QUESTIONS ABOUT OBAMA’S BIRTHPLACE AND PARENTAGE ARE STILL UNANSWERED
Was Obama Sr.’s “U.S. Citizen Wife in the Philippines” Stanley Ann Dunham?
by Sharon Rondeau
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.
Was Stanley Ann Dunham an unmarried expectant mother in 1961 who left the country to have her child?
(Jul. 7, 2011) — Despite numerous FOIA requests made and lawsuits filed against the U.S. State Department, no travel or passport information on Stanley Ann Dunham prior to 1965 has been made available to the public. Contrary to a State Department assertion that “Many passport applications and other non-vital records were destroyed during the 1980s in accordance with guidance from the General Services Administration,” neither the GSA nor NARA was able to locate any evidence that such destruction took place.
The current U.S. Department of Justice states on its FOIA page:
…Obama and Attorney General Holder have directed agencies to apply a presumption of openness in responding to FOIA requests. The Attorney General specifically called on agencies not to withhold information just because it technically falls within an exemption and he also encouraged agencies to make discretionary releases of records. The Attorney General emphasized that the President has called on agencies to work in a spirit of cooperation with FOIA requesters. The Office of Information Policy at the Department of Justice oversees agency compliance with these directives and encourages all agencies to fully comply with both the letter and the spirit of the FOIA. …Obama has pledged to make this the most transparent Administration in history.
Regarding exceptions to the 1966 FOIA law, the web page states:
Not all records can be released under the FOIA. Congress established certain categories of information that are not required to be released in response to a FOIA request because release would be harmful to governmental or private interests. These categories are called “exemptions” from disclosures. Still, even if an exemption applies, agencies may use their discretion to release information when there is no foreseeable harm in doing so and disclosure is not otherwise prohibited by law. There are nine categories of exempt information and each is described below.
Exemption 1: Information that is classified to protect national security. The material must be properly classified under an Executive Order.
Exemption 2: Information related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency.
Exemption 3: Information that is prohibited from disclosure by another federal law. Examples of laws which Courts have approved for use under Exemption 3 can be found here.
Exemption 4: Information that concerns business trade secrets or other confidential commercial or financial information.
Exemption 5: Information that concerns communications within or between agencies which are protected by legal privileges, that include but are not limited to:
Attorney-Work Product Privilege
Attorney-Client Privilege
Deliberative Process Privilege
Presidential Communications Privilege
Exemption 6: Information that, if disclosed, would invade another individual’s personal privacy.
Exemption 7: Information compiled for law enforcement purposes if one of the following harms would occur. Law enforcement information is exempt if it:
7(A). Could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings
7(B). Would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication
7(C). Could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy
7(D). Could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source
7(E). Would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions
7(F). Could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual
Exemption 8: Information that concerns the supervision of financial institutions.
Exemption 9: Geological information on wells.
Mr. Kenneth Allen supplied The Post & Email with additional information recently released to him on Barack Hussein Obama Sr. as a result of an additional Freedom of Information request which quotes Obama Sr. as having told INS authorities that he had an American wife overseas in April 1964.
Dated 4/21/64, a memo entitled “RE: A11 938 537 – BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA” indicates that Obama had attended the University of Hawaii from 1959 to 1962, graduating with a Bachelor of Arts degree. It continues:
Transferred to Harvard in September 1962 to study for Ph.D. in Economics. Expects to get degree in 2-3 years and then go home. Had not filled in marital status, etc. and employment portion of I-539. E.J.Golden said to hold up extension for present.
Talked with Miss Frost at Harvard as alien claimed he couldn’t remember where he had worked in the U.S. She said he works on research at Harvard; and that Mr. Henry, one of the Harvard officials, intends to talk to subject re his marital situation. Harvard thinks he’s married to someone in Kenya and someone in Honolulu, but that possibly he belongs to a tribe where multiple marriages are O.K.
Mr. Henry may not talk to him until after his exams in case he might get upset and use that as an excuse for not passing. Harvard will call us with the results of the interview.
After alien stated he was married, he said he was separated and thatthey [sic] may get a divorce. The wife in the Philippines from whom he is separated is a U.S.C. Memo on yellow paper in file indicates he had wife in Kenya when he arrived in U.S. in 1959.
Was the wife “in the Philippines” Stanley Ann Dunham? What was the “U.S.C. wife” to Barack Obama Sr. doing overseas? If it was Dunham, why wasn’t she in Hawaii as her biography typically reads? If Dunham had “fallen in love with a grad student” in Hawaii, why did Harvard state that Obama Sr. had achieved a B.A. as of 1962, not 1960 or 1961?
If Stanley Ann Dunham left the United States between 1960 and 1964, the years for which records have been unavailable, she would have had to have applied for a passport, yet the State Department maintains that the records were “destroyed.” If she had her baby overseas and that baby is Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Hussein Obama II, is he a natural born Citizen as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution?
If some records for Lolo Soetoro and Stanley Ann Dunham were finally made available to Mr. Allen, why was nothing released under the name “Barry Soetoro,” which appears to be an alias for Barack Hussein Obama II? The exemption frequently cited on the documents is (b)(6), which claims privacy concerns, just as the Hawaii Department of Health has in regard to releasing Obama’s original birth certificate, if in fact they have it.
While Obama Sr. supposedly had a wife in Honolulu, why did he tell immigration authorities that a U.S. citizen wife was in the Philippines?
An article dated July 7, 2011 from The Boston Globe states that Obama Sr. told an INS official that he and his “USC wife,” who was expecting his child, had discussed arranging for an adoption of the baby. If they were married, why would they have discussed such a thing? The article contains no documentation or external links to source the information.
Page 21 from documentation released by the State Department on Barack Hussein Obama stating that he had a U.S. citizen wife in the Philippines in April 1964
Were Obama Sr. and Stanley Ann Dunham ever really married? Obama had already been married to a Kenyan woman, Kezia, and although it has been reported that he “divorced” her, it has also been reported that Kezia gave her approval for Obama to take another wife and even became “friends” with Stanley Ann.
Did Dunham go to Kenya to have her baby with the expectation that the child’s father’s family would raise him? If she had gone overseas for the birth of the baby, she would have needed a passport. Mysteriously, the State Department has maintained that it doesn’t have the records, which could imply that they did or do exist.
The address provided in the two purported birth announcements for Obama II stating the parents’ address does not agree with the address which the father provided in his application for a visa extension in August 1961. He lists a wife, Ann Dunham, but does not provide her address on the form when asked, nor does he acknowledge having a child born earlier that month.
One of Stanley Ann’s biographers, Janny Scott, stated that Stanley Ann married Lolo Soetoro in 1964, but records released by the State Department revealed that Dunham married Soetoro in 1965, although she provided two different dates for the marriage.
Did the biographer use original sources such as documents from the State Department or Hawaii Department of Health to arrive at the 1964 date? If not, how much of the biography is accurate? Where are the footnotes stating Ms. Scott’s sources? Writer Jack Cashill has also questioned the reliability of Scott’s work, citing the lack of information regarding Ann Dunham’s relationship with Barack Obama Sr., their alleged wedding and the months leading up to the alleged birth of Barack Obama II.
A Certificate of Marriage document released by the State Department with signatures and signed statement of certification shows a marriage date of March 1965.
Portion of marriage certificate for Stanley Ann Dunham and Lolo Soetoro
Another biography of Dunham states that she and Lolo Soetoro were not yet married in 1967. An article published shortly after the 2008 presidential election maintains that Barack Hussein Obama II was born in Kogelo, Kenya. The same article states that Dunham married Soeotor in 1967, not 1965.
Why are there so many inconsistencies in the histories of Stanley Ann Dunham and her son, Barry Soetoro/Barack Hussein Obama II?
The document which Obama claimed as a certified copy of his original birth certificate on file with the Hawaii Department of Health is lacking the statement present on his mother’s marriage certificate from 1965, four years later, which reads:
This certifies that the above is a true and correct copy of the original record on file in the research and statistics office
Hawaii State Department of Health
There are two signatures below the statement: Walter B. Quisenberry, M.D., Director of Health, and George H. Tokuyama, State Registrar, and the document is dated “3-15-65.”
Other documents released contain the (b)(6) privacy exemption:
If Stanley Ann Dunham and Lolo Soetoro are deceased, whose privacy could the State Department be protecting?
Document dated 7-19-65 regarding whether or not Lolo Soetoro should be granted a waiver to allow him to remain in the United States following the expiration of his visa. The same (b)(6) exemption is used to redact information.
Obama’s “birth certificate” does not bear the signature of the director of the Hawaii Department of Health, currently Loretta J. Fuddy. However, the birth certificates released by Eleanor Nordyke, the mother of the twin girls born on August 5, 1961 at Kapiolani Medical Center, have the same statement quoted above which appears on the marriage certificate for Stanley Ann Dunham and Lolo Soetoro, including the two signatures below it.
Without that statement of certification, is the long-form birth certificate bearing Obama’s name authentic? Is his social security number? Is his real name Barack Hussein Obama II or Barry Soetoro?
Is there anything authentic about him?
Of the FOIA release, Mr. Allen told The Post & Email, “the 118 pages aren’t all I asked for, I asked for much more. I have 2 years to file suit for the rest and because the answer from the 9th circuit is due I’ll see what else I can retrieve.”
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
Sunday, July 10, 2011
What About Barry Soetoro and the Casey Anthony Trial?
WHY ISN’T LYING A CRIME FOR EVERYONE?
by Gary Steven
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.
Is it a lie that Obama is even an American citizen? Why have others, including the media, lied for Obama?
(Jul. 8, 2011) — The Casey Anthony case dominates all major news. Commentators and pundits from various networks are having lively discussions and often heated debates since the verdict of “not guilty” to the murder charges was handed down by the jury. However, the jury found Casey Anthony guilty of lying on four counts, each count punishable by one year in prison.
Not one major media outlet has covered the comparative crime by Barry Soetero, aka Barack Obama. Lying is a crime. Whether you agree with the outcome of the Casey Anthony case or not, the charges of lying which were brought forth reveal a rule of law that was broken.
Often, jokes about politicians bring a chuckle or cynical smile during conversations. For example, one person says, “How do you know a politician is lying?” and the other answers, “His lips are moving.” Then, rather than be alarmed by the truth of the inference in the joke, we, perhaps in silence, agree that it is the norm and expected of politicians. That is a broken moral compass for sure. The putative president has earned the distinction as liar-in-chief. This title is not only based on campaign promises broken, but also the consistent falsehood of his background, his agenda for America, and his blatant disregard for truth.
The space required to list the outright lies would far surpass this column’s capability. There are the documented lies on camera before audiences. The speeches. The national addresses before both chambers of Congress (remember “Health care will not increase the deficit one dime?) filled with lies. There are the lies to his family, lies to the military personnel, lies to voters, lies about his background, lies about the economy, lies about pulling out of Iraq, lies about Libya, lies about transparency.
The central issue to this article poses a HUGE question: Why is Barry Soetero not legally charged with lying? The one document he provided allegedly proving his birthplace is a forgery. Many experts (even former CIA agents) have gone on the record stating this FACT. Lying is a moral virus. The lies perpetuate more lies. The deceit becomes contagious to others. The Congress then lies to cover the lies already told. The structure built on lies is weak. The longevity of such a structure, whether political, relational, or economic, will not last. Collapse is imminent. Lies have no color. Lies are not little or white (no racial reference here) as in, “little white lie.“
The visual impact of the Anthony case mentioned above should be a stimulating comparison. Anthony was charged with four counts of lying and sentenced to a prison term of one year for each lie by the judge. Since the judge followed the sentencing guidelines, one could easily conclude that Barry Soetero should be charged with hundreds of counts of LYING. By simple math it is easy to see more than a life’s sentence afforded the liar-in-chief. Arresting him may be a problem. Why? The participating liars don’t want their lies exposed.
What about the LIE before millions of people? Under oath, Barry Soetero swore to uphold, defend, and protect the Constitution. Has he done that? Perjury is also a crime, lying under oath. Where is the rule of law? Does it apply only in Orlando, FL? Do all politicians lie? Does truth exist in DC? Where are the leaders who proclaim moral values and integrity? The deceit continues. Five hundred thirty-five congressional members decide issues for the lives of 310,000,000 Americans.
The liar-in-chief with corrupt staff has an agenda. Leaders, beware; your lies will find you out.
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
WHY ISN’T LYING A CRIME FOR EVERYONE?
by Gary Steven
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.
Is it a lie that Obama is even an American citizen? Why have others, including the media, lied for Obama?
(Jul. 8, 2011) — The Casey Anthony case dominates all major news. Commentators and pundits from various networks are having lively discussions and often heated debates since the verdict of “not guilty” to the murder charges was handed down by the jury. However, the jury found Casey Anthony guilty of lying on four counts, each count punishable by one year in prison.
Not one major media outlet has covered the comparative crime by Barry Soetero, aka Barack Obama. Lying is a crime. Whether you agree with the outcome of the Casey Anthony case or not, the charges of lying which were brought forth reveal a rule of law that was broken.
Often, jokes about politicians bring a chuckle or cynical smile during conversations. For example, one person says, “How do you know a politician is lying?” and the other answers, “His lips are moving.” Then, rather than be alarmed by the truth of the inference in the joke, we, perhaps in silence, agree that it is the norm and expected of politicians. That is a broken moral compass for sure. The putative president has earned the distinction as liar-in-chief. This title is not only based on campaign promises broken, but also the consistent falsehood of his background, his agenda for America, and his blatant disregard for truth.
The space required to list the outright lies would far surpass this column’s capability. There are the documented lies on camera before audiences. The speeches. The national addresses before both chambers of Congress (remember “Health care will not increase the deficit one dime?) filled with lies. There are the lies to his family, lies to the military personnel, lies to voters, lies about his background, lies about the economy, lies about pulling out of Iraq, lies about Libya, lies about transparency.
The central issue to this article poses a HUGE question: Why is Barry Soetero not legally charged with lying? The one document he provided allegedly proving his birthplace is a forgery. Many experts (even former CIA agents) have gone on the record stating this FACT. Lying is a moral virus. The lies perpetuate more lies. The deceit becomes contagious to others. The Congress then lies to cover the lies already told. The structure built on lies is weak. The longevity of such a structure, whether political, relational, or economic, will not last. Collapse is imminent. Lies have no color. Lies are not little or white (no racial reference here) as in, “little white lie.“
The visual impact of the Anthony case mentioned above should be a stimulating comparison. Anthony was charged with four counts of lying and sentenced to a prison term of one year for each lie by the judge. Since the judge followed the sentencing guidelines, one could easily conclude that Barry Soetero should be charged with hundreds of counts of LYING. By simple math it is easy to see more than a life’s sentence afforded the liar-in-chief. Arresting him may be a problem. Why? The participating liars don’t want their lies exposed.
What about the LIE before millions of people? Under oath, Barry Soetero swore to uphold, defend, and protect the Constitution. Has he done that? Perjury is also a crime, lying under oath. Where is the rule of law? Does it apply only in Orlando, FL? Do all politicians lie? Does truth exist in DC? Where are the leaders who proclaim moral values and integrity? The deceit continues. Five hundred thirty-five congressional members decide issues for the lives of 310,000,000 Americans.
The liar-in-chief with corrupt staff has an agenda. Leaders, beware; your lies will find you out.
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
Friday, July 1, 2011
Stipulation to Produce Obama’s SSN Application Sent to DOJ Attorneys
WILL ATTORNEYS PROTECTING OBAMA’S DOCUMENTATION OR LACK THEREOF CONTINUE TO STONEWALL?
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.
by Sharon Rondeau
The Social Security Administration has not released a copy of Obama's original social security number application. At least two private investigators have stated that the number he is using was not assigned to him originally.
(Jul. 1, 2011) — As part of the discovery phase of her lawsuit to obtain the social security number application for Barack Hussein Obama II, Atty. Orly Taitz has sent the following request to three Justice Department attorneys currently acting as defense counsel for the Social Security Administration (SSA). The Post & Email previously covered the case here and here.
DR. ORLY TAITZ ESQ
29839 SANTA MARGARITA STE 100
RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CA 92688
Ph.949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
07.01.2011
Att Tony West
Assistant Attorney general
Elizabeth J. Shapiro
Deputy director
Federal Programs Branch
Patrick Nemeroff
Trial Atty, U.S. Dep’t of Justice
Civil Division, federal Programs branch
20 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20530
Fax 202-305-8517
Phone 202-305-8727
Patrick.g.nemeroff@usdoj.gov
Request to stipulate to production of the application to SS_5 application to SSN 042-68-4425
Taitz v Astrue 11-cv-402 RCL
Dear Ms. Shapiro, Mr. West and Mr. Nemeroff
While FOIA legal actions do not require meet and confer, I am extending this letter as part of meet and confer and request to stipulate to production of the requested SS-5 application to SSN 042-68-4425, which is used by Mr. Obama since around 1980, but was shown by the SSN, as one, never assigned to Mr. Obama.
Documents provided in this case, as well as additional documents, provided with this letter show, that Mr. Obama is defrauding the whole nation and illegally occupying the position of the President and Commander in Chief, while using a cheap forgery instead of a valid birth certificate, invalid Social Security number and forged or fraudulently obtained other vital records.
I would like to reiterate, that If you and your client, commissioner of the Social Security administration Michael Astrue, who happen to be a licensed attorney and an officer of the court as well, refuse to stipulate and produce requested application, you and your client become complicit to the crimes committed by Mr. Obama against 311 million American citizens, and a formal complaint will be forwarded to the Attorney’s bar of the District of Columbia, as well as Inspector General of the Department of Justice, House Judiciary Committee and House oversight committee.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
—————————–
Of this most recent action, Taitz stated that she has addressed both Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, and his agency’s defense attorneys: “You people are complicit in all the crimes committed by Obama. We have a forged birth certificate and a criminal in the White House. You are engaged in a cover-up. You either stipulate that you will release the documents or you will be prosecuted together with him, and I’m going to the House Oversight Committee, the Department of Justice, and the Bar of the District of Columbia. It’s horrible. I’m keeping their feet to the fire.”
A statement of facts “not in dispute” filed today by the defendant’s attorneys provides a timeline of events in the case.
WILL ATTORNEYS PROTECTING OBAMA’S DOCUMENTATION OR LACK THEREOF CONTINUE TO STONEWALL?
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.
by Sharon Rondeau
The Social Security Administration has not released a copy of Obama's original social security number application. At least two private investigators have stated that the number he is using was not assigned to him originally.
(Jul. 1, 2011) — As part of the discovery phase of her lawsuit to obtain the social security number application for Barack Hussein Obama II, Atty. Orly Taitz has sent the following request to three Justice Department attorneys currently acting as defense counsel for the Social Security Administration (SSA). The Post & Email previously covered the case here and here.
DR. ORLY TAITZ ESQ
29839 SANTA MARGARITA STE 100
RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CA 92688
Ph.949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
07.01.2011
Att Tony West
Assistant Attorney general
Elizabeth J. Shapiro
Deputy director
Federal Programs Branch
Patrick Nemeroff
Trial Atty, U.S. Dep’t of Justice
Civil Division, federal Programs branch
20 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20530
Fax 202-305-8517
Phone 202-305-8727
Patrick.g.nemeroff@usdoj.gov
Request to stipulate to production of the application to SS_5 application to SSN 042-68-4425
Taitz v Astrue 11-cv-402 RCL
Dear Ms. Shapiro, Mr. West and Mr. Nemeroff
While FOIA legal actions do not require meet and confer, I am extending this letter as part of meet and confer and request to stipulate to production of the requested SS-5 application to SSN 042-68-4425, which is used by Mr. Obama since around 1980, but was shown by the SSN, as one, never assigned to Mr. Obama.
Documents provided in this case, as well as additional documents, provided with this letter show, that Mr. Obama is defrauding the whole nation and illegally occupying the position of the President and Commander in Chief, while using a cheap forgery instead of a valid birth certificate, invalid Social Security number and forged or fraudulently obtained other vital records.
I would like to reiterate, that If you and your client, commissioner of the Social Security administration Michael Astrue, who happen to be a licensed attorney and an officer of the court as well, refuse to stipulate and produce requested application, you and your client become complicit to the crimes committed by Mr. Obama against 311 million American citizens, and a formal complaint will be forwarded to the Attorney’s bar of the District of Columbia, as well as Inspector General of the Department of Justice, House Judiciary Committee and House oversight committee.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
—————————–
Of this most recent action, Taitz stated that she has addressed both Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, and his agency’s defense attorneys: “You people are complicit in all the crimes committed by Obama. We have a forged birth certificate and a criminal in the White House. You are engaged in a cover-up. You either stipulate that you will release the documents or you will be prosecuted together with him, and I’m going to the House Oversight Committee, the Department of Justice, and the Bar of the District of Columbia. It’s horrible. I’m keeping their feet to the fire.”
A statement of facts “not in dispute” filed today by the defendant’s attorneys provides a timeline of events in the case.
Saturday, June 18, 2011
The Essence of Racism
ISN’T MAKING SPECIAL ALLOWANCES FOR SOMEONE BASED ON SKIN COLOR PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT?
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.
June 18, 2011
Dear Editor:
The following was sent to Nebraska State Senator Brenda Council, whose response to a citizen regarding the Obama eligibility issue accused the citizen of being a “racist.”
Dear Senator Council;
It has come to my attention that you are calling those of us who endeavor to support and defend the Constitution that you seem to abhor – ‘racists’:
From: “Sen. Council, Brenda”
Date: June 3, 2011 12:05:42 PM PDT
To: “Arnie Rosner”
Subject: RE: Agnostic’s Dreaded Verdict: Birthers Are (Mainly) Right
If you a birther, you are racist. It’s offensive. Stop contacting us.
Chris Triebsch
Senator Brenda Council’s Office (NB-11)
402-471-2612
Because there is so much of this offensive and unfounded name calling (e.g. Article II Constitutionalists are called ‘Birthers’ and ‘Racists’), I felt that it was important to set the record straight with this short article that I called ‘The ESSENCE of RACISM’. See if you don’t agree, and, if not, please tell me why not:
Dear Member of the 112th Congress;
‘THE ESSENCE OF RACISM’
The Essence of Racism is in treating two candidates differently because of the skin color of one.
The FACTS:
John Sydney McCain is WHITE/Caucasian;
Barack Hussein Obama is BLACK/Mulatto;
The TREATMENT:
In the 2008 campaign for President, John McCain was required to show his Long Form Birth Certificate AND the location of the birth, AND the nationality/citizenship of his parents at the time of McCain’s birth.
BUT NOT FOR OBAMA – The essence of racism.
Following that racist demand that ‘Whitey’ McCain ‘show his papers’, the Senate (including Obama) voted on SR-511, declaring McCain to be a ‘natural born Citizen’ (as required by Art II, Section 1, Clause 5) BECAUSE he was born of two U.S. citizen parents.
BUT NOT FOR OBAMA – The essence of racism.
The POT(US)* CALLS THE KETTLE BLACK
* POT(US) = President of the United States (pun intended)
So the ‘racist’ Obama calls Americans who stand up for our laws and our Constitution – RACISTS. By his interpretation, understanding, and use of the word – all us Article II Constitutionalists should be proud to be called a ‘racist’ by Obama and his cabal of thugs and supporters.
It is not a crime to be ‘racist’ (unless you think that laws enforcing ‘thought control’ are acceptable under the unalienable rights of our Constitution), but it is a crime to aid and abet in knowingly seating a usurper in the Office of President and Commander in Chief. It is also a crime to continue to aid and abet in his crimes of Treason:
– from his unconstitutional suspension of Posse Comitatus;
– to declaring unconstitutional wars without the approval of Congress;
– to attacking sovereign states for defending their borders, while failing in his sworn duty to do so himself;
– to posting blatantly forged documents concerning his purported place and condition of birth: Mispersonization of Identity, a Federal crime and an impeachable offense, punishable by 15 years in Leavenworth prison (NOTE to all members of the 112th Congress: Misprision of Mispersonization of Identity carries the same penalty);
– and to violating his oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic, etc., etc.
… it is a crime to continue to aid and abet without calling for immediate IMPEACHMENT proceedings under charges of TREASON.
However, you, as a member of Congress, can possibly redeem yourself, lest you be charged with Misprision of Felony/Mispersonization/Treason, by calling for his IMPEACHMENT NOW!
Stop calling Article II Constitutionalists ‘RACISTS’ and instead do your sworn duty to support and defend the Constitution – by calling for IMPEACHMENT NOW!
Neil Turner
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
ISN’T MAKING SPECIAL ALLOWANCES FOR SOMEONE BASED ON SKIN COLOR PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT?
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.
June 18, 2011
Dear Editor:
The following was sent to Nebraska State Senator Brenda Council, whose response to a citizen regarding the Obama eligibility issue accused the citizen of being a “racist.”
Dear Senator Council;
It has come to my attention that you are calling those of us who endeavor to support and defend the Constitution that you seem to abhor – ‘racists’:
From: “Sen. Council, Brenda”
Date: June 3, 2011 12:05:42 PM PDT
To: “Arnie Rosner”
Subject: RE: Agnostic’s Dreaded Verdict: Birthers Are (Mainly) Right
If you a birther, you are racist. It’s offensive. Stop contacting us.
Chris Triebsch
Senator Brenda Council’s Office (NB-11)
402-471-2612
Because there is so much of this offensive and unfounded name calling (e.g. Article II Constitutionalists are called ‘Birthers’ and ‘Racists’), I felt that it was important to set the record straight with this short article that I called ‘The ESSENCE of RACISM’. See if you don’t agree, and, if not, please tell me why not:
Dear Member of the 112th Congress;
‘THE ESSENCE OF RACISM’
The Essence of Racism is in treating two candidates differently because of the skin color of one.
The FACTS:
John Sydney McCain is WHITE/Caucasian;
Barack Hussein Obama is BLACK/Mulatto;
The TREATMENT:
In the 2008 campaign for President, John McCain was required to show his Long Form Birth Certificate AND the location of the birth, AND the nationality/citizenship of his parents at the time of McCain’s birth.
BUT NOT FOR OBAMA – The essence of racism.
Following that racist demand that ‘Whitey’ McCain ‘show his papers’, the Senate (including Obama) voted on SR-511, declaring McCain to be a ‘natural born Citizen’ (as required by Art II, Section 1, Clause 5) BECAUSE he was born of two U.S. citizen parents.
BUT NOT FOR OBAMA – The essence of racism.
The POT(US)* CALLS THE KETTLE BLACK
* POT(US) = President of the United States (pun intended)
So the ‘racist’ Obama calls Americans who stand up for our laws and our Constitution – RACISTS. By his interpretation, understanding, and use of the word – all us Article II Constitutionalists should be proud to be called a ‘racist’ by Obama and his cabal of thugs and supporters.
It is not a crime to be ‘racist’ (unless you think that laws enforcing ‘thought control’ are acceptable under the unalienable rights of our Constitution), but it is a crime to aid and abet in knowingly seating a usurper in the Office of President and Commander in Chief. It is also a crime to continue to aid and abet in his crimes of Treason:
– from his unconstitutional suspension of Posse Comitatus;
– to declaring unconstitutional wars without the approval of Congress;
– to attacking sovereign states for defending their borders, while failing in his sworn duty to do so himself;
– to posting blatantly forged documents concerning his purported place and condition of birth: Mispersonization of Identity, a Federal crime and an impeachable offense, punishable by 15 years in Leavenworth prison (NOTE to all members of the 112th Congress: Misprision of Mispersonization of Identity carries the same penalty);
– and to violating his oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic, etc., etc.
… it is a crime to continue to aid and abet without calling for immediate IMPEACHMENT proceedings under charges of TREASON.
However, you, as a member of Congress, can possibly redeem yourself, lest you be charged with Misprision of Felony/Mispersonization/Treason, by calling for his IMPEACHMENT NOW!
Stop calling Article II Constitutionalists ‘RACISTS’ and instead do your sworn duty to support and defend the Constitution – by calling for IMPEACHMENT NOW!
Neil Turner
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
Obama Not Subject to Charges of Treason?
FOR MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION AND FRAUD
by Sher Zieve, ©2011
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of the Post & Email.
Why has this man been allowed to usurp the presidency and commit crimes against the United States?
(Jun. 18, 2011) — Treason is generally defined as “betrayal of country: a violation of the allegiance owed by somebody to his or her own country, e.g. by aiding an enemy.” High treason is defined as “treason perpetrated by somebody against his or her own country.” Another apt definition of treason is “any attempt to overthrow the government or impair the well-being of a state to which one owes allegiance; the crime of giving aid or comfort to the enemies of one’s government.” It is my contention that Barack Hussein Obama has perpetrated all of these. It is also my assertion that our current Congress and an increasingly leftist court system have allowed–and are continuing to allow–Obama to perpetrate such treachery upon the United States of America and its citizens.
Obama begins immediate attacks against USA and We-the-People
Prior to his announced campaign for President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama was never vetted as to his eligibility to run for the office. Almost immediately after Barack Hussein Obama’s 2008 election to the most powerful position in the USA and, arguably the world, one of his first–if not the first–Executive fiats issued was that all of his prior records (school transcripts, passport information, his birth certificate etc) were to be sealed and summarily hidden from the American people and the world. Since that time, Obama has produced multiple “birth certificates” that have each been proven to be fraudulent, including the ostensible long-form birth certificate released 27 April 2011.
Almost immediately thereafter and within the first week of his ostensible presidency, Obama issued Executive Orders to fund foreign countries abortions, donate at least $20 Millions to terrorist Hamas (under the guise of “Palestinian relief”) and began testing his ability to censor and/or end the First Amendment by order via another Executive Order to ban showing or posting the video of his retaking the Oath of Office. Along with myriad other mysteries, one has to ponder why this was a great concern to Obama.
Shortly thereafter, Obama issued another Executive Order that brought the Census Bureau under his sole jurisdiction and control. This strongly appears to have been affected by Obama, in order that he–alone–would have the ability to control and skew any and all census results that did not meet with his approval. After he gained (many say “usurped”) the Office of the US Presidency, Obama–almost instantly–began attempts to unravel the US Constitution’s First Amendment. These attempts ranged from banning and refusing to speak with reporters who asked him tough questions to actually locking them in closets! With no one stopping him the Obama syndicate becomes increasingly bolder and more criminal every day.
Obama’s Dictatorship begins expanding (almost) exponentially
When he discovered–even after the 2010 mid-term elections–that no one from the Establishment Republican side of the House of Representatives would stop him, Obama stepped up his game to establish the USA’s first official dictatorship. Side note: Even the new Speaker of the House–Rep. John Boehner–apparently desires and prefers golfing with Mr. Obama to actually saving the country from the ongoing tyrannical takeover being perpetrated by Obama and his minions. Despite a letter questioning Obama’s authority to wage war against Libya, recently sent to Obama by Boehner, Boehner and the other Republicans-in-name-only continue to embolden Obama toward expanding his growing dictatorship.
Obama has purposefully and with apparently growing malice against the USA and its people caused the US economy to be destroyed, has worked to end jobs for Americans and laughs at us–on video–on an almost daily basis. The latest slap from Obama–which includes his statement laughing at our expense–is his comment on jobs projects that he had said were supposed to be “Shovel-ready“: “Shovel-ready was not as shovel-ready as we expected.”
In April of this year, Obama mocked a man who had asked him about the extremely high gasoline prices and laughed at him while he said laughing: “I know some o’ these big guys, there still drivin’ [sic] their big SUVs. You know, they got their big monster trucks and everything. You’re one of ‘em? [points to man in audience]. Well now, here’s my point. You know, if you’re complaining about the price of gas, and you’re only getting’ [sic] 8 miles a gallon [laughs at man, pauses for audience to laugh at man, mocks the man with facial expression]… You know [laughs] you might have a big family, but it’s probably not THAT big [laughs, audience laughs]… So – how many you have, 10 kids you say? 10 kids? [mocking facial expression again, encouraging people to laugh at the man] Well… you definitely need a hybrid van then… Like I said, if you’re getting’ [sic] 8 miles a gallon you might wanna [sic] think about a trade-in.”
Yet, Obama continues to spend money overseas to our enemies–our money–and give money to his Unions, while partying at the White House as if there’s no tomorrow and spending $$Billions on his and his families increasingly frequent and extravagant vacations. And now with the lack of any real opposition from either Congress or the growing Socialist/Communist court system, Obama is being given full sway to do whatever her pleases to attack and decimate both We-the-People and our country–and he IS doing it. No wonder he laughs at and derides us at every opportunity!
Obama gives an indication of our dire future (if he is not removed)
Obama and his (now misnamed) Department of Justice chief Eric Holder have filed suit against Arizona and other States (now to include Georgia) who had the audacity to fight the annihilation of their States due to the US government’s refusal to enforce laws against illegal invasion. And he has encouraged other countries (Mexico and other Latin American countries) to do the same. Obama is now siding firmly with foreign countries against the United States of America. This is called High-treason. These actions on the part of the US government constitute no less than its attempt to bring down the country, throw out Federalism and end the US Constitution’s protections for both the States and the citizens of our country and establish a dictatorship. There is no other viable or logical conclusion.
The latest atrocity committed against We-the-People is Obama’s response to Boehner’s letter regarding Obama’s now illegal war in Libya in which Boehner cites the US Constitution’s Article 1, Section 8: “The Congress shall have Power…. To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years; To provide and maintain a Navy; To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces; To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions…” Obama’s response is that the United Nations now trumps or replaces the US Constitution. Obama wrote: “U.S. forces are playing a constrained and supporting role in a multinational coalition, whose operations are both legitimated by and limited to the terms of a United Nations Security Council Resolution that authorizes the use of force solely to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under attack or threat of attack and to enforce a no-fly zone and an arms embargo.” Obama has now “officially” done away with the US Constitution and made the USA subservient to the United Nations.
Virtually–or literally–every day Barack Hussein Obama is committing at least one if not multiple treasons and high-treasons against the United States of America. And STILL he is allowed to do so with nary a scolding…or a whimper. Nothing is ever done to stop him. Isn’t it time for us to do so? Isn’t it? Who or what group might be willing to organize a few massive marches on D.C. and especially Congress to stop this insanity and destruction of our country, our lives and all that we have built? Otherwise, there seems to be no other solution except explosions of violent civil unrest. Even dyed-in-the-wool Democrat James Carville said: “You know, look — this is a humanitarian — you know, you’re smart enough to see this. People, you know, if it continues, we’re going to start to see civil unrest in this country. I hate to say that, but I think it’s imminently possible.”
“And all the world wondered after the beast. And they worshiped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshiped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?” Revelation 13:3-5. We-the-People can…if we have both the resolve and the courage to do so.
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
FOR MULTIPLE VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION AND FRAUD
by Sher Zieve, ©2011
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of the Post & Email.
Why has this man been allowed to usurp the presidency and commit crimes against the United States?
(Jun. 18, 2011) — Treason is generally defined as “betrayal of country: a violation of the allegiance owed by somebody to his or her own country, e.g. by aiding an enemy.” High treason is defined as “treason perpetrated by somebody against his or her own country.” Another apt definition of treason is “any attempt to overthrow the government or impair the well-being of a state to which one owes allegiance; the crime of giving aid or comfort to the enemies of one’s government.” It is my contention that Barack Hussein Obama has perpetrated all of these. It is also my assertion that our current Congress and an increasingly leftist court system have allowed–and are continuing to allow–Obama to perpetrate such treachery upon the United States of America and its citizens.
Obama begins immediate attacks against USA and We-the-People
Prior to his announced campaign for President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama was never vetted as to his eligibility to run for the office. Almost immediately after Barack Hussein Obama’s 2008 election to the most powerful position in the USA and, arguably the world, one of his first–if not the first–Executive fiats issued was that all of his prior records (school transcripts, passport information, his birth certificate etc) were to be sealed and summarily hidden from the American people and the world. Since that time, Obama has produced multiple “birth certificates” that have each been proven to be fraudulent, including the ostensible long-form birth certificate released 27 April 2011.
Almost immediately thereafter and within the first week of his ostensible presidency, Obama issued Executive Orders to fund foreign countries abortions, donate at least $20 Millions to terrorist Hamas (under the guise of “Palestinian relief”) and began testing his ability to censor and/or end the First Amendment by order via another Executive Order to ban showing or posting the video of his retaking the Oath of Office. Along with myriad other mysteries, one has to ponder why this was a great concern to Obama.
Shortly thereafter, Obama issued another Executive Order that brought the Census Bureau under his sole jurisdiction and control. This strongly appears to have been affected by Obama, in order that he–alone–would have the ability to control and skew any and all census results that did not meet with his approval. After he gained (many say “usurped”) the Office of the US Presidency, Obama–almost instantly–began attempts to unravel the US Constitution’s First Amendment. These attempts ranged from banning and refusing to speak with reporters who asked him tough questions to actually locking them in closets! With no one stopping him the Obama syndicate becomes increasingly bolder and more criminal every day.
Obama’s Dictatorship begins expanding (almost) exponentially
When he discovered–even after the 2010 mid-term elections–that no one from the Establishment Republican side of the House of Representatives would stop him, Obama stepped up his game to establish the USA’s first official dictatorship. Side note: Even the new Speaker of the House–Rep. John Boehner–apparently desires and prefers golfing with Mr. Obama to actually saving the country from the ongoing tyrannical takeover being perpetrated by Obama and his minions. Despite a letter questioning Obama’s authority to wage war against Libya, recently sent to Obama by Boehner, Boehner and the other Republicans-in-name-only continue to embolden Obama toward expanding his growing dictatorship.
Obama has purposefully and with apparently growing malice against the USA and its people caused the US economy to be destroyed, has worked to end jobs for Americans and laughs at us–on video–on an almost daily basis. The latest slap from Obama–which includes his statement laughing at our expense–is his comment on jobs projects that he had said were supposed to be “Shovel-ready“: “Shovel-ready was not as shovel-ready as we expected.”
In April of this year, Obama mocked a man who had asked him about the extremely high gasoline prices and laughed at him while he said laughing: “I know some o’ these big guys, there still drivin’ [sic] their big SUVs. You know, they got their big monster trucks and everything. You’re one of ‘em? [points to man in audience]. Well now, here’s my point. You know, if you’re complaining about the price of gas, and you’re only getting’ [sic] 8 miles a gallon [laughs at man, pauses for audience to laugh at man, mocks the man with facial expression]… You know [laughs] you might have a big family, but it’s probably not THAT big [laughs, audience laughs]… So – how many you have, 10 kids you say? 10 kids? [mocking facial expression again, encouraging people to laugh at the man] Well… you definitely need a hybrid van then… Like I said, if you’re getting’ [sic] 8 miles a gallon you might wanna [sic] think about a trade-in.”
Yet, Obama continues to spend money overseas to our enemies–our money–and give money to his Unions, while partying at the White House as if there’s no tomorrow and spending $$Billions on his and his families increasingly frequent and extravagant vacations. And now with the lack of any real opposition from either Congress or the growing Socialist/Communist court system, Obama is being given full sway to do whatever her pleases to attack and decimate both We-the-People and our country–and he IS doing it. No wonder he laughs at and derides us at every opportunity!
Obama gives an indication of our dire future (if he is not removed)
Obama and his (now misnamed) Department of Justice chief Eric Holder have filed suit against Arizona and other States (now to include Georgia) who had the audacity to fight the annihilation of their States due to the US government’s refusal to enforce laws against illegal invasion. And he has encouraged other countries (Mexico and other Latin American countries) to do the same. Obama is now siding firmly with foreign countries against the United States of America. This is called High-treason. These actions on the part of the US government constitute no less than its attempt to bring down the country, throw out Federalism and end the US Constitution’s protections for both the States and the citizens of our country and establish a dictatorship. There is no other viable or logical conclusion.
The latest atrocity committed against We-the-People is Obama’s response to Boehner’s letter regarding Obama’s now illegal war in Libya in which Boehner cites the US Constitution’s Article 1, Section 8: “The Congress shall have Power…. To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years; To provide and maintain a Navy; To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces; To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions…” Obama’s response is that the United Nations now trumps or replaces the US Constitution. Obama wrote: “U.S. forces are playing a constrained and supporting role in a multinational coalition, whose operations are both legitimated by and limited to the terms of a United Nations Security Council Resolution that authorizes the use of force solely to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under attack or threat of attack and to enforce a no-fly zone and an arms embargo.” Obama has now “officially” done away with the US Constitution and made the USA subservient to the United Nations.
Virtually–or literally–every day Barack Hussein Obama is committing at least one if not multiple treasons and high-treasons against the United States of America. And STILL he is allowed to do so with nary a scolding…or a whimper. Nothing is ever done to stop him. Isn’t it time for us to do so? Isn’t it? Who or what group might be willing to organize a few massive marches on D.C. and especially Congress to stop this insanity and destruction of our country, our lives and all that we have built? Otherwise, there seems to be no other solution except explosions of violent civil unrest. Even dyed-in-the-wool Democrat James Carville said: “You know, look — this is a humanitarian — you know, you’re smart enough to see this. People, you know, if it continues, we’re going to start to see civil unrest in this country. I hate to say that, but I think it’s imminently possible.”
“And all the world wondered after the beast. And they worshiped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshiped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?” Revelation 13:3-5. We-the-People can…if we have both the resolve and the courage to do so.
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
Evidence Broadens Obama Natural Born Conspiracy
“ONLY THE PEOPLE CAN END THIS CRISIS”
by JB Williams, ©2011
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.
Who is Barack Hussein Obama II? Where does he come from?
(Jun. 7, 2011) — Evidence that we have a fraud and a usurper currently residing in the people’s White House is overwhelming, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. But now new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought.
The story of whom and what Barack Hussein Obama II really is – is a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell. Strong evidence suggests that he was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance.
But there was a major hurdle that had to be overcome – the U.S. Constitution, in this case, Article II – Section I – Clause V specifically, which requires that “no person except a natural-born citizen of the United States” can hold the office of President. – Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States…and may not even be a legal citizen of the United States. So, how can he be President?
This column focuses upon the period 2003-2008 and the political maneuvers that took place in order to make way for America’s first unconstitutional resident of the White House.
Efforts to Eliminate the Natural Born Requirement (2003-2005)
Proving that the players involved knew the correct definition of natural born citizen borrowed from the Law of Nations by our founders – 1) those born in the country, of parents who are citizens; 2) those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights; 3) The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; 4) in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen. – that they knew Barack Hussein Obama II did not meet that definition as a foreign or dual citizen via his father’s British citizenship and that they worked feverishly to find a way around this constitutional requirement for office, as Obama was about to become president…
The effort to remove the natural-born citizen requirement from the U.S. Constitution actually began in 1975 – when Democrat House Rep. Jonathon B. Bingham, [NY-22] introduced a constitutional amendment under H.J.R. 33 which called for the outright removal of the natural-born requirement for president found in Article II of the U.S. Constitution – “Provides that a citizen of the United States otherwise eligible to hold the Office of President shall not be ineligible because such citizen is not a natural born citizen.”
Bingham’s first attempt failed and he resurrected H.J.R. 33 in 1977 under H.J.R. 38, again failing to gain support from members of congress. Bingham was a Yale Law grad and member of the secret society Skull and Bones, later a lecturer at Columbia Law and thick as thieves with the United Nations via his membership in the Council on Foreign Relations.
Bingham’s work lay dormant for twenty-six years when it was resurrected again in 2003 as Democrat members of Congress made no less than eight (8) attempts in twenty-two (22) months, to either eliminate the natural-born requirement, or redefine natural-born to accommodate Barack Hussein Obama II in advance of his rise to power. The evidence is right in the congressional record…
1. On June 11, 2003 Democrat House member Vic Snyder [AR-2] introduced H.J.R 59 in the 108th Congress – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.” – Co-Sponsors: Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14]; Rep Delahunt, William D. [MA-10]; Rep Frank, Barney [MA-4]; Rep Issa, Darrell E. [CA-49]; Rep LaHood, Ray [IL-18]; Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4].
2. On September 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 67 – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the office of President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]
3. On February 25, 2004, Republican Senator Don Nickles [OK] attempted to counter the growing Democrat onslaught aimed at removing the natural-born citizen requirement for president in S.2128 - “Natural Born Citizen Act – Defines the constitutional term “natural born citizen,” to establish eligibility for the Office of President” – also getting the definition of natural born citizen wrong. – Co-sponsors Sen Inhofe, James M. [OK]; Sen Landrieu, Mary L. [LA]
4. On September 15, 2004 – as Barack Obama was about to be introduced as the new messiah of the Democrat Party at the DNC convention, Rep Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] introduced H.J.R. 104 – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office.” – No co-sponsors.
5. Again on January 4, 2005, Rep John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 2 to the 109th Congress – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the Office of President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]
6. Rep Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] tries again on February 1, 2005 in H.J.R. 15 – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office.” – No Co-Sponsor
7. On April 14, 2005, Rep Vic Snyder [AR-2] tries yet again with H.J.R. 42 – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4]
8. All of these efforts failing in committee and the 2008 presidential election looming with an unconstitutional candidate leading the DNC ticket, Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO] tries to attach the alteration to a military bill in S.2678 on February 28, 2008 – “Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act – Declares that the term “natural born Citizen” in article II, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution, dealing with the criteria for election to President of the United States, includes any person born to any U.S. citizen while serving in the active or reserve components of the U.S. armed forces.” – Co-Sponsors DNC Presidential candidate Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY]; DNC Presidential candidate Sen Obama, Barack [IL]; Sen Menendez, Robert [NJ]; Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] – (This was the first effort to also assure that GOP Presidential candidate Sen. John McCain [AZ] would be cleared to run against the DNC primary victor.)
From June 11, 2003 to February 28, 2008, there had been eight (8) different congressional attempts to alter Article II – Section I – Clause V – natural born citizen requirements for president in the U.S. Constitution, all of them failing in committee — All of it taking placing during Barack Obama’s rise to political power and preceding the November 2008 presidential election.
In politics, there are no coincidences… not of this magnitude.
Finally on April 10, 2008, unable to alter or remove the natural born citizen requirement to clear the way for Barack Obama, the U.S. Senate acts to shift focus before the election, introducing and passing S.R.511 – declaring Sen. John McCain a “natural born citizen” eligible to run for and hold the office of president. There was never any honest doubt about McCain, the son of a U.S. Navy Commander. The Sponsor of the resolution is Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO]
S.R.511 States that John Sidney McCain, III, is a “natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States. S.R511 passed by a 99-0 unanimous consent of the Senate, with only John McCain not voting. The basis was – “Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens;” – a condition not met by Barack Hussein Obama II. – Co-Sponsors DNC Presidential candidate Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY]; DNC Presidential candidate Sen Obama, Barack [IL]; Sen Leahy, Patrick J. [VT]; Sen Webb, Jim [VA]; Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] (They had made certain that John McCain would run against Barack Obama)
However, in the McCain resolution is also this language – “Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States; – Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;”
The U.S. Constitution is not a dictionary. The definition of “is” is not in the constitution either. Yet this is the text that would later be issued in Congressional Research Service talking points memos distributed to members of congress, to protect an individual that all members of congress know and understand to be an “unconstitutional” resident of the people’s White House – Barack Hussein Obama II.
Once again, as the political left was unable to alter the U.S. Constitution by way of legitimate constitutional process, they resorted to altering the constitution via precedent setting, in short, knowingly electing and getting away with seating an unconstitutional president in order to alter Article II requirements for the office via breaking those constitutional requirements.
The press would not ask any questions and the American people were already too ill-informed of their constitution to know or too distracted by daily life to care. The press would provide the cover, swearing to the lies of an unconstitutional administration put in power by criminal actors focused only on their lofty political agenda of forever altering the American form of government.
The people would be caught up in a steady diet of daily assaults on their individual freedom and liberty and overlook the most obvious constitutional crisis in American history, the seating of an unconstitutional and anti-American president.
Evidence of What?
Barack Obama is an unconstitutional resident of the people’s White House
He did not become America’s first unconstitutional president alone, he had help
While most of the criminal cabal are Democrats, some are Republicans
Every member of congress knew Obama was ineligible for the office of president
Every member of the U.S. Supreme Court knows that Obama is unconstitutional
Every intelligent member of the press knows the truth, but won’t dare tell this story
Numerous people tried to remove natural born citizen from the constitution
They all know the correct definition of natural born citizen and applied it to John McCain
None of these people wants to apply the same definition to Barack Obama
Nobody in the Federal Government is going to do anything about the greatest constitutional crisis in American history, because all of them are complicit on one level or another
As a result, the DNC was forced to remove the “constitutionally eligible” language from the 2008 DNC certification of the Obama-Biden ticket, omitting from the certification the following language –
“and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”
Instead, the DNC only certified that the Obama-Biden ticket was duly nominated for the offices of President and Vice President, using the following language –
“THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:” (Note that the word “through” is misspelled in both DNC versions, indicating that it is an alteration from the same document.)
Later, adding insult to injury, responding to endless public demands for documentation that would prove Obama eligible for the office he currently holds, the Obama White House issued not one but at least two (2) blatant forgeries, the first in the form of a Hawaiian COLB (Certification of Live Birth – not to be confused with a common birth certificate), and then a forged (so-called long form) Birth Certificate, otherwise known as an actual birth certificate.
Meanwhile, the entire U.S. Press has been blatantly complicit or terminally derelict in their total lack of interest in investigating or reporting these facts. The fourth estate had become a fifth column.
The Greatest Fraud Ever Perpetrated
The Obama conspiracy to seat an unconstitutional president is the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people and it has drastically altered the American system of self-governance from a constitutional republic to a corrupt democracy of frauds elected by fools.
Obama did not do this alone – he had a lot of help, including from an ignorant electorate.
But these wheels were set in motion in the late ‘90s and placed in overdrive in 2003. Numerous government officials were involved in the conspiracy to defraud the American people out of their government, including key Republicans like Darrell Issa and Tom Coburn. Every member of congress, the courts and the press, have been given the cover-up talking points by the Congressional Research Service and so far, not one individual has the honor or decency to break from those talking points and tell the American people the truth. Their government had been stolen…
Where was Obama while the Path was being cleared?
1992
Barack Obama begins working at the firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Gallard as a junior lawyer, hoping to work on civil rights cases.
Barack Obama is teaching constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School.
1992 is an election year. Barack Obama becomes the director of Illinois Project Vote, an organization focused on registering minority voters. Obama registers approximately 100,000 new voters, primarily in the African-American community.
1995
Before achieving a single significant accomplishment in life, Barack Obama releases his first memoire, Dreams from My Father. The creation of the Barack Hussein Obama II story begins.
November 7, 1995 – Barack Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, dies of ovarian cancer.
1996
Barack Obama wins the Democratic nomination for the seat, and is elected to the Illinois State Senate.
1998
After failing to accomplish anything in the Illinois Senate for two years, Barack is re-elected to the Illinois Senate.
1999
Barack Obama runs for U.S. Congress and loses due to his record of not showing up for key votes in Illinois.
2002
Barack Obama is re-elected to the Illinois Senate. Politically, his stock is rising, not due to a record of accomplishments, but rather due to his increasing circle of influential friends including Rev. Wright and William Ayers.
2003
Despite the title of Illinois most absent Senator, Barack Obama becomes chairman of the Illinois Senate’s Health and Human Services Committee.
In January 2003, Barack Obama formally enters the race for the United States Senate. Team Obama destroys Democratic rival, Blair Hull, by exposing his domestic abuse allegations.
2004
Barack Obama wins the Illinois primaries with 53 percent of the vote. In the general election, Barack Obama faces Republican candidate Jack Ryan.
Team Obama pushes Jack Ryan out of the race with reports of a sex scandal.
July 7, 2004 – Boston, Massachusetts: The Democratic National Convention introduced the new messiah of the Democrat Party to the world when 42 year old Barack Obama, who had yet to accomplish anything, becomes the hit of the John Kerry convention by the handy work of Sen. Ted Kennedy. [MA]
November 2, 2004 – Barack Obama, 43, is elected for the U.S. Senate.
2005
January 4, 2005 – Barack Obama is sworn in as a U.S. senator.
Barack’s first law is passed with Republican Tom Coburn.
2007
February 10, 2007 – Barack Obama announces his candidacy for President of the United States in the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
2008
June 3, 2008 – After defeating Senator Hillary Clinton in the primaries, Barack Obama becomes the presumptive nominee of the Democratic Party for the 2008 presidential election.
November 3, 2008 – Barack Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, age 86, dies of cancer, just one day before the Presidential Election.
November 5, 2008 – Barack Obama wins the US Presidential Election and becomes the first UNCONSTITUTIONAL President of the United States
In short, as Obama was rising through the ranks of Democrat Party power and being systematically groomed as the new messiah of the party, friends of the movement were busy making way by trying repeatedly to remove Article II – Section I – Clause V from the U.S. Constitution. When they failed to do it legitimately, they did it via setting precedent.
Despite a total lack of significant accomplishment, Obama was clearly fast-tracked by Democrat Party powers and even the massive Clinton War Machine was no match for the people behind Obama’s unparalleled rise to power.
Now you know how this nobody from nowhere came to power in almost no time at all with a completely blank résumé, and if you follow the names attached to the flood of initiatives to eliminate natural born citizenship as a requirement for the office, you can see some of the folks behind that effort.
Since many of the key figures in the three branches of the Federal government were involved in this conspiracy, we know that we cannot rely on anyone at the Federal level to address this crisis, and since we have watched the U.S. press run cover for it, we know not to expect any help from them in returning America to her people.
Only the People Can End this Crisis
From 2003 through 2008, member of congress worked to eliminate Article II – Section I – Clause V of the U.S. Constitution, requiring that all presidential candidates be natural born citizens of the United States.
In 2008, fifty state Secretaries allowed the name Barrack Hussein Obama to appear on their state ballot for the president, despite the known fact that Barrack Hussein Obama did not meet the constitutional conditions for the office sought, and that the Democrat Party had intentionally failed to certify Barrack Obama as constitutionally eligible for office.
On January 20, 2009, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Roberts administered the presidential oath of office to an individual and every member of the Supreme Court had knowledge that Barrack Hussein Obama failed to meet constitutional requirements for the office he was about to take.
The Chief Law enforcement officer in our country is head of the Department of Justice, Eric Holder. A long-time leftist comrade of Barrack Obama who uses the power of the office to silence the vice of American dissenters, while protecting all who intend America harm.
The voting fraud is so prevalent in America today that it is almost impossible to rely upon the election system as a means of correcting anything and even if you could rely on the system, decent honest qualified leaders do not run for political office in this cesspool we call a country today.
Only 25% of the nation strongly supports this White House resident, which means 75% have great doubts, with more than 35% strongly opposed.
Only the people can put this nation back on track to freedom and liberty, the rule of law and our beloved constitutional republic and they cannot do it in the election booth.
The people must rise up, stand together and hold these criminal actors accountable for the theft of our government which has become the greatest threat to the American way of life in history.
The people must wake up, stand up, come together and put this evil down and they must do it while they still have the power to do so. TAKE ACTION TODAY!
The name Barrack Hussein Obama II cannot appear on the 2012 President ballot and neither can the name of any co-conspirator. Every citizen who wants to live in freedom tomorrow must contact the appropriate officials today!
1) CLICK HERE to demand that your State Officials take immediate action to investigate the crimes of the 2008 Election, and make certain that this can never happen again by holding those responsible fully accountable. Barrack Obama should not have been on the ballot in 2008 and he cannot be allowed to appear on the ballot again in 2012.
2) CLICK HERE to send a letter to editor notifying the press of the most serious constitutional crisis in American history!
3) A list of co-conspirators will be served for their direct involvement in the effort to subvert and remove Article II of the U.S. Constitution. (More information on this effort will be forthcoming)
Government Communication software is made available to the general public at no charge, by The United States Patriots Union of Sheridan Wyoming. It’s up to the American people to demand proper solutions, take this action and follow-up until elected servants begin to act in the best interest of the people.
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
“ONLY THE PEOPLE CAN END THIS CRISIS”
by JB Williams, ©2011
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.
Who is Barack Hussein Obama II? Where does he come from?
(Jun. 7, 2011) — Evidence that we have a fraud and a usurper currently residing in the people’s White House is overwhelming, despite the overt lack of journalistic investigating on the part of the American press. But now new evidence indicates that the conspiracy to carry out that fraud was much broader than originally thought.
The story of whom and what Barack Hussein Obama II really is – is a forty-year story that requires a book, not a column, to tell. Strong evidence suggests that he was being groomed from a very young age for the moment in history that would end American supremacy in the world, and usher in a new era of Global Marxist Governance.
But there was a major hurdle that had to be overcome – the U.S. Constitution, in this case, Article II – Section I – Clause V specifically, which requires that “no person except a natural-born citizen of the United States” can hold the office of President. – Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States…and may not even be a legal citizen of the United States. So, how can he be President?
This column focuses upon the period 2003-2008 and the political maneuvers that took place in order to make way for America’s first unconstitutional resident of the White House.
Efforts to Eliminate the Natural Born Requirement (2003-2005)
Proving that the players involved knew the correct definition of natural born citizen borrowed from the Law of Nations by our founders – 1) those born in the country, of parents who are citizens; 2) those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights; 3) The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; 4) in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen. – that they knew Barack Hussein Obama II did not meet that definition as a foreign or dual citizen via his father’s British citizenship and that they worked feverishly to find a way around this constitutional requirement for office, as Obama was about to become president…
The effort to remove the natural-born citizen requirement from the U.S. Constitution actually began in 1975 – when Democrat House Rep. Jonathon B. Bingham, [NY-22] introduced a constitutional amendment under H.J.R. 33 which called for the outright removal of the natural-born requirement for president found in Article II of the U.S. Constitution – “Provides that a citizen of the United States otherwise eligible to hold the Office of President shall not be ineligible because such citizen is not a natural born citizen.”
Bingham’s first attempt failed and he resurrected H.J.R. 33 in 1977 under H.J.R. 38, again failing to gain support from members of congress. Bingham was a Yale Law grad and member of the secret society Skull and Bones, later a lecturer at Columbia Law and thick as thieves with the United Nations via his membership in the Council on Foreign Relations.
Bingham’s work lay dormant for twenty-six years when it was resurrected again in 2003 as Democrat members of Congress made no less than eight (8) attempts in twenty-two (22) months, to either eliminate the natural-born requirement, or redefine natural-born to accommodate Barack Hussein Obama II in advance of his rise to power. The evidence is right in the congressional record…
1. On June 11, 2003 Democrat House member Vic Snyder [AR-2] introduced H.J.R 59 in the 108th Congress – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.” – Co-Sponsors: Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14]; Rep Delahunt, William D. [MA-10]; Rep Frank, Barney [MA-4]; Rep Issa, Darrell E. [CA-49]; Rep LaHood, Ray [IL-18]; Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4].
2. On September 3, 2003, Rep. John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 67 – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the office of President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]
3. On February 25, 2004, Republican Senator Don Nickles [OK] attempted to counter the growing Democrat onslaught aimed at removing the natural-born citizen requirement for president in S.2128 - “Natural Born Citizen Act – Defines the constitutional term “natural born citizen,” to establish eligibility for the Office of President” – also getting the definition of natural born citizen wrong. – Co-sponsors Sen Inhofe, James M. [OK]; Sen Landrieu, Mary L. [LA]
4. On September 15, 2004 – as Barack Obama was about to be introduced as the new messiah of the Democrat Party at the DNC convention, Rep Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] introduced H.J.R. 104 – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office.” – No co-sponsors.
5. Again on January 4, 2005, Rep John Conyers [MI] introduced H.J.R. 2 to the 109th Congress – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 20 years eligible to hold the Office of President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]
6. Rep Dana Rohrabacher [CA-46] tries again on February 1, 2005 in H.J.R. 15 – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes eligible for the Office of the President non-native born persons who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years and who are otherwise eligible to hold such Office.” – No Co-Sponsor
7. On April 14, 2005, Rep Vic Snyder [AR-2] tries yet again with H.J.R. 42 – “Constitutional Amendment – Makes a person who has been a citizen of the United States for at least 35 years and who has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years eligible to hold the office of President or Vice President.” – Co-Sponsor Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4]
8. All of these efforts failing in committee and the 2008 presidential election looming with an unconstitutional candidate leading the DNC ticket, Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO] tries to attach the alteration to a military bill in S.2678 on February 28, 2008 – “Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act – Declares that the term “natural born Citizen” in article II, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution, dealing with the criteria for election to President of the United States, includes any person born to any U.S. citizen while serving in the active or reserve components of the U.S. armed forces.” – Co-Sponsors DNC Presidential candidate Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY]; DNC Presidential candidate Sen Obama, Barack [IL]; Sen Menendez, Robert [NJ]; Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] – (This was the first effort to also assure that GOP Presidential candidate Sen. John McCain [AZ] would be cleared to run against the DNC primary victor.)
From June 11, 2003 to February 28, 2008, there had been eight (8) different congressional attempts to alter Article II – Section I – Clause V – natural born citizen requirements for president in the U.S. Constitution, all of them failing in committee — All of it taking placing during Barack Obama’s rise to political power and preceding the November 2008 presidential election.
In politics, there are no coincidences… not of this magnitude.
Finally on April 10, 2008, unable to alter or remove the natural born citizen requirement to clear the way for Barack Obama, the U.S. Senate acts to shift focus before the election, introducing and passing S.R.511 – declaring Sen. John McCain a “natural born citizen” eligible to run for and hold the office of president. There was never any honest doubt about McCain, the son of a U.S. Navy Commander. The Sponsor of the resolution is Democrat Senator Claire McCaskill, [MO]
S.R.511 States that John Sidney McCain, III, is a “natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States. S.R511 passed by a 99-0 unanimous consent of the Senate, with only John McCain not voting. The basis was – “Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens;” – a condition not met by Barack Hussein Obama II. – Co-Sponsors DNC Presidential candidate Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham [NY]; DNC Presidential candidate Sen Obama, Barack [IL]; Sen Leahy, Patrick J. [VT]; Sen Webb, Jim [VA]; Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] (They had made certain that John McCain would run against Barack Obama)
However, in the McCain resolution is also this language – “Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States; – Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;”
The U.S. Constitution is not a dictionary. The definition of “is” is not in the constitution either. Yet this is the text that would later be issued in Congressional Research Service talking points memos distributed to members of congress, to protect an individual that all members of congress know and understand to be an “unconstitutional” resident of the people’s White House – Barack Hussein Obama II.
Once again, as the political left was unable to alter the U.S. Constitution by way of legitimate constitutional process, they resorted to altering the constitution via precedent setting, in short, knowingly electing and getting away with seating an unconstitutional president in order to alter Article II requirements for the office via breaking those constitutional requirements.
The press would not ask any questions and the American people were already too ill-informed of their constitution to know or too distracted by daily life to care. The press would provide the cover, swearing to the lies of an unconstitutional administration put in power by criminal actors focused only on their lofty political agenda of forever altering the American form of government.
The people would be caught up in a steady diet of daily assaults on their individual freedom and liberty and overlook the most obvious constitutional crisis in American history, the seating of an unconstitutional and anti-American president.
Evidence of What?
Barack Obama is an unconstitutional resident of the people’s White House
He did not become America’s first unconstitutional president alone, he had help
While most of the criminal cabal are Democrats, some are Republicans
Every member of congress knew Obama was ineligible for the office of president
Every member of the U.S. Supreme Court knows that Obama is unconstitutional
Every intelligent member of the press knows the truth, but won’t dare tell this story
Numerous people tried to remove natural born citizen from the constitution
They all know the correct definition of natural born citizen and applied it to John McCain
None of these people wants to apply the same definition to Barack Obama
Nobody in the Federal Government is going to do anything about the greatest constitutional crisis in American history, because all of them are complicit on one level or another
As a result, the DNC was forced to remove the “constitutionally eligible” language from the 2008 DNC certification of the Obama-Biden ticket, omitting from the certification the following language –
“and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”
Instead, the DNC only certified that the Obama-Biden ticket was duly nominated for the offices of President and Vice President, using the following language –
“THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:” (Note that the word “through” is misspelled in both DNC versions, indicating that it is an alteration from the same document.)
Later, adding insult to injury, responding to endless public demands for documentation that would prove Obama eligible for the office he currently holds, the Obama White House issued not one but at least two (2) blatant forgeries, the first in the form of a Hawaiian COLB (Certification of Live Birth – not to be confused with a common birth certificate), and then a forged (so-called long form) Birth Certificate, otherwise known as an actual birth certificate.
Meanwhile, the entire U.S. Press has been blatantly complicit or terminally derelict in their total lack of interest in investigating or reporting these facts. The fourth estate had become a fifth column.
The Greatest Fraud Ever Perpetrated
The Obama conspiracy to seat an unconstitutional president is the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people and it has drastically altered the American system of self-governance from a constitutional republic to a corrupt democracy of frauds elected by fools.
Obama did not do this alone – he had a lot of help, including from an ignorant electorate.
But these wheels were set in motion in the late ‘90s and placed in overdrive in 2003. Numerous government officials were involved in the conspiracy to defraud the American people out of their government, including key Republicans like Darrell Issa and Tom Coburn. Every member of congress, the courts and the press, have been given the cover-up talking points by the Congressional Research Service and so far, not one individual has the honor or decency to break from those talking points and tell the American people the truth. Their government had been stolen…
Where was Obama while the Path was being cleared?
1992
Barack Obama begins working at the firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Gallard as a junior lawyer, hoping to work on civil rights cases.
Barack Obama is teaching constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School.
1992 is an election year. Barack Obama becomes the director of Illinois Project Vote, an organization focused on registering minority voters. Obama registers approximately 100,000 new voters, primarily in the African-American community.
1995
Before achieving a single significant accomplishment in life, Barack Obama releases his first memoire, Dreams from My Father. The creation of the Barack Hussein Obama II story begins.
November 7, 1995 – Barack Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, dies of ovarian cancer.
1996
Barack Obama wins the Democratic nomination for the seat, and is elected to the Illinois State Senate.
1998
After failing to accomplish anything in the Illinois Senate for two years, Barack is re-elected to the Illinois Senate.
1999
Barack Obama runs for U.S. Congress and loses due to his record of not showing up for key votes in Illinois.
2002
Barack Obama is re-elected to the Illinois Senate. Politically, his stock is rising, not due to a record of accomplishments, but rather due to his increasing circle of influential friends including Rev. Wright and William Ayers.
2003
Despite the title of Illinois most absent Senator, Barack Obama becomes chairman of the Illinois Senate’s Health and Human Services Committee.
In January 2003, Barack Obama formally enters the race for the United States Senate. Team Obama destroys Democratic rival, Blair Hull, by exposing his domestic abuse allegations.
2004
Barack Obama wins the Illinois primaries with 53 percent of the vote. In the general election, Barack Obama faces Republican candidate Jack Ryan.
Team Obama pushes Jack Ryan out of the race with reports of a sex scandal.
July 7, 2004 – Boston, Massachusetts: The Democratic National Convention introduced the new messiah of the Democrat Party to the world when 42 year old Barack Obama, who had yet to accomplish anything, becomes the hit of the John Kerry convention by the handy work of Sen. Ted Kennedy. [MA]
November 2, 2004 – Barack Obama, 43, is elected for the U.S. Senate.
2005
January 4, 2005 – Barack Obama is sworn in as a U.S. senator.
Barack’s first law is passed with Republican Tom Coburn.
2007
February 10, 2007 – Barack Obama announces his candidacy for President of the United States in the 2008 U.S. presidential election.
2008
June 3, 2008 – After defeating Senator Hillary Clinton in the primaries, Barack Obama becomes the presumptive nominee of the Democratic Party for the 2008 presidential election.
November 3, 2008 – Barack Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, age 86, dies of cancer, just one day before the Presidential Election.
November 5, 2008 – Barack Obama wins the US Presidential Election and becomes the first UNCONSTITUTIONAL President of the United States
In short, as Obama was rising through the ranks of Democrat Party power and being systematically groomed as the new messiah of the party, friends of the movement were busy making way by trying repeatedly to remove Article II – Section I – Clause V from the U.S. Constitution. When they failed to do it legitimately, they did it via setting precedent.
Despite a total lack of significant accomplishment, Obama was clearly fast-tracked by Democrat Party powers and even the massive Clinton War Machine was no match for the people behind Obama’s unparalleled rise to power.
Now you know how this nobody from nowhere came to power in almost no time at all with a completely blank résumé, and if you follow the names attached to the flood of initiatives to eliminate natural born citizenship as a requirement for the office, you can see some of the folks behind that effort.
Since many of the key figures in the three branches of the Federal government were involved in this conspiracy, we know that we cannot rely on anyone at the Federal level to address this crisis, and since we have watched the U.S. press run cover for it, we know not to expect any help from them in returning America to her people.
Only the People Can End this Crisis
From 2003 through 2008, member of congress worked to eliminate Article II – Section I – Clause V of the U.S. Constitution, requiring that all presidential candidates be natural born citizens of the United States.
In 2008, fifty state Secretaries allowed the name Barrack Hussein Obama to appear on their state ballot for the president, despite the known fact that Barrack Hussein Obama did not meet the constitutional conditions for the office sought, and that the Democrat Party had intentionally failed to certify Barrack Obama as constitutionally eligible for office.
On January 20, 2009, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Roberts administered the presidential oath of office to an individual and every member of the Supreme Court had knowledge that Barrack Hussein Obama failed to meet constitutional requirements for the office he was about to take.
The Chief Law enforcement officer in our country is head of the Department of Justice, Eric Holder. A long-time leftist comrade of Barrack Obama who uses the power of the office to silence the vice of American dissenters, while protecting all who intend America harm.
The voting fraud is so prevalent in America today that it is almost impossible to rely upon the election system as a means of correcting anything and even if you could rely on the system, decent honest qualified leaders do not run for political office in this cesspool we call a country today.
Only 25% of the nation strongly supports this White House resident, which means 75% have great doubts, with more than 35% strongly opposed.
Only the people can put this nation back on track to freedom and liberty, the rule of law and our beloved constitutional republic and they cannot do it in the election booth.
The people must rise up, stand together and hold these criminal actors accountable for the theft of our government which has become the greatest threat to the American way of life in history.
The people must wake up, stand up, come together and put this evil down and they must do it while they still have the power to do so. TAKE ACTION TODAY!
The name Barrack Hussein Obama II cannot appear on the 2012 President ballot and neither can the name of any co-conspirator. Every citizen who wants to live in freedom tomorrow must contact the appropriate officials today!
1) CLICK HERE to demand that your State Officials take immediate action to investigate the crimes of the 2008 Election, and make certain that this can never happen again by holding those responsible fully accountable. Barrack Obama should not have been on the ballot in 2008 and he cannot be allowed to appear on the ballot again in 2012.
2) CLICK HERE to send a letter to editor notifying the press of the most serious constitutional crisis in American history!
3) A list of co-conspirators will be served for their direct involvement in the effort to subvert and remove Article II of the U.S. Constitution. (More information on this effort will be forthcoming)
Government Communication software is made available to the general public at no charge, by The United States Patriots Union of Sheridan Wyoming. It’s up to the American people to demand proper solutions, take this action and follow-up until elected servants begin to act in the best interest of the people.
© 2011, The Post & Email. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
Sunday, June 5, 2011
Letter to Rep. Elton Gallegly Lays it Out Straight about Obama’s Fraud and Usurpation of the Presidency
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.
“MASQUERADING AS SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE:
Dear Editor:
Will Rep. Elton Gallegly be this proud of himself after charges of treason and fraud are brought against him for allowing the presidency to be usurped by a foreigner?
The following letter was mailed today to Rep. Elton Gallegly of California’s 24th Congressional District:
May 31, 2011
Via U.S. Mail
Offices of Congressman Elton Gallegly:
2309 Rayburn HOB,
Washington, DC 20515-0523
2829 Townsgate Road, Suite 315
Thousand Oaks, CA 91361-3018
485 Alisal Road, Unit 144
Solvang, CA 93463
Re: Usurpation of the presidency of the United States ; enumerable crimes perpetrated by AKA Barack Hussein Obama; obstruction of justice by the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the U.S. government and the full and complete failure by ALL members of Congress to uphold their Constitutional oath.
Dear Congressman Gallegly:
As a member of Congress you have failed to uphold your constitutional duty to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. May I remind you that you have sworn the following oath?
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.
You Mr. Gallegly, along with the other 434 members of the House in addition to the 100 members of the U.S. Senate know full well that we have a usurper in the White House. Every so-called representative in Congress has been put on notice repeatedly by thousands of Americans. We have talked to our “representatives” one on one; we have sent letters, emails, faxes and phone calls imploring for, even demanding a formal investigation.
However, for all our efforts we have nothing to show for it. Instead our so-called representatives such as you, have chosen to lie to us, mock us and even ignore us. In a further effort to sustain the cover-up of what now constitutes the greatest constitutional crisis and national security breach in our history, the U.S. government has even resorted to spinning and twisting the law – in essence providing “talking points” for a gullible public – hiding behind an ill-conceived Congressional Research Service Memorandum that substantively misreads, misconstrues and misapplies the Constitution, and U.S. Supreme Court precedent. Further, through editing and omission changes, the meaning of federal documents have actually been altered so as to arrive at the erroneous conclusion that “Barack Hussein Obama” is in fact a natural born citizen and thus eligible to be president. Talk about corruption, disregard for the truth and utter disdain for the American people!
Mr. Gallegly, the evidence is clear and unequivocal: Barack Hussein Obama IS NOT a natural born citizen under Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution and thus IS NOT eligible to be president of the United States. You know it! Your fellow members of Congress know it. And yet collectively you and your colleagues do nothing other than perpetuate the cover-up!
Obama’s conduct as he pretends to be the legal president of the United States is so anti-American, so anti-Christian, so-foreign and so contrary to the founding principles and values upon which this great country was based that we are being divided as a nation. The very fabric our country and our Constitution is being ripped apart.
Why Mr. Gallegly do you sit on the sidelines and watch our country being destroyed; our freedoms and liberties being diminished on a daily basis? What kind of country do you want for your children and grandchildren? How can you possibly ignore the obvious?
The direction we are headed in and the power grab by this lifetime criminal and fraud is unacceptable Mr. Gallegly. Your failure and the failure of Congress to act on the evidence is an insult to all freedom-loving Americans and constitutes a willful and blatant abrogation of your constitutional duties. Mr. Gallegly, you and your colleagues disgrace yourself! You and your congressional colleagues do not deserve the trust of the American people and quite frankly should not be allowed to continue masquerading as servants of the people!
Let’s be blunt Mr. Gallegly, the government is corrupt to the core and the willingness of Congress to obfuscate, lie and distort the truth as it pertains to Obama’s usurpation of the presidency will not be allowed by those who cherish individual freedoms and the right to pursue peace and tranquility in their daily lives. We the people have had enough of the rot that pervades the government.
The “Obama” eligibility issue is not one that you can conveniently ignore by sending out form letters or by telling constituents that you think “Obama” is constitutionally qualified or by hiding behind a CRS report that was generated for the sole purpose of bamboozling the American public and providing cover for your pathetic careers. No sir, this is about upholding the Constitution and doing what is morally and ethically right. It is about preserving America’s values and protecting our freedom and liberty. Mr. Gallegly, you have a constitutional and moral obligation to speak up now and demand a formal congressional investigation of AKA Obama. Nothing less is acceptable.
Mr. Gallegly, you and the rest of the self-serving politicians in Congress work for me and my fellow Americans. ALL of you in Congress have a responsibility to provide me and my fellow citizen’s answers to these critical questions and issues. You swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. It’s time you took that oath very seriously!
To recap, let me make this abundantly clear for you Mr. Gallegly. We have a man in the white house who has facilitated a bloodless coup of the government of the United States! He is now systematically destroying the country as he ignores and disrespects the Constitution at every turn. With your help and the help of every member of Congress who has chosen to look the other way you are contributing to the decline of our nation. As a consequence of YOUR inaction, the American people are rapidly losing their freedom.
Mr. Gallegly, as a constituent of your district I demand that you respond to this letter and address the ongoing corruption within the Obama administration. I believe that a honest and thorough congressional investigation, utilizing the subpoena power and the authority of the FBI will quickly reveal that the individual known to the American people as Barack Hussein Obama has committed at a minimum the following crimes:
Usurpation of the presidency in addition to identity fraud, election fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy, voter fraud including voter intimidation, violation of bankruptcy laws, real estate fraud, voter discrimination, perjury, forgery, bribery, attempted bribery, violation of Whistle Blower law, misrepresentation, abuse of power, violation of the 14th amendment, violation of court orders, obstruction of justice, violation of the War Powers Act, ongoing violations of basic constitutional responsibilities and continued lying to the American people.
Mr. Gallegly, if I can figure out all this, why can’t you? The better question of course is why you and your fellow congresspersons continue to look the other way? What are you afraid of Mr. Gallegly? What are you waiting for? When are you going to do something about it?
Forget about politics Mr. Gallegly and direct your attention to the rule of law; i.e., compliance with the Constitution of the United States. Do what is moral; do what is just and right. Uphold your sworn duty and protect the Constitution; for all freedom-loving Americans!
I call upon you Mr. Gallegly to exhibit the integrity, decency, honesty and moral courage necessary to speak out and demand forthwith a full and complete investigation of the domestic enemy currently controlling our government. Nothing less is acceptable.
Gary Wilmott, Simi Valley, CA
Editor's Note: Reprinted with permission of The Post & Email.
“MASQUERADING AS SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE:
Dear Editor:
Will Rep. Elton Gallegly be this proud of himself after charges of treason and fraud are brought against him for allowing the presidency to be usurped by a foreigner?
The following letter was mailed today to Rep. Elton Gallegly of California’s 24th Congressional District:
May 31, 2011
Via U.S. Mail
Offices of Congressman Elton Gallegly:
2309 Rayburn HOB,
Washington, DC 20515-0523
2829 Townsgate Road, Suite 315
Thousand Oaks, CA 91361-3018
485 Alisal Road, Unit 144
Solvang, CA 93463
Re: Usurpation of the presidency of the United States ; enumerable crimes perpetrated by AKA Barack Hussein Obama; obstruction of justice by the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the U.S. government and the full and complete failure by ALL members of Congress to uphold their Constitutional oath.
Dear Congressman Gallegly:
As a member of Congress you have failed to uphold your constitutional duty to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. May I remind you that you have sworn the following oath?
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.
You Mr. Gallegly, along with the other 434 members of the House in addition to the 100 members of the U.S. Senate know full well that we have a usurper in the White House. Every so-called representative in Congress has been put on notice repeatedly by thousands of Americans. We have talked to our “representatives” one on one; we have sent letters, emails, faxes and phone calls imploring for, even demanding a formal investigation.
However, for all our efforts we have nothing to show for it. Instead our so-called representatives such as you, have chosen to lie to us, mock us and even ignore us. In a further effort to sustain the cover-up of what now constitutes the greatest constitutional crisis and national security breach in our history, the U.S. government has even resorted to spinning and twisting the law – in essence providing “talking points” for a gullible public – hiding behind an ill-conceived Congressional Research Service Memorandum that substantively misreads, misconstrues and misapplies the Constitution, and U.S. Supreme Court precedent. Further, through editing and omission changes, the meaning of federal documents have actually been altered so as to arrive at the erroneous conclusion that “Barack Hussein Obama” is in fact a natural born citizen and thus eligible to be president. Talk about corruption, disregard for the truth and utter disdain for the American people!
Mr. Gallegly, the evidence is clear and unequivocal: Barack Hussein Obama IS NOT a natural born citizen under Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution and thus IS NOT eligible to be president of the United States. You know it! Your fellow members of Congress know it. And yet collectively you and your colleagues do nothing other than perpetuate the cover-up!
Obama’s conduct as he pretends to be the legal president of the United States is so anti-American, so anti-Christian, so-foreign and so contrary to the founding principles and values upon which this great country was based that we are being divided as a nation. The very fabric our country and our Constitution is being ripped apart.
Why Mr. Gallegly do you sit on the sidelines and watch our country being destroyed; our freedoms and liberties being diminished on a daily basis? What kind of country do you want for your children and grandchildren? How can you possibly ignore the obvious?
The direction we are headed in and the power grab by this lifetime criminal and fraud is unacceptable Mr. Gallegly. Your failure and the failure of Congress to act on the evidence is an insult to all freedom-loving Americans and constitutes a willful and blatant abrogation of your constitutional duties. Mr. Gallegly, you and your colleagues disgrace yourself! You and your congressional colleagues do not deserve the trust of the American people and quite frankly should not be allowed to continue masquerading as servants of the people!
Let’s be blunt Mr. Gallegly, the government is corrupt to the core and the willingness of Congress to obfuscate, lie and distort the truth as it pertains to Obama’s usurpation of the presidency will not be allowed by those who cherish individual freedoms and the right to pursue peace and tranquility in their daily lives. We the people have had enough of the rot that pervades the government.
The “Obama” eligibility issue is not one that you can conveniently ignore by sending out form letters or by telling constituents that you think “Obama” is constitutionally qualified or by hiding behind a CRS report that was generated for the sole purpose of bamboozling the American public and providing cover for your pathetic careers. No sir, this is about upholding the Constitution and doing what is morally and ethically right. It is about preserving America’s values and protecting our freedom and liberty. Mr. Gallegly, you have a constitutional and moral obligation to speak up now and demand a formal congressional investigation of AKA Obama. Nothing less is acceptable.
Mr. Gallegly, you and the rest of the self-serving politicians in Congress work for me and my fellow Americans. ALL of you in Congress have a responsibility to provide me and my fellow citizen’s answers to these critical questions and issues. You swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution. It’s time you took that oath very seriously!
To recap, let me make this abundantly clear for you Mr. Gallegly. We have a man in the white house who has facilitated a bloodless coup of the government of the United States! He is now systematically destroying the country as he ignores and disrespects the Constitution at every turn. With your help and the help of every member of Congress who has chosen to look the other way you are contributing to the decline of our nation. As a consequence of YOUR inaction, the American people are rapidly losing their freedom.
Mr. Gallegly, as a constituent of your district I demand that you respond to this letter and address the ongoing corruption within the Obama administration. I believe that a honest and thorough congressional investigation, utilizing the subpoena power and the authority of the FBI will quickly reveal that the individual known to the American people as Barack Hussein Obama has committed at a minimum the following crimes:
Usurpation of the presidency in addition to identity fraud, election fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy, voter fraud including voter intimidation, violation of bankruptcy laws, real estate fraud, voter discrimination, perjury, forgery, bribery, attempted bribery, violation of Whistle Blower law, misrepresentation, abuse of power, violation of the 14th amendment, violation of court orders, obstruction of justice, violation of the War Powers Act, ongoing violations of basic constitutional responsibilities and continued lying to the American people.
Mr. Gallegly, if I can figure out all this, why can’t you? The better question of course is why you and your fellow congresspersons continue to look the other way? What are you afraid of Mr. Gallegly? What are you waiting for? When are you going to do something about it?
Forget about politics Mr. Gallegly and direct your attention to the rule of law; i.e., compliance with the Constitution of the United States. Do what is moral; do what is just and right. Uphold your sworn duty and protect the Constitution; for all freedom-loving Americans!
I call upon you Mr. Gallegly to exhibit the integrity, decency, honesty and moral courage necessary to speak out and demand forthwith a full and complete investigation of the domestic enemy currently controlling our government. Nothing less is acceptable.
Gary Wilmott, Simi Valley, CA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)