Saturday, July 31, 2010
Some of Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama Soetoro's Passport Application Records Are Released due to Strunk FOIA Filing
Some of Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama Soetoro's
Passport Application Records Are Released due to Strunk FOIA Filing

Passport file analysis, comments, and more new questions

Posted By: CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Posted: 31 Jul 2010 - Last Update: 01 Aug 2010 11 p.m.

Some Stanley Ann Dunham passport file documents are finally released after over a year and a half of Mr. Christopher Earl Strunk requesting and then suing to get the information released in the Strunk vs Dept of State FOIA case. This information should have been been released long ago per his initial FOIA request filed back in Oct 2008. But as with everything with Mr. Obama and his early life, the cover up is maintained as long as possible and then when the files are released things that should be there are missing. It required a federal lawsuit to even get them to release even these documents.

The passport services official says in the cover letter that the some earlier passport application records noted in subsequent filings could not be found. Any possible 1960/1961 passport application paper work information that has been postulated by researchers studying Obama's early life narrative is missing from this released information. The link to any earlier passport application filed in the early 60s would have been shown in the passport application filed in 1965. But conveniently, the 1965 passport application paper work for a known passport issued on July 19, 1965 is missing. How convenient that key pieces of information about Obama and his family's early life always turns up missing! This reminds me of the missing page in the Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama 1964 divorce file.

Why I believe the July 19, 1965 issued passport was issued pursuant to a passport renewal application filed in 1965 for a prior passport that was expiring and that it was not the first passport that Stanley Ann Dunham had. The issue date in July 19, 1965 is four months after her marriage to Lolo Soetoro on March 15, 1965. If she had applied for her first passport in the late spring or early summer of 1965 she would have had to legally apply for it in her married name, Stanley Ann Soetoro. The July 19, 1965 issued passport was not in her married name since she had to AMEND it in 1967 and show her marriage license to get her married name put on her passport at that time. That is what the 1967 document states. And secondly, I believe it was a passport renewal application in 1965, because Obama's family in Kenya says Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama was there when Obama was born and government officials in Kenya state Obama was born there. Stanley Ann would have needed a passport in 1961 to get to Kenya and back to the USA. Since the 1965 passport was not in her 2nd marriage name when it was issued 4 months after her marriage to Lolo Soetoro, it is obvious to me she simply renewed her previously issued circa early 1961 original passport which was in either her maiden name or in the name of her first marriage name of Stanley Ann Obama, if issued after Feb 1961 when she is said to have married Barack Hussein Obama Sr.

The copies of documents in what was released per the FOIA request are numbered but not in chronological order. This makes reading the file and the flow of events over time more difficult unless one prints out the file and rearranges the docs in chronological order, which I did.

There is a document numbered P3 which is an application for amendment of her existing passport. This amendment request was apparently done in 1967 (per a handwritten clerk's name and date note on it since the date is not filled in below Stanley Ann's signature on the form). This handwritten annotated note and date was apparently done by a clerk seeing a marriage license in order to process the request to amend a passport issued on July 19, 1965. But the copy of that 1965 passport application is not provided in this FOIA request. The passport officials say it could not be found. Why? That 1965 passport was issued several months after she married Lolo Soetoro. She filed the amendment apparently in 1967 allegedly to have it reflect her married name due to her name change after marrying Lolo Soetoro at Molokai Hawaii on March 15, 1965 per page marked P3 of the released documents. Thus the conveniently missing application records for this 1965 passport implies to me that that there was something indicated in it that the powers to be did not want the public to see, i.e., that she had a passport prior to 1965 and the 1965 records indicated it was a Renewal application. So someone made the 1965 application records disappear. The carefully worded cover letter with the FOIA release implies to me that earlier years records have been purged by someone at sometime for some reason since they could not find a record that should be there based on records they did find. Was the 1965 passport issued done per a renewal request for a prior issued passport? As to the implication in the cover letter that early year data may have been cleaned out due to some records retention cut off date. I don't buy that. Since passport records are filed in files by name and not in boxes or files by year, this does not make sense. I was under the impression that passport records kept and filed by name were kept virtually forever. That wording sounded to me like bureaucratic obfuscation. It sounds to me like HI officials (or whoever controls them) are now instructing the U.S. Passport Office how to obfuscate and parse sentences in cover letters to allow them to not provide what one asks for and yet not be lying. In my opinion, there was probably a passport issued to Stanley Ann (whatever name she used to get it) prior to 1965. The 1965 passport application record pointed to that. So someone made the 1965 application records disappear.

Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro-Passport Application File-Strunk v Dept of State-FOIA Release-FINAL-7-29-10. This file indicates via the 1967 passport amendment application (document marked P3) that Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama had a passport for certain issued to her 1965 and she was applying to amend it. Thus she had one for sure in 1965. Since her originally issued passport was good for up to 5 years, that means if the 1965 issued passport was a reissue of a passport to replace the original one that she had, but which was expiring, then she likely got her first passport possibly as early as late 1960 or early 1961.

How does all this fit the narrative to explain the information coming out of Africa and Kenya that Obama was born there? Why would she need a passport at age 18? She would not need it to have a baby in Hawaii or to go to college in Seattle Washington and back and forth to home in Hawaii. What was the real reason this pregnant 18 year old teenager got a passport in late 1960 or early in 1961? I believe it was likely to be able to travel to Kenya to have the baby over there where it was her intent to leave the baby there to be raised by the paternal family in Kenya. She was to then return to re-start her life as a young teenager going to college in Seattle Washington. And then when Stanley Ann did not follow the plan because maternal instincts kicked in and she returned to college in Seattle WITH the new baby, grandma Dunham had to take action and filed the fraudulent action in Hawaii to falsely register the baby as born at home there in Hawaii, with no witnesses, to get her newborn grandson U.S. Citizenship ... because it was very easy to do this in Hawaii in 1961. Listen to the Bill Cunningham Radio Show for how it was likely done: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmZpwcRf3FQ

Also in this passport applications file is revealed the exact date of Stanley Ann's marriage (two different exact dates and locations?) to Lolo Soetoro. But as is typical for everything with this family, nothing is consistent. In the 1967 amendment filing marked P3 she says she married Lolo Soetoro on March 15, 1965 in Molokai Hawaii. But in a later passport renewal application marked P5 filed in 1981 she states she married him on March 5, 1964 in Maui, Hawaii. Which is true? Either way, said marriage dates could have allowed for Obama to have been legally adopted by Lolo Soetoro in Hawaii at age 5 or under, given either of these marriage dates. And in addition, his falsified birth records in Hawaii, fraudulently created by grandma Dunham in 1961, could have been amended to show the new legal name of Barry Soetoro. Obama was mentioned as a son over age 18 in the Soetoro 1980 Divorce file as a dependent of Lolo Soetoro and still receiving financial aid from Lolo Soetoro to attend college. And then later in life as an adult Obama could have amended his vital record in Hawaii again and changed his name back to Barack Hussein Obama II when at that time in his life that name suited him. Obama is a life narrative chameleon. He changes names and citizenship at will during his life to suit his current needs and plans.

Also on document P1 signed in 1968, the second page of that document, she wrote in the block named "Amend to Include (Exclude) Children" the name of her son Barack Hussein Obama and then right below it a weird name or phrase spelled and in parenthesis as (Soebarkah). This entry then has 5 diagonal line strike-through lines across the entry. Another mysterious new tidbit and question as to the meaning of that entry to research.

When the original and complete birth records file for Obama in Hawaii going back to and including Aug 1961, and all subsequent amendments are released, it will likely be very damning to Obama's self created nativity narrative and other stories of his early life. Children legally adopted at age 5 and under have their new citizenship governed by the international Hague Convention Treaty on adopting children. The United States is a signatory to that treaty. That is another likely reason why Obama alludes to his being age 6 when those Indonesian records are discussed in regards to when his step-father "adopted" him and saying that the adoption occurred in Indonesia. I think that story is more false direction and misinformation type data put out by Obama and his handlers to throw one off the true trail.

See the records that have been released per the Strunk FOIA request and court order at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/35161730/Stanley-Ann-Dunham-Obama-Soetoro-Passport-Application-File-Strunk-v-Dept-of-State-FOIA-Release-FINAL-7-29-10

Posted by:

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al
Please visit this website and help the cause if you can:
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####

P.S. Also released via another FOIA request were the U.S. records of her second husband Lolo Seotoro (parts of this file have been redacted/blacked out). This file contains a very poor quality copy of the March 1965 marriage license of Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama to Lolo Soetoro, her 2nd husband, and Obama's step-father in Indonesia. http://www.scribd.com/doc/35189898/Lolo-Soetoro-U-S-Records-Allen-v-DHS-State-and-Allen-v-USCIS-FOIA-Releases-Final-7-29-10

P.P.S. Close reading of the marriage license of Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama to Lolo Soetoro in March 1965 reveals that they were married in the state of Hawaii in Molokai in the county of Maui on the 15th of March, 1965. http://www.scribd.com/doc/35197608/Stanley-Ann-Dunham-Obama-Lolo-Soetoro-Marriage-License-Mar-1965-From-Soetoro-FOIA-Released-Docs

P.P.P.S. See this link sent to me about passport records retention:
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/96122.pdf
####

02 Aug 2010: An interesting observation to note about that new name for Barack Hussein Obama found written on the 2nd page of document numbered P1 is that the first three letters of that name Soebarkah, i.e., 'Soe' are also the first three letters of Lolo Soetoro's last name, i.e., 'Soe'. Lolo Soetore allegedly legally adopted Barack and changed Barack's name to Barry Soetoro after Lolo married Obama's mother Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama on 15 March 1965 in Hawaii. Where and exactly when did the legal adoption and name change occur, in Hawaii under U.S. law or in Indonesian under their laws, no one knows for certain at this point? More questions to answer about the mystery man in the Oval Office.
####
Posted by cfkerchner at 1:13 PM
Labels: ann, Application, Apuzzo, Christoper, congress, dunham, File, FOIA, Kerchner, lawsuit, mother, Obama, passport, president, Saebarkah, Soebarkah, soetoro, Stanley, Strunk, usurper
34 comments:

Guy4013 said...

I believe there is a court order by a CA judge to have released the Dunham's records. The DHS has refused to release the records even under a Court order.

One question is: Was Dunham really in Hawaii in 1961?

It's very convenient that the 1960-1964 records are somehow missing and there is not an answer to where Dunham was in 1960-1961.
July 31, 2010 2:41 PM
Guy4013 said...

As an additional comment on my previous comment:

The Ca case is Allen v Soetoro now on appeal in 9th Circuit.

The government appears unwilling to release the ordered records.
July 31, 2010 2:45 PM
jayjay said...

It's really no wonder that the government doesn't want to release ANYTHING about anyone in the family since what HAS been releases certainly establishes that the entire bunch are nothing but a bunch of serial liars and perjurers.

Barry's mama lies in her passport paperwork (the parts that ARE available). She states in her '65passpoet application that she married Soetoro March 15, 1965 on Moloki and in her '81 application she says they were married March 5, 1964. Whoa, Nellie!!

Nothing like a few "little fibs" to liven up your life story, right??? Guess Narry learned that from his family alongs with Communism/Muslim teachings?

And that's just from casual inspection. Good find.
July 31, 2010 3:48 PM
jayjay said...

Moreover - why would mama even NEED a passport prior to 1965 whern she married Soetoro and moved to Indonesia??? After all - presumably according to all the Obama-protectors - she stayed in HI through 61 and later until 65 when she left for Indonsesia. The fact that there WAS an earlier passport would mean she went somewhere out of the US pre 65. Now WHERE might that have been???

The fact that the passport has evaporated is even more odd ... and suspicious. They are ALL a bunch of scofflaws and frauds more than happy to break the law at the drop of a hat because they all hated the US.

And note that on returning to the US from Indonesia she had to file for an "exception". Was this because she then had Indonesian citizenship or dual citizenship???
July 31, 2010 4:51 PM
jayjay said...

Barry would have been less than 6 years old based upon the passport statements when taken to Indonesia in that mom and new-poppa were "married" (if any) when he was taken to Jakarta - even with the latest marriage date of the two.

That would I believe make him Indonesian and a Muslim as well. Would Barry/his mom/his grandparents/etc. lie??? Yep - sure would.
July 31, 2010 6:12 PM
Joe said...

Someone whose name begins with a D needs to request their passport records from 1960-61 asap.

Perhaps the officials who signed these are still around.

Why is the first app signed on Aug. 13th 1968?

I think this is all Allen will get. If he wants to get the rest, he may have to allege that the State Dept. is lying about not having the first record. It just doesn't make sense.

It shouldn't take a year and 9 months to get records that are allowed to be given under the law.
July 31, 2010 8:07 PM
Robert said...

While it is easy to get caught up in all of the intrigue prevalent via revelations such as this it is critical for everyone to acknowledge that the burden of proof remains upon Mr. Obama.

Mr. Obama's lack of documentation only bolsters the claim that he is not a natural born citizen and has not qualified for the office of the president.
July 31, 2010 9:15 PM
John Smith said...

The text of the Constitution excludes Obama from eligibility. We know he was born British no matter where in the universe he was born, because his father was a British Kenyan.

The Constitution created the presidency, and tests the president's exclusive loyalty to it twice: in the oath of office requirement and in the natural born citizen requirement. Both require exclusive allegiance to the government of the Constitution, NOT just simply to the country.

Perhaps natural born Citizens of the United States must be born in the United States, but not all people born in the United States are natural born Citizens of the Untied States.

Perhaps natural born Citizens of the United States must be citizens of the United States from the moment of birth, but not all people who are citizens of the United States from the moment of birth are natural born Citizens of the United States.

Americans have been fooled into believing that a natural born Citizen is one who is born exclusively in the United States or who is a US citizen from birth. But there are many people born in the US whom the Constitution found a reason to excuse from the NBC requirement, namely those who were citizens of the US at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. Why would the Constitution find a reason to excuse them from having to be NBC if they were already NBC? The reason is that they were not born in the exclusive jurisdiction of the government established by the Constitution. That is, they were born in the US under the government of the Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union.

There were no natural born Citizens of the United States for the purposes of eligibility to the presidency, as described by the Constitution, until after the adoption of the Constitution because said natural born Citizen must not share birth-related allegiance, jurisdiction, loyalty, or animosity to any other GOVERNMENT.

NBC is government-focused, not country-focused. The text of the Constitution itself, in solo, supports this theory and excludes Obama, without reliance on the opinion of others.
July 31, 2010 9:46 PM
cfkerchner said...

A tipster just sent me this. They said that in this linked to government regulation that passport files and records must be retained for 100 years. Here is the link so we all can read it together. If so, then that FOIA letter misstated the law on records retention for passport files. Possibly someone sanitized Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro's passport file via a "break in" like was done to Obama's file that subsequently resulted in someone involved with that passport-gate caper being shot and that crime never solved. Maybe that contract worker got to Stanly Ann's file and did the dirty deed of sanitizing it of early damaging records before he attempted to crack into Obama's file.

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/96122.pdf

CDR Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org
July 31, 2010 10:34 PM
bdwilcox said...

I love you guys as I love Orly Taitz (and Leo Donofrio when he was in the game) for putting it all on the line for your country. You're doing a great service to this nation and to its citizens for the work you're currently engaged in.

But I feel you're all chasing ghosts. You keep trying to put together the pieces of a puzzle that never existed. This guy's past is a narrative that's been written by many people; this is why you keep coming upon these discrepancies like you're finding now.

Before you can speculate on the ins and outs of Obama's history, you need to answer the most fundamental question: Is Stanley Dunham actually Obama's mother? Everything about this specter's past is a carefully manufactured lie, why not his mother as well?

You said: Obama is a life narrative chameleon. He changes names and citizenship at will during his life to suit his current needs and plans.
This isn't an answer so much as a question. That question is: Is it Obama that keeps changing narratives or is it someone changing it for him, and if so, who? That is the real question.
July 31, 2010 11:23 PM
No-Bot said...

P1, dated 1968, says Dunham Obama Soetoro was "Now Residing At: Djakarta, Indonesia."

P2, dated 1972, says Dunham Obama Soetoro's PROPOSED LENGTH OF STAY in Indonesia was INDEFINITE.


On the back side of P5 (script p. 11 of 14), it says:

"I INTEND TO CONTINUE TO RESIDE ABROAD FOR THE FOLLOWING PERIOD AND PURPOSE

Two years contract with Ford Foundation from January 1981 - December 1982."

Barry Soetoro traveled to Pakistan (and probably Indonesia) in 1982.

Dunham Obama Soetoro filed the Soetoro divorce complaint IN HAWAII on August 20, 1980. The divorce was GRANTED on August 28, 1980.

The divorce complaint does not mention the date or location of the alleged marriage.

P6 says Dunham Obama Soetoro was still in Indonesia in 1986, four years after the Ford Foundation jig was up. So far, we have Dunham Obama Soetoro, an alleged U.S. citizen, living in Indonesia from, at least, 1968 to, at least, 1986.

On P1, dated 1968, and on P2, dated 1972, Dunham Obama Soetoro says to contact Stanley Armour Dunham, not Lolo Soetoro, in case of emergency. In fact, Lolo was a no-show.

One document (waiver) is signed by Leonard Soon, Immigration Officer. I located him in public data bases.

Alfred Harding IV, Foreign Service Officer, signed P4 of the document, died in 2006.

While there are divorce records for Dunham Obama Soetoro, no one has a located publicly available marriage license(s).
July 31, 2010 11:26 PM
Robert said...

"The established retention period for electronic records in PRISM is presently 100 years..."

The 100 years applies to electronic records retention. The passport records could have been paper records at the time they were allegedly destroyed.

The National Archives states on its website: "Passport applications can be an excellent source of genealogical information, especially about foreign-born individuals. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) has passport applications from Oct. 1795-Mar. 1925; the U.S. Department of State has passport applications from Apr. 1925 to the present."

If Ann's passport records were destroyed, then how do you explain the National Archives stating, "the U.S. Department of State has passport applications from Apr. 1925 to the present."
July 31, 2010 11:31 PM
No-Bot said...
This post has been removed by the author.
July 31, 2010 11:33 PM
Robert said...

One more thing:

http://travel.state.gov/passport/services/copies/copies_872.html states:

"Passport Records for Issuances 1925 – Present
Requesting Your Own Record
Passport Services maintains United States passport records for passports issued from 1925 to the present."

It doesn't sound like such records have ever been destroyed.
July 31, 2010 11:35 PM
No-Bot said...
This post has been removed by the author.
July 31, 2010 11:37 PM
No-Bot said...
This post has been removed by the author.
July 31, 2010 11:43 PM
Joe said...

Heck for that matter,
where is her marriage certificate with Barack sr. ?

Why would that be secret? Why would that be withheld when both have passed?
August 1, 2010 12:04 AM
No-Bot said...

The Washington Post article (link above) says Harding served in Indonesia during the period Dunham Obama Soetoro traveled there:

Mr. Harding also served in Hong Kong and Indonesia in the 1960s and 1970s. From 1972 to 1975, he was based in Washington and helped establish cultural links between China and the United States. He was the State Department's Freedom of Information officer from 1977 until his retirement in 1979.

Harding signed P4 in 1976, a period that is unaccounted for in this obit.
August 1, 2010 12:05 AM
No-Bot said...
This post has been removed by the author.
August 1, 2010 12:59 AM
Michael-Is-Great said...

When on earth are you going to be allowed by the Judicial System to get the proofs needed to prove that Obama is nothing less than a fraudulent president of the USA who was simply not eligible under the Constitution of the USA?
When?

This "no standing" story is a little bit too easy to throw at those who put cases in court. When this travesty of justice is going to last once and for all?
August 1, 2010 2:18 AM
avodlp said...

Wasn't Stanley Ann D. in Beirut, Lebanon circa 1953-54; attending the Collège Notre-Dame de Jamhour?
August 1, 2010 2:29 AM
A pen said...

I think I discovered why archived originals can't be located. From NARA; Does NARA lend original documents for research?

NARA does not lend original documents for research use.

Originating Federal agencies or successors in function; courts; and the President, Vice President, former Presidents or Vice Presidents or donors, or their designated representative may request loans of their own original holdings for the conduct of official business.
www.archives.gov/faqs/

There will be a record showing who applied to remove those originals though. I suspect the collection of documents with evidence of who Obama/ Soetoro really is have been removed under the guise of permanent relocation in a presidential museum where they can be hidden permanently from public view by the curator.
August 1, 2010 6:42 AM
A pen said...

The reason for the "amended to include/ exclude children" entry was because the child was on the prior passport. Also in 1978 Carter signed Pub.L. 95-432 www.richw.org/dualcit/law.html which supposedly prospectively removed retention requirements of certain parents whose children were born abroad and in Obamas' case it might apply. I was however under the impression that congress shall make no law ex post facto, which this public law appears to be.

All taken together this man is a problem of the highest order since he has somehow come to be where he is by miraculously entering every crack and crevice in law. Is it luck or was this path researched and planned simply to obfuscate his true origin and purpose?
August 1, 2010 8:56 AM
Born912 said...

Two issues: 1 this FOIA release comes just a week before Ken Allen’s next FOIA court action Aug 5th. Coincidence? 2.The passport data was likely scanned and saved in electronic format sometime in the past 10 years. If so it had to be purged from the database and from the backup copies. DBAs loathe purging data of selected records, and such purging leaves a trail that another DBA could find. Typically purging from the backup tapes never happens as it is too much trouble to find and load the tape backup (kept off site), purge and create new tapes sans a selected record. I would expect the entire tape to be missing for that section of data. Something to consider.
August 1, 2010 10:32 AM
Joe said...

I was able to get the record of, a child born abroad in 1971, in 2005.

I guess Barry is not the only one with a document problem, it appears to run in the family.

What are the chances of the government loosing 2 marriage certificates and 1 divorce record of one woman.
August 1, 2010 10:39 AM
Joe said...

Marriage and divorce records are required in life for certain things along the way.

Sorry, Barack, but I don't think your mom ever married your father. I realize that must be embarrassing as a President but it also makes you the product of our new unwed society.
August 1, 2010 10:46 AM
No-Bot said...
This post has been removed by the author.
August 1, 2010 1:21 PM
Robert said...

We are currently at great risk of losing our constitutional republic through blatant disregard for the rule of law. If so, we won't be the first.

We must learn and teach the lessons of history.

Please review the following link and pass on as you wish.

http://www.flixxy.com/political-systems.htm
August 1, 2010 2:44 PM
Let us move forward said...

Note that Stanley Ann never includes Obama in her name in these passport filings, not even in the other names known by. In her correspondence with the Immigration official John F. O'Shea, pleading hardship to keep Lolo in the United States based on her mental anguish, Barry is referred to only as her son by a previous marriage; she never offers Obama as the name of her former husband.

In the document P1 on the second page, Barack Hussein Obama is written under Include (Exclude) Children and then crossed out. Note the hand in which his name is written and compare it to the hand on page 1. The latter is Stanley Ann's hand, nearly child like printing in form and the bottom edges of the Cap letters in the open box are not aligned. Indefinite is misspelled as "indefinate" (a spelling which is overwritten in a later document). The former hand (the "son's name") is very precise and even. It is written in all Caps, first letter larger, where her name entries were Caps first letter, other letters small. The "sons name" appears to have been written by someone else. The question is who and when. Might want to compare the printing to a current sample of Mr. Obama's.

Being denied the 1965 passport application, we cannot confirm that Stanley Ann's son by a previous marriage was called Barack Hussein Obama in 1965. This name was not used on his Indonesian school record.

P.S. I will use this post to confirm that I can still post here. I will send this information to Allen.
August 2, 2010 1:10 PM
cfkerchner said...

To 8x8:

To contact Mario Apuzzo send him email at this address with the proper @ symbol in of the [at] and spaces. Put something germane in the subject line:

apuzzo [at] erols.com

To contact me, use the Contact button at:

http://www.protectourliberty.org
August 2, 2010 1:55 PM
cfkerchner said...

Hi all,

Re. by CDR Kerchner (Ret)
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/07/some-of-stanley-ann-dunham-obama.html

and ...

Re. by Dr. Corsi
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=186677

I noticed in the WND.com article by Dr. Corsi he has spelled the new name found for Barack Hussein Obama (BHO) as 'Saebarkah'. In my blog post I pointed out that it looked like 'Soebarkah' to me. I just looked at it again under a magnifying glass and it is clearly spelled to me as 'Soebarkah' with an 'o' and is definitely not an 'a' after the S.

If researchers are going to look for this new BHO name in Indonesian and other records, they will have to spell it right or at least both ways if there is some dispute as to the way it should be spelled in Indonesia. But on the second page of document numbered P1, the name with the strike out lines through it, that name looks clearly spelled to me as 'Soebarkah'.

An interesting observation to note is that the first three letters 'Soe' are also the first three letters of Lolo Soetoro's last name, i.e., 'Soe'.

Please check the file yourself and if you all agree it's an 'o' and not an 'a', please correct people on the net as to the correct spelling as observed in that passport records document.

We all know that the Soetoro name has been spelled many ways in Stanley Ann's and Barry's (aka Steve's) life. So beware of that too. She may have spelled Soebarkah different ways in other places.

Here is where the file can be found so you can view the name yourself. Print it out for easier study.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/35161730/Stanley-Ann-Dunham-Obama-Soetoro-Passport-Application-File-Strunk-v-Dept-of-State-FOIA-Release-FINAL-7-29-10

Feel free to cut and paste this and pass it along to other sites.

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://puzo1.blogspot.com
####
August 2, 2010 6:25 PM
cfkerchner said...

Editor's note: This was posted by Bob Strauss in another thread. I am cross posting it here into the Dunham passport FOIA release thread FYI.

-----------------------
Pete // August 2, 2010 at 7:53 am

>>>Georgetown posted:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35189898/Lolo-Soetoro-U-S-Records-Allen-v-DHS-State-and-Allen-v-USCIS-FOIA-Releases-Final-7-29-10<<<

Georgetown,
Everything about the 'child' that doesn't say he was a US citizen by birth has been redacted. Some of the documents are illegible. The portions concerning Barry Obama that have been redacted, I'm sure were very important. That means they took the time to hide evidence.

Pete
----------------------
August 2, 2010 7:32 PM
jayjay said...

Another thing that seems odd is the place of marriage of Stanley & Lolo (if any) ... you almost always have to assume the "if any" modifier with anything Obama & relativess or hangers-on due to their untruthfulness on almost everything as dictated by their current needs.

The island of Molokai is in the county of Maui and, in fact is the island where Father Damien ministered to the lepers at the colony there on the north shore. This colony was segregated by law with access highly restricted until 1969. It seems exceedingly strange that Stanley & Lolo would choose to be married on this island since aside from the isolated leper colony there are very few towns of any size.

My belief?? I think that this "marriage" is as likely as the "marriage" (on Maui - presumably the island rather than the county) of Stanley & Barack Sr ... meaning that there was none unless documentart proof can be found. It would certainly fit the "who needs to follow laws" lifes of these folks.
August 3, 2010 9:02 AM
don said...

The name "Soebarkah" in parentheses seems like an after-thought by the mother. It doesn't fit in the box. She probably included it because it's a renewal application and she wanted the person processing the application to know it's the same child she listed on her earlier application from 1965. In other words, in the earlier application which is conveniently missing, he is probably listed with the Soebarkah surname. If that's the case, that would suggest the possibility that his real birth certificate might be listed under Soebarkah in whatever country he was truly born in.
August 3, 2010 10:10 PM

Post a Comment
Links to this post

Stanley Ann Dunham/Obama/Soetoro Passport Records Released ...
Updating : WHY DID STANLEY ANN SOETORO DUNHAM HAVE TWO DIFFERENT MARRIAGE DATES ON HER PASSPORTS APPS? ObamaRelease YourRecords. Updated 8/1 - Breaking News - 31 July 2010 - For Immediate Release - Some of Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama ...
Posted by David Crockett at August 2, 2010 12:48 PM

Create a Link
Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Bocca Della Verita ~ Mario Apuzzo Esq
Bocca Della Verita ~ Mario Apuzzo Esq
I enjoy the universe of ideas and a sound mind and body. Mario Apuzzo, Esq., 185 Gatzmer Avenue Jamesburg NJ 08831, Email: apuzzo[AT]erols.com, TEL: 732-521-1900 • FAX: 732-521-3906, BLOG: http://puzo1.blogspot.com
• Summary of Latest Court Activity - Kerchner v Obama & Congress
• Appeal Docket Report - Kerchner v Obama & Congress
• Summary of Lawsuit/Complaint and Link to the Complaint and Counts/Charges
• Law of Nations - The Legal Book Used by the Founders & Framers to Write the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution to Unite the 13 Free & Independent Sovereign States into a More Perfect Union
• Obama - Maybe a Citizen of the United States but Not a "natural born Citizen" of the United States
• Natural Born Citizenship Requires Both Parents to be U.S. Citizens
• A Catalog of Evidence - Concerned Americans Have Good Reason to Doubt that Putative President Obama Was Born in Hawaii
• Article II 'natural born Citizenship' Means Unity of Citizenship at Birth
• The Law of Nations & Natural Law is U.S. Federal Common Law on "natural born Citizenship"
• An Article II "natural born Citizen" is Not the Same as an English Common Law "natural born Subject"
• Obama When Born in 1961 Was a British Subject as Was His Father and Obama is Still a British Protected Person and Citizen to This Day
• Neither the 14th Amendment Ratified in 1868 nor the Wong Kim Ark decision in 1898 makes Any Person a "natural born Citizen". Those acts and laws create "Citizens of the U.S." but NOT "natural born Citizens of the U.S."
• Why the "natural born Citizen" Clause of Our Constitution is Important and Worth Preserving
• What is Putative President Obama's Current U.S. Citizenship Status?
• Obama's Lack of Constitutional Eligibility - The 3 Enablers
• HR 1503 Pres Candidates Constitutional Eligibility Docs Bill for Future Elections Now Has 12 Signers
• AZ HB 2441 - State of AZ Presidential Constitutional Eligibility Verificaton Bill with Numerous Sponsors
• SC Bill 3389 - State of SC Requires Conclusive Proof of Natural Born Citizenship Status for Pres Elections
• NH Bill 1245 - State of NH Bill Says No More Hidden BC Records

• The Blog Rules-Please Read
• Read Atty Apuzzo's Writings/Briefs @ SCRIBD.com
• How You Can Help the Cause
SCRIBD Links to Obtain Court Docs Filed

* Kerchner v Obama & Congress - All Court Documents - At Apuzzo's SCRIBD Account
* DOCKET REPORT - Kerchner v Obama & Congress - Appeals Court - Philadelphia PA
* DOCKET REPORT - Kerchner v Obama & Congress - District Court - Camden NJ
* Table of Contents for Kerchner v Obama & Congress 2nd Amended Complaint Served on the Defendants
* The Lawsuit - Kerchner et al v Obama et al: Initial filing 2:50 a.m. 20 Jan 2009. Second Amended Verified Complaint Filed 9 Feb 2009.

Useful Info, Docs, & Videos

* Learn What is America's True Form of Government
* Five Citizenship Terms Used in Constitution
* Euler Logic Diagram Analysis of Natural Born Citizenship Term In Article II of U.S. Constitution
* Natural Born Citizen Graphics - A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words.
* What is a Natural Born Citizen?
* Exactly What is a Natural Born Citizen? - Very Good Video.
* See How Easy it is to Produce a Phony Certification of Live Birth (COLB) and a Digital Image & Picture of Same and Put it Online.
* Here is one for Mickey Hussein Mouse II. Such a digital image is all that Obama has given to the electorate and public to support his claim of birth in the USA.
* Analysis of Obama's Certification of Live Birth (COLB) and Examples of Other Type Birth Records by syc1959.
* Analysis of Obama's Certification of Live Birth (COLB) by Ron Polarik, PhD.
* The Greatest Birth Certificate Fraud in History - Obama's Forged Online Certification of Live Birth - How It Was Done

Search This Blog


powered by

Time Since the Usurper Putative President Obama aka Barry Soetoro Unconstitutionally Took Office
562 Days, 03 Hours, 43 Minutes, 11 Seconds
Radio Interviews

* Les Naiman Show-970 WGTK Louisville KY-May10
* Jeff Kuhner Show-570 WTNT Wash DC-Apr10
* Bill Cunningham Show-700 WLW Cincinnati OH-Sep09
* Sean & Frank Show-680 WCBM Baltimore MD-Jun09
* AndreaSheaKingShow-BlogTalkRadio-Jan10
* AndreaSheaKingShow-BlogTalkRadio-Oct09
* AndreaSheaKingShow-BlogTalkRadio-Jun09
* ChaliceShow-BlogTalkRadio-Jul09
* DrKateConstitutionalRadio-BlogTalkRadio-Aug09
* DrKateRevolutionRadio-BlogTalkRadio-Jan10
* MommaeRadioRebels-BlogTalkRadio-Oct09
* MommaeRadioRebels-BlogTalkRadio-Jul09

Print Media Announcements and Advertorials

* How to Help Place More Print Media Insertions
* Obama Is A Usurper - Illegal President - 02 Aug 2010 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly
* Kenya My Country, Tussker My Beer - 26, 19, & 12 Jul 2010 issues Wash Times Natl Wkly
* Hawaii 2008 Sr Elections Clerk, Tim Adams, Says Obama Not Born in Hawaii - 5 Jul, 21 Jun, & 28 Jun 2010 Issues Wash Times Natl Wkly
* Obama's Lack of Eligibility - The Three Enablers of the Cone of Silence in Washington DC - 31 & 24 May 2010 Issue Wash Times Natl Wkly
* Ministers in Kenyan National Assembly - Obama "born here in Kenya" - "not native American" - "should repatriate himself to Kenya" - 17 & 10 May 2010 Issues Wash Times Natl Wkly
* Advertising Archives - See prior ads

Some Informative Websites & Forums

* American Thinker Website
* Atlas Shrugs
* Betrayal Blog - Oil For Immigration
* Birthers Website
* Canada Free Press
* Citizen Wells Blog
* Cloward-Piven Strategy of Manufactured and Orchestrated Crisis
* Conservative Monster
* Dr Kate's View Blog
* Drudge Report
* He's Not My President Blog- The NBC Book
* Investigating Obama
* Jefferson Rebels Blog
* New Zeal Blog
* NoBarack08's WebBlog
* Obama Citizenship Facts
* Obama File Website
* Obama Release Your Records Blog
* Obama Timeline 1961-2009
* Pajamas TV
* Patriot Radio's Blog by Andrea Shea King
* Post & Email Website
* Protect Our Liberty
* Right Side of Life Website
* Stand Up America Blog
* Tea Party Patriots
* The Daily Caller
* Western Center for Journalism
* Why Obama Will Not Show His Real Birth Certificate
* World Net Daily Website

The Rules
THE RULES: Please keep in mind this is a moderated blog. This is akin to a court setting and is not a wide open say anything you want, anytime you want, free speech zone like a soap box in a public square. If you want that type of forum you will have to go elsewhere. Keep your comments and questions in the case threads serious and focused on the subject and merits of this case. Unsubstantiated statements which are determined to be false and misleading, or even potentially misleading to others (the jury of public opinion reading this blog) as to the true facts of this case, repetitive, argumentative, personal attacks, criticism or lobbying efforts for other attorneys and/or their cases, blog scrolling, advertising links, inappropriate links, disinformation campaigns, and/or off topic comments will likely not be posted. I also will not discuss in public specifics of the case as to my planned tactics or strategies for pursuing this case. That will be only be revealed at the appropriate time in subsequent court filings and in the hearings or trial. I am the Judge in this blog and will rule on the merits, materiality, worthiness, etc., of all comments. My rulings on the acceptance or rejection of a comment are final. Please note that your comments will not appear immediately as I have to review them first. As I am busy working on this case, and other cases with my law office, it may be several hours to 1/2 a day at times before your comment is reviewed and accepted and/or answered. Mr. Kerchner at times assists me as a moderator and editor. Thank you for your kind consideration of the purpose of the blog posts about the Obama Article II eligibility issue and the Kerchner vs. Obama & Congress case and for your comments.

Blog Archive

* ▼ 2010 (70)
o ► August (2)
+ Republicans Want Review of Birthright Citizenship ...
+ Newest Ad - Obama Is A Usurper & Illegal President...
o ▼ July (6)
+ Some of Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama Soetoro's Passp...
+ Dr Polland charges in his videos that Identity, El...
+ The Third Circuit Court of Appeals Finds Attorney ...
+ The Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al Appeal ...
+ Ad-Kenya My Country, Tussker My Beer-The Elephant ...
+ The Third Circuit Court of Appeals Affirms the Dis...
o ► June (11)
+ The U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Receives K...
+ The Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al Appeal ...
+ Two Questions to Ask Putative President Obama’s En...
+ Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner on Les Naiman Sho...
+ Obama’s Long-Form Birth Certificate: A Quick $10,0...
+ A One-on-One Personal Interview with Commander Ker...
+ New Ad - Hawaii 2008 Senior Elections Clerk, Tim A...
+ The Kerchner v. Obama/Congress Case Is Not the Sam...
+ The Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al Appeal ...
+ The Post & Email’s Exclusive Interview with Eligib...
+ Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner on Revolution Radio Sho...
o ► May (16)
+ On Obama’s Eligibility to be President, Who Is Pro...
+ Obama’s “Natural Born Citizen” Status: Is It Place...
+ New Ad - Obama's Lack of Eligibility - The Three E...
+ Rev. James David Manning Trial Results in Guilty V...
+ A U.S. Constitution Article II “natural born Citiz...
+ The Nonsense Published by Our Nation’s Editors Reg...
+ A TRUE ENIGMA by Pixel Patriot
+ Wash Times Natl Wkly-10 May 2010 Pg 5-Minister of ...
+ A Failed Lesson in Honor and Courage
+ A Catalog of Evidence - Concerned Americans Have G...
+ Obama - Maybe a Citizen of the United States but N...
+ Responses to an Obama Supporter’s Comments on Obam...
+ Washington Times Natl Wkly - 3 May 2010 Issue on P...
+ For Love of Party Obama Supporter Declares Preside...
+ Atty Mario Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner on Les Naiman Sho...
+ Thomas Jefferson a Founder of our Nation & Influen...
o ► April (13)
+ Atty Apuzzo and CDR Kerchner on Jeff Kuhner Show i...
+ Benjamin Franklin in 1775 thanks Charles Dumas of ...
+ Concerned Americans Have Good Reason to Doubt that...
+ George Washington Consulted the Legal Treatise "La...
+ The Court and Congress Expected the Other to Resol...
+ Newspaper Birth Announcement Ads in 1961 in two Ha...
+ Current Minister of Kenyan Government Declares Oba...
+ New Ad - Obama & Pelosi Flout the Constitution - O...
+ Kerchner v Obama Appeal - Atty Apuzzo Files Appell...
+ Kerchner v Obama Appeal - Atty Apuzzo Files 'Argum...
+ Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner on Revolution Radio Sho...
+ Kerchner v Obama & Congress Appeal - Activity in t...
+ Founder and Historian David Ramsay Defines a Natur...
o ► March (10)
+ What Does Obama Truly Want to Accomplish With His ...
+ Obamacare and the Natural Born Citizen Clause
o ► February (5)
o ► January (7)

* ► 2009 (129)
o ► December (4)
o ► November (10)
o ► October (16)
o ► September (5)
o ► August (10)
o ► July (19)
o ► June (16)
o ► May (9)
o ► April (12)
o ► March (10)
o ► February (9)
o ► January (9)

* ► 2008 (6)
o ► December (6)

Followers
Live Weather
Contributors

* Puzo1
* puzo1moderator
* cfkerchner

Blog Patrol
FEEDJIT Live Traffic Feed

A Constitutional Crisis
from The Betrayal by David-Crockett

The Post & Email

AMERICA IN DISTRESS…WHO WILL ANSWER HER CALL?
by drkate, ©2010

(Aug. 1, 2010) — For the first time in its history, the United States government has knowingly allowed a constitutionally-ineligible individual to break into and occupy the White House. All the branches of government have been involved, along with the media: the legislative branch by failing to do its constitutional duty; the judicial branch by thwarting any attempt to have the facts heard; the Executive branch by using taxpayer funds and the color of authority to defend the usurpation.

The media, in collaboration with private unelected officials and elected officials, have ensured a blackout of news and information on this most fundamental matter to the American public. The State governments also obliged the usurpation with a collective failure to ensure the integrity of the 2008 election. In 2008, all Americans were disenfranchised as a result of this dereliction of duty, in certain cases with malice aforethought.

The natural born citizen clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 was written with the national security interests of the United States as its focus. In order to ensure that the President and Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces was loyal ONLY to the United States, the natural born citizen clause requires the President to be born on United States soil, to two citizen parents; have 14 years residency in the United States, and be 35 years of age. Mr. Obama fails the threshold test of being born to two U.S. citizen parents, as his father was a British National and Kenyan.

America in distress

The violation of this particular clause of the Constitution, above all others, arguably is the most serious ever in United States history, for it has allowed the invasion of the White House and our armed forces by a foreign power. This should alarm every American. Nothing the federal government does at this point has authority of law inasmuch as its titular head is illegally occupying the White House. We are extremely vulnerable to attack, blackmail, and extortion as a result of this egregious dereliction of duty. Congress’ duty to investigate the usurpation, and to have prevented it, is not a ministerial duty, it is an obligation. An on-going one. They all know, and now cannot evade their responsibility.

The Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution reserve to the states and the people powers not enumerated to the government; and the Declaration of Independence requires that to be true to liberty, forms of government in contradiction to it must be altered or abolished. If the current federal government will not protect the states and the people, it is our duty to create a federal government that can.

Americans across the country are uniting September 7-9 to draw attention to the constitutional crisis we are in because of the illegal, and treasonous, usurpation of the Presidency.
The Mission in September

Faced with this stark reality, many patriots have called for specific action in Washington, and across the Nation, to alert the public to:

* The fundamental ineligibility of Barack Obama for the Presidency,
* The heroes in the military who are upholding their oath to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic;
* The massive evidence of ineligibility, election fraud, and media complicity
* The responsibility of the Congress, Judiciary, and the Executive in allowing this usurpation and their obligation to investigate and take action to safeguard the United States immediately
* The danger that America faces with an ineligible Commander in Chief
* What we want Congress, the Executive and Judiciary to do

Specific Events (tentative):

* Monday, September 6, 8:30 pm. Candlelight vigil and opening ceremony TBA
* Tuesday, Sept. 7, 11:30 am. Walter Reed Memorial Hospital. Honoring Constitutional heroes
* Wednesday, Sept. 8, 8:30 am. Capitol Steps; House and Senate Office Buildings. Specific meetings with Republicans; public script and literature hand out, signage at key office buildings
* Thursday, Sept. 9, 8:30 am. Justice Department demonstration; White House, Supreme Court

We also intend to honor the heroes amongst us, including Reverend Manning and the Constitutional attorneys and clients who have brought forth action to remove the usurper.

We intend to convey our seriousness through our signage, discussions, literature, behavior, and singularity of message. And this is an on-going, rolling, velvet revolution. We encourage all Patriotic Americans to demonstrate their concern with similar actions across the country.

For more information, please see:

* The Silver Bullet
* The President’s Disability under the 25th Amendment
* Stop them Cold: The Usurpathon
* Calling All Patriots: Stop the Treason Campaign
* Dr Kate’s Platoon Takes the Hill

Please see drkatesview for regular updates on the project.

If you would like to participate in the planning, the event itself, similar state actions, or other ideas, please drop me an email at drkatesview@gmail.com

CHARGE! STOP THEM COLD!

© 2010, The Post & Email, Inc. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified.

Unbelievable! from obamacrimes.com

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/21/gop-lawmaker-blasts-white-house-m-spent-kenya-constitution-vote/
White House Spent $23M of Taxpayer Money to Back Kenyan Constitution That Legalizes Abortion, GOP Reps Say

By Tess Civantos

Published July 22, 2010

| FoxNews.com

Reuters

May 15, 2010: Kenyan supporters cheer at a rally to launch campaigns for the constitution referendum, in the capital Nairobi.

A Republican lawmaker is accusing the White House of “unconscionable” and “illegal” acts for its role in Kenya’s referendum on a new constitution, which would legalize abortion in the country for the first time.

Rep. Chris Smith of New Jersey cited a report by the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, that estimated that more than $23 million in U.S. taxpayer funds have been spent on the referendum. Smith and other conservatives have complained that at least some of that money has been spent in support of the proposed constitution, possibly violating U.S. law.

“Under no circumstances should the U.S. government take sides,” Smith said at a news conference Wednesday. “Yet that is precisely what the Obama administration has done.”

The proposed constitution will curtail the vast powers of the Kenyan president, offering more balance among the different branches of government in an effort to bring order and stability to the political process of a nation often torn by tumultuous exchanges of power.

Vice President Biden told the Kenyan people in a recent speech, “Let me repeat, this is your decision, your decision alone. And the people of Kenya must make this choice — a choice for Kenya by Kenyans.”

Smith and other lawmakers have accused the Obama administration of offering incentives to Kenya to approve the controversial new constitution, promising that passage would “allow money to flow” into the nation’s coffers. A federal law known as the Siljander Amendment makes it illegal for the U.S. government to lobby on abortion in other countries.

“We were unable to get any information prior to asking for those (USAID) reports,” Smith said. “There’s been no transparency in this process.”

Smith had been joined by Reps. Darrell Issa of California and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida, both Republicans, in requesting the federal investigation into the administration’s spending on the referendum.

“U.S. law is being violated with impunity,” Smith told FoxNews.com. “We shouldn’t be pushing for other the ‘yes’ or the ‘no’ camp, but instead, we’re bankrolling the ‘yes’ campaign.”

One group that has received almost $3 million from the U.S. government, Development Alternatives, openly supported “advocating for efforts to eventually legalize abortion in Kenya,” Smith said. Another group, The Committee of Experts on Constitutional Review in Kenya, changed the wording of the Kenyan constitution’s abortion clause to make abortion more widely accessible – and has received over $180,000 from the U.S.

Thanks to these findings, nine of the more than 200 organizations in Kenya that received money from the U.S. have been suspended from receiving assistance, the U.S. Embassy spokeswoman Katya Thomas in Nairobi told the AP Friday.

But the congressmen are asking for more. They want the White House to be held accountable for its role.

“If violations of the law have occurred, which on the face of it they have, the information must be brought before law enforcement,” Smith said. “Not even presidents are above the law.”

The federal probe also found that the Kenyan constitution was not actually written by Kenyans, but by “U.S.-funded NGOs, working in concert with Planned Parenthood,” Smith said.

According to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America’s website, Planned Parenthood supports the Kenyan groups that wrote the abortion clause – the Kenyan Federation of Women Lawyers and its parent organization the Kenyan Reproductive Health and Rights Alliance.

Planned Parenthood’s website states that it sought “to improve maternal health conditions in Kenya by securing reproductive health laws and policies that promote women’s health,” its motivation for becoming involved in the constitutional revision process.

But some Kenyans think that the role of American organizations like Planned Parenthood in drafting the Kenyan constitution compromises Kenyan sovereignty and assaults its cultural heritage.

Theresa Okafor, CEO of Kenya’s Life League, said in a speech that the proposed constitution is “a conspiracy to strip Africa of its cherished values by international organizations like Planned Parenthood and the United Nations.”

“Africans regard every child as a blessing,” Okafor said. “Amidst biting poverty, the birth of a child is celebrated with pomp and pageantry. Children are treasures in Africa.”

Because abortion has never been an issue in Kenya until now, the country lacks an organized anti-abortion movement on the scale seen in the United States. But a number of church groups are mobilizing against the proposed constitution, as are some Kenyans who want to preserve the traditional culture of family values.

In March 2003, a group of young professionals formed the Life League, one of Kenya’s first pro-life organizations. In 2009, the Life League and 20 other Kenyan pro-life and pro-family groups united to form the Foundation for African Cultural Heritage – a heritage that they believe the abortion provision attacks.

Obama's Railroad

(This from a friend of mine, CC, facts check out...) AN

This could be a scandal of epic proportions and one that makes Nixon's Watergate or Clinton 's Monica Lewinsky affair pale by comparison. Why was there neither rhyme nor reason as to which dealerships of the Chrysler Corporation were to be closed?

Roll the clock back to the weeks just before Chrysler declared bankruptcy. Chrysler, like GM, was in dire financial straits and federal government "graciously" offered to "buy the company" and keep them out of bankruptcy and "save jobs."


Chrysler was, in the words of Obama and his administration, "Too big to fail." Same story with GM.

The Feds organized their "Automotive Task Force" to fix Chrysler and GM. Obama, in an act that is 100% unconstitutional, appointed a guy named Steve Rattner to be the White House's official Car Czar - literally, that's what his title is.

Rattner is the liaison between Obama, Chrysler, and GM.

Initially, the national media reported that Chrysler "had made this list of dealerships." Not true!

The Washington Examiner, Newsmax, Fox News and a host of other news agencies discovered that the list of dealerships was put together by the "Automotive Task Force" headed by no one other than Mr. Steve Rattner.

Now the plot thickens.

Remember earlier we said that there was neither rhyme nor reason why certain dealerships were closed?

Actually there's a very interesting pattern as to who was closed down. Again, on May 27, 2009, The Washington Examiner and Newsmax exposed the connection.

Amazingly, of the 789 dealerships closed by the federal government, 788 had donated money, exclusively to Republican political causes, while contributing nothing to Democratic political causes. The only "Democratic" dealership on the list was found to have donated $7,700 to Hillary's campaign, and a bit over $2,000 to John Edwards. This same dealership, reportedly, also gave $200.00 to Obama's campaign.

Does that seem a little odd to you?

Steve Rattner is the guy who put the list together. Well, he happens to be married to a Maureen White. Maureen just happens to be the former national finance chairman of the Democratic National Committee. As such, she has access to campaign donation records from everyone in the nation - Republican or Democrat. But of course, this is just a wacky "coincidence," we're certain.

Then comes another really wacky "coincidence."

On that list of dealerships being closed down, a weird thing happened in Arkansas , North Louisiana, and Southern Missouri . It seems that Bill Clinton's former White House Chief of Staff, Mack McClarty, owns a chain of dealership in that region, partnered with a fellow by the name of Robert Johnson.

Johnson happens to be founder of Black Entertainment Television and was a huge Obama supporter and financier.

These guys own a half dozen Chrysler stores under the company title of "LJ-McClarty-Landers." Interestingly, none of their dealerships were ordered closed - not one!

While all of their competing Chrysler/Dodge and Jeep dealership were!

Eight dealerships located near the dealerships owned by McClarty and Johnson were ordered shut down. Thus by pure luck, these two major Obama supporters now have a virtual monopoly on Chrysler sales in their zone.

Isn't that amazing?

Go look in The Washington Examiner, the story's there, and it's in a dozen or so other web-based news organizations; this isn't being made up.

Now if you thought Chrysler was owned by Fiat, you are mistaken. Under the federal court ruling, *65% of Chrysler is now owned by the federal government and the United Auto Workers union!*

Fiat owns 20%.

The other 15% is still privately owned and presumably will be traded on the stock market. Obama smiles and says he doesn't want to run the auto industry.

As horrifying as this is to comprehend, and being as how this used to be the United States of America , it would appear that the president has the power to destroy private businesses and eliminate upwards of 100,000 jobs just because they don't agree with his political agenda.

This is Nazi Germany stuff, and it's happening right here, right now, in our back yard.

There are voices in Washington demanding an explanation, but the "Automotive Task Force" has released no information to the public or to any of the senators demanding answers for what has been done.

Keep your ear to the ground for more on this story. If you've ever wanted to make a difference about anything in your life, get on the phone to your national senator or representative in the House and demand an investigation into this.

Benjamin Franklin had it right when he said, "All that's necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."

Car Czar No More

An amazing thing happened as this story was going to press. Obama's Car Czar, Steve Rattner, resigned on July 13 and was promptly replaced by former steelworkers union boss Ron Bloom. According to CBS News, Rattner left "to return to private life and spend time with his family."

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said, "I hope that he takes another opportunity to bring his unique skills to government service in the future."

By the way, Rattner is under investigation for a multi-million dollar pay-to-play investment bank scandal in New York .

Uh-oh! But, we're certain that had nothing to do with his resignation.

And, according to several news sources out there, there are rumors he's being investigated for what could be pay-to-play scandal involving the closing of Chrysler and GM dealerships. Really? Again, that couldn't have anything to with his resignation-that's ridiculous! Like CBS said, this guy just wants to "spend more quality time with his family."

Obama has 32 personally appointed "czars" who answer to no one but him, all of whom are acting without any Constitutional authority.

But hey, we're sure they all have "unique skills,"......as Tim Geithner likes to say!


SOOOOO….HOW’S THE CHANGE WORKING FOR YOU?…


Check it out at the following websites.....

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/05/hope-change-car-czar-behind-chrysler.html&nb=p;

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Obamas-auto-policy-All-in-the-Democratic-family-44414452.html

The Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al Appeal to 3rd Circuit -
Attorney Apuzzo Files his Response to the Show Cause Order...
rather lengthy (100 pages), but WELL WORTH THE READ...
can be found at the following site:


http://www.scribd.com/doc/34567772/03-09-4209-Appeal-Atty-Apuzzo-Files-Kerchner-Response-to-Court-s-Show-Cause-Order-for-Damages-Costs

Birtherreport
ObamaRelease YourRecords

The plot thickens! Dr. Ron Polland is reporting that Obama’s COLB was forged using Hawaii Communications Officer, Janice Okubo’s, 2007 issued COLB. Dr. Polland names 4 other people, among the many, complicit in this long known fraud and cover-up, including Hawaii Governor, Linda Lingle, and, Politifact Reporter, Amy Hollyfield. Can’t forget Factcheck!

Dr. Polland also reports that Obama’s vital records were amended between 2008-2009.

Dr. Polland points out; “for the past two years, Hawaii has refused to confirm that the online COLB copy is a genuine 2007 COLB issued to Obama on June 6, 2007.”… More details and names in the video below… Bonus info below Dr. Polland’s new video…

Via TheDrRJP; FRAUD IN THE USA EXCLUSIVE! - Blue Hawaii - Sometime between October 31, 2008, and July 27, 2009, the dates of Health Director Chiyome Fukino’s two press releases, Hawaii amended Obama’s birth record. A brand-new Certificate of Live Birth (not Certification) was issued to him. The DOH Director decides what goes in or gets taken out of birth records. She went on record as saying that “President Obama posted a copy of his certificate on his campaign website” even though she has refused to authenticate it for the past two years. This created a conundrum that could only be resolved by changing Obama’s birth records to match what is in that online copy - which is a stone-cold forgery and Fukino knows it! That forged COLB also has its origin within the DOH: watch the video to find out the shocking truth. Source.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nc5JE0JAqlk&feature=player_embedded



Faked

[6/11/10]Dr. Polland’s new report regarding Factcheck.org, Politifact, Hawaii DoH, and Obama’s Organizing for America.

by Dr. Polland and some; Clear, concise, and clever, “It’s the conspiracy, Stupid!” takes you behind the scenes of the greatest birth certificate fraud in history and exposes the four groups who collaborated in hiding Obama’s real birth certificate passing off a fake one instead to deceive and defraud the American public. The whole point of calling it a “wacky conspiracy theory” is to prevent people from finding out what’s really going on. It is no different than the guilty saying they are innocent. For the first time anywhere, here are the facts and evidence gathered during my two year investigation that clearly explains the rationale for doing it, the propaganda they used to pull it off, and the campaign they have mounted to discredit conservatives.

The first video below is Dr. Pollands’ new video report. It’s a must see video! Previous reports on Dr. Polland can be seen http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/05/dr-polland-aka-dr-pollarik-reports-that.html and http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/05/end-of-obama-aka-soetoro-birth.html. Birth Certificate fraud is nothing new in America. [image source]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWciae2HFKc&feature=player_embedded



Dr. Ron Polland’s Playlists; http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=C2281523DF8C0230
Dr. Ron Polland’s Youtube Channel; http://www.youtube.com/TheDrRJP



Continue here for BIRTHER REPORT RECAP;http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/06/bombshell-hawaii-official-janice-okubos.html

Demand for Obama’s Resignation Petition has been launched
from The Betrayal by Niayna

The Post & Email

PETITIONS TO BE DELIVERED TO HOUSE AND SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEES AS WELL AS OBAMA
by Sharon Rondeau

Patriots Heart Network features news stories and Twitter updates from many sources as well as nightly broadcasts on BlogTalk Radio(Jun. 27, 2010) — Chalice Jackson, owner of Patriots Heart Network, in tandem with Scott Winchell and Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely (Ret.) of Stand Up America and formerly a military analyst at the Fox News Channel, have announced the launch of a new initiative which demands the resignation of “Barack Obama, his appointees, and his administration forthwith” for “High Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

The “NO CONFIDENCE! We Demand Resignation Petition Letter for High Crimes and Misdemeanors” can be found here and is downloadable and printable.

On June 5, 2010, Maj. Gen. Vallely gave a speech at the Lincoln-Reagan Dinner in Virginia City, Montana in which he said:

We now must call for the immediate resignation of Barry Soetero (AKA President Barack Hussein Obama) …..based on Incompetence, Deceit, Fraud, Corruption, Dishonesty and Violation of the US Oath of Office and the Constitution…And a call for a National Petition for new elections to select the next President of the United States of America must be initiated. We can wait no longer for a traditional change of Power and New Government.

Gen. Vallely was a guest on Patriots Heart Network on June 8, 2010, discussing his stated position about Obama and his regime and why he had reached that conclusion. The Post & Email’s interview with Gen. Vallely is here.

Chalice was kind enough to give generously of her time to The Post & Email to explain the scope, focus and mission of the petition drive.

SHARON: Thank you so much for being willing on short notice to explain your new initiative. How can other websites, groups and individuals become involved?

CHALICE: The website is SomeoneDiedForMeToday, and the best place to start is there. If you wish to become one of our partner organizations, just go to the website where there’s an email link right at the top of the page. That would be for the larger groups. Our goal by the end of the weekend is to fill up our page. We’re almost halfway there now. Of course, we’d like to fill up two pages, so I don’t want to limit my goals at all. The more, the better!

We’re putting up the banners as they come in so that everyone will know for history’s sake who were the fastest and most perceptive to get on board right away. And you were one of them, and I want to thank you, Sharon, because The Post & Email is such a wonderful news media organization and we’re very grateful to have you join in this peaceful but active movement to force our elected officials to be held accountable for their actions by utilizing the tools in the U.S. Constitution itself for redress.

SHARON: How did this get its start?

CHALICE: General Vallely and Scott Winchell, who works closely with the General, have been working on the concept of the resignation of public officials for some time, over a year now. I was getting ready to interview the General, and he and I had a conversation, and through that conversation, I said, “Why don’t we partner up and Patriots Heart will lead the charge, and through that process we’ll ask everybody in America to sign a petition. We debated quite a bit about what type of petition to do. Last summer I personally delivered over 1.5 million signatures to every member of Congress with signed receipts and did not get a single call back. So I know how effective these petitions that are served in pages are. So the decision was made to try individual petition letters, and through a couple of conversations among Scott, Paul and I, we designed this approach.

There are several reasons for it. The name “Someone Died For Me Today” came about after I had discussed with someone my concern about what’s going on in our country, and he said to me that he was too busy to be politically involved and didn’t think he should become involved…and I just looked at him and the words just blurted out. I said, “Somebody died for you today; don’t you get it?” So that’s how the name came about; I had just blurted it out. When I said that, I said to myself, “Someone died for me today, too.”

That means something, because why did they die? They died for their oath. They gave an oath to their country and to their Constitution, and they served their oath to the ultimate degree. When we are in a situation where most of Americans believe there’s something wrong with Mr. Obama but still, half of those Americans are asleep, what is it that’s going to cause them to wake up? I think the question comes back to, “We all have an oath,” and that’s why the website posts the American Creed, so that we as Americans can say, “What is our level of responsibility right now in making sure that our constitutional republic continues?”

Then, of course, when we look at Mr. Obama and many of the other politicians right now, we see that they are oath-breakers; they have broken their oath of office. When you try to take a petition and move it forward, you need to ask, “How do we do that? How do we get individuals to all agree on the same concept and not get lost in the minutia?”

I think that’s important, because the other aspect of this is the oath that they’ve broken. They have committed high crimes and misdemeanors against their oath. That’s why the top of our petition starts with the presidential oath of office and then from there, it goes down to say that Mr. Obama has taken that oath twice, and then it defines what a “high crime and misdemeanor” is. When you understand what that is, it will stun you. Let me read it to you. This is from Wikipedia, posted on June 20. They sometimes wordsmith things, as you know.

“High” in the legal parlance of the 18th century means “against the State”. A high crime is one which seeks the overthrow of the country, which gives aid or comfort to its enemies, or which injures the country to the profit of an individual or group. In democracies and similar societies it also includes crimes which attempt to alter the outcome of elections.

So if you can read that definition and agree that Mr. Obama has committed this high crime and misdemeanor, that is enough to then call for the House and Senate Judiciary Committees to launch an investigation, or at least for we the people to demand that they launch that investigation.

SHARON: Then this is not aimed at the question of Obama’s eligibility?

CHALICE: That’s correct; the eligibility issue isn’t involved in this at all. Some people might say that that’s another one of his high crimes: that he’s refusing to be open and transparent to the American people about his background, particularly as it pertains to his eligibility. But that is really not what this is about; this is about high crimes and misdemeanors and it relates to his oath of office. He’s supposed to uphold the Constitution. There is only a certain number of ways that you can remove a president, and that was put into the Constitution specifically because it had a very clear meaning. What has happened over time is we’ve lost the understanding of what that means. So the eligibility question is completely separate from this initiative.

SHARON: You mentioned affecting the “outcome of elections.” Might one of the charges be related to the alleged job offers to Andrew Romanoff of Colorado and Joe Sestak of Pennsylvania in exchange for their requested withdrawal from political races and about which some senators have already asked for an investigation?

CHALICE: Absolutely. We have a right to know if that happened. If he’s committed this crime, let’s get it investigated openly. Obviously, when he has the majority power to move motions forward, he’s not going to move that. So it has to come from the people. But those would be two very good examples, and also the Blagojevich trial is another one that falls into that same category. So we have a trend; we don’t just have one, two or three. I believe there’s a fourth case of corruption as well.

SHARON: The Post & Email has been covering the Blagojevich trial and the alleged job offers to Romanoff and Sestak. Are there other things, for instance, election fraud when Obama was a candidate?

CHALICE: That’s a very important question, and the heart of that question is, “What is the range of charges that we’re making?” We have a section on our site where we’re asking others to bring forward that kind of information so that we can bring it to the House Judiciary Committee.

SHARON: I noticed that the charges are not specific at this point. Is there a reason for that?

CHALICE: There is a good reason for it. The goal is to let the American people look at the definition of “high crimes and misdemeanors,” and if they think he has committed them, then let’s get the investigation going and then we can put all those charges out there. We don’t want to get lost in the argument of the charges while we mobilize America. I think if most Americans read the Wikipedia definition of “high crimes and misdemeanors,” they would say, “Yes, Mr. Obama and his regime have committed these offenses.” To back that up, we’re adding that section to the website, and we’re also putting out a fourth page of talking points where we can list some of the transgressions.

I have gotten that same feedback from a couple of very important people who said, “I don’t think my friends are going to sign this if there aren’t specific charges.” But the real thing right now is the definition of “high crimes and misdemeanors.” If you read that, has he committed that? That’s all you’re affirming when you sign the petition: that he has committed high crimes and misdemeanors.

SHARON: Or we need an investigation, at the very least?

CHALICE: Exactly.

SHARON: Were any other people instrumental in putting together this effort?

CHALICE: We have a couple of wonderful web people who helped us quite a bit, and each of us has our own individuals whom we’ve consulted on secondary levels.

SHARON: Did you know Maj. Gen. Vallely before you talked about this project?

CHALICE: I had interviewed him a couple of times, and he had been on our radio station several times before as well. But this came about because it was the right time and place, and we had the conversation, and the energy connected. I think that there’s a timing in everything. We don’t have a long, interconnected relationship other than that we’re all patriots.

SHARON: How many signatures do you expect to get this weekend?

CHALICE: Our goal is to have 1,000 commitments to be Flame-Builders by the end of the weekend. We’re having a big show on Sunday night, and we’ll take those commitments as best as we can determine them at that point, and as the flames are built, then we can actually go backwards and count. That’s why people should send me an email, because then we know that groups of ten have gone out. Then it’s backed up by the paperwork being sent to Patriots Heart, so we should be able to go to the mailbox and start seeing signed petitions there. So this weekend, the goal is 1,000, and when we have 1,000 who are agreeing to become Flame-Builders, that will give us 1,000,000 signatures by July 13.

SHARON: What is significant about the date of July 13?

CHALICE: We’re just moving; there is no time to waste. This is another aspect to the question that you asked earlier about how this started, and I think it’s important to understand that Gen. Vallely and I had a conversation and I’ve had this conversation with almost every patriot I know, and they’re saying the same thing: We can’t wait until November. With everything going on in the Gulf, I think universally, we have an ache in our gut that won’t go away and the feeling that our actions to date haven’t made that big of a difference. Therefore, waiting until November is very difficult to stomach. If everyone understands that if we get this petition drive moving and it is on the House floor in July, it changes the conversation, and that’s what we need to do. We need to stop the conversation and the way that they’re controlling it as if there’s no emergency going on in the Gulf and the other ways in which this regime is ignoring its constitutional obligations, especially in Arizona. So we need to stop the conversation immediately because we have elections coming. We want Obama impeached by September 1.

When other people understand that this is happening, then it changes the whole context of the election. Now we will say to all the politicians, “The people are holding you accountable to your oath.” Because if you look at what’s going on right now, it’s almost as if the words have no meaning. This whole question right now that Obama is suddenly going to give amnesty to illegal immigrants by executive order, going in by the back door, shows that there is no attention being paid to his oath of office, and we need to hold him responsible. And why don’t we hold him responsible? The media won’t support it, so we have to drive it ourselves. There is beauty in a contest which is based upon each individual pod, where every Flame-Builder is a group of ten. Pick your Flames carefully; pick ten people with whom you can work and follow up in five days and say, “Did you get your ten letters out?” or “Did you find your ten Flame-Builders?”

And for group leaders, you don’t have to report your group of ten to anybody; you just send us an email and say, “We have our group and it’s moving,” and you check back with them to make sure that happens. Now if we need to ignite this flame again for another time when we can’t get the cooperation of the media or we the people can’t get the changes that we need right now, then we can do that. But it will always be contained at the individual level, and that’s where it belongs. I’m just sick and tired of the fact that we raise our voices, and nobody is listening. We have to hold elected officials accountable to their oath of office.

SHARON: Why do you think Congress has been so unresponsive to the many issues that Americans clearly have had problems with during the last 18 months such as the banking bill and health care bill which many argue are unconstitutional?

CHALICE: I think there are many reasons. Part of it, of course, is the fact that big business, politicians and the media are all sleeping in the same bed. They’re disgusting in their gluttony. We’ve had the gluttony for a while, and it has been growing. But it’s over the top now, and we are in the middle of a global crisis. This oil spill is not a little deal; it’s getting bigger, and they’re not even allowing us to know what’s going on there. The only way we’re going to get our country back is if we take it back person by person, and that’s why it’s important to remember that someone has died for you today and for me today, because they’re defending our Constitution. It’s time to take a look and say, “What does the Constitution mean to you?” If you think that this regime has violated its oath of office, then it’s time to bring it up and make it be heard. I believe that will set the bar to get all politicians to be accountable. That’s what we’re about as tea partiers: to get politicians to obey their oath of office. So how do we enforce it? Well, we don’t have until November to wait. The time to enforce it is right now for all of these officials who are up for re-election or who are going to want to be elected. I don’t know how else we can do it, because when you have all the major powers sleeping together, and they have their own agenda, and that agenda is not based on the Constitution, the only answer is the people. There is no other option.

SHARON: You mentioned an important radio show on Sunday night, June 27. What time is the show and who will your guests be?

CHALICE: It will be from 9:00 to 11:00 p.m. EDT, and I want all of the group leaders to call in and commit to being on our list. We’re looking for individuals who have email lists and everyone who was willing to mobilize and become a Flame-Builder. General Vallely will be on as well.

SHARON: What will you be discussing?

CHALICE: We’ll be talking about the process of building groups and getting petitions mailed out. It’s very important that your readers and everyone know that the petition letters be mailed. The impression of land mail is much stronger than any other method of delivery, other than personal visits. Each chamber of Congress must retain the letters. When we get 1,000,000 on July 13, that will actually be 4,000,000 pieces of mail delivered to four different groups.

The more signatures we have, the more it’s going to roll. That’s how a chain works. Just think about this: how long has it been since any of us have believed in a chain letter? Twenty years, right? But this can’t be completed on email, although you can circulate it that way to get started. Everyone must make sure to actually mail the petition letters to the people at the bottom of the form.

SHARON: How will you be documenting this process as it moves forward?

CHALICE: I want to get pictures of what the 10,000,000 letters look like. So when they’re delivered to Patriots Heart, we’ll choose a location and take continuing pictures so that we can give updates and people will know what’s going on. That’s another thing that happens to us: we jump in on these campaigns, and we never really know how much of an effect we had. But this time, we have a way to track it. We will know that there are 1,000,000 letters because we will have counted them.

SHARON: So each person has to mail five copies of the letter?

CHALICE: Yes, and keep one for yourself. Put it in your family Bible, because you’re making history right now. You want to be able to say, “This is what I did.” All you have to do is sit down and address five envelopes, send them out, and get ten people to do that. If that’s all you have to do to make a profound, instantaneous change to your government, it’s a lot easier than going out to the battlefield, isn’t it?

SHARON: I would think anyone would rather do this.

CHALICE: And we can make it fun. Connect with your ten people, keep it fresh, and send it out, because we can make a difference and we know we have an audience. What does it take for each of us to take ourselves away from our out-of-control schedules, which we all have right now, to do this? I know for me personally, I feel I have to be making a difference. So this is what I can say to everybody: Do your chain, build that chain, and you will have a relationship that will last. We don’t know where that relationship will go yet, but it’s one that will be interesting to watch. Also, you know for a fact that when we get a volume of these petitions, the House is going to have to pay attention, and it’s going to change the conversation. I can guarantee you that. Beyond that, God will know.

We know that there are some people who can’t do more than engage their immediate family, and we need them, too. They are the Sparks who have mailed their five petition letters.

There is an advantage in sending a copy of the petitions to Patriots Heart in that when mail arrives at the White House, it all goes through their security system. We will be able to know much faster how many petitions are actually being received because we’ll be maintaining a count here. So make sure to send us a copy of your petition. The only thing that everyone has to put on the petition is first and last name, city and state. If individuals want to be part of our updates and email lists, they can sign up on the website. But the core of this process is to get the petitions out there, because some people are concerned about retribution from the government.

SHARON: Government has certainly grown a lot in the last 18 months, and Thomas Jefferson said that if the people fear their government, there is tyranny. Would an investigation begin in the House or Senate Judiciary Committee?

CHALICE: Investigations for impeachment can begin in either committee, although actual impeachment proceedings begin in the House.

The important thing is, if you can’t find ten people but you can get three, you’ve still done something. That will equate to the end result being 300,000 signatures. This is a very interesting point: if I just start one Flame, which is a group of ten, within 26 days, that will bring 1,000,000 petitions. When you really think about it, it doesn’t make sense. But in increments of five days, if you do multiples of ten, that’s how it works. The integrity at the chain-link level is the key; you have to have a group of ten who will make sure that their group of ten makes sure that their group of ten gets people to send the petitions. It’s like a wildfire.

SHARON: I’ve been equating it to the spark, the flame, and then a huge bonfire that can be seen from anywhere in the country.

CHALICE: Exactly!

SHARON: Is there anything you’d like to add about the petition drive?

CHALICE: As you get your pods together, contact your boots-on-the-ground leaders. Reach out to your groups. Another thing that will help is for those who are able to go to senior homes, VFWs and get those people engaged, work with various clubs…As you go to your July 4 parade, take these packages and hand them out. However we spread it, the movement goes. That would be one thing. And leaders, if you’re on the ground working with candidates, contact them and get them involved. I went to a 912 group meeting on Friday night, and people were grabbing the petitions like crazy! It seemed to be what everybody wants, and they were excited. It takes a little bit of explanation, but that’s easy! Also, we’re building icons for Facebook and Twitter, so when you’re a Flame-builder, you’ll get a special icon you can use. If you get more than one Flame, then you’ll get more than one. Or if you’re a torch-blower, you’ll get a whole bunch!

SHARON: You had mentioned how organizations can sign up to support your efforts. What else do you need other than publicizing it on various websites?

CHALICE: We really need help at the Town Square to build the evidence against Mr. Obama. So if individuals have a passion about that, they can help there. It’s not only about Obama; we also are building a database of how oaths have been broken by individuals such as Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, Harry Reid, and all of the different elected officials. So if someone has been studying one person or another and wants to make sure that that information is contained as a breach of oath, he or she can enter it in the Town Square and it will be a resource. That’s very important, because we’re all so scattered right now, so let’s focus on the Constitution and elected officials’ oath.

The other thing that I would really like to see, as we do this, is a celebration of the fact that we’re spreading liberty. If people have artwork they’d like to submit, that’s great. We can also have contests for who can recruit the most Flames. We should try to have fun with it because we’re all so stressed right now. On the serious side, we want to remember the people who died for us today, so we’re looking to make sure that stories about soldiers who have paid the ultimate price become part of our forum. That’s very important.

To make this happen, it has to be taken to individuals who aren’t necessarily engaged. We have to go there. When you do, and they say, “I can’t be engaged,” you remind them that someone, almost a baby, is dying for our Constitution. It just makes me crazy to think that our children are dying for their oath and we can’t get our politicians to commit to theirs. I don’t get it.

SHARON: Thank you very much for your time, Chalice, and explaining this new initiative.

———————–

Editor’s Note: More information on the strategy for the petition drive can be found here. Those wishing to donate to support the project can do so here.

The Post & Email has reported on the following cases which could constitute violations of the U.S. Constitution:

Several House members have already called for an investigation into the State Department’s planned financial support of a new proposed Kenyan constitution which promotes the legalization of abortion, in possible violation of the Siljander Amendment.

The sale of Chrysler to Fiat under Obama’s watch and the numerous dealerships which were put out of business as a is being challenged by Attorneys Donofrio and Pidgeon, who have filed a lawsuit which is ongoing.

Article IV, Section IV of the U.S. Constitution states that “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion…” Is Obama protecting the citizens in border states by filing a lawsuit against Arizona for passing a law to protect itself? There are also reports that Obama might be planning to grant amnesty to illegal immigrants by executive order.

© 2010, The Post & Email, Inc. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified.