ARPAIO WILL CONTINUE INVESTIGATION OF OBAMA’S IDENTITY
by Penbrook One

STAYING ON POINT: Despite Barack Obama’s antagonism of a racially divisive political environment, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio says he will continue his Cold Case investigation of evidence that shows the digital image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” and Selective Service registration card are fraudulent records.

By Dan Crosby
Of The Daily Pen

NEW YORK, NY – Unless the recent announcement that the U.S. Department of Justice will not pursue charges against the Maricopa County Sheriff’s office is also accompanied with a confession by the unknown criminals who counterfeited and posted to the official White House website a faked computer image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth”, Arizona lawman, Joe Arpaio, says he will continue his cold case investigation of the fraudulent identity records.
Arpaio spoke with WND’s Aaron Klein during a WABC broadcast of Klein’s “Investigative Radio” about Obama-appointed Attorney General Eric Holder’s recent decision to close what appears to have been a politically motivated probe into so-called misconduct by personnel of the MCSO.
Although the unfounded allegations against Arpaio’s office began after the introduction of Arizona’s SB1070 immigration enforcement law, Obama's DOJ vigorously pursued the probe of Arpaio in the past year in what appeared to be a politically motivated retaliation for Arpaio’s highly publicized investigation of Obama’s fraudulent birth certificate and Selective Service registration card.
“My office has been vindicated,” Arpaio told Klein.
Arpaio continued by saying the investigation of his office has been ridiculous.
“We’re glad it’s over,” he said, “…It’s been in the media constantly for four years. I guess it’s because it’s me. If it was somebody else, you probably wouldn’t hear about it.”
Klein then asked the sheriff, “Leading up to the November election, do you plan to continue your investigation and make the eligibility issue and Obama’s birth certificate into a campaign issue?”
“We’re continuing it,” Arpaio responded.
“It’s not whether he was born here. We’re looking at the fraudulent government documents. That’s been my mission from day one…to see if those birth certificates were false.
Since before the 2008 election, many have suspected that information about Obama’s past and his true identity have been intentionally obscured and counterfeited to prevent the American public from discovering what many believe is politically, if not legally, destructive evidence against Obama's legitimacy to serve as president.
For many, the lack of verifiable information about Obama’s true identity disqualifies him, by default, from being a legitimate president. However, if authentic documents were discovered containing information about Obama's alleged birthplace and parentage of his birth; His citizenship status as a resident in Indonesia; His unverified identity records, including a suspicious social security number issued from Connecticut, a state he never resided in, and a foreign passport used to travel to Pakistan, they would have a cataclysmic impact on Obama’s legitimacy as president if any of them either a.) revealed he was not born in the U.S. to two citizen parents or, b.) proves that he did not maintain his citizenship from birth to election or, c.) shows he has been lying about his real identity.
“We haven’t given up on it,” Arpaio continued. “We have a lot of information. We’ll see what happens.”
When Klein asked the sheriff if he thought the birth certificate would be a significant issue in the election, Arpaio said he believes the issue will, unfortunately, continue to be ignored by the political parties and the mainstream media.
“I don’t think so,” Arpaio responded, “…because everybody’s ignoring it on both sides of the fence. Even the media ignores the evidence we have. But we did our job, I was asked to do it, we used my volunteer posse at no cost to the government. We did a great investigation; we’re still coming up with information, so we’ll see what happens on that issue.”
The DOJ opened the investigation of Arpaio in 2010 after it received allegations from left-wing groups of financial improprieties by the sheriff and his deputies.
The DOJ found no such evidence of impropriety.
A separate federal investigation into Arpaio’s office regarding alleged civil rights abuses is still ongoing, but also appears to be based on personal politics rather than any legal precedent. After the Supreme Court ruled in favor of part of Arizona’s SB 1070 immigration enforcement law, allowing police to request immigration status from those suspected of being in the U.S. illegally, radical leftists retaliated by prompting the Obama administration to initiate a civil rights investigation against Arpaio.
It has long been known that radicals, like those infesting the Obama administration, rail against laws prohibiting illegal immigrants from voting because illegal immigrants tend to vote, by a wide margin, for the democrat party. Obama’s recent Executive Order granting amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens is just one example of padding the liberal voting bloc by circumventing immigration laws.
Therefore, Obama and his party of radicals only seek to ingratiate themselves with political power by disregarding the U.S. Constitution and harassing long-serving immigration law enforcement officials, like Arpaio.

WE HAVE THE EVIDENCE to get Obama out of office on this one Felony alone: Social Security Identity Theft - which is a Federal Felony Crime alone. WE THE PEOPLE must have 365/24/7 Marches showing the entire world that Barack Hussein Obama II is using a Stolen Social Security I.D. Card Number: 042-68-4225 - inside of our White House that belongs to a deceased person who was born in 1890 and who died in 1977 who lived in Conneticut. AMERICANS THIS IS BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA’S SMOKING GUN THAT WILL GET OBAMA ARRESTED VERY SOON: Barack Obama is committing Social Security Theft/Fraud, Federal Identity Theft, Federal Forgies, Federal Frauds, Federal Grand Theft, RICCO crimes, and many federal felonies associated with this.

Barack Hussein Obama II/Barry Soetoro is today currently using this Stolen Social Security Number: 042-68-4225 as Obama sits illegally in Our White House. The current Social Security number Obama is using today: 042-68-4225 legally belongs to a person who was born in 1890, and who died at the age of 119 yrs in 1977 in Westbury, Conneticut. Editors Note: this is an obvious error...the person who died would have been about 87 years of age and would be about 119 if he were alive today, as Obama is pretending by using that SSN. Also, Obama/ Soetoro has never lived in CT.

OBAMA is using this stolen Social Security Number because OBAMA IS TRULY AN ILLEGAL ALIEN, and Obama can’t obtain a legal Social Security Number assigned to him because Obama never naturalized into the USA from Indonesia, or from Kenya as Barack Obama was truly born in Kenya. Editors note: we don't really know why he is using this SSN.

Usurper Obarack Hussein Obama also is a Serial Criminal, and American citizens don’t have to have “standing” to have Obama arrested for Social Security Theft, I.D. Theft, & Forgeries & Frauds Obama has committed & is committing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ap-9VwlwfoE

Orly TAITZ files 18 U.S.C. §1346: Intangible Rights Fraud—

from The Betrayal by David-Crockett

Miscellaneous Filings (Other Documents)

8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Captain Pamela Barnett, et al v. Barack Hussein Obama, et al

(ANx), DISCOVERY, MANADR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly on 10/11/2009 at 12:57 PM PDT and filed on 10/11/2009

Case Name:	Captain Pamela Barnett, et al v. Barack Hussein Obama, et al
Case Number:	8:09-cv-82
Filer:	Cynthia Davis
	Timothy Jones
	Alan Keyes PhD
	Pamela Barnett
	Richard Norton Bauerbach
	Robin D Biron
	John D Blair
	David L Bosley
	Loretta G Bosley
	Harry G Butler
	Glenn Casada
	Jennifer Leah Clark
	Timothy Comerford
	Charles Crusemire
	Thomas S Davidson
	Matthew Michael Edwards
	Jason Freese
	Kurt C Fuqua
	Clint Grimes
	Julliett Ireland
	D Andrew Johnson
	Israel D Jones
	David Fullmer LaRoque
	Gail Lightfoot
	Lita M Lott
	David Grant Mosby
	Steven Kay Neuenschwander
	Frank Niceley
	Jerry ONeil
	Robert Lee Perry
	Harry Riley
	Jeffrey Wayne Rosner
	Jeffrey Schwilk
	David Smithey
	John Bruce Steidel
	Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth
	Eric Swafford
	Neil B Turner
	Richard E Venable
	Jeff Graham Winthrope
	Mark Wriggle
Document Number:	84

Docket Text:
Request for judicial notice filed by Plaintiffs Clint Grimes, Julliett Ireland, D Andrew Johnson, Israel D Jones, Timothy Jones, David Fullmer LaRoque, Gail Lightfoot, Lita M Lott, David Grant Mosby, Steven Kay Neuenschwander, Frank Niceley, Jerry ONeil, Robert Lee Perry, Harry Riley, Jeffrey Wayne Rosner, Jeffrey Schwilk, David Smithey, John Bruce Steidel, Douglas Earl Stoeppelwerth, Eric Swafford, Neil B Turner, Richard E Venable, Jeff Graham Winthrope, Mark Wriggle, Alan Keyes PhD, Pamela Barnett, Richard Norton Bauerbach, Robin D Biron, John D Blair, David L Bosley, Loretta G Bosley, Harry G Butler, Glenn Casada, Jennifer Leah Clark, Timothy Comerford, Charles Crusemire, Cynthia Davis, Thomas S Davidson, Matthew Michael Edwards, Jason Freese, Kurt C Fuqua (Attachments: # (1) Affidavit Expanded affidavit by Susan Daniels)(Taitz, Orly)
8:09-cv-82 Notice has been electronically mailed to:

David A DeJute USACAC.Civil@usdoj.gov, David.Dejute@usdoj.gov

Gary G Kreep usjf@usjf.net, elliotwilson@gmail.com

Orly Taitz dr_taitz@yahoo.com

Roger E West USACAC.Civil@usdoj.gov, Roger.West4@usdoj.gov

8:09-cv-8 2 Notice has been delivered by First Class U. S. Mail or by fax to: :

The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:

Main Document
Original filename:C:\fakepath\Keyes request for judicial notice of title 18 -1346.pdf
Electronic document Stamp:
[STAMP cacdStamp_ID=1020290914 [Date=10/11/2009] [FileNumber=8584558-0
] [a7cbe4da84e9becb71cb0e1d46498646ab7fdd33961c22311437e9abe9b62246601
bf6b6fe6c899abbaa42216054772bc2b4f280e35e6b10d8a1913bd56baf87]]
Document description:Affidavit Expanded affidavit by Susan Daniels
Original filename:C:\fakepath\Affidavit Susan Daniels.pdf
Electronic document Stamp:
[STAMP cacdStamp_ID=1020290914 [Date=10/11/2009] [FileNumber=8584558-1
] [3b18478039729bbe3e55246acf2ab178a981b4f4dc1091bfb218aa561ef704d5b79
96960a7520976245d23b5a28f4ee38b8f6dc36e29e2776dedfe69c5e8644e]]

Document description:

Dr. Orly Taitz, Attorney-at-Law

29839 Santa Margarita Parkway

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7036

California State Bar No.: 223433

E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Captain Pamela Barnett, et al., §

Plaintiffs, §

§

v. § Civil Action:

§

Barack Hussein Obama, § SACV09-00082-DOC-AN

Michelle L.R. Obama, §

Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, § 18 U.S.C. §1346: Intangible

Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, § Rights Fraud-Request for Judicial

Joseph R. Biden, Vice-President and § Notice that Individual Damages

President of the Senate, § Not Required in Public Sector

Defendants. § Mail & Wire Political Corruption

18 U.S.C. §1346: Intangible Rights Fraud—

Request for Judicial Notice that Individual Damages

Are not Required in Public Sector Mail & Wire Political Corruption

Come now the Plaintiffs with this Request for Judicial Notice that Individual Damages are not required in public sector mail & wire fraud relating to political corruption under 18 U.S.C. §1346, together with notice of filing expanded report by Susan Daniels.

During this Court’s hearing on October 5, 2009, the Court searchingly examined counsel for the Plaintiffs and Defendants regarding the sole threshold question of “standing.” Plaintiffs’ provided arguments of Flast v. Cohen taxpayer standing or else 9^th Amendment reserved rights to Petition for Redress of Grievances concerning a clear violation of the Constitution’s clearly demarcated qualifications for the Presidency, as well as Oath taker standing per Allen v Board of Education and USA v Clark . l

Plaintiffs have, in the course of their investigations during the past year, accumulated a substantial amount of evidence concerning the Mr. Obama’s fraudulent manipulation of his own identity, and the legal identity of others. To this end Plaintiffs have previously submitted the Affidavit and Independent Investigative Report of Former Scotland Yard Inspector Neal Sankey and now submit the expanded Report of Ohio Private Investigator Susan Daniels.

These two private investigation reports, although slightly duplicative, show beyond reasonable doubt a pattern of manipulation of Barack Hussein Obama’s identity, employment, and residence information. The use of a multitude of social security numbers alone is indicative that Mr. Obama appears to have committed a substantial number of felony violations, including but not limited to violations of 42 U.S.C. §408(a)(7)(B). which shows dishonest political advantage during 2008 election. Plaintiffs submit again that “the American People Reserve the Right to know”. Furthermore, the examination and decipherment of the trail of deception so casually left by this successful candidate will (1) lead ultimately to discovery of the truth about his origins and citizenship, (2) reveal the nature of the scheme to defraud by which this Mr. Barack Hussein Obama became President, and (3) show the degree and nature of the collusion of other people and parties in the scheme of defraud leading to his election, including but not limited to the other Defendants.

The Plaintiffs have repeatedly alleged that the election of 2008 was procured by fraud. Acquisition of high public office by and through implementation of a scheme to defraud regarding material facts regarding a candidate’s qualifications and identity is a species of public sector fraud. Such a scheme to defraud is actionable by private parties under 18 U.S.C. §1346, in that each instance of the use of interstate wires or mail delivery facilities counts as an individual predicate act under Civil R.I.C.O., 18 U.S.C. §§1961, 1962(a)-(d), and 1964(c).

Plaintiffs request the Court to take note that the United States Congress’ express purpose in enacting 18 U.S.C. §1346 was to ensure that corruption by both (even paired) public and private sector defendants (such as Defendants Barack and Michelle Obama were from the Illinois Senatorial Election 2004-up-through January 20, 2009 individualized damages were not required to obtain convictions under 18 U.S.C. §1346. It logically follows that Civil RICO actions relating to public and private sector corruption which would utilize predicate acts of criminal violations of 18 U.S.C. §1346 could likewise be brought without proof of individualized damages or “standing” in the civil sense. Plaintiffs accordingly submit that the principles of prosecutions of public corruption based on 18 U.S.C. §1346 be applied to evaluate the standing of the Plaintiffs in the present above-entitled-and-numbered case Barnett v. Obama.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request that this Honorable Court take Judicial Notice of the doctrine of the people’s intangible right to honest services based on 18 U.S.C. §1346, and consider the significance for the standing of the people to bring suit under Civil RICO (18 U.S.C. §1964(c)), that the criminal predicate acts for RICO which may be substantiated under this title do not require specific personalized injury to business or property interests. Accordingly, the people of the United States may sue for Civil RICO for the fraudulent denial of their intangible right to honest services without showing individualized specific injury, and this case should be allowed to go forward, albeit with Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint allowed to be filed, and considered as a fundamental (complementary) element of citizen standing.

Respectfully submitted,

Sunday, October 11, 2009

/s/ ORLY TAITZ, ESQ.

By:__________________________________

Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. (California Bar 223433)

Attorney for the Plaintiffs

29839 Santa Margarita Parkway

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

Tel.: 949-683-5411; Fax: 949-766-7036

E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com

PROOF OF SERVICE

I the undersigned Charles Edward Lincoln, being over the age of 18 and not a party to this case, so hereby declare under penalty of perjury that on this, Sunday, October 11, 2009, I provided electronic copies of the Plaintiffs’ above-and-foregoing Request for Judicial Notice of Scheme to Defraud by Denial of the Intangible Right to Honest Services under 18 U.S.C. §1346 was served on all of the following non-party attorneys whose names were affixed to the “STATEMENT OF INTEREST” who have appeared in this case in accordance with the local rules of the Central District of California, to wit:

THOMAS P. O’BRIEN

LEON W. WEIDMAN

ROGER E. WEST roger.west4@usdoj.gov (designated as lead counsel for President Barack Hussein Obama on August 7, 2009)

DAVID A. DeJUTE David.Dejute@usdoj.gov

GARY KREEP usjf@usjf.net

FACSIMILE (213) 894-7819

DONE AND EXECUTED ON THIS Sunday the 11^th day of October, 2009.

/s/Charles Edward Lincoln, III

Charles Edward Lincoln, III

Tierra Limpia/Deo Vindice

c/o Peyton Yates Freiman

603 Elmwood Place, Suite #6

Austin, Texas 78705

charles.lincoln@rocketmail.com

Tel: (512) 923-1889