Opinion: Hawaii Court Hearing Verifies that White House and Health Department Have the Same Fraudulent Document

WHY PRESENT OR MAINTAIN A FORGERY?

by Just Thinking

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/10/17/opinion-hawaii-court-hearing-verifies-that-white-house-and-health-department-have-the-same-fraudulent-document/

Has the Hawaii Department of Health colluded with Obama to maintain a forgery as an authentic birth record?

(Oct. 17, 2011) —

On January 18, 2011, Hawaii Governor Abercrombie admitted publicly that “a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.”

Then around April 11, 2011, Dr. Fukino said that “she found the original birth record, properly numbered, half typed and half handwritten, and signed by the doctor who delivered Obama, located in the files.”

Then on April 25, 2011, Hawaii Dept of Health Director Fuddy wrote to Obama’s attorney, “Enclosed please find two certified copies of your ORIGINAL Certificate of Live Birth. I have witnessed the copying of the certificate and attest to the authenticity of these copies.” And that same day Governor Abercrombie put out a press release saying that since 2001, it was Hawaii’s policy “to issue and provide only the computer-generated Certifications of Live Birth, and to not produce photocopies of actual records to fulfill requests for certified copies of certificates. Director Fuddy made an exception for President Obama by issuing copies of the ORIGINAL birth certificate.”

Then on April 27, 2011 in the White House press conference, Obama’s White House Counsel Bob Bauer stated that Hawaii officials had copied the long form birth certificate and that counsel had gone to Hawaii to pick it up. Bauer said, “And you’ll see the letter from the director of Health Department that states she oversaw the copy and is attesting to it.” Then Assistant to the President Dan Pfeiffer stated that the two certified copies of the birth certificate had a state seal.

Obama received his official copy of his certified original long form Certificate of Live Birth from Fuddy and posted it on the White House website on April 27, 2011. Surprisingly, it was not half typed and half hand written as Dr. Fukino had stated, and there was no visible state seal.

While many experts have indicated that the birth certificate is a fraud, there are some basic issues in the document that stand out to even the layman. There were some very strange things in Obama’s long-form birth certificate document such as:

the birth certificate number 61- 10641,

BARACK’s name,

Stanley Ann Dunham Obama’s signature,

field descriptor text, etc., which were each split into two different layers of the pdf document.

And there was more problematic fraud in Obama’s birth certificate, as some elements (such as the registrar’s date stamp) are linked elements from another source which were then scaled 24% and rotated -90 degrees.

Then there was also the problem of the misspelled “the” in the registrar’s stamp which was spelled “TXE”.

And there was the nice happy face that the forger drew into the “A” in Alvin’s signature.

In the October 12 court hearing of Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka, Attorney Orly Taitz stated, “I showed them different provisions in their state law, that showed, that as an attorney with a case, where the certified copy is at issue, I am entitled to get verification of the documents…” So Orly was asking the court for verification that the fraudulent birth certificate that Obama released was in fact the same as what Hawaii had on file in their official records. Orly continues, “[Asst Atty General] Nagamine scrambled to come up with something and she came up with the stupidest excuse. She said that the state of HI verifies documents with only two words: yes or no, meaning that the document is yes, in records or no, not in records. And they verified and said yes…”

So now that Nagamine has said that Obama’s fraudulent birth certificate on the White House website is the same as the long-form birth certificate that Hawaii has been hiding in its official records, we now know that Hawaii’s so-called ORIGINAL birth certificate is fraudulent, too. And that means that there is no authentic Hawaiian birth certificate for Obama–or else Obama would have put it on the White House website rather than that fraudulent birth certificate with the smiley face. And Obama’s attorney Bob Bauer also told us that this long-form birth certificate that Dan Pfeiffer put on the White House website was the document that Fuddy had certified as a copy of the ORIGINAL long-form birth certificate in Hawaii’s official records. And when Pfeiffer was asked if Obama would later be holding his own birth certificate, Pfeiffer said, “He will not, and I will not leave it here for him to do so. But it will — the State Department of Health in Hawaii will obviously attest that that is a — what they have on file.”

Why couldn’t Obama hold his own birth certificate? Obviously everyone at the White House knew it was fraudulent and they just didn’t want Obama’s picture taken holding his own fraudulent birth certificate. So if Fuddy and Nagamine attest that Obama’s “original” birth certificate that Hawaii has in its records is the same as the fraudulent copy at the White House, then the State of Hawaii has no authentic long-form birth certificate for Obama. So Hawaii has just proven that Obama was not born in Hawaii. This means that Obama and the entire White House as well as state officials in Hawaii colluded in this identity fraud.

That fits right in with Obama stating that he was born at Queens Medical Center (on Obama’s Organizing For America website and other sources),

and then stating he was born at Kapiolani.

He’s the only person alive who was born at two different hospitals. Did Obama think that if he said he was born in one hospital in the US that was good, but saying that he was born in two hospitals was twice as much proof that he was born in the US?

Even though Fuddy says that Obama was born at Kapiolani, strangely, officials at Kapiolani won’t confirm that. In fact, Hawaii’s senior election official Tim Adams stated, “We called the two hospitals in Honolulu: Queens and Kapi’olani. Neither of them have any records that Barack Obama was born there.”

If Obama wasn’t born at either one of the hospitals that Obama says he was born at, then where did this long-form birth certificate in Hawaii’s “official” records come from? Actually, it was three different hospitals that Obama was born in. In 2009 the Kenyan Ministry of National Heritage honored Kogelo as the “birthplace of President Barack Obama.” And that means that Obama’s grandmother Sarah was telling the truth when she said not once, but twice, that Obama II was born in Kenya.

Judge David O. Carter betrays the Nation!

from The Betrayal by David-Crockett

UPDATE
Added Judge Carter’s 30 page report for dismissal at the end of the article
With thanks to James
END UPDATE

The Post & Email published

RULES THAT MASSIVE ELECTION FRAUD GIVES NO ONE STANDING!
by John Charlton

(Oct. 29, 2009) — In a ruling that has stunned none but those who love this Nation, Judge David O. Carter has granted the Motion to Dismiss presented by the Department of Justice, in the case Captain Pamela Barnett et al. vs. Obama et al..

The case involved the massive election fraud which occurred in 2008 General Election, when Barack Hussein Obama, though not an eligible candidate, was admitted to the ballot in California, and thus harmed and disadvantaged candidates running on third-party tickets, such as Wiley S. Drake, Alan Keyes, Gail Lightfoot, and Markham Robinson.

The ridiculous ruling was characterized by Dr. Orly Taitz, lead counsel for the Plaintiffs as something “written by the Defense,” according to the World Net Daily report.

The Post & Email will highlight the most vicious and erroneous statements in the ruling.

CARTER SHOWS HIMSELF TO BE A VICIOUS BAITER OF PATRIOTS

What Judge Carter did was not only deny justice, he viciously insulted and baited patriotic Military personnel everywhere, by his outrageous statement regarding the military plaintiff, Jason Freese in the case:

This Court will not interfere in internal military affairs nor be used as a tool by military officers to avoid deployment. The Court has a word for such a refusal to follow the orders of the President of the United States, but it will leave the issue to the military to resolve.

Just prior to this outrageous insult, the Carter shows himself to be a true supporter of dictatorship over law, when he claims that U.S. Military must serve even if their chief commander has no lawful authority to command them:

Furthermore, Lieutenant Freese’s claims are based upon the notion that his duty to serve is based upon who is in office. The duty to defend is not dependent upon a political or personal view regarding the individual who serves as President and Commander-in-Chief. It is an unequivocal duty to defend our country.

He then ridiculously claims that those who participate in the reception of funds taken unlawfully from the national treasury are not capable of being found guilty of crime, so long as they claim a reasonable doubt as to the legitimacy of the theft. For a Judge famed for his opposition to Mexican Mafia, he seems to have entire support for the Chicago Mob. Isn’t that a racist attitude, from the liberal point of view?

Carter’s laughable ruling also claims that you have a duty to pay taxes to the IRS, but you have no rights to ask whether the President who signs the spending bills for those taxes is legitimate: or in other words, you are a feudal serf, and must pay no matter how illegitimate or corrupt the Federal Government becomes, because, in the Judge’s words, the Supreme Court says so!

Then, while Carter begrudgingly admits that third-party candidate suffered injury by being opposed by a potential ineligible candidate, he finds that his court cannot remedy the crime, and therefore he will not take action on the complaint! His argument ignores completely the question of eligibility of office, and presumes the fact that Obama is eligible, contrary to the fact of the case! He even implies that Congress can change the definition of what a Natural Born Citizen is, by its choice of a presidential candidate in Joint Session!

On quo warrento, Carter makes the bold face lie of claiming the D.C. code gives exclusive jurisdiction over quo warrento proceedings regarding the President to the D.C. courts!

Carter closes by personally attacking Dr. Orly Taitz

Finally, if there is anyone who thought that Judge Carter was impartial, his closing remarks, in which he devotes a very long paragraph insulting Dr. Orly Taitz should be read in full:

The hearings have been interesting to say the least. Plaintiffs’ arguments through Taitz have generally failed to aid the Court. Instead, Plaintiffs’ counsel has favored rhetoric seeking to arouse the emotions and prejudices of her followers rather than the language of a lawyer seeking to present arguments through cogent legal reasoning.

Imagine that! Taitz’s supporters are “followers” and “prejudiced”! My my, what bigots we patriots are!

Judge Carter continues his diatribe thus:

While the Court has no desire to chill Plaintiffs’ enthusiastic presentation, Taitz’s argument often hampered the efforts of her cocounsel (sic) Gary Kreep (“Kreep”), counsel for Plaintiffs Drake and Robinson, to bring serious issues before the Court

Any objective listener will remember, however, that it was Attorney Kreep who often criticized Taitz’s arguments in court, and not the other way around.

The Court has attempted to give Plaintiffs a voice and a chance to be heard by respecting their choice of counsel and by making every effort to discern the legal arguments of Plaintiffs’ counsel amongst the rhetoric. This Court exercised extreme patience when Taitz endangered this case being heard at all by failing to properly file and serve the complaint upon Defendants and held multiple hearings to ensure that the case would not be dismissed on the technicality of failure to effect service.

While the original complaint in this matter was filed on January 20, 2009, Defendants were not properly served until August 25, 2009. Taitz successfully served Defendants only after the Court intervened on several occasions and requested that defense counsel make significant accommodations for her to effect service.

Imagine that! When Obama and his lawyers pretended not to receive service, it is Taitz who is at fault!

Carter descends further into the house of the mad, when he writes:

Taitz also continually refused to comply with court rules and procedure. Taitz even asked this Court to recuse Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato on the basis that he required her to comply with the Local Rules. See Order Denying Pls.’ Mot. For Modification of Mag. J. Nakazato’s Aug. 6, 2009, Order; Denying Pls.’ Mot. to Recuse Mag. J. Nakazato; and Granting Ex Parte App. for Order Vacating Voluntary Dismissal (Sep. 8, 2009).

Taitz also attempted to dismiss two of her clients against their wishes because she did not want to work with their new counsel. See id.

Then Judge Carter gives a tantrum, because citizens wrote him letters encouraging him to be a patriot — clearly an offense that this usurper supporter will not pardon!

Taitz encouraged her supporters to contact this Court, both via letters and phone calls. It was improper and unethical for her as an attorney to encourage her supporters to attempt to influence this Court’s decision. Despite these attempts to manipulate this Court, the Court has not considered any outside pleas to influence the Court’s decision.

Then Judge Carter defames Attorney Taitz:

Additionally, the Court has received several sworn affidavits that Taitz asked potential witnesses that she planned to call before this Court to perjure themselves. This Court is deeply concerned that Taitz may have suborned perjury through witnesses she intended to bring before this Court.

While the Court seeks to ensure that all interested parties have had the opportunity to be heard, the Court cannot condone the conduct of Plaintiffs’ counsel in her efforts to influence this Court.

If Carter — he obviously does not deserve the title of “Judge” — showed his ethics by hiring Siddhart Velarmoor as law clerk, it is clear tha he has shown himself a traitor to the Nation, by his ruling in Barnett vs. Obama.

Finally, Carter closes with the most exquisite piece of pharisaical self-defense in the history of the American judiciary:

Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism.