and what NOT to do)

Since it has been requested by Team Trump that all submissions of facts and figures and theories and solutions concerning these matters please cease and desist, we suggest that the most helpful will be the following:

1. Go to the website www.ShouldTrumpRun.com and compliment him on his patriotic stand, offer your support if so inclined, and vote in the polls that are there.

2. Tell your friends and contacts that you are most concerned that Mr. Obama/Soetoro has not proven his eligibility for President, nor his authority to issue anything other than unlawful orders as the putative Commander in Chief, and that you would like their support in demanding that proof of eligibility.

3. Tell every unsolicited phone caller that all your time and money is going into the number one issue facing this Nation – not abortion, not taxes, not electing anyone in particular – but to remove the person legally known as Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama) from our White House! e.g. “Please tell (Newt or Michelle or Harry or WHOMever) that I have ($100 or $1,000) to donate to whomever steps up to the plate and demands removal of Mr. Soetoro/Obama for ineligibility – and charges him with TREASON! Please go to www.ThePostEmail.com for details.”

That’s it for now. Please get busy and do your part to help save our Nation and our Constitution. Time is of the essence. (Help TRUMP to DUMP the CHUMP).

In Liberty.





© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

Monday, September 6, 2010

Where is the U.S. Constitution?
Print This Post
WHY DID U.S. ARMY SOLDIERS MARCH INTO SAMSON, AL LAST YEAR?

by The Jaghunter

Why is there so much circumstantial evidence that Obama was born in Kenya, but none that he was born in Hawaii or anywhere else in the U.S.?

(Sept. 5, 2010) — America is engulfed in a national peacetime emergency over the standing and stature of the U.S. Constitution. The outcome of the ongoing conflict–escalating in each passing moment–will either renew us as a Nation of Laws or make plain we’ve become instead a nation of lawyers, a nation oppressed by men.

As my close friend Tim Harrington observes, Obama is a constitutional lawyer in the sense that Obama studied how to burn the Constitution.

As you read these words Obama and his team are working frantically in these first days of power-consumption in efforts Obama describes as the “beginning of the end” of the U.S. Constitution.

We all heard Obama striking the match.

Mr. Obama wasn’t born a U.S citizen.

Federal government officials of every description know with certainty Mr. Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya. These same officials prepare every day for the foreseeable firestorm combats that will pit supporters of the Constitution against Obama and his followers.

Many U.S. military commanders are no more obedient to the Constitution than Mr. Obama.

Army LtCol. Scott Weil considered himself unconstrained by that pesky Constitution when Weil deployed his rapid reaction force into the small community of Samson, Alabama on 10 March of this year in a drill designed to test, to measure and to observe many things.

Weil assigns watch standers to monitor emergency radio frequencies. On that fated Tuesday afternoon, a deranged 27-year old wildly ignited police radios as the maniac’s nightmare shooting spree began, developed, and escalated.

Weil was alerted and reacted instantly by calling local civilian police dispatch asking: “Can we help?”

In early moments of indescribable chaos, panic, and domestic turmoil–professional police officers pray they will never encounter–Army LtCol. Scott Weil placed a terrible burden upon engaged and distressed policemen by forcing a decision in a moment police were neither prepared to make or had time to consider.

More than that, it was the kind of decision that put the supremely stressed decision makers at risk of saying, “No, go away, we don’t need your help.”

All LtCol. Weil saw was a training opportunity to be exploited at the expense of civilian policemen in time of chaos.

The kind of chaos foreseeable by Weil and Weil’s chain of command in the ongoing and developing national emergency Mr. Obama sparked for all of us.

The Constitution prohibits the peacetime “deployment of troops at the local level in response to what is purely a civilian law enforcement matter.” LtCol. Weil is the Provost Marshal and Director of Emergency Services at Fort Rucker. Weil commands this knowledge as he commands his military policemen. It is Weil’s job description. Scott Weil knows his military policemen have no peacetime jurisdiction or police power in the civilian community!

Weil also knows the question of his peacetime jurisdiction depends on who you ask (ask Obama for instance).

Samson City Attorney Neil Griswold did ask.

Counselor Griswold put the question directly to Geneva County Staff Judge Advocate Steven Smith. Geneva County Staff JAG Smith–in service to his commanders who condemn the Constitution–lied to City Attorney Griswold telling the Samson Attorney that no laws were violated. No criminal prosecutions targeting Weil or his senior officers were appropriate.

But Staff JAG Steven Smith knows, LtCol. Weil knows (as a professional military police officer), and I know the United States Constitution prohibits direct military involvement in civilian law enforcement activity.

There exists long-standing U.S. law and policy limiting the military’s role in domestic affairs.

LtCol. Weil violently trespassed upon the Constitution and Alabama state sovereignty when Weil called police dispatchers on 10 March.

Make no mistake: Weil knew exactly what he was doing in carrying out a preplanned response reviewed and sanctioned by Weil’s (and Staff JAG Smith’s) senior military commanders.

Oh…did I mention that Steven Smith’s day job is as the civilian Assistant District Attorney for the County of Geneva, Alabama including the City of Samson?

Otherwise Counselor Smith is an Army Reservist Judge Advocate (military attorney).

Staff JAG Smith knows full well officers like Scott Weil–when the U.S. Constitution is operative-“have had their careers abruptly brought to a close by misusing federal military assets to support a purely civilian criminal matter.”

Defense Department commanders chillingly plan to deploy U.S. servicemen in foreseeable real-world responses the day Mr. Obama faces criminal consequences for his TREASON!
Weil’s deployment of Army troops to Sampson was a drill!

© 2010, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Obama's First Year
Google
Custom Search





Clicking the monthly links will send you to Moonbattery's monthly archive



good stuff!




help fight the media










From Moonbattery.com

January - The Moonbat Messiah was inaugurated before a crowd that made rude chants at the departing President Bush and completely and utterly trashed the National Mall. And that was just the news media. The Moonbat Messiah immediately began filling his cabinet with tax cheats, dirty lawyers, radical communists, and eugenicists. One of his first acts was to sign a $787 Billion "Stimulus" package that promised to restore the USA to economic prosperity by the fall.



February - Obama's EPA began laying the groundwork to declare all human activity subject to Government regulation, via the human capacity for CO2 production, which the EPA designated a deadly gas despite the fact that plants need it to survive. The right-wing began to make jokes about Obama's Teleprompter dependency. It would be eight months before the left would do the same.



March - The Green Left designated polar bears the official iconic megafauna of the Global Warming Hoax, using a picture of some bears on an ice floe to claim that the big white beasts were facing extinction (when, in the real world, their numbers are increasing.) Lady M'Chel put in an appearance at soup kitchen and showed off her $540 kicks. Obama also rewarded his friends in Hamas with $900 Million in taxpayer dollars to thank them for their incessant rocket attacks against Israel.



Oh, and Keith Olbermann pitched a snit fit when Ann Coulter revealed that his prized Cornell degree actually came from Cornell's cow college affiliate.

April - It was discovered the Global Warmists were lying about sea ice melting away. Obama sent Air Force 1 to buzz lower Manhattan, just for kicks and giggles. Benedict Arlen Specter made a principled decision to become a Democrat when polls showed he was cheese toast if he ran as a Republican. Also, the totally free market "don't you dare call them socialists" government of B. Hussein Obama completed the nationalization of General Motors, with the Government and their union allies owning 80% of the company after telling investors who had loaned the companies billions "Be gone, Running Dog parasites! The means of production belong to the workers now."



In response to the predations of the Obamunists, a round of tea-parties were held to correspond with April 15th tax day. Distinguished journalists like Anderson Cooper and Rachel Maddow giggled like fifth graders at the word "tea-bag."



May -- The Progressive Left focused its rage and scorn on a person who represented the most serious threat to the American way of life in all the 233 years of the Republic's existence. I refer, of course, to Carrie Prejean; who received the kind of treatment from the mainstream media Hitler might have gotten had he been caught throwing puppies into a wood chipper.



June -- It was discovered that the EPA was burying memos that said Global Warming wasn't actually happening, per se. Also, 62 year old "comedian" David Letterman took a break from molesting the interns in his Manhattan production company to make some rape jokes about Sarah Palin's daughters; because it's just so funny when 62 year old men make lecherous jokes about young teenage girls.



President Barack Obama demonstrated his administration's commitment to transparency and the rule of law by firing an Inspector General who was investigating massive corruption on the part of one of M'Chel's cronies.



The Iranian Regime responded to pro-democracy demonstrations by brutally cracking down on protesters, murdering some in the street, and rounding up others for summary execution. To show his concern and support for democracy, President Obama went out and bought ice cream for his dog.



July --- Patriots celebrated the 4th of July with more tea parties to rouse a resistance against a president and a congress hellbent on tearing down the Republic the founding fathers fought so hard and sacrificed so much to bring into being. A West Coast blogger found a book co-authored by Obama's technology czar in which he advocated forced sterilizations and coerced abortions as a means of population control. Lefties defended him by saying, "It was the '70's." Not a reassuring defense given their moonbat messiah president's fondness for Jimmy Carter's policies. Meanwhile, crazy, lying, FoxNews personality Glenn Beck put up some crazy story about how Obama's (Ho!Ho!Ho!) Green Jobczar Van Jones was a radical communist 911 troofer. Beck was denounced as lying, insane, and dangerous. Within two weeks, Van Jones resigned in the middle of the night because ... well, because Beck was right. Keith Olbermann demanded that Beck be fired and threatened to engage in deranged, vituperative rants on his show every night until that happened.



Also, a racist Harvard professor got into a dispute with a white cop. PBO... who would later admonish Americans not to "jump to conclusions" about a mass murdering jihadist at Fort Hood and an attempting mass-murdering jihadist in Detroit... immediately declared in a press conference that the cop had "acted stupidly" while admitting he didn't know all the facts of the case.



And, a peer-reviewed article in the Journal of Geophysical Research confirmed that climate cycles are natural and Global Warming is a hoax.



August -- Democrat Congresspersons heard from their constituents on the Obama-Pelosi Health Care bill. Since they didn't like what they heard, they announced that all future contact with constituents would be limited to registered members of the SEIU. The SEUI responded by beating up black people and old ladies outside townhall meetings. One especially zealous thug bit off a guy's finger. Lefties responded with, "Under ObamaCare, people who have their fingers bitten off by Union Thugs will have them sewed back on for free," leaving out the word "eventually."



The infamous "Obama as Joker" poster appeared. Leftists went into apoplectic fits at this heresy against the Messiah, and pointed out that no president in history had ever been defaced in such a horrible, insulting, defamatory way.



The Government began a phenomenally successful program called "Cash for Clunkers" in which perfectly serviceable automobiles were destroyed and rendered inoperable in exchange for vehicles with marginally better fuel economy at an estimated cost of $24,000 per vehicle.

Senator Ted Kennedy died, leaving John Kerry and Barney Frank to carry on the legacy of horrendously destructive far-left Democrat legislators from Massachusetts.



September --- PBO cancelled the US Missile Defense program for Eastern Europe, because he believed this show of "Smart Diplomacy" would convince Iran not to pursue its nuclear weapons program. In other news of smart diplomacy, Obama warmly welcomed Mo Qaddafi, Hugo Chavez, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejihad to the opening session of the UN. Not invited: The legitimate, constitutional leader of Honduras. Obama also declared the 9-11 should no longer be considered a day of remembrance, but instead a day in which the workers should offer the labors for the glory of the state.



During an address to Congress, Congressman Joe Wilson responded to one of Obama's many, many lies by shouting "You lie!" The left was again outraged, and pointed out that no president had ever, ever been heckled while giving a speech to Congress before.

California's farmers... driven to insolvency by a judge's edict to preserve a two inch fish... appealed to their senators to turn the water back on. The senators replied, "Sucks to be you, losers" and "Don't call me, Ma'am!"



NY Times columnist David Brooks revealed that he first fell in love with Obama while staring at the crease in his pants. A deranged Keith Olberman claimed he had the largest audience in cable news. If only Neilsen would count the voices in people's heads, it might be true. Meanwhile, Glenn Beck... the man who always lies ... played tapes of ACORN offering to facilitate tax fraud, illegal immigration, and child prostitution. Democrats immediately demanded an investigation... of the two journalists who exposed ACORN's illegal activities.



Airstrip One officially recognized environmentalism as a religion. As soon as they designate economics a superstition, the transition to leftist belief will be complete.



October --- PBO was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. While admitting that he had accomplished nothing, the Nobel Committee said he deserved the award for being so "clean and articulate."



When word was leaked that Rush Limbaugh might become a 2% owner in the St. Louis Rams, the progressive left MSM publicized a number of racist quotations that... um... Limbaugh never actually said. When confronted, the MSM responded, "Who are you going to believe? Us, or a racist who wanted James Earl Ray to receive the Congressional Medal of Honor."



And Glenn Beck... the man who always lies ... played a video of Obama's Communications Director praising Chairman Mao and licking her lips like Mr. Ed going for the peanut butter. A few weeks later, she was gone. A deranged Keith Olbermann dropped his pants and took a crap on his desk, but nobody saw it.



November -- Republicans handily won the governorships in New Jersey and Virginia, and lost in a three way congressional race in NY in which no Republican was running. The left pointed to this as proof that conservatism was dead, dead, dead! Also, Sarah Palin sold about two million copies of her book, Going Rogue, which drove the left absolutely insane. David Letterman was hailed as a hero for not giving into a blackmailer who threatened to reveal the fact that he had sexually harassed many female interns. The interns were allowed to keep the Palin wigs after their encounters.



Also, leaked emails from Climate Scienticians proved that climate data were altered and deleted to artificially create "proof" of human-caused Global Warming. Progressive Leftists responded that the data that went into the Climate Change models were every bit as valid as the data that showed job creation under the Stimulus.



December -- An enormous contingent of moonbats flew to Copehagen in a veritable air force of private jets, generating as much CO2 in a week as an African country emits in a year, to save the planet from the dire consequences of wasteful CO2 production. And just to prove He has a sense of humor, God dumped half a foot of snow on them.



Senate Democrats finally passed a version of ObamaCare using last minute bribes to Senators Mary "Hello Sailor" Landrieu and Ben "Love You Long Time" Nelson.



On Christmas Day, a jihadist came within seconds of detonating a bomb on an aircraft with 278 people on board. The Secretary of Homeland Security declared that the system had worked perfectly, and the TSA would avoid future near-disasters by making it illegal for passengers to leave their seats during the last hour of a flight.



One year down, three to go... if we're lucky.

Saturday, November 28, 2009

Little Barry AKA Obama (the Kenyan-Indonesian-African-American lad ) Goes to School

The Steady Drip pubished

By John Armor Published Today From Our Writers Unrated

John Armor practiced law in the U.S. Supreme Court for 33 years, and is currently the counsel for the American Civil Rights Union, whose website is at: www.theacru.org. He lives now in Highlands, N. Carolina, and is working on a book about Thomas Paine. View all articles by John Armor

From Our Writers:

It has been almost a year that little Barry What’s-His-Name, the Kenyan-Indonesian-African-American lad has been going to school as President of the United States. This is an interim Report Card to his political parents, the voters of the United States.

English Comprehension: Barry has the more extraordinary ability to speak in English than all but a small handful of students who have ever attended this school. However, this ability to speak in complete sentences, using words that seem appropriate to the subject at hand, is coupled with a near total lack of content in those speeches. A+ for delivery, F for content. As Benjamin Franklin observed, “Here comes the Orator! With his flood of words, and his drop of reason.”

Social Studies: With Barry’s approval, one of his confederates, Little Harry Reid, spent $300 million to purchase the one-time services of Little Mary Landrieu to vote yes to put the Health Care Bill on the floor in the Senate. But, it turned out that Little Mary thought it was only $100 million. They paid 200% more than Little Mary was willing to go for. ”C” for sizing up the situation. ”F” for acting appropriately. As Oscar Wilde said, “A cynic is a man who knows the price of everything but the value of nothing.”

Science: The very week that internal documents in a British university surface, showing that the scientists who most support global warming have falsified their data, Little Barry decides to take part in a meeting that assumes that those false data are true. Barry and his selected playmates persist in the view that science is decided by the number of scientists who hold a particular view, rather than which scientist has a theory which best fits the observed facts. ”F” for comprehension of what science consists of. ”F” for application of science in the real world. When Galileo was challenged on his theory that the Earth revolved around the Sun rather than the Sun around the Earth (the common belief of the day) he is reported to have said, “Eppur Si Muove”–”And Yet It Moves.”

Economics: Little Barry has shown a distressing tendency to equate borrowed money with earned money, that either can be spent for “investment” with equal effect. Even if there were no waste in the spending, and no fraud in the counting of the results, the radical difference between borrowing which must be repaid, and spending of present, real money, would remain. ”F” for understanding the basics. ”F” for application in the real world. Milton Friedman from ”Free to Choose”: “You can be sure that we’ll all be able to find very good reasons why we should be the ones to spend somebody else’s money.” Ben Franklin from Poor Richard’s Almanack: “A penny saved is a penny earned.”

History: Little Barry has given several speeches in class about the conduct of warfare and the manner of ending a war successfully. Apparently, he has been neglecting his homework assignments. ”F” for comprehension. ”F” for application. As Vince Lombardi observed, and Winston Churchill also did before him, “Winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing.” Actually, that precise quote came from a John Wayne movie and was attributed to Lombardi.

There is no doubt, however, about Churchill’s position. Spoken in Commons, “You ask, what is our policy? I will say: It is to wage war, by sea, land, and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us; to wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark, lamentable catalogue of human crime. That is our policy. You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: Victory–victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival.”

Conclusion: Little Barry is not doing well here at the school. Not only do I fear that he will not be promoted at the end of this session, without serious private tutoring to fill in the gaps in his current knowledge, I do not think he can successfully complete the current year. The voters should come and see me, at their earliest opportunity.
Signed:Miss Irmingard Sweeney, Sixth Grade, Unified School District of the United States of America

Saturday, November 14, 2009

When Our Military Is Attacked, Obama Is a Nowhere Man

The American Grand Jury

American Thinker
by Robin of Berkeley

NoWhere ManHe’s a real nowhere man,

Sitting in his Nowhere Land,

Making all his nowhere plans

for nobody . . .

He’s as blind as he can be,

Just sees what he wants to see,

Nowhere Man can you see me at all?

(Lennon / McCartney)

I used to have a friend with a few screws loose. But you’d never know it.

Barbara dressed impeccably in designer wear, and her house resembled a museum. She was a professor, tops in her field.

But behind the impressive image, all wasn’t right. She said she loved her son, Noah, but acted like he didn’t exist. A single parent, Barbara wouldn’t hesitate to introduce Noah to her boyfriend of the month. She skipped some of his meals, claiming that she was too busy to cook.

Barbara called me her best friend. But she’d cancel dates at the last minute for no good reason. And she always flaked when I needed her.

Even though Barbara looked perfectly normal, there was something awry. Perhaps the neurons in her brain weren’t firing properly.

I’ve been thinking about Barbara since Obama came on the scene. Like Barbara, Obama professes concern for people, but treats many with utter disregard. Since both are charismatic and successful, it’s easy to get fooled.

Some would say Obama’s cool detachment is narcissism. But narcissists are charmers; they know exactly what to say and do, even if it’s all hot air.

Others think that Obama is disengaged because he’s elitist, arrogant. The day-to-day grunt-work is beneath him. His motto: I’d rather be golfing.

All of the above may be true, but it’s something else: he seems off to me.

During a “60 Minutes” interview with Steve Kroft when the stock market was sinking, Obama giggled. He wasn’t embarrassed afterward, or apologetic. More worrisome than his bizarre behavior was that he didn’t regard it as strange.

Then, last week, we’re faced with a national crisis: soldiers killed and gravely injured by an apparent Jihadist in the guise of a military doctor. When announcing the catastrophe, what does Obama do?

He drones on and on for three minutes about Native American health issues, even doing a shout-out. In a monotone voice, Obama then reports that soldiers have been shot. He’s nonchalant, flat, as though he’s reporting the weather.

Afterwards, the opinions roll in. Some say that Obama looks down on the military. He views our soldiers as the great unwashed, trashy and ignorant, like Sarah Palin.

Others assert that Obama’s sympathies lie with the Muslims. Thus, he wants to avoid our burning questions: Why wasn’t Major Hasan put on leave after he made anti-American remarks and surfed the web for information about Jihad? Most importantly: what is the government going to do to keep our military people and civilians safe?

True, Obama’s disinterest could be related to all of the above. But there’s one more possibility: he may not have the foggiest idea what to feel or say or do.

He may not realize that after dozens of our soldiers are shot, he should be angry. Sad. Worried. He should feel something. Or at least pretend to.

When Obama isn’t prepped and rehearsed, he flails around like a blind man. He’s clueless, lost in space.

Obama wrote in his autobiography, Dreams From My Father, that he’s not comfortable around people. This speaks volumes about his disengagement.

People who cannot relate to humans, who are made nervous by close proximity, shut down. They isolate and hide, like a snail inside its shell.

This is when my therapist mind goes into overdrive trying to figure out what’s wrong with Obama.

Is he schizoid (a detached, asocial person)? Bipolar (manic depression)? Does he have a brain syndrome? What about Asperger’s (high-functioning autism causing a defect in social skills)?

Is something wrong medically — a hormone or blood-sugar imbalance, a head injury, too many drugs in his youth?

Or is his disconnect caused by damage from childhood, from being raised by freaky people?

Barack, Sr. was an abusive alcoholic and a bigamist. Obama’s mother, like my former friend Barbara, made decisions about little Barry that showed little parental concern, like schlepping him to Indonesia, then back to the States, then wanting to return with him to Indonesia (he stayed with his grandparents).

Obama’s grandfather Stanley was impulsive and volatile; he was expelled from high school for punching his principal.

Stanley weirdly named Obama’s mother “Stanley” because he wanted a boy. He anointed Frank Marshall Davis, an alleged pedophile and avowed communist, as young Barry’s mentor. In his autobiography, Obama reports feeling uncomfortable at having to listen to sexually charged, drunken trash-talk between Stanley and Frank.

Did Obama start sealing himself off in childhood? It would be understandable: who would want to bond with people so disturbing? And why form emotional ties when you’ll soon be leaving?

Obama may have felt continually out of place and alien: black in a white family, American in Indonesia, middle class with average grades at a rich kids’ prep school, and child of an odd, Communist-leaning family.

In Dreams, he reveals how he started detaching. About living with his grandparents from preteen on, he writes, “I was to live with strangers.” And: “I’d arrived at an unspoken pact with my grandparents; I could live with them and they’d leave me alone so long as I kept my troubles out of sight.”

All grown up, Obama remains hermetically sealed. Although he’s been a media star for a couple of years, we have no idea who he is inside.

I’ve often wondered why people haven’t come forth to say, “I knew Barry when…” We live in a media-saturated, exhibitionist world where everyone wants his three minutes of fame.

So where are all of his school chums, best friends, and old flames? The groups he hung with? His teachers, neighbors?

Where are the anecdotes of what Obama was like, his interests and predilections? Was he friendly, funny, insightful? Did he win any prizes or trophies? Pen any papers?

Obama was president of the Harvard Law Review. Yet from his former colleagues we find no accounts of putting out the journal together under his leadership.

He was a lecturer on constitutional law. Why hasn’t a single student come forth and offered evidence like a good attorney?

Why the silence? Could it be that Obama left no dent, not even a single footprint? Is there nothing there?

When I envision the youth of other public figures, my impressions are vivid:

Little Bill Clinton: people-pleaser, Mama’s boy, showoff.

Young Hillary: brainiac, smartest girl in school, bossy.

W: wisecracker, class clown, smart-aleck.

McCain: impetuous, volatile, ornery.

Sarah: sweet, popular, every teacher’s favorite, Miss Congeniality.

Young Barry: _________________. Blank.

Only this: stranger in a strange land.

Obama’s identity seems to have been formed when he found his clan: Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, and Bernadine Dohrn. But these are disconnected people, misfits who aren’t comfortable in their own skin. Their radical ideology arises from rage and alienation.

They, like Obama, treat people with disdain. Rev. Wright damned us after 9/11. Ayers and Dohrn bombed us, even masterminded a failed plot to kill U.S. servicemen attending a dance.

Obama’s indifference and distaste are on display every day. He golfs while unemployment surges. He pontificates after an attack against America.

Why the “let them eat cake” attitude? Is it because he’s pleased that the Left’s long-laid plan to decimate capitalism is working nicely? Is he stubborn, not wanting to do what he doesn’t want to do?

I’d say yes. But there’s something much more unsettling.

He may have a limited ability to care.

Sure, Obama loves his wife, children, dog Bo, and himself — especially himself. And he relishes his far left ideology.

But the working stiff, the heart and soul of this country? I don’t see it. The United States? I don’t think so.

And that’s why Obama should never have been elected president.

A man or woman can be a decent president without getting As in school or graduating from the Ivy League. He or she does not need to have had a Brady Bunch childhood.

The person can even lack experience if he or she is committed to working 24/7, learning the important stuff, and seeking expert advice.

But there’s one requirement that is nonnegotiable: Any viable candidate for president needs to be able to care about us.

And, frankly, I don’t know if this president is capable of it.

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Who is Barack Obama?... And What is He Hiding?... The Obama Mystery Continues

Submitted by SadInAmerica on Mon, 11/09/2009 - 5:22pm.

Researchers have discovered that Obama’s autobiographical books are little more than PR stunts, as they have little to do with the actual events of his life. The fact is we know less about President Obama than perhaps any other president in American history and much of this is due to actual efforts to hide his record. This should concern all Americans! ~ Photos

Most Americans don’t realize we have 'elected' a president whom we know very little about.

A nation-wide network of researchers has sprung up to attempt to fill in the blanks, but at every opportunity Obama’s high-priced lawyers have built walls around various records or simply made them disappear. It is estimated that Obama’s legal team has now spent well over $1.4 million dollars blocking access to documents every American should have access to. The question is why would he spend so much money to do this?

The president who campaigned for a more “open government” and “full disclosure” will not unseal his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records. He will not release his Harvard records, his Columbia College records, or his Occidental College records—he will not even release his Columbia College thesis. All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and he claims his scheduling records during those State Senate years are lost as well. In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahou School, he attended in Hawaii.

Pictured: “Scott & Barry, 3rd grade 1969” Punahou School in Hawaii.

What is he hiding? Well, for starters, some of these records will shed light on his citizenship and birth.

For example, Obama’s application to Punahou School – now mysteriously missing – would likely contain a birth certificate. And, according to attorney Gary Kreep, “his Occidental College records are important as they may show he attended there as a foreign exchange student.” Indeed, Obama used his Indonesian name “Barry Soetoro” while attending Occidental. Kreep has filed lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to be president and as part of his lawsuit he requested Obama’s records from Occidental. However, Obama’s lawyers quickly moved to stop Occidental from honoring this request.

Furthermore, now that at least three document authentication experts have declared the scanned “Certificate of Live Birth” Obama’s campaign team gave to a pro-Obama website to be an obvious phony; we know that he is hiding something here as well.

Over 49 separate law suits have been filed on the eligibility/birth certificate issue alone, with several of the suits making it all the way the United States Supreme Court, only to be denied a full hearing.

What’s more, there are questions about how he paid for his Harvard Law School education since, despite a claim by Michele Obama, no one has produced any evidence that he received student loans. The Obamas will not release any student loan details despite repeated requests from the Chicago Tribune.

Pictured: Saudi Prince Al-Walid bin Talah

However, it appears that his Harvard education may have been paid for by a foreign source. Khalid Al-Mansour, an advisor to Saudi prince Al-Walid bin Talah, told Manhattan Borough president, Percy Sutton, that he was raising money for Obama’s Harvard tuition. Incidentally, Prince Tala is the largest donor to CAIR, a Muslim group declared by the U.S. Government in 2007 as an unindicted co-conspirator in a terrorist financing trial.

At least three of CAIR’s leaders have been indicted for terrorist activities. Al-Mansour’s admission opens up speculation as to whether Muslim interests have assisted Obama’s career in the hope he would eventually be in a position someday to promote their interests.

More recently, it was discovered that Obama’s Selective Service card may have been doctored. Federal law requires all American males to register for the Selective Service (the draft) in case a major war broke out.

Blogger Debbie Schlussel has discovered solid evidence that Obama’s Selective Service registration form was submitted not when he was younger as required, but rather in 2008 and then altered to look older. Indeed, the forgers forgot to alter the “Document Location Number” which shows that it is clearly a 2008 form.

This is fraud and it’s a felony and Schlussel allegations are backed up by Stephen Coffman, a former high-ranking Federal agent. Moreover, the document shows a September 4th, 1980 date and the location of the transaction as Hawaii, but at that time Obama was thousands of miles away attending Occidental College in Los Angeles.

The real reason why Obama probably did not submit this form as a teenager is that he assumed his Kenyan or Indonesian citizenship exempted him from this requirement. But clearly, as he grew older and entered politics, he saw that any documents revealing a foreign birth – Selective Service registration, birth certificate, school applications, etc – would be problematic if he ran for the presidency. Thus, it is not a coincidence that every document which contains information about his birth or citizenship is either missing, sealed, or has been altered.

Barack Obama’s 2008 Selective Service Card. “Blogger Debbie Schlussel has discovered solid evidence that Obama’s Selective Service registration form was submitted not when he was younger as required, but rather in 2008 and then altered to look older.”

Indeed, everywhere one looks into Obama’s background, we find sealed records, scrubbed websites, altered documents, deception and unanswered questions. Can anyone imagine for a second if John McCain or George Bush had blocked access to his school, medical, and birth records? It would have been headlines but as with everything else concerning Obama, the media has given him a pass on this.

Of all these marvels, the latest mystery and probably most perplexing is that of Obama’s social security number. It appears that Obama has multiple identities in term of possessing numerous social security numbers.

Orly Taitz, an attorney who has filed numerous suits against Obama regarding his eligibility to serve as president, appears to be the first to discover this. In her suit, representing a number of military officers who are refusing to serve under an ineligible commander in chief, she hired private investigator Neil Sankey to conduct research on Obama’s prior addresses and Social Society numbers. Using Intelius, Lexis Nexis, Choice Point and other public records, Sankey found around 25 Social Security numbers connected with Obama’s name.

However, it may not be as many as 25, since Sankey also searched using closely related names such as: “Barak Obama,” “Batock Obama,” “Barok Obama,” and “Barrack Obama.” There may very well be some Kenyans living in America with the same last name and a similar first name.

In any case, I will exclude these records for the purpose of this research and focus only on names spelled exactly like his name. Moreover, we can verify many of the Social Security numbers as valid since they’re connected to addresses at which we know Obama resided. Needless to say, there are also a slew of address and social security numbers connected to addresses in states that Obama has no known connection to.

In Obama’s home state, Illinois, Sankey tracked down 16 different addresses for a Barack Obama or a Barack H. Obama, of which all are addresses he was known to have lived at. Two Social Security numbers appear for these addresses, one beginning with 042 and one starting 364.

In California, where Obama attended Occidental College, there are six addresses listed for him, all within easy driving distance of the college. However, there are three Social Security numbers connected to these addresses, 537 and two others, each beginning with 999.

There are no addresses listed in New York where he attended Columbia University, but there is one listed for him in nearby Jackson, NJ, with a Social Security number beginning with 485.

In Massachusetts – where Obama attended Harvard Law School – we find three addresses, all using the 042 Social Security number. After Obama was elected to the United States Senate in 2005, he moved into an apartment at 300 Massachusetts Ave NW; the Social Security number attached to that address is the 042 one. Yet, three years later, Obama used a different Social Security number for an address listed as: 713 Hart Senate Office Building. This was the address of his United States Senate office. This Social Security number began with 282 and was verified by the government in 2008.

Pictured: 713 Hart Senate Office Building.

This mystery grows even stranger as other addresses and Social Security numbers for Barack Obama appear in a dozen other states not known to be connected to him. Again, I am excluding those records names not spelled exactly like his name.

Tennessee, one address with a Social Security number beginning with 427

Colorado, one address, with a Social Security number beginning with 456.

Utah, two addresses, with two Social Security numbers beginning with 901 and 799.

Missouri has one address and one Social Security number beginning with 999.

Florida has two addresses listed for his him, three if you count one listed as “Barry Obama.” One is connected to a Social Security number beginning with 762.

In Georgia there are three addresses listed for him, all with different Social Security numbers: 579, 420, and 423.

In Texas there are four different addresses listed for him, one is connected to Social Security number 675.

There are two addresses listed for Barack Obama in Oregon and one address listed for him in
the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, South Carolina, and Pennsylvania.

All told, there are 49 addresses and 16 different Social Security numbers listed for a person whose name is spelled “Barack Obama.” In some cases, the middle initial “H” is listed. If you were to expand the search to include closely related names such as: “Barac,” “Barak,” and “Barrack” Obama, you would find more than a dozen additional addresses and Social Security numbers.

Finally, the one Social Security number Obama most frequently used, the one beginning with 042, is a number issued in Connecticut sometime during 1976-1977, yet there is no record of Obama ever living or working in Connecticut. Indeed, during this time period Obama would have been 15-16 years old and living in Hawaii at the time.

Nevertheless, all this mystery surrounding Obama appears to be a generational thing. Researchers have discovered nearly a dozen aliases, at least two different Social Security numbers, and upwards of over 99 separate addresses for Ann Dunham, his mother.

We do know she worked for the ultra liberal Ford Foundation but we also know she may have earned some income from pornographic poses, as evidenced by photos recently discovered by some researchers—how embarrassing. The only thing researchers are able to find out about Obama’s mother is the fact she made porn. I’m sure that’s a first for presidential mothers.

Communist Party leader, Frank Marshall Davis... Enlarged Photo

But we also know that Obama’s mother and grandparents associated with Communist Party leaders such as Frank Marshall Davis, a man who, according to Obama’s book, Dreams from my Father, was his main mentor during much of his Hawaiian boyhood (although Obama tried to disguise his identity in his book). During the Cold War, Davis was named by congressional investigators as a key member of a secretive pro-Soviet networked that existed in Hawaii at that time.

Enlarged Photo... Ann, Stanley and Madelyn Dunham

The lack of documents regarding Obama also extends to his mother and to his grandparents. Indeed, researchers have been unable to find marriage licenses for his mother’s two marriages, assuming she was ever legally married. Ditto goes for the marriage license for Ann’s parents. They cannot find birth certificates for her, her parents, or for even for her grandparents.

Even more so, despite Obama’s boast of his grandfather’s military service, there’s no record of that either. For reasons no one knows, much of Obama’s life, his mother’s life and his grandparent’s life has been erased from the records as if they never existed.

But why would someone obtain so many Social Security numbers? According to investigators, those who create additional Social Society numbers are typically engaged in criminal activities such as Social Security fraud, tax fraud, real estate fraud, campaign contributions fraud, voter fraud and so on.

While the private investigator who compiled this list says multiple social security numbers does not automatically prove there’s criminal activity involved, he states that “having said that, I have personally experienced many, many cases where such information has led to subsequent exposure of fraud, deception, money laundering and other crimes.“What is interesting to note is that Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, was a volunteer at the Oahu Circuit Court probate department and had access to the Social Security numbers of deceased people.

Pictured... Barrack Obama and his Grandmother, Madelyn Dunham. “Madeline Dunham was a volunteer at the Oahu Circuit Court probate department and had access to the Social Security numbers of deceased people.”

It is clear that more research needs to be done on this issue. The Western Center for Journalism ( http://www.westernjournalism.com) is inviting our readers to join the search for the truth. If you have any information about any of the addresses listed, we would love to hear from you. To find a complete list of all the addresses and Social Security numbers listed in the public record for Obama and family, please go to the Western Center for Journalism.

Steve Baldwin - November 8, 2009 - source WesternJournalism

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

U.S.C. Title 44, Chapter 22: “PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS” Thanks Daniel Smith

Why haven’t any of you used the simple power of the United States Code mandates that are directly on point??
Like, as in, uhm?.. U.S.C. Title 44, Chapter 22: PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS
[Thank veteran Congress members for passing the Presidential Records Act of 1978]
The statutory law of the United States Code is extremely clear, even often in multiple ways, that:
a) the AG *cannot* represent/defend Obama in any challenge that involves a question of his citizenship, for the relevant statutory laws mandate that the AG be on the *prosecuting* side against Obama, if the AG is involved, at all… In fact, whether intentional or not, Obama and Holder can be hit with “constructive fraud”, at the very least…
b) the AG also *cannot* represent/defend Senators or the Senate body, itself, in these constitutional questions, either… Again, whether intentional or not, you have that “constructive fraud” against the rule of law thing again…
c) there are various statutory standings provided for even “mere” individual Citizens to sue Obama, Congress, etc.
d) Obama’s “Presidential records” are expressly PUBLIC by mandate of simple written law (and, combined with using AG Holder & U.S. Attorneys, i.e., our *taxdollars*, in an expressly-unconstitutional manner, defending Obama in any citizenship issues, then Obama gets to pay back every single red cent of that $1.7+ million spent so far… plus interest and penalties, naturally… plus, getting deported, or imprisoned, or whatever else…).
e) additionally, there are all sorts of various federal agencies/heads to statutorily go after Obama’s eligibility through.
I have detailed and provided the direct links to all of these applicable federal statutes, below.
Of course, we all know that Obama and his agents have fully admitted his dual-citizenship at birth, which precludes him from ever being President, even notwithstanding the obviously-suspicious concealment of virtually all pertinent records…
Who, then, are the lawful United States Prez and VP, per the original Constitution, right now, at this
very moment??
That’s easy enough to answer:
1. Mr. John McCain, Republican, *is* the President, temporarily, until the Re-Election that must be done, promptly.
2. Mr Ralph Nader, Independent, *is* the Vice-President, temporarily, until the Re-Election that must be done, promptly.
(and, those two are not my personal combo pick, but that IS the result of law per the original Constitution, so fine…).

Oh, and no worries about any “vacuum of power” anxiousness, because of this proposed new Joint Cabinet to be used during the temporary period, accepting this well-balanced set of American leaders (yes, every person listed is eligible and legally qualified to hold the position indicated - you better believe I double-checked that, first…):
America needs officials that actually have skill and talent, as our Cabinet - not always a bunch of political flunkies. Further, I have balanced the new proposed Cabinet as 1/3 Dem, 1/3 Rep, and 1/3 all other legally-”major” parties, also indicated an increase in the number of resulting women upon the President’s Cabinet, and additionally sought more harmonious balance within religious and ideological characteristics of the group of officials, plus added geographical and age diversity into the mix, so as to well-represent the vast majority of America, as the temporary power *within* the White House… you see.
NOTICE RE: MDL CONSOLIDATION OF “OBAMA ELIGIBILITY” CASES:
Since, even after allowing an entire year now since the fraudulent 2008 General Election, it STILL seems that nobody is able to get actually serious enough to throw a flagrantly-obvious impostor/usurper out of office, in using the court system and the laws already in force, it seems there’s no choice but to soon enter into each of your own respective cases, immediately move to consolidate them all together under MDL (federal Multi-District Litigation), and maybe also bump it up into a huge mass-action or class-action suit, allowing for each and every U.S. Citizen, Taxpayer, Voter and Landowner to be able to self-join/self-intervene by geography (i.e., by jurisdiction), using simple checkbox “legal standing” forms made available online, and then self-filed per each of their own respective Divisional courthouses. And, I just happen to have a nationwide network of 3200+ online groups (for every single State, County, Parish, Borough and Independent City across the whole country) to actually do it, if really needed… That is, unless I can finally see some serious progress made *by the others leading* in these various “NObama” impostor/usurper cases still active in any court, and that good progress implemented in the most urgently quick and direct fashion, by using any or all of the legal info/ammo provided below.
APPLICABLE STATUTES RE: OBAMA’S “PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS”:
Let’s start out with THE most basic/direct way to end all of this nonsense, once and for all, ok???
A simple review of United States Code, Title 44, Chapter 22: “Presidential Records”, provides what is needed.
Title 44, CHAPTER 22 — PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sup_01_44_10_22.html
§ 2201. Definitions
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sec_44_00002201—-000-.html
i.e., Obama’s “Presidential records”, including all *Constitutional* and similar official documentation, are expressly NOT protected to any forms of privacy or concealment allowed, like his “personal records” are allowed to be..
and, indeed, since the United States now actually OWNS those same “Presidential records”, and not Obama!, see
§ 2202. Ownership of Presidential records
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sec_44_00002202—-000-.html
then the United States has NO possible legitimate reason, whatsoever!, to withhold documentation - from ITSELF, hint, hint - of the question of existence, or not, of the properly authenticated qualifications of Mr. Obama, et al… i.e., of it’s own “CEO”… No, the “shareholders” of America are absolutely entitled to see authentication, proven and confirmed.


IN FACT, it is actually Obama’s **STATUTORY DUTY** to ensure his “Presidential records” are made public…!!!
§ 2203. Management and custody of Presidential records
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sec_44_00002203—-000-.html
and, to the point necessary:
§ 2204. Restrictions on access to Presidential records
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sec_44_00002204—-000-.html
paragraph (c)(1) of which provides that those “Presidential records”, i.e., THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND ANY OTHER SUCH ”QUALIFICATIONS” DOCUMENTATION, “shall” be made public, pursuant to
Title 5, § 552. Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00000552—-000-.html

Sooo.. merely use the existing jurisdiction of your current “eligibility” case, to subpoena the relevant collection of “Presidential records” from the Archivist and/or National Archives and Records Administration, pursuant to
§ 2205. Exceptions to restricted access
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sec_44_00002205—-000-.html
under paragraph (2)(A) thereof, and, VOILA! Case closed, slam-dunk, Obama IS done. Over and out. The end.
(and Mr. McCain and Mr. Nader take over White House power until the Re-Election is held promptly thereafter, as acting President and acting Vice-President, per the original selection process order under the original Constitutional design, as the Presidential vote-getters # 2 and # 3 behind invalid Obama, who is not a natural born Citizen, “failed to qualify”, etc.)
For further pertinent records handling info, see also:
CHAPTER 29—RECORDS MANAGEMENT BY THE ARCHIVIST OF THE UNITED STATES AND BY THE ADMINISTRATOR OF GENERAL SERVICES
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sup_01_44_10_29.html
and
CHAPTER 31—RECORDS MANAGEMENT BY FEDERAL AGENCIES
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode44/usc_sup_01_44_10_31.html
REGARDING CONSTANT FAILURES VIA “STANDING” ISSUES:
Also, after all of these many cases **continually dismissed** for ONE recurring issue - i.e., STANDING TO SUE - I am simply a-m-a-z-e-d that none of the present cases, with maybe the exception of Donofrio, and that only to a limited degree, have even remotely-adequately addressed any of several available, concrete-solid standing postures of virtually any U.S. Citizen, eligible Voter, Taxpayer, Landowner, or the like. The wide range of standing postures at option includes all manner of first-person, second-person, and third-party standing scenario availabilities. Here, for those of you that wish to learn about LEGAL STANDING, are just several online options, of many out there, to begin with:
Sooo, as merely a FEW examples, only, there are easy, straightforward uses of either vertical and/or horizontal ‘privity’ for bulletproof standing, due to the running of Hillary Clinton, Dr. Keyes, and etc. against Mr. Obama for the same position – i.e., “Berg ex rel. Clinton v. Obama, et al.” or “Taitz ex rel. Keyes v. Obama, et al.“ - so as to not even be requiring the person of interest to be the petitioning party, in the first place… let alone the power of using the direct petitioning parties, themselves, if using ADEQUATE standing authorities… written into play… Then, there’s an entire myriad of standing options under compelling various federal officers to do THEIR duty to investigate Obama’s qualifications, see even the multiple *statutory* standings provided below. There’s also other legal relational standings, like fiduciary duties of one person/entity to another.. hint, hint.. And, there were/are plenty of other solid, indisputable, and basic foundations for full legal standing for use in play, including, but not limited to, arguments under and via ‘collateral contract’, ‘trusts’, ‘agency’, and the ‘assignment of contractual rights.’ And, again, there’s the direct legal standings of voters, taxpayers, and each Citizen… the KEY is all is well as long as the proper amount of binding authority is finally brought into written play, first! There is *overwhelming* authority on establishing *all kinds* of standing, so what IS the problem so far in sadly systemic, routine failures by “eligibility” Plaintiffs to adequately address the wide variety of indisputable STANDING authorities???
Heck, I, as a mere Citizen, have full standing by my own Citizenship, and its attributes of voting, paying taxes, Obama’s and/or the Fed’s and State’s fiduciary duties to me, and also as a landowner, if I owned land at the moment.. Moreover, I have standing, again, but in the second/third-person, as “ex rel” on behalf of any other Citizen, to protect his or her Rights and Interests, as their “next friend”, and the same “ex rel” on behalf of any part of Government towards another part, etc…
Remember, you are guaranteed a “remedy” for a wrong, Constitutionally… Gad-zoinks people!!!, even also under the Federal Constitution, there is *explicit* Citizen standing already provided. See Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1… cf. Amendments 9 & 10… see also Art. IV, Sec. 4, first participle/clause. You can also achieve citizen standing through being denied the right to a *meaningful* vote, and therefore making challenge under Amendment XIV, Section 2 (to compel changing the local basis of representation, duh, even if that is not your *primary* goal.. hint, hint..). Now then, go back and read the end of that First Amendment again..
But, enough about the utter joke of standing.. The following list is a selection of MANY statutory ways to throw Obama “out da house”, quickly. Please now implement and use at least SOME of them in your own cases, right away, so that I can get back to preparing other key God, Country, and Family issues (SepChurchState, Creation-Evolution, ElectionFraud, Economy/SocialPrograms, FedRsrv/GoldStd/Dollar, rebalance of power, individual liberties, limited government, etc.), for their actual restorations, via a brand new kind of huge federal legal challenge, to get us back at least close to the Framers’ original Constitutional design and intent, as soon as it is possible for one poor man to get it all frickin’ done, and done right.
Yeah, that’s right. I have chosen to live near poverty for years now, fighting part-time or more for restoration of America.
If you like my help, I could sure use donations, left side on http://unitedcivilrights.org, to upgrade to full-time restoration.
EXISTING STATUTES PROVIDE VARIOUS ROUTES TO OBAMA:
Indeed, a simple once-through, of every possibly-relevant Title of the entire United States Code, looking for the “potentials”, reveals at least a few dozen more direct ways to go after Obama, reveals that AG Eric Holder and his U.S. Attorneys are in **multiple statutory DIRECT conflicts-of-interest** by representing Obama, over citizenship questions, instead of representing the *express* interests of the United States and its several by-statute agencies/departments to the direct contrary of Obama’s legal interests, and even reveals that “AG-Elect” Eric Holder could now be removed from office, for merely participating on the wrong side in Obama’s citizenship problems… In other words, get rid of Holder & U.S. Attys OUT of these “eligibility” cases, immediately, since you now have, below, the clear-cut, mandate power of law to do so!
from United States Code, TITLE 2, The Congress:

–> example - go after Obama’s *Senator* records from the 2004 Illinois election, to check eligibilities…
§ 1a. Election to be certified by governor
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode02/usc_sec_02_00000001—a000-.html
§ 1b. Countersignature of certificate of election
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode02/usc_sec_02_00000001—b000-.html
but see, for “devil’s advocate” knowledge,
§ 118. Actions against officers for official acts
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode02/usc_sec_02_00000118—-000-.html
yet, not to worry!, because the special circumstance is Obama being a U.S. Senator, and under
§ 118a. Officers of Senate
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode02/usc_sec_02_00000118—a000-.html
section 118 actually doesn’t apply to Obama, so no representation/defense by AG Eric Holder or his US Attorneys…
and besides, the Senate and Senators have their own *statutory* representation, anyway:
§ 288. Office of Senate Legal Counsel
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode02/usc_sec_02_00000288—-000-.html
see also
§ 288c. Defending the Senate, committee, subcommittee, member, officer, or employee of Senate
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode02/usc_sec_02_00000288—c000-.html
…but, most definitely, the AG (nor his staff, the U.S. Attorneys…) *cannot* represent either the U.S. Senate, former Speaker Cheney, current Speaker Pelosi, Reid, or etc., when it comes to the question of citizenship/qualification of Obama as President-Elect, but the representation *must* be ONLY the Senate Legal Counsel, for any/all of them… because of:
§ 288h. Defense of certain constitutional powers
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode02/usc_sec_02_00000288—h000-.html
and, also because of:
§ 288k. Attorney General relieved of responsibility
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode02/usc_sec_02_00000288—k000-.html
and, also because the AG’s direct conflict-of-interest is inherent in challenging Obama’s citizenship, see, e.g.:
Title 8, § 1501. Certificate of diplomatic or consular officer of United States as to loss of American nationality
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001501—-000-.html
Also under Title 2 of the United States Code, please take note of federal statutes concerning the FEC.

Title 2, § 437c. Federal Election Commission
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode02/usc_sec_02_00000437—c000-.html
(b) Administration, enforcement, and formulation of policy; exclusive jurisdiction of civil enforcement; Congressional authorities or functions with respect to elections for Federal office
(1) The Commission shall administer, seek to obtain compliance with, and formulate policy with respect to, this Act and chapter 95 and chapter 96 of title 26. The Commission shall have exclusive jurisdiction with respect to the civil enforcement of such provisions.
** whereas that same Chapter 95 of Title 26 referenced above includes/specifies:
** when referring to aspects of the Presidential Election Campaign Fund, including eligibilities
§ 9011. Judicial review
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00009011—-000-.html
** which gets most any INDIVIDUAL PERSON the right of STANDING to go after Obama, via paragraph:
(b) Suits to implement chapter
(1) The Commission, the national committee of any political party, and individuals eligible to vote for President are authorized to institute such actions, including actions for declaratory judgment or injunctive relief, as may be appropriate to implement or contrue [1] any provisions of this chapter.
** while back in Title 2, re: the FEC itself, there is ALSO express/specific judicial review available again to “any individual eligible to vote in any election for the office of President”…:
§ 437h. Judicial review
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode02/usc_sec_02_00000437—h000-.html
soooo, there is more than one way of obtaining *statutory standing* to sue Obama, et al… and there are others, too…
The creative legal mind can certainly leverage this statute against Obama, somehow, hint, hint:
Title 2, § 441h. Fraudulent misrepresentation of campaign authority
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode02/usc_sec_02_00000441—h000-.html
Continuing with remaining Title 2 potentials, believe it or not (and, it figures…), there is nothing very useful under here, as they obviously didn’t want themselves really held accountable in any meaningful manner, if they could avoid it, duh..:
Title 2, CHAPTER 24 — CONGRESSIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode02/usc_sup_01_2_10_24.html
SUBCHAPTER IV—ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL DISPUTE-RESOLUTION PROCEDURES
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode02/usc_sup_01_2_10_24_20_IV.html
so, skip all of that, except make a mental note that Congress has “unlawfully” shielded themselves from judicial accountability?
from United States Code, TITLE 3, The President:
§ 15. Counting electoral votes in Congress
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode03/usc_sec_03_00000015—-000-.html
like stated in Constitution, objections to electoral vote must be called for by the Speaker
likewise, either Biden, and/or Pelosi, God forbid, can be compelled under 28 USC 1361 to “qualify” Obama and themselves:
§ 19. Vacancy in offices of both President and Vice President; officers eligible to act
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode03/usc_sec_03_00000019—-000-.html
another statutory parallel to the Constitutional provisions
from United States Code, TITLE 5, Government Organization and Employees:
Even MORE legal authority to leverage/expose Obama through the FEC, via Title 5 of the United States Code, as to otherwise judicially compelling ALL OTHER duties of the FEC to be manifested into reality, including eligibilities
Title 5, CHAPTER 7 - JUDICIAL REVIEW in general
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sup_01_5_10_I_30_7.html
§ 701. Application; definitions
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00000701—-000-.html
i.e., the FEC is *not* listed as an excluded “agency” to judicial review
which includes rights of *individuals eligible to vote for President* to sue in federal court, i.e., STATUTORY STANDING
and, while the available scope of review for the federal court used is quite wide and grand, indeed, *constitutionally*:
§ 706. Scope of review
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00000706—-000-.html
Then, there’s also going through the angle of the federal Office of Personnel Management
§ 1103. Functions of the Director
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00001103—-000-.html
i.e., to judicially compel, by 28 USC 1361 federal officer duty mandate (see Title 28 below), the Director of OPM to “qualify” Obama as a bona fide qualified federal employee, i.e., as a bona fide U.S. Citizen, etc.
i.e., as in their statutory duty to ensure Obama’s “loyalty” to the USA…
§ 1304. Loyalty investigations
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00001304—-000-.html
Then, as to compelling the various Secretaries of State (in the various different sister States) to “ensure validity” of Obama’s qualifications and eligibility, those such Plaintiffs can maybe use:
§ 1502. Influencing elections; taking part in political campaigns; prohibitions; exceptions
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00001502—-000-.html
particulary paragraph (a)(1) and maybe also (a)(2) thereof
Heck, also under Title 5, you could use the compelling of the Merit Systems Protection Board, in the same way as compelling the Director of OPM above, pursuant to
§ 1505. Hearings; adjudications; notice of determinations
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00001505—-000-.html
and under paragraph (2) thereof, to have Obama removed from office
which would be agency whitewashed, of course, so then you have statutory right to judicial review, thereafter
Also under Title 5 of the United States Code are other commanding “loyalty” statutes, such as
§ 3333. Employee affidavit; loyalty and striking (think: “withholding Presidential records”) against the Government
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00003333—-000-.html
and by following through to the referenced statute therein:
§ 7311. Loyalty and striking
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00007311—-000-.html
“An individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he—
(1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;”
i.e., we find that Obama is *affirmatively* violating paragraph (1) above, every day, as long as he refuses or “fails to qualify” as Prez under the Constitutional manner dictated, refuses to “make public” his “Presidential records” as per law, etc…
from United States Code, TITLE 8, Aliens and Nationality:

regarding defining a U.S. “national” or U.S. “citizen”
***OLDER
in general:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sup_01_8_10_11.html
a couple of specifics worth tracing through the Library of Congress:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00000601—-000-.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00000801—-000-.html
***NEWER
in general:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sup_01_8_10_12_20_III.html
a few specifics usable thereunder are:
§ 1401. Nationals and citizens of United States at birth
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001401—-000-.html
§ 1408. Nationals but not citizens of the United States at birth
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001408—-000-.html
§ 1481. Loss of nationality by native-born or naturalized citizen
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001481—-000-.html
§ 1488. Nationality lost solely from performance of acts or fulfillment of conditions
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001488—-000-.html
You could/can compel the Sec of Homeland Security’s duties (again, under 28 USC 1361 mandate) to investigate Obama’s citizenship
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001103—-000-.html
(which also, again, shows the inherent conflict-of-interest with the AG representing/defending Obama’s citizenship issue)
AND/OR
you could/can compel the Sec of State (Hillary) to do the same thing, i.e., investigate Obama’s citizenship
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001104—-000-.html
which also, by the way, adds a nice touch of direct conflict-of-interests into the game :)
see also:
§ 1227. Deportable aliens
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001227—-000-.html
(multiple angles of attack v. Obama herein, see *especially* (a)(3)(D) thereunder)
(again, showing inherent conflict-of-interest in the AG defending Obama’s citizenship issues..)
Maybe a clever Plaintiff party could leverage this statute into deciding the eligibility issue from another angle:
§ 1501. Certificate of diplomatic or consular officer of United States as to loss of American nationality
see also:
§ 1642. Verification of eligibility for Federal public benefits
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001642—-000-.html
Obama’s various federal benefits, i.e., wages, medical, pension, etc., cannot be received by any “alien”
“proof of citizenship” required under (a)(2) thereunder, but admittedly maybe a stretch to implement…
also, add any federal benefits being received by Michelle Obama, and by his two daughters, even?…
see also:
§ 1644. Communication between State and local government agencies and Immigration and Naturalization Service
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001644—-000-.html
from United States Code, TITLE 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure:
Oh, on that many inherent conflicts-of-interest by the Atty Gen in representing Obama over citizenship issues?
So, after knowing the above statutes that specify when and when not, then see:
§ 528. Disqualification of officers and employees of the Department of Justice
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00000528—-000-.html
(throw the bum, “AG-elect” Eric Holder, OUT OF OFFICE!)
see also:
§ 530B. Ethical standards for attorneys for the Government
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00000530—B000-.html
see also:
§ 547. Duties (of all of the U.S. attorneys)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00000547—-000-.html
and, see also (kewl!):
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00000591—-000-.html
Referenced several times above, can be used against Obama, or ANY other federal official…
§ 1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00001361—-000-.html
And, don’t ever forget about the awesome power and flexibility of seeking any kind of WRIT:
§ 1651. Writs
from United States Code, TITLE 42, The Public Health and Welfare:

a little bit of creative thinking, or “connecting the dots”, can be leveraged with:
§ 1971. Voting rights
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00001971—-000-.html
then also, why not go after Obama’s OWN (Chicago/Illinois) vote being unlawful (as an illegal alien, false citizenship, etc.), via:
§ 1973i. Prohibited acts
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00001973—i000-.html
see especially paragraphs (c) and (d) thereunder, like CONCEALING MATERIAL RECORDS!!!
see also, and *think* while reviewing:
§ 1973gg–9. Civil enforcement and private right of action
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00001973–gg009-.html
(to ensure “statutory standing” due to the *private right of action*…)
and likewise regarding Obama’s continued concealment of records, but used under his OWN voting qualifications in Chicago, in both 2004 and 2008:
§ 1974a. Theft, destruction, concealment, mutilation, or alteration of records or papers; penalties
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00001974—a000-.html
and the procedure to implement (hint, use “ex rel State of Illinois”?)
§ 1974b. Demand for records or papers by Attorney General or representative; statement of basis and purpose
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00001974—b000-.html
and, so, of course, the jurisdictional hook:
§ 1974d. Jurisdiction to compel production of records or papers
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00001974—d000-.html
While, all sorts of different “teams” and “organizations” including Obama in them can be arranged/claimed/accused under
§ 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00001985—-000-.html
especially paragraph (3) thereunder..
AND which therefore gives another *original jurisdiction* to the federal court under:
Title 28, § 1343. Civil rights and elective franchise
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00001343—-000-.html
along with the obligatory Section 1983 civil rights claims, of course…
from United States Code, TITLE 44, Public Printing and Documents:
includes the mandates regarding all “Presidential Records” - see all info/ammo at very top.
from United States Code, TITLE 50, War and National Defense:
Can we spell all of the different names of the “radicals” associated with Obama, both prior and present, stir in a little Acorn soup, allege the basic, obvious facts on paper, and leverage this, even? The skilled legal practioner can surely do it:
TITLE 50 > CHAPTER 23 > SUBCHAPTER IV — COMMUNIST CONTROL
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode50/usc_sup_01_50_10_23_20_IV.html
And, just for good measure, everything you wanted to know about the new Presidential declaration of National Emergency regarding the swine flu, or H1N1 derivative, and including how and when to terminate any national emergency:

Heck, people, all of that is JUST from pouring through ONLY the entire United States Code (USC). What if someone took the time to sift through *the entire* Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), maybe research the available Secret Service documentation, manuals, and etc., or the same sets of endless rules and regulations from other relevant federal agencies/departments? What if Obama is breaking the law - again - every time he flies out of the country, and then “tries to re-enter” our Nation? Do you get the point? The age-old adage is that “no man is above the law”, and, yet, people think the cliche is true, that high government officers can merely *get away* with acting like they are “above the law” - yet, I tell you the simple truth: the higher a government official is in rank, the more and more rules, regulations, laws and other authorities that exist in relation to their position, and they have, effectively, even more and more “leashes” snaring them down.. watching their every move. Indeed, I would call Obama the man who is “most UNDER the law” in America, actually… every Presidential candidate must be *necessarily* prepared to accept that role for his or her entire term of office… to be the most-leashed public servant that there is… to be subject to intense scrutiny… and, via ‘on paper’, i.e., accountable to the greatest amount and numbers of variously written laws…
The point is, Patriots of the United States of America, that there are various EASY and COMMANDING ways, already in full force of law, with which to obtain the “eligibility” records sought, or to find no sufficient records exist, and bring an end to this utter nonsense of a circus, if only a **comprehensive** review of the matters be done and actually implemented.
REPEAT OF SUMMARY:
The law of the United States Code is extremely clear, even often in multiple times and multiple ways, that:
a) the AG *cannot* represent/defend Obama in any challenge that involves a question of his nationality/citizenship, for the relevant statutory laws mandate that the AG be on the *prosecuting* side against Obama, if the AG is involved at all…
b) the AG also *cannot* represent/defend Senators or the Senate body, itself, in these constitutional questions, either…
c) there are various statutory standings provided for even “mere” individual Citizens to sue Obama, Congress, etc.
d) Obama’s “Presidential records” are expressly PUBLIC by mandate of law (and, combined with using AG Holder & U.S. Attorneys, i.e., our *taxdollars*, in an expressly-unconstitutional manner, defending Obama in citizenship issues, then Obama gets to pay back every single red cent of that $1.7 million spent so far… plus interest and penalties).
e) additionally, there are all sorts of federal agencies/heads to go after Obama’s eligibility through, by statutes.
ADDITIONAL LEGAL THEORIES & ARGUMENTS:
Lastly, let me also point out and ardently remind of these important items to consider into the mix:
1) - Clinton was held in contempt by a federal court, while he was still the President, ergo, jurisdiction exists:
(See also, most especially, Nixon v. Fitzgerald, Jenness v. Fortson, Bush v. Gore, Kawakita v. U.S., U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, U.S. v. Rhodes, and Scheuer v. Rhodes [a different ”Rhodes” case, unrelated], all from SCOTUS)
2) - Congress, itself, routinely turns to the judiciary to resolve issues, even to sue the President:
3) - EVERY President is sued in order to compel official duties, all the dang time, by business, individuals, and even other government and quasi-government entities. Just one example out of literally thousands:
and go look at the online dockets and archived opinions of the various federal court types physically located in DC…
4) - Heck, it’s even “ok” to actually sue the White House Executives for scandalous allegations of outright fraud:
5) - You have to remember/realize the REASON *why* Obama goes around hiding/concealing records… because that is exactly what he has been taught from birth to do… His mother obviously embroiled herself into some sort of “bend rules” stuff over Barry’s birth, somehow, and necessarily with someone else.. and HAD to later tell her son at least *something* about his unusual citizenship situation, at some time in his life. Further, with all the moving around the world (her work and etc.), especially to and through countries that were NOT being friendly with the United States, he was also taught through childhood NOT to have too much respect for the United States, or its culture and society… That’s the kind of friends and others who Obama hung around with quite often during his formative childhood, teenage, and young adult years. Also, of course, all that passing through various nations in political turmoils might typically require travelers to forge and fake documents and statements, just to avoid delays and problems.. And, later, for Barry to take a new muslim/african name while living in the United States, in order to demonstrate to his similar-thinking friends his “independence” and “repugnance” of the “establishment” level of the same United States. And, momma was right there, the whole time while Obama grew up, “explaining” away the “shortcuts” that they needed to take, just to get around and survive sometimes… teaching him, by example, to do the same thing as “needed”… Probably helping little Barry fill out student loan paperwork, too, as he prepared to enter his first college or university, right?? Is Obama hiding something in his various records? Oh, that’s a given, easily. Nationality/citizenship is surely not the only thing being concealed. He very likely has taken all sorts of federal financial benefits, student and/or small business loans, congressional perks, and/or now presidential stuff, that he wouldn’t even otherwise be regularly qualified for, in the first place, let alone the impostor citizen status to complicate things even that much further. Sure, he is also a Constitutional scholar himself, also taught to remember that there was the opportunity of better weath and life in America, that country he was likely daily taught to otherwise despise, but he was surely taught, and taught often, to “bend the rules” on nationality/citizenship paperwork as needed… Want confirmation? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Dunham and there Obama’s quote about his mother, who was: “the dominant figure in my formative years… The values she taught me continue to be my touchstone when it comes to how I go about the world of politics.“ Oh, yeah, I am confident he is hiding more than just mere citizenship issues… And, by the way, from recent story developments, it could actually be that little Barry’s mother was NOT married to his father, at all. Could it actually be that, maybe, just maybe, Ms. Dunham was *also not* a bona fide citizen of the United States, either???
6) - Mr. Berg, Dr. Taitz, and Mr. Apuzzo, especially, but along with all other plaintiffs/counsel, would do well to consider the ramifications - and power - of the first two paragraphs, paragraph (a)(1) and paragraph (a)(2), here:
7) - Sooo, what?? You get Obama thrown out of office… NOW what? What THEN? WHO becomes the next President? The answer, again, is very simple: Per the original Constitution, Mr. John McCain IS the *temporary* President, and Mr. Ralph Nader IS the *temporary* Vice-President, while a proper Re-Election is done promptly, say within 120 to 180 days of new campaigning time period allowed from date of judicial ruling, using ***distinct*** voting/balloting for the offices of President and Vice-President, and *only* those all same 2008 Prez and VP candidates run again, if they so choose to do again, but the mandatory result of the true Constitutional law and design is that you almost certainly end up with one (1) White House Executive from EACH/BOTH of the top two political parties, i.e., most likely either McCain as Prez with Hillary as Vice-Prez, or the reverse, Hillary as Prez with McCain as Vice-Prez, because of simple mathematics and the Constitutional selection process involved, i.e., the top two political strengths/parties each get one of the top two Executive positions, President and Vice-President. That’s pre-12th Amendment, like it *should be* still done. But, even after the 12th Amendment (1804-1805, enacted-ratified), the campaign law hasn’t been followed correctly since the 1870s, and the “newer” opportunity of “running for” Vice-President is **supposed** to be ran for independently from the balloting/voting process of the candidates for President. So, in the current state of things, the Re-Election of 2008, done under present (don’t strike down the) 12th Amendment rule, we must end up with ONE of the Presidential candidates, and ONE of the Vice-Presidential candidates, but NOT necessarily, and NOT even probably or likely, being of the *same* party. In other words, under the current law in place for 200+ years, and that was suddenly ceased to be followed during the 1870s, we should have had 2008 results like: Obama/Palin, Hillary/Palin, McCain/Biden, Baldwin/Palin, Nader/Biden, or etc. - any Prez candidate that wins Prez + any Vice-Prez candidate that wins the SEPARATELY DONE race for the Vice-Presidency… Or, again, what’s even easier.. simply go back to pre-12th Amendment, like it should best be done anyway (strike the 12th Amend. down), and you have no race for VP, at all, itself, but the two top Prez candidates become 1st (Prez) and 2nd (Vice-Prez) in number of votes obtained. Simple. Balanced. Elegant. It’s *supposed* to always be a Joint Administration (politically) in the White House, anyway. And, that law and design and intent always was followed, too, until the 1870s… when the new mega-wealth “barons” and “tycoons” entered onto the American scene through vast new enterprises in railroads, steel, telegraphs, newspapers, etc., and began to *really* take over, in bending and stretching the political process to suit their own desires. Those damn Banksters… greed, the oldest sin of all..
But then, the Word of God - twice - clearly reminds the inescapable truth:
“You cannot serve both God and Mammon.”
And, it also clearly reminds: “My people perish for lack of knowledge.”
Points proven for God’s Word, as always being solid truth and wisdom, once again
CALL TO ACTION:
Especially to Mr. Apuzzo and Dr. Taitz, in respective timeline order: Regardless of filing appeal to your Circuit, you should certainly — certainly (is everybody watching them??) — incorporate some of the above, and file your immediate motions for reconsideration, based on newly discovered authority, etc. Mr. Apuzzo has until this coming Wednesday, November 4th to file any motion for alteration of judgment (Dismissal entered 10/21/09, ten (10) “business” days, per FRCP Rule 6(a)(2)), to file motion under FRCP Rule 59), while Dr. Taitz has the same ten business days allotted since Judge Carter’s ruling was entered, and she can also slap that traitor Judge Land back with a Rule 60(b) motion, because - omg!! - even *thinking* about any *sanctions* during a *political question* case violates everything known to man… hint, hint… let alone the fact that Judge Land was outLANDish and wrong, in the first place. The above statutes under U.S. Code prove it.
To all “Obama eligibility” Plaintiffs/Counsel: Please now implement the above clear mandates of federal statutory law, and thereby take away all further notions of “discretion”, “doctrine”, or any other interference or delay. Command your victory. There is absolutely NO legally plausible **excuse** for Obama violating his statutory duties to make his “Presidential records” made ALL and immediately public domain. Period. End of story. Sooo, bye-bye, Mr. Obama, ‘et al.’
To all “NObama” - “End The Fed” - “Go Sarah” - “Hillary” - and other supporters: Please forward out widely to all available forums/groups/etc., at least the basic “hammers” above, especially the legal mandate of Obama’s “Presidential records” being made full public items for inspection/review. It is actually YOUR tireless communications/distribution work that actually gets the hooks baited, fish caught, cleaned, cooked and eaten tonight for supper. Thank you.
Yeah, that’s right. I have chosen to live near poverty for years now, fighting part-time or more for restoration of America.
If you like my help, I could sure use donations, left side PayPal on http://unitedcivilrights.org, to upgrade to full-time restoration work. That would help a whole lot to get this all done, and America back on a good Constitutional course.
That way, instead of having to spend large chunks of my time working on people’s individual due process and other cases out there, I could focus on nothing but restoring America’s Constitutional Heritage through various legal HAMMERS actually implemented, sooner………………………….
Thanks!
Sincerest Regards,
——————————————
Mr. Torm Howse
Co-Founder, National Board Director, Instructor,
United Civil Rights Councils of America
http://unitedcivilrights.org
Co-Founder, National Board Director, Trustee,
Parental Alienation Awareness Organization - US
http://paao-us.com
Founder, Owner, President,
The FIDO Network
http://fidonetwork.com
General Contact:
P.O. Box 68665
Indianapolis, Indiana 46268
(317) 286-2538 office (888) 738-4643 fax
indianacrc@earthlink.net
Increase Your FAITH!