Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth Issued by Hawaiian Health Agency, Not Hospital
by Penbrook One
Despite propaganda generated to convince American voters that Obama is a natural-born citizen, the recently released document lauded by handlers and information manipulators remains unvettable due to its municipal origins, vanquished by the absence of an original 1961, Hospital generated “Certificate of Live Birth” which all Natural born presidential candidates would possess…all except one.
by Dan Crosby
of The Daily Pen
It is hard to imagine the American media could be this stupid.
Four years have passed since Barack Obama announced his candidacy for the Presidency and during that time he has never provided an original, 1961, hospital generated, standard version of a NVSD “Certificate of Live Birth” containing the signature of the Deputy Registrar of the State of Hawaii (not a local Registrar), and the name of an attending birthing physician with accompanying information about medical metrics of the birth.
However, Obama sure seems to rely on that little municipal agency way out there in the Pacific Ocean to provide whatever document, containing whatever label they decide to put on it that day, to perpetuate his epic deception.
Despite questions about its authenticity, the recent document issued by the Obama regime is a well dressed copy of a form of birth documentation created, once again, by the Hawaiian Department of Health, not a hospital, which is the same record commonly triggered by Hawaiian vital records laws upon the registration of births in that state, regardless of the location of the birth.
Officially, births can be registered in the state of Hawaii regardless if they actually occurred there when a doctor is able verify and sign an administratively originated "Certificate of Live Birth" from the Department of Health. The doctor does not have to be the actual birthing doctor.
Official 1961 Certificate of Live Birth template created by the National Vital Statistics Division of the U.S. Department of Health. This form is declared by the Vital Statistics Report to be the "Standard Certificate" to be used by Hospitals in the United States. Notice the lower section pop-out which explicitly says "This section must be filled out". This section is used by hospitals to record the weight of the baby at birth, the duration of the pregnancy and if the birth is legitimate (occurring to married parents). It is also used by the local vital records office to record changes in the childs vital record status such as being adopted or a name change after birth. This section is not present on Obama's alleged long form Certificate of Live Birth because it was not issued by a hospital at the time of his birth. It was issued through an administrative process after a doctor examined him as a baby in the hospital named on the document.
Because of its historic indigenous population, "walk-in" registrations and permeable migratory culture, when a doctor examined the child in the 1960s and affirmed parentage and identity, that doctor became the attending physician of record in Hawaii, regardless if he or she was actually the birthing doctor. According to HRS 338 and 571, the term "attending physician" does not only mean one who attends the birth in Hawaii, it also applies to one with medical qualifications who examines and attests to the health of the child after birth.
According the Hawaii Revised Statute 338, the Department of Health was obligated to provide this very document to any applicant upon receiving evidence from the applicant that proved the birth parents to be residence of the state of Hawaii. HRS 338 also contains legal mandates which force the Director of Health in the state to issue “original birth certificates” to applicants under similar circumstances when the “adult or minor” applicant states that they do not have an original birth record from any other agency…regardless of the location of the birth.
A hospital has no such laws governing the way it issues a Certificate of Live Birth. This form of original birth certificate is issued under one condition. The baby being born in that hospital at the time and place indicated on the document.
The document image released on April 27th omits information from the lower region of the form which is available on a standard version of the 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” describing amendments to the document, updates and birth metrics such as weight and length. This region is commonly used by the hospital identify any medical information pertaining to the parents as well as complications which may have arisen from the delivery. If the hospital does not use this section of the form for medical information, the state Department of Health will use it to record amendments, such as adoptions, name changes, parental identification and other notations related to the identity or status of the child.
However, the recent push to focus on the canards about Obama’s place of birth as stated in this wanton document image is yet another diversion from his failure to secure evidence proving he is eligible to hold the office of the presidency. While the liberal media desires to focus on Obama’s failures as a president, the American people continue to ask the most important preeminent question of all. Is Obama even eligible to be president in the first place? Perhaps the President would have never been a failure if it had never been Obama to begin with. That’s a lot to consider for the corrupted minds of the liberal establishment.
The most important document in this desolate saga is the 250-year-old blood-ransomed U.S. Constitution and, thus, the foundational doctrine of America’s vintage heritage, not some unverifiable, manufactured document from some stupid municipality way out in the ocean.
Vintage Americans should now understand by now, no matter what document Obama releases about his natal identity claiming to support his legitimacy as President, there are only two possible results which can ever occur. The document will either damage him politically or it will confirm that he is not eligible to be president.
First, Obama’s birthplace is irrelevant. His alleged father, as stated on the recently released “Certificate of Live Birth” registration, was never a U.S. citizen. Obama could have been born on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial and he would still not be eligible to be President.
On the other hand, if it turns out that Obama’s original parentage at conception is different than he has claimed it to be for the last three years, and the original document shows the previously un-amended version of his original “Certificate of Live Birth” confirming this, then he will be politically destroyed by his opponents for lying about his identity, rendering him un-electable.
However, let’s go ahead and discuss the “Certificate of Live Birth” document image posted on April 27th, 2011 to the internet, and confirmed as a long-form birth certificate by Obama himself.
It should be understood by all Americans that, regardless of its authenticity, the form document containing the recently released “Certificate of Live Birth” image, claimed by Obama to prove he was born in a Hawaiian hospital, was not provided by the originating source of his attested birthing witnesses from any hospital. Instead, the information and form of this particular publication were generated by the same agency which previously created the fraudulent, independently published Hawaiian “Certification of Live Birth” in 2008.
Recall in 2009, the mother of twins, Susan and Grethen Nordyke, requested and received two photostatic black copies of their original, August 5th 1961 “Certificates of Live Birth” which were produced and filed by personnel of Kapi’olani Hospital in Hawaii allegedly one day after Obama was born in that same facility. These copies contained five signatures, including the identities of four witnesses to the birth.
The Nordykes' births were then registered by the Department of Health in Honolulu and assigned numbers based on the geographic location of the regional branch of the Health department office the births were registered in. Birth registrations numbers are not issued based on chronological order. They are issued based on the order they are received from the local offices around the state of birth.
Yet, the fact that Obama would audaciously present yet another document created by the very same abetting agency which has notoriously concealed, corrupted and maligned every previous piece of information about Obama’s natal biography is, in a word…punishable.
Despite evidence strongly suggesting that the information provided in the recent image of a “Certificate of Live Birth” has been manipulated and, perhaps, forged, it is the fact that it even comes from the Hawaiian Department of Health is, in itself, the only reason needed to completely reject it as a counterfeit in its capacity to confirm Obama’s eligibility to be president.
Simply on its face, even if the document were assumed to be an authentic representation of Obama’s original, 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth”, the information contained within it was transcribed to the document image by the Department of Health, not the hospital named within it.
Unfortunately for Obama, the administrative procedures and Hawaiian vital records laws allows that state’s Health agency to create original birth certificates for births which do not occur in that state when the newborn child is examined post-delivery by a licensed Hawaiian physician and determined to be a child of parents who claimed Hawaii as their legal residence within a year of the birth, regardless of the location of the birth. The laws also allow the Hawaiian Health Department to name the hospital or facility where the examination takes place as the actual birthing location.
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Did the U.S. Military Act on its Own Authority to Kill bin Laden?
MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND “INSIDER” REPORT DIFFER
by Sharon Rondeau
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.
Osama bin Laden claimed responsibility for the attacks on the U.S. on September 11, 2001
(May 3, 2011) — A report which is quickly gaining traction on the web suggests that Obama did not want to take out Osama bin Laden but was overridden by senior military commanders who ordered Navy Seals to carry out the successful operation.
Several reports lead back to Ulsterman, a writer claiming to have direct contact with a White House insider who has been revealing the machinations of the Obama regime and discord among senior executive branch officials. Ulsterman’s report of May 2, 2011 indicated that Obama and his adviser, Valerie Jarrett, did not want the military to kill Osama bin Laden and that Obama did not issue the order to do so.
Before Obama revealed an image purported to be a certified copy of his original birth certificate from Hawaii on April 27, Ulsterman had covered the eligibility question and other issues such as Obama’s Marxist background. Media sources concede that those who doubted Obama’s eligibility might still not be convinced because of questions surrounding his possible Indonesian citizenship and the need for authentication of the image released last Wednesday.
Mainstream editorials masquerading as news reports say that Obama “had ordered a successful mission to kill Osama bin Laden” that “was a political coup that will yield him benefits for months, perhaps years, to come.” They state that Obama gave the order which resulted in bin Laden’s death. A third report stated that “According to administration officials, the president took an increasingly hands-on role during the past two months – chairing nearly a half dozen national security meetings – as U.S. forces inched closer to launching the mission. Obama said that he authorized the operation last week, and gave the final orders Sunday.”
One report states that Obama was golfing but cut short his usual 18-hole session to return to the White House for a final meeting. Was he summoned by senior military members, or did he head the meeting? Why did he walk into the Oval Office in golf shoes?
The military members who killed bin Laden are reportedly “an elite special forces group unofficially called Seal Team 6.”
Blogger Nobarack has published a long-form birth certificate from Hawaii which contains a section at the bottom not found in Obama’s release.
The official statement issued by the White House said that “in the earliest days of the administration, the President formally instructed the intelligence community and his counterterrorism advisors to make the pursuit of Osama bin Laden, as the leader of al Qaeda, as a top priority.”
The leader of Hamas condemned bin Laden’s assassination, labeling bin Laden “a Holy Warrior.”
If the military acted on its own, without an order from Obama, what, if anything, does that mean in regard to Obama’s continued presence in the White House?
Does the military regard Obama as legitimate? Obama refused to answer Lt. Col. Terry Lakin’s questions and military officers sent Lakin to Ft. Leavenworth rather than allow him discovery. Last week, Obama released an image of an alleged birth certificate, the authenticity of which was questioned immediately.
The Post & Email contacted LCDR Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III regarding the recent Ulsterman story.
Does Obama resemble the leader of the free world or a childish narcissist whose golf game was interrupted by top military advisors? Photo courtesy of blogger Ulsterman.
LCDR FITZPATRICK: I read the report, and it is completely consistent with what I would expect to have happen.
MRS. RONDEAU: It is?
LCDR FITZPATRICK: Yes, and the significance of this is enormous. You might not remember this, but I do, about the Somali pirates that took the Maersk Alabama. They boarded the ship and took hostages, and they got into the lifeboat. Then the U.S.S. Bainbridge came onto the scene, a U.S. Navy ship, and eventually a couple of Navy Seals picked these clowns off in the lifeboat. The Somali pirates were shot dead after having kidnapped the captain of the ship.
The pirates reported themselves as being from Somalia, and they went out and captured the merchantman named Maersk Alabama. It ended up that they were in the lifeboat. The crew of the Alabama fought back, and these guys got away with the captain of the ship. The Navy came onto the scene, and the ship had Navy Seals on board. There were Navy Seals who took the shots and killed the men in the lifeboat who had held the captain captive.
Obama hadn’t wanted those guys shot; he didn’t want the Seals to take the shot. But they did, and Obama was furious.
Then soon after that, there were three Navy Seals who were brought up on charges from a separate incident. They were going to court-martial these guys. I had it all over The Jaghunter that they were going to court-martial them. They backed away from it, but Obama had the Seals and himself at cross-purposes, and they have been for a long time.
Then you get this information last night, and it’s consistent. If the Seals had an opportunity to go after bin Laden and they were told not to from the White House, and they said, “No, we’re going in anyway,” that’s a very big deal. I do not believe that the Seals would have their name tied to this unless they were really the unit that took out Osama bin Laden. You don’t just cavalierly assign or name the Seals in an operation like that. I believe they were involved, and the person whose name I gave you is directly tied into this warfare community in a way that I’m not and would be able to tell you more about what he is hearing. But it came in last night; I’m looking at it…I’ve told you before that there are people in the military and there are people in every other federal organization that we’ve talked about who know that Mr. Obama is an outlaw. There are people in the military who are really ticked-off about that, and this is completely in keeping with the kind of attitude that is invested in military men and women who believe that Obama is an unconstitutional commander-in-chief and, at the same time, have had enough of this political game. They had a chance to take out Osama bin Laden, and they’re not going to take any nonsense from the White House; they’re just going to go in and do it.
Now as this story unfolds, and it will, that notion is going to build and build and build. It will be interesting to see who the personalities are who are involved in this.
I believe that Mr. Obama is in descent. I believe that he is on his way out the door. Another aspect to this which is consistent with what I think is going on is that I believe that people in the military know that he’s not going to last very much longer and that he’s not the commander-in-chief. He’s a fake. If they had a shot to take Osama bin Laden and they went to the White House to get permission to do that and the answer came back, “No,” then it was “Excuse me, but you aren’t the head of the ship anymore.”
I put it up at The Jaghunter, and I haven’t had this kind of traffic for a long, long time. It’s going viral. The story has been picked up by a lot of people. It’s making the rounds.
Mr. Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya. He’s not lawfully holding office in the White House, and there are military people who know that and they do not recognize his authority. They also recognize that Mr. Obama is committing acts of treason against this country, and what you saw within the last week was, “We’ve had enough of you and your decisions and the people who are in the White House.” In other words, the military knows enough, and the Seals community would be just that group of people. They don’t take prisoners; these guys mean what they say and say what they mean. From what I understand, there was increased intelligence coming out of interrogations at Guantanamo Bay; that’s run by the Navy. And you know there are Seals down at Gitmo.
So this makes complete sense to me. This is the United States Armed Forces standing up to Mr. Obama and saying to him, “You’re not my commander-in-chief.”
MRS. RONDEAU: I had to read your story twice. After the second time, I realized there was a larger ramification if the military acted on its own to take out bin Laden.
LCDR FITZPATRICK: These are people in the military who are standing up and saying, “You’re not my commander-in-chief.” They’re ticked off about Terry Lakin being locked up; they’re ticked off about how our government has been running; they’re ticked off about all of the things that you and I are ticked off about. And this is one segment of the military that doesn’t take nonsense from anyone. If I felt bad about anything that was in the narrative, I wouldn’t have published it, but I read it and had it up instantly. It laid it all out, and this is the way that the military works.
MRS. RONDEAU: Would you say that you have expected this as things have been building up?
LCDR FITZPATRICK: I expected something as a flashback. I expected that at some point, somewhere, someone in the military was going to stand up and say, “Mr. Obama, you can go to Hades. We’ve had enough.” And this opportunity was just too big a deal to follow his orders. Because they went to the White House to get permission and didn’t receive it – it wasn’t that they expected to receive it; they knew what the answer was going to be, and they were going to act on what they knew – going after OBL was a really big deal. He really was a threat to the national security, and there are military people who recognize that and were willing to risk their careers to take out Osama bin Laden because they realize that that is more important than their careers, and they probably realize also that if Obama tried to take them out at this point, that it would just accelerate his decline.
I’ll tell you something else: I think it’s being leaked because people in the military want Obama gone. This is completely in keeping with everything that you would expect to have happen. It makes sense to me. This was just one order that they could not accept. They knew they had the guy; they had the intel; they acted on it; they said, “We don’t care what Obama says; we’re going to take this guy out.” And then they did, and they don’t care what happens to them now. And I don’t think anything is going to happen. By the time I got this, Obama has already taken credit for this. “Oh, yeah, we meant to do this all the time.” So Obama is not going to go after any military commander, and then the information was leaked. So they know they have Obama cross-wired. Obama is stuck right now and the military knows that. It’s been leaked out. These are the kinds of conversations that would go on in the environment we have today.
MRS. RONDEAU: What do you think will happen from here?
LCDR FITZPATRICK: I think it will build from here. I think that the information has been leaked so that it will build from here. I think that there are military men and women who are really ticked off about Obama having gone into Libya.
MRS. RONDEAU: Does that mean that some of them still read or understand the U.S. Constitution?
LCDR FITZPATRICK: Yes, there are military commanders whom I know, and this was an opportunity for them to step in and say, “We’re going to take the shot.” This is something that Obama can’t stop. And this is a message for Mr. Obama, which is that he’s not in control of his armed forces anymore, and that is a very, very, very significant detail. That’s huge. If they don’t recognize Mr. Obama as the commander-in-chief, then all that can happen for Mr. Obama is bad. There are going to have to be other military people to make the same observation,and they’re going to have to make this publicly.
It is also consistent with what you’ve been writing and what I’ve been picking up on. Mr. Obama is found out. The military knows that Mr. Obama is an outlaw. They know that he is not commander-in-chief. That document that he put out on the internet the other day is a fake. Now imagine that you’re in the United States Armed Forces today, and you see this, and you’re a military commander, a senior officer, and you know what’s been going out there and what’s been said about this, and you know that it’s been an issue building and building and building…See, Mr. Obama cannot get away from the fact that he has now tried to pull the wool over our eyes again.
The military has been challenged, as you know, with Operation American Freedom. Every single military man and woman, whatever their rank, if they took the oath to the Constitution of the United States, they have an obligation to do something about finding out whether Mr. Obama is legit. That was written two years ago. Now, don’t you think that their obligation is multiplied by a very large number?
You have people in the military who are intelligence experts who are going to their boss and saying, “Excuse me, but that ‘document’ that was put out on the internet is a fraud.” The military commanders are now forced into a situation where they either have to act as they have acted or risk going along with this Mr. Obama for a while longer. I don’t think anybody in the military who’s in a position to know better is going to go along with this man anymore. He’s just crossed a line that he can’t back over.
Now, any military commander can stand up and say, “We know that he is a fake.”
MRS. RONDEAU: The American people saw hints of this when General McChrystal tried to meet with Obama and had to take a plane to catch up to Obama, who had gone to Denmark. He needed approval for something, and Obama would not give McChrystal the time of day.
Editor’s Note: McChrystal has since retired after having been “dismissed” by Obama for making alleged disparaging remarks about Obama and his National Security team.
LCDR FITZPATRICK: Again, you have people on both sides of the fence in the military. People have asked me, “What does the force structure look like on either side?” and I’ve told them, “I don’t know what I don’t know.” It’s been a year now since that citizen’s arrest warrant went out, and I had named military commanders then. Mike Mullen was one of the people whom I named, because Mullen knows better.
At some point, the military has to speak out. We know what the pressure looks like that’s coming from the veterans. I think this has been a culmination of a lot of different kinds of things. Military folk have been looking for the opportunity to out Obama, and now they have it. And they had it in a way that it’s a win-win situation for the country; it’s a win-win situation for the Navy Seals; it’s a win-win situation for the United States Armed Forces. There are very smart people in our military, and those smart people on the good side, the guys with the white hats, said, “This is our chance.” And now they’re leaking it, and it’s just going to blow up from here.
This is in the hands of two sitting grand juries; what they’re going to do with it remains to be seen. The U.S. Attorney in Knoxville knows what’s going on, and he knows that Obama is at the point where he cannot recover. He is out the door. And Trump is going after Obama. Obama made a very big deal of trying to play this off on The View, where he was making fun of it, and then that night he was at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner gathering, and he took a swipe at Trump. Well, Trump is one angry guy right now.
Dr. Jerome Corsi is plugged in to people in the military. It is consistent with what you see in the beginning of the decline of the rich and famous. Obama has been found out. You know that the vets are just pounding the door at the Pentagon, asking, “How can you now remain silent?” Well, they’re not remaining silent. He’s committing treason, and people in the military know that, and they’ve had enough. He really is committing the act of treason, and they can’t go along with him anymore.
The majority of people in this country believe that Mr. Obama is an outlaw, and that’s what it took. It took for us to get to this point after 2+ years for Obama to do enough things so that the country is largely against him. People in the military know that. They knew that their actions would be backed by the American people completely, and they took the shot.
MRS. RONDEAU: In Honduras, the president tried to override the country’s constitution to stay in office indefinitely, and the Supreme Court and military ousted him, saying, “No, you’re not.” That had the support of the people.
LCDR FITZPATRICK: Those people who were in a position to take action and wanted to take action knew that they needed the permission of the American people before they would stand up in the way that they just stood up. There is no place for this man to run. He is blatantly an outlaw. Watch how this thing unfolds.
MRS. RONDEAU: There’s no reason for someone to release a forgery if he has the real thing.
LCDR FITZPATRICK: Obama feels pressure coming from everywhere. He tried to put the genie back in the bottle and in doing what he did, has only hurt himself more. The military knows that they have been put on notice. Operation American Freedom has been out there for two years. Don’t get me wrong; I’m not saying that that is the notice. What I am saying is that it is but one notice out there where we’ve know that the military had an obligation to vet this guy. The vetting process to get a top-secret clearance, which I’ve held, is extraordinary, and they would have gone into this man’s background and found out…and they probably did!
The military, in the day, did not believe that they had the backing of the people. Barack Obama is not black; he’s a mulatto; but he is being played off as the “first black president.” The military wasn’t going to go after him and give up what they know about this guy until they had the support of the people. They’re looking at the poll numbers, which no longer show that Obama enjoys the favor of the majority of the country.
MRS. RONDEAU: No, not now.
LCDR FITZPATRICK: The military knows what the real numbers look like. So they knew that in taking out Osama in Laden, Obama would try to take credit. They set him up. Now they’re releasing information about how this really went down, just as they released information about how they got the Somali pirates and what happened to the Navy Seals that they were going to court-martial but didn’t. They played this thing beautifully.
I put this thing up at The Jaghunter and sent it to the SEAL whose name I gave you, and he said, “Wow, this is really big.” And it really is.
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND “INSIDER” REPORT DIFFER
by Sharon Rondeau
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.
Osama bin Laden claimed responsibility for the attacks on the U.S. on September 11, 2001
(May 3, 2011) — A report which is quickly gaining traction on the web suggests that Obama did not want to take out Osama bin Laden but was overridden by senior military commanders who ordered Navy Seals to carry out the successful operation.
Several reports lead back to Ulsterman, a writer claiming to have direct contact with a White House insider who has been revealing the machinations of the Obama regime and discord among senior executive branch officials. Ulsterman’s report of May 2, 2011 indicated that Obama and his adviser, Valerie Jarrett, did not want the military to kill Osama bin Laden and that Obama did not issue the order to do so.
Before Obama revealed an image purported to be a certified copy of his original birth certificate from Hawaii on April 27, Ulsterman had covered the eligibility question and other issues such as Obama’s Marxist background. Media sources concede that those who doubted Obama’s eligibility might still not be convinced because of questions surrounding his possible Indonesian citizenship and the need for authentication of the image released last Wednesday.
Mainstream editorials masquerading as news reports say that Obama “had ordered a successful mission to kill Osama bin Laden” that “was a political coup that will yield him benefits for months, perhaps years, to come.” They state that Obama gave the order which resulted in bin Laden’s death. A third report stated that “According to administration officials, the president took an increasingly hands-on role during the past two months – chairing nearly a half dozen national security meetings – as U.S. forces inched closer to launching the mission. Obama said that he authorized the operation last week, and gave the final orders Sunday.”
One report states that Obama was golfing but cut short his usual 18-hole session to return to the White House for a final meeting. Was he summoned by senior military members, or did he head the meeting? Why did he walk into the Oval Office in golf shoes?
The military members who killed bin Laden are reportedly “an elite special forces group unofficially called Seal Team 6.”
Blogger Nobarack has published a long-form birth certificate from Hawaii which contains a section at the bottom not found in Obama’s release.
The official statement issued by the White House said that “in the earliest days of the administration, the President formally instructed the intelligence community and his counterterrorism advisors to make the pursuit of Osama bin Laden, as the leader of al Qaeda, as a top priority.”
The leader of Hamas condemned bin Laden’s assassination, labeling bin Laden “a Holy Warrior.”
If the military acted on its own, without an order from Obama, what, if anything, does that mean in regard to Obama’s continued presence in the White House?
Does the military regard Obama as legitimate? Obama refused to answer Lt. Col. Terry Lakin’s questions and military officers sent Lakin to Ft. Leavenworth rather than allow him discovery. Last week, Obama released an image of an alleged birth certificate, the authenticity of which was questioned immediately.
The Post & Email contacted LCDR Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III regarding the recent Ulsterman story.
Does Obama resemble the leader of the free world or a childish narcissist whose golf game was interrupted by top military advisors? Photo courtesy of blogger Ulsterman.
LCDR FITZPATRICK: I read the report, and it is completely consistent with what I would expect to have happen.
MRS. RONDEAU: It is?
LCDR FITZPATRICK: Yes, and the significance of this is enormous. You might not remember this, but I do, about the Somali pirates that took the Maersk Alabama. They boarded the ship and took hostages, and they got into the lifeboat. Then the U.S.S. Bainbridge came onto the scene, a U.S. Navy ship, and eventually a couple of Navy Seals picked these clowns off in the lifeboat. The Somali pirates were shot dead after having kidnapped the captain of the ship.
The pirates reported themselves as being from Somalia, and they went out and captured the merchantman named Maersk Alabama. It ended up that they were in the lifeboat. The crew of the Alabama fought back, and these guys got away with the captain of the ship. The Navy came onto the scene, and the ship had Navy Seals on board. There were Navy Seals who took the shots and killed the men in the lifeboat who had held the captain captive.
Obama hadn’t wanted those guys shot; he didn’t want the Seals to take the shot. But they did, and Obama was furious.
Then soon after that, there were three Navy Seals who were brought up on charges from a separate incident. They were going to court-martial these guys. I had it all over The Jaghunter that they were going to court-martial them. They backed away from it, but Obama had the Seals and himself at cross-purposes, and they have been for a long time.
Then you get this information last night, and it’s consistent. If the Seals had an opportunity to go after bin Laden and they were told not to from the White House, and they said, “No, we’re going in anyway,” that’s a very big deal. I do not believe that the Seals would have their name tied to this unless they were really the unit that took out Osama bin Laden. You don’t just cavalierly assign or name the Seals in an operation like that. I believe they were involved, and the person whose name I gave you is directly tied into this warfare community in a way that I’m not and would be able to tell you more about what he is hearing. But it came in last night; I’m looking at it…I’ve told you before that there are people in the military and there are people in every other federal organization that we’ve talked about who know that Mr. Obama is an outlaw. There are people in the military who are really ticked-off about that, and this is completely in keeping with the kind of attitude that is invested in military men and women who believe that Obama is an unconstitutional commander-in-chief and, at the same time, have had enough of this political game. They had a chance to take out Osama bin Laden, and they’re not going to take any nonsense from the White House; they’re just going to go in and do it.
Now as this story unfolds, and it will, that notion is going to build and build and build. It will be interesting to see who the personalities are who are involved in this.
I believe that Mr. Obama is in descent. I believe that he is on his way out the door. Another aspect to this which is consistent with what I think is going on is that I believe that people in the military know that he’s not going to last very much longer and that he’s not the commander-in-chief. He’s a fake. If they had a shot to take Osama bin Laden and they went to the White House to get permission to do that and the answer came back, “No,” then it was “Excuse me, but you aren’t the head of the ship anymore.”
I put it up at The Jaghunter, and I haven’t had this kind of traffic for a long, long time. It’s going viral. The story has been picked up by a lot of people. It’s making the rounds.
Mr. Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya. He’s not lawfully holding office in the White House, and there are military people who know that and they do not recognize his authority. They also recognize that Mr. Obama is committing acts of treason against this country, and what you saw within the last week was, “We’ve had enough of you and your decisions and the people who are in the White House.” In other words, the military knows enough, and the Seals community would be just that group of people. They don’t take prisoners; these guys mean what they say and say what they mean. From what I understand, there was increased intelligence coming out of interrogations at Guantanamo Bay; that’s run by the Navy. And you know there are Seals down at Gitmo.
So this makes complete sense to me. This is the United States Armed Forces standing up to Mr. Obama and saying to him, “You’re not my commander-in-chief.”
MRS. RONDEAU: I had to read your story twice. After the second time, I realized there was a larger ramification if the military acted on its own to take out bin Laden.
LCDR FITZPATRICK: These are people in the military who are standing up and saying, “You’re not my commander-in-chief.” They’re ticked off about Terry Lakin being locked up; they’re ticked off about how our government has been running; they’re ticked off about all of the things that you and I are ticked off about. And this is one segment of the military that doesn’t take nonsense from anyone. If I felt bad about anything that was in the narrative, I wouldn’t have published it, but I read it and had it up instantly. It laid it all out, and this is the way that the military works.
MRS. RONDEAU: Would you say that you have expected this as things have been building up?
LCDR FITZPATRICK: I expected something as a flashback. I expected that at some point, somewhere, someone in the military was going to stand up and say, “Mr. Obama, you can go to Hades. We’ve had enough.” And this opportunity was just too big a deal to follow his orders. Because they went to the White House to get permission and didn’t receive it – it wasn’t that they expected to receive it; they knew what the answer was going to be, and they were going to act on what they knew – going after OBL was a really big deal. He really was a threat to the national security, and there are military people who recognize that and were willing to risk their careers to take out Osama bin Laden because they realize that that is more important than their careers, and they probably realize also that if Obama tried to take them out at this point, that it would just accelerate his decline.
I’ll tell you something else: I think it’s being leaked because people in the military want Obama gone. This is completely in keeping with everything that you would expect to have happen. It makes sense to me. This was just one order that they could not accept. They knew they had the guy; they had the intel; they acted on it; they said, “We don’t care what Obama says; we’re going to take this guy out.” And then they did, and they don’t care what happens to them now. And I don’t think anything is going to happen. By the time I got this, Obama has already taken credit for this. “Oh, yeah, we meant to do this all the time.” So Obama is not going to go after any military commander, and then the information was leaked. So they know they have Obama cross-wired. Obama is stuck right now and the military knows that. It’s been leaked out. These are the kinds of conversations that would go on in the environment we have today.
MRS. RONDEAU: What do you think will happen from here?
LCDR FITZPATRICK: I think it will build from here. I think that the information has been leaked so that it will build from here. I think that there are military men and women who are really ticked off about Obama having gone into Libya.
MRS. RONDEAU: Does that mean that some of them still read or understand the U.S. Constitution?
LCDR FITZPATRICK: Yes, there are military commanders whom I know, and this was an opportunity for them to step in and say, “We’re going to take the shot.” This is something that Obama can’t stop. And this is a message for Mr. Obama, which is that he’s not in control of his armed forces anymore, and that is a very, very, very significant detail. That’s huge. If they don’t recognize Mr. Obama as the commander-in-chief, then all that can happen for Mr. Obama is bad. There are going to have to be other military people to make the same observation,and they’re going to have to make this publicly.
It is also consistent with what you’ve been writing and what I’ve been picking up on. Mr. Obama is found out. The military knows that Mr. Obama is an outlaw. They know that he is not commander-in-chief. That document that he put out on the internet the other day is a fake. Now imagine that you’re in the United States Armed Forces today, and you see this, and you’re a military commander, a senior officer, and you know what’s been going out there and what’s been said about this, and you know that it’s been an issue building and building and building…See, Mr. Obama cannot get away from the fact that he has now tried to pull the wool over our eyes again.
The military has been challenged, as you know, with Operation American Freedom. Every single military man and woman, whatever their rank, if they took the oath to the Constitution of the United States, they have an obligation to do something about finding out whether Mr. Obama is legit. That was written two years ago. Now, don’t you think that their obligation is multiplied by a very large number?
You have people in the military who are intelligence experts who are going to their boss and saying, “Excuse me, but that ‘document’ that was put out on the internet is a fraud.” The military commanders are now forced into a situation where they either have to act as they have acted or risk going along with this Mr. Obama for a while longer. I don’t think anybody in the military who’s in a position to know better is going to go along with this man anymore. He’s just crossed a line that he can’t back over.
Now, any military commander can stand up and say, “We know that he is a fake.”
MRS. RONDEAU: The American people saw hints of this when General McChrystal tried to meet with Obama and had to take a plane to catch up to Obama, who had gone to Denmark. He needed approval for something, and Obama would not give McChrystal the time of day.
Editor’s Note: McChrystal has since retired after having been “dismissed” by Obama for making alleged disparaging remarks about Obama and his National Security team.
LCDR FITZPATRICK: Again, you have people on both sides of the fence in the military. People have asked me, “What does the force structure look like on either side?” and I’ve told them, “I don’t know what I don’t know.” It’s been a year now since that citizen’s arrest warrant went out, and I had named military commanders then. Mike Mullen was one of the people whom I named, because Mullen knows better.
At some point, the military has to speak out. We know what the pressure looks like that’s coming from the veterans. I think this has been a culmination of a lot of different kinds of things. Military folk have been looking for the opportunity to out Obama, and now they have it. And they had it in a way that it’s a win-win situation for the country; it’s a win-win situation for the Navy Seals; it’s a win-win situation for the United States Armed Forces. There are very smart people in our military, and those smart people on the good side, the guys with the white hats, said, “This is our chance.” And now they’re leaking it, and it’s just going to blow up from here.
This is in the hands of two sitting grand juries; what they’re going to do with it remains to be seen. The U.S. Attorney in Knoxville knows what’s going on, and he knows that Obama is at the point where he cannot recover. He is out the door. And Trump is going after Obama. Obama made a very big deal of trying to play this off on The View, where he was making fun of it, and then that night he was at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner gathering, and he took a swipe at Trump. Well, Trump is one angry guy right now.
Dr. Jerome Corsi is plugged in to people in the military. It is consistent with what you see in the beginning of the decline of the rich and famous. Obama has been found out. You know that the vets are just pounding the door at the Pentagon, asking, “How can you now remain silent?” Well, they’re not remaining silent. He’s committing treason, and people in the military know that, and they’ve had enough. He really is committing the act of treason, and they can’t go along with him anymore.
The majority of people in this country believe that Mr. Obama is an outlaw, and that’s what it took. It took for us to get to this point after 2+ years for Obama to do enough things so that the country is largely against him. People in the military know that. They knew that their actions would be backed by the American people completely, and they took the shot.
MRS. RONDEAU: In Honduras, the president tried to override the country’s constitution to stay in office indefinitely, and the Supreme Court and military ousted him, saying, “No, you’re not.” That had the support of the people.
LCDR FITZPATRICK: Those people who were in a position to take action and wanted to take action knew that they needed the permission of the American people before they would stand up in the way that they just stood up. There is no place for this man to run. He is blatantly an outlaw. Watch how this thing unfolds.
MRS. RONDEAU: There’s no reason for someone to release a forgery if he has the real thing.
LCDR FITZPATRICK: Obama feels pressure coming from everywhere. He tried to put the genie back in the bottle and in doing what he did, has only hurt himself more. The military knows that they have been put on notice. Operation American Freedom has been out there for two years. Don’t get me wrong; I’m not saying that that is the notice. What I am saying is that it is but one notice out there where we’ve know that the military had an obligation to vet this guy. The vetting process to get a top-secret clearance, which I’ve held, is extraordinary, and they would have gone into this man’s background and found out…and they probably did!
The military, in the day, did not believe that they had the backing of the people. Barack Obama is not black; he’s a mulatto; but he is being played off as the “first black president.” The military wasn’t going to go after him and give up what they know about this guy until they had the support of the people. They’re looking at the poll numbers, which no longer show that Obama enjoys the favor of the majority of the country.
MRS. RONDEAU: No, not now.
LCDR FITZPATRICK: The military knows what the real numbers look like. So they knew that in taking out Osama in Laden, Obama would try to take credit. They set him up. Now they’re releasing information about how this really went down, just as they released information about how they got the Somali pirates and what happened to the Navy Seals that they were going to court-martial but didn’t. They played this thing beautifully.
I put this thing up at The Jaghunter and sent it to the SEAL whose name I gave you, and he said, “Wow, this is really big.” And it really is.
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
Certificate of Live Birth Reveals Strange Morphology Of Obama's Adaptive Identity
Strange days continue as Obama suddenly decides, with the 2012 election looming, that Donald Trump and so-called 'birthers' are legitimately damaging his re-election bid with valid questions about his elibility, and permits the much maligned Department of Health in the State of Hawaii to release another digitized image of another alleged 1961 "Certificate of Live Birth", adding an attending, now conveniently deceased, doctor's name, a previously unidentified local registrar, and the name of the hospital he declared as his birthplace to the hollow saga of thin information about his identity.
by Pen Johannson
Editor of The Daily Pen
So, Donald Trump and the so called 'birthers' were right. There was another document hiding in Hawaii. Imagine that.
However, the biggest question everyone is asking about Obama's sudden and shocking capitulation in releasing a copy of an alleged 1961 "Certificate of Live Birth" is, "Why now?"
If the American people are victorious in reclaiming and maintaining their Constitutional sovereignty in the face of Obama's epic deception, it will be because they have come to understand the undeniable truth about our founder's definition of a natural-born citizen, not only as it applies to the eligibiity of a Presidential candidate, but how it applies to them!
Unfortunately, it appears, as American society declines into tragic plurality and pathetic political correctness, it has abandoned the very foundations established by ancient wisdom which made America the last bastion of hope for humanity among a world on the road to Perdition.
Natural-born citizenry is immutable. It does not change naturally and it becomes law at the moment of its endowment upon the individual. It is established outside of the ability of the individual to choose it at their birth. It is established by natural circumstance which never change unless the citiizenship status of the individual is artificially altered through man's legal process. Expatriation, foreign adoption, criminal extradition, foreign birth and emigration are the most common means by which an individual's natural born status ends.
Fleeing from the monarchal corruption of interallegiances, it was upon the ideal of Natural-born citizenry which our founders sought to establish the eligibility for being President of the most powerful, blessed, prosperous civilization in human history.
Obama's eligibility appears to be strangely adaptive, not immutable. His qualifications seem to evolve after his birth, not be comfirmatively requisite at the time it occurred. His identity seems to mutate with the ever changing demands of the politics-du-jour. Obama only reveals the answers required by the Constitutional eligibility mandate when "carnival barkers" threaten his hold on power or damage his electable image.
How do we know Obama is a fraud? Because a truly natural-born American citizen would never have to prove his eligibility after the fact. The evidence would be mete at the time it was demanded. If Obama were truly eligible to be President, no one would have ever doubted it.
Instead, Barack Obama did not reveal any evidence leading to a resolution about his covert identity for more than three years. And, he only did it at this particular time because not doing it was hurting his ability to get votes, not preserve the welfare of America. Obama cares nothing about America. He only cares what it can offer him and his brand of liberalism.
Let's understand this. Barack Obama has been sitting on original documented evidence supporting his long-doubted eligibility to hold the office of the President even as Terry Lakin, a decorated, honored military veteran and physician of 18 years, who asked for this information more than a year ago, is now sitting in prison for honorably attempting to uphold his oath to defend the Constitution of the United States.
So, we are supposed to embrace the revelation of a long-form birth certificate, which has supposedly existed for 50 years and which Barack Obama knew about while Lakin was pleading for it during his dutiful obligation to disobey illegal orders from an illegitimate command structure, risking the consequences thereof? Barack Obama had this information available to him before Lakin was charged, yet he allowed Lakin to be imprisoned anyway?
For more than four years, 35 lawsuits, millions of blogs, thousands of YouTube videos, thousands of hours of cable news pontification, denial after denial, disparagement, violence, hatred, anger, the imprisonment of an American hero, and, most injurious, a global degradation of confidence in Barack Obama, he suddenly injects another piece of evidence into the eligibility circumference.
Why now? The 2012 election comes to mind. A powerful billionaire comes to mind, but the idea of Barack Obama actually doing this for the purpose of upholding the blood-ransomed sovereignty and honor of the U.S. Constitution somehow is just hard to believe. Ideologically driven political animals like Obama can't even see the price paid by worthier others for his current gig.
Keep in mind, the reason for requesting the information on this document was to have access to the facts about Obama's natal biography which could be investigated for the ultimate purpose of ensuring that Obama's presidency upholds the blood-ransomed sovereignty of the United States Constitution...not trying to make a brash billionaire presidential candidate stop threating Obama's fraudulent usurpation of power and stop asking questions about his real eligibility.
Maybe Obama finally decided it was time to validate the claims of so-called birthers by responding with what they requested, just to shut them up. Right? After all, everyone thought the birthers were on to something. Right?
The important document here is the Constitution, right? Unfortunately, media shills for Obama desperately want this transient presentation of another "official" birth certificate to finally close the door.
Here are a few well placed questions. Certainly Obama will answer them with same straightforwardness as he has demonstrated with this newly presented, transparent piece of evidence.
1. The official NVSD template of a blank federal 1961 "Certificate of Live Birth" issued by the U.S. Department of Health has an Amendment Section provided below the signature section near the bottom, in which information about medical or identity alterations are placed when a record is updated after birth. For example, a baby who is adopted by a different father will have an amendment in this section with the date of the change. Why is this section omitted from the image of Obama's "Certificate of Live Birth"?
2. Why did Obama pay legal defense costs, whatever the amount, to his lawyers at Perkins Coie to keep people from seeing this? A band of Obama's lawyers swarmed into court rooms to licentiously demand this document not be revealed? This is what they didn't want people to know about? Really?
3. Recall, the election laws of the state of Hawaii explicitly require that state's party authorities to submit an Official Certification of Nomination which specifically indicates that a candidate for placement on Hawaii's presidential ballot must be "constitutionally eligible for the office of the president". The 2008 Democrat Party of Hawaii's (DPH) chairman, Brian Schatz, refused to certify Obama's constitutional eligibility for placement on the Hawaiian ballot because he, apparently, could not find this "Certificate of Live Birth" document, even though it was allegedly available in a building adjacent to the election commission's office. Instead, the national Democratic National Convention, headed by Nancy Pelosi, circumvented the jurisdiction of the DPH and declared Obama constitutionally eligible, apparently without this document! Therefore, if this document has existed for 50 years, why was the DPH denied access to it in August of 2008 prior to the filing of that state's Official Certification of Nomination? If this document was present in Hawaii, why was it not provided to that state's Democrat Party authority as evidence in support of Obama's constitutional eligibility? If this document has existed since 1961, why did Brian Schatz and the DPH refuse to use it as evidence to certify Obama's Constitutional eligibility for placement on the Hawaiian ballot? Why could Mr. Schatz not find this document?
4. The liberal media and Obama's press corp have been telling the world that the only official birth certificate issued by Hawaii was the 2007 "CertificaTION of Live Birth" they sold us in 2008. What purpose, then, does this "Certificate of Live Birth" document serve if the "Certification of Live Birth" satisfies proof of Natural-born eligibility? Weren't we all told that the initial cover document was sufficient? Now, it appears Obama disagrees with his defenders.
5. Why is the "Certificate of Live Birth" document image presented with the same hatched, green-colored and patterned background image as the other "only official birth certificate in Hawaii", the 2007 Hawaiian "Certification of Live Birth", posted on Obama-friendly web sites in October, 2008? Is this another digital image or an image of a direct copy? Has the original paper document been released for examination?
6. Why is this document not photostatic black like an actual copy would have been from the hospital in 1961? Is this an image of the document filed by that hospital?
7. How did Governor Abercrombie miss this document during his search for it weeks ago? Is this the entirety of the complete documentation of Obama's natal records held in the state of Hawaii by all agencies, medical facilities and their personnel?
8. If this document is a copied original from the Hawaiian Department of Health, will Kapiolani release their "exact copy" version for comparison and verification? The two documents should be an exact match.
9. If Obama was born in the same hospital as the Nordyke twins only a few hours earlier, why is the local registrar's name different on Obama's alleged "Certificate of Live Birth"? Wouldn't the same registrar attest to both of these birth registrations if they occurred within the same Hawaiian Vital Statistics Office? Was Obama's birth registered in a different location than the Nordyke twins?
10. As an "original" 1961 document, why does the registrar at that time allow the term "African" to be transcribed onto the document knowing that no such term prescribed by the U.S. Department of Health is allowed for official natal data reporting to the National Vital Statistics Division of the U.S. Department of Health? The appearance of the term "African" on the 2007 Hawaiian 'Certification of Live Birth' was excused as a benign inclusion without explanation by the registrant, but that doesn't explain how an originating official allowed this ambiguous reference to the identity of Obama's alleged father. What is the officially defined identity of Obama's parents?
11. Why is there a strange blended, hatch-green border matching the document body, encasing and around the limits of the "Certificate of Live Birth" image, as if the document image was imposed on a digital template background, like the bogus, counterfeit 'Certification of Live Birth' was shown to have? Why not just copy the original document and release it? Why "process" the image with digital "treatments" first?
12. Why does the image appear to 'break away' at the left margin as if to roll away from the scanning device, revealing other documented information adjacent to the contents of the "Certificate of Live Birth"? What is this other information to the left?
13. If we assume the same individuals were in their respective positions in 1961, Leo Bernstein was the Director of the Hawaiian Department of Health and Charles Bennett was the Deputy Registrar. Where is the embossed stamp of the State of Hawaii along with the required signatures of this Director of the Dept. of Health and this Deputy Registrar? Notably, their signatures would exist inside the aforementioned, omitted 'Amendment Section'.
14. The attending physician identified in the document as David Sinclair, who allegedly signed this document with a black filament pen, is dead, adding yet another of more than 20 people who might have witnessed Obama's birth but whom are now conveniently dead. Are there any other individuals alive today who saw this guy's birth?
15. If this document always existed, why did Obama not provide it to prevent the imprisonment of Terry Lakin, the passage of state elibility bills and the publication of multiple blogs, books and articles?
16. Why did Obama allow these doubts to exist so long in the consciousness of the people he is supposed to instill confidence in? Was it a game of "political gotcha", and if so, is that the kind of man we want to be the leader of a nation? Who votes for a lying, dishonest, game-playing conspirator with an agenda to string along his country in order to merely attempt to make his political opposition look like fools and ridicule them? Who wins that game? How does this "unify" a nation? This does not gain peace. This is how wars begin. This does not preserve the relationship of trust between a people and their chosen leaders. This is how politicians are eradicated and disposed of.
17. One document down. 21 to go. Let's move on to the Columbia transcripts, shall we?
If this settles the question of the birth location, Obama's alleged father was not a U.S. citizen when Obama was born and Obama's citizenship status while residing in Indonesia remains a mystery...so we continue to wait for a verdict on his legitimacy as a natural-born president.
Let's just allow this cook for awhile before making conclusions. If it accurately and authentically confirms the entire roster of Obama's bizarre natal biography, excellent. It's about time.
However, history has proven that Obama does nothing without a calculated political benefit in mind. The man is incapable of imagining himself unqualified for anything. He is a notorious, radical power monger who desires Perdition for anyone who questions his qualifications. He is not gracious. He is not merciful. He is not honorable. He is not kind. He is intelligent, vengeful, proud, divisive and corrupt. Therefore, there is no reason to think this new seed of information is provided for any other reason that to advance his fraudulent image for political reasons in the coming election cycle. Tragically, now, he's added two more unwitting strangers to his covert saga who, by the way, are not available to answer questions about their role in this strange man's natal history. Suprise, suprise.
We've waited for four years for Obama to come clean...we can wait as long as it takes to confirm this new evidence.
When the truth is on your side, there is no fear of eternity. Obama appears to be afraid of 2012.
Strange days continue as Obama suddenly decides, with the 2012 election looming, that Donald Trump and so-called 'birthers' are legitimately damaging his re-election bid with valid questions about his elibility, and permits the much maligned Department of Health in the State of Hawaii to release another digitized image of another alleged 1961 "Certificate of Live Birth", adding an attending, now conveniently deceased, doctor's name, a previously unidentified local registrar, and the name of the hospital he declared as his birthplace to the hollow saga of thin information about his identity.
by Pen Johannson
Editor of The Daily Pen
So, Donald Trump and the so called 'birthers' were right. There was another document hiding in Hawaii. Imagine that.
However, the biggest question everyone is asking about Obama's sudden and shocking capitulation in releasing a copy of an alleged 1961 "Certificate of Live Birth" is, "Why now?"
If the American people are victorious in reclaiming and maintaining their Constitutional sovereignty in the face of Obama's epic deception, it will be because they have come to understand the undeniable truth about our founder's definition of a natural-born citizen, not only as it applies to the eligibiity of a Presidential candidate, but how it applies to them!
Unfortunately, it appears, as American society declines into tragic plurality and pathetic political correctness, it has abandoned the very foundations established by ancient wisdom which made America the last bastion of hope for humanity among a world on the road to Perdition.
Natural-born citizenry is immutable. It does not change naturally and it becomes law at the moment of its endowment upon the individual. It is established outside of the ability of the individual to choose it at their birth. It is established by natural circumstance which never change unless the citiizenship status of the individual is artificially altered through man's legal process. Expatriation, foreign adoption, criminal extradition, foreign birth and emigration are the most common means by which an individual's natural born status ends.
Fleeing from the monarchal corruption of interallegiances, it was upon the ideal of Natural-born citizenry which our founders sought to establish the eligibility for being President of the most powerful, blessed, prosperous civilization in human history.
Obama's eligibility appears to be strangely adaptive, not immutable. His qualifications seem to evolve after his birth, not be comfirmatively requisite at the time it occurred. His identity seems to mutate with the ever changing demands of the politics-du-jour. Obama only reveals the answers required by the Constitutional eligibility mandate when "carnival barkers" threaten his hold on power or damage his electable image.
How do we know Obama is a fraud? Because a truly natural-born American citizen would never have to prove his eligibility after the fact. The evidence would be mete at the time it was demanded. If Obama were truly eligible to be President, no one would have ever doubted it.
Instead, Barack Obama did not reveal any evidence leading to a resolution about his covert identity for more than three years. And, he only did it at this particular time because not doing it was hurting his ability to get votes, not preserve the welfare of America. Obama cares nothing about America. He only cares what it can offer him and his brand of liberalism.
Let's understand this. Barack Obama has been sitting on original documented evidence supporting his long-doubted eligibility to hold the office of the President even as Terry Lakin, a decorated, honored military veteran and physician of 18 years, who asked for this information more than a year ago, is now sitting in prison for honorably attempting to uphold his oath to defend the Constitution of the United States.
So, we are supposed to embrace the revelation of a long-form birth certificate, which has supposedly existed for 50 years and which Barack Obama knew about while Lakin was pleading for it during his dutiful obligation to disobey illegal orders from an illegitimate command structure, risking the consequences thereof? Barack Obama had this information available to him before Lakin was charged, yet he allowed Lakin to be imprisoned anyway?
For more than four years, 35 lawsuits, millions of blogs, thousands of YouTube videos, thousands of hours of cable news pontification, denial after denial, disparagement, violence, hatred, anger, the imprisonment of an American hero, and, most injurious, a global degradation of confidence in Barack Obama, he suddenly injects another piece of evidence into the eligibility circumference.
Why now? The 2012 election comes to mind. A powerful billionaire comes to mind, but the idea of Barack Obama actually doing this for the purpose of upholding the blood-ransomed sovereignty and honor of the U.S. Constitution somehow is just hard to believe. Ideologically driven political animals like Obama can't even see the price paid by worthier others for his current gig.
Keep in mind, the reason for requesting the information on this document was to have access to the facts about Obama's natal biography which could be investigated for the ultimate purpose of ensuring that Obama's presidency upholds the blood-ransomed sovereignty of the United States Constitution...not trying to make a brash billionaire presidential candidate stop threating Obama's fraudulent usurpation of power and stop asking questions about his real eligibility.
Maybe Obama finally decided it was time to validate the claims of so-called birthers by responding with what they requested, just to shut them up. Right? After all, everyone thought the birthers were on to something. Right?
The important document here is the Constitution, right? Unfortunately, media shills for Obama desperately want this transient presentation of another "official" birth certificate to finally close the door.
Here are a few well placed questions. Certainly Obama will answer them with same straightforwardness as he has demonstrated with this newly presented, transparent piece of evidence.
1. The official NVSD template of a blank federal 1961 "Certificate of Live Birth" issued by the U.S. Department of Health has an Amendment Section provided below the signature section near the bottom, in which information about medical or identity alterations are placed when a record is updated after birth. For example, a baby who is adopted by a different father will have an amendment in this section with the date of the change. Why is this section omitted from the image of Obama's "Certificate of Live Birth"?
2. Why did Obama pay legal defense costs, whatever the amount, to his lawyers at Perkins Coie to keep people from seeing this? A band of Obama's lawyers swarmed into court rooms to licentiously demand this document not be revealed? This is what they didn't want people to know about? Really?
3. Recall, the election laws of the state of Hawaii explicitly require that state's party authorities to submit an Official Certification of Nomination which specifically indicates that a candidate for placement on Hawaii's presidential ballot must be "constitutionally eligible for the office of the president". The 2008 Democrat Party of Hawaii's (DPH) chairman, Brian Schatz, refused to certify Obama's constitutional eligibility for placement on the Hawaiian ballot because he, apparently, could not find this "Certificate of Live Birth" document, even though it was allegedly available in a building adjacent to the election commission's office. Instead, the national Democratic National Convention, headed by Nancy Pelosi, circumvented the jurisdiction of the DPH and declared Obama constitutionally eligible, apparently without this document! Therefore, if this document has existed for 50 years, why was the DPH denied access to it in August of 2008 prior to the filing of that state's Official Certification of Nomination? If this document was present in Hawaii, why was it not provided to that state's Democrat Party authority as evidence in support of Obama's constitutional eligibility? If this document has existed since 1961, why did Brian Schatz and the DPH refuse to use it as evidence to certify Obama's Constitutional eligibility for placement on the Hawaiian ballot? Why could Mr. Schatz not find this document?
4. The liberal media and Obama's press corp have been telling the world that the only official birth certificate issued by Hawaii was the 2007 "CertificaTION of Live Birth" they sold us in 2008. What purpose, then, does this "Certificate of Live Birth" document serve if the "Certification of Live Birth" satisfies proof of Natural-born eligibility? Weren't we all told that the initial cover document was sufficient? Now, it appears Obama disagrees with his defenders.
5. Why is the "Certificate of Live Birth" document image presented with the same hatched, green-colored and patterned background image as the other "only official birth certificate in Hawaii", the 2007 Hawaiian "Certification of Live Birth", posted on Obama-friendly web sites in October, 2008? Is this another digital image or an image of a direct copy? Has the original paper document been released for examination?
6. Why is this document not photostatic black like an actual copy would have been from the hospital in 1961? Is this an image of the document filed by that hospital?
7. How did Governor Abercrombie miss this document during his search for it weeks ago? Is this the entirety of the complete documentation of Obama's natal records held in the state of Hawaii by all agencies, medical facilities and their personnel?
8. If this document is a copied original from the Hawaiian Department of Health, will Kapiolani release their "exact copy" version for comparison and verification? The two documents should be an exact match.
9. If Obama was born in the same hospital as the Nordyke twins only a few hours earlier, why is the local registrar's name different on Obama's alleged "Certificate of Live Birth"? Wouldn't the same registrar attest to both of these birth registrations if they occurred within the same Hawaiian Vital Statistics Office? Was Obama's birth registered in a different location than the Nordyke twins?
10. As an "original" 1961 document, why does the registrar at that time allow the term "African" to be transcribed onto the document knowing that no such term prescribed by the U.S. Department of Health is allowed for official natal data reporting to the National Vital Statistics Division of the U.S. Department of Health? The appearance of the term "African" on the 2007 Hawaiian 'Certification of Live Birth' was excused as a benign inclusion without explanation by the registrant, but that doesn't explain how an originating official allowed this ambiguous reference to the identity of Obama's alleged father. What is the officially defined identity of Obama's parents?
11. Why is there a strange blended, hatch-green border matching the document body, encasing and around the limits of the "Certificate of Live Birth" image, as if the document image was imposed on a digital template background, like the bogus, counterfeit 'Certification of Live Birth' was shown to have? Why not just copy the original document and release it? Why "process" the image with digital "treatments" first?
12. Why does the image appear to 'break away' at the left margin as if to roll away from the scanning device, revealing other documented information adjacent to the contents of the "Certificate of Live Birth"? What is this other information to the left?
13. If we assume the same individuals were in their respective positions in 1961, Leo Bernstein was the Director of the Hawaiian Department of Health and Charles Bennett was the Deputy Registrar. Where is the embossed stamp of the State of Hawaii along with the required signatures of this Director of the Dept. of Health and this Deputy Registrar? Notably, their signatures would exist inside the aforementioned, omitted 'Amendment Section'.
14. The attending physician identified in the document as David Sinclair, who allegedly signed this document with a black filament pen, is dead, adding yet another of more than 20 people who might have witnessed Obama's birth but whom are now conveniently dead. Are there any other individuals alive today who saw this guy's birth?
15. If this document always existed, why did Obama not provide it to prevent the imprisonment of Terry Lakin, the passage of state elibility bills and the publication of multiple blogs, books and articles?
16. Why did Obama allow these doubts to exist so long in the consciousness of the people he is supposed to instill confidence in? Was it a game of "political gotcha", and if so, is that the kind of man we want to be the leader of a nation? Who votes for a lying, dishonest, game-playing conspirator with an agenda to string along his country in order to merely attempt to make his political opposition look like fools and ridicule them? Who wins that game? How does this "unify" a nation? This does not gain peace. This is how wars begin. This does not preserve the relationship of trust between a people and their chosen leaders. This is how politicians are eradicated and disposed of.
17. One document down. 21 to go. Let's move on to the Columbia transcripts, shall we?
If this settles the question of the birth location, Obama's alleged father was not a U.S. citizen when Obama was born and Obama's citizenship status while residing in Indonesia remains a mystery...so we continue to wait for a verdict on his legitimacy as a natural-born president.
Let's just allow this cook for awhile before making conclusions. If it accurately and authentically confirms the entire roster of Obama's bizarre natal biography, excellent. It's about time.
However, history has proven that Obama does nothing without a calculated political benefit in mind. The man is incapable of imagining himself unqualified for anything. He is a notorious, radical power monger who desires Perdition for anyone who questions his qualifications. He is not gracious. He is not merciful. He is not honorable. He is not kind. He is intelligent, vengeful, proud, divisive and corrupt. Therefore, there is no reason to think this new seed of information is provided for any other reason that to advance his fraudulent image for political reasons in the coming election cycle. Tragically, now, he's added two more unwitting strangers to his covert saga who, by the way, are not available to answer questions about their role in this strange man's natal history. Suprise, suprise.
We've waited for four years for Obama to come clean...we can wait as long as it takes to confirm this new evidence.
When the truth is on your side, there is no fear of eternity. Obama appears to be afraid of 2012.
OUT OF ORDER: Obama’s Certificate Number Is Based On Geography, Not Chronological Birth Order!
by Penbrook One
REPORT REVEALS SHOCKING PROOF: Contrary to recent implications, new evidence supports that Barack Obama was not actually delivered in Kapi’olani hospital, as records suggest, but, rather, he was merely examined there by a private practitioner in the days following his birth, which triggered the validation of an administratively issued “Certificate of Live Birth” registration, not a hospital generated birth certificate representing an actual delivery which was later numbered due to an 'externally registered' birth.
By Pen Johannson and Dan Crosby
Of The Daily Pen
The one thing we've come to realize about Obama's covert identity is that if there suddenly appears information alleging to confirm it, it is highly probable that the information is unintentionally wrong or intentionally misleading. As Obama recently said, "We don't have time for this silliness."
The evidence herein is somewhat belaboring and intensive, but necessary to understand in order to place Obama’s recently revealed, highly questionable Health Department-issued “Certificate of Live Birth” Registration in its accurate context. Forget for a moment that the document is probably forged or that it confirms or denies anything. Just look at the data and measure it against the facts and what we know.
If you can ignore the fact that the name of the attesting local registrar who signed Obama's Certificate of Live Birth appears to be a possible forger's play on the word for a Hawaiian musical instrument, "UKULELE" (U. K. L. Lee), we will begin this report under the auspices that this alleged "Certificate of Live Birth" document image is an authentic record and that no conspiracy was required in order to create it, even though we know better.
Odd named local registrar signature on Obama's alleged certificate appears to be a forger's play on the Hawaiian word, "UKULELE" (U.K.L. Lee)
Remember the constroversy in August of 2009, when alleged, unnamed hackers affixed the name E.F. Lavender to a document purported to be an Obama Kenyan Birth Registration? It appears what's forged for the goose is also faked for the gander.
It makes one wonder when one of these brilliant document-smiths will create convincing documentation which finally reveals that Obama's father was actually a U.S. citizen at the time of Obama's birth. The only way to make Obama eligible is to convince the world his father was a U.S. citizen. What? No takers? We must come to accept that Obama's eligibility is that far from being valid.
However, regardless of its authenticity, we can also conclude it was not released by Kapi’olani hospital because it remains undocumented by that facility that Obama was actually born there. Rather, this document would have been released by the Hawaiian Department of Health based on that state's long-standing municipal vital records laws which mandate the creation of such an official birth record based, not only upon indigenous birth occurrences, but also residential circumstances of the parents preceding the birth.
TRICKY NUMBERS
Let's assume this "Certificate of Live Birth" document image is an authentic representation of an official record for a moment. It doesn't change the essential questions which remain about Obama's natural born identity. Was he born to parents who were U.S. citizens? Was he actually delivered in a U.S. Hospital at birth, not just examined there post-delivery by an attending physician? Did he lose his natural born status as an adopted resident of Indonesia?
Since the 2008 disclosure of Obama’s previously “only official” Hawaiian “Certification of Live Birth” just days before being ensconced to the Oval Office, many continue to wonder why Obama’s birth registration number is out of sequence with at least two other registration numbers issued by the Hawaiian Department of Health in the days after Obama’s birth.
The answer to this question may have been answered in the 1961 Vital Statistics of United States Report in which it clarifies the manner in which birth records are assigned registration numbers. The guidelines in the report declare that registration numbers are assigned and stamped in the upper right margin of the certificates by the main office of each state's Health department office in geographic order of their reception in the main office from the multiple local offices around each state. The certificates are not assigned numbers according to chronological birth order or alphabetic order.
Why is this significant in relation to Obama's Certificate of Live Birth? Here's why.
This number ordering process was put in place by federal standards because the birth statistics from each state in 1961 were reported from each state to the U.S. Department of Health, National Vital Statistics Office, based a 50-percent sampling method, FROM EVEN-NUMBERED RECORDS ONLY! (Section 5-8 Natality).
This means that, since the NVSD counted only those statistics from even-numbered certificates, in order to ensure a level of accuracy representing actual regional natality statistics for the whole geography of the United States, birth registration numbers had to be assigned geographically, not chronologically, because there was no way to ensure that all the EVEN-NUMBERED samples from births occurring in a given yearly time frame would not result from only densely populated regions, like large cities.
The listing of birth registrations below illustrates how regional ordering of registration numbers affects the chronological order. Notice that the first three birth registrations occuring in Regions 1,2 & 3 are assigned lower numbers than the first birth registration in Region 4 for a birth which occurred one day earlier. This is because the birth registration for Region 4 was the first one received by the main office which is 189 miles from the local registration office in Region 4. The main office of this State's Health Department is in Region 1. The registration numbers are assigned in their order of reception by the main office, not the chronological occurrence of the birth.
However, depending on the location of the newspaper in relationship to the local registration office in each region, the birth announcements might be printed in entire batches from just one region or a culmination of several small regions, which ever effectively filled the allocated space in the paper while announcing births as soon as possible without mixing the regions too much.
In Obama's case, his birth was registered in a regional office which was covered by the same newspapers as the main office of the Health Department. Therefore, his announcement would have been published as one of a batch of registrations from one or just a few regional registrations. The larger the batch, the more space required in the paper to cover an entire region. So, smaller batches and smaller regions were published first.
Therefore, because walk-in registrations and non-hospital births were more rare than the thousands of traditional hospital or facility births, they had to be isolated by regional offices in order make sure they were represented in the national vital statistics report. If birth registration numbers were assigned only based on chronological order, these rural births, walk-in registrations or non-hospital births might inadvertently all fall on odd-numbered records among the thousands of other births in the reporting year, state-wide. This would present inaccurate data about rural birth rates, birth health and rural demographics.
For example, let's say there were 10,000 births which were registered within the city of Honolulu in 1961 and there were another 1000 births which occurred in the sparsely populated rural areas outside of Honolulu during that same time for a total of 11,000 births in 1961.
If all 11,000 births were simply collected by the main office of the Health Department and assigned numbers based on their chronological occurence, the 1,000 rural birth might risk being registered with odd-numbers among the other 10,000 conventional hospital births. This would create inaccurate data about the non-hospital birth rate, which tends to be a measurement of births among lower income rural communities, remote indigenous populations, foreign immigrants and home deliveries, when it was reported to the U.S. Department of Health's National Vital Statistics Division for its annual report, which was based on a 50-percent reporting method of even-numbered certificates only. Obama's birth registration was allegedly assigned an odd-number among the other birth registrations for his regional office.
REGIONAL BIRTH REGISTRATION NUMBERS VS. CHRONOLOGICAL BIRTH REGISTRATION NUMBERS...ILLUSTRATED
The tables below illustrate the difference in accuracy between reporting natal statistics based on a CHRONOLOGICAL BIRTH NUMBERING ORDER and report natal statistics based on REGIONAL BIRTH NUMBERING ORDER.
In Table 1, we have listed the births which took place the same week as Obama's in chronological order and assigned them numbers based their order of occurrence. The birth registrations in grey occurred as a result of unattended, non-hospital or "walk-in" registration births which may not have occurred in Hawaii but which were registered as native births under Hawaiian laws or administrative procedures which do not align with the U.S. Constitution's "evidence for eligibility" mandate. These births were assigned numbers in chronological order along with all the other births occuring this week in hospitals around the state.
Given that the state of Hawaii was obligated to report only those natal statistics from even-numbered registrations, it would report only one (Obama's birth) of the six "walk-in" registrations, because only one had an even numbered registration. Therefore, only two of these unconventional births would be reported in the NVSD Report for Hawaii for this week, which is completely inaccurate for these rare birth rates.
However, Table 2 reflects the same births occurring the week of Obama's, only this time, the births are shown in their order of announcement in the newspapers based on REGIONAL ORDER and are assigned registration numbers base on their order of regional birth registration in local offices, not chronological order state-wide.
Notice that the same six "non-hospital" births are shown here, regionally, but are assigned different numbers than they would have been assigned if they were ordered chronologically. The same six "walk-in" registration births are now numbered based on their regional occurence and are now accounted for accurately even with the 50% - Even-Number reporting method used by the U.S. Department of Health in 1961, based on their regional order, not their chronological order. Although Obama's birth would not be reported based on his ODD-Numbered registration, the NVSD report would show a total of six "rural" or "non-hospital" total births for the state, which is an accurate accounting.
If the Hawaiian Department of Health assigned registration numbers based only on chronological order, the six rural births risk being underrepresented when the U.S. Department of Health requests Hawaii's EVEN-NUMBERED natal statistics for 1961 because those rural births might happen to occur in chronological order in which they are numbered with too many ODD NUMBERS and, therefore, be lost among the massive quantity of city births and, thus, the rural birth rate would be under-reported to the U.S. Department of Health.
Therefore, in order for the U.S. Department of Health to maximize accuracy and present the U.S. Natal Statistics report for as many geographic birth regions as possible, the numbers assigned by the main office in each state had to maximize sets of EVEN-NUMBERED certificates from as many geographic regions in the state as possible, regardless of the time of birth. Otherwise, if the numbers were only assigned based on chronological birth order, the records of births taking place in a large city might be represented by thousands of even numbers, whereas none or an "undercounted" number of rural births might be innaccurately represented if, by chance, they just happened fall on the remaining odd-numbered records.
The birth announcements shown here were those actually published with Barack Obama's announcement. They have been re-arranged from their original publishing order to demonstrate the results of chronological numbering over regional numbering. If the births in red happended to be walk-in registrations from a remote region of the state, those births would only have one birth assigned with an even-numbered registration qualified to be reported by the state to the U.S. Department of Health's NVSD. Therefore, since only one registration is even-numbered (out of six) the Natal Statistics Report would inaccurately reflect a birth rate 67% lower than it actually was for this region (2 births instead 6 births) based on counting only even-numbers. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Health enacted regional number sequences which would account for all six births in this situation.
Because rural births occur at a lower and slower rate than city births, rural births have a higher probability of being under-reported if they were only included in a chronological reporting order, rather than a geographic "regional batch" reporting order. What is the probability of one rural birth falling on a chronologically ordered ODD NUMBER among hundreds of traditional hospital births which would be more accurately represented by a 50-percent sampling of EVEN NUMBERS? Statistics for non-city or non-hospital births might not be reported at all if they were included in a chronological numbering order.
Therefore, the main offices of the state health departments were instructed to assign the numbering of certificates in the order of reception from each geographic registration location, not chronological sequence, in order to maximize report sampling and to ensure the best possible reporting accuracy from as many regions as possible, not just where populations were dense and where birth quantities were high.
This is a probable explanation for Obama's non-sequential birth registration number which is sequentially higher than registration numbers for births occurring after his. His number was assigned based on a registration which originated in a regional office or location not used to register births occurring at Kapi'olani. Obama's birth registration may have been a "walk-in" registration which relied upon a doctor's signature after examination of a newborn Obama, but not a birthing physician's signature present at the time of birth.
Since the birth announcements were published based on the order in which they were received from the main office of the health department, which assigned registration numbers based on the order they were received from regional local registration offices, it is reasonable to think that Obama's birth registration number was part of a smaller batch of registrations in that particular region. This is why the Nordyke twins birth were reported a week later. Their registration numbers, although lower in the sequence, came from largest region and the largest batch which required they be "carried over" into the following weeks column space in the paper.
THE REGIONAL BIRTH REGISTRATION PROCESS
Diagram showing "walk-in" and rural non-hospital birth registration process. The accuracy for reporting regional birth registrations is higher than reporting chronological order registrations because because births occurring in low population centers tend to be under-reported by the U.S. Department of Health's 50% method. These unconventional births had to be independently numbered by their reception based on regional or local office origins of the state's Health Department because chronological birth registrations did not accurately account for small numbers of these registrations which might fall on ODD-Numbered registrations. Natal statistics reveal that more 17,000 births occured in Hawaii in 1961. That is an average of 330 births per week from various islands and regions which had to be accounted for and reported to the NVSD. Of these births, nearly 17% were non-hospital births among citizen population and around 40% for non-residential, rural, non-citizen and remote indigenous population. However, Hawaii was unique because of its remote location, indigenous culture and permeable migration. Many births occurred in Hawaii which were never recorded in the NVSD report due to under-registration. Non-conventional birth registrations and walk-in registrations occurred at a much lower rate in other states which increased the need for isolating walk-in registrations and non-hospital registrations.
This evidence reveals that Obama’s non-sequential birth registration number is the result of his registration being isolated because it was not a traditional hospital birth. His number was assigned based on the birth being registered in a regional office not used by the hospital which Obama claims to have been born in, rendering the possibility that his “Certificate of Live Birth” Registration issued by the Hawaiian Vital Records office is merely a record of birth registration legally created by the Health Department under HRS 338-17.8, after baby Obama was examined by a doctor, at Kapi’olani hospital, who could attest to his live birth, post-delivery.
These recently discovered sources show that Obama’s birth registration number was assigned by the state’s main office of the Hawaiian Department of Health after his birth registration originated in a regional office not used by the hospital to register births actually occurring within its facility.
Documentation provided by Volume 1 of the “1961 Vital Statistics Report of the United States” further supports the factual plausibility that Obama’s birth occurred in a geographic location other than Hawaii and was not registered in the traditional manner as other children born in the hospital, locally. This evidence supports the claim that his non-sequential birth registration number is indeed the result of his birth being registered in an alternative local office, not the typical office used by the hospital.
OBAMA'S KAPI'OLANI BIRTHMATES?
Recall, according to copies of birth records released by the hospital, the Nordyke’s twin girls were delivered just 19 hours after Obama was born, supposedly just down the hall from where Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham was allegedly staying in Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital on Saturday afternoon of August 5th, 1961. The Nordyke twins, Susan and Gretchen, were issued sequential birth registration numbers, 151-61-10637 and 151-61-10638, respectively.
The Nordyke's released two photostatic copies of their hospital generated "Certificates of Live Birth" in 2009. Contrarily, Obama released a Health Department generated version of a same titled document last week. The differences are significant and in need of investigation because the Nordyke's document an actual delivery within the hospital while Obama's documents only a birth registration by the HDOH after he was examined by a doctor from the named hospital.
With the revelation of a belated image of an alleged, original 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” registration record, released by the Hawaiian Department of Health, not the hospital, it is now unanimously accepted that Obama’s birth registration number is 151-61-10641, which is also confirmed by its updated version of 151-1961-10641 on the previously exalted “Certification of Live Birth” and, most importantly, which is a number larger than both the twins even though he was born chronologically before them.
Even number assigned for Gretchen Nordyke which would have been reported to the U.S. NVSD Natal Statistics office.
Obama's alleged original 1961 Department of Health issued Certificate of Live Birth shown here to omit the critical "amendment section" containing entry spaces for medical information, change of parentage by adoption, signatures of the Health director and Deputy Registrar, and birth weight and height.
Before we buy in to the strange document signed by Registrar Ukulele, we need to recall that Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17.8 states the following:
(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the Director of Health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
As we all have become familiar, the statute explicitly states that the Director of Health in 1961 was obligated to issue a birth certificate “provided that proof had been submitted to the Director of Health that the parents had declared Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth…or adoption of such child”, regardless of the location of that birth.
We know Obama’s parents lived in Hawaii for at least one year preceding his birth or adoption. Therefore, this law would have applied if he were born elsewhere or adopted and was taken to Hawaii where the birth was registered.
Notice the dates of the signatures on the newly released Certificate of Live Birth registration issued by the Health Department. The alleged signature of Obama’s mother was documented on Monday, August 7, 1961, the earliest day available to sign the registration. Obama was born the evening of Friday, August 4th, which means government offices were closed on Saturday the 5th, and Sunday the 6th, but the hospital was not.
The documents also reveal that they were signed by an attending physician and received by a local registrar, in different offices, three days apart, despite being signed on the same day by the parent.
Therefore, the Nordyke's Kapi'olani generated birth certificates were signed on August 11th by the registrar, three days later than Obama's registration, because the Nordyke's certificates were two of more than 100 which occurred in that registration office during that week. Obama's was signed on August 8th and recorded three days earlier because his Certificate was merely one of four registration records occurring in that local office. The process moved faster for Obama's registration because there were fewer certificates for that local registrar to process than the quantity of registrations processed in the office used by the city's main hospital where the Nordyke's registered. This occurred because of the 50-percent sampling and geographic number order process required by the U.S. Department and its effect on Obama's "externally" registered birth in another registration office not used by the hospital.
This evidence suggests the possibility that baby Obama was examined at Kapi’olani within days after his birth by a physician able to legally attest an original birth record issued, not by the hospital, but by the Hawaiian Department of Health (HDOH).Kapi’olani hospital has never issued or confirmed an original record for the birth of Barack Obama within its facility to date. However, the HDOH is able to legally name the hospital in its original "Certificate of Live Birth" Regisration based on the legal fact that, if it is the location of the first examination of a newborn child by a physician there, the signature of the doctor triggers the birth location in absence of any other birth location information.
Simply put, the evidence suggests that Obama was not born in Kapi'olani, but he may have been examined for the first time there.
REVELATIONS
This week, as Obama released a long-form version of a Health Department issued “Certificate of Live Birth” document we find it adds merely three more pieces of information about his natal biography than we previously knew before from the fallow “Certification of Live Birth” heavily lauded by his defenders as the 'holy grail' of his eligibility.
Now, with this new and improved ‘Holier Grail”, historical information from the U.S. Department of Health shows that this document only detracts from Obama’s effort to confirm his eligibility and that it would best be described as a state-issued, non-standard ‘Long-form Certificate of Live Birth Registration’ created by administrative procedure as a result of legal confirmation, not a hospital as a result of an actual delivery. We are already accustomed to the fact that the Hawaiian Department of Health revises in document header titles willy-nilly, whenever it seems convenient to Obama.
The information provided in Obama's recently revealed HDOH "Certificate of Live Birth" Registration document, when combined with an understanding of Hawaiian vital statistics records laws, municipal reporting procedures, and federal Natality reporting guidelines, shows that this “Certificate of Live Birth” registration could have been legally produced by the HDOH without Obama necessarily actually being delivered in the hospital named within it, and that the doctor, by affixing his signature, was only required to attest an original record based on his examination of the newborn Obama Jr., not necessarily as an attending (birthing) physician present during the actual delivery, but rather as the first physician to actually examine the child alive and in good health.
This evidence supports the fact that the on-going, original questions of Obama's actual birth location remain decisively unanswered and that this document could actually be an elaborate hoax by brazened forgers.The Nordyke twins were born on Saturday, August 5th, but their “Certificates of Live Birth” were not attested by the attending physician of record, assigned numbers and registered by the Department of Health until Thursday, August 11th. Obama’s birth was registered on Tuesday, August 8th even though it occurred just hours before the Nordyke’s. However, both documents for all three births were signed by the parents on the same day, Monday, August 7th.
Keep in mind, Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” was released by the Department of Health, not the alleged hospital of record. Although the Health Department was obligated to provide him with a “Certificate of Live Birth” in 1961, via the administrative process mandated by HRS 338-17.8, his birth would not actually have to occur in the Hospital stated on the record in order for this record to be created. However, as provided by HRS 338-5, after baby Obama had been examined by an “attending” physician sometime between August 5th and August 8th at the hospital, the Department of Health was able to create the official record of birth after the doctor’s signed approval, containing the name of the hospital where the examination took place.
Essentially, the Hawaiian Department of Health does not issue an official birth certificate under the provision of HRS 338-17.8 until a board certified physician has examined the child in an official medical facility of record.
So, how was Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” assigned a larger number than his birth-mates?
As mentioned, Section 5-8 of the ‘Vital Statistics of the United States: Volume 1 – Natality” report states:
Sampling of Birth Records
The manner in which records are numbered greatly reduces the sampling variability of totals for geographic areas. Records are numbered in the primary state offices of vital statistics as they are received from the local offices. The assignment of the last digit in the number is not selective and systematic sampling of even-numbered records may be assumed to be unbiased. Furthermore, because the records are always in geographic order BEFORE numbering, twice the same count of births occurring in the great majority of counties is the same as the corresponding figure based on all records.
The key words are, "records are numbered in the primary state offices as they are received and are always in geographic order before numbering." Essentially, this means that Obama's birth registration, which was received by the main office before the Nordyke twins', was assigned a higher number because it was received by the main office in geographic order, not chronological order. Obama's birth was not registered in the same office as the Nordyke twins' birth.
This confirms that, in 1961, the main office of the Hawaiian Department of Health assigned registration numbers based on the order of reception of birth registrations from various local registration offices, not from the hospitals of the births. Therefore, if Obama’s birth registration was included with the Nordyke twins and other births occurring at Kapiolani in same HDOH birth registration office, we should expect the Nordyke's numbers to be assigned in order of reception at the same time as Obama's!!
However, since it is likely that Obama's birth was not registered in the same office as the Nordyke twins, who were actually born in Kapi’olani hospital, Obama’s birth registration was assigned a number based on its "geographic order", not its chronological order, of registration.
If Obama was actually born in Kapi’olani hospital on August 4th, 1961, why was his birth registered in a different geographic location as indicated by the non-sequential number, on August 8th, which would therefore trigger a registration number out of order with the Nordyke twins' birth of August 5th who were registered with all the other births in Kapi’olani?
DIFFERENT LOCAL REGISTRARS
Aside from the fact that Obama’s 'Certificate of Live Birth' Registration released by the Hawaiian Department of Health appears to be affixed with a signature which appears to play on the Hawaiian word, "UKULELE" (U.K.L. Lee), it is also represented by different local registrar than is shown on the Nordyke’s Hospital version of the Certificate of Live Birth. A different local registrar worked in each of the four branch offices in which births were registered in Hawaii. Obama's birth was registered in an office which is not the office use by Kapi’olani to register births occurring in its facility.
The name of a local registrar is not associated with other birth certificates for births which actually occurred at Kapi’olani and which were attested by physicians who actually delivered those births. This registrar worked in a branch office not used by Kapi’olani to register births. This is why Obama’s birth registration number is out of sequence with other births at the same time as his.
OUT OF ORDER TOO: THE NEWSPAPER ANNOUNCEMENTS
Last month, The Daily Pen’s Dan Crosby, published the results of his investigation of the procedures used to publish birth announcements in Hawaii. He found historical evidence which supports that fact that Obama’s birth did not occur in Kapi’olani, but which was registered in a different local office after he was examined by a doctor at Kapi’olani on August 7th, 1961.
Crosby went to Hawaii to research and investigate the cavalcade of ambiguous information related to Obama’s covert natal history including the origins and protocols used to publish the birth announcements in 1961. He focused on the manner in which the Hawaiian Department of Health and local hospitals coordinated vital statistics information and how the chain of information from the Hospital to the Hawaiian Department of Health resulted in “Weekly Health Bureau Statistics” announcements published in the local papers.
Crosby found evidence that the order in which the announcements were published was not random or chronological. In fact, he discovered they were published by the order of birth registration numbers assigned by the main Office of Vital Records which, in turn, were based on reception from various local registration branches. He discovered that, regardless of when the birth may have occurred, the registration number, assigned by the geographic order of the registration offices, determined the order of the announcements.
This is why Obama’s birth announcements occur near the bottom of each column in each newspaper even though there are births which occurred before and after his but which are published above his in the papers. This is because the births published above his all occurred in the same place and were registered in the same office and then passed to the central main office. The numbers were, therefore, ordered by the main office of the Health department in reference to their geographic registration order, not their chronological occurrence.
An investigation of the addresses of the birth registrations reveals that they migrate proximally to either a medical facility or to a local registration office. This is logical because most pregnant women would desire a hospital in close proximity once contractions began.
The birth announcements and ordering based on geographic registration location are shown below as they appear in the two versions of the newspapers.
Mr. and Mrs. Samuel K. Haas Sr. 849-A 11th Ave. 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Charles J. Staley 1319 Anapa St. 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Richard R. Kitson Apt. 11, 1635 Clark St. 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. George P. Ayau Sr. 87-143 Lillana St., Malll 7/31/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Thaddeus J. Raymond 1371 Haloa Drive 7/30/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Robert I. Arakawa 935-B Hausten St., 8/1/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Herbert Y. Takahashi 56 Nanea Ave, Wahiawa 8/2/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Allington K. Brown Maunawill Road, Kallua 8/2/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Cirillo V. Caperto 918 Puuhale Road 8/3/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Samuel L. M. Mokuahi Sr 732 Laukea St. 8/2/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Peter C. Kamealoha Jr. 441 McNeill St. 8/3/1961
Mr. and Mrs. John R. Clifford Sr. 2624 Maunawai Place 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Edward W. Walker 1660 S. King St., 8/7/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Wallace M. Durkin 3813 Radford Drive 8/7/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Mike M. Nagaishi 2687 Gardenia 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Glenn E. Earnest 1258 Wilhelmina Rise 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Edward S. H. Chun 45-440 Akimala St., Kaheohe 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. John R. Waidelich 937 18th Ave. 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Emmett P. Simpson 2752 Kahiti St. 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Melvin K. F. Liu 45-548 Keaahala Road, Kaheohe 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Richard D. Wright 91-939 Kalapu St., Ewa Beach, Ewa 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Andrew A. M. Hatchle 2420 Kaululaau St. 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs Harry Y.W. Wong 463 Lawelwe St. 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Ernesto Kim
Note that the announcements are in the exact same order in both papers. Also, notice Obama’s birth registration announcement nearer the bottom of the order in the last group while the birth dates appear to be grouped rather than ordered from the top of the column to the bottom. This indicates they are indeed grouped by geographic registration occurrence as they are received in batches from each branch location by the main Health Department office, as prescribed by the guidelines described in the NVSD report. Otherwise, the birth order would be published based on either alphabetical or chronological order, which they are not, as obviously shown here. This is an indication that Obama’s birth registration was received by the main office of the Hawaiian Department of Health from a location other than the office used to register births occurring in Kapi’olani.
Obama's announcement was published on August 12th and 13th of the editions of the Star and Sunday Advertiser in 1961. The Nordyke's announcement was publish the following week. Obama's announcement was published earlier than his alleged "birthmates" because his registration was among fewer which were processed as part of a batch of "walk-in" registrations from another local office. His record was processed faster and earlier and was able to be fit within the space provided by the newspaper for that batch of registration records that week. The larger overall quantity of registrations containing the Nordyke's records had to be carried over to the following week because their large batch required three more days to process and be allocated space in the papers.
Obama’s DOH “Certificate of Live Birth” Registration omits the “Amendment section” from its lower margin which is present on the hospital generated version and contains space available for amendments, dates of examinations and medical information. It is also used to show the signatures of the Director of Health and the Deputy Registrar. This is absent from Obama’s HDOH document because it was not generated by the hospital and this doctor was not present at his birth and did not preside over later amendments, such as Obama’s adoption by Lolo Soetoro.
CONCLUSIONS
Obama’s birth was not registered in the same Health Department office as the Nordyke twins and hundreds of other births occurring the week of July 30 – August 5th at Kapi’olani hospital. Birth numbering order was established by federal standards according to geography not chronological order of births, in order to maximize accuracy of natal statistics reporting over as wide as possible a registration area throughout the entire U.S. Chronological ordering alone presented a highly disproportionate risk of under-reported rural, non-hospital and non-resident births due to the U.S. Department of Health's 50%-reporting method based only on even-numbered certificates.
If state's reported only even-numbered births from all births in chronological order, and the walk-in registrations from a particular region all happened to fall on "odd-numbered" birth schedules, they would not be reported accurately for that region. This is why regional reporting was enacted over chronological reporting. However, regional reporting also created non-sequential numbering with respect to birth date and time.
The publication of Obama’s birth announcement near the bottom of the columns of the two newspapers, printed lower than announcements for births which occurred after his, indicates that his birth registration document was received and ordered in accordance with geographic location, not chronological order or alphabetic order. This, therefore, indicates that Obama's birth actually occurred in a location other than Kapi'olani hospital.
Dr. David Sinclair was not present during the delivery of Barack Obama. However, since he was the first physician to examine baby Obama and his mother at Kapi’olani on August 7th or 8th, he is legally bound to record his signature as the attending physician of record at that time. Per HRS 338, the naming of the hospital is subsequent to the naming of the doctor where the examination, not the birth, took place.
Since Dr. Sinclair was not the birthing physician, he could not officially attest to Obama’s birth weight, which is absent from the HDOH Certificate of Live Birth Registration.
The name of local registrar is different on Obama’s HDOH Certificate of Live Birth Registration because Obama’s birth was not registered in the same branch office of the Vital Statistics office as births occurring at Kapi’olani.
As testified by the 1961 Vital Statistics of the United States Report, Obama’s birth registration number is non-sequential with other births at the same time because it was assigned by the main office of the HDOH after it was received from one of multiple registration offices in Hawaii. The HDOH assigned Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth a registration number based on its geographic registration location, not chronological occurrence in a hospital.
Obama’s recently revealed Certificate of Live Birth was created and issued by the Hawaiian Department of Health through administrative procedures based on HRS 338 and Administrative Rules. It was not generated by any hospital and was only attested by an attending physician after an examination of the newborn Obama qualified the HDOH to issue an original birth certificate provided by HRS 338-17.8.
Therefore, the geographic location of Obama’s actual emergence from his mother’s womb remains a mystery.
Regardless, the identity of Obama’s foreign father is confirmed in this suspicious but newly released Certificate of Live Birth Registration, which disqualifies Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of the presidency even if he was shown by a hospital generated birth certificate to have been born in Hawaii.
Apparently, even a document forger can agree on that.
by Penbrook One
REPORT REVEALS SHOCKING PROOF: Contrary to recent implications, new evidence supports that Barack Obama was not actually delivered in Kapi’olani hospital, as records suggest, but, rather, he was merely examined there by a private practitioner in the days following his birth, which triggered the validation of an administratively issued “Certificate of Live Birth” registration, not a hospital generated birth certificate representing an actual delivery which was later numbered due to an 'externally registered' birth.
By Pen Johannson and Dan Crosby
Of The Daily Pen
The one thing we've come to realize about Obama's covert identity is that if there suddenly appears information alleging to confirm it, it is highly probable that the information is unintentionally wrong or intentionally misleading. As Obama recently said, "We don't have time for this silliness."
The evidence herein is somewhat belaboring and intensive, but necessary to understand in order to place Obama’s recently revealed, highly questionable Health Department-issued “Certificate of Live Birth” Registration in its accurate context. Forget for a moment that the document is probably forged or that it confirms or denies anything. Just look at the data and measure it against the facts and what we know.
If you can ignore the fact that the name of the attesting local registrar who signed Obama's Certificate of Live Birth appears to be a possible forger's play on the word for a Hawaiian musical instrument, "UKULELE" (U. K. L. Lee), we will begin this report under the auspices that this alleged "Certificate of Live Birth" document image is an authentic record and that no conspiracy was required in order to create it, even though we know better.
Odd named local registrar signature on Obama's alleged certificate appears to be a forger's play on the Hawaiian word, "UKULELE" (U.K.L. Lee)
Remember the constroversy in August of 2009, when alleged, unnamed hackers affixed the name E.F. Lavender to a document purported to be an Obama Kenyan Birth Registration? It appears what's forged for the goose is also faked for the gander.
It makes one wonder when one of these brilliant document-smiths will create convincing documentation which finally reveals that Obama's father was actually a U.S. citizen at the time of Obama's birth. The only way to make Obama eligible is to convince the world his father was a U.S. citizen. What? No takers? We must come to accept that Obama's eligibility is that far from being valid.
However, regardless of its authenticity, we can also conclude it was not released by Kapi’olani hospital because it remains undocumented by that facility that Obama was actually born there. Rather, this document would have been released by the Hawaiian Department of Health based on that state's long-standing municipal vital records laws which mandate the creation of such an official birth record based, not only upon indigenous birth occurrences, but also residential circumstances of the parents preceding the birth.
TRICKY NUMBERS
Let's assume this "Certificate of Live Birth" document image is an authentic representation of an official record for a moment. It doesn't change the essential questions which remain about Obama's natural born identity. Was he born to parents who were U.S. citizens? Was he actually delivered in a U.S. Hospital at birth, not just examined there post-delivery by an attending physician? Did he lose his natural born status as an adopted resident of Indonesia?
Since the 2008 disclosure of Obama’s previously “only official” Hawaiian “Certification of Live Birth” just days before being ensconced to the Oval Office, many continue to wonder why Obama’s birth registration number is out of sequence with at least two other registration numbers issued by the Hawaiian Department of Health in the days after Obama’s birth.
The answer to this question may have been answered in the 1961 Vital Statistics of United States Report in which it clarifies the manner in which birth records are assigned registration numbers. The guidelines in the report declare that registration numbers are assigned and stamped in the upper right margin of the certificates by the main office of each state's Health department office in geographic order of their reception in the main office from the multiple local offices around each state. The certificates are not assigned numbers according to chronological birth order or alphabetic order.
Why is this significant in relation to Obama's Certificate of Live Birth? Here's why.
This number ordering process was put in place by federal standards because the birth statistics from each state in 1961 were reported from each state to the U.S. Department of Health, National Vital Statistics Office, based a 50-percent sampling method, FROM EVEN-NUMBERED RECORDS ONLY! (Section 5-8 Natality).
This means that, since the NVSD counted only those statistics from even-numbered certificates, in order to ensure a level of accuracy representing actual regional natality statistics for the whole geography of the United States, birth registration numbers had to be assigned geographically, not chronologically, because there was no way to ensure that all the EVEN-NUMBERED samples from births occurring in a given yearly time frame would not result from only densely populated regions, like large cities.
The listing of birth registrations below illustrates how regional ordering of registration numbers affects the chronological order. Notice that the first three birth registrations occuring in Regions 1,2 & 3 are assigned lower numbers than the first birth registration in Region 4 for a birth which occurred one day earlier. This is because the birth registration for Region 4 was the first one received by the main office which is 189 miles from the local registration office in Region 4. The main office of this State's Health Department is in Region 1. The registration numbers are assigned in their order of reception by the main office, not the chronological occurrence of the birth.
However, depending on the location of the newspaper in relationship to the local registration office in each region, the birth announcements might be printed in entire batches from just one region or a culmination of several small regions, which ever effectively filled the allocated space in the paper while announcing births as soon as possible without mixing the regions too much.
In Obama's case, his birth was registered in a regional office which was covered by the same newspapers as the main office of the Health Department. Therefore, his announcement would have been published as one of a batch of registrations from one or just a few regional registrations. The larger the batch, the more space required in the paper to cover an entire region. So, smaller batches and smaller regions were published first.
Therefore, because walk-in registrations and non-hospital births were more rare than the thousands of traditional hospital or facility births, they had to be isolated by regional offices in order make sure they were represented in the national vital statistics report. If birth registration numbers were assigned only based on chronological order, these rural births, walk-in registrations or non-hospital births might inadvertently all fall on odd-numbered records among the thousands of other births in the reporting year, state-wide. This would present inaccurate data about rural birth rates, birth health and rural demographics.
For example, let's say there were 10,000 births which were registered within the city of Honolulu in 1961 and there were another 1000 births which occurred in the sparsely populated rural areas outside of Honolulu during that same time for a total of 11,000 births in 1961.
If all 11,000 births were simply collected by the main office of the Health Department and assigned numbers based on their chronological occurence, the 1,000 rural birth might risk being registered with odd-numbers among the other 10,000 conventional hospital births. This would create inaccurate data about the non-hospital birth rate, which tends to be a measurement of births among lower income rural communities, remote indigenous populations, foreign immigrants and home deliveries, when it was reported to the U.S. Department of Health's National Vital Statistics Division for its annual report, which was based on a 50-percent reporting method of even-numbered certificates only. Obama's birth registration was allegedly assigned an odd-number among the other birth registrations for his regional office.
REGIONAL BIRTH REGISTRATION NUMBERS VS. CHRONOLOGICAL BIRTH REGISTRATION NUMBERS...ILLUSTRATED
The tables below illustrate the difference in accuracy between reporting natal statistics based on a CHRONOLOGICAL BIRTH NUMBERING ORDER and report natal statistics based on REGIONAL BIRTH NUMBERING ORDER.
In Table 1, we have listed the births which took place the same week as Obama's in chronological order and assigned them numbers based their order of occurrence. The birth registrations in grey occurred as a result of unattended, non-hospital or "walk-in" registration births which may not have occurred in Hawaii but which were registered as native births under Hawaiian laws or administrative procedures which do not align with the U.S. Constitution's "evidence for eligibility" mandate. These births were assigned numbers in chronological order along with all the other births occuring this week in hospitals around the state.
Given that the state of Hawaii was obligated to report only those natal statistics from even-numbered registrations, it would report only one (Obama's birth) of the six "walk-in" registrations, because only one had an even numbered registration. Therefore, only two of these unconventional births would be reported in the NVSD Report for Hawaii for this week, which is completely inaccurate for these rare birth rates.
However, Table 2 reflects the same births occurring the week of Obama's, only this time, the births are shown in their order of announcement in the newspapers based on REGIONAL ORDER and are assigned registration numbers base on their order of regional birth registration in local offices, not chronological order state-wide.
Notice that the same six "non-hospital" births are shown here, regionally, but are assigned different numbers than they would have been assigned if they were ordered chronologically. The same six "walk-in" registration births are now numbered based on their regional occurence and are now accounted for accurately even with the 50% - Even-Number reporting method used by the U.S. Department of Health in 1961, based on their regional order, not their chronological order. Although Obama's birth would not be reported based on his ODD-Numbered registration, the NVSD report would show a total of six "rural" or "non-hospital" total births for the state, which is an accurate accounting.
If the Hawaiian Department of Health assigned registration numbers based only on chronological order, the six rural births risk being underrepresented when the U.S. Department of Health requests Hawaii's EVEN-NUMBERED natal statistics for 1961 because those rural births might happen to occur in chronological order in which they are numbered with too many ODD NUMBERS and, therefore, be lost among the massive quantity of city births and, thus, the rural birth rate would be under-reported to the U.S. Department of Health.
Therefore, in order for the U.S. Department of Health to maximize accuracy and present the U.S. Natal Statistics report for as many geographic birth regions as possible, the numbers assigned by the main office in each state had to maximize sets of EVEN-NUMBERED certificates from as many geographic regions in the state as possible, regardless of the time of birth. Otherwise, if the numbers were only assigned based on chronological birth order, the records of births taking place in a large city might be represented by thousands of even numbers, whereas none or an "undercounted" number of rural births might be innaccurately represented if, by chance, they just happened fall on the remaining odd-numbered records.
The birth announcements shown here were those actually published with Barack Obama's announcement. They have been re-arranged from their original publishing order to demonstrate the results of chronological numbering over regional numbering. If the births in red happended to be walk-in registrations from a remote region of the state, those births would only have one birth assigned with an even-numbered registration qualified to be reported by the state to the U.S. Department of Health's NVSD. Therefore, since only one registration is even-numbered (out of six) the Natal Statistics Report would inaccurately reflect a birth rate 67% lower than it actually was for this region (2 births instead 6 births) based on counting only even-numbers. Therefore, the U.S. Department of Health enacted regional number sequences which would account for all six births in this situation.
Because rural births occur at a lower and slower rate than city births, rural births have a higher probability of being under-reported if they were only included in a chronological reporting order, rather than a geographic "regional batch" reporting order. What is the probability of one rural birth falling on a chronologically ordered ODD NUMBER among hundreds of traditional hospital births which would be more accurately represented by a 50-percent sampling of EVEN NUMBERS? Statistics for non-city or non-hospital births might not be reported at all if they were included in a chronological numbering order.
Therefore, the main offices of the state health departments were instructed to assign the numbering of certificates in the order of reception from each geographic registration location, not chronological sequence, in order to maximize report sampling and to ensure the best possible reporting accuracy from as many regions as possible, not just where populations were dense and where birth quantities were high.
This is a probable explanation for Obama's non-sequential birth registration number which is sequentially higher than registration numbers for births occurring after his. His number was assigned based on a registration which originated in a regional office or location not used to register births occurring at Kapi'olani. Obama's birth registration may have been a "walk-in" registration which relied upon a doctor's signature after examination of a newborn Obama, but not a birthing physician's signature present at the time of birth.
Since the birth announcements were published based on the order in which they were received from the main office of the health department, which assigned registration numbers based on the order they were received from regional local registration offices, it is reasonable to think that Obama's birth registration number was part of a smaller batch of registrations in that particular region. This is why the Nordyke twins birth were reported a week later. Their registration numbers, although lower in the sequence, came from largest region and the largest batch which required they be "carried over" into the following weeks column space in the paper.
THE REGIONAL BIRTH REGISTRATION PROCESS
Diagram showing "walk-in" and rural non-hospital birth registration process. The accuracy for reporting regional birth registrations is higher than reporting chronological order registrations because because births occurring in low population centers tend to be under-reported by the U.S. Department of Health's 50% method. These unconventional births had to be independently numbered by their reception based on regional or local office origins of the state's Health Department because chronological birth registrations did not accurately account for small numbers of these registrations which might fall on ODD-Numbered registrations. Natal statistics reveal that more 17,000 births occured in Hawaii in 1961. That is an average of 330 births per week from various islands and regions which had to be accounted for and reported to the NVSD. Of these births, nearly 17% were non-hospital births among citizen population and around 40% for non-residential, rural, non-citizen and remote indigenous population. However, Hawaii was unique because of its remote location, indigenous culture and permeable migration. Many births occurred in Hawaii which were never recorded in the NVSD report due to under-registration. Non-conventional birth registrations and walk-in registrations occurred at a much lower rate in other states which increased the need for isolating walk-in registrations and non-hospital registrations.
This evidence reveals that Obama’s non-sequential birth registration number is the result of his registration being isolated because it was not a traditional hospital birth. His number was assigned based on the birth being registered in a regional office not used by the hospital which Obama claims to have been born in, rendering the possibility that his “Certificate of Live Birth” Registration issued by the Hawaiian Vital Records office is merely a record of birth registration legally created by the Health Department under HRS 338-17.8, after baby Obama was examined by a doctor, at Kapi’olani hospital, who could attest to his live birth, post-delivery.
These recently discovered sources show that Obama’s birth registration number was assigned by the state’s main office of the Hawaiian Department of Health after his birth registration originated in a regional office not used by the hospital to register births actually occurring within its facility.
Documentation provided by Volume 1 of the “1961 Vital Statistics Report of the United States” further supports the factual plausibility that Obama’s birth occurred in a geographic location other than Hawaii and was not registered in the traditional manner as other children born in the hospital, locally. This evidence supports the claim that his non-sequential birth registration number is indeed the result of his birth being registered in an alternative local office, not the typical office used by the hospital.
OBAMA'S KAPI'OLANI BIRTHMATES?
Recall, according to copies of birth records released by the hospital, the Nordyke’s twin girls were delivered just 19 hours after Obama was born, supposedly just down the hall from where Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham was allegedly staying in Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital on Saturday afternoon of August 5th, 1961. The Nordyke twins, Susan and Gretchen, were issued sequential birth registration numbers, 151-61-10637 and 151-61-10638, respectively.
The Nordyke's released two photostatic copies of their hospital generated "Certificates of Live Birth" in 2009. Contrarily, Obama released a Health Department generated version of a same titled document last week. The differences are significant and in need of investigation because the Nordyke's document an actual delivery within the hospital while Obama's documents only a birth registration by the HDOH after he was examined by a doctor from the named hospital.
With the revelation of a belated image of an alleged, original 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” registration record, released by the Hawaiian Department of Health, not the hospital, it is now unanimously accepted that Obama’s birth registration number is 151-61-10641, which is also confirmed by its updated version of 151-1961-10641 on the previously exalted “Certification of Live Birth” and, most importantly, which is a number larger than both the twins even though he was born chronologically before them.
Even number assigned for Gretchen Nordyke which would have been reported to the U.S. NVSD Natal Statistics office.
Obama's alleged original 1961 Department of Health issued Certificate of Live Birth shown here to omit the critical "amendment section" containing entry spaces for medical information, change of parentage by adoption, signatures of the Health director and Deputy Registrar, and birth weight and height.
Before we buy in to the strange document signed by Registrar Ukulele, we need to recall that Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17.8 states the following:
(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the Director of Health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
As we all have become familiar, the statute explicitly states that the Director of Health in 1961 was obligated to issue a birth certificate “provided that proof had been submitted to the Director of Health that the parents had declared Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth…or adoption of such child”, regardless of the location of that birth.
We know Obama’s parents lived in Hawaii for at least one year preceding his birth or adoption. Therefore, this law would have applied if he were born elsewhere or adopted and was taken to Hawaii where the birth was registered.
Notice the dates of the signatures on the newly released Certificate of Live Birth registration issued by the Health Department. The alleged signature of Obama’s mother was documented on Monday, August 7, 1961, the earliest day available to sign the registration. Obama was born the evening of Friday, August 4th, which means government offices were closed on Saturday the 5th, and Sunday the 6th, but the hospital was not.
The documents also reveal that they were signed by an attending physician and received by a local registrar, in different offices, three days apart, despite being signed on the same day by the parent.
Therefore, the Nordyke's Kapi'olani generated birth certificates were signed on August 11th by the registrar, three days later than Obama's registration, because the Nordyke's certificates were two of more than 100 which occurred in that registration office during that week. Obama's was signed on August 8th and recorded three days earlier because his Certificate was merely one of four registration records occurring in that local office. The process moved faster for Obama's registration because there were fewer certificates for that local registrar to process than the quantity of registrations processed in the office used by the city's main hospital where the Nordyke's registered. This occurred because of the 50-percent sampling and geographic number order process required by the U.S. Department and its effect on Obama's "externally" registered birth in another registration office not used by the hospital.
This evidence suggests the possibility that baby Obama was examined at Kapi’olani within days after his birth by a physician able to legally attest an original birth record issued, not by the hospital, but by the Hawaiian Department of Health (HDOH).Kapi’olani hospital has never issued or confirmed an original record for the birth of Barack Obama within its facility to date. However, the HDOH is able to legally name the hospital in its original "Certificate of Live Birth" Regisration based on the legal fact that, if it is the location of the first examination of a newborn child by a physician there, the signature of the doctor triggers the birth location in absence of any other birth location information.
Simply put, the evidence suggests that Obama was not born in Kapi'olani, but he may have been examined for the first time there.
REVELATIONS
This week, as Obama released a long-form version of a Health Department issued “Certificate of Live Birth” document we find it adds merely three more pieces of information about his natal biography than we previously knew before from the fallow “Certification of Live Birth” heavily lauded by his defenders as the 'holy grail' of his eligibility.
Now, with this new and improved ‘Holier Grail”, historical information from the U.S. Department of Health shows that this document only detracts from Obama’s effort to confirm his eligibility and that it would best be described as a state-issued, non-standard ‘Long-form Certificate of Live Birth Registration’ created by administrative procedure as a result of legal confirmation, not a hospital as a result of an actual delivery. We are already accustomed to the fact that the Hawaiian Department of Health revises in document header titles willy-nilly, whenever it seems convenient to Obama.
The information provided in Obama's recently revealed HDOH "Certificate of Live Birth" Registration document, when combined with an understanding of Hawaiian vital statistics records laws, municipal reporting procedures, and federal Natality reporting guidelines, shows that this “Certificate of Live Birth” registration could have been legally produced by the HDOH without Obama necessarily actually being delivered in the hospital named within it, and that the doctor, by affixing his signature, was only required to attest an original record based on his examination of the newborn Obama Jr., not necessarily as an attending (birthing) physician present during the actual delivery, but rather as the first physician to actually examine the child alive and in good health.
This evidence supports the fact that the on-going, original questions of Obama's actual birth location remain decisively unanswered and that this document could actually be an elaborate hoax by brazened forgers.The Nordyke twins were born on Saturday, August 5th, but their “Certificates of Live Birth” were not attested by the attending physician of record, assigned numbers and registered by the Department of Health until Thursday, August 11th. Obama’s birth was registered on Tuesday, August 8th even though it occurred just hours before the Nordyke’s. However, both documents for all three births were signed by the parents on the same day, Monday, August 7th.
Keep in mind, Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” was released by the Department of Health, not the alleged hospital of record. Although the Health Department was obligated to provide him with a “Certificate of Live Birth” in 1961, via the administrative process mandated by HRS 338-17.8, his birth would not actually have to occur in the Hospital stated on the record in order for this record to be created. However, as provided by HRS 338-5, after baby Obama had been examined by an “attending” physician sometime between August 5th and August 8th at the hospital, the Department of Health was able to create the official record of birth after the doctor’s signed approval, containing the name of the hospital where the examination took place.
Essentially, the Hawaiian Department of Health does not issue an official birth certificate under the provision of HRS 338-17.8 until a board certified physician has examined the child in an official medical facility of record.
So, how was Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” assigned a larger number than his birth-mates?
As mentioned, Section 5-8 of the ‘Vital Statistics of the United States: Volume 1 – Natality” report states:
Sampling of Birth Records
The manner in which records are numbered greatly reduces the sampling variability of totals for geographic areas. Records are numbered in the primary state offices of vital statistics as they are received from the local offices. The assignment of the last digit in the number is not selective and systematic sampling of even-numbered records may be assumed to be unbiased. Furthermore, because the records are always in geographic order BEFORE numbering, twice the same count of births occurring in the great majority of counties is the same as the corresponding figure based on all records.
The key words are, "records are numbered in the primary state offices as they are received and are always in geographic order before numbering." Essentially, this means that Obama's birth registration, which was received by the main office before the Nordyke twins', was assigned a higher number because it was received by the main office in geographic order, not chronological order. Obama's birth was not registered in the same office as the Nordyke twins' birth.
This confirms that, in 1961, the main office of the Hawaiian Department of Health assigned registration numbers based on the order of reception of birth registrations from various local registration offices, not from the hospitals of the births. Therefore, if Obama’s birth registration was included with the Nordyke twins and other births occurring at Kapiolani in same HDOH birth registration office, we should expect the Nordyke's numbers to be assigned in order of reception at the same time as Obama's!!
However, since it is likely that Obama's birth was not registered in the same office as the Nordyke twins, who were actually born in Kapi’olani hospital, Obama’s birth registration was assigned a number based on its "geographic order", not its chronological order, of registration.
If Obama was actually born in Kapi’olani hospital on August 4th, 1961, why was his birth registered in a different geographic location as indicated by the non-sequential number, on August 8th, which would therefore trigger a registration number out of order with the Nordyke twins' birth of August 5th who were registered with all the other births in Kapi’olani?
DIFFERENT LOCAL REGISTRARS
Aside from the fact that Obama’s 'Certificate of Live Birth' Registration released by the Hawaiian Department of Health appears to be affixed with a signature which appears to play on the Hawaiian word, "UKULELE" (U.K.L. Lee), it is also represented by different local registrar than is shown on the Nordyke’s Hospital version of the Certificate of Live Birth. A different local registrar worked in each of the four branch offices in which births were registered in Hawaii. Obama's birth was registered in an office which is not the office use by Kapi’olani to register births occurring in its facility.
The name of a local registrar is not associated with other birth certificates for births which actually occurred at Kapi’olani and which were attested by physicians who actually delivered those births. This registrar worked in a branch office not used by Kapi’olani to register births. This is why Obama’s birth registration number is out of sequence with other births at the same time as his.
OUT OF ORDER TOO: THE NEWSPAPER ANNOUNCEMENTS
Last month, The Daily Pen’s Dan Crosby, published the results of his investigation of the procedures used to publish birth announcements in Hawaii. He found historical evidence which supports that fact that Obama’s birth did not occur in Kapi’olani, but which was registered in a different local office after he was examined by a doctor at Kapi’olani on August 7th, 1961.
Crosby went to Hawaii to research and investigate the cavalcade of ambiguous information related to Obama’s covert natal history including the origins and protocols used to publish the birth announcements in 1961. He focused on the manner in which the Hawaiian Department of Health and local hospitals coordinated vital statistics information and how the chain of information from the Hospital to the Hawaiian Department of Health resulted in “Weekly Health Bureau Statistics” announcements published in the local papers.
Crosby found evidence that the order in which the announcements were published was not random or chronological. In fact, he discovered they were published by the order of birth registration numbers assigned by the main Office of Vital Records which, in turn, were based on reception from various local registration branches. He discovered that, regardless of when the birth may have occurred, the registration number, assigned by the geographic order of the registration offices, determined the order of the announcements.
This is why Obama’s birth announcements occur near the bottom of each column in each newspaper even though there are births which occurred before and after his but which are published above his in the papers. This is because the births published above his all occurred in the same place and were registered in the same office and then passed to the central main office. The numbers were, therefore, ordered by the main office of the Health department in reference to their geographic registration order, not their chronological occurrence.
An investigation of the addresses of the birth registrations reveals that they migrate proximally to either a medical facility or to a local registration office. This is logical because most pregnant women would desire a hospital in close proximity once contractions began.
The birth announcements and ordering based on geographic registration location are shown below as they appear in the two versions of the newspapers.
Mr. and Mrs. Samuel K. Haas Sr. 849-A 11th Ave. 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Charles J. Staley 1319 Anapa St. 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Richard R. Kitson Apt. 11, 1635 Clark St. 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. George P. Ayau Sr. 87-143 Lillana St., Malll 7/31/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Thaddeus J. Raymond 1371 Haloa Drive 7/30/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Robert I. Arakawa 935-B Hausten St., 8/1/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Herbert Y. Takahashi 56 Nanea Ave, Wahiawa 8/2/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Allington K. Brown Maunawill Road, Kallua 8/2/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Cirillo V. Caperto 918 Puuhale Road 8/3/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Samuel L. M. Mokuahi Sr 732 Laukea St. 8/2/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Peter C. Kamealoha Jr. 441 McNeill St. 8/3/1961
Mr. and Mrs. John R. Clifford Sr. 2624 Maunawai Place 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Edward W. Walker 1660 S. King St., 8/7/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Wallace M. Durkin 3813 Radford Drive 8/7/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Mike M. Nagaishi 2687 Gardenia 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Glenn E. Earnest 1258 Wilhelmina Rise 8/6/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Edward S. H. Chun 45-440 Akimala St., Kaheohe 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. John R. Waidelich 937 18th Ave. 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Emmett P. Simpson 2752 Kahiti St. 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Melvin K. F. Liu 45-548 Keaahala Road, Kaheohe 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Richard D. Wright 91-939 Kalapu St., Ewa Beach, Ewa 8/5/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Andrew A. M. Hatchle 2420 Kaululaau St. 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs Harry Y.W. Wong 463 Lawelwe St. 8/4/1961
Mr. and Mrs. Ernesto Kim
Note that the announcements are in the exact same order in both papers. Also, notice Obama’s birth registration announcement nearer the bottom of the order in the last group while the birth dates appear to be grouped rather than ordered from the top of the column to the bottom. This indicates they are indeed grouped by geographic registration occurrence as they are received in batches from each branch location by the main Health Department office, as prescribed by the guidelines described in the NVSD report. Otherwise, the birth order would be published based on either alphabetical or chronological order, which they are not, as obviously shown here. This is an indication that Obama’s birth registration was received by the main office of the Hawaiian Department of Health from a location other than the office used to register births occurring in Kapi’olani.
Obama's announcement was published on August 12th and 13th of the editions of the Star and Sunday Advertiser in 1961. The Nordyke's announcement was publish the following week. Obama's announcement was published earlier than his alleged "birthmates" because his registration was among fewer which were processed as part of a batch of "walk-in" registrations from another local office. His record was processed faster and earlier and was able to be fit within the space provided by the newspaper for that batch of registration records that week. The larger overall quantity of registrations containing the Nordyke's records had to be carried over to the following week because their large batch required three more days to process and be allocated space in the papers.
Obama’s DOH “Certificate of Live Birth” Registration omits the “Amendment section” from its lower margin which is present on the hospital generated version and contains space available for amendments, dates of examinations and medical information. It is also used to show the signatures of the Director of Health and the Deputy Registrar. This is absent from Obama’s HDOH document because it was not generated by the hospital and this doctor was not present at his birth and did not preside over later amendments, such as Obama’s adoption by Lolo Soetoro.
CONCLUSIONS
Obama’s birth was not registered in the same Health Department office as the Nordyke twins and hundreds of other births occurring the week of July 30 – August 5th at Kapi’olani hospital. Birth numbering order was established by federal standards according to geography not chronological order of births, in order to maximize accuracy of natal statistics reporting over as wide as possible a registration area throughout the entire U.S. Chronological ordering alone presented a highly disproportionate risk of under-reported rural, non-hospital and non-resident births due to the U.S. Department of Health's 50%-reporting method based only on even-numbered certificates.
If state's reported only even-numbered births from all births in chronological order, and the walk-in registrations from a particular region all happened to fall on "odd-numbered" birth schedules, they would not be reported accurately for that region. This is why regional reporting was enacted over chronological reporting. However, regional reporting also created non-sequential numbering with respect to birth date and time.
The publication of Obama’s birth announcement near the bottom of the columns of the two newspapers, printed lower than announcements for births which occurred after his, indicates that his birth registration document was received and ordered in accordance with geographic location, not chronological order or alphabetic order. This, therefore, indicates that Obama's birth actually occurred in a location other than Kapi'olani hospital.
Dr. David Sinclair was not present during the delivery of Barack Obama. However, since he was the first physician to examine baby Obama and his mother at Kapi’olani on August 7th or 8th, he is legally bound to record his signature as the attending physician of record at that time. Per HRS 338, the naming of the hospital is subsequent to the naming of the doctor where the examination, not the birth, took place.
Since Dr. Sinclair was not the birthing physician, he could not officially attest to Obama’s birth weight, which is absent from the HDOH Certificate of Live Birth Registration.
The name of local registrar is different on Obama’s HDOH Certificate of Live Birth Registration because Obama’s birth was not registered in the same branch office of the Vital Statistics office as births occurring at Kapi’olani.
As testified by the 1961 Vital Statistics of the United States Report, Obama’s birth registration number is non-sequential with other births at the same time because it was assigned by the main office of the HDOH after it was received from one of multiple registration offices in Hawaii. The HDOH assigned Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth a registration number based on its geographic registration location, not chronological occurrence in a hospital.
Obama’s recently revealed Certificate of Live Birth was created and issued by the Hawaiian Department of Health through administrative procedures based on HRS 338 and Administrative Rules. It was not generated by any hospital and was only attested by an attending physician after an examination of the newborn Obama qualified the HDOH to issue an original birth certificate provided by HRS 338-17.8.
Therefore, the geographic location of Obama’s actual emergence from his mother’s womb remains a mystery.
Regardless, the identity of Obama’s foreign father is confirmed in this suspicious but newly released Certificate of Live Birth Registration, which disqualifies Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of the presidency even if he was shown by a hospital generated birth certificate to have been born in Hawaii.
Apparently, even a document forger can agree on that.
Sunday, May 1, 2011
Obama Supporter Unknowingly Confirms BC Forgery
OBAMA’S HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER CLAIMS DIFFERENT DOCTOR
by Miki Booth
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of the Post & Email.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/27/obama-supporter-unknowingly-confirms-bc-forgery/
Image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 purported to be a copy of Obama's long-form birth certificate
(Apr. 27, 2011, Tulsa, OK) —The putative president and his enablers have really gone over the line today, Wednesday April, 27, 2011. It just goes to show there is a culture of fear and desperation in the house at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. First off today, World Net Daily published a scathing expose of Hawai’i Dept. of Health and their “helter-skelter” handling of requests for long form birth certificates. They have been doing incredible documentary acrobatics changing policy and procedure to fit Obama’s claims. And if that wasn’t bad enough, Oklahoma votes today on SB 91 the presidential certification bill which is expected to pass by a large margin and signed into law by Gov. Mary Fallin. The bill will then automatically become law within 5 days.
The Obama Public Relations machine decided today was the crucial day to release the recently cooked up Certificate of Live Birth betting its unveiling will influence enough members of the Oklahoma House to have second thoughts about the necessity of such a bill.
The scramble was on when minions tasked to look for negative reporting on the internet discovered the WND story by Bob Unruh. More scrambling. Call the players to the war room, things are unraveling. But Trump has moved on. He’s not even talking about the birth certificate anymore, he’s bringing up the school records. What does he know about Occidental? Does he know about Columbia too? Has he talked to tea party leaders about all the violations of the Constitution? With the release today of the newly “cooked” copy of his birth record Obama has brought the wrath of every red-blooded American down on his head. His father was a British subject therefore Obama is not an Article II, Section I constitutionally eligible “natural born citizen.” He has illegally taken our government and surrounded himself with enemies of the Constitution and those cronies decided today was the day to release this particular red herring.
Why now? Why not last year when he could have kept an 18-year decorated Army flight surgeon from going to federal prison for asking to see the document that Obama now flaunts with seeming impunity. Terry Lakin is nearing completion of a 6-month prison term, leaving Leavenworth stripped of his 18-year career, dismissed from the Army and loss of all benefits. The most disgusting aspect of this travesty is the heartless punishment of putting him in prison three days before Christmas, away from his wife and three children. A clear message to anyone that would challenge Obama’s legitimacy.
The unraveling has begun. Today there are big changes in the Intelligence community. New players and musical chairs in the CIA. Create clutter, create confusion, backlog inquiries, and shake everything up to avoid evidence getting shook out.
Bernanke and Geithner are suspect financial manipulators who have done nothing but damage to the U.S. financial system and jealously guard what is actually in the Federal Reserve. Like Obama and his cronies they are unaccountable to the American people. Something big is coming down.
The birth certificate Obama is flaunting is an obvious fake to any of the millions of people who are on to the treacherous actions of Obama’s push to socialism.
It is indeed convenient that Dr. David A. Sinclair, who coincidentally was my OB/GYN who delivered my son, Alan, has passed therefore he cannot attest to the fact of obama’s birth. The forgery looks good on the surface but is fraught with problems. It appears to be manufactured using the Nordyke twin’s samples and they cannot get away with the higher chronological number belying an alleged earlier birth.
Coincidentally, my husband, Fred, was delivered in Kapiolani by the same doctor that delivered the Nordyke twins. It might have been too much fudging to claim the Nordyke’s doctor on the certificate revealed today but it doesn’t really matter since neither doctor delivered Obama according to supporter Barbara Nelson, Obama’s English teacher at Punahou High School and perhaps “the only person left who specifically remembers his birth.”
Nelson stated for The Buffalo News on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, “I may be the only person left who specifically remembers his birth. His parents are gone, his grandmother is gone, the obstetrician who delivered him is gone,” said Nelson, referring to Dr. Rodney T. West, who died in February at the age of 98. Here’s the story: Nelson was having dinner at the Outrigger Canoe Club on Waikiki Beach with Dr. West, the father of her college friend, Jo-Anne. Making conversation, Nelson turned to Dr. West and said: “‘So, tell me something interesting that happened this week,’” she recalls.
His response: “Well, today, Stanley had a baby. Now that’s something to write home about.”
The new mother was Stanley (later referred to by her middle name of Ann) Dunham, and the baby was Barack Hussein Obama.
OBAMA’S HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER CLAIMS DIFFERENT DOCTOR
by Miki Booth
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of the Post & Email.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/27/obama-supporter-unknowingly-confirms-bc-forgery/
Image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 purported to be a copy of Obama's long-form birth certificate
(Apr. 27, 2011, Tulsa, OK) —The putative president and his enablers have really gone over the line today, Wednesday April, 27, 2011. It just goes to show there is a culture of fear and desperation in the house at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. First off today, World Net Daily published a scathing expose of Hawai’i Dept. of Health and their “helter-skelter” handling of requests for long form birth certificates. They have been doing incredible documentary acrobatics changing policy and procedure to fit Obama’s claims. And if that wasn’t bad enough, Oklahoma votes today on SB 91 the presidential certification bill which is expected to pass by a large margin and signed into law by Gov. Mary Fallin. The bill will then automatically become law within 5 days.
The Obama Public Relations machine decided today was the crucial day to release the recently cooked up Certificate of Live Birth betting its unveiling will influence enough members of the Oklahoma House to have second thoughts about the necessity of such a bill.
The scramble was on when minions tasked to look for negative reporting on the internet discovered the WND story by Bob Unruh. More scrambling. Call the players to the war room, things are unraveling. But Trump has moved on. He’s not even talking about the birth certificate anymore, he’s bringing up the school records. What does he know about Occidental? Does he know about Columbia too? Has he talked to tea party leaders about all the violations of the Constitution? With the release today of the newly “cooked” copy of his birth record Obama has brought the wrath of every red-blooded American down on his head. His father was a British subject therefore Obama is not an Article II, Section I constitutionally eligible “natural born citizen.” He has illegally taken our government and surrounded himself with enemies of the Constitution and those cronies decided today was the day to release this particular red herring.
Why now? Why not last year when he could have kept an 18-year decorated Army flight surgeon from going to federal prison for asking to see the document that Obama now flaunts with seeming impunity. Terry Lakin is nearing completion of a 6-month prison term, leaving Leavenworth stripped of his 18-year career, dismissed from the Army and loss of all benefits. The most disgusting aspect of this travesty is the heartless punishment of putting him in prison three days before Christmas, away from his wife and three children. A clear message to anyone that would challenge Obama’s legitimacy.
The unraveling has begun. Today there are big changes in the Intelligence community. New players and musical chairs in the CIA. Create clutter, create confusion, backlog inquiries, and shake everything up to avoid evidence getting shook out.
Bernanke and Geithner are suspect financial manipulators who have done nothing but damage to the U.S. financial system and jealously guard what is actually in the Federal Reserve. Like Obama and his cronies they are unaccountable to the American people. Something big is coming down.
The birth certificate Obama is flaunting is an obvious fake to any of the millions of people who are on to the treacherous actions of Obama’s push to socialism.
It is indeed convenient that Dr. David A. Sinclair, who coincidentally was my OB/GYN who delivered my son, Alan, has passed therefore he cannot attest to the fact of obama’s birth. The forgery looks good on the surface but is fraught with problems. It appears to be manufactured using the Nordyke twin’s samples and they cannot get away with the higher chronological number belying an alleged earlier birth.
Coincidentally, my husband, Fred, was delivered in Kapiolani by the same doctor that delivered the Nordyke twins. It might have been too much fudging to claim the Nordyke’s doctor on the certificate revealed today but it doesn’t really matter since neither doctor delivered Obama according to supporter Barbara Nelson, Obama’s English teacher at Punahou High School and perhaps “the only person left who specifically remembers his birth.”
Nelson stated for The Buffalo News on Tuesday, February 17, 2009, “I may be the only person left who specifically remembers his birth. His parents are gone, his grandmother is gone, the obstetrician who delivered him is gone,” said Nelson, referring to Dr. Rodney T. West, who died in February at the age of 98. Here’s the story: Nelson was having dinner at the Outrigger Canoe Club on Waikiki Beach with Dr. West, the father of her college friend, Jo-Anne. Making conversation, Nelson turned to Dr. West and said: “‘So, tell me something interesting that happened this week,’” she recalls.
His response: “Well, today, Stanley had a baby. Now that’s something to write home about.”
The new mother was Stanley (later referred to by her middle name of Ann) Dunham, and the baby was Barack Hussein Obama.
Forgery, Fraud and Ineligibility
OBAMA HAS SHOWN THE WORLD THAT HE WAS NOT BORN TO A U.S. CITIZEN FATHER, SO WHY IS HE IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
by Neil Turner
Editor's Note: Used with permission of The Post & Email.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/30/forgery-fraud-and-ineligibility/
Swiss philosopher Emmerich de Vattel's "The Law of Nations" was published in 1758
(Apr. 30, 2011) — Obama has now personally and publicly acknowledged, albeit with the ‘silliness’ of an eight-year-old with a crayon and a piece of security paper*, that he is not a natural born Citizen – as defined by the Constitution:
1. Article II, Section 1:5 says that only a ‘natural born Citizen’ shall be eligible to the Office of President;
2. Article I, Section 8 says that Congress (under the authority granted by the People) shall have the power to… define and punish… Offenses against the Law of Nations;
3. The Law of Nations says that:
‘The natives, or natural born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens’;
‘As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights’;
‘The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children’;
‘To be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.’
Now that Congress has been made fully (and publicly) aware that an ineligible non-natural born Citizen is occupying the Office of President and Commander in Chief (they could not be so stupid as to not know – see ‘Something Stupid This Way Comes’), it becomes incumbent upon them to begin impeachment proceedings immediately, lest their failure to act previously – or especially now that they and the whole world knows – makes them chargeable with Misprision of Treason.
An article written by JB Williams, Managing Editor of www.PatriotsUnion.org, discusses this public confirmation by Obama that he is NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. Check the links at the end (you can contact your Senators and Representative directly without going through their website), and take the appropriate actions to help right this foundering ship of State and restore our Constitution.
*1. See Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth here.
2. Left click to draw a box around the text part of the Certificate. Right click mouse. Choose “Copy Image.”
3. Paste into any standard Word processing document. The fraud is now exposed to everyone with a computer and an internet connection.
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
OBAMA HAS SHOWN THE WORLD THAT HE WAS NOT BORN TO A U.S. CITIZEN FATHER, SO WHY IS HE IN THE WHITE HOUSE?
by Neil Turner
Editor's Note: Used with permission of The Post & Email.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/30/forgery-fraud-and-ineligibility/
Swiss philosopher Emmerich de Vattel's "The Law of Nations" was published in 1758
(Apr. 30, 2011) — Obama has now personally and publicly acknowledged, albeit with the ‘silliness’ of an eight-year-old with a crayon and a piece of security paper*, that he is not a natural born Citizen – as defined by the Constitution:
1. Article II, Section 1:5 says that only a ‘natural born Citizen’ shall be eligible to the Office of President;
2. Article I, Section 8 says that Congress (under the authority granted by the People) shall have the power to… define and punish… Offenses against the Law of Nations;
3. The Law of Nations says that:
‘The natives, or natural born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens’;
‘As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights’;
‘The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children’;
‘To be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.’
Now that Congress has been made fully (and publicly) aware that an ineligible non-natural born Citizen is occupying the Office of President and Commander in Chief (they could not be so stupid as to not know – see ‘Something Stupid This Way Comes’), it becomes incumbent upon them to begin impeachment proceedings immediately, lest their failure to act previously – or especially now that they and the whole world knows – makes them chargeable with Misprision of Treason.
An article written by JB Williams, Managing Editor of www.PatriotsUnion.org, discusses this public confirmation by Obama that he is NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. Check the links at the end (you can contact your Senators and Representative directly without going through their website), and take the appropriate actions to help right this foundering ship of State and restore our Constitution.
*1. See Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth here.
2. Left click to draw a box around the text part of the Certificate. Right click mouse. Choose “Copy Image.”
3. Paste into any standard Word processing document. The fraud is now exposed to everyone with a computer and an internet connection.
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
Guide to What is Wrong (So Far) with the Obama Long-Form Birth Certificate
ANALYSIS OF IMAGE POSTED ON THE WEB ON APRIL 27, 2011
by John F. Sweeney, ©2011
Editor's Note: Used with permission of The Post & Email.http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/30/guide-to-what-is-wrong-so-far-with-the-obama-long-form-birth-certificate/
On April 27, 2011, the White House and Obama proclaimed this a "certified copy" of his original long-form birth certificate from Hawaii. Many examiners are coming forward declaring it a blatant forgery.
(Apr. 30, 2011) — In March 2010, The Post & Email published Mr. Sweeney’s analysis of the Certification of Live Birth image posted on the internet in June 2008 purported to be Obama’s “birth certificate.” The form taken from the White House blog is shown in black and white rather than the green background with black letters originally released at The Daily KOS, followed by other websites such as Politifact and Factcheck.org.
Here Mr. Sweeney shares his findings regarding the image published by the White House on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 “long-form birth certificate” containing more detail than the first document. However, no paper document has been made available to the public, despite the appearance of a letter from Hawaii Department of Health Director Loretta J. Fuddy stating that two “certified” paper copies were provided to Obama’s attorney, Judith Corley, on Tuesday, April 26.
The White House blog echoed the talking points which Obama had mentioned in his press conference on Wednesday, insisting that the short-form document issued in 2008 “is the birth certificate.” Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer described Obama’s failure to release his long-form birth certificate as a “fake issue.”
The alleged long-form birth certificate can be found at the White House blog here.
Mr. Sweeney’s work follows.
Layers
The released document contains multiple images within the PDF file. Using various Adobe products these layers are simple to detect. Using Adobe Standard Version 9 the layers can be broken out by going to a) Advanced b) Document Processing c) Export All Images. When this is done 3 jpg images will be created. It appears the creators did not ‘flatten’ the image before posting it. The ‘flattened’ image would have no layers.
A true scan creates a single image and single ‘layer’. There would be no reason that the process would automatically break apart the image into chucks. Especially into the elements that are present. There are claims of this being from an Optical Character Recognition (OCR) process at the time of the scan. These are beyond ridicules. First – why would it be processed via OCR? There was no need or reason to? Second, OCR would not ‘break apart’ the images like this. OCR looks through an image looking for possible characters that map to ASCII characters and they attempts to convert them. But it does this one character at a time for the overall document.
Image problems
At least three major elements show up that are obvious red flags:
1) The bend in the certificate image on the left side. Any certified copy of a Hawaii LFBC created recently does not have this ‘left side bend’. This phenomena seems to from when certified copies where made from actual photos of an actual document. Modern creations show this image as very flat oriented. Likely because they are stored in a digital document library and were scanned on flatbed scanner individually. The Nordyke Twins (born the day after Obama) certified copies are well known. These certified copies are well known. These DO have the left side bend in them. Certified copies made in the 2000s – do not.
2) The X’s in the boxes on 2 of the lines in the Obama LFBC are completely misaligned from the rest of the type on the same line. No other LFBC certified copies show these phenomena. None. The known authentic LFBCs show the X lined up with the text on the same line – as you expect when someone uses a manual typewriter.
3) The centered vs. left tab alignment. The Obama LFBC has text centered in the form fields. But comparison to known real images of LFBCs from that period clearly show that mechanical typewriter was used and aligned the text via mechanical tabs. The Obama form is the only one known to show centered text – an all but impossible feat to do with mechanical typewriters in 1961.
There are other signs of forgery but these are the ones that are easy explain to people who are not graphics designers and do not deal with digital images every day.
1) The Layers
Registrar Alvin T. Onaka's Stamp
2) The Left Bend
The Out-of-Alignment X’s
The Centered Fields vs. Typewriter Tabs
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
ANALYSIS OF IMAGE POSTED ON THE WEB ON APRIL 27, 2011
by John F. Sweeney, ©2011
Editor's Note: Used with permission of The Post & Email.http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/30/guide-to-what-is-wrong-so-far-with-the-obama-long-form-birth-certificate/
On April 27, 2011, the White House and Obama proclaimed this a "certified copy" of his original long-form birth certificate from Hawaii. Many examiners are coming forward declaring it a blatant forgery.
(Apr. 30, 2011) — In March 2010, The Post & Email published Mr. Sweeney’s analysis of the Certification of Live Birth image posted on the internet in June 2008 purported to be Obama’s “birth certificate.” The form taken from the White House blog is shown in black and white rather than the green background with black letters originally released at The Daily KOS, followed by other websites such as Politifact and Factcheck.org.
Here Mr. Sweeney shares his findings regarding the image published by the White House on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 “long-form birth certificate” containing more detail than the first document. However, no paper document has been made available to the public, despite the appearance of a letter from Hawaii Department of Health Director Loretta J. Fuddy stating that two “certified” paper copies were provided to Obama’s attorney, Judith Corley, on Tuesday, April 26.
The White House blog echoed the talking points which Obama had mentioned in his press conference on Wednesday, insisting that the short-form document issued in 2008 “is the birth certificate.” Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer described Obama’s failure to release his long-form birth certificate as a “fake issue.”
The alleged long-form birth certificate can be found at the White House blog here.
Mr. Sweeney’s work follows.
Layers
The released document contains multiple images within the PDF file. Using various Adobe products these layers are simple to detect. Using Adobe Standard Version 9 the layers can be broken out by going to a) Advanced b) Document Processing c) Export All Images. When this is done 3 jpg images will be created. It appears the creators did not ‘flatten’ the image before posting it. The ‘flattened’ image would have no layers.
A true scan creates a single image and single ‘layer’. There would be no reason that the process would automatically break apart the image into chucks. Especially into the elements that are present. There are claims of this being from an Optical Character Recognition (OCR) process at the time of the scan. These are beyond ridicules. First – why would it be processed via OCR? There was no need or reason to? Second, OCR would not ‘break apart’ the images like this. OCR looks through an image looking for possible characters that map to ASCII characters and they attempts to convert them. But it does this one character at a time for the overall document.
Image problems
At least three major elements show up that are obvious red flags:
1) The bend in the certificate image on the left side. Any certified copy of a Hawaii LFBC created recently does not have this ‘left side bend’. This phenomena seems to from when certified copies where made from actual photos of an actual document. Modern creations show this image as very flat oriented. Likely because they are stored in a digital document library and were scanned on flatbed scanner individually. The Nordyke Twins (born the day after Obama) certified copies are well known. These certified copies are well known. These DO have the left side bend in them. Certified copies made in the 2000s – do not.
2) The X’s in the boxes on 2 of the lines in the Obama LFBC are completely misaligned from the rest of the type on the same line. No other LFBC certified copies show these phenomena. None. The known authentic LFBCs show the X lined up with the text on the same line – as you expect when someone uses a manual typewriter.
3) The centered vs. left tab alignment. The Obama LFBC has text centered in the form fields. But comparison to known real images of LFBCs from that period clearly show that mechanical typewriter was used and aligned the text via mechanical tabs. The Obama form is the only one known to show centered text – an all but impossible feat to do with mechanical typewriters in 1961.
There are other signs of forgery but these are the ones that are easy explain to people who are not graphics designers and do not deal with digital images every day.
1) The Layers
Registrar Alvin T. Onaka's Stamp
2) The Left Bend
The Out-of-Alignment X’s
The Centered Fields vs. Typewriter Tabs
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)