Obama’s Ineligibility, Elective Despotism and the Vote of Slaves
WITH A DEAD CONSTITUTION, IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO WINS THE PRESIDENCY IN 2012
by Lawrence Sellin, ©2012
Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.
Is this document dead?
(Jan. 12, 2012) — If re-elected, Barack Obama will kill the United States quickly. Any one of the leading Republican candidates will simply do it more slowly.
The erosion of the Constitution and our Constitutional rights has been happening quietly for a long time. With the election of Obama in 2008, corrupt politicians, their operatives and the mainstream media just decided not to bother hiding that fact anymore.
Corrupt American politicians, the operational arm of the multinational, wealthy and networked elite, preserve the illusion of democracy for the now disenfranchised voters, while journalists, falsely proclaiming themselves as tireless defenders of liberty, then distort the news in an attempt to manipulate public opinion.
The arrogance of Washington, D.C. has not abated, but has only gotten more brazen since 1993, when Lewis H. Lapham (“A Wish for Kings”) wrote:
“The politicians dress up the deals in the language of law or policy, but they’re in the business of brokering the tax revenue, and what keeps them in office is not their talent for oratory but their skill at redistributing the national income in a way that rewards their clients, patrons, friends and campaign contributors.”
Our politicians see every election as a license to steal from ordinary, hard-working Americans, permission to flout the law and avoid all accountability for destroying the country for the benefit of a few.
We no longer have representatives of the people, but elected despots who consider elections as mere formalities and citizens as their slaves.
By all measures, both the Republican and Democratic Parties are asking voters again to endorse the corrupt status quo.
In 2008, both parties permitted the election of Obama, a Constitutionally illegal President, who has forged his birth documents and his Selective Service registration. He has committed identity theft by using a Social Security Number not issued to him.
Questions about Obama ineligibility and his crimes have been intentionally suppressed by the political establishment and the media because the truth about Obama would so outrage the American people that the entire corrupt political system and its servants in the mainstream media would collapse.
Perhaps it is time to let it do so, by declaring Obama unconstitutional and boycotting Republican candidates, until such time when they openly address the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people and the greatest Constitutional crisis since the Civil War.
It is those corrupt politicians and a compliant media who have eroded our Constitution, stripped us of our Constitutional rights and destroyed the Founders model of a government of the people, by the people and for the people.
When will Congress launch an investigation into the criminal and usurper in the Oval Office? When will senior members of the military or the federal law enforcement agencies stand by their oaths to support and defend the Constitution?
The answer is “never.” There has been a colossal failure of leadership. We have a government littered with careerists, sycophants, cowards, liars and the greedy.
Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin stated:
“We are the heirs of those who froze with Washington at Valley Forge and who held the line at Gettysburg, who freed the slaves to close a shameful chapter, and who carved a nation out of the wilderness. We are the sons and daughters of those who stormed the beaches of Normandy and raised the flag at Iwo Jima and made America the strongest, the most prosperous, the greatest nation on earth forever in mankind’s history – the greatest, most exceptional nation.”
We owe it to those American heroes and to our posterity to fight the evil now permeating our government and society. We must not fail. Our country’s survival is in the balance.
Obama is not a natural born citizen, that is, a US citizen at birth, born of two US citizen parents at the time of his birth. He has never been eligible for the office of President.
The 2012 election will be a turning point in American history because our Constitution is in the balance. Let the politicians again ignore the Constitution and it is the end of our republic.
Patriots must speak out, oppose the corrupt political establishment and remove Obama from the state ballots.
There will be no second chance to take our country back.
———————————————————-
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com
Friday, January 13, 2012
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
A Discussion of Historical and Contemporary Meanings of “natural born Citizen”
HAS A “RECONCEPTUALIZATION” OCCURRED?
by Rule of Law
Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.
Do the definitions in Black's Law Dictionary agree with those in the U.S. Constitution?
(Jan. 11, 2012) — Editor’s Note: On January 10, 2012, The Post & Email published an article about a ballot challenge dismissed in the state of Alabama on January 9 in which we said of Bradley Davidson, the Executive Director of the Alabama Democrat Party, “He stated that his understanding was that in order to be considered ‘natural born,’ one must be born on American soil or U.S. territory.” In response, a reader wrote:
I have finally figured out where this is coming from and it explains a lot of the hostility found in the courts against citizen voters and their concern with Constitutional Eligibility. It is the understanding of the definition of “natural born citizen” itself and the document that controls that definition.
Black’s Law Dictionary is considered secondary only to U.S. Supreme Court rulings as a legal source. It was first published in the 19th century and is in its Ninth Edition. However, in 1991, the Fifth Edition, the definition for natural born citizens was stated as follows:
Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., 1991, p.1026)
http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm Section 4.1.
Native. A nature-born subject or citizen; a denizen by birth; one who owes his domicile or citizenship to the fact of his birth within the country referred to. The term may also include one born abroad, if his parents were citizens of the country, and not permanently residing in foreign parts. U. S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649, 18 S.Ct. 456, 42 L.Ed. 890; New Hartford v. Canaan, 54 Conn. 39, 5 A. 360; Oken v. Johnson, 160 Minn. 217, 199 N.W. 910.
The word “native,” as used in Alien Enemy Act, refers to a person’s place of birth, so that a person remains a native of country of birth, though he has moved away therefrom. United States ex rel. D’Esquiva v. Uhi, C.C.A. N. Y. 137 F.2d. 903, 905.
One who was born in Germany and later becomes a citizen of France was a “native” of Germany. Ex parte Gregoire, D.C.Cal., 61 F.Supp. 92, 93.
But a person born in Alsace which at the time of his birth was a part of Germany but was restored to France by the Treaty of Versailles of 1919 was a “native” of France. United States ex rel. Umecker v. McCoy, D.C.N.D., 54 F.Supp. 679, 681, 682.
Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition (1951) page 1176.
This is the controlling definition being protected by the judicial system. It is not grounded in the Constitution but in British Common law. It is not grounded in the U.S. Constitution but in a misinterpreted U.S. Supreme Court case written by a justice appointed by then-President Chester Arthur. This is the definition of a natural born subject, not a natural born citizen as understood by the wording of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5.
And yet in another law dictionary:
Native, native citizen. A natural-born subject. 1 Bla. Com 366. Those born in a country, of parents of who are citizens. Morse, Citizenship 12. See Citizen. There is no distinction between native born as used in the French Extradition treaty and natural born as used in the extradition act; 37 W. R. 269.
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Third Revision (8th Edition)(1914), Volume 2, page 2297.
It would seem that the definition of “natural born citizen” has changed over the years, and yet the basic assumed understanding of the definition in the context of the Constitutional eligibility criteria for “natural born citizen” remains constant: a natural born citizen is a person born on U.S. soil to U.S.-citizen parents.
An article published by the Yale Law School written by Rebekka Susan Bonner (2008) acknowledges a near-universal acceptance of the assertion that all persons born within the United States are natural born (Bonner, p. 3).
It goes on to state that there is a concerted effort by lawyers and politicians to change the self-defining concept of “natural born citizen” in favor of a “new interpretative approach that would expand the number of American citizens who may be considered natural born for purposes of presidential eligibility; how Congress might operationalize these new understandings and why reconceptualization of the meaning of the citizen clause is preferable to previous interpretations of Article II.” (Bonner, Abstract).
The bottom line is that the majority of lawyers, politicians, and judges practicing in this country have subverted the definition of “natural born citizen” found in Minor v. Happersett with the definition for a British natural born subject and have chosen U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark to set the definition. It is clear that these two U.S. Supreme Court rulings are in conflict with one another and the definition of “natural born citizen” is yet to finalized.
Any lawsuit going forward needs to consider this and address it head-on by declaring the sitting judge a hostile participant to the hearing biased in favor of British common law instead of the U.S. Constitution.
It isn’t race. It is a profound and fundamental misunderstanding of what Black’s Law Dictionary is. It is a collection of British Common laws and not based on the U.S. Constitution. It works in the U.S. because many of the legal terms used today in the practice of law are the same whether utilized in English Common law or U.S. law.
What I would like to know is why someone felt the need to put this definition in Black’s Law Dictionary in 1991? In the second printing, there is a clear distinction between “subject” and “citizen.”
This is why the lawsuits are being dismissed for either lack of jurisdiction or lack of standing without hearings on the merits. The definition which the American people understand for the term “natural born citizen” based on its context in the U.S. Constitution is not the same definition under which the judicial system and lawyers are operating. The disconnect could not be more profound. Furthermore, this new definition has been implemented without the consent of the governed.
HAS A “RECONCEPTUALIZATION” OCCURRED?
by Rule of Law
Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.
Do the definitions in Black's Law Dictionary agree with those in the U.S. Constitution?
(Jan. 11, 2012) — Editor’s Note: On January 10, 2012, The Post & Email published an article about a ballot challenge dismissed in the state of Alabama on January 9 in which we said of Bradley Davidson, the Executive Director of the Alabama Democrat Party, “He stated that his understanding was that in order to be considered ‘natural born,’ one must be born on American soil or U.S. territory.” In response, a reader wrote:
I have finally figured out where this is coming from and it explains a lot of the hostility found in the courts against citizen voters and their concern with Constitutional Eligibility. It is the understanding of the definition of “natural born citizen” itself and the document that controls that definition.
Black’s Law Dictionary is considered secondary only to U.S. Supreme Court rulings as a legal source. It was first published in the 19th century and is in its Ninth Edition. However, in 1991, the Fifth Edition, the definition for natural born citizens was stated as follows:
Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., 1991, p.1026)
http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm Section 4.1.
Native. A nature-born subject or citizen; a denizen by birth; one who owes his domicile or citizenship to the fact of his birth within the country referred to. The term may also include one born abroad, if his parents were citizens of the country, and not permanently residing in foreign parts. U. S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649, 18 S.Ct. 456, 42 L.Ed. 890; New Hartford v. Canaan, 54 Conn. 39, 5 A. 360; Oken v. Johnson, 160 Minn. 217, 199 N.W. 910.
The word “native,” as used in Alien Enemy Act, refers to a person’s place of birth, so that a person remains a native of country of birth, though he has moved away therefrom. United States ex rel. D’Esquiva v. Uhi, C.C.A. N. Y. 137 F.2d. 903, 905.
One who was born in Germany and later becomes a citizen of France was a “native” of Germany. Ex parte Gregoire, D.C.Cal., 61 F.Supp. 92, 93.
But a person born in Alsace which at the time of his birth was a part of Germany but was restored to France by the Treaty of Versailles of 1919 was a “native” of France. United States ex rel. Umecker v. McCoy, D.C.N.D., 54 F.Supp. 679, 681, 682.
Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition (1951) page 1176.
This is the controlling definition being protected by the judicial system. It is not grounded in the Constitution but in British Common law. It is not grounded in the U.S. Constitution but in a misinterpreted U.S. Supreme Court case written by a justice appointed by then-President Chester Arthur. This is the definition of a natural born subject, not a natural born citizen as understood by the wording of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5.
And yet in another law dictionary:
Native, native citizen. A natural-born subject. 1 Bla. Com 366. Those born in a country, of parents of who are citizens. Morse, Citizenship 12. See Citizen. There is no distinction between native born as used in the French Extradition treaty and natural born as used in the extradition act; 37 W. R. 269.
Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Third Revision (8th Edition)(1914), Volume 2, page 2297.
It would seem that the definition of “natural born citizen” has changed over the years, and yet the basic assumed understanding of the definition in the context of the Constitutional eligibility criteria for “natural born citizen” remains constant: a natural born citizen is a person born on U.S. soil to U.S.-citizen parents.
An article published by the Yale Law School written by Rebekka Susan Bonner (2008) acknowledges a near-universal acceptance of the assertion that all persons born within the United States are natural born (Bonner, p. 3).
It goes on to state that there is a concerted effort by lawyers and politicians to change the self-defining concept of “natural born citizen” in favor of a “new interpretative approach that would expand the number of American citizens who may be considered natural born for purposes of presidential eligibility; how Congress might operationalize these new understandings and why reconceptualization of the meaning of the citizen clause is preferable to previous interpretations of Article II.” (Bonner, Abstract).
The bottom line is that the majority of lawyers, politicians, and judges practicing in this country have subverted the definition of “natural born citizen” found in Minor v. Happersett with the definition for a British natural born subject and have chosen U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark to set the definition. It is clear that these two U.S. Supreme Court rulings are in conflict with one another and the definition of “natural born citizen” is yet to finalized.
Any lawsuit going forward needs to consider this and address it head-on by declaring the sitting judge a hostile participant to the hearing biased in favor of British common law instead of the U.S. Constitution.
It isn’t race. It is a profound and fundamental misunderstanding of what Black’s Law Dictionary is. It is a collection of British Common laws and not based on the U.S. Constitution. It works in the U.S. because many of the legal terms used today in the practice of law are the same whether utilized in English Common law or U.S. law.
What I would like to know is why someone felt the need to put this definition in Black’s Law Dictionary in 1991? In the second printing, there is a clear distinction between “subject” and “citizen.”
This is why the lawsuits are being dismissed for either lack of jurisdiction or lack of standing without hearings on the merits. The definition which the American people understand for the term “natural born citizen” based on its context in the U.S. Constitution is not the same definition under which the judicial system and lawyers are operating. The disconnect could not be more profound. Furthermore, this new definition has been implemented without the consent of the governed.
Sunday, January 1, 2012
New Hampshire House of Representatives Members to Hold Press Conference on Obama’s Eligibility on January 3
“WE NEED TO INFORM THE PUBLIC”
by Sharon Rondeau
Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.
New Hampshire produced the first state constitution on January 5, 1776, prior to the American Revolution
(Jan. 1, 2012) — On January 3, 2012, several members of the New Hampshire House of Representatives will hold a press conference with the primary purpose of informing New Hampshire citizens and registered voters that Barack Hussein Obama may not be eligible to serve as president and therefore should not have his name appear on the 2012 presidential ballot.
The time and place are tentatively set for 10:00 a.m. outside of the Legislative Office Building in Concord.
The website of the New Hampshire House of Representatives provides the following history regarding its beginnings:
Although threatened with reprisals from the British Crown and a bitterly divided constituency, New Hampshire’s leaders set the course for self-government in January 1776. Determined to keep the government close to the people, our forefathers fixed the size of the House of Representatives as a direct ratio to the state’s population. The first House consisted of 87 members, each one representing 100 families. As time passed and the population increased, the number of Representatives grew, until there were 443. In 1942, a constitutional amendment limited the size of the House to 400 but not less than 375 members. As a result, the New Hampshire House is the largest state legislative body in the United States.
New Hampshire has the largest House of Representatives in the nation. The Concord Monitor has stated that New Hampshire has “the most localized representation of any state in the country.”
On November 15, 2011, Atty. Orly Taitz filed a complaint with the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission regarding the placing of Obama’s name on the state ballot, citing his use of a social security number not assigned to him as well as having presented two forged birth certificates as proof that he was born in Hawaii. Several state representatives joined the complaint, and citizens from around the country filed challenges as well. A U.S. Army reserve retired colonel has launched a campaign to prevent Obama’s name from being included on the New Hampshire ballot.
The New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission responded to Taitz by holding a hearing on November 18, during which Taitz presented her case challenging Obama’s constitutional eligibility, focusing on the crimes which she alleged he committed.
Although the New Hampshire Secretary of State’s office has disallowed candidates from running for the presidency due to foreign birthplaces in the recent past, the decision of the Ballot Law Commission was that because Obama completed the application and paid the requisite $1,000 fee, it could not prevent his name from appearing on the 2012 ballot.
Atty. Taitz has since stated that “massive election fraud” is occurring in New Hampshire because it appears that in 2008, boxes of ballots were left out on tables rather than locked in a vault, which Gardner admitted in a video to be a deviation from standard protocol.
Nine members of the New Hampshire House attended the hearing of the Ballot Law Commission, one of whom was Rep. Laurence Rappaport (R-Coos). Rappaport stated that there were nine representatives present at the Ballot Law Commission hearing and that some or all of them organized the press conference to be held on Tuesday, January 3, 2012.
We first asked him about his reaction to the outcome of the Ballot Law Commission hearing, he responded, “I was extremely disappointed.”
We then asked him about the investigation called for by Attorney General Michael Delaney regarding alleged misconduct on the part of some of the representatives at the Ballot Law Commission hearing. Rappaport’s response was, “There were two investigations. One was by the House Security, run by Randy Joyner, and he reported to the Speaker of the House, and the Attorney General asked the State Police to investigate. Neither one of them contacted me, probably because although I was there, I never said anything. The results of the investigation, as I understand it, were that there were no threats made, and it was basically a non-event.”
Rappaport said that at the time we spoke with him on December 31, a statement to be made at the press conference was in second-draft format. Working on the statement with him are Reps. Lou and Carol Vita and Harry Accornero.
“What we really need to do is emphasize that Barack Obama was not eligible and is not eligible to become president. At the Ballot Law hearing, the Commission and the Assistant Secretary of State said publicly, under oath, on the record, that their authority was only to see that the paperwork was properly filled out and that the $1,000 fee was paid. If you go back a little farther, you find out that they had disqualified a man named Sal Mohamed and another named Abdul Hassan. There are letters, of which we have copies, signed by Karen Ladd, the Assistant Secretary of State. So we applied for a rehearing, which was denied, and we applied to the New Hampshire Supreme Court, and last week they denied us a hearing. We can provide complete copies of all of these challenges.”
The Post & Email asked, “Were you surprised that your own state Supreme Court refused to hear your appeal?” and Rappaport responded, “Yes, I was surprised.” He stated that in the letter he received, having been one of the plaintiffs, no reason had been provided.
Rappaort described the purpose of the press conference:
Our biggest concern is that the public becomes aware of what’s going on. We think that the public does not understand, and it is our effort to try to enlighten them. I would cite three things: First of all, there was Emmerich de Vattel’s Law of Nations, which gave the definition at the time of the Founders. Second, there was the case Minor v. Happersett from 1875, which established the definition of “natural born Citizen” as one who has two American-citizen parents. We have tons of evidence that Obama’s alleged father was not a citizen. He never held a green card and was never a resident alien. In fact, the truth is he was thrown out of the country.
Rappaport also cited Senate Resolution 511, passed in April 2008, which declared that John McCain was a natural born Citizen by virtue of having two U.S.-citizen parents, but that Obama was not held to the same standard, and he “didn’t know why.”
The Post & Email asked Rappaport, “Do you think that most of your constituents support what you are doing?” and he responded, “Yes. Obama is definitely not very popular in northern New Hampshire.” He stated that Coos County is the largest land mass in the state, has only about 30,000 residents, and was the reason he moved there. New Hampshire has a total of about 1,300,000 residents.
As to his reason for questioning Obama’s eligibility, Rappaport said, “We all swore an oath to two constitutions: the state constitution and the U.S. Constitution. I take my oath very seriously, and I feel that I’m required by that oath to do this. I feel very strongly about that. I’ve received a death threat on this go-around and a lot of letters from people who disagree with me. I’ve been called names, but I’ve never gotten a reasoned explanation, not one. I feel as if everyone is claiming ‘This is a settled matter, but I haven’t heard that.’”
We then asked him, “Do you believe the April 27, 2011 purported birth certificate being released to the public is what they’re considering the point which ‘settled’ it?” and he responded, “It didn’t come from him specifically; it came from the ‘White House.’ It is my opinion that not only is it a forgery, but it is a lousy forgery. I printed it from the White House website, and I was able to take it apart using Adobe Illustrator. There were something like 12 different layers. Through a process called ‘flattening,’ which puts all the layers together such that they can’t be separated, the layers should have been flattened, although a document expert could have still determined that it was a forgery.”
Rappaport stated that his background was in electrical engineering and that he “wrote computer software.” He said his skills include laying out a website, although he sometimes “hired other people” to do things beyond his skill level and is not a computer “expert.” Other New Hampshire representatives also have stated that they believe the image is a forgery.
The press conference is expected to last about 30 minutes, and New Hampshire media will be notified. “There’s no guarantee that any major media will cover it, but my biggest hope is that major media is finally waking up. When I was growing up, I read The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. Back then, The Times, in particular, was a really good newspaper. What you read on the front page was news, and what you read on the Editorial page was opinion, and the two were not mixed. Today, the news is highly biased. I feel as if The New York Times and The Washington Post report on a story only if it’s something they agree with. If it’s something they don’t agree with, it doesn’t appear anywhere. If it’s something that they mostly agree with, then you’ll find it on page 40.”
Rappaport is 71 and serving his second term in the New Hampshire House. He stated that the organizers of the press conference would have preferred to have more time to plan, but the New Hampshire primary is fast approaching on January 10 and they want to inform the people of what they believe has transpired. The group will also invite the attorney general and all New Hampshire representatives. “My plan is to put out an announcement to all representatives inviting them to support us and to come,” he said.
Final details of the time and place will be released shortly.
“WE NEED TO INFORM THE PUBLIC”
by Sharon Rondeau
Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.
New Hampshire produced the first state constitution on January 5, 1776, prior to the American Revolution
(Jan. 1, 2012) — On January 3, 2012, several members of the New Hampshire House of Representatives will hold a press conference with the primary purpose of informing New Hampshire citizens and registered voters that Barack Hussein Obama may not be eligible to serve as president and therefore should not have his name appear on the 2012 presidential ballot.
The time and place are tentatively set for 10:00 a.m. outside of the Legislative Office Building in Concord.
The website of the New Hampshire House of Representatives provides the following history regarding its beginnings:
Although threatened with reprisals from the British Crown and a bitterly divided constituency, New Hampshire’s leaders set the course for self-government in January 1776. Determined to keep the government close to the people, our forefathers fixed the size of the House of Representatives as a direct ratio to the state’s population. The first House consisted of 87 members, each one representing 100 families. As time passed and the population increased, the number of Representatives grew, until there were 443. In 1942, a constitutional amendment limited the size of the House to 400 but not less than 375 members. As a result, the New Hampshire House is the largest state legislative body in the United States.
New Hampshire has the largest House of Representatives in the nation. The Concord Monitor has stated that New Hampshire has “the most localized representation of any state in the country.”
On November 15, 2011, Atty. Orly Taitz filed a complaint with the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission regarding the placing of Obama’s name on the state ballot, citing his use of a social security number not assigned to him as well as having presented two forged birth certificates as proof that he was born in Hawaii. Several state representatives joined the complaint, and citizens from around the country filed challenges as well. A U.S. Army reserve retired colonel has launched a campaign to prevent Obama’s name from being included on the New Hampshire ballot.
The New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission responded to Taitz by holding a hearing on November 18, during which Taitz presented her case challenging Obama’s constitutional eligibility, focusing on the crimes which she alleged he committed.
Although the New Hampshire Secretary of State’s office has disallowed candidates from running for the presidency due to foreign birthplaces in the recent past, the decision of the Ballot Law Commission was that because Obama completed the application and paid the requisite $1,000 fee, it could not prevent his name from appearing on the 2012 ballot.
Atty. Taitz has since stated that “massive election fraud” is occurring in New Hampshire because it appears that in 2008, boxes of ballots were left out on tables rather than locked in a vault, which Gardner admitted in a video to be a deviation from standard protocol.
Nine members of the New Hampshire House attended the hearing of the Ballot Law Commission, one of whom was Rep. Laurence Rappaport (R-Coos). Rappaport stated that there were nine representatives present at the Ballot Law Commission hearing and that some or all of them organized the press conference to be held on Tuesday, January 3, 2012.
We first asked him about his reaction to the outcome of the Ballot Law Commission hearing, he responded, “I was extremely disappointed.”
We then asked him about the investigation called for by Attorney General Michael Delaney regarding alleged misconduct on the part of some of the representatives at the Ballot Law Commission hearing. Rappaport’s response was, “There were two investigations. One was by the House Security, run by Randy Joyner, and he reported to the Speaker of the House, and the Attorney General asked the State Police to investigate. Neither one of them contacted me, probably because although I was there, I never said anything. The results of the investigation, as I understand it, were that there were no threats made, and it was basically a non-event.”
Rappaport said that at the time we spoke with him on December 31, a statement to be made at the press conference was in second-draft format. Working on the statement with him are Reps. Lou and Carol Vita and Harry Accornero.
“What we really need to do is emphasize that Barack Obama was not eligible and is not eligible to become president. At the Ballot Law hearing, the Commission and the Assistant Secretary of State said publicly, under oath, on the record, that their authority was only to see that the paperwork was properly filled out and that the $1,000 fee was paid. If you go back a little farther, you find out that they had disqualified a man named Sal Mohamed and another named Abdul Hassan. There are letters, of which we have copies, signed by Karen Ladd, the Assistant Secretary of State. So we applied for a rehearing, which was denied, and we applied to the New Hampshire Supreme Court, and last week they denied us a hearing. We can provide complete copies of all of these challenges.”
The Post & Email asked, “Were you surprised that your own state Supreme Court refused to hear your appeal?” and Rappaport responded, “Yes, I was surprised.” He stated that in the letter he received, having been one of the plaintiffs, no reason had been provided.
Rappaort described the purpose of the press conference:
Our biggest concern is that the public becomes aware of what’s going on. We think that the public does not understand, and it is our effort to try to enlighten them. I would cite three things: First of all, there was Emmerich de Vattel’s Law of Nations, which gave the definition at the time of the Founders. Second, there was the case Minor v. Happersett from 1875, which established the definition of “natural born Citizen” as one who has two American-citizen parents. We have tons of evidence that Obama’s alleged father was not a citizen. He never held a green card and was never a resident alien. In fact, the truth is he was thrown out of the country.
Rappaport also cited Senate Resolution 511, passed in April 2008, which declared that John McCain was a natural born Citizen by virtue of having two U.S.-citizen parents, but that Obama was not held to the same standard, and he “didn’t know why.”
The Post & Email asked Rappaport, “Do you think that most of your constituents support what you are doing?” and he responded, “Yes. Obama is definitely not very popular in northern New Hampshire.” He stated that Coos County is the largest land mass in the state, has only about 30,000 residents, and was the reason he moved there. New Hampshire has a total of about 1,300,000 residents.
As to his reason for questioning Obama’s eligibility, Rappaport said, “We all swore an oath to two constitutions: the state constitution and the U.S. Constitution. I take my oath very seriously, and I feel that I’m required by that oath to do this. I feel very strongly about that. I’ve received a death threat on this go-around and a lot of letters from people who disagree with me. I’ve been called names, but I’ve never gotten a reasoned explanation, not one. I feel as if everyone is claiming ‘This is a settled matter, but I haven’t heard that.’”
We then asked him, “Do you believe the April 27, 2011 purported birth certificate being released to the public is what they’re considering the point which ‘settled’ it?” and he responded, “It didn’t come from him specifically; it came from the ‘White House.’ It is my opinion that not only is it a forgery, but it is a lousy forgery. I printed it from the White House website, and I was able to take it apart using Adobe Illustrator. There were something like 12 different layers. Through a process called ‘flattening,’ which puts all the layers together such that they can’t be separated, the layers should have been flattened, although a document expert could have still determined that it was a forgery.”
Rappaport stated that his background was in electrical engineering and that he “wrote computer software.” He said his skills include laying out a website, although he sometimes “hired other people” to do things beyond his skill level and is not a computer “expert.” Other New Hampshire representatives also have stated that they believe the image is a forgery.
The press conference is expected to last about 30 minutes, and New Hampshire media will be notified. “There’s no guarantee that any major media will cover it, but my biggest hope is that major media is finally waking up. When I was growing up, I read The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. Back then, The Times, in particular, was a really good newspaper. What you read on the front page was news, and what you read on the Editorial page was opinion, and the two were not mixed. Today, the news is highly biased. I feel as if The New York Times and The Washington Post report on a story only if it’s something they agree with. If it’s something they don’t agree with, it doesn’t appear anywhere. If it’s something that they mostly agree with, then you’ll find it on page 40.”
Rappaport is 71 and serving his second term in the New Hampshire House. He stated that the organizers of the press conference would have preferred to have more time to plan, but the New Hampshire primary is fast approaching on January 10 and they want to inform the people of what they believe has transpired. The group will also invite the attorney general and all New Hampshire representatives. “My plan is to put out an announcement to all representatives inviting them to support us and to come,” he said.
Final details of the time and place will be released shortly.
Wednesday, December 28, 2011
Let Us Engage the Real Enemy – Please!
“OVERWHELMING SHAME”
by Neil Sankey, ©2011
Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.
If the above image is a forgery, is it because Obama's identity and parentage are different from what has been presented to the public?
(Dec. 28, 2011) — I have just re-read an article from Mario Apuzzo’s blog dated Wednesday May 12, 2010:
The Nonsense Published by Our Nation’s Editors Regarding Obama’s Eligibility to be President
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/nonsense-published-by-our-nations.html
This was a very informative and comprehensive discussion of the whole natural born Citizen issue and the differing viewpoints relative to it. It is yet another outstanding example of how citizens, ordinary people, can, and have, become enmeshed by this frustrating and exasperating situation. Interestingly, it leads almost instantly to conflict amongst ourselves.
Of course, this is only the tip of the iceberg; there is much, much more to be said, and countless books will be written in the forthcoming years detailing over and over the extremes to which these ordinary people felt compelled to continue their endless fight to overcome overwhelming complacency, stand up and fight.
Reading articles such as these leaves me feeling only one all-encompassing emotion:
SHAME!
Yes, overwhelming shame that our great country has not, cannot and, and seemingly will not rise to defeat this evil which engulfs us.
Patriots, believers, Constitutionalists, theorists, researchers and writers, we can do no more. NOT that I would ever suggest for a moment giving up. But, we have done, collectively, all that could ever reasonably be expected of any people to engender and initiate a full and complete investigation and prosecution of the perpetrators of this enormous fraud. We have done ENOUGH; it should be happening NOW!.
Yes, I am deeply ASHAMED of the spineless, self-centered politicians particularly, and ashamed of the Judges, both of the Supreme Court and all of the other Judges in this enormous land. So far, not one of these “so-called” Civic Leaders has the intestinal fortitude to emerge from their pampered cocoons to realize that we, the Country, is in dire distress and action is immediately required!
One must also be ashamed, regretfully, at the Law Enforcement organizations within this country. Their Oaths are plain; they are, without exception, sworn to protect US, “WE THE PEOPLE,” not the ruling regime. To date they have not stepped up to this task, with one or two very welcome exceptions; maybe there is just a shred of hope!.
I am ashamed of the real “Democrats” if they still exist. Where are the true Citizens in the Democrat Party, and why are they not complaining loudly from the rooftops that their party has been infiltrated and taken over by the Islamo-Marxists?
“Islamo-Marxists?” they say, “Oh, no, you can’t say that!” Conservative Presidential Candidate Governor Romney (allegedly a “Conservative”) won’t even use the term “Socialist,” let alone “Marxist!” Now, how on this God’s Earth are we going to solve this problem when our “own people” don’t have the guts to call it what it really is! Was it not Malcolm X himself at the Hajj who realized the true impact and power to be had by the association of Marxism and Islam? Or dare we not mention that?
Which takes me to another point which seems to be confusing some, including “Birthers” and “Tea Partiers” alike. For some time, I have espoused the opinion that Malcolm X may, in some way, be involved in the ancestry of our current White House Occupant. Recent brilliant narrative by the renowned author Martha Trowbridge has taken us all by storm. Her story-line, so far, is strongly suggestive of the urgent need for a new look at the parentage of “The One” and especially offers a basis for his extreme views.
“It contradicts everything we have fought for,” some have said!
NO, IT DOES NOT; think about it!
After all we have done so far, I have never seen one scrap of hard definitive proof of the original “Dunham” story. It could well be a story that has been created, or a “Re-invention,” as Malcolm would have called it.
What does exist has either been proven to be forgeries (Birth Certificates) or could easily be forgeries. Most every photograph has been altered or retouched. Indeed, one little-known fact is the photograph on a beach, cited time and again, allegedly showing Stanley Ann Dunham in a bikini, which is generally used to display the fact that she was not pregnant, and is in fact a photograph of none other than Barbara BUSH in her younger days!. The original may be seen in the Reagan Library!
This is deception, folks! This is Marxism at its best.
” The issue is not the issue!”
“The end is what you want; the means is how you get it.”
It does not matter; it is all FRAUD.
“So, if he was born in New York to Jo Ann Newman and Malcolm X, that would make him a Natural Born Citizen, right?”
It does not matter; it is all FRAUD.
IS IT NOT TIME SOMETHING WAS DONE ABOUT IT??
Yes, it is frustrating; it leads to arguments amongst ourselves since we always seem to want to viciously attack everyone else’s ideas!
I am sure that we are all so tired of the endless fighting and bickering amongst ourselves on the various blogs, our adversaries are defeating us before we start.
I would call on you all to STOP IT, put it aside. Yes, all of you: bloggers and others who have these petty arguments on the internet, open for all our adversaries to see. STOP, put aside all your EGOs for once, because the people you are fighting are not your real enemies.
READ Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” and USE IT AGAINST THEM!
Go to David Horowitz’s bookstore and read some of those; they are cheap enough!
http://frontpagemag.com/store/
There is a man in the White House who will not properly identify himself, and WE SIMPLY DO NOT KNOW WHO OUR “PRESIDENT” IS.
It is no small wonder that they don’t want voters to identify themselves at the polls!
So, America, as you relax this Christmas week, you may safely assume that we have a total fraud in the office of President with his Malcolm X, Saul Alinsky, Cloward and Piven, Marxist-Leninist-influenced finger on the nuclear trigger. He is in charge of your military and calling all the shots, taking away your freedoms, rights and demanding yet another Trillion to waste on paybacks to his buddies!
Is that OK with you, America?
FOR GOD’S SAKE, PEOPLE, IT IS OUR COUNTRY, OUR WAY OF LIFE, OUR VERY EXISTENCE THAT IS AT STAKE HERE!
Is it not high time we all put aside our differences, real or imagined, and band together to defeat this scourge with one voice?
“OVERWHELMING SHAME”
by Neil Sankey, ©2011
Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.
If the above image is a forgery, is it because Obama's identity and parentage are different from what has been presented to the public?
(Dec. 28, 2011) — I have just re-read an article from Mario Apuzzo’s blog dated Wednesday May 12, 2010:
The Nonsense Published by Our Nation’s Editors Regarding Obama’s Eligibility to be President
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/nonsense-published-by-our-nations.html
This was a very informative and comprehensive discussion of the whole natural born Citizen issue and the differing viewpoints relative to it. It is yet another outstanding example of how citizens, ordinary people, can, and have, become enmeshed by this frustrating and exasperating situation. Interestingly, it leads almost instantly to conflict amongst ourselves.
Of course, this is only the tip of the iceberg; there is much, much more to be said, and countless books will be written in the forthcoming years detailing over and over the extremes to which these ordinary people felt compelled to continue their endless fight to overcome overwhelming complacency, stand up and fight.
Reading articles such as these leaves me feeling only one all-encompassing emotion:
SHAME!
Yes, overwhelming shame that our great country has not, cannot and, and seemingly will not rise to defeat this evil which engulfs us.
Patriots, believers, Constitutionalists, theorists, researchers and writers, we can do no more. NOT that I would ever suggest for a moment giving up. But, we have done, collectively, all that could ever reasonably be expected of any people to engender and initiate a full and complete investigation and prosecution of the perpetrators of this enormous fraud. We have done ENOUGH; it should be happening NOW!.
Yes, I am deeply ASHAMED of the spineless, self-centered politicians particularly, and ashamed of the Judges, both of the Supreme Court and all of the other Judges in this enormous land. So far, not one of these “so-called” Civic Leaders has the intestinal fortitude to emerge from their pampered cocoons to realize that we, the Country, is in dire distress and action is immediately required!
One must also be ashamed, regretfully, at the Law Enforcement organizations within this country. Their Oaths are plain; they are, without exception, sworn to protect US, “WE THE PEOPLE,” not the ruling regime. To date they have not stepped up to this task, with one or two very welcome exceptions; maybe there is just a shred of hope!.
I am ashamed of the real “Democrats” if they still exist. Where are the true Citizens in the Democrat Party, and why are they not complaining loudly from the rooftops that their party has been infiltrated and taken over by the Islamo-Marxists?
“Islamo-Marxists?” they say, “Oh, no, you can’t say that!” Conservative Presidential Candidate Governor Romney (allegedly a “Conservative”) won’t even use the term “Socialist,” let alone “Marxist!” Now, how on this God’s Earth are we going to solve this problem when our “own people” don’t have the guts to call it what it really is! Was it not Malcolm X himself at the Hajj who realized the true impact and power to be had by the association of Marxism and Islam? Or dare we not mention that?
Which takes me to another point which seems to be confusing some, including “Birthers” and “Tea Partiers” alike. For some time, I have espoused the opinion that Malcolm X may, in some way, be involved in the ancestry of our current White House Occupant. Recent brilliant narrative by the renowned author Martha Trowbridge has taken us all by storm. Her story-line, so far, is strongly suggestive of the urgent need for a new look at the parentage of “The One” and especially offers a basis for his extreme views.
“It contradicts everything we have fought for,” some have said!
NO, IT DOES NOT; think about it!
After all we have done so far, I have never seen one scrap of hard definitive proof of the original “Dunham” story. It could well be a story that has been created, or a “Re-invention,” as Malcolm would have called it.
What does exist has either been proven to be forgeries (Birth Certificates) or could easily be forgeries. Most every photograph has been altered or retouched. Indeed, one little-known fact is the photograph on a beach, cited time and again, allegedly showing Stanley Ann Dunham in a bikini, which is generally used to display the fact that she was not pregnant, and is in fact a photograph of none other than Barbara BUSH in her younger days!. The original may be seen in the Reagan Library!
This is deception, folks! This is Marxism at its best.
” The issue is not the issue!”
“The end is what you want; the means is how you get it.”
It does not matter; it is all FRAUD.
“So, if he was born in New York to Jo Ann Newman and Malcolm X, that would make him a Natural Born Citizen, right?”
It does not matter; it is all FRAUD.
IS IT NOT TIME SOMETHING WAS DONE ABOUT IT??
Yes, it is frustrating; it leads to arguments amongst ourselves since we always seem to want to viciously attack everyone else’s ideas!
I am sure that we are all so tired of the endless fighting and bickering amongst ourselves on the various blogs, our adversaries are defeating us before we start.
I would call on you all to STOP IT, put it aside. Yes, all of you: bloggers and others who have these petty arguments on the internet, open for all our adversaries to see. STOP, put aside all your EGOs for once, because the people you are fighting are not your real enemies.
READ Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” and USE IT AGAINST THEM!
Go to David Horowitz’s bookstore and read some of those; they are cheap enough!
http://frontpagemag.com/store/
There is a man in the White House who will not properly identify himself, and WE SIMPLY DO NOT KNOW WHO OUR “PRESIDENT” IS.
It is no small wonder that they don’t want voters to identify themselves at the polls!
So, America, as you relax this Christmas week, you may safely assume that we have a total fraud in the office of President with his Malcolm X, Saul Alinsky, Cloward and Piven, Marxist-Leninist-influenced finger on the nuclear trigger. He is in charge of your military and calling all the shots, taking away your freedoms, rights and demanding yet another Trillion to waste on paybacks to his buddies!
Is that OK with you, America?
FOR GOD’S SAKE, PEOPLE, IT IS OUR COUNTRY, OUR WAY OF LIFE, OUR VERY EXISTENCE THAT IS AT STAKE HERE!
Is it not high time we all put aside our differences, real or imagined, and band together to defeat this scourge with one voice?
Monday, December 12, 2011
What if OPOVV is Not the Next POTUS?
RESTORING THE REPUBLIC
by One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet
Editor's Note: See my Reply at the bottom of this article.
Should the Federal Reserve, a private corporation with foreign ties, have control of our currency and economy?
(Dec. 11, 2011) — Good question. Let’s talk turkey for a couple of minutes. The chances that America will choose a President in 2012 who will stop this downward spiral into oblivion, an unrecognizable America, are so remote as to be nonsensical. That’s right, a Dark Horse who has made it as plain as the day is long that he will not take one red cent in campaign contributions from any source whatsoever to run for President won’t be elected because most of Americans don’t get it and never will. Okay, they elected Obama, but that’s not the point. These people are so far gone to the Dark Side that they’d elect Obama for a second term, presumably so he could enact Sharia Law as the law of the land.
“Necks First! Jobs Second!” should be the campaign slogan for all of the candidates. That’s right, why waste time talking about jobs and healthcare when the chances are that you may not be around to see any of it anyway? We are at war with Islam, a Totalitarian system of government that wants America so bad they can taste it. Deport each and every Muslim from the United States, including American citizens who want to play traitor. Give them a choice: leave or prison, because being a Muslim is tantamount to being a traitor: you either support the Constitution or you’re out of here. And if anyone has a problem with that, you’re more than welcome to move: it’s what we call freedom.
The word “illegal” has lost its punch; I say we put the punch back in. How? It’s really very simple: deport each and every illegal immigrant. Oh, you say the children are in high school but the parents are illegal, what then? Wax in your ear? It’s doable so let’s do it. If the parents don’t respect American law, I wouldn’t hold my breath to give out future citizenship awards to their illegal offspring.
Abolish the Federal Reserve Bank by not renewing its charter, which ends December 2013. Get the dollar backed by a physical entity; a dollar being equal to a carrot is worth more than a dollar equal to an empty promise.
Render every law that the imposter Obama signed null and void along with every rule and regulation enacted under the illegal Obama regime. Abolish the Department of Homeland Security. Introduce a flat sales tax of 10% and abolish the IRS and all of its deferments and shelters, forever ancient history.
And that’s for starters, that is, if we want our country back and our safety improved.
And speaking of safety, stop this “revolving door” so-called system of justice we have in America. The escalating drug violence can be attributed to America’s insatiable appetite to fill up the empty hours of the empty lives of people whose food on the table is not dependent on their total mental commitment. Those who ingest the drugs are contributing to the downfall of the Empire of Freedom by diverting resources that would otherwise be available to target other illegal activity; money, time and effort wasted pursuing the transportation and distribution of illegal substances could be spent on educating people on the advantages of education, the belief being that a knowledgeable citizen is more valuable to the welfare of the general good than a complete loser, because irrespective of how much money is thrown at a problem, it’s all for nothing if those on the receiving end don’t receive the help.
Johnny can’t read; hell, Johnny can’t even speak proper English, can’t diagram a sentence, and most likely doesn’t have, and never will have, a high school diploma.
Is it Johnny’s fault that he was raised on Gangsta Rap lyrics, that he was passed from grade to grade without ever learning to read? Oh, Johnny can read, but he was never taught the reason to gain knowledge from a book. Yes, at some point Johnny has to put two and two together, or you know what? We’ll have on our hands millions of losers like the character in Richard Wright’s Native Son and we’ll end up with an uneducated voter electing someone like Obama. Wait, it’s already been done, which just goes to show you that the whole education system DOESN”T WORK.
I’d fix it, and the best and fastest way to at least get it started is a high school diploma and a driver’s license, in English.
Look, fixing the mistakes of the past may not be easy or popular, but if we don’t do it and do it NOW, we’ll have nobody to blame but ourselves when the green flag of Islam is raised over the White House.
OPOVV@yahoo.com
Editor's Reply:
Right on, OPOVV..
However, What if OPOVV IS the Next POTUS?
What seems IMPROBABLE, UNPREDICTABLE, and IMPOSSIBLE to man…
is POSSIBLE to God, if we but turn it over to Him in faith… trusting, believing.
God has ALWAYS used the improbable, unpredictable and impossible ones that were willing to yield to Him in obedience. ie: Moses, David, Daniel, John, Peter, etc.
What does God want YOU to do? Maybe, just maybe, be the next POTUS.
Are YOU willing to allow Him to lead you… one step at a time?
If so, I am addressing the next POTUS.
… With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible. (Matt 19:26b)
RESTORING THE REPUBLIC
by One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet
Editor's Note: See my Reply at the bottom of this article.
Should the Federal Reserve, a private corporation with foreign ties, have control of our currency and economy?
(Dec. 11, 2011) — Good question. Let’s talk turkey for a couple of minutes. The chances that America will choose a President in 2012 who will stop this downward spiral into oblivion, an unrecognizable America, are so remote as to be nonsensical. That’s right, a Dark Horse who has made it as plain as the day is long that he will not take one red cent in campaign contributions from any source whatsoever to run for President won’t be elected because most of Americans don’t get it and never will. Okay, they elected Obama, but that’s not the point. These people are so far gone to the Dark Side that they’d elect Obama for a second term, presumably so he could enact Sharia Law as the law of the land.
“Necks First! Jobs Second!” should be the campaign slogan for all of the candidates. That’s right, why waste time talking about jobs and healthcare when the chances are that you may not be around to see any of it anyway? We are at war with Islam, a Totalitarian system of government that wants America so bad they can taste it. Deport each and every Muslim from the United States, including American citizens who want to play traitor. Give them a choice: leave or prison, because being a Muslim is tantamount to being a traitor: you either support the Constitution or you’re out of here. And if anyone has a problem with that, you’re more than welcome to move: it’s what we call freedom.
The word “illegal” has lost its punch; I say we put the punch back in. How? It’s really very simple: deport each and every illegal immigrant. Oh, you say the children are in high school but the parents are illegal, what then? Wax in your ear? It’s doable so let’s do it. If the parents don’t respect American law, I wouldn’t hold my breath to give out future citizenship awards to their illegal offspring.
Abolish the Federal Reserve Bank by not renewing its charter, which ends December 2013. Get the dollar backed by a physical entity; a dollar being equal to a carrot is worth more than a dollar equal to an empty promise.
Render every law that the imposter Obama signed null and void along with every rule and regulation enacted under the illegal Obama regime. Abolish the Department of Homeland Security. Introduce a flat sales tax of 10% and abolish the IRS and all of its deferments and shelters, forever ancient history.
And that’s for starters, that is, if we want our country back and our safety improved.
And speaking of safety, stop this “revolving door” so-called system of justice we have in America. The escalating drug violence can be attributed to America’s insatiable appetite to fill up the empty hours of the empty lives of people whose food on the table is not dependent on their total mental commitment. Those who ingest the drugs are contributing to the downfall of the Empire of Freedom by diverting resources that would otherwise be available to target other illegal activity; money, time and effort wasted pursuing the transportation and distribution of illegal substances could be spent on educating people on the advantages of education, the belief being that a knowledgeable citizen is more valuable to the welfare of the general good than a complete loser, because irrespective of how much money is thrown at a problem, it’s all for nothing if those on the receiving end don’t receive the help.
Johnny can’t read; hell, Johnny can’t even speak proper English, can’t diagram a sentence, and most likely doesn’t have, and never will have, a high school diploma.
Is it Johnny’s fault that he was raised on Gangsta Rap lyrics, that he was passed from grade to grade without ever learning to read? Oh, Johnny can read, but he was never taught the reason to gain knowledge from a book. Yes, at some point Johnny has to put two and two together, or you know what? We’ll have on our hands millions of losers like the character in Richard Wright’s Native Son and we’ll end up with an uneducated voter electing someone like Obama. Wait, it’s already been done, which just goes to show you that the whole education system DOESN”T WORK.
I’d fix it, and the best and fastest way to at least get it started is a high school diploma and a driver’s license, in English.
Look, fixing the mistakes of the past may not be easy or popular, but if we don’t do it and do it NOW, we’ll have nobody to blame but ourselves when the green flag of Islam is raised over the White House.
OPOVV@yahoo.com
Editor's Reply:
Right on, OPOVV..
However, What if OPOVV IS the Next POTUS?
What seems IMPROBABLE, UNPREDICTABLE, and IMPOSSIBLE to man…
is POSSIBLE to God, if we but turn it over to Him in faith… trusting, believing.
God has ALWAYS used the improbable, unpredictable and impossible ones that were willing to yield to Him in obedience. ie: Moses, David, Daniel, John, Peter, etc.
What does God want YOU to do? Maybe, just maybe, be the next POTUS.
Are YOU willing to allow Him to lead you… one step at a time?
If so, I am addressing the next POTUS.
… With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible. (Matt 19:26b)
Direct Message to Obama
“I’M GOING TO SEND YOU PACKING”
by One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet
Esquire Representation Declaration signed and notarized on December 5, 2011 by presidential candidate Tom MacLeran
(Dec. 6, 2011) — A couple of months ago, I challenged you, the de facto illegal Muslim immigrant con artist masquerading as the President of the United States, to an open debate, and I stated that you could have your administration with you to kibitz, if needed. I wasn’t even afforded a “Sorry, not today” response. Alright, I’m a big boy, my feelings weren’t hurt, but I still want you out of my future house. That’s right, I’m going to send you packing.
This One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet is stepping up to the plate; actually, ALL FIFTY OF THEM, and I, along with a few others, most notably Orly Taitz, Esq, are going to be your worst nightmare. This is not a threat: I never waste my time with threats, never have, never will. If I say it, consider it done. You’re going down, and I’m the one who’s going to do it. I am a qualified-eligible-United States natural born Citizen-Honorably discharged Vietnam Veteran with Good Conduct-candidate for President in 2012-Natural Born part Native American Indian and a Patriot and you, Barry Soetoro, or whatever you’re calling yourself today, are nothing but an embarrassment. You’re in my country, and I want you outta here.
OPOVV@yahoo.com
—————————
Editor’s Note: The text of the Declaration reads:
I, Thomas G. MacLeran, am a registered candidate with the Federal Elections Commission in the Republican Party, September 27, 2011 — FEC CANDIDATE ID NUMBER P20003463 — running against Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and others, in the primaries and caucuses.
I am attesting that I am joining Attorney Orly Taitz in her complaints in all 50 states of the union, challenging the eligibility of Barack Obama by the demands set forth in the U.S.C. United States Ballot as a qualified candidate.
I further attest to those reading this: With Obama’s own released Long Form Birth Certificate showing his father to be a citizen of Kenya, East Africa at the time of Obama’s birth that Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America, according to the precedent of U.S.C. Art II Sect. I Clause 5 and the United States Supreme Court Law in Minor v. Happersett confirming those born to “citizens” “within the United States” were never in doubt of being a “Natural Born Citizen”.
I would like to be represented by Attorney Taitz in the State of California and pro hac vice in 49 other states if the law will allow pro hac vice representation. I expressly would like to be represented by Orly Taitz before Judge Rhonda Nishimura in Hawaii and Judge Michael Malihi in Georgia, as well as other judges to be signed in other states. In case pro hac vice is not granted, I wish to be a co-plaintiff with Attorney Taitz and I state that this action does not impede my filing any other claim if the representation of the declaration is not satisfied.
I declare under penalty of perjury, that the above is true and correct.
I am aware that Attorney Taitz is licensed in the State of California, and admitted to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit and the Supreme Court of the United States. I am aware that she is not licensed in other states and I expressly waive all liability claims against Attorney Taitz and any and all entities affiliated with her, arising out of the representation of me.
Thomas G. MacLeran
“I’M GOING TO SEND YOU PACKING”
by One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet
Esquire Representation Declaration signed and notarized on December 5, 2011 by presidential candidate Tom MacLeran
(Dec. 6, 2011) — A couple of months ago, I challenged you, the de facto illegal Muslim immigrant con artist masquerading as the President of the United States, to an open debate, and I stated that you could have your administration with you to kibitz, if needed. I wasn’t even afforded a “Sorry, not today” response. Alright, I’m a big boy, my feelings weren’t hurt, but I still want you out of my future house. That’s right, I’m going to send you packing.
This One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet is stepping up to the plate; actually, ALL FIFTY OF THEM, and I, along with a few others, most notably Orly Taitz, Esq, are going to be your worst nightmare. This is not a threat: I never waste my time with threats, never have, never will. If I say it, consider it done. You’re going down, and I’m the one who’s going to do it. I am a qualified-eligible-United States natural born Citizen-Honorably discharged Vietnam Veteran with Good Conduct-candidate for President in 2012-Natural Born part Native American Indian and a Patriot and you, Barry Soetoro, or whatever you’re calling yourself today, are nothing but an embarrassment. You’re in my country, and I want you outta here.
OPOVV@yahoo.com
—————————
Editor’s Note: The text of the Declaration reads:
I, Thomas G. MacLeran, am a registered candidate with the Federal Elections Commission in the Republican Party, September 27, 2011 — FEC CANDIDATE ID NUMBER P20003463 — running against Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and others, in the primaries and caucuses.
I am attesting that I am joining Attorney Orly Taitz in her complaints in all 50 states of the union, challenging the eligibility of Barack Obama by the demands set forth in the U.S.C. United States Ballot as a qualified candidate.
I further attest to those reading this: With Obama’s own released Long Form Birth Certificate showing his father to be a citizen of Kenya, East Africa at the time of Obama’s birth that Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America, according to the precedent of U.S.C. Art II Sect. I Clause 5 and the United States Supreme Court Law in Minor v. Happersett confirming those born to “citizens” “within the United States” were never in doubt of being a “Natural Born Citizen”.
I would like to be represented by Attorney Taitz in the State of California and pro hac vice in 49 other states if the law will allow pro hac vice representation. I expressly would like to be represented by Orly Taitz before Judge Rhonda Nishimura in Hawaii and Judge Michael Malihi in Georgia, as well as other judges to be signed in other states. In case pro hac vice is not granted, I wish to be a co-plaintiff with Attorney Taitz and I state that this action does not impede my filing any other claim if the representation of the declaration is not satisfied.
I declare under penalty of perjury, that the above is true and correct.
I am aware that Attorney Taitz is licensed in the State of California, and admitted to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit and the Supreme Court of the United States. I am aware that she is not licensed in other states and I expressly waive all liability claims against Attorney Taitz and any and all entities affiliated with her, arising out of the representation of me.
Thomas G. MacLeran
IF OBAMA LOSES, HE INTENDS TO BRING DOWN THE COUNTRY WITH HIM
Members of Congress Cower or Collaborate, As Obama Prepares his Race and Class War
by Lawrence Sellin, ©2011
Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.
Obama's supporters claim that his alleged birth in Hawaii is enough to make him a "natural born Citizen," but scholars such as Dr. Herb Titus invoking "natural law" claim that his foreign father precludes it
(Dec. 12, 2011) — Win or lose, chaos is at the core of Obama’s 2012 campaign strategy.
The Constitution and the American way of life are already under intense assault by enemies of the republic. The signs of degeneration are out there in plain sight.
The Obama Administration has spent the United States treasury to the brink of national bankruptcy, which has set the stage for the desired social unrest.
The Occupy War Street movement was just a test of Obama’s chaos strategy. The weakness demonstrated by politicians nationwide has only encouraged future, larger and more violent confrontations to support the Obama agenda either to transform America by force or, if that fails, destroy her.
Expect Occupy Flash Mobs to increase attacks on businesses and Obama opponents.
Watch for the number of premeditated racial incidents to increase.
To shape the outcome, the Obama campaign will continue to solicit international pressure directed at American election procedures and voters.
Obama will encourage open borders to flood the country with illegal immigrants to sow disorder and intimidate potential Republican voters.
Spearheaded by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder, the Obama Administration is promoting policies that could make criticism of Islam a crime in the United States and erode our First Amendment rights.
Martial law could be an option under consideration.
The Senate’s 2012 National Defense Authorization Act would allow the military to detain American citizens indefinitely without trial.
Coincidentally, the U.S. Army is aggressively recruiting Internment/Resettlement Specialists (31E), who are primarily responsible for day-to-day operations in a military confinement and correctional facility or detention and internment facility.
Meanwhile, Obama and his Congressional allies continue to weaken our national defense.
Defying standard procedures to recover or destroy it, Obama allowed the Iranians to capture the technologically advanced RQ-170 drone.
Obama’s appalling decision permits America’s enemies to reverse-engineer the stealth spy drone, unlocking the aircraft’s structural and software secrets and undermining national security.
That outcome may not be terribly surprising because George Soros, Obama’s puppet master, funds the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), a powerful Iranian government lobbying group in Washington, D.C. The NIAC chief, Trita Parsi, has been described as”an intellectually dishonest regime apologist and an unofficial and unregistered lobbyist for the Iranian regime.”
To further undermine the American military readiness, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), along with 91 other senators, approved the 926-page Defense Department authorization bill that included a provision to repeal the military’s ban on sodomy and bestiality.
When future historians study the sunset of the American republic, they will shake their heads in disbelief, knowing that Obama could have been removed from office at any time, if only members of Congress had not been stupid, corrupt or cowardly.
Obama is not a natural born citizen and he has never been eligible for the office of President. See the explanation here and here.
In addition, Obama has forged his birth documents and Selective Service registration and uses a Social Security number not issued to him.
Unfortunately, Republican leaders have decided to maintain a protective shield of silence and dispense disinformation about Obama’s Constitutionally illegal Presidency and his crimes in order to hide their own complicity in the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.
The chaos is coming and those disgraceful politicians will have blood on their traitorous hands.
———————–
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com
Members of Congress Cower or Collaborate, As Obama Prepares his Race and Class War
by Lawrence Sellin, ©2011
Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.
Obama's supporters claim that his alleged birth in Hawaii is enough to make him a "natural born Citizen," but scholars such as Dr. Herb Titus invoking "natural law" claim that his foreign father precludes it
(Dec. 12, 2011) — Win or lose, chaos is at the core of Obama’s 2012 campaign strategy.
The Constitution and the American way of life are already under intense assault by enemies of the republic. The signs of degeneration are out there in plain sight.
The Obama Administration has spent the United States treasury to the brink of national bankruptcy, which has set the stage for the desired social unrest.
The Occupy War Street movement was just a test of Obama’s chaos strategy. The weakness demonstrated by politicians nationwide has only encouraged future, larger and more violent confrontations to support the Obama agenda either to transform America by force or, if that fails, destroy her.
Expect Occupy Flash Mobs to increase attacks on businesses and Obama opponents.
Watch for the number of premeditated racial incidents to increase.
To shape the outcome, the Obama campaign will continue to solicit international pressure directed at American election procedures and voters.
Obama will encourage open borders to flood the country with illegal immigrants to sow disorder and intimidate potential Republican voters.
Spearheaded by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder, the Obama Administration is promoting policies that could make criticism of Islam a crime in the United States and erode our First Amendment rights.
Martial law could be an option under consideration.
The Senate’s 2012 National Defense Authorization Act would allow the military to detain American citizens indefinitely without trial.
Coincidentally, the U.S. Army is aggressively recruiting Internment/Resettlement Specialists (31E), who are primarily responsible for day-to-day operations in a military confinement and correctional facility or detention and internment facility.
Meanwhile, Obama and his Congressional allies continue to weaken our national defense.
Defying standard procedures to recover or destroy it, Obama allowed the Iranians to capture the technologically advanced RQ-170 drone.
Obama’s appalling decision permits America’s enemies to reverse-engineer the stealth spy drone, unlocking the aircraft’s structural and software secrets and undermining national security.
That outcome may not be terribly surprising because George Soros, Obama’s puppet master, funds the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), a powerful Iranian government lobbying group in Washington, D.C. The NIAC chief, Trita Parsi, has been described as”an intellectually dishonest regime apologist and an unofficial and unregistered lobbyist for the Iranian regime.”
To further undermine the American military readiness, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), along with 91 other senators, approved the 926-page Defense Department authorization bill that included a provision to repeal the military’s ban on sodomy and bestiality.
When future historians study the sunset of the American republic, they will shake their heads in disbelief, knowing that Obama could have been removed from office at any time, if only members of Congress had not been stupid, corrupt or cowardly.
Obama is not a natural born citizen and he has never been eligible for the office of President. See the explanation here and here.
In addition, Obama has forged his birth documents and Selective Service registration and uses a Social Security number not issued to him.
Unfortunately, Republican leaders have decided to maintain a protective shield of silence and dispense disinformation about Obama’s Constitutionally illegal Presidency and his crimes in order to hide their own complicity in the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.
The chaos is coming and those disgraceful politicians will have blood on their traitorous hands.
———————–
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)