OBAMA truth REVEALED

2012-02-15T19:44:00.000-08:00

Obama Media Begin the Faking of Obama Poll Numbers

HOW MANY AMERICANS CAN SEE WHAT OBAMA’S ENABLERS ARE DOING?

by Sher Zieve, ©2012

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Has Obama been installed as a dictator with the cooperation of Republicans and Democrats in Congress?

(Feb. 15, 2012) — In order to sway the vast majority and growing number of Americans who have finally faced up to the fact that Obama is purposefully trying to destroy the United States of America, the Obama Media have begun their side of the Obama syndicate’s overall strategy of lying to us. Polls now show 50% of voters would vote for Obama. Intelligent people–even those few on the Left– know this is a lie. But, it’s what all third-world countries have done since their inception.

This is what we said would happen, at least a year ago. This is what is happening now. The polls are being used to convince the more uninformed amongst us that there is no real hope of regaining our country and we’d better get used to submitting to the dictator already in office. Obama does not intend to leave–under any circumstances–so we may as well accept our enslavement as the good sheeple Obama plans to herd off the cliff. Obama has told us via his actions over and over again that he will decimate our country and we can do nothing about it.

Note: As there are now myriad Marxist-plants in the Republicans Party (we who have actually followed their shenanigans for years know who they are) the Marxist-Dems have pretty much all of the support they need to pass one unconstitutional bill after another. And–if by some miracle these bills do not pass–they still have Obama who will unconstitutionally and therefore illegally issue an Executive Order for anything he wants. As I’ve mentioned before, we’re already living under a dictatorship.

Today, it was announced that Obama plans to reduce our nuclear weapons to virtually nothing (an 80% reduction) and less than either China or Russia possesses. The dictator-in-chief is bent upon making the USA a target for both nukes and takeover by hostile forces as soon as possible. Our own corrupt Congress and US military leaders are currently silent…with only crickets being heard in the distance. In this, silence=concurrence.

Earlier this year, with his canceling of the (already contracted) Keystone pipeline deal with Canada and virtually forcing Canada to sell their oil to China, and his shutting down one coal mine after another, Obama has (in no uncertain terms) essentially told We-the-People “No more energy for you! It’s time for your country to die and make way for my real purpose and ascendancy. You have already learned that I can do anything I want to you and your country and no one will stop me. I AM Obama!”

We know about all too many of the other horrors Obama has already leveled upon us including (but, not limited to) ObamaCare, open borders (in order to destroy our border States), placing our enemy, the Muslim Brotherhood, in very high level security positions within the US government, allowing Iran to become nuclear-weaponized (while he guts the USA of its nukes), removing virtually all of the money in the US Treasury for his own reasons and setting up one after another “green” companies as shells for his own personal and Democrats’ slush funds and money laundering operations. Each day Obama remains in office he takes more away from us then gives it to himself and his friends. Congress and the leftist courts are smiling with him as they, too, work to instill and install as many perversities as possible and help him shred what was left of the US Constitution.

We have already been informed that if Obama seizes another term in office, he will remove the entire Bill of Rights–with the Second Amendment as his first target. Note: He has already done away with the First Amendment’s freedom of religion clause. Telling the Catholic Church (which would include other Churches and Synagogues) that they must comply with the provision of contraceptives, abortions and sterilizations is in direct conflict with the First Amendment. It is also illegal (which hasn’t stopped Obama from doing anything thus far), as the POTUS has no authority to make any decisions regarding the First Amendment–whatsoever–or any other Amendments in our Bill of Rights. It is forbidden by our now-almost-defunct Constitution. But, our elected officials seem to either stand in agreement with him or are cowering in silence at these escalating outrages. I’m sure that–after its decades of following the Marxist-Democrat line of “social justice”–the Catholic Church was shocked by Obama. They really didn’t think the Obama crocodile would try to eat them. But, it did…and may still do so.

As I have said many…many times (even talk show hosts now openly agree with me and are repeating what I’ve written) ‘if no one stops Obama, it’s as if the law no longer exists’. Sorry this cannot be more positive, folks. But, we are allowing Obama to steal everything we have, destroy our God-given rights and become our slave master. This is profoundly serious. He truly must be stopped.

As the 2012 General Election looms closer the bogus poll numbers will increase. BTW, the economy is not doing better. It‘s actually doing worse. Those numbers are also being manipulated by the Obama machine. In order to even begin to report numbers that would help Obama, the ObamaGov and the major media had to drop all essentially important data. The actual facts, as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and reiterated by Tyler Durden, are: “…the people not in the labor force exploded by an unprecedented record 1.2 million. No, that’s not a typo: 1.2 million people dropped out of the labor force in one month! So as the labor force increased from 153.9 million to 154.4 million, the non-institutional population increased by 242.3 million meaning, those not in the labor force surged from 86.7 million to 87.9 million. Which means that the civilian labor force tumbled to a fresh 30 year low of 63.7% as the BLS is seriously planning on eliminating nearly half of the available labor pool from the unemployment calculation.” The Obama government is continuing to fake employment numbers, as well as removing other detrimental to his ruling syndicate.

The major media belongs to the Obama syndicate. I suspect they actually believe the crocodile won’t eat them either. Apparently, they have short memories as to what happened to the press under the Perons, Stalin, Hitler and, most recently, Hugo Chavez. But, if we let it, we already know the crocodile is going eat us.

2012-02-12T17:36:00.000-08:00

Centralized Government is a Freedom-Grabbing Black Hole!

FROM “THE PARALLAX PROPHECIES”

by Ron Ewart, ©2012

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

(Feb. 12, 2012) — “Those who have been once intoxicated with power, and have derived any kind of emolument from it, even though but for one year, never can willingly abandon it. They may be distressed in the midst of all their power; but they will never look to anything but power for their relief.” — Edmund Burke

Like political power, a massive black hole is an insatiable beast. It will literally absorb (eat) anything that gets too close. It eats surrounding gases, whole stars, star systems and planets. And as it eats, it grows, and the more it eats, the larger and more powerful it gets. Its power reaches out deeper and deeper into the heavens and warps the very fabric of space and time. A black hole is a whirlpool in the universe and its immense gravity powers entire galaxies while it clears the space around it like a giant vacuum cleaner inside its event horizon. At its center is a point of infinite density where the laws of physics no longer apply. It is, in its growing sphere of influence, the epitome of absolute power. Not even light can escape it.

Since the dawn of human civilization, the masses have been, and still are, in a constant struggle against the ever-increasing power of centralized government. Whether it be kings, despots, dictators, or even democracies, centralized power grows and grows, like a black hole, until it envelops and consumes all those who would attempt to break it up or destroy it. Even though the Founding Fathers went to great pains to inhibit the rise of the federal government by limiting its powers in the U. S. Constitution, every succeeding executive, legislative and judicial branch of government since George Washington, has wriggled and finagled around its constitutional restraints into ever-increasing political power. The jaws of absolute power are open wide and lie there in our not-too-distant future if the people don’t take it upon themselves to break up that centralized power and restore it to the states and to the people, as it was intended by those who gave birth to freedom over two centuries ago at great sacrifice.

Throughout history, when centralized power is broken up or destroyed, it usually comes from the people violently rising up, en masse, and restoring political power in the people and dividing all such power into smaller jurisdictions, which was part of the core foundation of the U. S. Constitution. It was the states that created the federal government, not the other way around. It is the states and the people that are supposed to have the supreme power under our Constitutional Republic, not the federal government.

Fractionalized power, split up between many small centers of political power, (i.e. states, counties and cities) is freedom’s only salvation. Centralized, concentrated authority in a single center of power, in the end, will be freedom’s demise.

For over 100 years the power of the American federal government has grown to the point where it now is the beast whose only goal is to perpetuate itself by “eating” anyone or anything that gets in its way. Constitutional limitations, or resistance from the states, or the people, are vigorously opposed by those who hold federal power. The federal government will sue in Federal court any state that tries to invoke its 10th Amendment rights, as Attorney General Eric Holder has done to several states over their attempts to control illegal immigration. The federal government will lie, dupe, or use propaganda and outright brainwashing to paint a rosy picture of what a good job it is doing for the people. Obama’s entire campaign strategy for re-election will be and is based on lies and propaganda, since he cannot run on his dismal record of failure.

As an example of this propaganda that government puts out, highly credible individuals have charged that the current unemployment numbers are a complete fraud because the government simply removes a million or so people from the total to make the rate look better by sleight of hand. David Stockman, in an article in the Business Insider, makes the point that the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ numbers on unemployment are an outright fabrication.

Ladies and gentlemen, if government will so blatantly lie about a national statistic, what else will they lie about? Just about anything! Truth is the first casualty of government hell-bent on increasing its power.

The three branches of the federal government that were supposed to check the rise of each others power through the Separation of Powers doctrine now work in concert to support and enhance each others power. But the greatest increase in power has risen within the confines of the Executive Branch. Since the days of Abraham Lincoln, each succeeding president has added power to the executive branch by increasing the size of the President’s cabinet. Each cabinet secretary serves at the pleasure of the president and will do his bidding when directed. If the President wants to get around the Legislative Branch, he just gives a directive to one of his cabinet Secretaries to promulgate a “rule” which has the force of law. Or he just writes an Executive Order. (FDR, Obama’s hero, wrote more than 3,600 Executive Orders) If the president wants a better judicial outcome, he just packs the U. S. Supreme Court with appointments for justices-for-life ideologues who will support his ideology or agenda.

The second way that the executive branch has increased its power is by the legislative branch abdicating its constitutional legislative power and granting more unconstitutional power to the president or his cabinet bureaucracies. Around the time of Christ, the Roman Republic of almost 500 years became the Roman Empire when the Roman Senate abdicated all of its power and granted it to the new Emperor, Octavius (Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus – 27 BC). Could history be repeating itself again and man has learned nothing in 2,100 years? Could it be that in time, an American Republic could morph into the American Empire when the Congress abdicates all of its legislative power to the executive branch under his majesty, Caesar Obama, or some other equally narcissistic and arrogant ”ruler”?

Each year the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government, coupled with an out-of-control federal bureaucracy, take more and more control of every aspect of our daily lives by passing law after law or promulgating rule after rule. No area of human behavior is safe from the long arms of the law and rule makers that make up the black hole of centralized government.

From the top down, the federal government now controls public education, the money, the land, the water, the food, the energy and the health care of every American. America has reached the point where the government can do anything it pleases, but each American must ask permission from the government to do anything they want to do.

Much of this growing federal control has been done in cooperation with the hopelessly corrupt United Nations, along with the world ruling class and the moneychangers. Government can back up that control with the most powerful military on the planet if they so choose. Even a totally armed population could not stop the onslaught of the combined forces of the Army, Navy, Marines, Air Force, Coast Guard and civilian law enforcement, that is, if those in power could convince the military and civilian law enforcement to fire upon their own citizens. That is a big “if,” we will admit, but the possibility still exists.

The more laws and rules that government passes result in higher taxes, more aggressive law enforcement, more law-abiding citizens being turned into law-breakers and more brainwashing of the entire population to convince them that all of the new laws are legal, ”necessary and proper.” To further government’s hold on power, they encourage neighbors to be snitches by ratting on their neighbors over real or unreal violations of too many laws. Instead of neighbors helping neighbors to work against government as we used to do when there was the fire of freedom in our bellies, the government now turns neighbor against neighbor and directs their attention away from government. Can a police state (think the Third Reich) be far behind if Americans don’t wise up and soon?

But it isn’t always government with an evil agenda that sends us reeling headlong into the black hole of corruption and enslavement. Sometimes it is just plain stupidity of and by government and it takes on all the appearances of a bunch of crazed inmates running an asylum.

In many of our columns we have struggled with why there seem to be no genuine solutions to our problems even though many plausible solutions are proffered. This ABC News Watchdog video might explain why. Government passes a law and then moves onto another law without regard to the reasons for, or the consequences of, the previous law they just passed. (Should we say Obamacare?) It’s as if someone who is not playing with all of his marbles was pulling the handle on a slot machine and garbage dumped in his lap with each pull. But instead of stopping and analyzing why the machine is malfunctioning, he just keeps pulling the handle until he is buried in garbage, a classic example of insanity.

Americans are being drawn in and sucked up into the black hole of growing government tyranny, ineptness ….. and stupidity. The trap has been set and there is “cheese” on the trigger. As more and more Americans are drawn to the sweet, enticing smell of the “cheese,” each will succumb to the snap of the trap, as they tumble helplessly down and down into the black hole, finally consumed by absolute power resulting from their own greed. Man’s short experiment with freedom will have become a sidebar in some history book, as civilization rapidly decays into chaos and anarchy, where the world is run by an Oligarchy (ruling class) and martial law is the rule rather than the exception. Complete enslavement of the masses will have become a reality if freedom in America dies.

But government could never set the trap with “cheese” and be successful if it weren’t for the not-so-smart “mice” that are always looking for a free meal. In fact, the government has been so successful that 70% of the Federal budget is spent on those dependent “mice” that are always sniffing around the “cheese” in the trap. According to Investor.com, under Obama, the number of dependent “mice” has shot up 23% with 67 million “mice” now dependent on some form of government assistance. That translates into 67 million ”mice” that won’t “bite” the hand that feeds them and these “mice” get to vote. If you wonder whom they will vote for, you are naive.

In spite of the possibility of America’s ultimate demise as a free and prosperous nation, there still may be reason to hope for a more positive outcome. There is the distinct aroma of determined resistance sweeping across America and that resistance is manifested in more and more people taking it upon themselves to start holding government accountable for what they are doing, or not doing, at the local, state and federal level. As a result, the left is growing more nervous and turning up the heat on the resistors ….. and ”feeding” more propaganda to the naive and un-enlightened.

Even though there are growing signs of resistance, “The Parallax Prophecies” predicts that if Americans who care about freedom don’t find a way to peacefully render impotent this black hole of ever-increasing government power, a certain segment of the population will be forced to go the way of all previous civilizations to restore freedom and break up, by other means, the arrogant monopoly of an out-of-control, drunk-with-power, centralized government. Unfortunately, if such an event were to occur in today’s world, there is no guarantee that their actions to restore freedom by other means will be a replay of 1776. Instead, there is a distinct possibility that the freedom-grabbing black hole of government will just get stronger and stronger and larger and larger, unless a superior force is mounted against it. Two thousand twelve (2012) could be the turning point towards a paradigm shift in the American mindset. Freedom might just be born anew, but we’re not holding our breath.

——————————-

Ron Ewart, President

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RURAL LANDOWNERS

P. O. Box 1031, Issaquah, WA 98027

425 837-5365 or 1 800 682-7848

http://www.narlo.org/

http://www.narloltd.com

2012-02-09T20:07:00.000-08:00

This is part one of a three part story which will present evidence discovered within the vital records archives of the United States, Great Britain and the Prefecture of Hiroshima, Japan which shows that Barack Obama exploited the municipality of Hawaii and U.S. Vital Statistics reporting methods in order to counterfeit birth records in a criminal attempt to deceive the American people and fraudulently usurp the power of the U.S. Presidency.

by Penbrook Johannson
of THE DAILY PEN

New York, NY – Barack Obama’s ineligibility to be President remains the most troubling concern for the American people over the past four years. The issue outweighs concern over healthcare, the economy and the war on terror, combined.

Regardless of transient political and social lusts, immovable Constitutional prerequisites dictate that no office Obama holds, or policy he implements, is legitimate without proving that he is qualified to implement them, first. Compounding our constitutional crisis, an ineligible President only makes these problems worse, no matter what party he or she represents. Marco Rubio will come to understand, just as Obama has, that hypocrisy is not a part of the constitutional eligibility platform.

Despite spineless commiseration with Obama by the mainstream media complex, including abettors at Fox News, MSNBC, CNN, CBS and ABC, public sentiment demanding a formal investigation into the matter of Obama’s Natural-born status, and thus his eligibility, continues to grow beyond the control of our government and media.

Soon, the vast and shocking truth about Obama’s otherness, based in part on evidence revealed in this report, will begin to rupture the constructs of Obama’s massive deception.

Presented here for the first time, in coordination with longstanding evidence supporting charges of fraud against Obama, is documented proof demonstrating multiple discrepancies between the dates and locations of Obama’s alleged birth registration and uncorroborated claims that his birth actually occurred on the island of Oahu, Hawaii in 1961.

Along with valid proof that the image of Obama’s “Certificate of Live Birth” is a digitally manipulated forgery, analysis of data on the image in reference with 1961 vital statistics reporting methods reveals there are conflicts between the vital statistics data educed about Obama and his ambiguous birth narrative.

As this report will show, the proof of Obama’s fraudulence resides in the domain of publicly accessible records which show that the birth registration procedures, federal vital statistics reporting methods and organizational structure of the Hawaiian municipality expose these contradictions and reveal that Obama’s Hawaiian birth is a fabrication of modern administrative processes and that his actual natal biography has been actively and intentionally obscured by present-day governmental officials.

REGIONAL NUMBERING OF VITAL STATISTICS

Vital statistics reporting methods in 1961 dictated that when births were registered in Hawaii, the official vital record was coded with a nine digit number called a geographic reference. Hawaii’s vital records are reported to the main office of the Hawaiian Department of Health in Honolulu from five counties comprised of seven geographic reference numbers as shown in the Vital Statistics Instruction Manual for 1959-1963. In Hawaii the geographic areas, numbered in alphabetical order by name of county, were coded as follows:

The geographic reference table shows the alphabetical order in which the counties of Hawaii were numbered by the National Vital Statistics Division and how vital statistics were required by the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare to be reported using codes indicating the state (first and second digit), county (third, fourth and fifth digit) and city (sixth, seventh and eighth digit) and population (ninth digit) with population being designated as follows:
Cities with populations of 10,000 or more within each state are number in alphabetical order. Rural areas not identified in birth records which have a population up to10,000 are numbered 999 in each state. In 1961, there were only two incorporated areas in Hawaii, the City of Honolulu in the County of Honolulu, and the City of Hilo in the County of Hawaii, coded as follows:

As indicated by this code, in reference with the population codes, the city of Honolulu was reported by 1960 Census figures to have a population of 250,000 to 500,000 and the city of Hilo, 25,000 to 50,000 with the City of Honolulu being designated as the Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA).

Notice, according to the National Vital Statistics Division, Hawaii contained only two geographic references with populations specified as greater than 25,000. They are the incorporated area of Hilo in the County of Hawaii, which is located on the Island of Hawaii, and the incorporated city of Honolulu in the County of Honolulu on the island of Oahu which is also part of the state of Hawaii.
The incorporated area of Honolulu County covers the City of Honolulu for Region 3.

OUT OF ORDER: BIRTH REGISTRATION NUMBER EXPOSES OBAMA’S FRAUD

As first reported by The Daily Pen in 2010, in order to streamline accounting of millions of births reported by all the states in 1961, the National Vital Statistics Division (NVSD) of the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, as it was known, mandated a 50-percent reporting method from state agencies using even-numbered certificates only. This commonly practiced statistical accounting method was implemented periodically in order to accelerate the quantification and categorization of natal statistics while preserving the margins of accuracy of the data to be included in various reports and Census data.

In Hawaii in 1961, birth registration records were collected by the State of Hawaii’s Department of Health each week for births registered throughout the five regional offices between the previous Sunday at Midnight through Saturday at 11:59 p.m. Records from the five reporting counties were grouped in order by their geographic reference code into the seven groups shown above. Then the state of Hawaii’s Vital Statistics Registrar assigned birth registration numbers based, first, on regional occurrence with secondary consideration for chronological occurrence, as so stated in the 1961 Vital Statistics of the U.S. Report in Section 5, pg. 5-8.

In 1961, upon receipt of the states’ data by the U.S. DHEW, the final even-number total for each reporting region (divided by counties) in each state was simply multiplied by two, thereby assigning an equal statistical value for the unreported odd numbered certificates. The resulting number was published in the annual 1961 "Natal Statistics of the U.S. Report Volume 1: Natality" issued through the National Center for Health Statistics headed by Dr. Forrest Linder and members of the National Vital Statistics Division at the time.

Since state-level Departments of Health were mandated by the federal government to convey their data by the 50-percent reporting method using only even numbered registration numbers, the states' health departments were not able to utilize "chronological" birth numbering to account for births in 1961. This means that as birth registration requests arrived at states' main Department of Health offices, registrars had to first account them in order of receipt from regional office locations around the state. These were the offices in outlying and unincorporated areas (non-metropolitan areas) which most often provided birth registration services for rural, non-hospital, indigenous and foreign births since most main offices are nearest to major hospitals and city populations.

Understanding this regional birth registration system is critical when analyzing Obama birth records and it is essential to understanding why his birth registration number indicates that he has provided fraudulent birth data and, also, why it is out of sequence with other birth registrations.

REGIONAL VS. CHRONOLOGICAL BIRTH REGISTRATION

The 1961 Vital Statistics Report of the United States reveals there were 17,616 births registered in the state of Hawaii between midnight, January 1, 1961 and 11:59 p.m., December 31st, 1961. This means that the State of Hawaii reported 8,808 even-numbered registrations to the U.S. Department of Health.

Of the total births registered in the State of Hawaii, 14,906 were registered in the County of Honolulu, alone. This means that almost 85% of births are registered in just one of the five Hawaiian counties using 7,453 of the 8,808 even-numbers available leaving only 1355 even numbers for the remaining six regional birth registration areas.

If the state of Hawaii had assigned birth registration numbers in chronological order, without consideration for the regional origin of the birth registration, many of the remaining 2710 births in the four remaining counties would have been assigned a disproportionate number of odd registration numbers because they were “outnumbered” by Honolulu County births by 5.5 to 1.

Statistically, for every 16 births registered in the City of Honolulu, only one birth is registered in the City of Hilo. If the birth in Hilo were chronologically numbered among those other 16 from Honolulu and just happened to receive an odd number in 1961, it would never be reported as ever occurring. Worse yet, what if all 524 births in Hilo were randomly assigned odd numbers because of their chronological occurrence with the 14,906 births from Honolulu County. This is not impossible considering there are 7,453 odd numbers available.

The data reveals there were a total of 17,616 births registered and reported to the U.S. DHEW from the state of Hawaii in 1961. Of these, 9348 were registered outside the incorporated area of Honolulu leaving more than half the birth registrations of the Hawaiian Islands from places outside the shoreline boundaries of Oahu and, thus, outside the geographic authority of the Honolulu based Department of Health.

As shown in the table below, births were registered, numbered and reported from seven different regional groupings among five counties (Hawaii, Honolulu, Kalawao, Kauai and Maui) which are numbered in alphabetical order, according to NVSD protocols outlined in the Vital Statistics Instruction Manual, Part II, Section C - “Geographic Code”.

In order to avoid this statistical inaccuracy, states adopted regional birth numbering which assigned an equal percentage of even numbers within all birth regions, not just cities and densely populated areas. This allowed rural and urban births to be accounted accurately regardless of their chronological occurrence.

The only way to make sure there was an accurate accounting, based on the federal health department’s request that states use even-numbered reporting of natal statistics was for the states’ main DOH office to number births in order of receipt from regional offices, first, then consider them chronologically, second.

Therefore, the State of Hawaii, like many states, implemented a regional numbering of birth registrations to ensure that births outside of the urban area of Honolulu would be accounted for using the 50-percent reporting method using even-numbers only.

This "regional" ordering of birth registrations prevented an over-counting of native urban births because urban births occur in a much higher density and frequency and, therefore, are statistically more likely to receive an even number if only chronological birth numbering were used.

Compounding this problem in Hawaii is the fact that births can occur in a region stretching more than 1500 miles across the Pacific Ocean and still be called “Hawaiian” births. Hawaii’s municipal government does not operate like one in a mainland state. In 1961, the geographic chain of Hawaiian Islands stretched far beyond the reach of Honolulu’s municipal authority. The main offices of the Hawaiian Health Department had only enough resources to take registration information at face value and create documentation without investigation. It did this so often, it eventually became permissible by law via HRS 338 and Administrative Rule 91.

Also, five of Hawaii’s regional birth registration districts are separated from the City of Honolulu by oceanic boundaries and open water of the Pacific Ocean. In 1961, the municipal government of the State of Hawaii did not have computer technology and had tremendous difficulty in implementing native birth verification and immigration laws.

The regions from which birth registrations were received by the Hawaiian Department of Health’s main office in 1961 were:

1. Births registered in the County of Hawaii and within the incorporated area of Hilo on the island of Hawaii – 524 births.
2. Remaining births registered in the County of Hawaii (births registered outside of Hilo yet on the big Island of Hawaii) from the areas surrounding Hilo - 668 births.
3. Births registered in the County of Honolulu and within the incorporated City of Honolulu on the Island of Oahu – 8,268 births (Registered in Kapiolani Medical Center…i.e. the Nordyke twins 10638 and10637);
4. Remaining births registered in the County of Honolulu in remaining areas surrounding the incorporated City of Honolulu on the island of Oahu – 6,638 births (Not registered in Kapiolani Medical Center…i.e. Obama 10641);
5. Births registered in the county of Kalawao on the north shore of the island of Moloka’I – 0 births.
6. Births registered in the County of Kauai which consists of the islands of Kauaʻi, Niʻihau, Lehua, and Kaʻula – 604 births, and;
7. Births registered in the County of Maui which consists of the islands of Maui, Kahoolawe, Lānai, Moloka’i (except for a portion of Molokai that comprises Kalawao County), and Molokini – 914 births.
The following table illustrates Hawaii’s regional statistics and shows the order of the numbering sequence as it applied in 1961.

OBAMA’S BIRTH REGISTERED BY PLACE OF RESIDENCE, NOT PLACE OF OCCURENCE

The 1961 Vital Statistics Report of the United States reveals in Section 5-5 that birth statistics are classified by the mother’s usual place of residence. This means that, in Hawaii in 1961, if the mother of a child resided in Region 4 (in Honolulu County but outside of the Incorporated area of the City of Honolulu), but came into the City of Honolulu (Region 3) to have the child at one of the urban hospitals, the vital statistics for that baby were recorded by the Department of health as occurring in Region 4, not Region 3. However, if the father was a resident alien, foreign student or undocumented immigrant, the mother’s usual place of residence was considered the place of occurrence, regardless of the birth location.

Contrarily, if someone wanted to conceal a birth or obscure its data, registering it in an outlying area would accomplish this.

Therefore, chronological birth registration numbering creates a statistical accuracy problem when attempting to account the births which are not registered in major hospitals because those less frequent births might just happen to occur in a chronological order which renders a disproportionate quantity of them with odd numbers, therefore, preventing them from being reported by the 50-percent, “even-number-only” method.

Because of the even numbered reporting in Hawaii in 1961, if the birth registration numbers were assigned chronologically, and those from Hilo, Kalawao, Kauai and Maui counties were lumped in with the births registered in Honolulu county, they would not be accurately counted by the U.S. Department of Health, Welfare and Education because their fewer numbers would be vulnerable to odd numbering in higher proportion.

If this were allowed to happen without regional consideration, those rural or foreign birth registrations would not be reported to the U.S. Dept. of Health, and therefore, they would not receive "credit" for future federal services and funding of various programs.

Therefore, in 1961, the “50-percent” reporting method of even-numbered certificates only, forced state vital records agencies to use the Regional numbering system, instead of exclusive chronological numbering in order to make sure an accurate proportion of even numbered rural, foreign and non-hospital births were accounted for census and natal statistics reporting. This is one reason the U.S. DHEW added data categories to the official "Certificate of Live Birth" template in the 1950's in order to account for non-hospital births in comparison to the higher number of urban births.

The table below demonstrates the importance of clarifying birth registrations by regions in Hawaii. The U.S. Department of Health wanted to know the natality rates and status of births not only in highly populated areas, but in rural areas and non-metropolitan counties of each state.

In the alleged year of Obama's birth, regional clarification of birth data allowed Hawaii, with its scattered indigenous population and foreign birth registration history, a way to modulate the birth registrations from foreign, unnattended and non-hospital births without allowing them to be lost in odd numbers of the 17,616 total births that year and therefore promoted the Hawaiian municipal government’s need for federal funding for its population growth and expanding municipality.

As a result, Obama's birth was registered in a region whose certificates received a higher number even though his birth outside of Honolulu was recorded as allegedly occurring earlier than the Nordyke twins, because the regional offices, including the one which registered the Nordykes, had a lower regional reference number and served the main hospital at Kapi'olani.

Obama's birth did not occur in Kapi'olani Medical Center and these data prove it.

THE NORDYKES BORN IN KAPIOLANI MEDICAL CENTER, OBAMA WAS NOT

Moreover, the newspapers printed their birth announcements in the same order the certificates were numbered and in the order they were regionally registered by the main office of the State of Hawaii’s Department of Health in 1961.

Notice where Obama's announcement occurs within the columns of the two newspapers compared to the dates of other births in other announcements. Several births are dated days after his yet they are printed above his. This is because they were registered either in a lower numbered regional office or in the office serving Kapi'olani Medical Center and, therefore, received a lower registration number despite occurring after his birth, chronologically.

At the top of the column, why does the birth announcement for the Kitson’s August 6th birth occur before the Ayau’s July 31st birth? Because the birth of the Kitson’s son was registered with a lower number than the Ayau’s registration.

The Nordyke twins’ birth announcements appear several days later, on August 18th because, although they were born just a day later than Obama, their births were still numbered higher than other births at Kapi'olani that week because they occurred on the last day of the reporting period on August 5, which was a Saturday. The regional batches of births were printed in their respective groups by the newspapers with respect for column space available. This is yet another indication that the Nordyke births were registered in the Honolulu county main office while Obama's was registered in an outlying regional office. His birth announcement appear before the Nordykes even though his number is higher, because his birth was registered with a batch of regional births requiring less column space to include the entire week’s registration from that region.

The fact that Obama's birth registration number is higher indicates that his birth was not in the same order with other births in Region 3 because his birth did not actually occur in the City of Honolulu. In fact, his birth was registered some time after once a registration number became available in another region. In this case, probably region 4.

Therefore, this statistical evidence is a powerful indicator that Obama’s birth was not registered as a result of a birth in Kapiolani because his registration occurred after registration numbers were already applied to births for the week ending Saturday, August 5th, which did occur in Kapiolani medical center.

FOREIGN BIRTH SHELTER IN THE PACIFIC

It should be no surprise, given the Obama eligibility saga, that the word “Honolulu” means “place of shelter” in native Hawaiian language. In June of 1959, two months before Hawaii was officially granted U.S. statehood, the governor-to-be of Hawaii and the mayor of the Prefecture of Hiroshima, Japan met to discuss, among other things, a way to “streamline” immigration and citizenship rights for residents between the two states and, thus, help struggling Japanese citizens find refuge in the wake of the destruction wrought by World War II. The relationship between Hawaii and Japan was originally seeded by the “People to People Program” established by Eisenhower administration in the 1950s to promote peace and mutual understanding between citizens in the two former enemy nations.

In that same year, government officials of Honolulu and the city of Hiroshima officially adopted each other’s city as a “sister city” paving the way for an open and cooperative induction of bureaucracy, commerce and migration between the two municipalities. However, records show that the symbiotic history between these metropolises extends even deeper into Hawaii’s history than the 1950s and reveals that thousands of Japanese immigrants, since the mid 1800s, have entered Hawaii and received official native birth and citizenship status from the Hawaii Office of the Secretary of State via the Hawaiian Department of Health.

Most mainlanders do not realize that Hawaii has been under American statutory and legislative influence since 1898, 61 years before officially becoming a state. In 110 plus years, Hawaii has had 19 governors, 12 appointed prior to statehood, seven elected since statehood. Stanford B. Cole was the first governor of Hawaii, appointed by the McKinley administration from 1900 to 1903, 59 years before Hawaiian statehood. William Quinn became Hawaii’s first elected governor upon statehood in 1959. Between these two administrations, Hawaiian laws evolved out of what most Americans would consider foreign influence and cultural exclusivity.

From its earliest history, Hawaii cooperated with Asiatic nations in creating a model of immigration which, while intended to improve the lives of suffering immigrants, actually evolved out of social values and cultural homogeny into the very laws and administrative regulations of the state of Hawaii which would eventually facilitate Barack Obama’s illegal presidency.

Essentially, by exploiting Hawaii’s cultural history of drawing poor foreigners through its municipal exclusivity, without accountability to mainland America, Obama was able to deceive America. By using Hawaii’s municipal history and vital records processes to create a façade of legitimacy, Obama simply did what foreign immigrants have been doing for 100 years in Hawaii. Lying about who they really are, and where they actually come from.

The result of this deception was that he was able to hypnotize a bowing liberal consensus into accepting, wholesale, that he was eligible to be president by exploiting their willful ignorance and emotionalism.

ANCHORS A WAY!…TO ARTIFICIAL U.S. CITIZENSHIP

The exploitation of babies by their foreign-born parents as a means to achieve sanctuary within the U.S. and its affiliated territory and states has been around long before border jumping from Mexico. It appears that Hawaii, not Arizona, was the first anchor-baby harbinger in the U.S.

As stated, Hawaii has strong historic ties to Hiroshima. In as early as the decade between 1885 and 1894, approximately 30,000 people arrived in the island nation from Japan, primarily to work in the sugar industry.

Among these earliest recorded Japanese-to-U.S. immigrants were more than 6000 Japan-born children who received native Hawaiian birth records and, thus, native Hawaiian citizenship allowing their parents a legal mooring for residency and land ownership. Many foreign-born Japanese adults also received birth records which legally stated they were born in the territory of Hawaii. An estimated one-third, 10,000 of these 30,000 immigrants, came from Hiroshima.

New and not-so-new arrivals could receive birth records from the Hawaiian territory’s municipal records office by presenting nothing more than a handwritten or verbal testimonial of native birth from one witness (a medical doctor was not required), and an application signed by the applicant, the witness and the Territory’s Secretary of Records.

Archive records and recently filed vital statistics reports by the Hawaiian Office of Vital Statistics via the Sinclair and Hamilton libraries show that more than 357,000 Japanese citizens entered the U.S. through Hawaii illegally between 1911 and 1972. With them, were more than 41,000 young and newborn children who were relocated with many being granted Hawaiian native birth status and, thus, citizenship in the Hawaiian Islands and, eventually, by default as a result of statehood, citizenship of the U.S. At some point, soon after 1959, this infiltration of nameless hordes triggered a formal response from the government of the State of Hawaii to introduce “accommodation” policies. Therefore, Hawaii’s administrative authority formed the “Certificate of Hawaiian Birth” program in which anyone willing to apply could receive a Hawaii birth certificate regardless of where they were actually born.

“This is unprecedented in American immigration history. Essentially, immigrants who were already present in Hawaii at the time of statehood were automatically granted U.S. citizenship by default when the islands became a U.S. state, and they were provided false birth documentation as a primary form of official U.S. identification,” says Dan Crosby after his investigation of the history and vital records processes in Hawaii.

“Municipal officials and law enforcement personnel working in Hawaii simply did not question identity and citizenship at that time. It would have been like verifying the source and identity of a grain of sand on a Hawaiian beach,” Crosby continued.

“Once you look at the history of this place in depth, it really is not surprising to learn that many of these ‘citizens-by-presence’ simply claimed that their children were born in Hawaii so they could have an identity as Hawaiian citizens, nor is it surprising, once you look at the dynamics between Hawaii and Japan, that they were issued simple birth records stating so. In fact, it seems logical that they allowed it,” says Crosby.

“Unfortunately, however, it is a violation of the U.S. Constitution when one of those foreign-born Hawaiian orphans tries to run for president.”

Crosby explains that the large volume of people actually prevented an extensive legal verification process because the time and resources required to accomplish it were simply not available. He also gives compelling reasons why it was actually a benefit to Hawaii to declare foreign-born children as native Hawaiians.

“Money. Duh!” quips Crosby.

“The bigger the population native to Hawaii, the more financially viable the demographic is to the federal bureaucracy. Tax payers and municipal services keep the federal government in business. Keep in mind, there was little to no official immigration enforcement in Hawaii before statehood. Hawaii just didn’t have the municipal resources from 1898 to the 1960’s to verify the legitimacy of applicants’ birth claims and parentage, so they just handed out birth certificates like candy,” says Crosby.

“Eventually, the informal social precedence became statutory law and the state of Hawaii, after 1959, simply made it a policy and formal process to issue native birth records to foreign born children because it was so burdensome to enforce rigid verification standards for so many entering the islands from all sides. Remember, this is not Oklahoma or North Dakota…this place is in the middle of thousands of square miles of open water directly accessible to more than 80 different countries. This little island didn’t stand a chance. You could’ve had Asian immigrants walking into Hawaii after swimming the Maui Channel between islands. Once they got here, who the hell is gonna know they aren’t native? There is no immigration enforcement body. Who would care when everyone else is lying too?”

Wayne Miyao, president of Honolulu Hiroshima Kenjin Kai and chairman of the Hiroshima-Hawaii Sister State Committee says, “The numbers seeking a new life were staggering. Thousands of Japanese citizens who had been struggling for years since the end of the war were desperate to enter the U.S. via the remote, unchecked Hawaiian Territory after 1945. This should not be a surprise to anyone considering what happened in Hiroshima.”

OBAMA BENEFITTED FROM A CULTURE OF "ATOMIC GUILT"

Supporting Hawaii’s explanation for its failed immigration and vital records enforcement policies between 1945 and 1964 was that those living and working in Hawaii were torn between their political moorings with the U.S. and their sympathy for atomic bomb survivors from Japan.

“This is at the heart of the two city’s sisterhood celebration here,” says Crosby, “The sentiments over this issue were so deeply held and so evocative that it was essentially made a law of social nature that Japan had open and unfettered access to Hawaii. From there, I believe the social attitudes and municipal policy of Hawaii officially supported, if not actively promoted, the extralegal assimilation of all foreigners into the American landscape. Ultimately, these attitudes and ‘creeping warrants’ is how Obama ultimately became an illegitimate president. Guilt and shame, not hope and change.”

In 1985, the Prefecture of Hiroshima presented Honolulu with the Hiroshima Peace Bell. A bell-ringing ceremony is held each year at the Izumo Taishakyo Mission near Chinatown to mark the 1945 atomic bombing of Hiroshima. Included in the ceremony is a traditional Shinto offering of fruits, vegetables, sake and rice for purification and blessing.

In 2001, the Hiroshima Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Hiroshima Prefecture, and the City of Hiroshima presented to the Honolulu Japanese Chamber of Commerce a replica of the Torii Gate at Hiyajima, a World Heritage Site, as a symbol of our everlasting friendship. In 2002, the Honolulu Japanese Chamber of Commerce presented the same token of friendship to the City and County of Honolulu. This $165,000, tax funded, 26-foot-high structure, a symbol of Japan’s illegal immigration into the U.S. and the preeminent symbol of the Shinto religion, now stands on public land at the intersection of King and Beretania streets, in Moiliili.
In 2009, the cities of Hiroshima and Hawaii celebrated the Fiftieth Anniversary of the Sister City Relationship between the City and County of Honolulu and the City of Hiroshima.

“Hiroshima was Honolulu’s first sister city, and we’re very proud of our warm and strong relationship,” Mayor Hannemann said. “It’s very important that we celebrate this historic occasion appropriately and continue to share our aloha with the wonderful people of Hiroshima.”

....and a few other people, it appears.

READ PART II COMING SOON

2012-02-09T11:06:00.000-08:00

Do Most Americans Know About Michelle Obama’s Photo-Op in the White House?

FAUX FIRST LADY USES “NORMALLY DIGNIFIED” ROOM IN PRESIDENTIAL RESIDENCE TO VIDEOTAPE “COMEDY” SHOW

by Sharon Rondeau

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

(Feb. 8, 2012) — What would our Founding Fathers think if they could see the wife of the de facto President of the United States utilizing various rooms in the White House to promote a fitness program which included a tug-of-war in the historic Blue Room?

The Blue Room is oval-shaped and was the location of President Grover Cleveland’s wedding in 1886. It has been called “the choicest room in the palace.” Do the Obamas respect this place with its rich history? Even though the Blue Room “has been the customary place for presidents to formally receive guests,” Michelle’s tug-of-war, recorded for her appearance with Jimmy Fallon, found a place there.

What would George Washington think if he could see how Michelle Obama behaves and how she makes use of the people’s house, the White House? Who is winning her game of tug-of-war, and why? What is the significance of the red tie marker on the tug-of-war rope? And who is winning?

Michelle has shown a willingness to “make a complete fool out of” herself to allegedly battle childhood obesity. But is that really necessary? Is it expected of a “First Lady?”

Do Michelle Obama’s exercise routines and photo-ops have to be done in formal rooms in the White House? Cannot games of catch and sack hop races be done in a more fitting place such as a recreation room?

Where does Michelle normally “work out?” Does she carry herself with the dignity befitting a “First Lady,” or would she rather look “ridiculous?” Nevertheless, “it matters” to Michelle whether you win or lose a fitness challenge.

Besides appearing on late-night TV shows, what else is Michelle doing in the interest of the United States? She has more staff than any other “First Lady” in the history of the United States, so perhaps she has spare time.

While Michelle claims that she “left a job at a big law firm for a career in public service,” she might not have had a choice about leaving the legal profession.

Michelle Obama founded the “Let’s Move!” initiative two years ago which includes a contest complete with a reported $500,000 in prizes to be awarded. And who could resist an award for adhering to a challenge posed by the “President?” After all, even “educators” are rewarded by the Obamas!

Does anyone know how Obama and his friends celebrated his alleged birthday last summer?

As reported in USA Today, Obama and his famous guests “did the Electric Slide” barefoot in the Rose Garden after “sending the White House press corps home early.”

One researcher claims that Obama’s birthday did not actually occur last summer, but rather, in the fall, and that his real name is not “Barack Hussein Obama,” but Bari M. Shabazz, born October 28, 1959. Does Obama bear a resemblance to this woman, or this man?

How much do “Obama” and his wife “sacrifice,” as they tell Americans they should, particularly during times of economic stress?

Are the Obamas’ programs all about helping America, or all about how much of the spotlight they can have? Does Obama fulfill his duties or simply “hang out with America?” Is he capable of actually leading the country?

Who is paying for Michelle’s three-day tour which begins on February 9 and includes “guest stars” and “sports celebrities?”

Is Obama following his wife’s advice in regard to healthy eating? How much control do they wish to have over food outlets under the mantra of promoting “family values?”

Who is actually running the country as Obama has lunch with his fans? Why has his schedule been filled in only day by day for the last several weeks? What is he really accomplishing? And why are so many items on his schedule “closed press?”

Does Obama have nothing else to do than to “fire sweets across the span of the room” (East Room of the White House), where the “bodies of…Abraham Lincoln and John Kennedy have lain in state?”

Now the East Room is a place where Obama enjoys shooting marshmallows with an air cannon at a science fair.

Why is his appointment of Richard Cordray hailed as a positive accomplishment when it could have been unconstitutional? Is the Obama regime being truthful when it tells the people:

The Senate has effectively been in recess for weeks, and is expected to remain in recess for weeks. In an overt attempt to prevent the President from exercising his authority during this period, Republican Senators insisted on using a gimmick called “pro forma” sessions, which are sessions during which no Senate business is conducted and instead one or two Senators simply gavel in and out of session in a matter of seconds. But gimmicks do not override the President’s constitutional authority to make appointments to keep the government running. Legal experts agree. In fact, the lawyers who advised President Bush on recess appointments wrote that the Senate cannot use sham “pro forma” sessions to prevent the President from exercising a constitutional power.”

Do we need a “consumer watchdog,” or is Obama simply growing the government in keeping with his Marxist ideology? Is he attempting to brainwash and propagandize America’s children?

How much have he and his wife spent as Americans become poorer and poorer? Is everyone equal, but some people are more equal than others?

Even the Los Angeles Times, which refused to release the video of Obama and Rashid Al-Khalidi allegedly at a dinner where they denigrated Israel prior to the 2008 election, is asking “Just what is going on at the White House these days?”

And what else are the Obamas doing both inside and outside of the White House? What else do the American people not know about them, and how much has the mainstream media protected them? How much information was hidden before the 2008 election?

Was Obama’s purported birth father really a friend of his true biological father? And is the state of Hawaii hiding something which would confirm that they have been lying for Obama?

Will that information emerge before the 2012 election, or will Obama and his wife Michelle “win” again?

2012-02-09T10:54:00.000-08:00

Israel Insider
Bari M. Shabazz, fugitive from Hawaiian justice, had to "die" so Barack Obama could run

Posted by Israel Insider on November 9, 2011 at 11:00pm

Two astonishing pieces of evidence -- both connected to someone using the identity of Bari Shabazz -- the same last name as the one used by Malcolm X -- have just emerged which may make sense of some of the unsolved mysteries surrounding the life and identity of the man who now goes by the name of Barack Hussein Obama II.

Israel Insider was among the first publications in the world to put together a coherent, if inconclusive, case that Obama might in fact be the illegitimate son of Malcolm X. The starting point was the astonishing physical resemblance, in facial and body structure, in gestures and mannerisms, and even in speaking style. The startling visual evidence is here.

The theory advanced was that Obama was known by “insiders” to be of royal lineage, the sole son of Malcolm X, who took on the Islamic name El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz. Malcolm had six daughters, including twins Malikah and Malaak, born after his assassination. Observers have been struck by the resemblance of the twins to Obama’s own daughters. And a smirking mug shot of Malikah, 45, arrested this year on the anniversary of her father’s murder, looks remarkably like the man who would be her half-brother.

If Malcolm X, who harshly criticized Nation of Islam leader Elijah Muhammad, for siring illegitimate children, including with white woman, his own fatherhood would indeed be something he would want to conceal. And for the sole son to have been hidden all these years, known only to a chosen few, would uniquely explain why Obama himself – an undistinguished student and party boy in his youth --- was selected for exceptional treatment by Muslim potentates, communists and anarchists, and given a free ride to Columbia and Harvard Law School, for reasons that evidently had nothing to do with academic accomplishments.

The new evidence starts and ends with revelation of a traffic accident – apparently a “major” one – in Honolulu. The driver, one Bari M. Shabazz, may have been injured. But he was also arrested, for driving without a license. In a non-jury proceeding in traffic course, Bari Shabazz produced a New York Driver’s License, and the prosecution in the State of Hawaii evidently decided not to prosecute him.

This evidence is linked to the death report of Bari M. Shabazz, although irregularities in the death report apparently left some questions about whether this person really died, or whether the identity was just “put to death.”

The possible use of the identity of Bari M. Shabazz by the man today known as Barack Hussein Obama II might explain a great deal.

It may explain why so much of his past has been concealed. Driving without a license is the least of the secrets that would have needed to be hidden.

But the use of the name Shabazz would have revealed his greatest secret of all, his blood-relation to his famous and fatally controversial father.

A major traffic accident might also explain the large scar still visible on his scalp. But much more than the physical scar would be the need to explain the legacy of deception and dissimulation, the concealment of his true identity, a lifelong double-life.

If Malcolm X is indeed his father – and there is photographic evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham met him in New York when he spoke there in 1960, and Malcolm was a friend of Barack Obama senior and an admirer of Obama's father, a Mau Mau leader – that would make little Barack, or Bari, a natural born citizen. But it would expose him to far more serious charges of deception, twenty years as a fugitive from Hawaiian justice, and a lifelong pursuit of hiding who he really is.

Certainly the secret is of a magnitude that would justify the immense cover-up and stonewalling that has characterized Obama sealing of his past and the withholding of his personal and professional records.

The evidence is circumstantial, and there is still much investigative work to be done to tie all the evidence together. There is no clear link between Bari M. Shabazz and Barack “Barry” Obama, although as we will see there are some remarkable "coincidences." The new evidence opens a Pandora’s Box might disprove the birther claim that Obama was not a natural born citizen, but what it reveals may be far more damning.

The current trail was started by one Martha Trowbridge, who did some digging in public records and came up with the evidence of the existence of one Bari M Shabazz, who was listed as living, as an infant and small child, just a street away from Malcolm X: he on 98th Street in Elmhurst, New York, while Malcolm was on 99th.

Malcolm X knew Barack Obama Senior. Barack Obama was the son of Mau Mau Kenyan Revolution Hero, Hussein Onyango Obama. In the early 1950's, Malcolm was publicly singing HOO's praises in Harlem - years before the Mau Mau hero’s son, Barack Obama I, arrived in America. It was he, apparently, who would be appointed to be the future White House resident’s “official” father.

in August 1994, at the age of 34, Trowbridge notes that Bâri′ M. Shabazz was reported to have died. From the Social Security Death Index database:

SHABAZZ, B M 28 Oct 1959 Aug 1994 (V) 34 (PE) (none specified) New York 084-54-5926

And why, Trowbridge asks, did Bari Shabazz need to die in August 1994? Well, she suggests, it may have to do with the fact that on August 21, 1994, the Illinois State Senate seat ‘officially’ opened up! Its occupant, Alice Palmer – for whom “Barack Obama” was working – could now set her sights on indicted Mel Reynolds’ Congressional seat. And Barack, successor of Bari, was primed and perfectly positioned to take her place, which he promptly did. Apparently after someone "knocked off" the poor Mr. Shabazz, at least on paper.

The Social Security Death Index record, she notes, states that the death information for Bâri′ M. Shabazz was coded “V”. V signifies “Verified: a report verified with a family member or someone acting on behalf of a family member.” The report is not coded “P”, which would signify: “(Proof): Death Certificate Observed”. In other words, the death was merely claimed: there was no proof offered.

Further, Trowbridge notes, once in the federal system, the record was flagged as ‘PE’, indicating an inconsistency exists between what was reported and what was recorded in the government’s files.

BM Shabazz (Bari M Shabazz)

B 10/28/59
D 8/94
SSN 084545926

Among Trowbridge’s discoveries, apparently from an Intellius public records search was this sequence of addresses:

1 3226 98TH ST APT 1 EAST ELMHURST, NY 11369

2 32 98 EAST ELMHURST, NY 11369

3 HQCO SUC BN QUANTICO, VA

4 1 HQ CO MCDEC QUANTICO, VA

5 HQ CO SERV BN QUANTICO, VA

6 99999 MILITARY APT QUANTICO, VA 22134

7 HQCO HQSVCBN MCDEC QUANTICO, VA 22134

8 HQCO SERV BN QUANTICO, VA

9 99999 MILITARY APT QUANTICO, VA 22134

Trowbridge notes that these seem like fake military addresses. Quantico VA is not not another military address. It's a huge marine base and home of the FBI's primary training center. The official records raise the possibility that Obama may, at some point, have been recruited into the US military, the FBI, or another secret service. That, perhaps, before being groomed and positioned for official office.

Mario Apuzzo, an attorney who has been active pursuing the Obama identity case, published a report on Trowbridge’s blog post. That was for the most part a distillation of Trowbridge’s more lyrical piece. But then another piece of the puzzle was sent to Apuzzo.

“On November 4, 2011, an anonymous source emailed me something very interesting. To substantiate the content of the email, the writer directed me to go to a web site of the Judiciary for the State of Hawaii and to do a search of cases that have been disposed of by that State’s traffic courts. The anonymous source had done just that and so the person provided me with the information which that traffic court shows on its web site.”

“I did go to the Hawaii traffic court’s web site which is called eCourt Kokua and I was eventually able to confirm the information that the anonymous source sent me. Access to the court’s web set may be gained by going to this link. (Once at the site, click “Agree” to the terms and conditions. Then click, “Search for case details by case ID or citation number.” Once there, enter at the prompt, Case ID or Citation Number(*): 1193041MO and hit Search.” The following report appears: (Click each image to enlarge)

Attorney Apuzzo explains the meaning of the court documents:

The court record indicates that the offense occurred on March 12, 1982. The event is characterized as an “Accident Major.” The charge was driving without a valid driver’s license. The case was first filed on Tuesday, March 16, 1982, in the First Circuit, and then continued to April 5, 1982. Bari Shabazz was supposed to be arraigned and enter a plea on April 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m., in Kane’ohe Traffic Court, Courtroom B, at the Kane’ohe Division, but apparently that did not happen, perhaps because the defendant was a no-show. The case was continued to May 5, 1982. On May 5, 1982, at 8:00 a.m., Bari Shabazz was supposed to again be arraigned and enter his plea in the same court room. He apparently did not appear and so the court issued a bench warrant on May 5, 1982, bearing number “BWO 050582.” The court ordered the “AP” (maybe meaning accused person) to show proof of “NEW YORK DRIVER’S LICENSE.”

That is the last we hear of the case. It appears that the defendant Shabazza never appeared. He was, in effect, a fugitive from justice in the State of Hawaii.

The report then shows that the prosecutor on April 9, 2003 – more than 20 years later -- filed an ex parte motion to recall the bench warrant and announced on the record “nolle prosequi.” As Apuzzo notes, this is a Latin phrase which is formally entered into a court record which means that the prosecutor in a criminal case “will no further prosecute” the case. So, the charge was dismissed upon the prosecutor’s ex parte “Nolle Prosequi” motion made on April 9, 2003. “Ex parte” means that only one side made the application which in this case was the prosecutor.

Why would a prosecutor bother with a 20 year old bench warrant for a nobody named Bari Shabazz. Well, it might have something to do with the fact that Barack Hussein Obama II was beginning his campaign to become a US Senator.

The final entry was for October 30, 2005, at 8:00 a.m., when the court noted that a $-0- balance was owed on the account, but noted: “Pls check.”

By that time, of course, anyone could check: Barack Obama was the freshly minted US Senator from Illinois.

Polarik Comment by Polarik on December 14, 2011 at 11:02pm

Polarik Comment by Polarik on December 14, 2011 at 10:53pm

Tricia Comment by Tricia on November 10, 2011 at 1:47am

Well done, Israel Insider! That would make the age about right, too--especially when August is now claimed as the birth month of BHO. His alias was "born" in the month that Shabazz "died". Hmmm.

2012-02-08T19:33:00.000-08:00

A Nation of Fools

WHAT IS THE TRUE MEANING OF “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN?”

by Jedi Pauly, ©2012

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

(Feb. 8, 2012) — For some time now, I have been trying to explain the facts of life to the world regarding the true meaning and interpretation of Article II “natural born Citizen” requirements for the Office of President, and that Mr. Obama cannot possibly meet these requirements, as he was born to a foreign father who was never a U.S. citizen. I believe I have been viciously and unjustly attacked by the public at large and by some of the attorneys who have filed cases against Mr. Obama.

I contend and maintain that not one case filing so far has properly identified and argued the true and correct meaning and interpretation of Article II “natural born Citizen.” They have all missed the obvious, which I will once again state in light of the recent finding by Judge Malihi in the Georgia cases.

I am finding that I am forced to agree with Judge Malihi on one point: that Minor v Happersett is not a controlling case with regard to defining Article II “natural born Citizen.” It is, however, very useful in determining what is defining. One could even say it is controlling, but not for the reasons stated by the plaintiffs.

The judge is quite correct in his reading of the Minor case that the justices in Minor simply applied a general rule to Mrs. Minor: that those born within the U.S. to citizen parents are themselves “natives” or “natural born citizens” with a lower case “c” which, according to the Minor v Happersett judges, are synonymous terms. Such offspring are therefore members of the general class of “citizens” of the U.S. However, this does not mean that Mrs. Minor had the recognized and protected natural political right to be President that is implied in Article II by the term ”natural born Citizen” with a capital “C”. The Minor case was not even about Mrs. Minor’s right to be President; thus for this reason and others, it is not a controlling case.

In fact, the court in Minor went on to find that even though Mrs. Minor was already a citizen, and even a “natural born citizen” as a general category or type of “citizen” prior to the 14th Amendment, she still did not have any natural political rights recognized or protected by the Constitution. Nor did she possess any rights protected by the definition used by the court of what constitutes a “natural born citizen,” because the court found that she could not even vote, nor that she had any political rights secured by the Constitution at all. It required an Amendment to the Constitution to secure her natural political rights, her right to vote, regardless of the fact that she was determined to be a “natural born citizen.”

Obviously if she could not even vote, she could hardly be expected to be a candidate for the Office of President and qualify as a “natural born Citizen” by Article II. In fact, the court, using the findings in Minor v Happersett, actually proves that the definition of “one born in the country to parents who are citizens” IS NOT what is meant by “natural born Citizen” in Article II. In this sense, Minor might actually be a controlling case.

The Minor court determined that there were no political rights at all provided for or protected by the Constitution for Mrs. Minor, despite the fact that they determined that Mrs. Minor was a natural born citizen due to being born in the U.S.to parents who were citizens. If they could not see or find any political rights in the Constitution for Mrs. Minor, obviously the term in Article II, “natural born Citizen,” does not mean one who is born in the U.S. to parents who are citizens.

Likewise, if Article II “natural born Citizen” applied to Mrs. Minor and was what was meant by the court when they said that she was a natural born citizen, then the court would have found that she had the political right to be President secured, and so would have found that natural political rights were provided for her and thus could not then find that she could not vote. How might the Constitution provide for her a political right to be President but not a political right to vote? Obviously, the general term “natural born citizen,” with a lower case “c,” is a class of citizen that is synonymous in U.S. case law with native-born or even naturalized for most purposes, but it has nothing at all to do with the term in Article II spelled with an upper case “C” as in “natural born Citizen,” and the Minor v Happersett case proves this. It proves that these two terms, “natural born citizen” from U.S. case law that is removed from the context of Article II, and “natural born Citizen” within the context of Article II, are legal homonyms (they sound the same and are spelled the same but mean something different) and legal antonyms (two words or phrases that are opposite in meaning).

I will state again the obvious which everyone is ignoring or overlooking, now proved to be correct by Minor v Happersett. The term in Article II, “natural born Citizen,” is not a legal term that is undefined in the Constitution. It is not even a legal term, and it is perfectly defined within the context of Article II by the subject of natural political rights, history, Natural Law, International Law, and by the Declaration of Independence. It is an adjective phrase, “natural born,” which simply means created by natural birth inheritance as opposed to being created by statutory authority, modifying a specifically-restricted noun, “Citizen,” that is not a general use of the noun “citizen” but pointedly means a specific member out of the general class of citizens.

Specifically, the use of “Citizen” in Article II is meant to preclude natural born citizens of the federal territories or possessions, as they are not State citizens and not a party to the Constitution, so they cannot run for the Office of President. It is meant to include those from a State of the Union of States only, and did not mean a female; otherwise, the Minor court would have found a political right provided for females in the Constitution (the right to be President). Nor did it even at that time mean a Negro or Indian.

Minor v Happersett shows us and proves that the term “natural born Citizen” in Article II is being used in the most restrictive sense and means something other than someone born in the country to parents who are citizens. One need only examine convention according to International Law and Natural Law to see what it means. From Vattel’s The Law of Nations, Book I, Chapter 19, Section 212:

§212. Citizens and natives. The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see, whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. [Emphasis added]

In the Supreme Court Case Tuan Anh Nguyen v. INS, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg made the following statements affirming that the world recognizes “birthrights” of the father (not the mother), and bloodline rather than birthplace as the foundation for inherited citizenship by birthright, aka “natural-born citizenship.”

“Mr. Kneedler, I have a problem with it [Kneedler’s argument]. You would surely have a huge statelessness problem if you didn’t recognize that the child born abroad to U.S.citizens is a U.S.citizen because, as you point out, in most countries in the world, they go by blood, not by land of birth.”—“You call the child born abroad an alien, but in most places in the world that child would NOT be a citizen of the place in which that person is born; isn’t that so?”

“Well, I thought you said in your brief that in most places, and I think it’s right, they do not go on just soil, they go on parentage.”

“Mr. Kneedler, if Congress went back to the way it was when everything was determined by the father’s citizenship, go back to before 1934, suppose congress accepts your argument or we accept your argument and say plenary power, they can do whatever they damn please, so they say children born abroad of fathers who are U.S. citizens can become U.S. citizens, but not children who are born abroad of U.S. mothers where the father in an alien. That’s the way it used to be in the bad old days.”

“Suppose Congress wants to restore the way it was, the way it was for most of our nation’s history, that the father’s citizenship gets transferred to the child, not the mother’s?”

“You are talking to children not born to a marriage…”

One need only realize that the general rule is that if you are born in a country to citizen parents, then you are a natural born citizen of your parents’ country and of course you would qualify for the Office of the President –if you were a white male from a State prior to the 15th Amendment and 19th Amendment. This is the general rule used in Minor v Happersett but was shown in Minor to not specifically apply to Article II “natural born Citizen” in the case of females.

However, if you are not born in the country, or you do not have parents who are both citizens of that same country, then the rule and convention under both International Law and Natural Law and U.S. law prior to the 1930s to which Justice Ginsburg is referring is that the offspring “naturally follow the condition of their fathers.” In other words, you are born a natural citizen of your father’s country and that is also a natural born citizen, regardless of where you are born or who your mother is, and no one can deny you your natural inherited political birth rights to membership in your father’s clan and society and allegiance to your birth father and his country: not the soil territory of a foreign country; not even a foreign mother. So to be consistent with Minor v Happersett and all other controlling Supreme Court cases, we see that in Article II, the term “natural born Citizen” just means those who are born to citizen fathers. It did not originally mean females or Blacks, but in light of the 15th Amendment and the 19th Amendment, one must expand Article II nbC to include females and Black people so that these parts of the Constitution do not clash with Article II. Without including these Amendments to expand the scope of Article II, it would otherwise require a constitutional Amendment for females or Blacks to be President, especially since most Blacks were not even State citizens in many of the States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution and Article II.

So there you have it. Article II is using the most restrictive case of one born to a citizen father, and that is all that is required or necessary. That is what is meant by “natural born Citizen” in Article II. This is actually proven by Minor v Happersett. So Minor is controlling, but not for the reasons espoused in the Georgia filings because nbC has nothing at all to do with the place of birth or the citizenship of the mother, and the Minor court case proves this.

Judge Malihi is wrong because Obama does not qualify via his mother or place of birth. In fact, Mr. Obama is disqualified by his birth to a foreign father who was never a U.S. citizen, which, by International Law and Natural Law, makes him at birth to be a natural born member of his father’s country of Kenya despite his mother’s citizenship or place of birth. You cannot be born owing a natural allegiance to two countries simultaneously at birth. Which master would you serve? The convention recognized worldwide for thousands of years, and even under U.S. law, is to follow the father when you don’t have a unity of soil and parents.

Finally, in light of Minor v Happersett, Judge Malihi’s finding that Mr. Obama is Article II qualified because he is a natural born citizen via soil birth regardless of his foreign father takes on a surreal and ridiculous condition that is beyond absurd and can be easily seen via the following line of reasoning. Just apply some common sense and consider this:

The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States were written and signed entirely by males from State and Federal legislatures populated entirely by males who were citizens of the States and from the Confederation of States or federal government. The Declaration of Independence even states that governments are created according to natural laws by males, not females.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,[75] that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,”

[Notice the use of upper case "Men" and lower case "men" in the same sentence indicating that in the upper case instance the writer specifically means males.]

The purpose, of course, was to secure the natural political rights of males of this country. The Minor court found that the natural political rights that exist in the Constitution, such as the right to be President or to vote, for example, are only for U.S. males, proving that the entire purpose of the Constitution is to secure male citizens’ political rights. So Judge Malihi’s ruling implies that the political rights of the males are not provided for or secured by Article II nbC because the father’s citizenship does not matter when it comes to the Office of President, and any foreign father can sire a child with the political right to be President of the United States. In one fell swoop, Judge Malihi has eviscerated the political rights of U.S. males meant to be secured and protected by Article II nbC and the Constitution as a whole, and he has found that Article II and the Constitution were not created by the males of this American society to secure and protect their American political rights in order to pass on their American birthright heritage to their offspring, but instead was created to provide political rights for foreign males for their offspring! Can anyone now accept with a straight face that nbC in Article II just means born on the soil regardless of your father’s citizenship and that Obama qualifies? Does judge Malihi really expect us to accept that those who wrote nbC qualifications into Article II intended to not secure their own political rights as males who were citizens of this country, but rather intended to secure political rights for foreign non-citizen males and the offspring of those foreign males?

The judges must think that we are a Nation of Fools.

2012-02-07T06:58:00.000-08:00

FROM “THE PARALLAX PROPHECIES”

by Ron Ewart, ©2012

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

(Feb. 6, 2012) — “We should measure welfare’s success by how many people leave welfare, not by how many are added.” — Ronald Reagan

Every day, like vultures circling a fallen prey, they descend upon the centers of political power with their hands outstretched and without a hint of compunction or embarrassment, they beg, lobby, or riot for what they consider to be their “fair” portion of the sweat, blood and tears of those who are successful, self-reliant, responsible and independent. Black, white, tan, red or yellow, these mostly urban beggars and whiners epitomize the Occupy Wall Street crowd that say they aren’t getting their fair share of America’s wealth and demand that those that produce and earn their way must cough up more in taxes to pay those who won’t work and want something for nothing, using the power of government to get it, in a grand scheme of wealth redistribution. This “system,” if you can call it that, is socialism by any other name. If they don’t get their way, they resort to violence, property damage and mayhem. This display of “Gimee! Gimee! Gimee!” is disgusting and not worthy of a people who once called themselves free, sovereign and independent. If the Founding Fathers could see us now, they would wonder where they went wrong.

Over the last 50 years, America has spawned at least half of the population (if not more) as a mindless collective of whiners and takers, egged on by corrupt politicians scrounging for votes to remain in power. The legislatures, local, state and federal, exploit human weakness and greed and can’t wait to rob the public coffers to pay the bloodsuckers for what they have not earned. Government then uses the education system to brainwash the next generation, the court system and law enforcement to intimidate the current generation and passes never-ending social legislation to make the people and their offspring weaker and more dependent.

Unfortunately, these whiners and takers can vote and thus will always vote for the corrupt politician (and there are so many of them, “R’s” and “D’s”) that will keep the “pig trough” full. When the whiners and takers demand more, the corrupt politicians, eager to placate and pander to the rioters and complainers, scream that the rich aren’t paying their fair share and in so doing they are direct contributors to dividing America, with malice aforethought, in a totally unnecessary war of the haves and the have-nots.

“Fair Share!” Let’s talk about fair share! Ten percent (10%) of the top income earners in America pay 70% of the income taxes. That’s not just fair; it is way more than fair, to the point of outright theft. Forty-seven percent (47%) of the population pay no income taxes at all and that 47% receives money FROM the government for just being poor, paid by those that pay 70% of the taxes. This unconstitutional redistribution of wealth is class warfare run amok! In a free society, it is inexcusable. If this author had the fortune of being in the top 10% of income earners, you can bet we would do everything in our power to shield our income from the rapacious government and the bloodsuckers. By what right, or by what common-sense law, or by what constitutional principle, does the poor obtain a benefit from the rich by the mere fact of being poor? You won’t find that in the Constitution, ladies and gentlemen.

As Obama dodges along the campaign trail towards re-election and lies come out of his mouth like a saliva-driven Niagara Falls, he uses class warfare to further divide the country between ethnic and white, naive and intelligent, socialist and patriot, unwise and wise and the rich and the poor. He is the consummate politician who will say anything to get elected. He will tell any lie, use any meaningless example, dupe any group, or exploit any opportunity or emergency, to fulfill his goal of four more years. Millions of Americans saw through this snake-oil salesman-style charlatan well before he was ever elected president and couldn’t believe that the electorate was so mesmerized by someone who was so shallow, without substance and a severely tainted past.

But all of Obama’s lying and propaganda wouldn’t work if government hadn’t been so successful in dividing us, such that we are so dumbed-down now that we fight with each other instead of taking our anger and actions out on those who manipulate us, pull our strings and given the chance, would enslave us. We have spawned more than one generation that no longer values freedom, self-reliance and independence; they only value what they can get for free. They no longer value the therapeutic and monetary rewards of hard work. They have willingly sacrificed their freedom for welfare payments, guaranteed jobs, a so-called “living wage” and the false umbrella of security, as defined and provided by government. At least half of these last few generations of Americans find no value in personal pride or doing the best job they can because they haven’t been taught that doing a good job reflects well upon them and gives them credibility and honor. Instead, they are obsessed with electronic and other toys, communication devices and mindless, guttural TV shows, or movies with no redeeming value or substance. They are also obsessed by “unfairness,” spoon- fed to them by a government that exploits everything they can out of the looters, moochers and freeloaders for their vote. What is even worse, these folks who hate America and would take her down if they could are spawning more generations of dependent Americans with the same Gimee! mindset.

But bear in mind, none of this has happened by accident, because throughout history government has learned that the best and easiest way to govern is to keep the masses happy, brainwashed, distracted ….. and divided. But what faces America today could also not have happened if the people were honorable, honest, trustworthy, self-reliant and vigilant against government’s shadowy and covert expansion of its constitutionally-authorized powers.

It is quite possible from the foregoing that you think that we are heartless and without compassion. Nothing could be further from the truth. On the contrary, we believe there is a limited role for government to play in helping those who can’t help themselves by providing incentives and enhancing the role that private charities play in providing this assistance. When a person gives to a private charity as a voluntary charitable act, that is an act of free choice. There are millions of Americans who give regularly to charities every year. There are millions more who give to their churches which also provide assistance for the poor. In fact, America is the most generous nation on earth.

However, when government says you MUST pay higher taxes so that government can transfer those taxes to the poor and the undeserving, that is an involuntary act of charity through force of law and takes away the right of free choice. But what so many forget is that without free choice, there can be no freedom, and free choice is the first casualty of a tyrannical government.

Here is what Benjamin Franklin said about the poor:

“I am for doing good to the poor, but … I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. I observed … that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer.”

When the government gets in the act of providing for the poor, especially when their motive is to buy votes, the poor grow in number and the cost to continue their support grows as well. The cost for government to support the poor in America since President Johnson’s Great Society, (click on “Great Society” link for more information about the poor from The Heritage Foundation) has been in the trillions of dollars and yet we have neither “….. led or have driven the poor out of poverty,” in the words of Benjamin Franklin. We have only succeeded in growing poverty and growing exponentially the cost to support it. As a result, we are weaker as a people and weaker as a nation.

Of course, being poor is no picnic and not all poor people are looters, moochers or freeloaders. But in America, anyone who will get an education, work hard to the best of his physical and mental ability, stay on the right side of the law and be personally responsible for his actions can rise above being poor. The history books are full of individuals who have risen out of poverty to become household names. But the poor will never rise out of poverty if they continue to surround themselves with other people who care so little about them. The poor will never beat the odds if they settle for a life of dependency on government and pick role models who are the dredges of society.

The reality is, the poor in America live far better off than the poor anywhere on the planet, with subsidized housing, food credit cards, plasma TVs, free health care, free education, free school breakfasts and lunches and free cell phones, all paid for on the backs of the American taxpayer and administered by a grossly inefficient and hopelessly corrupt government. The reason that they live so well is that they are just the pawns of government who pay them off to buy their votes. This is why the Democrats have been so successful at maintaining political power in America for the last 70 years. They pander to the poor, the undeserving and ethnic minorities with your tax money for their votes.

Through ever-expanding entitlement programs, government has been instrumental in spawning generation after generation of people whose only choice for living is being dependent on the great mother, government. Having done so, the government has brought us to the brink of national bankruptcy and has created a large segment of the population that is weak, wholly dependent upon government and votes for those politicians that promise and deliver their continuing subsistence, in a classic example of a self-fulfilling prophecy.

A letter to the editor in the Waco Tribune Herald back in November of 2010 by one Alfred W. Evans of Gatesville, TX sums up pretty well what millions of Americans think about the welfare state. Chances are, you agree with Mr. Evans:

(link for publisher https://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/tag/waco-tribune-herald/)

“The Parallax Prophecy” predicts that the law of diminishing returns will eventually bring this scheme for buying votes through government handouts crashing down (as it has in Greece and soon the rest of Europe), and those now dependent on government for their lives and livelihoods will either have to become self-reliant and independent, find the skirts of another “mother” to hang on to, or suffer or die needlessly.

Ladies and gentlemen, the history books tell us that it took just 3% of the colonials to give birth to freedom some 235 years ago by making the greatest sacrifice that anyone can give: the sacrifice of life. Can 3% of Americans restore freedom again this time peacefully, or are there 3% of Americans who even care about freedom anymore? The presidential election in November of 2012 will give us a clue as to which way the wind is blowing. If the wind is blowing in the right direction, perhaps then we can “spawn” another generation of greater Americans who believe in freedom so much that they will give whatever sacrifice is necessary to preserve, protect and defend that freedom for their children and grandchildren ….. so help them God, in spite of the freeloaders who circle the seats of power to beg, borrow, or steal their “fair” share and the political criminals that will hand their “fair” share to them by force of law.

“We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force.” — Ayn Rand

——————————–

Ron Ewart, President

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RURAL LANDOWNERS

P. O. Box 1031, Issaquah, WA 98027

425 837-5365 or 1 800 682-7848R

http://www.narlo.org,

http://www.narloltd.com

2012-02-07T06:16:00.000-08:00

Corruption in America is Killing Her…and Us

ARE WE SEEING “THE LAST VESTIGES OF LIBERTY”

by Anonymous

(Feb. 6, 2012) — One can only suffer so much degradation at the hands of evildoers, that, backed into the proverbial corner, they lash back. I am now at that point. The evil my family has been dealing with through the corrupt court system, the watching of a beloved, yet helpless family member literally be snuffed from existence by the very guardians of her person for money, fighting on as every attempt to do the right thing the right way is thrown back at you with so much corruption and dishonesty, that you finally feel that perhaps the “right way” can no longer be the best way……….that is the crossroad at which I now stand.

Evil in America has been insidiously attacking every moral fiber of our society for a VERY long time. The perpetrators finally reached their pinnacle with the 2008 election. Everything they had crawled through the gutter to achieve was now within their grasp, and the roaches finally crawled from the woodwork to claim their prize, namely, the complete overthrow of America. They no longer have to hide. Their work is completed. Agenda 21, the UN Small Arms Treaty, the appointment of Muslim judges to major courts by the likes of would-be “conservative” heroes like Chris Christie. Oh, sure, there are still gems to be added to their crowning glory, but that is fast being carried out by all who now corrupt the halls of government.

The ABC agencies have spread their evil into the deepest strongholds, permeated our guarded secrets and turned them against America’s citizens. Criminals cross our borders with reckless abandon, and Christian followers are labeled “enemies and traitors.” Tax cheats hold our highest offices, and little people are forced from their jobs, their homes, from all that gives them dignity.

Is there actually anyone out there willing to tell me this can be reversed with a single corrupt election? The machines are rigged, the ability to stop foreign influence was destroyed when BO was allowed to accept funding from across the globe, much of it coming from our mortal enemies. Our allies, on the other hand, have suffered similar insults and assaults as those heaped upon this nation’s members. I stand by my email from the other night. The time has come. To shut one’s eyes after the Malihi fiasco is to just prolong the inevitable. Mexico has been allowed to sue a sovereign American State standing partner with our very own “government.” Our national sovereignty is slowly but surely being handed over to foreign entities……Libya, anyone?

From the get-go, those in D.C. KNEW the evil of BO and company. His work for Raila’s election after Raila signed an agreement with the Muslim Brotherhood. The turning off of EVERY security step on his machines so as to accept funds from many in the Middle East trying to “buy” the American Presidency. The refusal on the part of “his” AG to prosecute the New Black Panthers. Do I need to go on? You are the choir………those of us here already know all the sordid details. We have all watched, and prayed, as “R’s” tried to convince us they were NOT part of the evil……..RIIIIIIGHT, thank you, Crybaby Boehner.

What I think I find most disheartening is so many of those I consider “My Patriots” trying to decide which of the remaining “four” is the lesser evil. They are ALL “EVIL.” I have prayed that the work on the net by Patriots would spur IMMENSE support for Patriots like John Dummett, Tim Cox with goooh, and a handful of others who have tried to break the chains of “party hack” status and take back America as that which our Founding Fathers so desired, “citizen legislators.” Too many here just will NOT believe that we could once again have such a mighty show of force for someone not huddled under the mantle of a “D” or an “R.”

“If you run an outsider, BO is back in,” is the response. Are there REALLY that many who disbelieve after all we have done here in the last four years? “YES!” Mitt, Newt, Rick or Ron are none of them going to save America. IMHO, anyone who has worked here low these many months and does not understand that is doomed to watch musloids remove the last vestiges of Liberty from us. BO will once again pay for our Presidency with Middle Eastern money. Whoever wins the “R” backing will only be afforded his “turn” to run. I believe that person has already been chosen by the “R” elites, and it will be Mitt. But that matters little, because based on Malihi, BO WILL serve a second term…….for LIFE!

It is time for watering the Tree of Liberty. The price of that Liberty is eternal vigilance, and we let our guard down. Now the only way, I believe, to set things straight, is to start where our Founders started, and once again BEG GOD to give us the strength and courage to risk our lives, our fortunes, and our Sacred Honor. It’s a mighty price, but it sure beats the alternative.

2012-01-25T09:04:00.000-08:00

Transformation and Infiltration of America: The United States of Frankenstein

OBAMA’S PLAN FOR AMERICA

by Dr. Laurie Roth, Presidential Candidate

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Have Americans allowed a Frankenstein to be created?

(Jan. 24, 2012) — Obama has told us for years what his ‘change’ plan would be if elected. He plans to bring America down in size and turn her into a broken-up Barbie Doll…..maybe Ken. Maybe we will become a hybrid Barbie/Ken combo that is confused.

Obama has never been a mystery to anyone, including our lame-brain media and political leaders who look the other way as more of our Constitutional skin gets ripped off. Various sources offer several estimates as to how many Czars Obama has appointed. Some say that now it is up to 45 Czars, who completely bypass Congress.

When I even start to look at the Czars’ profiles, I am stunned into silence, then start screaming in unbelief! All are radical leftists. Listing the horror show of the Czars is a whole other article. The selection of Czars, however, tells us everything about Obama. He is anti-Semitic, anti-capitalist, anti-American, anti-freedom, anti-US achievement, pro-abortion, anti-sovereignty, anti-Constitution, anti-border security and anti-God. That pretty much covers it.

One of my show listeners recently reminded me of a “Meet The Press” interview back on Sunday, Sept, 7th, 2008. Just a few highlights tell you exactly who Obama is and what he planned to do way back.

Highlights of Meet the Press Interview Sunday, Sept. 7th, 2008 with Obama

Remember when Obama wouldn’t follow protocol when our National Anthem was played? General Bill Ginn, USAF (ret) reminded then- Senator Obama of our longstanding protocol and U.S. Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec.171… about standing at attention,with the right hand over the heart, facing the flag when hearing the national anthem. Obama was also asked about why he wouldn’t wear a flag pin. Obama stated:

“As I’ve said about the flag pin, I don’t want to be perceived as taking sides…..” “There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression…” “The anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air, and all that sort of thing.”

Then, Obama blew my mind with his next quote.

“The National Anthem should be ‘swapped’ for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song ‘I’d Like To Teach the World To Sing.’ If that were our anthem, then I might salute it. In my opinion, we should consider reinventing our National Anthem as well as ‘redesign’ our Flag to better offer our enemies hope and love. It’s my intention, if elected, to disarm America to the level of acceptance to our Middle East Brethren. If we, as a Nation of warring people, conduct ourselves like the nations of Islam, where peace prevails —perhaps a state or period of mutual accord could exist between our governments…..”

There is more. Read the last bit he proudly said in the famous “Meet The Press” interview:

“When I become President, I will seek a pact of agreement to end hostilities between those who have been at war or in a state of enmity, and a freedom from disquieting oppressive thoughts. We as a Nation, have placed upon the nations of Islam, an unfair injustice, which is WHY my wife disrespects the Flag, and she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the past.”

“Of course now, I have found myself about to become the President of the United States and I have put my hatred aside. I will use my power to bring CHANGE to this Nation, and offer the people a new path. May wife and I look forward to becoming our Country’s First black Family. Indeed, CHANGE is about to overwhelm the United States of America.”

How is the transformation working for you?

Per Obama’s hero, Saul Alinsky, he has been hitting America as fast as he can from all sides with the goal to dismember our freedoms, image and power.

Widgets of Obama destruction from day one:

Moral betrayal – Undoing the Mexico City policy so we would now pay for abortions around the world. I guess we hadn’t murdered enough babies in America. While Obama set up the murder of millions more babies he was boldly declaring to the Turkish Parliament that we were no longer a Christian nation.

Health betrayal – Obama hasturned the best health care system from ‘safe and effective’ care to ‘cost-effective’ care with forced ‘end of life counseling for our seniors,’ ‘paid abortions,’ ‘care for illegal aliens,’ ‘not so hidden taxes everywhere,’‘threats and fines if we don’t have Government approved health insurance,’ andon and on. At least 27 states have stood against this along with two Federal Judges….now we await the Supreme Court’s ruling.

NDAA betrayal – Obama couldn’t be more thrilled about the NDAA bill that he signed into law. Now he can violate Posse Comitatus, our Miranda rights,grab up any US citizen under vague terrorist accusations, hold us indefinitely without charges and without trial. John McCain and Carl Levin authored this fascist tool for our demise and so did ALL who voted for it. It is a total betrayal to our Constitution and America. All who signed this should be impeached, including Obama!

Stunningly, in a recent debate,GOP hopeful Mitt Romney said he supported the NDAA bill. So,not only is Romney for gay marriage, really pro-choice,created the inspirational health care bill that inspired Obamacare, but he is also a fascist and plans to be a dictator as Obama is and proudly crush our rights. Commentator Sher Zieve was the first to refer to Obama as ‘Dictator-in-Chief.’ Now, this term is taking hold everywhere. Gee, are a few people waking up? Sickeningly, both Obama and Romney said they wouldn’t turn on Americans because of their ‘character’ and ‘goodness.’ Doesn’t that make you feel special and safe?

Right on the heels of the NDAA Bill, we saw the Activation of FEMA camps while politicians and major media looked the other way. I’m wondering if they will continue to be mute if someday they end up in one?

Other tools of destruction – Infiltration

Obama now has the dictatorial authority he needs to apprehend any American at any time and whisk us off to ‘God knows where’forever. He has FEMA camps ready to imprison anyone he wants.

Obama has the military as his weapon, though it is unclear if all will obey his command and turn on their ownjust because he is the ‘Commander in Chief.’ Time will tell.

Obama also has the TSA as his weapon, hiding behind security and protection. We see groping, random searches, nudie machines, now an altercation with Senator Rand Paul because he didn’t want to be groped. Naturally Obama has stood with the over-the-edge and grossly inappropriate TSA instead of the Senator.

Bring in the Muslims

While folks are distracted and busy with their lives, Obama is flooding our country with imported Muslims. Debbie Schlussel exposed Obama’s absurd announcement at Disney World that he planned to make it way easier for foreigners to come to America. She states that Obama has quadrupled the amount of Saudi Muslims coming in, from 25,000 in 2010 to 110,000 in 2011. 93% are being approved.

A few years back after Obama already gave $900 million to the radical Muslim group Hamas, he brought many of them to live in the US as well. Why?

Now, we see many members of the radical Muslim group, Muslim Brotherhood, working in high level positions for Obama. We have been completely infiltrated by radical Islam…..wait, but there is more.

Obama supports radical, separatist Hispanic groups

Obama gave a high profile speech of support to LaRaza (NCLR). This is a radical, racist and separatist group that demands amnesty,our southwestern states to be returned to Mexico and states their race is first. Obama has tripled the taxpayer funds given to NCLR. In fact, Cecilia Munoz,a member of this radical group, is the Director of Intergovernmental Affairs.

This week I interviewed Al Garza, a Mexican-American patriot and former executive director of the Minute Men. I’m honored to say he endorses my candidacy. We talked about the real intention of Hispanic radical groups such as LaRaza, Aztlan, Mecha and others. He said these groups aren’t interested at all in becoming American, supporting our Constitution and law, but rather, demand Amnesty and want our southern states to go back to Mexico.

This push to radical, separatist Hispanic groups and radical Islamic groups is nothing but Obama implanting dangerous and anti-American foreigners throughout our country. He is doing this to manipulate a larger voting bloc and implant radical, leftist-thinking that reflects his anti-American and Islamic heart.

What to do:

Understand the scale of our challenge and problem. We have a dictator in the White House and could get another one if we aren’t careful. Don’t break the law, but stand and march in the streets for freedom. Write your Congress person and Senator and demand the repeal of NDAA and the Health Care bill for starters.

Vote only for those who REALLY support and love the United States, our Judeo-Christian values and our Constitution.

Join me each day on my show at: www.therothshow.com Find out more at www.laurieroth2012.com

2012-01-23T17:18:00.001-08:00

Which Laws Could Have Been Broken?

MISUSE OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY, CONSPIRACY, MISPRISION OF FELONY?

by Sharon Rondeau

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Can the U.S. Department of Justice fail to prosecute federal law-breakers?

(Jan. 23, 2012) — Numerous graphics, typesetting, Adobe® and scanning professionals have claimed that the long-form birth certificate image bearing the alleged details of Barack Hussein Obama II’s birth presented to the public on April 27, 2012 is a forgery. If that is the case, which federal statutes have been violated, if any, by placing the image on federal government property?How many people might have participated in the crime, and what might the penalties be?

If the Hawaii Department of Health has been obfuscating the fact that they have no birth certificate bearing Obama’s name, or that what they have is falsified, of which crime(s) are they guilty?

If people within the Democrat National Committee or Democrat Party knew that identity theft had been committed and a “synthetic identity” presented to the American people as a ruse to win a presidential election, are they guilty of conspiracy?

If Obama ran for president under a false identity with a fabricated life story, was he ever really the President?

If misuse of government property, including computer servers, personnel, and occupation of the White House under false pretenses has occurred, what might the consequences be?

U.S. Code provides for penalties for members of the three branches of federal government who:

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or

(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as
defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.

Would that include the Congressional Research Service?

18 USC 371 states:

Sec. 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.

If a person is aware that a crime has been committed and fails to report it to the authorities, he or she could be found guilty of Misprision of Felony and spend up to three years in jail:

Sec. 4. Misprision of felony

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

On Friday, January 20, 2012, Judge Michael Malihi denied Obama attorney Michael Jablonski’s Motion to Quash several subpoenas issued by Atty. Orly Taitz requesting original or certified documentation of his social security number application, birth record, and any aliases he might have used during his life. The judge stated that a legitimate reason might exist as to why Obama cannot attend, but that his counsel failed to supply it.

The administrative court hearing in Atlanta, GA is scheduled to hear three ballot challenges filed under OCGA 21-2-5, which allows a registered voter to challenge the qualifications of any candidate for state or federal office. Obama is being asked to prove his constitutional eligibility and placement on the presidential ballot for November.

The mainstream press has been interviewing Atty. Taitz about the upcoming hearing. Taitz has stated that federal officials, including judges, have participated in a “cover up.”

Lynn Sweet of The Chicago Sun-Times is reporting that Obama does not plan to attend, but instead will be holding “events” in the Western part of the country. The report does not say “campaign events.” The official White House presidential calendar shows an empty schedule for Obama from January 22 and forward but features the planned State of the Union address for January 24. The Vice President’s calendar is empty. UPI shows the January 23, 2012 presidential schedule as a meeting with the vice president and hosting of the Boston Bruins.

Update, 9:48 a.m ET: The White House presidential schedule now reflects the UPI posting noted above, but no schedule is posted for the remainder of this week. Obama’s previous weeks in office have shown full daily and weekly schedules.

Is Obama doing his job this week? How busy is he? Why is the White House showing no schedule for either Obama or Biden? Is Obama really running for re-election, or just going through the motions?

Rather than attend the hearing in Georgia, could Obama simply supply the information requested in the subpoenas issued by Taitz? In his book, he said he found his “birth certificate” with his vaccination forms and other personal papers. If that is the case, what does the state of Hawaii have on file, and why do they refuse to reveal it?

Was Obama’s letter to Hawaii Health Department Director Loretta Fuddy a ruse?

Should Obama fail to attend the hearing or provide the requested documents to the Georgia court, is he guilty of contempt of court?

18 USC, Sect. 401 states:

Sec. 401. Power of court

A court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or imprisonment, or both, at its discretion, such contempt of its authority, and none other, as—
(1) Misbehavior of any person in its presence or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice;
(2) Misbehavior of any of its officers in their official transactions;
(3) Disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command.

For an event of potentially great magnitude, why would anyone encourage American citizens concerned about a candidate’s eligibility to stay home? Could the judge have Obama jailed if he does not comply with the subpoena?

Did anyone in the Obama regime learn of crimes after they were committed and fail to report them? 18 USC, Section 3 states:

Sec. 3. Accessory after the fact

Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.

United States Code addressing blackmail reads:

Sec. 873. Blackmail

Whoever, under a threat of informing, or as a consideration for not informing, against any violation of any law of the United States, demands or receives any money or other valuable thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Has anyone within the Obama regime committed or been a victim of blackmail?

If Obama has committed treason against the United States, what should the penalty be?

2012-01-22T19:27:00.000-08:00

Is Obama Guilty of Identity Fraud Rather than Ineligibility?

DO MISSING RECORDS, HAWAII’S STONEWALLING AND INCONSISTENCIES POINT TO A DIFFERENT LIFE STORY?

by Sharon Rondeau

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Did Obama achieve the presidency under false pretenses?

(Jan. 22, 2012) — On January 26, 2012, an administrative hearing will be held at 9:00 a.m. in Atlanta, GA, regarding the constitutional eligibility of one “Barack Hussein Obama” and whether or not his name should be placed on that state’s ballot for the 2012 presidential election.

But is identity fraud, rather than ineligibility, the actual crime?

Recently Atty. Orly Taitz, one of three attorneys bringing ballot challenges on the 26th, has been informed in an email that the courtroom has been changed in order to provide “better multimedia equipment for your convenience.” The mainstream media has begun to cover the upcoming hearing challenging Obama’s eligibility, and a citizen video urges concerned citizens to attend.

What will be the consequences if Obama does not appear? Atty. Mario Apuzzo responded to the question:

…The subpoena issued to Obama comes from an administrative court rather than a law court. A court-issued subpoena has the authority of a court order whether it comes from a law court or an administrative one.

Obama just happens to be the President now and would have to take time out of his official schedule to honor the subpoena. Nevertheless, Obama is subpoened as a private individual, not as the President.

Does Obama have to honor the subpoena? The only way to get out of honoring a subpoena is to have it quashed on a motion to quash. Obama tried that and it has so far failed. He can attempt to file a motion for reconsideration. But until the court changes its mind, he must honor the subpoena and here is why.

“It is beyond dispute that there is in fact, a public obligation to provide evidence, see United States v. Bryan, 339 U. S. 323, 339 U. S. 331; Blackmer v. United States, 284 U. S. 421, 284 U. S. 438, and that this obligation persists no matter how financially burdensome it may be. Footnote 10″

“Footnote 10 [I]t may be a sacrifice of time and labor, and thus of ease, of profits, of livelihood. This contribution is not to be regarded as a gratuity, or a courtesy, or an ill-required favor. It is a duty not to be grudged or evaded. Whoever is impelled to evade or to resent it should retire from the society of organized and civilized communities, and become a hermit. He who will live by society must let society live by him, when it requires to. 8 J. Wigmore, Evidence § 2192, p. 72 (J. McNaughton rev.1961).”

Hurtado v. United States, 410 U.S. 578, 589 (1973). This is one case among the many on this issue.

Indeed, Obama, as a member of legally constitutued society, as a “public obligation” to provide evidence to a court, whether that court is a law court or an administrative one. His obligation is even greater given that the subpoena touches upon his right to eventually hold a public office should he win the election. Even Congress, which is not a law court, issues subpoenas which must be obeyed at the risk of suffering severe sanctions, including incarceration.

The only way that Obama could avoid the subpoena is to show that he has some privilege that protects him from giving the requested evidence. Again, Obama has been subpoened as a private person, a candidate for public office, not as the President of the United States. From the Georgia court’s ruling on Obama’s motion to quash, we can see that Obama failed to make such a showing that convinced the court that he in fact has such a privilege.

If Obama does not honor the subpoena, the court, applying Georgia law and precedents from federal law, can issue an order to show cause to him ordering him to show cause why he should not be held in contempt. If he still does not comply, then he would be held in contempt of court. The court in such a case will issue sanctions to him, which can include a monetary penalty, an adverse ruling against him in the case itself, or even incarceration. Since he is the currently putative sitting President, the court would probably just opt for an adverse ruling rather than jail. That would be the best option since it gets to the heart of the matter. That adverse ruling would be that Obama has not met his burden of proof to show that he is an Article II “natural born Citizen.” Hence, the court could recommend to the Georgia Secretary of State that Obama’s not be allowed to be placed on the primary ballot. In the end, the Secretary of State will make the ultimate decision.

Additionally, the current sitting President of the United States not honoring a court-issued and properly served subpoena related to whether the President is constitutionally eligible for that very office could also be deemed a “high Crime[] or Misdemeanor[]” under Article II, Section 4, the article dealing with impeachment of the President. Congress could declare such conduct a high crime or misdemeanor and inititate and prosecute impeachment proceedings against Obama and they should.

For more than three years, Obama has declined to release any information about his medical history, school records and Harvard Law School compositions. One newspaper stated that Obama’s alleged attendance at Columbia University in New York City is “a mystery.” Why can Columbia produce nothing on the time he allegedly spent there? Why would they not wish to do so?

The state of Hawaii has refused to produce the original birth certificate allegedly on file with their Health Department, even after receiving a subpoena from the U.S. District Court in Honolulu and a second subpoena from the Georgia administrative court which will hold the hearing on the 26th.

On April 27, 2011, the White House released what it claimed was a certified copy of the original long-form birth certificate held by the Hawaii Department of Health. Almost immediately, bloggers and document analysts declared it a forgery.

Exactly one year before, The Washington Post placed a photo of Malcolm X with the caption “Obama touts wind energy in Iowa.” Did the editor not catch that error before publication?

The short-form Certification of Live Birth released in June 2008 following public pressure has also been labeled a forgery.

If true, why would Obama have presented forged documents to the public? Recent research claims that “Barack Obama II” is a synthetic identity.

On November 30, 2007, Obama signed a notarized statement for the state of Arizona asserting that he was constitutionally eligible for the office of the President, the requirements for which are:

1. being a “natural born Citizen”

2. having resided 14 years within the country, and

3. being 35 years of age or older.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, AZ, has launched an investigation into Obama’s eligibility and stated that a report will be issued next month containing information that could be a “shock.”

Is it possible that Obama was born in the United States to two U.S.-citizen parents but that his identity was changed at some point? If so, why?

At least two researchers have stated that Obama is the son of Malcolm X, a civil rights leader who converted to Islam while in prison and was assassinated on February 22, 1965 in Harlem. Israel Insider has also presented the possibility based on Martha Trowbridge’s post dated November 2, 2011.

Malcolm X had frequented The Apollo Theater located in Harlem, where on January 19, despite his busy schedule, Obama appeared and sang part of a song with a reference to the “Reverend Al Green.” Obama’s Georgia attorney, in his Motion to Quash Taitz’s subpoena for Obama to appear with the reqested proof of eligibility, claimed that it was “unreasonable” for Obama to attend because of his presidential “duties,” but he had time to embrace a woman inappropriately during a “campaign stop” in Florida last week while the mainstream media attempted to mitigate the story revealed by the photo.

There have been many inconsistencies in the life story provided to the public about Obama, including the life of his purported mother. It has been reported that Bill Ayers is the author of Obama’s book, Dreams From My Father. If Barack Obama Sr. is not Obama’s father, did Ayers write a work of fiction to convince a gullible American public of something which never occurred?

Are the photos of Obama’s purported relatives “photoshopped?” Was a history created for him, including using the birth certificate number of a child who lived for only one day, born on August 4, 1961? Was that number conveniently assigned to Obama to help create a new identity for him in the belief that no one would ever ask for tiny Virginia‘s original birth record? Is that why Obama claims he was born on August 4 when it is alleged that his real birthday is October 28, 1959?

Is it possible that information released by the State Department in regard to the travel records of Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Sr. is forged? Were the delays caused by the State Department in releasing the documents intentional to keep people focused on Stanley Ann and Obama Sr. when they were not his parents after all?

On January 16, 2012, in recognition of the holiday ascribed to the birthday of the late Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Obama painted on a wall the words, “The time is always right to do what is right.”

Malcolm X was noted for his persuasive public speaking ability and his leadership qualities. Obama enjoyed a meteoric rise beginning with his speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.

Malcolm had decried America as being racist, and during the 2008 campaign, both Obama and the media invoked racism.

On January 21, 2012, it was reported that a “former Obama staffer” was arrested “in a scheme to impersonate Iowa Secretary of State Matt Schultz.” Bill Ayers reportedly committed identity fraud while on the run from the authorities in the 1970s.

Researcher Martha Trowbridge believes that radical political activist Fred Newman, Ph.D. is Barack Obama’s “Uncle Fred.”

Do Bill Ayers and Fred Newman have anything in common?

Has “Obama” impersonated someone or used a stolen identity? Is that why he is using a social security number from the state of Connecticut, where he never lived or worked?

Why was the criminal record of Bari M. Shabazz altered after his alleged death, which was never proven? Malcolm X changed his name to “El-Hajj Malik al-Shabazz.” His wife and daughters used the same surname.

Did Obama achieve the presidency in 2008 “by any means necessary?” If so, is the crime of identity fraud worse than being constitutionally ineligible?

Who knows the truth, and for how long have they known it?

Lost the Bill of Rights?

2012-01-13T20:15:00.000-08:00

If this bill is allowed to stand as passed, we have lost the Bill of Rights and everything that goes with it. The bill was written so it could be construed for total marital law with no defense or ability to contact anyone to let them know you have been arrested. It also gives confiscatory rights to the government so we no longer have the right to own anything if the government decide to take what we have struggled to pay for, including food for more than 7 days. This has to be stopped.

We have a dictator in the White House and have lost a tremendous amount of rights since he has taken office. He has castrated both the legislative and judicial branches of government, is ruling as a total dictator and brags about it by saying he "won't be stopped and will do what it takes to do what he wants to do." There is a major problem with this kind of action. That is why our forefathers wrote the Constitution and Bill of Rights in the first place, was to prevent exactly what he is doing. I am truly afraid there will be people who will see an armed uprising as the only way to fix what Obama has done. I too have major objections to his way of ruling that is in direct conflict with the Constitution that he swore to protect and uphold, with his hand on the Koran, and is setting the track to making this a country that Pol Pot would have loved.

PLEASE take action on this. This country is taking its dying breaths and we have to stop this kind of take over that is trashing all of our rights. Making our elected officials in Washington aware how unhappy we are and taking action by fax, email and in the ballot box HAS TO TAKE PLACE. We need ALL of our Constitution and Bill of Rights restored - not just part of them. The power grab of taking part of our right began during WWI but Obama has just about destroyed it all by himself with his illegal end runs around Congress to do what he wants and refusal to enforce the laws of this country. There is no question in my mind that he is determined to destroy this country and he has done a bang up job so far. We are definitely on a greased slide to becoming a 3rd world country with a banana republic form of government that takes this country down totally and so many more countries as well that have their currency tied to the American dollar. This alone means he will take down at least 15-30 more countries, which are 2nd world countries, when the USA dollar collapses, which it will, most likely within the next 1-2 years. I fully expect travel restrictions with 1-2 years as well and if we have an election this year it will be the last. I sure hope I am way off but I don't think I am with all of the signs coming out of Washington that have come out in just the last 3 months.

A Special Message from New Americans United for Freedom Contributor KrisAnne Hall

Urgent Alert: Armed DHS officers have skeptics rapidly reassessing; even Rush Limbaugh now agrees – NDAA, the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 is "Total Authoritarianism." America is awakening to Congress's monumental mistake and Obama's treachery.

auf_dhscheckpointThis week, Conservative icon Rush Limbaugh finally openly stated what we have been saying all along, that NDAA 2012 really does allow the President "to detain anybody, for no reason and they don't even have to charge you." Limbaugh discussed in a radio broadcast this week some of the facts and arguments we have presented at length to alert concerned citizens of the threat NDAA poses to Liberty.

For the love of God and Country, I implore you – fax Congress today and absolutely, unequivocally DEMAND CONGRESS RESTORE OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

Without the protections provided by Habeas Corpus and the Posse Comitatus Act, America is no better than a banana republic awaiting a despot to round up dissenters and lock us away.

It appears the Obama Administration is wasting no time. Just days ago, DHS officers appeared at a Florida Social Security office armed with semi-automatic rifles and K-9 dogs. While the agency claims the action was simply a "preparedness exercise," DHS officers nonetheless demanded identification papers from the law-abiding citizens waiting in line.

AMERICA, WHAT HAVE WE BECOME???!!!

HERE ARE THE FACTS: CONGRESS CELEBRATES THE 220TH
ANNIVERSARY OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS – BY ENDING THEM

By KrisAnne Hall
www.AmericansUnitedforFreedom.com
December 16, 2011

auf_cryinglibertyToday, on the 220th anniversary of the Bill of Rights, Congress overwhelmingly voted to effectively extinguish those rights. They relinquished their claim to lawful authority by violating Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution and granting license to the Executive Branch to become the very tyrannical dictatorship our Founding Fathers fought and died to escape. Congress' betrayal has now set America firmly upon the path of pathetic banana republics and fearsome totalitarian states, with the knock on the door in the dead of night, the disappearances – where political dissidents can be suppressed, silenced or left to rot in unknown prisons. Today, I grieve for my country.

This gaping wound to our liberty MUST not stand. My earlier, straightforward analyses of Sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) make it clear why.

Congressmen Claimed The Bill Specifically Limited Actions Of The US Government To Al-Qaeda And Taliban Terrorists Involved In 9/11 Aggression

False. This refers to: Sec. 1031(b) Covered Persons: (1) A person who planned, authorized, committed , or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored those responsible for those attacks. (2) A person who was part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition forces…

Which continues:

…including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.

Congressmen Claimed Section 1032 Does Not Cover US Citizens.

False. Section 1032(2) states that the requirement to detain an individual applies to someone who has been determined to be "a member of, al-Qaeda or an associated force that acts in coordination with or pursuant to the direction of al-Qaeda: and to have participated in the course of planning or carrying out an attack or attempted attack against the United States or its coalition partners."

Which continues, section (4) "The Secretary of Defense (Leon Panetta) may, in consultation with the Secretary of State (Hillary Clinton) and the Director of National Intelligence (James R. Clapper), waive the requirements of paragraph (1) if the Secretary submits to Congress a certification in writing that such a waiver is in the national security interests of the United States."
auf_handcufffenceCongressmen Claimed Section 1032(b)(1) Specifically Excludes US Citizens

False. Section 1032(b)(1) states, "The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States." What this section says is the REQUIREMENT to detain doesn't extend to US Citizens, but the OPTION does. That means they don't have to detain them, but can if they want to!

Congressional and Obama Administration supporters of this bill do not WANT to protect the rights and civil liberty of US Citizens.

I even did some follow up on just days ago regarding the misinformation on the Feinstein Amendment. And here, on the 220th Anniversary of the Bill of Rights, I can't help but wonder what has happened to truth?

I would like to know how Congress can justify just one hour of debate over revoking something that is so fundamental and so important as our right to habeas corpus, and presume to enact something so controversial, and so questionable into law as this travesty. I truly enjoyed Congressman Jerrold Nadler's argument on the floor. He pointed out that many Constitutional jurists and military experts are vehemently opposed to this bill, positing the very destruction of our rights we are trying to protect from terrorist attack. He also did an amazing thing; he shut down the argument that Congress needed to pass this bill with these sections so the military would get urgently funded. He explained that they had plenty of time to fail the bill, take out these malignant provisions, bring the bill back and pass it before the end of the week. What would be so hard about that? Why couldn't they do just what Rep. Nadler proposed? Because too many did not want to.

As I watched these debates and listened to the arguments over the last few days, I became very perplexed at how those who deny the specified language of this bill can do so with such conviction. There is breathtaking dishonesty associated with what they are saying. Time and time again I have heard that this bill specifically excludes US Citizens. NO, IT DOES NOT. You have to be illiterate or purposefully disingenuous to put forth such an argument. The relevant section specifically says: "The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States." Legally speaking, stating that an agency is "not required" to do something is the very same as saying they have the choice of doing so or not. If the drafters of this legislation truly wanted to exclude US Citizens from having their Constitutional rights stripped, the lawyers should have, and would have, used the type of language found in 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(e)(2), the section that contains religious exemptions for employment practices or the various religious and medical exemptions that exist from state to state for things like vaccinations. They are experienced legislators; they know that!

Furthermore, section 1032(4) specifically provides a military waiver anytime national security dictates a need! "The Secretary of Defense may, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, waive the requirements of paragraph (1) if the Secretary submits to Congress a certification in writing that such a waiver is in the national security interests of the United States." There you have it. All limitations fly out the window if the government determines a "national security interest."

auf_shreddingconstitutionThis morning I found a jewel, and a light bulb came on in my mind. I was in the middle of a twitter argument over this bill and this person was absolutely adamant that the language of the bill stated that military detention was "inapplicable to US Citizens or US lawful resident aliens." I finally asked my new twitter friend to send me a link to the bill because I could not find that language. What I got was a link to the Bill Summary and Status, the CRS Summary. I could not believe what I was seeing. The summary put out by Congress describing this bill was a blatant misrepresentation of the bill itself. The CRS Summary stated that section 1032 had specific language that said the detention provisions were "inapplicable to US Citizens." That not only is not an accurate summary, it is a bold-faced lie – blatant propaganda! The language, "The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States" is not even close to saying detention is inapplicable to US Citizens. How many Congressmen just read the summary and based their entire vote on that lie?

The thing I find most frustrating is knowing that I am not the only one out there seeing and shouting the truth. I have heard statements by Sen. Rand Paul, Sen. Mike Lee, and others. I watched the debate in Congress. I know YOU and other patriot citizens have been contacting their Congressmen and Senators, DEMANDING action. I really believe if at least a handful of people have enough information to make an informed and educated decision, there is no excuse to believe a lie. And there is certainly no excuse to settle for a lie.

Yet, that is where we are unless we FORCE CONGRESS TO FIX THIS BILL.

DON'T BELIEVE A LIE BECAUSE IT MAKES YOU FEEL SAFE.

Listen to these words of Justice Blackstone, as quoted by Alexander Hamilton in Federalist Paper 84.

"'To bereave a man of life, [says he] or by violence to confiscate his estate, without accusation or trial, would be so gross and notorious an act of despotism, as must at once convey the alarm of tyranny throughout the whole nation; but confinement of the person, by secretly hurrying him to jail, where his sufferings are unknown or forgotten, is a less public, a less striking, and therefore a more dangerous engine of arbitrary government. 'And as a remedy for this fatal evil he is everywhere peculiarly emphatical in his encomiums on the habeas corpus act, which in one place he calls 'the BULWARK of the British Constitution.'"

This is EXACTLY what these provision in the NDAA do. We do not have to keep these provisions to fund the military. They are completely irrelevant to that need.

The truth is out there. You have a responsibility to it. Our elected Congressmen and Senators have a responsibility to it. Don't let them get away with promulgating a distortion and destruction of that truth. DEMAND THEY FIX THIS TERRIBLE LEGISLATION, AND RESTORE OUR CIVIL LIBERTIES!

We must know that we cannot have peace from terrorism without having liberty in America! Don't sell our liberty for a little temporary security. It is not our liberty to sell. Our Founding Fathers pledged their lives, their fortunes, their sacred honor for ages and millions not yet born. This liberty belongs to our children, our grandchildren, and their children.

WE MUST STAND FOR LIBERTY TODAY OR OUR CHILDREN WILL BOW TO TYRANTS TOMORROW!

Keep Faith,

Lynne Roberts, President
Americans United for Freedom

auf_KrisAnneHallLogoKrisAnne Hall is a former prosecutor and Constitutional attorney who was fired from her job for teaching the Constitution to citizen groups. She is a disabled veteran of the US Army, a Russian linguist, a mother, a pastor's wife and a patriot. Her former employer, State Attorney for Florida's 3rd Judicial Circuit, gave her a choice – give up her First Amendment right to speak on her own time or be fired. KrisAnne said, "My First Amendment rights are worth more than a paycheck and I will not surrender them." She now travels the country and teaches the Constitution and the history that gave us our founding documents. We are proud to have KrisAnne as a contributor to Americans United for Freedom.

To send a check, please complete and print a contribution page form
and mail it with your donation to this address:

Americans United for Freedom
PO Box 1310
Herndon, VA 20172

Americans United for Freedom is a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization (pending) which focuses on nonpartisan civic education and advocacy regarding important national issues.

2012-01-13T19:57:00.000-08:00

Obama’s Ineligibility, Elective Despotism and the Vote of Slaves

WITH A DEAD CONSTITUTION, IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO WINS THE PRESIDENCY IN 2012

by Lawrence Sellin, ©2012

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Is this document dead?

(Jan. 12, 2012) — If re-elected, Barack Obama will kill the United States quickly. Any one of the leading Republican candidates will simply do it more slowly.

The erosion of the Constitution and our Constitutional rights has been happening quietly for a long time. With the election of Obama in 2008, corrupt politicians, their operatives and the mainstream media just decided not to bother hiding that fact anymore.

Corrupt American politicians, the operational arm of the multinational, wealthy and networked elite, preserve the illusion of democracy for the now disenfranchised voters, while journalists, falsely proclaiming themselves as tireless defenders of liberty, then distort the news in an attempt to manipulate public opinion.

The arrogance of Washington, D.C. has not abated, but has only gotten more brazen since 1993, when Lewis H. Lapham (“A Wish for Kings”) wrote:

“The politicians dress up the deals in the language of law or policy, but they’re in the business of brokering the tax revenue, and what keeps them in office is not their talent for oratory but their skill at redistributing the national income in a way that rewards their clients, patrons, friends and campaign contributors.”

Our politicians see every election as a license to steal from ordinary, hard-working Americans, permission to flout the law and avoid all accountability for destroying the country for the benefit of a few.

We no longer have representatives of the people, but elected despots who consider elections as mere formalities and citizens as their slaves.

By all measures, both the Republican and Democratic Parties are asking voters again to endorse the corrupt status quo.

In 2008, both parties permitted the election of Obama, a Constitutionally illegal President, who has forged his birth documents and his Selective Service registration. He has committed identity theft by using a Social Security Number not issued to him.

Questions about Obama ineligibility and his crimes have been intentionally suppressed by the political establishment and the media because the truth about Obama would so outrage the American people that the entire corrupt political system and its servants in the mainstream media would collapse.

Perhaps it is time to let it do so, by declaring Obama unconstitutional and boycotting Republican candidates, until such time when they openly address the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people and the greatest Constitutional crisis since the Civil War.

It is those corrupt politicians and a compliant media who have eroded our Constitution, stripped us of our Constitutional rights and destroyed the Founders model of a government of the people, by the people and for the people.

When will Congress launch an investigation into the criminal and usurper in the Oval Office? When will senior members of the military or the federal law enforcement agencies stand by their oaths to support and defend the Constitution?

The answer is “never.” There has been a colossal failure of leadership. We have a government littered with careerists, sycophants, cowards, liars and the greedy.

Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin stated:

“We are the heirs of those who froze with Washington at Valley Forge and who held the line at Gettysburg, who freed the slaves to close a shameful chapter, and who carved a nation out of the wilderness. We are the sons and daughters of those who stormed the beaches of Normandy and raised the flag at Iwo Jima and made America the strongest, the most prosperous, the greatest nation on earth forever in mankind’s history – the greatest, most exceptional nation.”

We owe it to those American heroes and to our posterity to fight the evil now permeating our government and society. We must not fail. Our country’s survival is in the balance.

Obama is not a natural born citizen, that is, a US citizen at birth, born of two US citizen parents at the time of his birth. He has never been eligible for the office of President.

The 2012 election will be a turning point in American history because our Constitution is in the balance. Let the politicians again ignore the Constitution and it is the end of our republic.

Patriots must speak out, oppose the corrupt political establishment and remove Obama from the state ballots.

There will be no second chance to take our country back.

———————————————————-

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com

2012-01-11T15:10:00.000-08:00

A Discussion of Historical and Contemporary Meanings of “natural born Citizen”

HAS A “RECONCEPTUALIZATION” OCCURRED?

by Rule of Law

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Do the definitions in Black's Law Dictionary agree with those in the U.S. Constitution?

(Jan. 11, 2012) — Editor’s Note: On January 10, 2012, The Post & Email published an article about a ballot challenge dismissed in the state of Alabama on January 9 in which we said of Bradley Davidson, the Executive Director of the Alabama Democrat Party, “He stated that his understanding was that in order to be considered ‘natural born,’ one must be born on American soil or U.S. territory.” In response, a reader wrote:

I have finally figured out where this is coming from and it explains a lot of the hostility found in the courts against citizen voters and their concern with Constitutional Eligibility. It is the understanding of the definition of “natural born citizen” itself and the document that controls that definition.

Black’s Law Dictionary is considered secondary only to U.S. Supreme Court rulings as a legal source. It was first published in the 19th century and is in its Ninth Edition. However, in 1991, the Fifth Edition, the definition for natural born citizens was stated as follows:

Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad. (Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., 1991, p.1026)

http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm Section 4.1.

Native. A nature-born subject or citizen; a denizen by birth; one who owes his domicile or citizenship to the fact of his birth within the country referred to. The term may also include one born abroad, if his parents were citizens of the country, and not permanently residing in foreign parts. U. S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649, 18 S.Ct. 456, 42 L.Ed. 890; New Hartford v. Canaan, 54 Conn. 39, 5 A. 360; Oken v. Johnson, 160 Minn. 217, 199 N.W. 910.

The word “native,” as used in Alien Enemy Act, refers to a person’s place of birth, so that a person remains a native of country of birth, though he has moved away therefrom. United States ex rel. D’Esquiva v. Uhi, C.C.A. N. Y. 137 F.2d. 903, 905.

One who was born in Germany and later becomes a citizen of France was a “native” of Germany. Ex parte Gregoire, D.C.Cal., 61 F.Supp. 92, 93.

But a person born in Alsace which at the time of his birth was a part of Germany but was restored to France by the Treaty of Versailles of 1919 was a “native” of France. United States ex rel. Umecker v. McCoy, D.C.N.D., 54 F.Supp. 679, 681, 682.

Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition (1951) page 1176.

This is the controlling definition being protected by the judicial system. It is not grounded in the Constitution but in British Common law. It is not grounded in the U.S. Constitution but in a misinterpreted U.S. Supreme Court case written by a justice appointed by then-President Chester Arthur. This is the definition of a natural born subject, not a natural born citizen as understood by the wording of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5.

And yet in another law dictionary:

Native, native citizen. A natural-born subject. 1 Bla. Com 366. Those born in a country, of parents of who are citizens. Morse, Citizenship 12. See Citizen. There is no distinction between native born as used in the French Extradition treaty and natural born as used in the extradition act; 37 W. R. 269.

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Third Revision (8th Edition)(1914), Volume 2, page 2297.

It would seem that the definition of “natural born citizen” has changed over the years, and yet the basic assumed understanding of the definition in the context of the Constitutional eligibility criteria for “natural born citizen” remains constant: a natural born citizen is a person born on U.S. soil to U.S.-citizen parents.

An article published by the Yale Law School written by Rebekka Susan Bonner (2008) acknowledges a near-universal acceptance of the assertion that all persons born within the United States are natural born (Bonner, p. 3).

It goes on to state that there is a concerted effort by lawyers and politicians to change the self-defining concept of “natural born citizen” in favor of a “new interpretative approach that would expand the number of American citizens who may be considered natural born for purposes of presidential eligibility; how Congress might operationalize these new understandings and why reconceptualization of the meaning of the citizen clause is preferable to previous interpretations of Article II.” (Bonner, Abstract).

The bottom line is that the majority of lawyers, politicians, and judges practicing in this country have subverted the definition of “natural born citizen” found in Minor v. Happersett with the definition for a British natural born subject and have chosen U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark to set the definition. It is clear that these two U.S. Supreme Court rulings are in conflict with one another and the definition of “natural born citizen” is yet to finalized.

Any lawsuit going forward needs to consider this and address it head-on by declaring the sitting judge a hostile participant to the hearing biased in favor of British common law instead of the U.S. Constitution.

It isn’t race. It is a profound and fundamental misunderstanding of what Black’s Law Dictionary is. It is a collection of British Common laws and not based on the U.S. Constitution. It works in the U.S. because many of the legal terms used today in the practice of law are the same whether utilized in English Common law or U.S. law.

What I would like to know is why someone felt the need to put this definition in Black’s Law Dictionary in 1991? In the second printing, there is a clear distinction between “subject” and “citizen.”

This is why the lawsuits are being dismissed for either lack of jurisdiction or lack of standing without hearings on the merits. The definition which the American people understand for the term “natural born citizen” based on its context in the U.S. Constitution is not the same definition under which the judicial system and lawyers are operating. The disconnect could not be more profound. Furthermore, this new definition has been implemented without the consent of the governed.

2012-01-01T16:37:00.000-08:00

New Hampshire House of Representatives Members to Hold Press Conference on Obama’s Eligibility on January 3

“WE NEED TO INFORM THE PUBLIC”

by Sharon Rondeau

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

New Hampshire produced the first state constitution on January 5, 1776, prior to the American Revolution

(Jan. 1, 2012) — On January 3, 2012, several members of the New Hampshire House of Representatives will hold a press conference with the primary purpose of informing New Hampshire citizens and registered voters that Barack Hussein Obama may not be eligible to serve as president and therefore should not have his name appear on the 2012 presidential ballot.

The time and place are tentatively set for 10:00 a.m. outside of the Legislative Office Building in Concord.

The website of the New Hampshire House of Representatives provides the following history regarding its beginnings:

Although threatened with reprisals from the British Crown and a bitterly divided constituency, New Hampshire’s leaders set the course for self-government in January 1776. Determined to keep the government close to the people, our forefathers fixed the size of the House of Representatives as a direct ratio to the state’s population. The first House consisted of 87 members, each one representing 100 families. As time passed and the population increased, the number of Representatives grew, until there were 443. In 1942, a constitutional amendment limited the size of the House to 400 but not less than 375 members. As a result, the New Hampshire House is the largest state legislative body in the United States.

New Hampshire has the largest House of Representatives in the nation. The Concord Monitor has stated that New Hampshire has “the most localized representation of any state in the country.”

On November 15, 2011, Atty. Orly Taitz filed a complaint with the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission regarding the placing of Obama’s name on the state ballot, citing his use of a social security number not assigned to him as well as having presented two forged birth certificates as proof that he was born in Hawaii. Several state representatives joined the complaint, and citizens from around the country filed challenges as well. A U.S. Army reserve retired colonel has launched a campaign to prevent Obama’s name from being included on the New Hampshire ballot.

The New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission responded to Taitz by holding a hearing on November 18, during which Taitz presented her case challenging Obama’s constitutional eligibility, focusing on the crimes which she alleged he committed.

Although the New Hampshire Secretary of State’s office has disallowed candidates from running for the presidency due to foreign birthplaces in the recent past, the decision of the Ballot Law Commission was that because Obama completed the application and paid the requisite $1,000 fee, it could not prevent his name from appearing on the 2012 ballot.

Atty. Taitz has since stated that “massive election fraud” is occurring in New Hampshire because it appears that in 2008, boxes of ballots were left out on tables rather than locked in a vault, which Gardner admitted in a video to be a deviation from standard protocol.

Nine members of the New Hampshire House attended the hearing of the Ballot Law Commission, one of whom was Rep. Laurence Rappaport (R-Coos). Rappaport stated that there were nine representatives present at the Ballot Law Commission hearing and that some or all of them organized the press conference to be held on Tuesday, January 3, 2012.

We first asked him about his reaction to the outcome of the Ballot Law Commission hearing, he responded, “I was extremely disappointed.”

We then asked him about the investigation called for by Attorney General Michael Delaney regarding alleged misconduct on the part of some of the representatives at the Ballot Law Commission hearing. Rappaport’s response was, “There were two investigations. One was by the House Security, run by Randy Joyner, and he reported to the Speaker of the House, and the Attorney General asked the State Police to investigate. Neither one of them contacted me, probably because although I was there, I never said anything. The results of the investigation, as I understand it, were that there were no threats made, and it was basically a non-event.”

Rappaport said that at the time we spoke with him on December 31, a statement to be made at the press conference was in second-draft format. Working on the statement with him are Reps. Lou and Carol Vita and Harry Accornero.

“What we really need to do is emphasize that Barack Obama was not eligible and is not eligible to become president. At the Ballot Law hearing, the Commission and the Assistant Secretary of State said publicly, under oath, on the record, that their authority was only to see that the paperwork was properly filled out and that the $1,000 fee was paid. If you go back a little farther, you find out that they had disqualified a man named Sal Mohamed and another named Abdul Hassan. There are letters, of which we have copies, signed by Karen Ladd, the Assistant Secretary of State. So we applied for a rehearing, which was denied, and we applied to the New Hampshire Supreme Court, and last week they denied us a hearing. We can provide complete copies of all of these challenges.”

The Post & Email asked, “Were you surprised that your own state Supreme Court refused to hear your appeal?” and Rappaport responded, “Yes, I was surprised.” He stated that in the letter he received, having been one of the plaintiffs, no reason had been provided.

Rappaort described the purpose of the press conference:

Our biggest concern is that the public becomes aware of what’s going on. We think that the public does not understand, and it is our effort to try to enlighten them. I would cite three things: First of all, there was Emmerich de Vattel’s Law of Nations, which gave the definition at the time of the Founders. Second, there was the case Minor v. Happersett from 1875, which established the definition of “natural born Citizen” as one who has two American-citizen parents. We have tons of evidence that Obama’s alleged father was not a citizen. He never held a green card and was never a resident alien. In fact, the truth is he was thrown out of the country.

Rappaport also cited Senate Resolution 511, passed in April 2008, which declared that John McCain was a natural born Citizen by virtue of having two U.S.-citizen parents, but that Obama was not held to the same standard, and he “didn’t know why.”

The Post & Email asked Rappaport, “Do you think that most of your constituents support what you are doing?” and he responded, “Yes. Obama is definitely not very popular in northern New Hampshire.” He stated that Coos County is the largest land mass in the state, has only about 30,000 residents, and was the reason he moved there. New Hampshire has a total of about 1,300,000 residents.

As to his reason for questioning Obama’s eligibility, Rappaport said, “We all swore an oath to two constitutions: the state constitution and the U.S. Constitution. I take my oath very seriously, and I feel that I’m required by that oath to do this. I feel very strongly about that. I’ve received a death threat on this go-around and a lot of letters from people who disagree with me. I’ve been called names, but I’ve never gotten a reasoned explanation, not one. I feel as if everyone is claiming ‘This is a settled matter, but I haven’t heard that.’”

We then asked him, “Do you believe the April 27, 2011 purported birth certificate being released to the public is what they’re considering the point which ‘settled’ it?” and he responded, “It didn’t come from him specifically; it came from the ‘White House.’ It is my opinion that not only is it a forgery, but it is a lousy forgery. I printed it from the White House website, and I was able to take it apart using Adobe Illustrator. There were something like 12 different layers. Through a process called ‘flattening,’ which puts all the layers together such that they can’t be separated, the layers should have been flattened, although a document expert could have still determined that it was a forgery.”

Rappaport stated that his background was in electrical engineering and that he “wrote computer software.” He said his skills include laying out a website, although he sometimes “hired other people” to do things beyond his skill level and is not a computer “expert.” Other New Hampshire representatives also have stated that they believe the image is a forgery.

The press conference is expected to last about 30 minutes, and New Hampshire media will be notified. “There’s no guarantee that any major media will cover it, but my biggest hope is that major media is finally waking up. When I was growing up, I read The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. Back then, The Times, in particular, was a really good newspaper. What you read on the front page was news, and what you read on the Editorial page was opinion, and the two were not mixed. Today, the news is highly biased. I feel as if The New York Times and The Washington Post report on a story only if it’s something they agree with. If it’s something they don’t agree with, it doesn’t appear anywhere. If it’s something that they mostly agree with, then you’ll find it on page 40.”

Rappaport is 71 and serving his second term in the New Hampshire House. He stated that the organizers of the press conference would have preferred to have more time to plan, but the New Hampshire primary is fast approaching on January 10 and they want to inform the people of what they believe has transpired. The group will also invite the attorney general and all New Hampshire representatives. “My plan is to put out an announcement to all representatives inviting them to support us and to come,” he said.

Final details of the time and place will be released shortly.

2011-12-28T14:25:00.000-08:00

Let Us Engage the Real Enemy – Please!

“OVERWHELMING SHAME”

by Neil Sankey, ©2011

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

If the above image is a forgery, is it because Obama's identity and parentage are different from what has been presented to the public?

(Dec. 28, 2011) — I have just re-read an article from Mario Apuzzo’s blog dated Wednesday May 12, 2010:

The Nonsense Published by Our Nation’s Editors Regarding Obama’s Eligibility to be President

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/nonsense-published-by-our-nations.html

This was a very informative and comprehensive discussion of the whole natural born Citizen issue and the differing viewpoints relative to it. It is yet another outstanding example of how citizens, ordinary people, can, and have, become enmeshed by this frustrating and exasperating situation. Interestingly, it leads almost instantly to conflict amongst ourselves.

Of course, this is only the tip of the iceberg; there is much, much more to be said, and countless books will be written in the forthcoming years detailing over and over the extremes to which these ordinary people felt compelled to continue their endless fight to overcome overwhelming complacency, stand up and fight.

Reading articles such as these leaves me feeling only one all-encompassing emotion:

SHAME!

Yes, overwhelming shame that our great country has not, cannot and, and seemingly will not rise to defeat this evil which engulfs us.

Patriots, believers, Constitutionalists, theorists, researchers and writers, we can do no more. NOT that I would ever suggest for a moment giving up. But, we have done, collectively, all that could ever reasonably be expected of any people to engender and initiate a full and complete investigation and prosecution of the perpetrators of this enormous fraud. We have done ENOUGH; it should be happening NOW!.

Yes, I am deeply ASHAMED of the spineless, self-centered politicians particularly, and ashamed of the Judges, both of the Supreme Court and all of the other Judges in this enormous land. So far, not one of these “so-called” Civic Leaders has the intestinal fortitude to emerge from their pampered cocoons to realize that we, the Country, is in dire distress and action is immediately required!

One must also be ashamed, regretfully, at the Law Enforcement organizations within this country. Their Oaths are plain; they are, without exception, sworn to protect US, “WE THE PEOPLE,” not the ruling regime. To date they have not stepped up to this task, with one or two very welcome exceptions; maybe there is just a shred of hope!.

I am ashamed of the real “Democrats” if they still exist. Where are the true Citizens in the Democrat Party, and why are they not complaining loudly from the rooftops that their party has been infiltrated and taken over by the Islamo-Marxists?

“Islamo-Marxists?” they say, “Oh, no, you can’t say that!” Conservative Presidential Candidate Governor Romney (allegedly a “Conservative”) won’t even use the term “Socialist,” let alone “Marxist!” Now, how on this God’s Earth are we going to solve this problem when our “own people” don’t have the guts to call it what it really is! Was it not Malcolm X himself at the Hajj who realized the true impact and power to be had by the association of Marxism and Islam? Or dare we not mention that?

Which takes me to another point which seems to be confusing some, including “Birthers” and “Tea Partiers” alike. For some time, I have espoused the opinion that Malcolm X may, in some way, be involved in the ancestry of our current White House Occupant. Recent brilliant narrative by the renowned author Martha Trowbridge has taken us all by storm. Her story-line, so far, is strongly suggestive of the urgent need for a new look at the parentage of “The One” and especially offers a basis for his extreme views.

“It contradicts everything we have fought for,” some have said!

NO, IT DOES NOT; think about it!

After all we have done so far, I have never seen one scrap of hard definitive proof of the original “Dunham” story. It could well be a story that has been created, or a “Re-invention,” as Malcolm would have called it.

What does exist has either been proven to be forgeries (Birth Certificates) or could easily be forgeries. Most every photograph has been altered or retouched. Indeed, one little-known fact is the photograph on a beach, cited time and again, allegedly showing Stanley Ann Dunham in a bikini, which is generally used to display the fact that she was not pregnant, and is in fact a photograph of none other than Barbara BUSH in her younger days!. The original may be seen in the Reagan Library!

This is deception, folks! This is Marxism at its best.

” The issue is not the issue!”

“The end is what you want; the means is how you get it.”

It does not matter; it is all FRAUD.

“So, if he was born in New York to Jo Ann Newman and Malcolm X, that would make him a Natural Born Citizen, right?”

It does not matter; it is all FRAUD.

IS IT NOT TIME SOMETHING WAS DONE ABOUT IT??

Yes, it is frustrating; it leads to arguments amongst ourselves since we always seem to want to viciously attack everyone else’s ideas!

I am sure that we are all so tired of the endless fighting and bickering amongst ourselves on the various blogs, our adversaries are defeating us before we start.

I would call on you all to STOP IT, put it aside. Yes, all of you: bloggers and others who have these petty arguments on the internet, open for all our adversaries to see. STOP, put aside all your EGOs for once, because the people you are fighting are not your real enemies.

READ Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” and USE IT AGAINST THEM!

Go to David Horowitz’s bookstore and read some of those; they are cheap enough!

http://frontpagemag.com/store/

There is a man in the White House who will not properly identify himself, and WE SIMPLY DO NOT KNOW WHO OUR “PRESIDENT” IS.

It is no small wonder that they don’t want voters to identify themselves at the polls!

So, America, as you relax this Christmas week, you may safely assume that we have a total fraud in the office of President with his Malcolm X, Saul Alinsky, Cloward and Piven, Marxist-Leninist-influenced finger on the nuclear trigger. He is in charge of your military and calling all the shots, taking away your freedoms, rights and demanding yet another Trillion to waste on paybacks to his buddies!

Is that OK with you, America?

FOR GOD’S SAKE, PEOPLE, IT IS OUR COUNTRY, OUR WAY OF LIFE, OUR VERY EXISTENCE THAT IS AT STAKE HERE!

Is it not high time we all put aside our differences, real or imagined, and band together to defeat this scourge with one voice?

2011-12-12T11:24:00.000-08:00

What if OPOVV is Not the Next POTUS?

RESTORING THE REPUBLIC

by One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet

Editor's Note: See my Reply at the bottom of this article.

Should the Federal Reserve, a private corporation with foreign ties, have control of our currency and economy?

(Dec. 11, 2011) — Good question. Let’s talk turkey for a couple of minutes. The chances that America will choose a President in 2012 who will stop this downward spiral into oblivion, an unrecognizable America, are so remote as to be nonsensical. That’s right, a Dark Horse who has made it as plain as the day is long that he will not take one red cent in campaign contributions from any source whatsoever to run for President won’t be elected because most of Americans don’t get it and never will. Okay, they elected Obama, but that’s not the point. These people are so far gone to the Dark Side that they’d elect Obama for a second term, presumably so he could enact Sharia Law as the law of the land.

“Necks First! Jobs Second!” should be the campaign slogan for all of the candidates. That’s right, why waste time talking about jobs and healthcare when the chances are that you may not be around to see any of it anyway? We are at war with Islam, a Totalitarian system of government that wants America so bad they can taste it. Deport each and every Muslim from the United States, including American citizens who want to play traitor. Give them a choice: leave or prison, because being a Muslim is tantamount to being a traitor: you either support the Constitution or you’re out of here. And if anyone has a problem with that, you’re more than welcome to move: it’s what we call freedom.

The word “illegal” has lost its punch; I say we put the punch back in. How? It’s really very simple: deport each and every illegal immigrant. Oh, you say the children are in high school but the parents are illegal, what then? Wax in your ear? It’s doable so let’s do it. If the parents don’t respect American law, I wouldn’t hold my breath to give out future citizenship awards to their illegal offspring.

Abolish the Federal Reserve Bank by not renewing its charter, which ends December 2013. Get the dollar backed by a physical entity; a dollar being equal to a carrot is worth more than a dollar equal to an empty promise.

Render every law that the imposter Obama signed null and void along with every rule and regulation enacted under the illegal Obama regime. Abolish the Department of Homeland Security. Introduce a flat sales tax of 10% and abolish the IRS and all of its deferments and shelters, forever ancient history.

And that’s for starters, that is, if we want our country back and our safety improved.

And speaking of safety, stop this “revolving door” so-called system of justice we have in America. The escalating drug violence can be attributed to America’s insatiable appetite to fill up the empty hours of the empty lives of people whose food on the table is not dependent on their total mental commitment. Those who ingest the drugs are contributing to the downfall of the Empire of Freedom by diverting resources that would otherwise be available to target other illegal activity; money, time and effort wasted pursuing the transportation and distribution of illegal substances could be spent on educating people on the advantages of education, the belief being that a knowledgeable citizen is more valuable to the welfare of the general good than a complete loser, because irrespective of how much money is thrown at a problem, it’s all for nothing if those on the receiving end don’t receive the help.

Johnny can’t read; hell, Johnny can’t even speak proper English, can’t diagram a sentence, and most likely doesn’t have, and never will have, a high school diploma.

Is it Johnny’s fault that he was raised on Gangsta Rap lyrics, that he was passed from grade to grade without ever learning to read? Oh, Johnny can read, but he was never taught the reason to gain knowledge from a book. Yes, at some point Johnny has to put two and two together, or you know what? We’ll have on our hands millions of losers like the character in Richard Wright’s Native Son and we’ll end up with an uneducated voter electing someone like Obama. Wait, it’s already been done, which just goes to show you that the whole education system DOESN”T WORK.

I’d fix it, and the best and fastest way to at least get it started is a high school diploma and a driver’s license, in English.

Look, fixing the mistakes of the past may not be easy or popular, but if we don’t do it and do it NOW, we’ll have nobody to blame but ourselves when the green flag of Islam is raised over the White House.

OPOVV@yahoo.com

Editor's Reply:
Right on, OPOVV..
However, What if OPOVV IS the Next POTUS?

What seems IMPROBABLE, UNPREDICTABLE, and IMPOSSIBLE to man…
is POSSIBLE to God, if we but turn it over to Him in faith… trusting, believing.

God has ALWAYS used the improbable, unpredictable and impossible ones that were willing to yield to Him in obedience. ie: Moses, David, Daniel, John, Peter, etc.

What does God want YOU to do? Maybe, just maybe, be the next POTUS.
Are YOU willing to allow Him to lead you… one step at a time?
If so, I am addressing the next POTUS.
… With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible. (Matt 19:26b)

2011-12-12T11:15:00.000-08:00

Direct Message to Obama

“I’M GOING TO SEND YOU PACKING”

by One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet

Esquire Representation Declaration signed and notarized on December 5, 2011 by presidential candidate Tom MacLeran

(Dec. 6, 2011) — A couple of months ago, I challenged you, the de facto illegal Muslim immigrant con artist masquerading as the President of the United States, to an open debate, and I stated that you could have your administration with you to kibitz, if needed. I wasn’t even afforded a “Sorry, not today” response. Alright, I’m a big boy, my feelings weren’t hurt, but I still want you out of my future house. That’s right, I’m going to send you packing.

This One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet is stepping up to the plate; actually, ALL FIFTY OF THEM, and I, along with a few others, most notably Orly Taitz, Esq, are going to be your worst nightmare. This is not a threat: I never waste my time with threats, never have, never will. If I say it, consider it done. You’re going down, and I’m the one who’s going to do it. I am a qualified-eligible-United States natural born Citizen-Honorably discharged Vietnam Veteran with Good Conduct-candidate for President in 2012-Natural Born part Native American Indian and a Patriot and you, Barry Soetoro, or whatever you’re calling yourself today, are nothing but an embarrassment. You’re in my country, and I want you outta here.

OPOVV@yahoo.com

—————————

Editor’s Note: The text of the Declaration reads:

I, Thomas G. MacLeran, am a registered candidate with the Federal Elections Commission in the Republican Party, September 27, 2011 — FEC CANDIDATE ID NUMBER P20003463 — running against Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and others, in the primaries and caucuses.

I am attesting that I am joining Attorney Orly Taitz in her complaints in all 50 states of the union, challenging the eligibility of Barack Obama by the demands set forth in the U.S.C. United States Ballot as a qualified candidate.

I further attest to those reading this: With Obama’s own released Long Form Birth Certificate showing his father to be a citizen of Kenya, East Africa at the time of Obama’s birth that Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America, according to the precedent of U.S.C. Art II Sect. I Clause 5 and the United States Supreme Court Law in Minor v. Happersett confirming those born to “citizens” “within the United States” were never in doubt of being a “Natural Born Citizen”.

I would like to be represented by Attorney Taitz in the State of California and pro hac vice in 49 other states if the law will allow pro hac vice representation. I expressly would like to be represented by Orly Taitz before Judge Rhonda Nishimura in Hawaii and Judge Michael Malihi in Georgia, as well as other judges to be signed in other states. In case pro hac vice is not granted, I wish to be a co-plaintiff with Attorney Taitz and I state that this action does not impede my filing any other claim if the representation of the declaration is not satisfied.

I declare under penalty of perjury, that the above is true and correct.

I am aware that Attorney Taitz is licensed in the State of California, and admitted to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit and the Supreme Court of the United States. I am aware that she is not licensed in other states and I expressly waive all liability claims against Attorney Taitz and any and all entities affiliated with her, arising out of the representation of me.

Thomas G. MacLeran

2011-12-12T09:29:00.000-08:00

IF OBAMA LOSES, HE INTENDS TO BRING DOWN THE COUNTRY WITH HIM
Members of Congress Cower or Collaborate, As Obama Prepares his Race and Class War
by Lawrence Sellin, ©2011

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Obama's supporters claim that his alleged birth in Hawaii is enough to make him a "natural born Citizen," but scholars such as Dr. Herb Titus invoking "natural law" claim that his foreign father precludes it

(Dec. 12, 2011) — Win or lose, chaos is at the core of Obama’s 2012 campaign strategy.

The Constitution and the American way of life are already under intense assault by enemies of the republic. The signs of degeneration are out there in plain sight.

The Obama Administration has spent the United States treasury to the brink of national bankruptcy, which has set the stage for the desired social unrest.

The Occupy War Street movement was just a test of Obama’s chaos strategy. The weakness demonstrated by politicians nationwide has only encouraged future, larger and more violent confrontations to support the Obama agenda either to transform America by force or, if that fails, destroy her.

Expect Occupy Flash Mobs to increase attacks on businesses and Obama opponents.

Watch for the number of premeditated racial incidents to increase.

To shape the outcome, the Obama campaign will continue to solicit international pressure directed at American election procedures and voters.

Obama will encourage open borders to flood the country with illegal immigrants to sow disorder and intimidate potential Republican voters.

Spearheaded by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder, the Obama Administration is promoting policies that could make criticism of Islam a crime in the United States and erode our First Amendment rights.

Martial law could be an option under consideration.

The Senate’s 2012 National Defense Authorization Act would allow the military to detain American citizens indefinitely without trial.

Coincidentally, the U.S. Army is aggressively recruiting Internment/Resettlement Specialists (31E), who are primarily responsible for day-to-day operations in a military confinement and correctional facility or detention and internment facility.

Meanwhile, Obama and his Congressional allies continue to weaken our national defense.

Defying standard procedures to recover or destroy it, Obama allowed the Iranians to capture the technologically advanced RQ-170 drone.

Obama’s appalling decision permits America’s enemies to reverse-engineer the stealth spy drone, unlocking the aircraft’s structural and software secrets and undermining national security.

That outcome may not be terribly surprising because George Soros, Obama’s puppet master, funds the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), a powerful Iranian government lobbying group in Washington, D.C. The NIAC chief, Trita Parsi, has been described as”an intellectually dishonest regime apologist and an unofficial and unregistered lobbyist for the Iranian regime.”

To further undermine the American military readiness, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), along with 91 other senators, approved the 926-page Defense Department authorization bill that included a provision to repeal the military’s ban on sodomy and bestiality.

When future historians study the sunset of the American republic, they will shake their heads in disbelief, knowing that Obama could have been removed from office at any time, if only members of Congress had not been stupid, corrupt or cowardly.

Obama is not a natural born citizen and he has never been eligible for the office of President. See the explanation here and here.

In addition, Obama has forged his birth documents and Selective Service registration and uses a Social Security number not issued to him.

Unfortunately, Republican leaders have decided to maintain a protective shield of silence and dispense disinformation about Obama’s Constitutionally illegal Presidency and his crimes in order to hide their own complicity in the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.

The chaos is coming and those disgraceful politicians will have blood on their traitorous hands.

———————–

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com

2011-11-25T19:37:00.000-08:00

Jo Ann Newman: Far From Dead, Far From Gone

“ALL THIS, FOR HER TREASURED SON”

by Martha Trowbridge, ©2011, blogging at Terrible Truth

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

This work is protected by United States Copyright Law. PLEASE REFER TO THE REPRINT/QUOTATION POLICY LINK HERE

(Nov. 25, 2011) — Last week, I saw an image that made me very sad.

It was the Visitors Book at Canberra, The Australian War Memorial.

The page’s dedication was inscribed:

The Honorable Barack Obama

President Of The United States Of America

As I studied his face in photos of the event, I wondered whether, as President “Barack Obama” inscribed it on 17 November 2011, he had the same thought I did: Some day soon this page will be torn from the book, and burned in disgrace.

He knows as well as we do: there is no honor in deceit.

Like presenting a synthetic mother, and synthetic photos of that mother – in slavitude – yes, slavitude – to his desperate determination to win The United States Presidency.

Like feeding fake after fake story to America’s media, counting on their good-hearted nature to print whatever he hands them.

Like despicably claiming his mother is dead – to keep her far from prying eyes.

For, America, the Truth is: the Mother of “Barack Obama’ is far from dead, far from obese, and far from ‘folksy’.

She’s been far from Indonesia, too.

All these years, The Mother of America’s “President” has been here, in America, working hard to support her treasured social causes.

She’s honored and respected.

She’s lovely, industrious, competent, and oh so committed to carrying on her lifelong shared vision with her beloved, Malcolm X: an America in which African Americans share generously in all the opportunities and rewards America has to offer.

Because I’m praying that her son will step forth and do the right thing, I am – for the moment – withholding her current identifying information.

The last thing I want to do is invade her life. She’s been through too much already.

Think about it.

She’s been shut out, silenced, ‘killed off’. She’s been represented by unflattering images. Her actual, lovely image has been distorted to grotesque.

She’s been lied about, used, and bandied to suit The Obama Campaign purposes.

She’s even been obscured from posterity, in video and stills, when on that horrific February day at the Audubon Ballroom, she kneeled, and lay over Malcolm, as he lay dying.

All this, for her treasured son.

The son she shared with her beloved, Malcolm X. The son upon whose tiny body they pinned their dreams for a fairer America.

As I contemplate this exceptional woman’s life, I wonder how many of those around her share her secret.

I wonder what they must think about all that she’s had to sacrifice, all these years, living incognito - in order that her mule headed son advance his career, his way.

Jo Ann Newman, living, clearly living, for years and years, though her son has pronounced her dead.

How hard it must have been for her – cause or no cause – to sacrifice personal recognition – for decades. For most of her adult life, really. Jo Ann Newman, in these demanding decades of women’s lib, ever-living through the lives of those she loved, placing her own life behind theirs.

For, since they met in the 1950′s, for the sake of Malcolm’s reputation, Jo Ann sacrificed public recognition of her role as his lover and mother of his child.

And since the early 1990′s, because “Barack Obama” deemed her a huge political liability, Jo Ann has been unable to publicly associate with her and Malcolm’s son.

It takes strength of character to make such great sacrifices.

Yet, isn’t that “true love”? The kind of love that puts the needs of your beloved ahead of your own?

Have you ever thought about this, Barack? That despite what you may feel, your mother truly loves you?

Barack: I entreat you, step into The Light.

Thousands of us will greet you in sincere, prayerful support of your decision to do the right thing.

We’ll applaud your step into Integrity in a way you’ve never before been applauded.

I promise you, Barack: the applause will be your sweetest ever – for it will be applause you earn honestly.

We know it won’t be easy. We also know it will be hugely relieving.

New, powerful, enduring pages could be inscribed in history:

The Honorable Barack Obama

The First World Leader To Make Things Right

As for you, dear Unsung Heroine Jo Ann Newman: please, reach out to your son. Just like you did with Malcolm, be strong for him. Guide him to the freeing power of Truth.

Now, more than ever, your son needs you.

2011-11-19T11:36:00.000-08:00

Stan The Sham, And True Love
by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/11/15/stan-the-sham-and-true-love/

This work is protected by United States Copyright Law. PLEASE REFER TO THE REPRINT/QUOTATION POLICY LINK ABOVE.

Today, Terrible Truth escorts you through the actual ‘Obama Birth Narrative’.

Don your hard hat and safety goggles. Pack plenty of aspirin. Once the lies start flying, it’s going to be rough going.

For the Truth is: there is no such person as Stanley Ann Dunham.

“Stanley Ann Dunham” was invented to hide the girl that “Barack Obama” judged America would never accept as the mother of a President. A 1950′s girl whose behavior, politics, and lifestyle wouldn’t find much approval, even today.

“Obama’s” real birth narrative isn’t set in an exotic American outpost. It’s got nothing to do with a corn-bred girl from Kansas, transplanted to Seattle, then once again uprooted, to be set in the soil of Hawaii.

It’s got nothing to do with a bigamous Kenyan, or college classmates engaging in sexual relations. No hasty marriage happened, in Hawaii or anywhere, once baby Bâri′ was conceived.

“Obama’s” real birth narrative runs like this:

Once upon a time, in the late 1950’s, a teenage girl from the Bronx – who was bright, rebellious and willful – fell head-over-heels for a charismatic, handsome, older man.

Her name was Jo Ann Newman.

It’s as simple as that.

However, she was white. He was black. She was single. He was married. She was a teenage ‘infidel’ ‘townie’. He was a Muslim Minister.

It’s as complicated as all this.

Despite her intelligence, teenage Jo Ann Newman was understandably naïve. She likely didn’t comprehend what she was getting herself into.

Unhappy in marriage, thirty-something Malcolm X was flattered by young Jo Ann’s devotion. He likely didn’t anticipate the far-reaching consequences of their sexual relationship.

He surely would not have predicted that half a century later, America would be engaged in digging up details about the son born of his relations with young Jo Ann.

But life has a way of yielding the unpredictable.

Especially when the energy invested is considerable – like Jo Ann’s investment in Malcolm.

If you want to get to the Truth, ask anyone who knew Malcolm back then. Were Manning Marable with us still, now that her name is no longer a secret, you might even get it from him.

Back then, Jo Ann was no secret. Everywhere she could, youthful Jo Ann Newman tagged alongside Malcolm. Not one speech or gathering could she bear to miss. New York or elsewhere, whenever, wherever possible, Jo Ann followed Malcolm. You might even say that during those years, Jo Ann Newman lived through him. Most times, when Malcolm was speaking, out in the crowd, there was Jo Ann. The stars in her eyes, the pride in her heart, the hope in her soul, tried as he might to resist, proved irresistible to Malcolm. Steady when he was fickle, dependable when he strayed, buoyant when he was down, Jo Ann was totally devoted to Malcolm and his cause – especially when he himself doubted. From the moment they met, til the moment he died, and eternally beyond, always, Jo Ann Newman was there for Malcolm X Shabazz. Cheering him on. Bolstering him up. Admiring, encouraging, and most of all, loving him – without conditions or expectations.

Malcolm was Jo Ann’s forever-and-ever-true-love – even when she tried to prove to herself he wasn’t.

From their interactions sprang an ‘improbable love’, as often characterized by their son Bâri′. A dynamic, idolizing – idolized, once-in-a-million-lifetimes love.

Because their relationship brought to birth “Barack Obama”, Jo Ann’s and Malcolm’s love will forever be framed as legendary. An un-erasable theme in the Malcolm X saga; painful to many, understandably, yet an integral part of who Malcolm the man was – often contradictory, often perplexing, oh so public yet oh so private.

I’ll leave to another post Jo Ann Newman’s close biological relationship to another American legend: radical activist Fred [Frederick] “Delano” Newman, who died this past July. Ditto, her ties with Sanford Newman of Project Vote. Enough is enough for one sitting.

Today, let’s keep our focus upon Jo Ann. How pained she was by Malcolm’s tragic death.

And what she wrote about it.

Jo Ann Newman’s Tribute To A Black Man was published less than one month after Malcolm’s assassination, on 20 March 1965 in New York’s Amsterdam News, a prominent black weekly newspaper.

It is here, America, for history to directly witness in her heartfelt words, that Jo Ann Newman boldly and openly memorialized her love for and devotion to the father of Bâri′ M. Shabazz [a.k.a. Barack Obama] – Malcolm X Shabazz.

Tribute To A Black Man was duly recorded in the F.B.I. files on Malcolm X.

The F.B.I., since 1953, ever-trailing Malcolm X.

The F.B.I., surely aware of Jo Ann Newman’s romantic relationship with Malcolm X.

Aware – and mindful – enough of their involvement, to add to their Malcolm X Files the eulogy Jo Ann published one month after Malcolm’s assassination.

Tribute To A Black Man is not only one of the few ’boutique’ newspaper articles included in the F.B.I.’s Malcolm X post-assassination files, it is the only personal testament written by a woman that the F.B.I. recorded.

Recall, in this blog’s foundational post “Saps, Stool Pigeons And Stanley Ann’s Hair” [http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/09/29/saps-stool-pigeons-and-stanley-anns-hair/] that Malcolm’s teenage lover was seated in the front row at the time of his assassination.

Could Jo Ann Newman be one of the names redacted in Malcolm’s F.B.I. files, as someone questioned?

Could she be the female who, within days of his death, provided the F.B.I. with details about upcoming events in honor of Malcolm – including the “TRIBUTE” scheduled before his funeral?

Recall, as well, that Malcolm X’s eyeglasses – missing at the scene of his assassination – seem to have re-surfaced on the nose of “Barack Obama”. [http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/another-cold-case-file-closed-malcolm-xs-missing-eyeglasses/]

Is it any wonder that the F.B.I. had their eye on Little Miss Jo Ann Newman?

Are we to now wonder whether, when vetting Presidential Candidate “Obama”, the F.B.I. was complicit in his family-of-origin coverup – or worse, unaware of his lineage?

In Tribute To A Black Man, a note to the readers appears atop Jo Ann’s text.

“Editor’s Note: Miss Jo Ann Newman works in the Classified Advertising Department of the New York Amsterdam News.

But she asked for – and was granted permission – to write her own story of Malcolm X’s funeral.

This is her story:

Tribute To A Black Man By Jo Ann Newman”

Source: FBI: Malcolm Little – Malcolm X – New York File 32 of 41, page 27-28.

Now, how on earth does young Miss Jo Ann Newman, a lowly clerk in the Classified Advertising Department, merit such journalistic prominence?

Hmmm.

Consider this: from that very same edition of the newspaper – 20 March 1965 – immediately following her Tribute, on page 39 we find this declaration:

“No one knew Malcolm X better than the Amsterdam News staff. Of that staff, no one knew Malcolm X better than Jim Booker.” Real Malcolm X / As Jimmy Booker Knew Him FBI: Malcolm Little – Malcolm X – New York File 32 of 41, page 29.

Jimmy Booker: Executive Editor, The New York Amsterdam News.

Jimmy Booker: close associate to Percy Sutton, Malcolm X’s lawyer.

“Jimmy Booker’s Amsterdam News columns were must read destinations for the African-American weekly faithful. “http://harlemworldblog.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/update-jimmy-bookers-passing/

Ask yourself this: how did lowly Miss Jo Ann rate positioning of her Tribute AHEAD of famed Jimmy Booker?

And why oh why is Jo Ann Newman associated with The New York Amsterdam News, in the first place?

Here’s why: who better to employ Jo Ann Newman than the black weekly paper, The New York Amsterdam News? Jo Ann Newman, ever-trotting-after-her-true-love-Malcolm X? Malcolm X, Hero to The New York Amsterdam News. Jo Ann Newman, the mother of Malcolm’s son – his promising male heir, he who will be bearer of Malcolm’s legacy.

So …….

Who better than The New York Amsterdam News, after Malcolm’s assassination, to give Jo Ann Newman, mother of Malcolm’s heir – Bâri′ M. Shabazz – a platform from which to profess her undying love?

At her Tribute’s outset, Jo Ann paints Malcolm thus: “The threshold of Life. A fallen angel.”

Immediately, she sets herself in contradistinction to Malcolm.

Malcolm, she states, is “A family man, A Black man, A Man, A leader.”

“I am what I am, so be it” she states in comparison.

Which can only mean, she is: An unwed mother, A White woman, a Woman, a follower.

Hmmm. Sounds awfully familiar, doesn’t it? Sounds like the mother of the man who presents himself as “Barack Obama”.

With each line, Jo Ann’s obvious prominence in the life of Malcolm X emerges.

“It is Saturday, Feb, 27, 1965. Faith Temple Church of God in Christ. I am standing in the pulpit, set aside for the newspapers, and all media’s of our great news services [my emphasis].”

Now, how could little Miss Newman, classified advertising clerk at the Amsterdam News, be standing alongside the national media – unless …. ?

Unless she has a rightful place there. A family-type-relationship place. In her Tribute, Jo Ann’s words relay the odd position she occupies: like Betty Shabazz, she is a grieving widow; but one who, for propriety’s sake, must go unrecognized.

For Jo Ann Newman, the political abruptly veers into the personal:

“I am watching history in the making. I am watching the world’s leaders from all fields arrive. We are here together. Yet, why then am I alone? My thoughts entirely of a Black man, who has been struck down, his body lies below me.”

An obvious sexualized reference. Is it conscious or unconscious on her part? Does she want us to know, via her words, that she and he were lovers?

It seems that she did – she continues with sexual images:

“The crowd is swelling, the silence, the silence. Why is it so silent? Why is it so calm. Am I still alive? Yes I felt the pain from the pinch I gave my arm. Below me lies a a Man, a black man, an Afro American.”

Oh, how the past can foreshadow the future! Is it in her description of Malcolm’s funeral, that their son Bâri′ becomes obsessed with media companionship?

“It is now 10:00 a.m., Ossie Davis is before the microphone, the silence has fallen upon the multitude again. The click of the cameras, the hum of the the TV cameras, and yet the silence.”

Swooping back to her stillness /silence metaphor, Jo Ann cries out in anguish. The prospect of Malcolm’s message dying with Malcolm is unbearable. In great emotional pain, she demands that someone carry forth Malcolm’s dreams:

“A man, a leader, a black man, his voice is still. His ideas stilled. How much will be remembered of what he has taught his followers?” As she draws near the end of her Tribute, she shines the light on Ossie Davis, declaring Malcolm X “Our Own Black Shining Prince.” In Jo Ann’s literary reference, she passes that oh so tall order on to Malcolm’s heir – to their son Bâri′ M. Shabazz, who became known to the world as Barack Obama.

What ensued has become our American history. For Malcolm’s sake, Jo Ann has seen to it.

As you study Malcolm’s funeral memoir by Miss Jo Ann Newman of The New York Amsterdam News Classified Advertising Department, do you wonder, as did I: how ever does she know so much about Muslim tradition? How can she cite the “man of tall stature in the brown flowing robes”, and describe “the Islamic service. Imam Al Hajj Heshaans Jaaber recites four Takbeers.”

And how is no-one-special classified advertising clerk Jo Ann privy to knowing who sent what in honor of Malcolm X – referring to “many, many telegrams and letters sent from all over the world”?

How does a classified advertising clerk know the identities of the prominent people attending the funeral so intimately, that she fluidly cites them? “Ossie Davis, Ruby Dee, James Farmer, John Lewis, Bayard Rustin, Dick Gregory, Ralph Cooper.”

How can she handily identify the “Los Angeles NAACP, Chester Civil Rights Council, National Urban League, African Natl Council, Freedom Fighters of Ohio, Michigan Committee of Freedom Now, The Moors Of Haiti, Ambassador of Lagos, and many many more” as funeral attendees?

How does she know them – by name, by purpose?

How, indeed?

“Malcolm X Shabazz,” tenderly, she addresses him, in the beyond. “You have not fallen in vain. Your ideas, your ideals, your morals will be continued [my emphasis].”

Jo Ann is a girl with a plan.

She’s a girl who will put to work her traits of persistence, rebelliousness, and loyalty to Malcolm and his cause, to ensure that their son is vaulted from ‘nowhere’ to The White House.

“A heavy heart, a silent pen, my tribute to a history-making BLACK MAN” she says, in her Tribute’s conclusion. “THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE. A SALAAM ALEIKUM” – which, notably, were among Malcolm’s X’s last words to his faithful.

‘THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE” are your mother’s words of admonition, Bâri′ M. Shabazz.

Bâri′ M. Shabazz, a.k.a. “Barack Obama”.

Bâri′ M. Shabazz: you of no faith in America. America, who now must sadly discover: your mother “Stan” is a Sham.

For, Jo Ann Newman’s son did not believe that we would accept his mother, exactly as she was.

He didn’t believe we’d ever accept him either, born with a “double whammy’ of illegitmacy, and bi-racial genes.

And yet, he just had to carry forth the Dreams From His Father!

For, as you can see from her Tribute to Malcolm, the dreams are his mother’s, too.

What to do, Bâri′? How to do it?

Imagine…..Young man Bâri′, teeming with ambition, sits back. He takes a few puffs to quiet his head. Seeking guidance, he tunes into the psyche of his long-gone, genius father. His father, his mentor, his idol – savvy Malcolm X, the man who from his teens sported scores of handy aliases.

In time, his father’s spirit speaks.

“Reinvent!” Malcolm’s melodious, power-filled voice urges his eager son. ”Reinvent your lineage!”

And so, Bâri′ invents a midwestern mother, bred from good Protestant stock. That’s what America wants, does it not, in its President? A boy born of a “nice” midwestern girl? A Christian girl, to boot!

“Now find yourself a father,” Malcolm’s spirit directs him. “A father to give you what I could not – legitimacy.”

And so, Bâri′ invents a father, using his real father’s friend – Barack Obama from Kenya. A father who meets “Stanley Ann”, ingenue college freshman, in an exotic – though American! – setting.

A father who – as America loves – does the right thing, and marries his pregnant mother.

“One last masterful touch, my son,” says Malcolm. “Alter the records. The state and federal census records, to invent a geneaology. It’s a cinch these days, when everything is digital!”

So, Bâri′ busily works to make his synthetic family real “in the system”, to mislead all who research his “family-of-origin”.

Timing is everything, isn’t it, Bâri′?! Do what you need, to get to be Harvard Law Review Editor! Get that book contract before you graduate! Morph the book’s theme from a commentary on race relations in America – as stipulated in your book contract – into an “autobiography” panhandling your synthetic “family of origin”.

Put your “family” out there far enough ahead of your political entrée, and your story will become familiar!

Eventually, with enough ‘reporters’ regurgitating what you feed them, your family fabrication will ring ‘true’.

In your clever calculations, Bâri′, you made one foolish omission:

The power of Truth to out lies.

As for Jo Ann Newman, one of a zillion dark-haired, big-eyed New York girls from the fifties – hey, thought her smarty-pants, big-shot, Ivy League son, who ever would remember her?

What’s more, even if they do, enshrined in her brand new identity, who could recognize her – what with all the digital smoke and mirrors her son applied to her face? To her eyes. Her nose. Her chin. Her hair. Her cheeks. Who?

Who, huh?

You’d be surprised, Bâri′. You’d be surprised.

Writer’s Note:

America, I communicate this information with great grief – and ask that, as you discover the Truth, you receive it with compassion.

It’s not that I countenance or condone what’s been done. Far from it. I’m outraged. Hurt. Horrified.

Most importantly, I feel thoroughly betrayed by America’s media – who willfully abandoned their solemn responsibility to verify the data presented by The Obama Campaign.

But if we as a country are to come through this intact, we must rise to our moral high calling. Hateful accusations and vengeful behavior will only worsen our situation – and accomplish nothing constructive.

Please, pray for Barack Obama.
Published: November 15, 2011
Filed Under: Bari M. Shabazz, Dreams From My Father, Jo Ann Newman, Malcolm X and Stanley Ann, Obama Birth Identity, Obama Paternity, The Grand Scheme, The Malcolm X Political World View

2011-11-09T19:11:00.000-08:00

Why Was the Criminal Record of Bari Shabazz Altered Nine Years After His Alleged Death…

AND JUST BEFORE BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA RAN FOR U.S. SENATE?

by Sharon Rondeau

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

First page of incident report involving Bari Shabazz in Hawaii in 1982 which was amended to "nolle prosequi" in 2003, 21 years after his alleged death

(Nov. 9, 2011) — In a posting dated November 7, 2011, Atty. Mario Apuzzo reported that the criminal record of a Bari Shabazz, who apparently failed to appear in court following a car accident in Hawaii in 1982, was changed 21 years later to indicate that the charge of driving without a valid license would not be prosecuted and that the judgment had been “satisfied.”

Shabazz’s death is reported to have been recorded in the Social Security Administration’s database as having occurred in August 1994. Why would a prosecutor in Hawaii ask a judge to expunge a criminal record of someone who had been deceased for more than two decades? How could its validity have been contested so many years after the event which it chronicled?

It appears another change was made in 2005 to the record indicating that there was no money owed to the court in the form of fines or fees.

What motivation would a prosecutor have to raise the issue 21 years after the fact? How could a judge have even prosecuted a deceased man?

But was Shabazz dead, or simply renamed? Is Bari Shabazz’s middle initial “M”?

The Terrible Truth blog contends that Bari M. Shabazz is the original identity of Barack Hussein Obama II, that he is a fugitive from justice, and that he was born in New York City on October 28, 1959. Author Martha Trowbridge states that Shabazz’s father was Malcolm X, the black civil rights leader who had initially preached that white men were “blue-eyed devils.”

If Shabazz became Obama, was the Hawaii bench warrant nullified in 2003 because Obama planned to run for the U.S. Senate from the state of Illinois in 2004? Was Obama fearful that someone could unravel a secret past?

And was the additional altering of the record in 2005 made in preparation for Obama’s run for the White House rumored as early as 2006? Were the alterations made just in case someone perceived a connection between Shabazz and Obama?

Is there a connection?

Are there connections among Barack Obama Sr., Malcolm X, Nikita Kruschev and Fidel Castro?

Malcolm X had been known as “Detroit Red” during his youth. Did the clothing worn by the Obama family on Election Night 2008 signify a connection to that nickname? Malcolm admitted to using various identities, including “Shabazz.”

Malcolm X visited Elijah Muhammad, founder of the Nation of Islam, in Chicago after his release from prison in 1952, and Muhammad became Malcolm’s mentor. Today, Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam and rejuvenator of the Fruit of Islam, the security wing of the NOI, lives in Obama’s Chicago neighborhood. There is a connection among Farrakhan, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and Obama. Farrakhan and Wright had traveled to visit the recently-assassinated Muomaar Qaddafi of Libya in 1984. Following Qaddafi’s death, early indications were that the rebels could institute Sharia law as the foundation of an interim government.

Why did Obama choose that neighborhood to raise his young family?

Could this be why Obama has never released his school records, medical records, or any verifiable documentation about himself? Does it explain why the two images he has released as “birth certificates” were immediately labeled forgeries? Would it explain why Obama’s social security number was issued from a state in which he never resided, worked or attended school?

How did Obama accomplish election to public office without at least a certified copy of his original birth certificate? How was he deemed to be eligible for the offices he sought and free of a criminal past?

Sheriff Joe Arpaio pledged to investigate Obama’s background and recently stated that he has information which would be a “shock” to the American people. Will that shock come from the revelation of identity theft, election fraud, and a criminal past on the part of the putative president who had touted the message of “hope and change” so loudly during the 2008 presidential campaign?

Is there really no such person as Barack Hussein Obama II? Were members of the Kenyan Parliament lying when they asserted that Obama was born in their country rather than the United States? Were the African newspapers incorrect when they stated that Obama had been born in Kenya?

What about the document which Lucas Smith stated he obtained from the Coast Provincial Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya which bears the name “Barack Hussein Obama II?” Copies of the document, along with personalized letters, were mailed during the summer of 2010 to every member of the 111th Congress, yet they all state that Obama was born in Hawaii. What proof exists that he was? The hospital which Obama has identified as “the place of my birth” refuses to discuss it.

How can a person without a past become the President of the United States and command its military forces?

2011-11-08T09:20:00.000-08:00

Is Putative President Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years Following An Auto Accident in Honolulu County, Hawaii on March 12, 1982?

By Mario Apuzzo
November 7, 2011

Editor's Note" Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-putative-president-barack-hussein.html

On November 2, 2011, I published an article entitled and asking the question, “Is Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bâri′ M. Shabazz, Born October 28, 1959 in New York City? ”, accessed at
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-barack-hussein-obama-ii-really-bari.html. The basis of the question that I asked came from a November 2, 2011 breaking story published by Martha Trowbridge entitled, “Bâri′, Barry, Barack, accessed at http://terribletruth.wordpress.com/2011/11/02/bari%e2%80%b2-barry-barack/. In her article, Ms. Trowbridge’s contends that putative President Barack Hussein Obama II’s real name is Bâri′ M. Shabazz and that his date of birth is October 28, 1959, and his social security number is 084-54-5926. She says he was born in New York City. She adds that he was born with the name Bâri′ M. Shabazz. She also says that to be able to enter the political world, Bâri′ M. Shabazz had to change his birth identity and take on a new one which became Barack Hussein Obama II.

Ms. Trowbridge says: “We know this: Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.”

Ms. Trowbridge has found that the Social Security Death Index shows: “SHABAZZ, B M 28 Oct 1959 Aug 1994 (V) 34 (PE) (none specified) New York 084-54-5926.” From this, one would think that Bâri′ died in August 1994. But no, Ms. Trowbridge informs that only his identity was made “dead.” The real person continued to live and that person became “Barack Hussein Obama II.” Note how she explains that the “death” of Bâri′ was only reported by someone (“V” or “Verified”) and that the person did not present any valid death certificate (“P” or “Proof).

What’s more Ms. Trowbridge explains that “[o]nce in the federal system, the [death] record was flagged as ‘PE’, meaning that an inconsistency exists between what was reported and what was recorded in the government’s files.”

Finally, and the most shocking part of her report is that Ms. Trowbridge contends that Bâri′ M. Shabazz is the biological son of Malcolm X. Hence, if Barack Hussein Obama II is the same person as Bâri′ M. Shabazz, that would make putative President Obama the biological son of Malcolm X.

On November 4, 2011, an anonymous source emailed me something very interesting. To substantiate the content of the email, the writer directed me to go to a web site of the Judiciary for the State of Hawaii and to do a search of cases that have been disposed of by that State’s traffic courts. The anonymous source had done just that and so the person provided me with the information which that traffic court shows on its web site.

I did go to the Hawaii traffic court’s web site which is called eCourt Kokua and I was eventually able to confirm the information that the anonymous source sent me. Access to the court’s web set may be gained by going to http://jimspss1.courts.state.hi.us:8080/eCourt/ECC/ECCDisclaimer.iface;jsessionid=FDFF513AA90109AC4375A7CBE7C8AF36. Once at the site, click “Agree” to the terms and conditions. Then click, “Search for case details by case ID or citation number.” Once there, enter at the prompt, Case ID or Citation Number(*): 1193041MO and hit Search.” The following report appears:

What do these reports say and what questions does they raise? The Case ID is 1193041 MO. The name of the case is State v. Bari Shabazz which was a non-jury case. The case is characterized as a “Traffic Crime,” with a “REPORT number W50100.” The offense occurred on March 12, 1982. The charging police officer is Duane Masayuki Espinueva. The event is characterized as an “Accident Major.” The charge was driving without a valid driver’s license. The case was first filed on Tuesday, March 16, 1982, in the First Circuit, located at Kane’Ohe Division. I checked and this court is located at
45-939 Pookela Street, Kaneohe, HI 96744
. The case was continued to April 5, 1982.

The record also shows that Bari Shabazz was supposed to be arraigned and enter a plea on April 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m., in Kane’ohe Traffic Court, Courtroom B, at the Kane’ohe Division. The case was continued to May 5, 1982.

On May 5, 1982, at 8:00 a.m., Bari Shabazz was supposed to again be arraigned and enter his plea in the same court room. He apparently did not appear and so the court issued a bench warrant on May 5, 1982, bearing number “BWO 050582.” It appears as though the court set bail at $25.00. The record also shows the entry of “HONDA,” maybe meaning that Bari Shabazz was driving a Honda or that the prosecutor’s name was “HONDA.” The next entry is for May 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m. The court ordered the “AP” (maybe meaning accused person) to show proof of “NEW YORK DRIVER’S LICENSE.”

The report then shows that the prosecutor on April 9, 2003, filed an ex parte motion to recall the bench warrant and announced on the record “nolle prosequi.” This is a Latin phrase which is formally entered into a court record which means that the prosecutor in a criminal case “will no further prosecute” the case. The motion was listed as “NP [nolle prosequi] 040903.” So, the charge was dismissed upon the prosecutor’s ex parte “Nolle Prosequi” motion made on April 9, 2003. “Ex parte” means that only one side made the application which in this case was the prosecutor.

The final entry was for October 30, 2005, at 8:00 a.m., when the court noted that a $-0- balance was owed, but said “Pls check.”

This information raises the following questions:

1. Is the Bari Shabazz named in this traffic court report the same person Ms. Trowbridge calls “Bâri′ M. Shabazz” in her report and who is listed as “B M Shabazz” in the Social Security Death Index? If it is the same person, then that puts New Yorker Bâri′ M. Shabazz in Honolulu County, Hawaii, on March 12, 1982. Using a date of birth of October 28, 1959, this would have made Bâri′ M. Shabazz 22 years old at the time that he had this major automobile accident in Honolulu County.

2. The accident is characterized as a major accident. Chances are that Bari Shabazz and/or any passenger was taken to a local hospital in Honolulu County due to his/their injuries. If Bari Shabazz suffered any major injuries or laceration, the physical signs of those injuries and/or lacerations could still be present somewhere on his body if he is still alive.

3. Bari Shabazz was charged with driving without a driver’s license. The court ordered him to show proof of his New York driver’s license. Hence, Bari Shabazz must have told the charging police officer or the court that he did have a driver’s license and that it was one issued by the State of New York. Hence, Bari Shabazz must have been a resident of the State of New York. Note that Ms. Trowbridge said that Bâri′ M. Shabazz was born in New York City. Also, what was Bari Shabazz doing driving in Hawaii with what should have been a New York driver’s license? Was he now living in Hawaii? Was he there on vacation? Was he there visiting family or friends? Was he going to school there?

4. On April 9, 2003, the prosecutor filed a motion to recall the bench warrant, to terminate prosecution, and close the case. Why would this case come to the attention of some local prosecutor 21 years following the initial violation of March 12, 1982? A local prosecutor does not just go looking for cases that are 21 years old and file motions to dismiss those cases. Someone must have asked that local prosecutor to dismiss the case so that the arrest warrant was cleared from the court’s and nation’s computer system.

5. Ms. Trowbridge shows that Bâri′ M. Shabazz, according to the Social Security Death Index, died in August 1994. If Bâri′ M. Shabazz is the same person as is listed in this Hawaii auto accident as Bari Shabazz, why would someone care to recall his arrest warrant on April 9, 2003 or almost 9 years after his death? Surely, it could not be Bâri′ M. Shabazz who was interested since he had been dead since 1994. On the other hand, if he was not dead he would be interested.

6. On October 30, 2005, or 23 years following the date of the accident of March 12, 1982, the court again re-visits the case of Bari Shabazz, noting that he did not owe the court any money but to “Pls. check.” Why would the court again concern itself with this case on that date, especially if Bari Shabazz was dead since 1994?

7. So, is the Bari Shabazz named in this Hawaii traffic court report the same person Ms. Trowbridge calls “Bâri′ M. Shabazz” in her report and who is listed as “B M Shabazz” in the Social Security Death Index? That question surely merits an investigation. If he is, then that puts the New-York-born Bâri′ M. Shabazz in Honolulu County, Hawaii, the alleged birth place and once place of residence of putative President, Barack Hussein Obama II. Given what Ms. Trowbridge has concluded in her report, that is a circumstantial piece of evidence that is surely worth investigating. What also supports Ms. Trowbridge’s position that Bâri′ M. Shabazz really did not die in August 1994 and that he is still alive as Barack Hussein Obama II is that the traffic court in Hawaii was still acting on the Bari Shabazz traffic case 9 and 11 years after the alleged death in August 1994 of Bâri′ M. Shabazz. What needs to be investigated is why the local prosecutor and court took those actions so many years after the traffic accident and at whose behest.

8. Finally, when there is an auto accident, the police do a detailed accident report. That report includes the name, addresses, date of birth, and social security number of the person involved in the accident who is charged for that accident. The driver’s license number is also included if that license is produced or otherwise verified. A physical description of the defendant is also included. The make of auto, including the year made and VIN number are also included, along with statements of witnesses. There could be a photograph of the defendant in the police record. A thorough investigation of this matter would surely include searching the police record in Honolulu County for this report so that this information may be examined and evaluated.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
November 7, 2011
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
####

Copyright © 2011
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
All Rights Reserved
Posted by Puzo1 at 10:07 PM

2011-11-05T19:53:00.000-07:00

Nesting or Red-Rooster-ing, It’s Memory Lane For Obama

NATION OF ISLAM LEADER’S HOME WAS LOCATED IN OBAMA’S CHOSEN NEIGHBORHOOD

by Martha Trowbridge, ©2011, blogging at Terrible Truth

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/11/05/nesting-or-red-rooster-ing-it%e2%80%99s-memory-lane-for-obama/

(Nov. 5, 2011) — If you want to peek down Obama’s two fondest Memory Lanes, don’t look to Hawaii.

Look to Chicago, to his ‘nest’. And to Harlem, to his choice of Red Rooster Restaurant for his March 2011 DNC fundraiser.

Nesting or Red-Rooster-ing, Obama’s Memory Lanes are saturated with memories of Malcolm X.

To paraphrase a popular axiom, our nest is where our heart is. For Obama, since 2005, his nest is 5046 South Greenwood Avenue, Chicago, IL.

Though the structure is indeed stunning, 5046 South Greenwood means a lot more to Barack Obama than just grand architecture.

It’s the closest he could possibly come, to surrounding himself with memories of his beloved lost father, Malcolm X. How?

In two fundamental ways: architecture and environs.

Architecturally speaking, 5046 South Greenwood Avenue, Chicago IL is a grandiose version of the home Malcolm and his family occupied until the week before Malcolm’s death.

Obama Residence, 5046 South Greenwood Avenue, Chicago

Malcolm X Residence, 23-11 97th Street, East Elmhurst, New York

Photo taken after 14 February 1965 firebombing

Both homes are brick with a center entrance and central front dormer. Both sport a hip roof. Twin windows flank the front door. Above the front, on the second level, are two adjacent windows.

White painted window frames and sills adorn the houses.

Twin pines stand in the front yard – at both homes, the one to the right is fuller, healthier, than the one to the left.

Both homes feature a wrought iron fence.

The land to the left of both structures is wider than the land to the right; with an alley-like walkway strip to the right of the structures.

And that’s not all. The architectural style of Obama’s home is Georgian Revival. Malcolm’s father Earley [Obama’s biological grandfather] is from Reynolds, Georgia. So are Earley’s two sisters, with whom Malcolm lived in Boston in the early forties, following his mother’s institutionalization.

If style and looks are not enough to make Obama feel close to his long lost father, how about this?

His home’s environs connect Obama with the happiest years of Malcolm’s life.

Obama’s home at 5046 South Greenwood Avenue, Chicago is just a stroll away from 5335 South Greenwood Avenue, Chicago, home and headquarters of Malcolm’s spiritual advisor, The Honorable Elijah Muhammad.

5335 South Greenwood Avenue, Chicago was also, for years, the site of the annual Nation of Islam Saviour’s Day Convention – an event much cherished by Malcolm.

Oh, the memories! Malcolm, devotedly sitting at the feet of his idol, The Honorable Elijah Muhammad, studying the Muslim faith, doing his best to impress Elijah with his talent, dedication, and promise.

Oh, the memories! Malcolm happily working at creating and publishing Mr. Muhammad Speaks, there, right there, at 5335 South Greenwood Avenue, Chicago, the national headquarters of Nation Of Islam. Malcolm, a high school dropout, living the American Dream.

Oh, the memories! Malcolm, enthusiastically coming from and going to NOI Headquarters from Harlem, from any and all of the many cities to which he traveled, on behalf of NOI. Malcolm, touted by The Honorable Elijah Muhammad as NOI’s National Spokesman. [Obama’s Dad, a national figure!] Malcolm, for many years, regarded as Elijah’s favorite ‘son’ – so much so that reportedly Elijah’s sons envied Malcolm’s relationship with their father.

What memories. What family ties. What professional roots. What a place for Obama to nest. To rest his weary head.

And when Obama’s not resting, Malcolm’s history is mere moments away! By car, what with the one way traffic, it’s only .56 miles from Obama’s house to Elijah’s former home / NOI headquarters / NOI Mosque No.2.

But, as the crow flies, or the foot treads – it’s only a block and a half! A lovely stroll, at any time of year.

Perhaps, during his frequent visits to Chicago, Malcolm strolled or drove by 5046 South Greenwood? Perhaps he admired the stately home, noting its similarities with his modest East Elmhurst home.

Perhaps Malcolm mentioned 5046 South Greenwood Avenue, in conversation or in writing? To Stanley Ann, perhaps?

Perhaps it was Malcolm’s dream house.

Do you think Obama chose Chicago – or this home – lightly?

Obama’s nesting choice is not the only indicator of ‘where he comes from’ – and who he yearns for. Consider this sample page from his Power Place Playbook: his choice of fundraising venue at Harlem’s Red Rooster Restaurant, 29 March 2011. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/16/obama-red-rooster_n_836684.html

It’s classic Obama, ever in search of connectivity with his father.

Because we’ve got so many Malcolm memories around Red Rooster to explore, let’s not spend much time on the date of the Harlem fundraiser. How important can it be, that on 29 March 1964, at Harlem’s Audubon Ballroom, Malcolm first delivered perhaps his most famous speech – “The Ballot Or The Bullet”?? http://www.vlib.us/amdocs/texts/malcolmx0364.html

It can’t be that important, can it? Let’s focus on the restaurant.

Courtesy, Phillie Casablanca

http://www.flickr.com/photos/philliecasablanca/2115133604/

Red Rooster is sited at 310 Lenox Avenue – that is, at 310 Malcolm X Boulevard – between 125th and 126th Street.

If you didn’t know about his bio-psycho-emotional ties to Malcolm X, you couldn’t know how warm-and-goosey this neighborhood feels to a man like Barack.

But once you do, you’ll know how right at home he feels there. And why he chose Red Rooster.

It’s not just that its chef was the guy Obama called in to cater his first State Dinner in 2009.

It’s the ‘hood’, man. Malcolm’s ‘hood’.

Why else would New York City rename this major thoroughfare in Malcolm’s honor?

But enough digressing. We must get back to Red Rooster! After all, Obama’s heading up a power-packed DNC fundraiser luncheon. Who wants to miss it? So let’s imagine that day. Imagine yourself seated there. Perhaps you’re lucky enough to have a window seat.

If so, you’ll be able to see the famous corner of 125th and Lenox, where, in April 1957, “police intervened in a scuffle between a man and woman at 125th Street and Lenox Avenue” http://www.malcolmxbio.com/node/15. That night, Minister Malcolm stepped into power in the white world, by stepping in to successfully defend the rights of Brother Johnson Hinton [a member of Malcolm's Mosque] in a case of police brutality.

[We all remember Obama’s famous declaration about the Cambridge Police, now don’t we? He doesn’t know the facts, but he does know that “the police acted stupidly”.]

Stretch your neck to look a bit farther down Lenox, you’ll access another, earlier lesson in Malcolm X’s history. It’s Malcolm’s old hangout! The Paradise Bar at Lenox Lounge, 288 Lenox Avenue, between 124th and 125th. http://www.lenoxlounge.com/history.html Packed with memories of Malcolm, it’s where “he hangs out and begins running numbers” prior to his arrest and imprisonment. http://www.movie-locations.com/movies/m/malcolmx.html

But we must return to the luncheon, mustn’t we? Back to the restaurant. Cross 125th again, and mind your manners. You mustn’t be distracted by scenes from movies, like that powerful scene in Spike Lee’s Malcolm X. Forget about Malcolm and his followers, triumphantly marching from the police station to the hospital after Malcolm secured the release of Brother Johnson Hinton. Forget it was filmed on West 125th Street – right by the Apollo Theater! Apollo Theater, 253 West 125th Street, Malcolm’s frequent podium. The site of so much historical ‘family’ achievment for Obama. Apollo Theater – purchased after Malcolm’s death and revitalized by Malcolm’s loyal lawyer, Percy Sutton.

Honestly, with all this excitement, how could you – or Obama – eat a bite?

Good thing you didn’t follow your fancy along 125th. You’d never hear a word at the luncheon! You wouldn’t even have time to nibble the sumptuous food. For enroute to the Apollo Theater, at the corner of 125th and 7th Avenue [the next cross street over from Lenox], stands the Hotel Theresa – now the Theresa Towers.

Known as The Waldorf of Harlem, Hotel Theresa was Malcolm’s favorite hotel – so much so that it was the site of Malcolm’s headquarters for his Muslim Mosque, Inc. and Organization of African American Unity, once he split with Nation Of Islam. It’s also the hotel where Malcolm facilitated accommodations for Fidel Castro and his entourage when, in September 1960, they came to New York City to attend The United Nations General Assembly.

How downright historical!

And we all know how Obama feels about ‘historical’.

But let’s not let Obama’s obsession with ‘making history’ distract us.

Oh dear, with all our sight-seeing, the luncheon is over.

It’s 2 PM already! Obama is off to attend to the rest of his [public] New York agenda. A stop at The American Museum Of Natural History, where Malcolm “tentatively enjoys a first date with [his future wife] Betty Shabazz” http://www.movie-locations.com/movies/m/malcolmx.html#lenox

Then on to The United Nations: Malcolm X’s High Court. The body to whose attention Malcolm passionately believed America’s racial injustices should be brought forth – and punished.

Only the driver and Secret Service know what Obama emoted that fine March 2011 day. Did Malcolm’s son weep tears of joy, as he cruised that sweeping avenue – Lenox Avenue when Malcolm cruised it, which now bears his name as well? From his stately limo, did Obama drink in the sights and sounds, imagining his father behind a wheel, or striding along a sidewalk, or standing on a corner, rousingly speaking to crowds?

Enroute or after lunch, did The Presidential Entourage cruise past Marcus Garvey Memorial Park, just one block over from Red Rooster? Obama’s paternal grandparents, Earl and Louise Little, met and fell in love at a Garvey event.

Did they dare cruise by the site of much glory – and such tragedy – for Malcolm: the Audubon Ballroom?

Malcolm, Malcolm, everywhere! Making it oh so easy for Barack to connect with his beloved, long lost father.

A day doesn’t get any better than this, does it, for the son who carries forth Dreams From His Father? What stirrings, what self-pride Obama must have felt, driven along the streets of New York City, protected, esteemed, pampered, in great pomp and circumstance.

“Hey, Dad,” I hear Obama silently say, from deep in the belly of The Beast. “Are you proud of me yet?”

Once you understand where Barack Obama really comes from, Truth is, he is the most transparent President in American History. In his behavior, The Boy Who Would Be Wanted [And Loved And Valued] by his father is tragically transparent.

—————-

For those of you who are literary buffs – as is Obama – don’t miss the symbolic power of the restaurant name!

Red: socialism; communism; Malcolm’s call to bloody revolution by blacks in America

Rooster: an evocative echoing of another of Malcolm’s ever-living statements: “It’s a case of the chickens coming home to roost.” This public statement on President John F. Kennedy’s assassination cost him his cherished professional position in Nation Of Islam.

2011-11-05T17:24:00.000-07:00

Have Public Records on Bari M. Shabazz Been Altered in the Last Three Days?

AKA BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA?

by Sharon Rondeau

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

East Elmhurst is located in the borough of Queens, NY. Malcolm X reportedly lived there from 1959-1965, when he was assassinated.

(Nov. 5, 2011) —Recently The Post & Email published a “Blog of the Day” entry which posited that the black activist known as “Malcolm X” is the biological father of the man known as Barack Hussein Obama II. We followed up with our own research to promote additional probing by members of the public.

Today The Post & Email was contacted by a reader who communicated the following:

After reading the Martha Trowbridge article about Bari M. Shabazz today, I placed an order to the Social Security Admin for a certified copy of Bari Shabazz’s SS-5 form (application for SSN). Application Name: eFOIA Requests, and my Transaction Date is Nov 4, 2011 7:33:49 PM.

I am instructed by the SSA that unless unusual or exceptional circumstances are present, I should receive a response within 20 business days. I will scan the documents when I receive them, and send you copies by e-mail. The documents should include a certified statement from SSA, the SS-5 form, and a numident, which is a computer printout showing the CYD (Cycle date, the date the SSN record was established or corrected).

The SS-5 form should have the following information:

SSN, Name to be used in work or business, full name given at birth, date of birth, place of birth, age, sex, color or race, father’s full name, mother’s maiden name, if applicant ever before applied for social security, railroad or tax account number, mailing address, the date of application, phone number, signature, and the RFN number (an 11-digit record control number).

Trowbridge had reported in her article that “Barí M. Shabazz” had been reported deceased in August 1994. Barack Hussein Obama II officially entered the world of politics in 1996. He was active as a “community organizer” after graduating from Harvard Law School.

During his lifetime, Malcolm X was known by several different names. Born Malcolm Little, he changed his last name to an “X” to signify the last name which had been allegedly “stolen” while his forefathers were kept in slavery. Obama has been known as Barack Hussein Obama II; Barack Hussein Obama Jr.; Barry Soetoro, and possibly Bari M. Shabazz. Other possible aliases include Harrison J. Bounel and Barak Mounir Ubayd. Obama’s life story and parentage have been “called into question.”

Malcolm X converted to Islam while in prison for burglary. Considered “intelligent and articulate” as well as “eloquent,” he became a national spokesman for the Nation of Islam organization, which promoted black nationalism combined with “traditional Islam.”

At one time, Malcolm had wanted to become a lawyer. Obama became a lawyer but “voluntarily retired” his license during the 2008 presidential campaign.

Malcolm X had described the assassination of John F. Kennedy as “the chickens coming home to roost,” a phrase also uttered by Barack Hussein Obama’s pastor of 20 years, Rev. Jeremiah Wright during the 2008 presidential campaign. Wright preached Black Liberation Theology at the Trinity United Church of Christ (TUCC) until his retirement in 2008, the same year as the presidential election. Malcolm X was “silenced” by Nation of Islam leader, Elijah Mohammad following his comments on Kennedy. Malcolm X believed that Kennedy had not kept his promises to the black community on which he had campaigned and that he had “paid off” black leaders “so that they are silent.”

It is reported that Malcolm X’s “politics” became more important than his religion. He was considered a “charismatic and powerful speaker.” If Obama is Malcolm’s son, did he wish to “complete what his father had started in the political world,” beginning in 1994?

At approximately 3:30 p.m. EDT on November 5, 2011, The Post & Email was provided with information stating that “public records” pertaining to Bari M. Shabazz have been altered to show that he is still alive and living in East Elmhurst, NY, rather than dead, as recently reported in Trowbridge’s post.

Will the reader who sent the FOIA request receive correct and unaltered information? Will he or she be told that the person possessing that social security number is still alive and therefore the information cannot be released?

2011-11-02T21:53:00.000-07:00

Bâri′, Barry, Barack
by Martha Trowbridge

Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge. All Rights Reserved.

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

White House Press Corps: may I inquire? Were any of you invited to the birthday party Friday?

If not, don’t feel miffed.

After all, it’s long been a family secret.

Anyway, here’s the scoop: Friday was Bâri′’s birthday.

Bâri′ M. Shabazz - Barack Obama’s identity at birth.

Yes, 28 October was the day, in 1959, in New York City, that the man who presents himself as Barack Hussein Obama was born Bâri′ M. Shabazz.

A baby thrice bestowed with names sacred to Malcolm X: Bâri′, Malik, and Shabazz.

Oh so happily bestowed by his mother, who truly-and-forever loved Malcolm.

It wasn’t just the sacred nature of these names that so delighted his proud parents.

It was what the names signified.

Bâri′ - Muslim name meaning “Of Allah”. According to Islam, God as al-Bâri′ is the creator of all: http://www.harunyahya.com/isim_sunum/bari.html “al-Bâri′: The Maker, The Producer, The Evolver, The Maker From Nothing … Bâri′ denotes the way the One [my emphasis] works with substances, often creating from existing matter, making and evolving that which is free and clear of any other thing, free and clear of imperfections.” http://wahiduddin.net/words/99_pages/bari_12.htm

Note the reference to “The One”, a popular attribution to Barack Obama during the campaign.

Malik / Malachi – Names most sacred to Malcolm. “Lord”, “Master”, ‘Sovereign”, “King” … Malik is Arabic for Malachi [Messenger of God]. In 1952, Malcolm requested permission from The Honorable Elijah Muhammad [his Nation Of Islam spiritual director] to assume the name Malachi Shabazz – approval that was denied him. In spring 1964, after Malcolm left Nation Of Islam, he assumed the identity El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/08/books/malcolm-x-a-life-of-reinvention-by-manning-marable-review.html?pagewanted=all

Shabazz - Malcolm’s chosen Muslim last name. It’s the Muslim name his wife Betty also chose. The name they bestowed upon all six children.

Among the Malcolm X aliases certified by the F.B.I. are Malachi Shabazz, Malcolm Shabazz and Malik El-Shabazz.

Bâri′, Barry, Barack ….. Sort of has a cadence to it, doesn’t it? Reminds me of the days I studied Greek and Latin. Studied the conjugation of verbs. Bâri′, Barry, Barack. His past [imperfect] tense, his present tense, his future tense.

Bâri′, Barry, Barack: he was, he is, he will be.

So it was for high school Barry. His past collides with his future. Barry, discovering his birth certificate amongst sequestered documents. Discovering his Muslim identity – and the name of his biological father.

And in that discovery, recognizing “I occupied the space where their [his parents’] dreams had been”. A stunning realization.

A future must be created!

Politics, yes, this is the proper path. National politics.

The very same path that daddy Malcolm had his yearning eye upon.

His son would go one better, though. His eye would firmly fix upon The White House!

But wait. Who would elect to The United States Presidency the illegitimate son of a black, Muslim revolutionary? A man who advocated overthrow of The United States Government? Who openly spoke of his hatred of whites?

His past as Bâri′ would never do.

Not to worry! Bâri′ is destined for great things. His genes, his birth names said so. He will create an identity “free and clear” of Malcolm’s political liabilities.

A ‘tweak’ of his name’s second syllable, and voilá! Bâri′ and Barry become “Barack”.

The synthetic ”son” of Malcolm’s African friend, Kenyan exchange student Barack Obama.

The synthetic ”grandson” of Malcolm’s hero.

[For those of you unfamiliar, Barack Obama was the son of Mau Mau Kenyan Revolution Hero, Hussein Onyango Obama. In the early 1950's, Malcolm was publicly singing HOO's praises in Harlem - years before his son, Barack Obama, arrived in America.]

And so, a future was created.

An identity was born: “Barack Obama II” – a.k.a. “Barack Obama Jr. “

Such creative genius! A simple ‘tweak’, and Bâri′ M. Shabazz gets his new identity – and an unencumbered, bright political future!

With a birth narrative boasting exotic, tropical settings, to boot!

But back to young Bâri′, shall we? After all, it is his birthday we’re discussing.

And back to Barry.

How much closer in sound can two names get?

Perhaps you recall Michelle Obama’s statement during the campaign, when asked about Barack’s nickname, Barry? She stated that its origin was a cute Muslim name, anglicized to “Barry”. If you don’t recall her statement, please, don’t waste your time looking for it online. The clip was long ago scrubbed.

Perhaps you recall that at Occidental College – coincident with his grand political plan to fulfill Malcolm’s Dreams – “Barack Obama” insisted that “Barry” be ditched for Barack? A brilliant strategic move indeed. Barry sounds far too close to Bâri′. What if somebody, anybody, from his past, or from the present, or worst of all, in the future, caught on?

But oh, how Truth endures. Thank goodness, amidst all the deceit, the words of half-sister Maya expose it: around the house, she stated, we called him “Bar”.

Bâri′, Barry, Barack ….. Now, who is who, and what is what? “Barack Obama”, we all know. “Barry Soetoro”, ditto. But what do we know of Bâri′ M. Shabazz?

We know this: Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.

[Wait. Wasn't there discussion of an SSN issued earlier than 1977? Sometime around the summer "Barack Obama" was 14? Let's see. Summer 1974 minus October 1959 equals ... yes, that's right, 14. Hmmm.]

But let’s not let “Barack Obama” distract us again. Back to his past [imperfect] tense.

Quite naturally, you may wonder, as did I: whatever happened to sweet baby Bâri′?

I’ve got tragic news to report, on this All Souls Day: in August 1994, at the prime-of-life age of 34, five years younger than was his father Malcolm at his untimely death, Bâri′ M. Shabazz was reported to have died.

From the Social Security Death Index database:

SHABAZZ, B M 28 Oct 1959 Aug 1994 (V) 34 (PE) (none specified) New York 084-54-5926

Hmmm ….. August 1994: Bâri′ M. Shabazz has passed on.

Oh dear. Whatever will become of all those Dreams Bâri′ was conceived to carry forth?

Not to worry. He didn’t really die. His birth identity ‘had’ to die.

Why?

Let’s see. 1994. 1994. Oh! That’s right! On 21 August 1994, the Illinois State Senate seat ‘officially’ opened up! Its occupant, Alice Palmer – for whom “Barack Obama” was working – could now set her sights on indicted Mel Reynolds’ Congressional seat.

“Barack Obama” was prepping to step out as a political candidate!!

“Congressman Mel Reynolds, the Democrat convicted of 12 charges, including sex with 16-year-old Beverly Heard and asking her to take pornographic photographs of a 15-year old, was indicted on August 21, 1994.”

http://newsbusters.org/node/8110#ixzz1OM9ilHH9

What with his prodigious plans, “Barack Obama” certainly couldn’t risk having Bâri′ M. Shabazz walking around, now, could he?!

A simple report was all that was needed.

The SSDI record states that the death information for Bâri′ M. Shabazz was coded “V”.

V signifies: “Verified: Report verified with a family member or someone acting on behalf of a family member.”

The report is not coded “P“.

P signifies: “(Proof): Death Certificate Observed”.

This distinction is critical. Notice of death was made by an informant who did not present verification of his/her reporting, that is, no death certificate was presented with the notification of death.

“SSA receives reports of death from a variety of sources, including friends and relatives of deceased individuals, funeral homes, postal authorities, financial institutions, and Federal and State agencies. Friends, relatives, and funeral homes report about 90 percent of deaths. Postal authorities and financial institutions report another 5 percent of deaths.”

Once in the federal system, the record was flagged as ‘PE’, meaning that an inconsistency exists between what was reported and what was recorded in the government’s files.

Oooops.

Complications.

And now, since you’ve had the forbearance to read along this far, I offer you comic relief.

The first listed address for Bâri′ M. Shabazz is: guess where?

One street over from Malcolm X’s house!

From baby’s conception in 1959 through shortly before Malcolm’s death in 1965, Malcolm lived just one street over from Bâri′ M. Shabazz’s first address in East Elmhurst, New York.

The first address listed for Bâri′ M. Shabazz is 32-26 98th Street, Apt.1, East Elmhurst, New York.

Malcolm’s 1959 address was 25-46 99th Street, East Elmhurst, New York.

Malcolm and his family resided at 23-11 97th St. East Elmhurst, New York, from July 1960 through February 18, 1965, three days before his death.

BM Shabazz (Bari M Shabazz)

B 10/28/59
D 8/94
SSN 084545926

Residences
Street Address City Name on phone Phone #

1 3226 98TH ST APT 1 EAST ELMHURST, NY 11369

2 32 98 EAST ELMHURST, NY 11369

3 HQCO SUC BN QUANTICO, VA

4 1 HQ CO MCDEC QUANTICO, VA

5 HQ CO SERV BN QUANTICO, VA

6 99999 MILITARY APT QUANTICO, VA 22134

7 HQCO HQSVCBN MCDEC QUANTICO, VA 22134

8 HQCO SERV BN QUANTICO, VA

9 99999 MILITARY APT QUANTICO, VA 22134

Source: Intellius.

Speaking of addresses, don’t you love poor ‘dead’ Bâri′s Virginia addresses?! Fake military addresses – that’ll fool the snoops, eh! Military addresses clearly ‘created’ by someone who didn’t know diddly about the military.

My, how we’ve digressed! I wonder how the birthday party went. White House Press Corp, please, tell me: Was there a cake? With 52 gleaming candles? In their private quarters, sequestered safely away from The Secret Service, did any of you happen to hear “The Obamas” sing Happy Birthday?

2 November 2011, The Commemoration Of All Souls
Published: November 2, 2011
Filed Under: Dreams From My Father, Malcolm X and Stanley Ann, Obama Paternity, The Grand Scheme
Tags: Alice Palmer : All Souls Day : Barack Obama : Bari M. Shabazz : Illinois State Senate : Malcolm X : Martha Trowbridge : Mel Reynolds : Obama birth certificate : Obama birth identity : Obama paternity : politics : SSDI : Stanley Ann Dunham : Terrible Truth : Truth : White House Press Corps

2011-10-30T19:08:00.000-07:00

“Malcolm X’s Missing Eyeglasses”
Another Cold Case File, Closed:

“HE DOESN’T EVEN NEED THEM WHEN HE’S AWAKE”

by Martha Trowbridge, ©2011, blogging at Terrible Truth. Research Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge and Erik Rush. All Rights Reserved.

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/10/29/another-cold-case-file-closed-%e2%80%9cmalcolm-x%e2%80%99s-missing-eyeglasses%e2%80%9d/

(Oct. 29, 2011) — Mystery meets [Medical] History today, as a cold case is solved.

First, the historical medical marvel.

Barack Obama, who according to official medical reports has 20/20 vision, apparently needs eyeglasses.

Not just any eyeglasses, mind you. And certainly not when he’s in public.

He doesn’t even need them when he’s awake.

Obama needs these eyeglasses when he’s sleeping!

White House Photo

Oh dear, what have we here?

Could it be?

Could Obama be wearing Malcolm X’s eyeglasses - broken left arm and all?

Must be that Obama’s channeling dreams. Channeling Dreams From His Father.

Which leads us to the mystery:

How on earth could Obama get his hands on Malcolm’s eyeglasses?

Hmmm.

Maybe, just maybe, mama Stanley Ann got her hands on them, shortly after Malcolm was shot – and eventually passed them on to their son.

For, Truth Be Told, when Malcolm was shot at the Audubon Ballroom, 21 February 1965, as usual, he was wearing his eyeglasses.

Yet when he was wheeled out, his eyeglasses were off.

Then -

No eyeglasses on Malcolm’s body at the wake.

No eyeglasses at the funeral.

Whatever happened to Malcolm X’s eyeglasses?

Now that we have the White House photo, above, it may not be a mystery after all.

Picture the scene of the crime. The audience has fled. Malcolm has just been taken out by the medical emergency crew. His wife and children have been whisked away. And where is Stanley Ann, his long-time lover? Stanley Ann, teenage lover, sitting in that front row to the right. Stanley Ann, jumping up in shock and horror. Stanley Ann, watching the attempts to save Malcolm, watching as the medics work on him, watching as he is wheeled forever away.

What is she feeling?

In her great grief and shock, what is she thinking?

Study the assassination crime scene photo, taken much later, below.

No eyeglasses.

February 1965 Audubon Ballroom Crime Scene Photo by Stanley Wolfson

Think.

Malcolm has been wheeled away. Teenage lover Stanley Ann is unable to follow Malcolm to the hospital – what with his wife Betty and the press heading over there. Distraught, she stays behind. How can she bear it? She looks to the stage. Her lover’s jacket lies folded atop the drum riser. His shirt lies on the floor. The chair against which he fell when shot, is tipped on its back.

And there, amidst the hideous chaos, are his eyeglasses. His precious, signature, tragically broken eyeglasses.

Perhaps they too lie on the floor, tossed aside, the left arm snapped as it was torn off by the medics – or inadvertently crushed, in the chaos.

Or perhaps someone has reverently placed them – frame plus broken arm – on the drum riser, next to his jacket.

Most everyone is gone. The stage is deserted.

Stricken with pain, and anger, and grief, Stanley Ann steps up onto the stage. Quickly, she fetches the eyeglasses, along with their broken arm. Hiding them in a pocket or handbag, she hurries away.

Malcolm X’s Missing Eyeglasses Cold Case: solved.

Attorney Mario Apuzzo, when viewing this photo of Obama sleeping on the White House sofa, made a brilliant observation. These eyeglasses could have Malcolm’s DNA.

So you see, it’s all very simple. A quick swab of a Q-tip on the roof of Obama’s mouth … paternity controversy over.

2011-10-27T21:09:00.000-07:00

Saps, Stool Pigeons And Stanley Ann’s Hair

by Martha Trowbridge, blogging at Terrible Truth Research Copyright © 2011 Martha Trowbridge & Erik Rush. All Rights Reserved.

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Original post with graphics: http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/10/23/saps-stool-pigeons-and-stanley-ann%e2%80%99s-hair/

(Oct. 23, 2011) — If David Brooks at The New York Times feels he was taken for a ‘sap’ by Barack Obama, we shudder to think how everyday Americans will feel, once they find out the Truth.

Obama’s Mother And Son photo was falsified to deceive us.

Courtesy, The Obama Campaign

Recognize it? Yes, that’s the same photo as was used on the cover of Janny Scott’s A Singular Woman, her biography of Stanley Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother.

It’s the same photo Obama used in his Obamacare television ad.

So what’s the big deal? In a moment, we’ll tell you. For now, all you need to understand is this:

The photo was falsified to deceive us.

Truth is, mama Stanley Ann didn’t have long hair when Barack was young. Until, of course, with photoshop-type tampering, The Obama Campaign made sure we’d think that she did.

Here’s a peek into Truth. All that darkness, making us think we’re seeing long hair, is nothing but graphics illusion:

Another reality-check:

As if the deceit with her hair weren’t insulting enough, in the view below, note the futzing with the corner of her mouth, in order to widen it. See the [pink] added tooth. Look closely, you’ll see her original top lip line, curving down to the last white tooth – and the fake new lip lines, extending past the fake, pointy, pink tooth … And while you’re looking, don’t miss the fake ‘closed’ eyelid applied to her open eye.

Her nose, we’ll leave for another discussion.

Hey, David Brooks: you’re in sap good company.

Now, you may be wondering: why does it matter, whether mama’s hair was short or long? Whether her mouth was narrow or wide? Or why her eyes seem always half-closed, and hidden?

Here’s why: Obama was worried you’d find her in places, at key strategic times, with people he couldn’t let you know about.

People like Malcolm X. Times like the early and mid-1960′s. Places like New York City.

For instance – what if you saw this image? The image of his mother, Stanley Ann, in February 1965, at the wake / funeral of militant black leader, Malcolm X?

What if you recognized her?

Obama sure as heck wouldn’t want you to view the video in which her image resides:

“Eyewitness To The Assassination”

(Please refer to original blog posting for video)

Why not? Because though he claims his mother was thousands of miles away in Hawaii, the fact is, there Stanley Ann was in New York City, February 1965, there, right there, at Malcolm X’s wake and funeral.

So it just may be that Barack Obama’s father isn’t Barack Obama “Sr”, after all.

The Truth lies in the long and short of it. Of Stanley Ann’s Hair, that is.

Take a moment to view the video again. As you do, note Stanley Ann’s “habit of tilting her head to one side” as documented in The Telegraph article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/8534532/Barack-Obamas-mother-the-hidden-influence-on-the-American-president.html

While you’re watching, see if you can’t recognize Stanley Ann’s boyish-looking appearance, and her weight struggle, as noted by Tribune national correspondent Tim Jones: [http://www.courant.com/technology/chi-0703270151mar27-archive,0,6704277.story ] “Boyish-looking, Stanley Ann … didn’t like her nose, she worried about her weight”.

If you need extra confirmation, take a few moments and study these two youthful photos of Stanley Ann, also released by The Obama Campaign.

In the first image, though her eyelids have also been altered [pulled down, with the skin above them highlighted], her lips extended, and her chin sharpened into a point, take note of the basic shape of her face, her nose and her ears. And don’t miss those eyes, those big, dark, penetrating eyes – which, by the way, also have been altered.

Courtesy, The Obama Campaign

The next photo depicts her mouth more accurately – once you get beyond the tampering that’s been done to her lips [and to her eyes, and big-time to her nose]:

Courtesy, The Obama Campaign

Honestly, have you ever seen a girl with two such mismatched eyes?!

Try as The Obama Campaign did to occlude it, Truth will out, won’t it? From the “Eyewitness To The Assassination” video: witness Stanley Ann’s grin:

From the Campaign’s own photo, posted above, excusing the efforts to widen her mouth, here’s that same grin:

Hmmm.

Did you ever wonder why The Obama Campaign never issued video footage of his mother? The eyewitness video tells it all: Obama’s mother’s mannerisms and facial tics, as well as the way she moves her mouth, are distinctive, easily recognizable in this Malcolm X funeral footage.

Oh dear. There’s only so much a Campaign can control.

If you’re not yet fed up, and can stand it, study mama’s hairline in official photos. The ‘widow’s peak’ dip on her forehead, to the right of her nose. The idiosyncratic ‘quarter moon’ curve demonstrated in her hairline profile – which by the way can be verified by The Obama Campaign’s official Mother And Son photo, above.

At first, you may not recognize Stanley Ann, with her hair cropped close. Not to worry. After all, The Obama Campaign has spent more than four years convincing us that she had long hair.

Don’t let the image-changers’ drooping her eyelids, or layering false hair, or reshaping her nose and mouth and chin, or casting false shadows or light fool you. The Truth is in her false hair. And in her eyes – her big, dark, penetrating eyes.

Hey, Time magazine: Are “We All Saps” yet?

In closing, think about this: in the “Eyewitness To The Assassination” video, Stanley Ann, standing beside the speaker, is traumatized. Why?

Because her lover, her idol, the father of her son Barack – Malcolm X – had just been assassinated.

Still don’t believe it’s she? You don’t have to take our word for it.

Malcolm X scholar Manning Marable, in his April 2011 biography, states that Malcolm’s “teenage lover” was seated in the front row at the time of the shooting. The eyewitness in the video states that he was in the front row. In this footage, mama Stanley Ann stands comfortably at this man’s side.

To make the story steamier: Marable further states that Malcolm’s “teenage lover” had been having an affair with one of his entourage [guards, assistants, etc.] This speaker could be the man to whom Marable refers.

America is starved for answers, ravenous for Truth. America, where the media is more afraid of printing Truth than they are of printing lies.

Why?

And why would Obama hide his origins?

Because having a biological father like Malcolm X – a radical black nationalist – would have impeded Obama’s chance for election.

Still not convinced that’s Stanley Ann at Malcolm’s wake? Then answer this: in family photos for a Presidential Campaign, why would a candidate release tampered images of his mother?

Can you give us one solid reason?

And oh, all ye defenders of darkness – in case you’re thinking of flaunting the Riverhead Books version of the Mother And Son photo – the one with the background tastefully tinted grass-green behind her neck, to hide the Truth about her hair – you needn’t bother. We know all about it.

——————————

Editor’s Note: When we asked the writer, Martha Trowbridge, how she knew that the photo of the woman with very short hair and straight nose was Stanley Ann Dunham, she replied:

The photo is a frame from the video that is embedded. It was filmed during the wake ‘ funeral period of Malcolm X.

ALL the photos of Stanley Ann Dunham have been falsified via a Photoshop-type graphics program. It appears that a prototype of her was created, though when I analyzed photos from various years, the consistency was not maintained.

I’m happy to send you samples of this additional analysis. Not only has false long hair been applied to her ‘image’, her eyes have been reduced in size, and her nose, chin and mouth changed.

So of course, the question is – why?

The answer: Obama knows there are images of his mother ‘out there’ in the presence of Malcolm X. So, if he consistently put out an image that disguised her actual appearance, most people would not recognize her.And it’s worked until recently. When you have the time and energy to read through that first post,you will find links to articles describing her actual physical appearance and mannerisms – validating that indeed the girl in the video – and the frame – matches the text describing her. One fact reported was how much she hated her nose!

Even the Obots, reading the Saps post, acknowledged that the photos of her were photoshopped! The only counter they immediately had was: it’s a boy.

And it seems they haven’t had much to say since.

Last week an Obot posted something oppositional to my data. In it s/he referred to the difference in distance between eyes, from nose to mouth, etc. in the images presented by The Obama Campaign, and the video image. I responded, stating that it was interesting that the poster knew EXACTLY what changes had been made to her actual appearance.

And guess what? End of discussion by the Obot.

2011-10-22T19:25:00.000-07:00

JustiaGate

WHO SCRUBBED MATERIAL DEFINING “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN” DURING THE 2008 CAMPAIGN?

by Dianna Cotter, reporting at The Examiner

(Oct. 22, 2011) — Someone was incredibly busy in June 2008 working on an illegal front invisible to the public; searching and altering Supreme Court Cases published at Justia.com which cite the only case in American history – Minor v. Happersett (1875) – to directly construe Article 2 Section 1′s natural-born citizen clause in determining a citizenship issue as part of its holding and precedent. In this unanimous decision, the Supreme Court defined a “native or natural-born citizen” as a person born in the US to parents who were citizens; a definition which excludes from eligibility both Barack Obama and John McCain.

In June 2008 no one was discussing Minor v. Happersett 88 US 162 (1875) with regard to Obama. In fact, those who were discussing the then Senator’s citizenship status had focused instead on his birth in Hawaii in a attempt to prove the future president was not born in the United States despite publication of the Senator’s short form computer generated Birth Certificate. It would not be until October of 2008 that Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility would be questioned as to his status as a dual citizen at the time of his birth.

The Supreme Court of the United States

Meanwhile, at the “Supreme Court Center” of the influential legal research website Justia.com, efforts were underway corrupting at least 25 Supreme Court cases by erasing references to the words “Minor V. Happersett” along with references to other relevant cases on the issue along with the insertion of misleading numerical citations. And In two documented cases actual text was removed.

Clearly this was done in these specific cases in order to prevent their being found by internet researchers long before anyone had even begun to look for them, even before Obama would win the Democratic Nomination at the DNC Convention in Denver, Colorado in August ’08. This is premeditation and intent to deceive.

So far, 25 corrupted SCOTUS have been identified, and this number may continue to rise as the scope of the tampering becomes apparent. These cases all relied upon Minor, some specifically referencing its definition of Natural Born Citizen – a definition which makes Obama ineligible to be President as that definition is part of the holding and continuing precedent, issued from the highest court in our nation making it the law of the land, even now.

The most extreme sabotage so far discovered appears to have been done to the landmark decision United States v. Wong Kim Ark which was sabotaged to remove “Minor v. Happersett” three times, along with one reference to “Scott v Sandford”, another to the Slaughterhouse Cases and some accompanying text relevant to the issue. These surgical alterations would alter and shape the national dialogue; leaving a persistent and incorrect interpretation of the meaning of the ‘natural born citizen’ clause. There is no doubt whatsoever that this was the specific intent of those responsible for this illegal editing of American history and law.

As previously mentioned, the specific distinction between Citizen and Natural Born Citizen made in Minor v. Happersett is in the holding of the case, the section which creates the Law, and it is this Law which has been repeatedly cited over the decades since. In order to minimize the importance of Minor, someone at Justia deliberately decided to make these supporting citations as difficult as possible to find.

This has had the desired effect, diluting the importance of Minor v. Happersett in the national dialogue across the blogosphere’s political spectrum ever since. The end result: the one case which defines Natural Born Citizen was reduced to seeming irrelevance, and thus the conversation never got past doorkeepers already in Obama’s camp in the mainstream media.

Of course, a lawyer going into Court would never rely upon anything but an official source for Supreme Court law, but 99.9% of the population have no access to dusty law texts, or expensive legal research services such as Lexis and Westlaw. Those who committed these crimes were well aware of this, and used it to their advantage.

The manipulation at Justia.com diluted the importance of Minor by killing the citations in Supreme Court cases spanning over 100 years. Since Google most often returns Justia.com’s version of the case being searched for as the first or second hit, Justia’s version of Supreme Court opinions are most influential in the blogosphere’s forums and comments. Erasing those citations and text on the internet literally erases the importance of Minor and its precedents to millions of Americans otherwise unlikely to ever step into physical Law Library.

This is nothing short of appalling. Justia swapped their tampered versions of the cases for the actual Supreme Court opinions and then pawned them off as if the tampered versions contained the “Full Text” of the Supreme Court’s opinions. Yet Justia CEO Tim Stanley claims that making case law available to the public for free is the mission of Justia. In reality, Justia has been re-inventing our legal history and passing it off as genuine.

Attorney Donofrio’s Full report “Justia.com Surgically Removed “Minor v Happersett” from 25 Supreme Court Opinions in run up to ’08 Election”, published today explains that exposure to criminal punishment is a direct result of not just the tampering, but more specifically, as a result of placing text on every tampered page which states, “Full text of case”:

Regardless of who you supported in 2008, or whether you agree with the assertion of Minor’s relevance, every American should be outraged that 25 Supreme Court cases were surgically sabotaged and then passed off to the public as if the tampered versions contained the “Full Text of Case”. This is the very definition of “Orwellian” fascism. It’s propaganda. And there is no place for it in the United States. The sacrifices for truth and justice which created and have sustained this nation are wantonly debased by the subversive deception emanating from Justia.com servers. – Leo Donofrio Esq.

Clearly, the corruption of Supreme Court Cases was systemic and surgically targeted within Justia.com, one of the largest and best known legal research sites on the internet. Justia is nothing if not efficient in driving traffic to its site; this is after all their business. Today they partner with Google and have Google Analytics within their site which does two things; it increases Justia’s visibility on Google searches, and it pushes their website to the top of those searches done on legal issues. When specific search terms are erased out of a document, naturally that document will not appear on a search. Anyone searching for the case name “Minor v. Happersett” and “citizenship” would never see the dozens of cases manipulated by Justia.com.

Justia founder Tim Stanley has for years prided himself and his companies on principles of ‘freedom of information’. On June 19th, 2008, Stanley addressed the Legislative Council Committee at the Oregon State Legislature with the following statements:

“Our goal is to provide academic researchers, government officials, attorneys, and the public with advanced features, including full‐text search, annotations by legal professionals, and comparison tools to visualize the differences in the law between the individual states…”

And

“In the end, we both recognize the importance of providing the public with online access to our nation’s laws because such actions promote understanding, participation in and respect for our democratic institutions and legal system.”

To describe these comments, made at roughly the same time Supreme Court Cases were being scrubbed and deliberately altered at his site as ironic, is an understatement of gross proportions.

Only a person thoroughly educated in the law would know precisely which cases to look for in order to direct the changes to be made to those cases. Furthermore, only someone with access to Justia.com’s database could physically make these changes from inside the website. This artificially created a near empty result set and the cases which did turn up led those inexperienced in the law, nowhere.

This appears to violate every principle Tim Stanley and Justia.com have built their business upon.

The manipulations at Justia.com were initially discovered by Attorney Leo Donofrio on July 1, 2011, when he published his initial report, “Justia.com Caught Red Handed Hiding References to Minor v. Happersett In Published US Supreme Court Decisions,”. Upon publication of his original discovery documenting the sabotage of Boyd v. Nebraska, and Pope v. Williams, two Supreme Court cases which cite to Minor v. Happersett as precedent on citizenship, two things happened almost immediately: First, the altered pages were returned to their original versions at Justia within an hour or so of Donofrio’s publication. Second, despite Justia CEO Tim Stanley’s cries for freedom of legal information (and law suits compelling the same), robots have now been placed on the Justia URL’s for the Boyd and Pope cases at InternetArchive.org, also known as the Waybackmachine. These robots make it impossible to see the tampering as it unfolded in mid-2008… with those cases.

So much for freedom of information.

One can, however, still see the tampering from screenshots taken by Donofrio and are attached to that original report on July 1, 2011 at his blog, Natural Born Citizen, which has been singularly focused on the issue of Presidential eligibility since late 2008.

As Donofrio documents in his article today, when he discovered a third tampered case, instead of rushing to publish it, he contacted a number of other bloggers and reporters to help document the evidence before Justia dispersed their robots to block it. While Donofrio originally only discovered two cases of tampering, somebody at Justia knew where the bones were buried and went about reinstating “Minor v. Happersett” in the at least 25 cases which it had earlier sabotaged. It appears that whoever knew about these additional despoiled cases, must have believed by fixing them before the corruption was exposed no one would ever suspect they too had been altered.

What tipped Donofrio off last week to the extent of Justia’s tampering was the case “Luria v. United States”. This case also firmly supports Minor on citizenship, and he double checked the text to see if it included references to Minor. It did… something he had not noticed upon previous readings of the case at Justia.com.

With his new insight into SCOTUS case tampering, he plugged the URL into the Waybackmachine to see if it had been altered in the past. Bingo. It had. Furthermore there was nothing blocking his ability to see those snapshotted pages, and how they had been altered compared to the original text. The gun wasn’t just smoking, the bullet was still flying.

A brief explanation of the how the Waybackmachine works. It takes snapshots of internet pages. It may not record the day a given webpage changed, but it documents the changes when it does hit that page. Thus a date on the Waybackmachine of April 13, 2004 means this was the date the snapshot was taken, not when the changes were necessarily made. There is no way of knowing precisely when the change occurred as the waybackmachine does not record the precise instant the change is made, it is only sometime later when the Internet archive records it.

The evidence he discovered there, at the time of publication of this article, is still available and shows the same exact same pattern of behavior – deception – that Justia exhibited with the Boyd and Pope cases Donofrio published back in July.

If Justia hasn’t blocked access to the WaybackMachine for their publication of Luria v. US, 231 U.S. 9 (1913) by the time you read this, then it continues to be evident and accessible that on Nov. 4, 2006 the Waybackmachine recorded Justia published the true original opinion issued by the Supreme Court with no tampering evident. Minor v. Happersett is cited on page 22 directly referencing Presidential eligibility as follows:

“Citizenship is membership in a political society, and implies a duty of allegiance on the part of the member and a duty of protection on the part of the society. These are reciprocal obligations, one being a compensation for the other. Under our Constitution, a naturalized citizen stands on an equal footing with the native citizen in all respects, save that of eligibility to the Presidency. Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162, 165, 22 L. ed. 627; Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94, 101, 28 S. L. ed. 643, 645, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 41; Osborn v. Bank of United States, 9 Wheat. 738, 827, 6 L. ed. 204, 225.”

The July 6, 2008 Waybackmachine snapshot of Luria v. US is the first snapshot that shows the tampering:

“Citizenship is membership in a political society, and implies a duty of allegiance on the part of the member and a duty of protection on the part of the society. These are reciprocal obligations, one being a compensation for the other. Under our Constitution, a naturalized citizen stands on an equal footing with the native citizen in all respects save that of eligibility to the Presidency. 88 U. S. 165; Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U. S. 94, 112 U. S. 101; 22 U. S. 827.”

Notice that “Minor v. Happersett” has been removed along with the reference to “Osborn v. United States”, another case which causes trouble for Obama (and McCain). All of the WaybackMachine snapshots between July 6, 2008, and April 13, 2010 for this case, show the same tampering. The current, live Justia page for Luria v. US has been un-scrubbed and shows the original Supreme Court text. It is only with an archival resource such as the Waybackmachine that the alterations can be seen.

At publication, insertion of the URL into the Waybackmachine for this page at Justia still reveals the changes made to this page over time. Repeat this entire process with 25 Supreme Court cases and the extent of the tampering becomes evident.

This is disturbing enough, yet there was another subtle and insidious layer of deception. In every single instance of tampering, the numerical citation attached to Minor V. Happersett, has also been altered. (See Donofrio’s blog for a complete break down of this.) Changing these numbers is yet another layer of deception practiced at Justia.

While Donofrio documents in detail what the finer points of law in both versions mean in his article, this Examiner.com publication documents what this reporter has personally witnessed – the tampering of Supreme Court Cases online in the guise of “Full Text of Case”. This article is not the legal opinion of an attorney; it is witness to an event.

It’s important to note that the only way Justia could block all access to previous versions of their publication of cases would require .txt robots to be placed on their entire domain records at the Waybackmachine. If Tim Stanley were to secure Justia.com from the honest and forthright archiving of the WaybackMachine, he would be an instant pariah in the freedom of information scene of which he is a leader.

Furthermore, if Stanley were to place robots on only the 25 (or more) cases which cite Minor v. Happersett, it would be a de-facto admission of guilt.

It appears that whoever tampered with these cases went back and “fixed” all of them, including 23 Donofrio wasn’t aware of until this week when he conclusively established the sabotage by Justia. For all 25, the pattern is precisely the same. In 2006, the cases at Justia are pristine in the Waybackmachine; word for word from official Supreme Court cases. Then at various points in 2008, the cases are corrupted by removal of the case name “Minor v, Happersett” ( as well as some other case names and text.)

The cases remained corrupted, according to the snapshots of the Waybackmachine in most cases, until late 2010.

Today however, all 25 cases have been painstakingly returned to their official Supreme Court versions; all references to Minor are back, the case and page numbers have been restored, as well as all missing text and references to other cases. Still, the pattern is clearly visible to anyone who takes the time to look at the evidence made available by the Waybackmachine. The sophistication and surgical elegance used to sabotage these cases is astounding, and has been personally witnessed by this reporter.

Every case which has been found to date by Mr. Donofrio has been documented with great attention to all these details. This has been accomplished by downloading the full code of the original un-tainted pages and the corrupted revisions from the Waybackmachine’s date stamped archive, along with screenshots of the pages as they appeared in browsers such as Mozilla Firefox before and after the tampering occurred, and the restored pages.

The volume of data is significant and Mr. Donofrio is in the process of making the entire archive available to the public. The article he has published today contains what he refers to as a “document dump“. It is in reality evidence. The reader is strongly encouraged to view the images which document Justia’s actions. Upon doing so, every member of congress should be notified of the existence of this information. Such usurpation of American history and law cannot be allowed.

Screenshots and links have been sent to several specific media contacts which include the Washington Times, Accuracy In Media, and Free Republic. In the interest of putting this information in front of as many eyes as possible before publication, it has been made freely available since Friday October 18, 2011 in the form of screenshots and saved page code. Should the information presented here be altered on the internet following publication, there will be a significant number of media outlets with knowledge and proof of any further alterations to internet archives.

The penalty associated with violating the “False Writings Statute”, 18 U.S.C. 1018 is jail and a fine for each count. With at least 25 counts if not more, this could mean upwards of 25 years in prison. The manipulation of Supreme Court cases is an offense against all Americans, and the Court itself. If like Fast and Furious this scandal reaches directly to the White House, the ramifications are both dire and catastrophic.

Minor v. Happersett defined the one specific term which Barack Obama could not overcome with “Hope and Change” though he could ‘hope’ someone would ‘change’ the cases which help define the term “Natural Born Citizen.” This case, if it had been sufficiently known to the public and media, and sufficiently documented by supporting citations, might have eliminated the possibility of Obama’s nomination and/or election. Either Obama got lucky in this regard, or the “constitutional law professor” and former editor of the Harvard Law Review had some hand in directing the efforts to erase the very citations in law which define him as a citizen, and at the same time rule him out as a constitutional candidate for President of the United States.

Just as certainly as the corruption at Justia.com has been documented and archived, more will be revealed. Stay tuned, it is expected that this information will generate some significant updates. They will be reported here as they happen.

2011-10-21T19:49:00.000-07:00

Orly Taitz Reports on Hawaii’s Continued Stealth About Obama’s Birth Record

“MULTIPLE APPEALS” TO BE FILED

by Sharon Rondeau

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Dr. and Atty. Orly Taitz of California has filed multiple state and federal actions to discover if Obama is using a fraudulent social security number and forged birth certificate

(Oct. 21, 2011) — On October 12, 2011, Dr. Orly Taitz and Hawaii Assistant Attorney General Jill Nagamine appeared before Judge Rhonda Nishimura in Honolulu Circuit Court following Taitz’s request to inspect the original birth record of Barack Hussein Obama, who is serving as president but may not be constitutionally qualified by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution and has been accused of social security fraud.

Taitz wished to compare the image Obama had released on April 27, 2011 to the records on file with the Hawaii Department of Health, if they exist, to see if they match.

Nagamine represented Health Director Loretta Fuddy, who had refused to comply with two subpoenas issued for disclosure of the birth record. Taitz stated on her website that she believed there has been a conflict of interest in Nagamine representing the Hawaii Department of Health because Nagamine’s husband had represented Obama’s half-sister in a divorce.

Fox Channel KHON-2 covered the court hearing.

Taitz has stated that a total of 135 newspapers across the country have now published articles touching on the Obama eligibility question.

In the past, Nagamine has refused to corroborate that Obama is a “natural-born American citizen,” a statement made by then-Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino. Earlier this year, Fukino stated in an interview with MSNBC that Obama’s original birth record was half-typed and half-handwritten, but the appearance of the image Obama released on April 27, 2011 does not match that description.

As an attorney, Taitz had issued a subpoena to Fuddy to produce the document last summer, followed up by a subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court in Honolulu. On the deadline date of August 8, 2011, surrogates for Fuddy presented a letter to Taitz stating that Obama’s original record could not be disclosed due to privacy concerns.

Taitz has argued that Obama has already waived his right to privacy because of his release of an image purported to be a certified copy of his original birth record on April 27, 2011.

Nishimura dismissed the case at the request of the attorney general’s office as shown in a brief video clip (courtesy ObamaReleaseYourRecords), but Taitz stated that the judge’s decision defies a Hawaii statute regarding government documents. Taitz also maintained that numerous experts have deemed the document Obama released in April a forgery. Taitz claimed that the judge’s decision was “totally biased and dumb.”

Taitz had filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Washington, DC, alleging that the social security number which Obama is using was never assigned to him and therefore wished to inspect the Department’s birth records for Obama to determine if identity fraud has been committed. Last month she met with congressional staffers and legal counsel regarding the social security matter, on which The Post & Email reported here.

Obama has two relatives, both found to be illegal aliens in this country, who appear to have been using stolen social security numbers. Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. District Court in Washington, DC has stated that the public would not be served by discovering whether or not Obama is using a number fraudulently despite affidavits and statements from private investigators stating that he is.

The U.S. Congress, federal judges, and executive branch have all refused to investigate allegations that the purported long-form birth certificate released by the White House is a forgery. WorldNetDaily has published several reports from various document specialists stating that the document is a fraud, including a two-part series based on the work of Dr. Ron Polland, whom The Post & Email had interviewed regarding his initial evaluation of the April 27, 2011 White House release.

Taitz had requested production of the original document through a subpoena which she issued as an attorney, and later, by a subpoena issued by the U.S. District Court in Honolulu. Director of Health Loretta Fuddy had refused to comply with the subpoenas and was defended by Nagamine.

Dr. Taitz described the events of October 12 as follows:

I filed a case in Hawaii against the Director of Health, Loretta Fuddy, and their registrar, Dr. Alvin Onaka, and I was seeking the original birth certificate for expert inspection in light of the fact that it was provided to the public and in court by the U.S. attorneys. According to experts, it is a forgery. The Department of Health refused to comply. I filed a Freedom of information request according to their state statutes, and when they refused to comply, I filed a case in their circuit court.

We had a hearing on October 12, and what the state was arguing that I could not have access to the original document due to the consideration of privacy. It was very clear that the judge had marching orders to dismiss the case on the same basis. The hearing lasted about an hour, and Fox News Hawaii, Channel 2, was there and positioned a camera at the jury box and recorded the proceeding in full. Channel 8 was there as well. The judge had said only one camera could be in the courtroom.

The state argued “privacy.” When I came to my rebuttal, I stated to the judge, “Mr. Obama has waived his right to privacy because he released the document and privacy is no longer an excuse.”

I arose very early that day, and the first thing I did when I arrived in Hawaii was go to the court to verify the time and place of the hearing. I also went to the law library and made copies of their administrative statutes which are the same as everywhere else in the country. There is a statute under Title 8, Administrative Proceedings, Section 91-10, subsection 2, which states, “Documentary evidence may be received in the form of copies or excerpts if the original is not readily available, provided that upon request, parties should be given an opportunity to compare the copy with the original.” It’s clear. The judge clearly violated the rule pertaining to public proceedings.

The Deputy Attorney General’s husband handled Obama’s sister’s divorce, and there is a conflict of interest right there. Her husband is a private attorney for the Obama family. I wrote to Jill Nagamine previously asking her to confirm those facts and if true, recuse herself.

At that point, Nagamine was grasping at straws and came up with a new excuse, which was just unthinkable. Without citing any specific statutes, she stated that in the state of Hawaii, the rules are such that any verification necessary is answered by a “yes” or “no.”

Taitz stated that judges around the country have become “criminally complicit” in “covering up” for Obama’s ineligibility, “forgery,” and social security fraud. When The Post & Email asked her if she believed that “We the People” can do anything about it, she responded:

Absolutely. We see the Tea Party movement, Occupy Wall Street…I think it’s time to occupy the courts, the Congress, the White House. The people need to demand the removal from the bench of corrupt judges and removal from the Congress of corrupt congressmen. First and foremost, we need to clean up our completely corrupted election system. A foreign company, Dominion, which purchased most of our hardware and software as well as Diebold and Sequoia, controls our elections. We need to go back to elections being managed state by state, within the states, not by a foreign corporation, because there is so much evidence of corruption of the voting software and hardware. We need to go back to paper ballots as they did in Germany. We need people at the precincts counting those ballots. We need people verifying that voter registrations are valid. We have an unprecedented level of corruption in our election system, in our judiciary and our Congress. That’s how we have a complete fraud and a criminal sitting in the White House for the past three years.

We have to stand up to this.

Taitz reported that she plans to file “multiple appeals” in Hawaii and in Washington, DC. She is seeking donations for the “thousands and thousands of dollars” which the actions will necessitate. People so inclined may donate at her website.

2011-10-20T21:00:00.000-07:00

Presidential Candidate: The Others Won’t Touch Obama’s Eligibility Question

REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES HAVE “A.D.D.”

by Cody Robert Judy, ©2011

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of the Post & Email.

(Oct. 20, 2011) — Dear Fellow Citizen:

The Media spotlight of the GOP Debates and Republican Campaigns for President are sizzling with excitement.

The pendulum key of our National Security and Economy that is given to the President by order of our U.S. Constitution’s demand for a natural born citizen has been forsaken by all of these spotlighted Candidates and their Campaigns except for one.

The Political arena has succumbed to the richness and the feverish pitch which provides the attention and hype the 2012 candidates for President have craved and worked for.

With so much attention going to Obama the past couple of years, the debates have provided the balm for the attention deficit disorder; however, they have also provided you with the clear picture upon which the candidates for President in the GOP stand on Obama’s eligibility.

The Cody Robert Judy for President 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign has accomplished just the opposite; and we’d like to inform you of the political paradigm that makes this campaign the most important one when it comes to our current Constitutional Crisis and the A.D.D. of all the Republican Candidates.

Instead of sweeping Obama’s U.S.C. eligibility demand under the carpet in order to bask in the Media’s attention, the very name of Cody’s Presidential Campaign brings to your attention the Constitution and effectively Obama’s eligibility.

Cody is calling now for 1,000 Patriots to contribute $100 dollars to his 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign who will receive a signed and numbered commemoration plaque supporting the eligibility Birther Movement; a noble treasure for your families honor in United States history. Donate: www.codyjudy.us

To understand the work and courage behind Cody’s Eligibility Clarion Call would fill a volume that will be shared by our future generations as pivotal in United States history, however, we don’t have time here, so let’s break it down to bare bones, which you can grasp in a few bullet points.

As candidly and transparently as possible let’s shock you with a revelation; the GOP Candidates cannot legally defend the Constitution’s eligibility requirement from Obama without committing what is termed a hate crime.

In crime and law, hate crimes (also known as bias-motivated crimes) occur when a perpetrator targets a victim because of his or her perceived membership in a certain social group, usually defined by racial group, religion, sexual orientation, disability, class, ethnicity, nationality, age, gender, gender identity, social status or political affiliation. Here’s how Obama has used this to silence the GOP Candidates.

The Republican Nominee Sen. John McCain was born in Panama, which is a foreign nation. He was not born in a military base hospital but in a Panama’s hospital and his citizenship was granted to him 11 months after his birth by an Act of Congress specifically for the Panama Canal Zone in a process we call naturalization, or in other words adopted as a citizen the same as any other immigrant applying from Panama or any other foreign country would be.

In 2008 all of the Republican U.S. Senators, accept Sen. McCain, voted for non-binding U.S. Senate Resolution 511 which announced to the world Sen. John McCain was a ‘natural born citizen’. This was co-sponsored in a Democrat controlled U.S. Senate by then Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama.

Cody Robert Judy was the only Presidential Candidate in the 2008 Class of Presidential Candidates to oppose this legally in the Federal District Court in Nevada prior to Sen. McCain being made the Republican nominee; that law suit also objected to Sen. Barack Obama’s Eligibility as Kenyan Born and to a father who was not a U.S. Citizen and a mother not old enough by law to confer U.S. citizenship.

Cody is calling now for 1,000 Patriots to contribute $100 dollars to his 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign who will receive a signed and numbered commemoration plaque supporting the eligibility Birther Movement; a noble treasure for your families honor in United States history. Donate: www.codyjudy.us

There is no Presidential Candidate no matter how popular or politically experienced that can survive the legal rationale of racism. The media, amenable to slander, aired such claims with ABC’s Whoopi Goldberg, NBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell, and CBS News host Bob Schieffer against Donald Trump capable of suing them in court for slander, who also incidentally received a new 65 million dollar contract after bailing out of his toe-dip Presidential run, providing the stage for Barack Obama to release his long form fabrication i.e., birth certificate.

For a Racism or Hate Crime to be justified on a third party, one must first have 2 opposing parties with which to discriminate. In the 2008 Presidential Field, we had Sen. McCain and Sen. Obama both constitutionally unqualified. By giving McCain a pass for being a natural born citizen, albeit unconstitutional, and his being a foreign born naturalized citizen by not 1 but 2 Acts of Congress, the legal assumption would be if you didn’t give Obama the same pass he would have a claim of being treated differently under the exact same laws, justifying a legally abusive verbal ‘hate crime’.

That is right; Cody Robert Judy stands alone on being legally able to bring Obama’s Eligibility up as a grievance to Congress and in his campaign, made possible by his Constitutional Stand against both McCain and Obama. Do you see any reason to support Cody’s Campaign yet?

Now you understand why 3 major media outlets are afraid to let Cody’s Cat out of the bag so-to-speak and why it is so very important for you to support Cody’s U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign for President.

Will you please join Cody Robert Judy’s defense for the Constitution regardless of your party affiliation?

That is our question to you because as American’s we all have the Constitution in common regardless of party affiliation; you can do it with one candidate who has the law on his side, a record to withstand the racist charge, and at the same time is preserving and protecting the United States Constitution as a President should be.

Cody is calling now for 1,000 Patriots to contribute $100 dollars to his 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign who will receive a signed and numbered commemoration plaque supporting the eligibility Birther Movement; a noble treasure for your families honor in United States history. Donate: www.codyjudy.us

While some have used Cody’s not being elected to any office in the past as a claim of his not being qualified, we recall Cody is more Constitutionally qualified than the present occupant of the White House, and Obama’s voting ‘present’ as a Senator certainly didn’t act to qualify him, and by no means is any Governor running prepared either for the vast differences of any particular state compared to the Nation as a whole, but Cody has the record of preserving and protecting the United States Constitution that we want in a President.

We all know that when called upon any one of the candidates with the GOP would likely be honored to serve in Cody’s Cabinet just as Gov. Jon Huntsman served in Obama’s after all we are all concerned about our Country, but to honor our Constitution that unites all of 50 States, don’t you think rewarding a man whose defended the Constitution’s key to our National Defense and Economy makes common sense and more importantly will put Washington, DC on notice that We The People are in fact in charge?

Cody Robert Judy is blowing the Constitution’s Trumpet unlike any other presidential candidate in 2012 and we’re asking you to join him. He is serving you now as you would want a President to be serving the Constitution. Let’s not “hope” for a candidate to serve the Constitution when they get there; let’s elect one who is serving the Constitution now. Please go to www.codyjudy.us and make a donation now.

Cody is calling now for 1,000 Patriots to contribute $100 dollars to his 2012 U.S.C. Eligibility Campaign who will receive a signed and numbered commemoration plaque supporting the eligibility Birther Movement; a noble treasure for your families honor in United States history. Donate: www.codyjudy.us

————————-

Editor’s Note: The Post & Email does not endorse candidates for any office. Here, we have reproduced Mr. Judy’s address to fellow Americans because of its focus on the Obama eligibility question, which The Post & Email has covered from its inception in late 2009. The solicitation for donations is Mr. Judy’s alone.

2011-10-20T10:33:00.000-07:00

Are All of the Obamas Illegal Aliens?

“MASTERS AT GAMING THE SYSTEM”

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

October 20, 2011

The Social Security Administration refuses to release information about the Connecticut social security number Obama is using which many have claimed is fraudulent

Dear fellow American,
There is substantial evidence that practically the entire Obama Family are masters at gaming the system, milking it for whatever it is worth, and engaging in FRAUD whenever necessary. This is a VERY SERIOUS CHARGE. Perhaps you are aware that several lawsuits are currently under way, trying – under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) – to force the Social Security Administration to produce the “original” Application Form, where Barack Obama supposedly applied for the Social Security Number listed on his latest Federal Income Tax Form 1040. These lawsuits are getting nowhere because corrupt Federal Judges are inexplicably refusing to exercise their sworn duty to fairly administer the laws. WHY???
Nearly every member of the US Congress (all 535 members), all 9 members of the US Supreme Court, all members of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff have been notified by Registered US Mail – of compelling evidence – that Obama is a FRAUD - with a nebulous background. Private Investigators have determined the frightening reality that almost 40 Social Security Numbers have been traced to Barack Obama!!! Why would a person need that many SSNs, unless for fraud and corruption – like laundering bribes and payoffs. Why won’t our elected officials at least publicly investigate these serious matters ???
Numerous Complaints of Fraud and Treason have been filed with the FBI and the Justice Department. Why will they not at least Publicly Declare that these numerous charges have been investigated and found Baseless???
The “link” below will take you to the story behind Barack’s “Uncle Roy.” The latest family scandal – Uncle-Gate … which follows Auntie-Gate. He too is an illegal alien in this country from Kenya. He was recently arrested for DUI, after nearly hitting a police car. Turns out he has 2 SSNs, has been Ordered Deported before, but is an “abscounder” – who refuses to leave. The colored words in the Article below are “hot links” to other Sources which back up the accusations.
WHY IS D.C. TERRIFIED TO FACE THE TRUTH??? It looks like we need to replace EVERYBODY there – and Start All Over, again!!! Remember in November 2012.
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/10/06/omar-onyangos-felonies-examined-in-unclegate/

2011-10-19T17:44:00.000-07:00

Republican Leaders are Helping Obama Destroy America

KNOWINGLY CREATING A DICTATORSHIP

by Lawrence Sellin, ©2011

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

Theodore Roosevelt was the 26th President of the United States as well as an historian, particularly in naval affairs

(Oct. 18, 2011) — “Political parties exist to secure responsible government and to execute the will of the people. From these great tasks both of the old parties have turned aside. Instead of instruments to promote the general welfare they have become the tools of corrupt interests, which use them impartially to serve their selfish purposes. Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics, is the first task of the statesmanship of the day.”

President Theodore Roosevelt spoke those words in August 1912. They could have easily been spoken today.

Under Barack Obama, the Democrat Party has been transformed into an anti-American and anti-democratic movement funded from international sources, sustained by the ideology of anti-neocolonialism and executed through socialist and dictatorial policies.

Obama indeed embraced the “Dreams from his Father.” In a 1965 paper “Problems Facing Our Socialism” published in the East Africa Journal, his Muslim father, Barack Obama Sr., proposed expanding government control, wealth seizure by the state and the confiscation of foreign owned land, all policies closely resembling those eventually implemented by President Robert Mugabe of totalitarian and moribund country of Zimbabwe.

As Dinesh D’Souza wrote and the Obama-supported Occupy Wall Street mobs are now violently expressing throughout the country:

“From a very young age and through his formative years, Obama learned to see America as a force for global domination and destruction. He came to view America’s military as an instrument of neocolonial occupation. He adopted his father’s position that capitalism and free markets are code words for economic plunder. Obama grew to perceive the rich as an oppressive class, a kind of neocolonial power within America. In his worldview, profits are a measure of how effectively you have ripped off the rest of society, and America’s power in the world is a measure of how selfishly it consumes the globe’s resources and how ruthlessly it bullies and dominates the rest of the planet.”

The rich, according to the “Occupy Wall Street” protesters, Obama and the Democrat Party, aren’t paying their “fair share.” This by itself seems odd given that the top 1% of Americans pay 40% of all federal income taxes; the next 9% of income earners pay another 30%. So the top 10% pays 70% of the taxes.

As D’Souza notes, Obama’s anti-neocolonialism explains his support for the U.S. Export-Import Bank offer of $2 billion in loans and guarantees to Brazil’s state-owned oil company Petrobras to finance exploration in the Santos Basin near Rio de Janeiro–not so the oil ends up in the U.S., but so that the oil can stay in Brazil.

Coincidentally, George Soros invested nearly $1 billion in Petrobras shares for his hedge fund right before the Export-Import Bank announced the loan.

Obama’s philosophy also explains why he supports a $100 million mosque near the site where terrorists in the name of Islam brought down the World Trade Center and his directive to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to improve relations with the Muslim world by finding “a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science and math and engineering.”

It has never been clear who paid for Obama’s Harvard education, but it is possible, if not likely, that the money came from Saudi Arabia.

It was Obama’s friendship with Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour and his sponsorship of Obama as a prospective Harvard law student, however, that probably helped merge Obama’s innate anti-colonialist views with those of an Islamic and black nationalist.

Formerly known as Donald Warden, al-Mansour, an American, was a mentor of Black Panther founders Huey Newton and Bobby Seale in the early 1960s. He changed his name after studying Islam and learning Arabic. He is well known within the black community as a lawyer, an orthodox Muslim, a black nationalist, an author, an international deal-maker, an educator, and an outspoken enemy of Israel. His writings and books are packed with anti-American rhetoric reminiscent of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s disgraced former pastor. Al-Mansour has close ties to Saudi Arabia and is a personal advisor to Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, the world’s 19th wealthiest person.

Obama’s and the goals of his anti-American fellow travelers can best be achieved by assaulting the Constitution, fostering alternative legal structures like sharia law, economically weakening America to the point of global impotence and fragmenting America into a politically-correct and multicultural society.

Those goals have been incorporated into the policies of the Democrat Party, a process which continues without any significant opposition from the Republican Party, both of whose members have become the tools of corrupt interests, which use them impartially to serve their selfish purposes.

For over three years the United States has faced its gravest Constitutional crisis since the Civil War and the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people.

Yet not a single Republican at the national level has honored his or her oath of office to support and defend the Constitution by calling for an investigation of Obama’s ineligibility for the Presidency or his crimes committed both before and after occupying the Oval Office.

Obama is an illegal President who violates the Constitution and openly flouts the rule of law by forging his birth documents and Selective Service registration and uses a Social Security number not issued to him.

The evidence is overwhelming that Obama released a forged Certificate of Live Birth on April 27, 2011. A digital document expert has now created a forged duplicate of that long-form birth certificate describing the methodology used to deconstruct the White House document for the purpose of reconstructing the forged version and has made deductions about the alleged forger.

Starting in 2008 and continuing today, Obama and the main stream media successfully intimidated the cowardly Republicans by threatening to call them names like “racist” or “birther.”

Now the Republicans are complicit in a cover-up of Obama’s crimes.

Instead of doing the right thing and working to shatter the unholy alliance perpetuating permanent political corruption, the Republican leadership has decided to do what is politically expedient, perform the role of useful idiots and help Barack Obama further damage the United States.

Ambrose Bierce accurately described Washington, D.C. politics in “The Devil’s Dictionary” (1911): as a strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles; the conduct of public affairs for private advantage.

The Democrats are hopelessly corrupt, anti-American and beyond salvation. The Republicans have chosen lust for power and greed over love of country.

Short of revolution against the corrupt politicians, ordinary Americans still have one remaining potent weapon; withhold their votes for Republican candidates who refuse to support and defend the Constitution by not speaking out against Obama’s ineligibility and crimes.

Whether with or without Obama in 2012, if the political leadership continues to subvert the Constitution and disregard the rule of law, national chaos will ensue and armed defense by a citizenry being robbed of its life and liberty by an invisible government will be inevitable.

——————————

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He receives hate mail at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com

2011-10-19T17:34:00.000-07:00

Inside Africa: Near pristine image of Barack Obama’s 1961 baby footprint has surfaced in 2011

SPECIAL EDITION

by Lucas Daniel Smith, ©2011, blogging at WasObamaBorninKenya

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/10/19/inside-africa-near-pristine-image-of-barack-obama%e2%80%99s-1961-baby-footprint-has-surfaced-in-2011/

(Oct. 19, 2011) — Inside Africa: Near pristine image of Barack Obama’s 1961 baby footprint has surfaced in 2011.

Thirty-two months have passed since I exited Africa with a certified (2009) copy of Barack Obama’s 1961 Coast Province General Hospital (CPGH), Mombasa, British Protectorate of Kenya, Certificate of Birth. Said certificate of birth contains an image of a baby footprint. Said footprint is located in the lower left corner of the certificate. A close-up of the footprint is pictured below:

Observers have questioned the significance of the image found on the 1961 Kenyan hospital certificate of birth. Is the image merely a generic adornment, ornamentation or ‘trimming’ found on all of that particular hospital’s certificates of birth for that era? Or is the footprint that of the child bearing the name Barack Hussein Obama II?

We asked ourselves, ‘Was Kenya using inked prints on other forms of identification in and prior to the year 1961?‘

Answer: YES. (Left Thumb Impression / Right Thumb Impression)

Kenya Pass Book FEB 1 1958 (date format and fingerprints)

We then asked ourselves, ‘Are there other hospital birth certificates which contain only one footprint, as opposed to both feet, issued in or prior to the year 1961?‘

Answer: YES.

Patricia Anne Gillespie / 1950 hospital birth certificate with one footprint / embossed seal

For sometime now I’ve been in fervent pursuit of corroborating certificates of birth issued by the Coast Province General Hospital (CPGH), Mombasa in or around the year 1961. At worst I hoped to ascertain and establish that the footprint is a generic image contained on other same era certificates issued by the said hospital. At best I hoped to demonstrate that the footprint is unique and differs slightly in form from other footprints contained on other same era certificates issued by the said hospital. In either case, I could substantiate and provide evidence to support the fact that the said footprint-birth-certificate is not atypical of other same era certificates issued by the said hospital.

For some months now I have been working a slow and slothful, yet promising, scheme to gain access to colonial/protectorate records issued by the Coast Province General Hospital. A few days ago I received notification from long-time personal contacts (friends) now inside Kenya to the effect that they’d gained access to select birth records at the Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya via one of the hospital’s employees.

What I have seen so far has come via webcam chat sessions. I’ve seen what appears to be partial views of a CPGH certificate of birth which is nearly identical to the document that I obtained at the CPGH in 2009. James O.W. Ang’awa is listed as the attending doctor and the birth place of the father is listed as Kanyadhiang Village, Nyanza. The footprint appears identical in shape and size to the footprint on the document that I obtained in 2009. However, unalike the very dark and muddy footprint image contained on the 2009 certified copy, the footprint that I have seen over the webcam is lighter, more pronounced and the lines and wrinkles of the skin are all discernible. Moreover, the paper certificate appears to be light brown, tawny or perhaps beige in color.

I’ve also now been shown partial views of another CPGH certificate of birth which contains the name of a different doctor and a different birth place of father and a different-looking footprint.

I will report again soon.

2011-10-19T17:21:00.000-07:00

CONGRESS KNOWS ABOUT HIS DECEIT YET ALLOWS HIM TO REMAIN IN THE WHITE HOUSE

by Neil Turner

Are the Democrats who propelled Obama through the primaries and to the presidency satisfied with the "hope and change" he promised?

(Oct. 19, 2011) — The IM/UN/IN-ABILITIES of Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah/Bounel:

INELIGIBILITY – he is unable to meet the Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 ELIGIBILITY requirements of the Office of President;
UN-E-VERIFIABILITY – he is unable to pass our Government’s own E-verify program with the SS # he has provided to the Nation;
INABILITY – to speak intelligently without his teleprompters and the words of others placed in front of him;
INSTABILITY – of mind (one has to be out of their mind to think they can commit blatant treason and usurp the Presidency – as a foreign-born Sharia promoting Muslim, and non-natural born non-US Citizen – and get away with it for 2 terms, never mind one);
UN-INTELLIGIBILITY – whenever he speaks without his teleprompters, he is absolutely un-intelligible (uuuuhh; uuuuhh; uuuuhh);
INCREDIBILITY – he has lied so much (it is a ‘high crime’ to lie whenever one speaks under oath of office) that he has no ‘credibility’ – worldwide – whatsoever;
IMPLAUSIBILITY – his responses to any questions about his past and his origins are so implausible as to call for a willful suspension of disbelief – by a nation of complicit Zobama-bies;
UNBELIEVABILITY – it is unbelievable that a ‘Christian’ (and an admitted adult ‘apostate’ of Islam) would bow to Muslim Kings, would cancel the National day of prayer, would host dinners at the White House for Muslims only, would have Muslims (whose political movement goals are the replacement of our Supreme Law with Sharia law) and other domestic terrorists on his staff, and that there would not be a fatwa of death on his head (for his ‘apostasy’) by the Muslim world.

Considering the foregoing, it seems inconceivable that, but for the Conspiracy of Congress, the Supreme Court, the Judiciary, and the complicity of the Media – that this phony, this fraud, this foreign-born, Sharia promoting, usurping Muslim traitor – still sits in our White House spewing his anti-American hate and destruction.

“The Republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who continue to acknowledge a virtual Ghost as their lawful President & Commander in Chief.”

It is UNBELIEVABLE that we can have all these ‘presidential’ debates about how each of them can save this Nation – without addressing the INELIGIBLITY of the usurper, or even the UN-E-VERIFIABILITY of the Social Security number of the person whom they acknowledge – without question – as the leader of the ‘Free World’.

That is why the www.PatriotsUnion.org and the www.VeteranDefenders.org are converging on Washington, D.C. on 11.11.11 with their NATIONAL CALL FOR A UNITED ACTION and their DECLARATION TO RESTORE A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC.

If you can’t make it to D.C. for this massive show of support for the restoration of our Constitution, then you can at least sign up with your financial and/or moral support.

Remember:

“With the privilege and honor of knowing of, swearing to, and living under our Constitution,
comes the responsibility and duty of defending, maintaining and adhering to it.”

In Liberty.

Neil B. Turner
Citizens for the Constitution

www.PatriotsUnion.org
www.VeteranDefenders.org

2011-10-19T17:11:00.000-07:00

New Hampshire State Representative Charges Obama with treason!

Open letter to all Members of Congress,

"IT IS TIME TO MAKE UP YOUR MIND"
I am formally asking you to bring a commission of treason against Mr. Barack Hussein Obama.

We have a President who allows our borders to be violated by illegals of any country while we are at war. He allows them work permits, access to our services and when apprehended by law enforcement refuses to have them jailed or deported. Barack Hussein Obama has crossed the line, and under Article III, Section 3 of our Constitution is guilty of treason by giving aid and comfort to the enemy and attempting to overthrow our government from within.

Now is the time for members of Congress to finally do your Constitutional duty and hold Barack Hussein Obama accountable for his crimes against America. Mr. Obama is a fraudulent president who is selling out America.

It's time Mr. Obama is called accountable for his treasonous actions. I can only hope our members of Congress have the intestinal fortitude to do what needs to be done. It is time to make up your mind "Do you stand with this fraud and treasonous president or with the American people and our Constitution which you swore to protect and defend"?

Thank you,
Harry Accornero 603-387-9708
Representative, Laconia, NH

2011-10-18T14:00:00.000-07:00

Opinion: Hawaii Court Hearing Verifies that White House and Health Department Have the Same Fraudulent Document

WHY PRESENT OR MAINTAIN A FORGERY?

by Just Thinking

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/10/17/opinion-hawaii-court-hearing-verifies-that-white-house-and-health-department-have-the-same-fraudulent-document/

Has the Hawaii Department of Health colluded with Obama to maintain a forgery as an authentic birth record?

(Oct. 17, 2011) —

On January 18, 2011, Hawaii Governor Abercrombie admitted publicly that “a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.”

Then around April 11, 2011, Dr. Fukino said that “she found the original birth record, properly numbered, half typed and half handwritten, and signed by the doctor who delivered Obama, located in the files.”

Then on April 25, 2011, Hawaii Dept of Health Director Fuddy wrote to Obama’s attorney, “Enclosed please find two certified copies of your ORIGINAL Certificate of Live Birth. I have witnessed the copying of the certificate and attest to the authenticity of these copies.” And that same day Governor Abercrombie put out a press release saying that since 2001, it was Hawaii’s policy “to issue and provide only the computer-generated Certifications of Live Birth, and to not produce photocopies of actual records to fulfill requests for certified copies of certificates. Director Fuddy made an exception for President Obama by issuing copies of the ORIGINAL birth certificate.”

Then on April 27, 2011 in the White House press conference, Obama’s White House Counsel Bob Bauer stated that Hawaii officials had copied the long form birth certificate and that counsel had gone to Hawaii to pick it up. Bauer said, “And you’ll see the letter from the director of Health Department that states she oversaw the copy and is attesting to it.” Then Assistant to the President Dan Pfeiffer stated that the two certified copies of the birth certificate had a state seal.

Obama received his official copy of his certified original long form Certificate of Live Birth from Fuddy and posted it on the White House website on April 27, 2011. Surprisingly, it was not half typed and half hand written as Dr. Fukino had stated, and there was no visible state seal.

While many experts have indicated that the birth certificate is a fraud, there are some basic issues in the document that stand out to even the layman. There were some very strange things in Obama’s long-form birth certificate document such as:

the birth certificate number 61- 10641,

BARACK’s name,

Stanley Ann Dunham Obama’s signature,

field descriptor text, etc., which were each split into two different layers of the pdf document.

And there was more problematic fraud in Obama’s birth certificate, as some elements (such as the registrar’s date stamp) are linked elements from another source which were then scaled 24% and rotated -90 degrees.

Then there was also the problem of the misspelled “the” in the registrar’s stamp which was spelled “TXE”.

And there was the nice happy face that the forger drew into the “A” in Alvin’s signature.

In the October 12 court hearing of Taitz v Fuddy, Onaka, Attorney Orly Taitz stated, “I showed them different provisions in their state law, that showed, that as an attorney with a case, where the certified copy is at issue, I am entitled to get verification of the documents…” So Orly was asking the court for verification that the fraudulent birth certificate that Obama released was in fact the same as what Hawaii had on file in their official records. Orly continues, “[Asst Atty General] Nagamine scrambled to come up with something and she came up with the stupidest excuse. She said that the state of HI verifies documents with only two words: yes or no, meaning that the document is yes, in records or no, not in records. And they verified and said yes…”

So now that Nagamine has said that Obama’s fraudulent birth certificate on the White House website is the same as the long-form birth certificate that Hawaii has been hiding in its official records, we now know that Hawaii’s so-called ORIGINAL birth certificate is fraudulent, too. And that means that there is no authentic Hawaiian birth certificate for Obama–or else Obama would have put it on the White House website rather than that fraudulent birth certificate with the smiley face. And Obama’s attorney Bob Bauer also told us that this long-form birth certificate that Dan Pfeiffer put on the White House website was the document that Fuddy had certified as a copy of the ORIGINAL long-form birth certificate in Hawaii’s official records. And when Pfeiffer was asked if Obama would later be holding his own birth certificate, Pfeiffer said, “He will not, and I will not leave it here for him to do so. But it will — the State Department of Health in Hawaii will obviously attest that that is a — what they have on file.”

Why couldn’t Obama hold his own birth certificate? Obviously everyone at the White House knew it was fraudulent and they just didn’t want Obama’s picture taken holding his own fraudulent birth certificate. So if Fuddy and Nagamine attest that Obama’s “original” birth certificate that Hawaii has in its records is the same as the fraudulent copy at the White House, then the State of Hawaii has no authentic long-form birth certificate for Obama. So Hawaii has just proven that Obama was not born in Hawaii. This means that Obama and the entire White House as well as state officials in Hawaii colluded in this identity fraud.

That fits right in with Obama stating that he was born at Queens Medical Center (on Obama’s Organizing For America website and other sources),

and then stating he was born at Kapiolani.

He’s the only person alive who was born at two different hospitals. Did Obama think that if he said he was born in one hospital in the US that was good, but saying that he was born in two hospitals was twice as much proof that he was born in the US?

Even though Fuddy says that Obama was born at Kapiolani, strangely, officials at Kapiolani won’t confirm that. In fact, Hawaii’s senior election official Tim Adams stated, “We called the two hospitals in Honolulu: Queens and Kapi’olani. Neither of them have any records that Barack Obama was born there.”

If Obama wasn’t born at either one of the hospitals that Obama says he was born at, then where did this long-form birth certificate in Hawaii’s “official” records come from? Actually, it was three different hospitals that Obama was born in. In 2009 the Kenyan Ministry of National Heritage honored Kogelo as the “birthplace of President Barack Obama.” And that means that Obama’s grandmother Sarah was telling the truth when she said not once, but twice, that Obama II was born in Kenya.

2011-10-17T19:21:00.000-07:00

HOW DO COMMON AMERICANS UNDO “THE COMPLETE AND UTTER TAKEOVER?”

The Horse is Dead, so Stop Kicking It

by One Pissed-off Vietnam Vet

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

"When in the course of human events..."

(Oct. 16, 2011) — So maybe the horse didn’t actually die that fateful January day in 2009, but that’s certainly the day when we took the mortal blow. We’ve been hearing the word “recovery” as if being concerned about how the suntan is somehow related to the femoral artery being severed. Now here it is, three years after the yet-to-be-vetted president took office, and we’re still doing nothing but blowing hot air at one another and expecting something to happen. Well, nothing’s going to happen without some sort of physical involvement, and that’s the bottom line.

One definition of a physical involvement would be to sail my cruiser up the Potomac but, alas, I can’t do that since they’ve sent her to the recycling bin years ago. Another example would be the recall election of every member of Congress who has failed to uphold his Oath of Office. The same goes for each and every judge who has had a hand in keeping the bum Obama in office. But a recall election would require at least a veneer of honesty, which isn’t likely when judges have ruled that we American citizens have “no standing” as to finding out whether any employee of the Federal Government is qualified to collect a government paycheck.

But the above examples of a physical response are more or less reactionary; even the Navy warship is an “idea’ of physical force. Concerns, complaints and obvious consensus of opinion that Obama is not qualified to hold the office of president through e-mails or actual letters sent to elected representatives have been an exercise in futility. Believe me, everyone within the Beltway has known Obama isn’t eligible to hold the office, but the gravy train has been too good to them all to upset the apple cart.

Quite amazing, entertaining and interesting to watch: the complete and utter takeover of a country by circumventing the very laws that make up the essence of the United States and her Constitution. And there is no way it couldn’t have happened without the express approval and participation of both political parties, law enforcement, the Joint Chief of Staff, the Federal Reserve Bank, and our not-to-be-trusted mainstream media.

Untold thousands of well-meaning but naive individuals, thousands of greedy individuals who sold out their country for thirty pieces of silver or for a couple of million (the amount is of no account; it’s the intent that is paramount), and thousands who turned traitor by actively taking a leading role in trashing our Constitution, as our worthless Attorney General did for failing to prosecute “his people” for voter intimidation, all deserve to be fined, undergo loss of pension, loss of liberty, or loss of life if they don’t succeed in destroying America. By crossing the line, they have declared themselves to be immune from previous restraints and are well aware of the consequences of not succeeding in turning over the United States to one governed by Islamic Law, called Sharia.

Voices echoing on deaf ears to millions about the need to be understanding and tolerant will result only in their throats being slit by a régime that worships death while we cherish life. There is no way for America to win her freedoms back unless it is done physically. The enemy will not give up without a fight, and we will not win our country back without one.

2011-10-10T10:36:00.000-07:00

Debate is over! He’s not natural born – Part II

AND WHY THEY ARE ALL COMPLICIT

by JB Williams, ©2011

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

The Statue of Liberty depicts Lady Libertas, the Roman goddess of freedom

(Oct. 9, 2011) — In a World Net Daily expose’ regarding the final word on Obama ineligibility, I discussed the fact that Barack Hussein Obama II became the 44th resident of the people’s White House by way of outright fraud and explained that no matter which definition of natural born citizen one cherry-picks for their own political agenda, Obama cannot pass the test.

The U.S. Senate got the definition of natural born citizen exactly right in Senate Resolution 511 regarding John McCain, but refuses to apply the same definition to Barack Hussein Obama II. That’s because McCain can pass the test and Obama can’t. As a result, some think that he isn’t actually president, but if you look here, you will see him listed as our nation’s 44th. He’s the one at the bottom of the list… according to official records – Obama can and must be impeached.

I also pointed out that this massive fraud could not have been carried out, let alone covered up, by Obama himself. He needed a lot of help and he had a lot of help. I list many of his little helpers in Part I.

Then I ended the piece with a promise to discuss the question – “why” nobody will do anything about it in Part II, and here we are…
Two words – National Security

Most Americans would be shocked to know what all our government is truly capable of in the name of national security. Allowing the greatest election fraud in U.S. history to stand or be swept under the carpet is nothing, compared to many other things the government engages in, all in the interest of national security.

There is a pact in place inside Washington D.C. Even though nearly every D.C. insider knows that Barack Hussein Obama is not eligible for the office he currently holds, they failed to stop it from happening and the people elected him, albeit under false pretenses and with a bit of funny business at the polls.

Once the people voted for him, even though he should have never been allowed to appear on the ballot to begin with, the rest was predictable. Once the crime was committed, involving many of the key leaders of our federal government, only two choices were left.

Admit it, take responsibility for it and reverse it – or – act like it never happened. As politicians can always be counted upon to serve themselves above all others, they simply chose what was behind door number two – it never happened!
A Rock and a Hard Place

To put it lightly, there was no clean way out of the constitutional crisis they had created. Either way they go, national security is at risk.

Remember that in 2008, nobody thought for a moment that the “nobody from nowhere newbie” with a totally blank résumé could ever defeat the most powerful political force in the world at the time, the Clinton War Room, and knock off Hillary in the DNC primaries.

But, he did… He did because his political War Room was even bigger and nastier than the Clintons’.

Obama’s campaign was backed by huge sums of Middle Eastern and International Socialist cash, lots of it. His campaign had nothing to do with job qualifications, but rather “making history” – by intensifying and exploiting racial divides. Not even the Clintons could compete with Obama without being called “racist bigots.”

All other 2008 candidates knew that they could not promise to pull troops out of Iraq or Afghanistan upon taking office, Obama and libertarian Ron Paul being the exceptions. To no surprise to anyone but the kids who support Paul and Obama, we still have troops in Iraq and Afghanistan today, as Obama sets out on his re-election bid. We couldn’t withdrawal and we haven’t, despite the campaign promises. All of the grown-ups knew this in 2008.

Only Obama supporters thought socialism was the solution for the recession that began when Democrats won back control of congress in 2006. Everyone else knew that it was time to invest in free-market capitalism abroad, and that’s what investors are still doing today. Except investors in international power of course, like George Soros, who are still heavily invested in Obama…

So, Obama took the political elite by surprise. Everyone was anticipating a Hillary Clinton campaign in the fall of 2008. The people behind Obama didn’t vet Obama because they knew he wouldn’t vet. Nobody else bothered vetting Obama because nobody thought Obama would ever win the primary.

They had no idea who this man was – who was behind him or that it was a done-deal from day one. They even hand-picked John McCain for him to run against, knowing that McCain couldn’t rally the Republican base and Obama was a lock once Hillary was out of the way.

This is how modern politics is played. Always bet on a sure thing… leave nothing to chance.

Many D.C. insiders were complicit – the rest were caught off guard. None of them wanted to admit what had just happened, or take responsibility for the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people. Bet on the sure thing, the ignorance and apathy of the American people, 50% of whom don’t even bother to vote!
Forget the right thing – do the easy thing, nothing!

They needed the press on-board. Most of the American press had been in the pocket of international socialism since the 60s. So that part was easy. Others like FOX News folks had to be bought or blackmailed, or even threatened.

They were told that they would be responsible for all-out civil war if the truth ever came out and the “black man” was removed from office after “making history.”

They would report on riots in the streets and racial violence unlike anything we have seen since the Watts riots, not to mention global humiliation, that the most advanced nation on earth was so easily fooled by a simpleton with no background whatsoever, and a few political cronies who knew how to exploit the average American voter with empty promises of “hope and change.”

There was no way they wanted this laid at their doorstep. The best thing to do was nothing at all…
Then came those damned Birthers

A class of self-appointed investigative reporters who would simply not let it go until they got to the bottom of it all. Who this man was, where he came from, what he really had in store for America and what to do about it… These were questions some simply had to find an answer for, and they did.

Obama’s DNC Certifications FRAUD
His 1st BC (COLB) FRAUD
His 2nd BC (COLB) FRAUD
His 3rd BC (long form) FRAUD
His childhood records – GONE
His adoption records – GONE
His college records – GONE
His travel records – GONE
His Social Security number(s) – FRAUD
His story – won’t add up
His friends – crooks, thugs and socialists
Even his claim to be a “black man” is false

Yet no matter the mountain of evidence, no court in the land will hear that evidence, no law enforcement agency in the country will arrest him, no intelligence officer who must know the truth, will spill the beans, and Congress, along with the Supreme Court, are simply hoping to let the clock run out on his term and sweep him under the carpet in 2012.
What are they afraid of?

The evil dictatorial nature of the Obama regime leads many to speculate about all sorts of fantastic conspiracy theories behind the Obama disaster. But as is usually the case, the truth is much simpler and even much more obvious.

Once in the trap, it is a calculated risk no matter which escape hatch you try. At the end of the day, the powers-that-be simply miscalculated.

When push came to shove, and a true constitutional crisis was staring them right in the face, they simply chickened out. They decided to let Obama destroy this nation for four years, allowing the people who voted for him to learn their lesson the hard way, and then sweep it all under the carpet in 2012.

But NOT so fast…

I said it was a miscalculation and it was.

1) Article II of the U.S. Constitution has been directly and purposefully violated, among many other sections of that document. It will remain violated until the matter is corrected, not by the next election, but by correcting the situation for all-time, holding all those responsible accountable.

2) They underestimated the damage Obama could do in four short years. We may already be beyond the point of no return.

3) They overlooked the reality that so long as Article II has no meaning, nothing in the Constitution or Bill of Rights has any meaning.

4) And they underestimated at least some Americans, who would not let this be swept under the carpet.

What Now?

A group of American Veterans are calling for resignations and impeachments all over Washington D.C.

In a nationwide Call-to-Action released this week, Veteran Defenders of America is calling for the immediate removal from office of not only Barack Hussein Obama II, but many of the players who made the Obama Crisis possible as well.

Quoting directly from the document –

“An undisclosed number of American Veterans and former service members have come together to prepare and present this Call-to-Action on behalf of the U.S. Constitution, the Republic, the Rule of Law and equal justice for all freedom loving citizens of the United States of America. Acting together as one, via The Veteran Defenders of America, co-sponsored by civilian patriot group The United States Patriots Union, LLC – we issue the following CALL for peaceful disobedience.

We CALL upon every member of federal, state and local government, legislative, judicial, law enforcement and military, who have taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitutional Republic from all enemies, foreign and domestic, to act upon those oaths for the stated purpose of restoring the Constitutional Republic.
We CALL upon ALL veterans and veteran organizations in America, who still believe in their oath to protect and defend, to unite with us at once – in this Declaration to Restore the Constitutional Republic.
We CALL for ALL citizens who still desire freedom and liberty, to stand with us in peaceful protest, and carry our demands to right the wrongs against our nation in the preservation of freedom, liberty, justice and the rule of law.”

This is a NATIONWIDE Call-to-Action!

The document cites numerous violations of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and more than sixty (60) criminal acts by the Obama administration and members of Congress.

The initiative is sponsored and led by The Veteran Defenders of America and co-sponsored by citizen activist group The United States Patriots Union.

The document is very clear in its charges and its objectives. – “No longer will we sit idly by and tolerate the utter destruction of our country, at the hands of anti-American elitists in Washington D.C. who have mistaken the people’s peaceful tolerance for acceptance of their ill-advised behaviors. The time for all good and decent Americans to stand together, in defense of the Constitution, the Republic, freedom and liberty, has arrived. The Rule of Constitutional Law must prevail. We call upon all who have taken an oath to protect and defend, to take appropriate measures now.”

The Veteran Defenders are also calling for “the immediate and unconditional orderly resignation of Barack Obama, Joe Biden and the entire Obama Cabinet,” among others, and a nationwide patriot March on D.C. on November 11, 2011 – Veterans Day, to demand the immediate restoration of our Constitutional Republic.

“We The Veteran Defenders of America and The United States Patriots Union call for a “unified march” from ALL fifty (50) states to Washington D.C. on Friday November 11, 2011, Veterans Day – led by American veterans and former service members with a clear purpose – to demand the immediate restoration of the U.S. Constitution, the removal and prosecution all of the individuals named herein, by voluntary resignation or articles of impeachment, and the end to Sharia Law on American soil. The Veterans March on D.C. Day – In defense of freedom, liberty and justice.”

The exploited kids involved in the Democratic Socialist March on Wall Street are clueless. Coincidentally, the Democratic Socialists are holding their annual convention in D.C. beginning November 11, in the Washington D.C. suburb of Vienna, Va.

Christian Science Monitor asks, Is the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ movement being hijacked by newcomers? The answer is no, because that so-called protest was run out of the White House from the start, working through former White House staff Van Jones, in cooperation with the left’s labor unions and Canadian Socialists. Labor union thugs aren’t hijacking the movement – they were on-board from the start.

Now that the American veteran community has taken a firm stand, calling on all to keep their oath to protect and defend, and restore our government to lawful leadership, patriots are on the move as they learn about this initiative.

The Democratic Socialists have a clear agenda – but the Veterans have an agenda for America too. It’s freedom!

2011-10-07T10:52:00.001-07:00

A Declaration to Restore the Constitutional Republic

NATIONAL CALL FOR UNITED ACTION

by JB Williams, Timothy Joseph Harrington, and Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely (Ret.), ©2011, The United States Patriots Union, LLC

Editor's Note: Re-posted with permission of The Post & Email.

(Oct. 5, 2011) — “When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” – from the U.S. Declaration of Independence

An undisclosed number of American Veterans and former service members have come together to prepare and present this Call-to-Action on behalf of the U.S. Constitution, the Republic, the Rule of Law and equal justice for all freedom loving citizens of the United States of America. Acting together as one, via The Veteran Defenders of America, co-sponsored by civilian patriot group The Unites States Patriots Union, LLC – we issue the following CALL for peaceful disobedience.

We CALL upon every member of federal, state and local government, legislative, judicial, law enforcement and military, who have taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitutional Republic from all enemies, foreign and domestic, to act upon those oaths for the stated purpose of restoring the Constitutional Republic.
We CALL upon ALL veterans and veteran organizations in America, who still believe in their oath to protect and defend, to unite with us at once – in this Declaration to Restore the Constitutional Republic.
We CALL for ALL citizens who still desire freedom and liberty, to stand with us in peaceful protest, and carry our demands to right the wrongs against our nation in the preservation of freedom, liberty, justice and the rule of law.

This is a NATIONWIDE Call-to-Action!

“We are Facing a Battle That Will Decide our Fate as a Nation!” – Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely (Ret.)

The time to unite and fight for the American way of life has arrived… We did not choose this fight, or this time. The fight has come to us in our time and we will not shrink from our responsibility to protect and defend the United States of America, our Constitutional Republic, and the American way of life. We CALL upon ALL freedom loving Americans to JOIN US in this honorable endeavor. We do so on the following basis…
Abuses and Usurpations

Barack Obama’s once strong approval rating now stands at only 19%. The approval rating of congress is no better. The people have lost all faith in their government…

The demise of our Constitutional Republic has been underway for nearly a hundred years. As the people placidly accepted intolerable offenses against the republic, the states, and the Constitution for decades, the Central power in Washington D.C. grew ever more powerful, ever more abusive, and ever more disconnected from the very people it was formed to represent.

During the last three years, the current administration has committed the most egregious offenses against the people, the states and the Constitution, since the founding of our country and today, they operate as a virtual dictatorship, against the governed, beyond the scope and authority the people granted them in the Constitution and at odds with the will of the vast majority of American citizens.

The actions of the Obama Administration in total, rise to the level of treason against the United States and its people.

The Democratic Socialists of America are currently running Washington D.C. and they recently issued this statement in a Call-to-Action for their millions of members –

“We are the alternative to the tea party conservatives, the Republicans whose only program is to say no, the Democrats who have forgotten what progressive politics really are and the progressives who think that they can stand apart from the left.”

This must not be permitted to stand…

Among other offenses, abuses and usurpations, is the following list of transgressions – (detailed in Appendix A) – altering our constitutional form of government and system of justice without authority…

Violations against Article I of the U.S. Constitution – Congress
Violations against Article II of the U.S. Constitution – The office of President
Violations against Article III of the U.S. Constitution – Judicial Powers
Violations against Article IV of the U.S. Constitution – The State
Violations against Article V of the U.S. Constitution – The Amendment Process
Violations against Article VI of the U.S. Constitution – Oath to the Constitution
Violations against the 1st Amendment of the Bill of Rights
Violations against the 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights
Violations against the 3rd Amendment of the Bill of Rights
Violations against the 4th Amendment of the Bill of Rights
Violations against the 5th Amendment of the Bill of Rights
Violations against the 6th Amendment of the Bill of Rights
Violations against the 7th Amendment of the Bill of Rights
Violations against the 8th Amendment of the Bill of Rights
Violations against the 9th Amendment of the Bill of Rights
Violations against the 10th Amendment of the Bill of Rights
Unlawful use of Military force, here and abroad
Violations of International Treaties and Laws
Numerous violations of the public trust
Misuse of the people’s resources
The bankrupting of the nation, the states and the people
Taxation without representation
Confiscation and Redistribution of the people’s earned assets
Abuse of Judicial power

At this late date, the individually itemized list of abuses and usurpations would require an encyclopedia of unconstitutional offenses to the Republic and there is no evidence to suggest that there remains even one legitimate honest courtroom in the country to which all evidence could be presented.

There is no Article or Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which the current leadership in Washington D.C. has not abused and/or usurped over the last three years.

As a result, the normal courses of action for redress may not be adequate to solve the problem today, as all three branches of the federal government are currently acting as one, all of them beyond the scope and power granted them by the Constitution, against the principles of freedom, liberty and self-governance, and at odds with the vast majority of citizens.

Yet the Constitutional Representative Republic must be restored, no matter the means or the cost.

It is on this foundation that we morally and rightfully call for all good people to rise up, stand together, move to restore the Constitutional Republic, and hold those who have and would stand against the people, fully accountable.
WE THE PEOPLE

On behalf of the Veterans and former Service Members of America, who fought and died for freedom and liberty here and abroad, and all good and decent American citizens from sea to shining sea, we the people of the United States of America hereby demand the immediate restoration of our Constitutional Republic and an end to the Democratic Socialist abuses and usurpations which have become commonplace in the daily corruption of our governmental offices. As the true American people sit idle, the enemy grows in number and strength.

No longer will we sit idly by and tolerate the utter destruction of our country, at the hands of anti-American elitists in Washington D.C. who have mistaken the people’s peaceful tolerance for acceptance of their ill-advised behaviors. The time for all good and decent Americans to stand together, in defense of the Constitution, the Republic, freedom and liberty, has arrived. The Rule of Constitutional Law must prevail. We call upon all who have taken an oath to protect and defend, to take appropriate measures now.

We the people hereby demand

The immediate and unconditional orderly resignation of Barack Hussein Obama, II
The immediate and unconditional orderly resignation of Joseph R. Biden

In addition to the known fact that the Obama/Biden ticket was advanced by way of fraudulent representations concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama II, under Article II requirements for the office of President, the Obama/Biden has committed countless crimes against the U.S. Constitution, our Republican form of government and the American people while in control of the Executive Branch.

They are not able to do this alone, but with the help and cover of many anti-American players, who have also acted at odds with their oaths to protect and defend the Constitution, our Republic and the people of the United States. As a result, these players must be removed from office and held accountable for their actions as well.

This group includes, but is not limited to the following individuals -

The immediate and unconditional orderly resignation of the entire Obama Cabinet, including but not limited to;

the White House staff and unelected Czars
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton
Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner
Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta
Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Interior Secretary Kenneth L. Salazar
Acting Commerce Secretary Dr. Rebecca M. Blank
Labor Secretary Hilda L. Solis
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius
Energy Secretary Steven Chu
Education Secretary Arne Duncan
Homeland Security Secretary Janet A. Napolitano
EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson
Office of Management & Budget Director Jacob J. Lew
UN Ambassador Susan Rice, the entire Council of Economic Advisers
Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor
· House Speaker John Boehner
· House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi
· Senate Leader Harry Reid
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell – all of whom have committed treasonous acts against the people, the states and the U.S. Constitution.

Further, to reinstate the rule of law and the Law of this Land, the U.S. Constitution and our constitutional republic -

In compliance with Article II – Section I of the U.S. Constitution for the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President, — the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.
That every verifiable member of The Communist Party USA, The Socialist Party USA and The Democratic Socialists of America be immediately publicly identified and removed from office for overtly acting against freedom, liberty and the Constitutional Republic.
That in the event that these individuals refuse to immediately resign in an orderly fashion designed to serve the best interests of the United States, we demand that the 66 members of the people’s House who voted against the recent raising of the nation’s debt ceiling, to immediately begin impeachment proceedings against every member of the Obama administration.
That the seven remaining members of the U.S. Supreme Court place an immediate stay on all Executive and Legislative actions taken under the term of the unconstitutional administration beginning January 20, 2009.
That remaining members of the House and Senate immediately act to name new majority and minority leaders of congress, and work with the U.S. Supreme Court in the assigning of new temporary Executive Branch members, acting on behalf of the people and the will of the American majority until such time that the citizens of the United States can elect their new representatives in 2012.
The immediate and unconditional dissolution of all special interest congressional caucuses, including but not limited to The Progressive Caucus, The Black Caucus. In addition, the immediate closure of any and all congressional committees which have been given unconstitutional powers, including the Debt Committee of twelve just formed. Individuals are elected by the people to represent ALL of the people, not special interest groups.
That each state government immediately act to enforce its 10th Amendment right to protect and defend the people of their state against a tyrannical central power in Washington D.C., by recalling all State Guard troops home to protect the sovereignty and security of their respective citizens, as well as state resources and governments.
That each state government act immediately to cut itself off from federal funding, and take the necessary actions to balance their own state and local budgets immediately.

These are our initial demands and nothing less than complete compliance with each of these demands is acceptable to the people of the United States. These demands have been published for public support and delivered to all members of Congress.

Further, it is our position that the normal constitutional line of succession to the presidency does not apply in this circumstance, due to the widespread complicity by members of congress, regarding both the original fraud that placed this administration in power and the ongoing effort to cover up the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American citizens.

The abuse and usurpation of the U.S. Constitution will not be allowed to stand. It is on this basis that We the People make these demands, in full compliance with the law of this land, the Constitution of the United States of America.

It is our sincere desire to affect these immediate and unconditional changes to the people’s government through peaceful processes, causing a minimum degree of disruption to the vital ongoing business of the people and their representative government.

The individuals named in our demand for immediate and unconditional resignations have acted directly and overtly against the people, the states and the Constitution and they must be held fully accountable for their actions.
Call for the People to ACT Now

We are openly calling for the American people to draw a final line in the sand and take a moral and righteous stand for the Constitutional Republic, the rule of law and the future of freedom and liberty.

The time to be tolerant and silent has passed and the time for serious action has arrived. Only the people can restore the Constitution as the Supreme Law of this Land. We must do it peacefully if at all possible and our Founders provided all the tools necessary for peaceful corrections of a ship set off course by internal enemies.

We are calling for the following specific actions, by every active and former service member and every patriotic citizen, no matter their political stripe…

We call upon all members of the U.S. Military, the U.S. Supreme Court, Federal, State, County, Local Law Enforcement, and all Intelligence agencies, to direct all assets of the people of the United States towards the restoration of the Constitutional Republic and stand with the American citizens in compliance with their oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution and the people of the United States.
We call upon ALL American citizens to provide necessary pressure on all law enforcement, judicial, intelligence and military agencies, until those who have sworn to protect and defend the Constitution begin to act upon those oaths.
The current administration has done all it can to whip racial tensions and class warfare into full-blown riots and civil war, including scheduling a “U.S. Day of Rage” for communists, labor union socialists, illegal immigrants, Muslims and blacks across the country. Their “Day of Rage” was scheduled for Constitution Day, September 17, 2011, and although it was a total flop, they will continue to rage against America. It is an open assault on free-market capitalism, waged by modern day Marxists who must be stripped of their entitlement mentality. The LEFT is also planning a “Cairo style occupation of Washington in October, on the ground on Wall Street now and headed towards Washington D.C.” These events are being run by the Obama White House, via a number of left-wing front organizations.
We The Veteran Defenders of America and The United States Patriots Union call for a “unified march” from ALL fifty (50) states to Washington D.C. on Friday November 11, 2011, Veterans Day – led by American veterans and former service members with a clear purpose – to demand the immediate restoration of the U.S. Constitution, the removal and prosecution all of the individuals named herein, by voluntary resignation or articles of impeachment, and the end to Sharia Law on American soil. The Veterans March on D.C. Day – In defense of freedom, liberty and justice.
We call for all Americans who truly do support our troops to march on D.C. with our veterans. We call upon ALL independent truckers, independent contractors, all non-union workers, all independent business owners, agents and investors, all who support free-market capitalism and the right to work, earn and own, to march together with our veterans and former service members on November 11, 2011 – Veterans Day!
To be prepared to act as citizens to protect and preserve the Constitutional Republic, in the event that our public servants, who have sworn an oath to the Constitutional Republic, refuse for any reason, to act upon those oaths.
To act peacefully, but prepared for a violent reaction from our nation’s enemies. To avoid if possible, the RACE WAR being incited by the Obama Administration and the Black and Progressive Caucuses.
Locally, to confront all anti-American infringements upon our Natural Rights with boots on the ground whenever and wherever local, state or federal officials act beyond their scope of authority, or at odds with the Constitutional Rights of the people.
To begin to openly identify and address government corruption at the local, county and state levels, too often found in both governmental and law enforcement offices, also sworn to protect and serve the people of the United States.
To be ready and willing to end the taxation without real representation by refusing to fund the anti-American regime currently in control of Washington D.C., until such time as the taxpayers of this nation are once again properly represented.
To make the necessary provisions to secure and protect your families and neighborhoods in the event of economic instability and social chaos, similar to events already witnessed abroad, by stocking up on cash, food and water supplies, as well as personal protection items.
In the event that the current administration or its thug supporters attempt to use government or civilian force and violence to silence the people, as in the cases of Syria, Libya, Yemen, China’s Tiananmen Square, the Bonus Army of 1932 in the United States, or the UK presently wrestling with black and Muslim violence, the people must be prepared to defend themselves against such tyrannical tactics. We cannot expect that the federal government will act in the best interest of American veterans or citizens.

This CALL FOR ACTION is being issued as a joint initiative, by the leaders and members of The Veteran Defenders of America, The United States Patriots Union. All citizens who want to see the Constitutional Republic restored immediately are encouraged to immediately join one of these unified organizations and become directly engaged in our joint missions to restore America to that shining city on a hill, and beacon of freedom and liberty around the world. We the People are the solution!

Volunteer leaders across the country must join one of these organizations to take part in leading in their local areas. All supporters who do not wish to join these organizations but who do support the initiative can keep up with information concerning the action here.
Foundation for Our United Action

Our Declaration of 1776 establishes the principles upon which The United States of America was founded. On September 17, 1787, our nation’s Founders ratified The United States Constitution, forming a Constitutional Representative Republic as our system of self-governance. From that day forward, the American people are guaranteed a Constitutional Representative Republic of, by and for the people, which was to at all times, operate within the confines of the limited authority provided the government by the people and their respective states.

For decades, our federal government has been operating beyond its constitutional authority, infringing upon the Natural Rights of every American citizen and every American enterprise, until our government has indeed become destructive of the common cause of freedom and liberty.

In its usurpations of the Constitution, it has committed atrocities against the people for which it was designed to protect and serve, until the people are forced to rise up in the name of freedom and liberty, casting off the shackles of soft tyranny and it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Our United Mission

We are finished with changing America to suit every anti-American whim… This time, the change is coming to Washington D.C.

It is not our intent to separate from any foreign King, nor to abolish or alter our Constitutional Representative Republic, but rather to restore it, as the Supreme law of this land, under which both the government and the governed must live.

Our united mission is to end the march of democratic socialism, which has become the most dangerous modern threat to American peace, prosperity, freedom and liberty and reinstate the republican form of self-governance guaranteed every citizen in the U.S. Constitution.

To accomplish this objective, the people responsible for the usurpation of the Constitution must be immediately removed from office and held fully accountable for their actions, setting an example for future generations, who must also be forever vigilant in the common defense of freedom and liberty.

The long train of abuses and usurpations must be brought to a swift end and the Constitutional Republic must prevail, or the United States of America will soon cease to exist.

Our mission is just – it is moral – it is legal and constitutional and it is necessary…

This is not a call to overthrow our entire institutions of government, or subvert the Law of the Land, but rather to restore those institutions to their honorable constitutional forms. As such, and under their oaths to the Constitution and the people whom they are sworn to protect and defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic, it is incumbent upon every citizen, veteran, soldier, officer and agent to use the tools of the people to protect the people and return our government to a Constitutional Republic of, by and for the people.

Let Freedom Ring! May the Creator, who endowed each of us with certain unalienable rights, among them the right to Life, Liberty and the individual Pursuit of Happiness free from government tyranny, bless this mission of, by and for the people of the United States, and may the Lord let freedom ring in America, once again.

We demand an end to government corruption, an end to despotic leadership in D.C., an end to the current assault on all decent and honest American taxpayers, businesses and honorable public servants of the people.

We demand the peaceful return of the people’s government, and we will remain resolute in the defense of the Constitution and the United States of America until the people can once again, feel secure in their nation and government.

IN GOD WE TRUST!

JOIN the MISSION HERE – http://www.veterandefenders.org/ or HERE – http://www.patriotsunion.org/

Non-member supporters can follow the mission here – http://www.facebook.com/groups/262343767138128/

Sign your name in support of the mission here!

Requests for information or interviews should be sent here!

APPENDIX “A”

As a preface to APPENDIX “A”, the following items only scratch the surface. The blatant abrogation of the United States Constitution, trampling the boundaries of law-based authority, deceit, bribery, aiding and abetting our sworn enemies, illegal manipulation of our election process and subverting election laws, and hundreds of other affronts and assaults to our liberties and freedoms, all fall under the category of “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

1. Obama is a National Security threat since he definitely has questionable allegiance to the United States, not to mention his refusal to complete and release full, frank and truthful answers as to who he is. Obama has demonstrated a blatant disregard for the public safety and security.

2. Obama and his handlers released an obvious forged birth certificate after release at least two fraudulent COLBs (Certifications of Live Birth). Obama is also using numerous stolen Social Security numbers.

3. Obama and his incompetent advisors have wreaked economic tyranny on the American people, all the while calling for the rest of us to endure economic sacrifice.

4. Obama has destroyed accepted administrative process by creating 32 Czars who only report to him, bypassing the Congress and Cabinet. *

5. In one year, Obama and his minions doubled our national debt, which took 200 years to accumulate.

6. Obama and his Justice Department sided with a foreign government (Mexico) when they sued the State of Arizona in order to force the continuation of illegal immigration. *

7. Obama and his henchmen proposed a 1% tax on all bank transactions (HR4646) to be implemented after the November 2012 elections.

8. Obama signed HB1388 to use $20 million in taxpayer money to immigrate Hamas refugees to USA, and other migration assistance to Palestinian refugees.

9. Obama passed “Dream Act” by Executive Order which aide’s illegal aliens through “prosecutorial discretion” all to garner votes for his election. The Heritage Foundation has provided extensive proof that illegal aliens and immigrants with green cards are committing rampant voter fraud. *

10. Obama’s socialist, radical, dictatorial Moratorium on drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, for thirty years a major source of energy for America, and which a Federal Court ruled was unconstitutional, continues to prevent drilling, all under the pretense to protect the environment and the fraudulent notion of global warming. He is indifferent to the loss of 10,000 jobs and 87,000 workers destroyed. Perfect excuse to push “Cap and Trade” with environmental regulations, and to push for governmental control of energy industries, i.e. General Motors, banking and healthcare.

11. Obama and his Czars want to tax church contributions and replace charities with government welfare. *

12. This administrations massive expansion of the federal government (350,000 employees) through agencies and Czars, whose goal is to “fundamentally transform America.”

13. Obama’s own Federal Elections Commission documented that he got at least $33.8 million from disallowed foreign contributions, including 520 contributions from interests in Iran, and $30,000 from Hamas-controlled Gaza area. *

14. Obama said, “We must reward our friends and punish our enemies.” 70 individuals who raised $50,000 or more for him “have been rewarded with ambassadorships or high ranking jobs.”

15. Obama and the cabal’s National Security Strategy released in May, allows for the targeted assassination of US citizens including “homegrown terrorists” without due process. *

16. Obama dhimmitude given Ramadan and Iftar dinners in the White House, while he cancels the National Day of Prayer without one word of objection from the Congress.

17. Obama and his Muslim buddies agree and defend a 15 story mosque, bankrolled by terrorist sympathizers and anti-American Muslim groups, to be erected feet from the hallowed ground of the World Trade Center.

18. Obama and his Justice Department’s refusal to support, defend and enforce US law, i.e. Defense of Marriage Act, stating it was unconstitutional, thereby circumventing established law and the rulings of the courts. *

19. Obama and his warmongers attack Libya without any authority from Congress. *

20. ObamaCare ruled unconstitutional and ordered stopped by the Federal Court…it was implemented regardless of the Federal Court. *

21. Congress said Cap and Trade was unconstitutional and refused to pass the same. Obama ordered the EPA to enact the provisions regardless of the Congressional ruling. *

22. Obama’s use of taxpayer money to pay for Democrat propaganda including $15 million for The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act road signs and $18 million for the continually misleading recovery.gov website. *

23. $770 million of taxpayer funds given to Egypt and Cyprus for the restoration of mosques through USAID. *

24. Obama has disgraced the United States by bowing to foreign potentates, while at the same time snubbed our longtime allies, Great Britain and Israel. Obama and his friends have deliberately fostered hate against the Jews and Israel by promoting a Palestinian State.

25. Obama’s Department of Justice refusing to prosecute Black Panthers in Philadelphia caught on tape brandishing weapons in front of a voting site to intimidate voters. Further the stated intentions of political appointees of Obama who said they would ignore voter crimes committed by blacks, Latinos and other minorities. *

26. Obama and his Cabinet intentionally refusing to secure our nation’s borders is in direct violation of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution. This is an effort to blackmail Republican support for comprehensive immigration reform. They are in essence holding the Border States and residents as political hostages during a time when they live in fear and danger. *

27. Obama and his handlers continually ignore Congress’s constitutional obligation to vet presidential appointees, as none of his 32 Czars was vetted by Congress, and his appointment of the head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was appointed during Congress recess. *

28. Department of Homeland Security now investigating to determine the political association for those making Freedom of Information Act Requests. If you are a Republican you request will be delayed and even ignored altogether.

29. Obama’s Justice Department refusing to sue sanctuary cities for violating US immigration law. *

30. Obama’s executive order which allows Interpol to operate in the US with no restraints, and without any oversight from Congress, courts, FBI or local law enforcement. *

31. Obama’s administration and Justice Department discourage whistleblowers and prosecute them.

32. Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton’s ongoing effort to create international small arms accords that will subvert the Second Amendment rights of US citizens.

33. Obama and his State Department has failed to treat as an Act of War the takeover of sovereign land belonging to Arizona by the Mexican drug cartel.

34. The State Department used $23 million in taxpayer money to transform Kenya into a constitutionally communist country where freedom of speech is limited and property rights are based on social justice. Don’t forget the Kenyan constitution allows for Sharia Law in some regions, which means women will not have basic human rights. *

35. As part of the auto industry bailout and forced closings, shut down an unbelievable disproportionate number of dealerships in rural areas that did not vote for Obama.

36. Obama’s refusal to have a press conference and answer the difficult questions as is expected by every US President. And as is usual with his total lack of respect for anyone but himself…he is always late for everything.

37. Obama and his minions have downgraded the value of human life with their opposition to his signing “Born Alive Infants Protection Act”; however they lifted the ban on overseas abortion funding using US taxpayer’s money.

38. Obama’s State Department foreign policy continually will do anything to insult our allies, embarrass the United States, all the while elevating and promoting third world Muslim countries. *

39. Obama and his environmentalist henchmen are prohibiting US industries from taking advantage of our own natural resources including coal, oil, uranium and timber. *

40. Despite all the political rhetoric about the historical downgrade of our nation’s credit rating, the devaluation was a mere shadow of the colossal degradation Obama and his socialist cadres have inflicted on our Country since January 20, 2009. More significant than our nation’s credit, our nation’s credibility as a constitutional republic has suffered relentless and ruthless damage and offense. *

41. Obama deployed 1200 National Guard troops to Border States, where they will, under no circumstances, be used to stop the flow of illegal aliens and drug traffickers.

42. Despite a court’s ruling and Congress’s opposition, Obama’s FCC continues to try to gain control over the Internet, by reclassifying internet companies as telecommunications providers, thereby making them subject to FCC regulation. *

43. A slick move no one noticed moving the Census Bureau out of the Commerce Department directly into the White House and under the control and management of Rahm Emmanuel, Chief of Staff.

44. Obama attempts to run this Country with Executive Orders.

45. Under the cover of secrecy and without any input from Congress, state or local officials and current land owners, the Department of the Interior plans to take control of millions of public and private lands in Western states by designating them national monuments.

46. Obama through Eric Holder has handcuffed and taken over the CIA, which has been the most critical, independent information gathering resource safe-guarding our national security. Obama has revealed, ridiculed and condemned CIA interrogation methods which were previously approved by Congress and cleared through the Justice Department. He has demonstrated to our enemies (terrorists) that they need not fear us. *

47. Obama’s known history is replete with symbiotic associations and participation with admitted anti-American radicals, many of which/who advocate the destruction of American imperialism and capitalism, even though violent means. Consider William Ayers, Khalid Al Mansour, Rhashid Khalidi, Jeremiah Wright, Sol Alinsky, James Cone, Mike Klonsky, as well as organizations such as the Weather Underground, STORM, Chicago Annenberg Challenge, Woods Foundation, ACORN, which have all received major tax payer funded support. Obama has never denied or even argued about his nefarious involvement with these people and organizations.

48. At the expense of the American taxpayer to the tune of $6 Billion, Obama and his handlers have established their own Civilian Paramilitary Security Force made up with the likes of SEIU, STORM, ACORN, RUCKUS, The Apollo Project (Soros), AmeriCorps, Color of Change, Drummond Pike/Project and others who choose to remain anonymous. *

49. Loss of free speech to the tune of half a billion dollars of taxpayer money, given to Obama appointee Mark Lloyd “FCC Diversity Officer”, and avowed pro-Chavez radical, ordered by Obama to rein in free speech on the airwaves by reorganizing the FCC and placing a tax equal to annual operating costs on local radio stations, which they either pay or lose their license to a new minority owner. *

50. Historic and unprecedented move by Obama’s cabal to indoctrinate our children in socialist, humanist garbage, sent a video to all schools, and naturally this scheme was promoted by the NEA, with the children taking a pledge, “…to be a servant to our president and to all mankind”, and then they chant over and over “together we can.” He is asking our children to choose him and his agenda, over anything you might teach at home. *

51. Obama’s appointment of Safe Schools Czar, Kevin Jennings, founder of Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network, has determined required reading material for our schools which promotes pornography, not to mention homosexuality. This information is so massive, if you type into Google, Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar” Is Promoting Child Porn in the classroom-Kevin Jennings and the GLSEN Reading List, click on the first site, you can read it for yourself…be prepared to vomit. *

52. Obama protected union interests over those of GM and Chrysler bond holders during bankruptcy proceedings, forcing investors to accept millions in losses, funds which they were legally entitled to. *

53. In a time when Americans are asked to sacrifice, I guess this does not apply to Michelle Obama, since she has 22 personal assistants, which does not include a markup artist and hair stylist, at the cost to the American taxpayer of $6,364,000 for 4 years. These assistants’ sole duties are to facilitate her social life. She must be a lot more incompetent than first thought, since as First Ladies Hillary Clinton only had 3 assistants, Jacqueline Kennedy had 1 assistant, and Laura Bush had 1 assistant.

54. On June 9, 2011, Obama signed Executive Order 13575 establishing the “White House Rural Council” which establishes unchecked federal control into rural America in education, food supply, land use, water use, recreation, property, energy, and the lives of 16% of the US population. No Congressional or local government oversight or input. *

55. Obama’s handler’s establishment of the “Super Committee” is the final nail in our republic’s coffin, and the establishment of a Marxist dictatorship. Congress has always had committees which meet and return to the main body with ideas and suggestions, which is then amended, debated, rewritten, and finally voted on. Not this Super Committee, their determinations are presented to the Congress who are not allowed to discuss debate, modify, rewrite. The Congress is limited to a straight up or down vote. Why is the Congress accepting this infringement on their constitutional duties? *

56. Obama forced British Petroleum to set up $20 billion slush fund supposedly to compensate Gulf coast residents and businesses, and sets up an Obama appointee to administer funds with no judicial or congressional oversight. *

57. Obama’s cabal cancelled 77 oil field development contracts already certified as proper by the Bush administration. This deliberate affront by Obama’s Interior Secretary prevents the extraction of 3 trillion gallons of oil in Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and North Dakota, which is more than enough to end our dependence on foreign oil. *

58. Obama signed the Russian-American START treaty which hampers US missile defense development and makes it difficult for us to modernize our rapidly aging nuclear weapons arsenal. It represents unilateral disarmament by the US in return for nothing more than Russian good will. What a joke.

59. Perhaps one of Obama’s most pathetic stunts was his chair of the UN Security Council, never done by a US sitting President. He was in the right place sitting as chair over an organization ruled by tyrants, and showing his true dual loyalties.

60. We need to look at Obama’s character, or in this case, his lack thereof. Obama is a total incognito with zero accomplishments. No experience, no education, no business sense or experience (only 8% of his entire administration has ever held a real job or run a business, other than being on the government dole), no military experience, a dangerous and treacherous narcissist, arrogant, incompetent, no class, serial liar, no humility, juvenile, no dignity, no genuine empathy, his personal narcissism and arrogance veiled by his hollow spoken empathy, quite ignorant, racist, Muslim, bereft of conscience, unable to determine between his fantasy and reality, incapable of genuine caring or concern, artificial, blames everyone else for his failure, and most of all Obama is a puppet, owned by his handlers, who maneuvered and manufactured his pathetic life.

61. Misuse of federal power and money in illegal international gun and drug running, the mis-distribution of taxpayer funds and manipulation of foreign governments, racketeering and smuggling, such as Project Gun Runner, resulting in the murder of U.S. agents.

NOTE: The items herein marked with an (*) at the end of the numbered statement, reflect a deliberate and malicious violation of the duties of the President as cited in Article II, Section 3. Of the United States Constitution, i.e. “…he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed…”.